Jagged Edges In Prints?

Hi all,
I seem to have a problem when printing via Lightroom 1.1
I'm using Windows Vista and an Epson R360.
On the some prints I seem to get a jagged edge effect on higher contrast joining areas,e.g. open blinds against a window. This aliasing(?) is not visible on the image and does not appear if I print directly from Vista or indeed any other applications I use. I am happy with the colour reproduction etc.
Have tried different print resolutions and leaving this unchecked - no difference. Any ideas anyone?
Thanks,
Darren

Yes, I believe so (its on the native). There are no issues any where else.
I've recalibrated the monitor a few times and have made the jaggedness less noticable but it still shows quite bad when using a large light soft brush on a dark background

Similar Messages

How do I get rid of jagged edges in Photoshop?

Can someone tell me how to get rid of jagged edges in Photoshop? I've tried using the refine tool and checking the anti-aliasing/smooth option, but neither appears to work. Here is the problem. I use Photoshop to create the images for heat transfers that I press on to T Shirts. In transparent mode, I cannot see the edges, nor can I see them once the transfer has been printed, but when I press the image on to a T-shirt the edges are extremely jagged. Also, when I add a solid blue background in Photoshop, I can see the edges. I am using the TW Cen MT Condensed Extra Bold font (140.13 pt).
Additional Questions:
Are there fonts that inherently behave this way when stretched?
Are there fonts that hold up more consistently when stretched?
Will rasterizing the image resolve this problem, or at least give me a higher quality image when stretched?
Is there a way of using inches instead of points for font size and if so, where do I change it?
Is there anyone out there who uses Photoshop to create text and images for T-Shirts? If you have the answer to any of my questions, please respond ASAP. It is extremely important that I be able to get consistent results clean, smooth images that transfer well onto fabric. I am attaching my text image on transparent background, as wells as a solid blue background. You may have to zoom in on the gold and black image to see the jagged edges on the fabric.

You have AA set to None in the Options bar is my guess. Use whatever option looks best, but never use None.

Can't get rid of jagged edges of aligned objects

I have the annoying problem of jagged edges on aligned objects in Illustrator. This image demonstrates it well: http://i.imgur.com/AIyK6vK.png
You can see the white background shining through where objects align to each other. I thought this was only a display thing which wouldn't show up on print or export, but I get the same aweful results when exporting to png, pasting as a smart object in PS etc. How do I fix this?
Thanks!

I've tried that aswell and it looks a bit better, but that isn't always (never?) a good solution.
Jacob, I've had no luck with the other thread, I was already using smart guides. This is a strange problem. I've not seen a lot about this anywhere else, don't you guys have this issue?
There is one better solution than a background layer. Select all objects and offset the path buy a very small number, maybe 0,01 mm but that is also more of a "hack" than a real solution..

Shapes get random jagged edges

Hello,
I am working on a freelance logo and the client kept mentioning that my sample PDF's seem to have "smudge" on part of it, I never saw it and then I asked them to actaully SEND me the file while I was not at my primary computer so I can look at it.
It is really wierd. It seem that when you zoom in and out the shape changes and gets these ramdom jagged edges. I don't see them on my computer or phone and my client only sees them on her desktops but it does also print out with these wierd edges as well. I converted all type to lines and did an export to PDF to show her samples. I have attached photo expamples. Please help! i have never had this before. The first image shows how it is supposed to look and how it did look when I first opened, the other 2 show what happens when it gets zoomed. And it changes too, it isn't the same jagged edges everytime.
Thanks!

In IIllustrator, you woudl normally chaneg your limit (AKA miter limit, flatness) to a lower number
Since this is happening in acrobat, you may be able to fix this with your preview settings. Problem with that is your clietn would also have to change their settings. The ones under rendering is what you want to change.
If thsi dont help. you want to look at where tehis is happening and if you have overlapping vector points, would be good to clena that up. You also could jsut use object >> path >> outline stroke, to get rid of stroke, so that acorabt is nto tryign to render them (whcih goes back to the beigginng of my post as I belive the pdf rendering of miter limits is at play here - no stroked paths, no miter limits).

Vector Circle Has Jagged Edges - Why?

I'm creating a button logo in Fireworks for print use and
wanted to use Vector shapes as I thought they didn't distort.
I'm working in CMYK at 300DPI.
So I start out with a white vector circle for the outer-ring
to the button using an Anti-Alias edge:
White
Button
Then I add the inner vector cirle, same deal as before:
Blue inner
circle
So far so good.
Now I add an outer bevel effect to the blue circle to give
the button effect and....
WOOOOOAAAAHHH!!!!
The blue circle's edges have gone jagged! What happened
there? I thought that Vector shapes retained their edges because
they weren't confined to tiny pixels. What's going on, why aren't
the edges retaining their smoothness once I've applied an effect to
the shape?

For now, if you recreate the effect with an inner bevel
instead you will
get rid of the jaggies. (softness = 7)
alex
thedrumdoctor wrote:
>
quote:
Originally posted by:
Newsgroup User
> thedrumdoctor wrote:
> > I tried the an export as a 24 Bit PNG and the edges
remaind jagged.
> >
> > I tried the same experiment in Photoshop with the
Vectors shapes there and
> the edges were perfect. Looks like Photoshop wins!
>
> Not sure what I am doing differently. I created a 300
dpi image in FW,
> drew the circle, filled it with blue and added a soft
bevel. No jagged
> edges. At 100% magnification things look fine on screen.
>
> Did similar in PS and got a very similar result,
although the bevel is a
> bit smoother.
>
> Are you referring to printed work, or screen work?
>
> Would really appreciate seeing the original png and
samples of the
> Photoshop vs Fireworks end results. If it's a
reproducible issue, it
> should be reported as a bug for future releