J1IEX - Part - 2 is not allowing to process remaining line items

Dear Experts,
Material DOC NO xxxxxxxxx IS A SET OF 20 LINE ITEMS.
J1IEX(PART 2) ENTRY OF LINE ITEM NO 1 IS DONE WITH VENDOR EXCISE DOC. NO xxxxxx
REMAINING LINE ITEMS PART 2 ENTRY IS NOT ALLOWING TO POST AND SHOWING ERROR THAT THE MATERIAL DOCUMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN REFERRED FOR A DIFFERENT EXC. INV.
Please guide.
regards
Adi

Hi,
As people wrote above, you have to cancel the GR ,then J1iEX.
Make sure that in J1ID, you have maintained "Multiple GR,multiple Credit" in material & chapter ID combo.
Now if such case reappears in future, goto MIGO, in excise tab at item level, put all quanity in EI quanity & do the GR of actual received quantity.
Now when you will post it in J1IEX, system will pick only GR quantity.
For further GR of remaining quantity, at header in excise tab, select "Refer Excise Invoice" option & maintain same excise invoice number.
Try this. Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Piyush

Similar Messages

System should not allow to delete PO line Item after GR/IR

Hi,
I am working on a SAP Retail Implementation project.
Currently the system is allowing us to delete the PO line items after doing GR or IR against that PO line item. But the clients requirement is that the system should not allow to delete PO line item after doing GR/IR.
We are using Account Assignment Category-N, Item Category-S.
Please let me know if you have the solution for this requirement.
Thanks in advance
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh

Hi,
Standard SAP will not allowed the PO to be deleted once it was GR done. The controlled is on the attributes of message to set as "E"
Message no. 06115
But if invoiced takes place, the is the point that PO can be deleted.
You have to do have a Enhancement using MM06E005, insert you logic here to check PO history tables like EKBE, then check if invoice " Q" (BEWTP) exist, the PO cannot be deleted once the user delete the PO line and SAVE it. Ask you developer to help you on the following coding.
Use MM06E005 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
IF SY-TCODE = 'ME22N'.
IF sy-ucomm = 'MESAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'YES'..
LOOP AT TEKPO.
IF TEKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR1 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'E'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR2 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'Q'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
Regards,

Without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order

Our clients need is that without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order.
We are using CORK,cor6 and MB31 My need is to apply user exit in all cases.
I got input from sdn User exit:-PPCO0006 Function module Exit_SAPLCOZF_003
INCLUDE ZXCO1U06
I need to activate this only during confirmation.ie confirmation to be avoided if cost is not released.
Regards,
Pert

Hi,
You are right. For preventing confirmation in case std cost estimate release is not available you need to do enhancement. You can check for following exit along with exit which you mentioned in your post :
Enhancement CONFPI05
EXIT_SAPLCORF_405 - Process Ord. Conf.: Cust.-Specific Enhancements when Saving
INCLUDE ZXCOFU10
Check either of the enhancements which may fulfill your business requirement.
Regards,
Tejas

You are not allowed to have zero line only massages no. m8278

Hi all,
At the time of MIRO Reversal we are facing error massage.
You are not allowed to have zero line only massages no. m8278
Because of wrongly 0.00 amount posted in MIRO posting.
What we do please help me it is production system error.
Thanks & Regards,
Juhi
Edited by: juhis022 on Nov 8, 2011 1:43 PM

this is because for the document which you posting MRIS is not covered with invoicing plan settlement.
Please create a invoicing plan and settle through MRIS.

Event ID 10801 - Abstract class ID not allowed in a discovery data item.

Hi All,
I am getting very frequent event id 10801 on my RMSE -
Discovery data couldn't be inserted to the database. This could have happened because of one of the following reasons:
- Discovery data is stale. The discovery data is generated by an MP recently deleted.
- Database connectivity problems or database running out of space.
- Discovery data received is not valid.
The following details should help to further diagnose:
DiscoveryId: a8cc450e-fdfa-9ff0-e46f-0b8a3f58a57b
HealthServiceId: 4e1815a1-6704-e686-f490-15d7d46773d2
Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Common.DiscoveryDataAbstractClassIdNotAllowedException,Abstract class ID not allowed in a discovery data item.
Class ID: e2ea0f3e-a2ac-41d8-9ba2-7c0b524a121e
Rule ID: a8cc450e-fdfa-9ff0-e46f-0b8a3f58a57b
Instance:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><ClassInstance TypeId="{e2ea0f3e-a2ac-41d8-9ba2-7c0b524a121e}"><Settings><Setting><Name>5c324096-d928-76db-e9e7-e629dcc261b1</Name><Value>ABCD.domain.domain</Value></Setting><Setting><Name>af13c36e-9197-95f7-393c-84aa6638fec9</Name><Value>11</Value></Setting></Settings></ClassInstance>.
When I check the Discovery ID it gives me the below discovery.
PS C:\> [guid]$g = "a8cc450e-fdfa-9ff0-e46f-0b8a3f58a57b"
PS C:\> Get-SCOMDiscovery | where {$_.Id -eq $g}
HasNonCategoryOverride          : False
Enabled                         : onEssentialMonitoring
Target                          : ManagementPackElementUniqueIdentifier=3c998a33-cbc3-a258-b728-a67982377058
ConfirmDelivery                 : False
Remotable                       : True
Priority                        : Normal
Category                        : Discovery
DataSource                      : DiscoveryDataSource
DiscoveryClassCollection        : {}
DiscoveryRelationshipCollection : {ManagementPackElementUniqueIdentifier=08d64c2a-2ba5-cafa-54ad-bfe91e2a39b3}
XmlTag                          : Discovery
ManagementGroup                 : SCOMPRODUCTION
ManagementGroupId               : 1a77df0b-1a31-721c-be9d-aebe3f85db8c
Identifier                      : 1|Microsoft.Windows.HyperV.2012.Discovery/31bf3856ad364e35|1.0.0.0|Microsoft.Windows.
                                  HyperV.2012.VirtualNetworkContainsNetworkAdapterDiscovery||
Name                            : Microsoft.Windows.HyperV.2012.VirtualNetworkContainsNetworkAdapterDiscovery
Id                              : a8cc450e-fdfa-9ff0-e46f-0b8a3f58a57b
DisplayName                     : Hyper-V 2012 Virtual Network Relationship Discovery
Description                     : Discovers Microsoft Windows Hyper-V 2012 Virtual Network contains Network Adapter
                                  relationship
LanguageCode                    : ENU
Comment                         :
Status                          : Unchanged
LastModified                    : 12/11/2014 12:18:01 AM
TimeAdded                       : 12/11/2014 12:18:01 AM
InstanceName                    :
PS C:\>
I am getting this event for multiple agents now. I checked the discovery highlighted "Hyper-V 2012 Virtual Network Relationship Discovery" but did not get anything.
Can anybody help me in resolving this.
Thanks, S K Agrawal

Microsoft.Windows.HyperV.2012.VirtualNetworkContainsNetworkAdapterDiscoveryDataSourceModule Code (Code executed for your discovery Hyper-V 2012 Virtual Network Relationship Discovery)
Set oNIC = oDiscoveryData.CreateClassInstance("$MPElement[Name='WSLib!Microsoft.Windows.Server.NetworkAdapter']$")
      Call oNIC.AddProperty("$MPElement[Name='Windows!Microsoft.Windows.LogicalDevice']/DeviceID$", nicId)
      Call oNIC.AddProperty("$MPElement[Name='Windows!Microsoft.Windows.Computer']/PrincipalName$", ComputerIdentity)
This class (Microsoft.Windows.Server.NetworkAdapter) is defined as abstract class in “Microsoft.Windows.Server.Library.mp”
<ClassType ID="Microsoft.Windows.Server.NetworkAdapter"
Abstract="true" Accessibility="Public" Base="Windows!Microsoft.Windows.NetworkAdapter" Hosted="true" Singleton="false">
This was filed as a Bug with Microsoft.
Thanks, S K Agrawal

Profit Center is not getting captured in Vendor line item from MIRO.

Dear Friends,
Profit Center is not getting captured in Vendor Line Items from MIRO Transaction for some New Business Users, where as for Old Users profit center is getting generated at Vendor Line Item.
We have provided the same authorization of old Users to new business users. (i.e. New user is a copy of old user)
Please help us how we can the get Profit Center in all transactions will be processed by New Business users.
I think we need to maintain user based authorization to get the Profit center in vendor Line items processed from T.Code:MIRO in SAP.
Looking forward for your kind cooperation in this matter
Thanks & Regards,
Naveen Kumar.

Hello Naveen,
I am not very sure about your query, as you might be knowing that the Profit Center is only updated in New GL tables (FAGLFLEXA, FAGLFLEXT) and hence the Vendor relavant tables would not.
The profit center information in the split lines or the line of the 'General Ledger View' are only displayed within transaction FAGLL03 which read the 'new' table for the NewG/L.
About profit center wise reporting, when New GL is active Please review attached consulting SAP note:
- 826357 Profit Center Accounting and new general ledger in
I hope this helps. If not, please provide an example of your requirement.
Thanks and regards,
Suresh Jayanthi.

MIRO - Business Area not getting updated in Vendor Line item

Hello friends,
I am posting Vendor invoice in MIRO transaction.
After Posting if i see the financial document generated,
Business area has not got updated in Vendor Line item.
What could be the problem ?
Please help me out.
Hari Prasath

Hi Kale,
Make sure the field Business area is not supressed in tx. OB14. for the GL account in line item 001.
On the other hand, have a look to the note and kba below:
41294 - Business area in customer/vendor item
Kba 1727802 - Business area not getting populated in sales/ purchase tax

PO no not reflecting in GL/ Vendor line item display

Hi Guys,
Please let me know that why PO no (column is displaying but) data not reflecting in GL/ Vendor line item display using TCode FS10N? What may the possible reasons and how I can get the data flow in the column?

Hi Amit,
You are right and I've changed the layout. I've already said that the field displaying there but data is not flowing in the field. I mean to say that PO no is not reflecting in the specified field. However I am able to get the PO no. in Assignment field. What may be the reason and how I get the data (PO no.) in this field?

Provision that MRP is not be considered for specific line item of Sales Ord

Is their any provision that MRP is not be considered for specific line item of Sales Order in MRP run? (Ex: Planned order is also generated for free/ADC sample quantity entered in Sales order)

Dear
Go to Sales and distribution--> Sales --> Sales Documents -->Schedule Lines --> Assign schedule line categories.
Choose the item category (eg. TAN) which is coming in the sales order and enter CN - No. Mat. Planning in the the manual schedule line category (MSL Ca) for MRP type PD.
This will enable you to choose while creating sales order in the Tab procurement column SL Ca.
Choose CN - No mat.planning for the schedule items which you don;t want MRP.
Regards
Soundar

Condition type not getting populated at first line item of Sales order

Hi Experts,
We are creating Sales order through IDOC(Inbound function: IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS) for Document type ZXX then condition type is geeting populated at both line item, i have tried creating the Sales order through IDOC for document type ZYY the condition type is not getting populated in first line item, but for secod line item condition is getting populated.
we also checked pricing procedures related to this document types and we found these pricing types are mentioned in corresponding pricing procedures.
Let us know there are any other possible ways to find the same
please help.
Thanks!

Hi Rajani,
check the user exit in the FM..IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS
check if any filters kept for condition type field..
check the belwo user eixuts
ORDCHG I VEDB0001 Sales Ord. Change
ORDERS I VEDA0001 Sales Orders..
Regards,
Prabhudas

User defined Characterestics not being updated in actual line items

Gurus!
I am using Accounting Based COPA only.
I have defined a user based characteristic for which I am using user exit to derive.
However, this charaterstic is not getting updated in actual line items.
The derivation is working correctly at Sales order and Invoicing documents. (account assignment tab).
Where could I be going wrong??
Regards
Saurabh

Hi,
Please check the settlement rule of the sales order and check whether the relevant characteristics have been maintained in the settlement rule of PSG. If not, you may have to include the same.
Trust this helps much.
Cheers

The vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the

Hi All,
While executing t.code FBL3N,the vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the GL A/C4607000, some line items it is coming.
The GL A/c 4607000 is GR/IR clearing a/c.
Please let us know why this situation is happeing at the time of FBL3N.
Thanks
Ram

HI,
By activating the special fields you can the vendor number, but use the new reprot called "FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) ".
First go to SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)--> Master Data > G/L Accounts>Line Items --> Define Special Fields for Line Item Display
Click on New Entries -
Table - BSEG - Field - LIFNR
Save. Now execute the report - FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New)
Give the gl account number and execute.
After getting the line items list from menu select --Settings --> Special Fields --> Click on New Entries --> Enter Table BSEG, Field Name LIFNR.
After this come back and execute again. It will give you the vendor number.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.

You are not authorized to call up line item display (FB03)

Hi,
actually; I am facing a problem; one user is getting error message "You are not authorized to call up line item display" when he is trying to view the payment usage of document no in FB03 transaction code.
I have checked and found that user is already having display access for the company code which he is putting under company code field.
Also as per the SU53 screen shot; it is showing
Authorization check failed for S_CTS_ADMI
Field - CTS_ADMFCT
for - TABL
I have not run the trace yet..
Kindly advice on what could be the problem and solution for that...
Many thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Anuj

> Also as per the SU53 screen shot; it is showing
>
> Authorization check failed for S_CTS_ADMI
> Field - CTS_ADMFCT
> for - TABL
Total Questions: 8 (6 unresolved)
Good match!

MRP can be configured not to run for a line item

Hi Folks,
I have a question... Scenario is like this:
We are getting a Sales Order in SAP from a Portal which is exposed to external customers. The Sales Order has say 10 line items. Usually this will kick off MRP for each of these line items right away. Now we do not want MRP to kick off as we do not know as yet the line items in there are valid or not. There is another application which will confirm if the line item is valid or not. Once it confirms if the line item is valid the MRP will run for only those items which are valid and rest of the line items will be rejected.
Question how we can stop the MRP to not to run for the for the line item once the sales order is created. Creating a Delivery block is not going to help in stopping MRP run...
Looking for some out of the box solution without any customization.
Thanks and Regards
Roger

Hi,
Check your requirements class via transaction OVZG. Do they have automatic planning set? Is No MRP Set?
Regards

Invoice text(SGTXT) is not updating in payment proposal line items

Hi,
While doing payment proposal in F110, invoice text is not updating in payment proposal line items, which is available in ‘BSIK’ table.
Please find the attached screen shot. Please give me suggestions How to resolve this issue.

Hi,
The other line item accounts are revaluation accounts. So when there is no exchange rate, the amounts are zero.
Ezhil.

J1IEX - Part - 2 is not allowing to process remaining line items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for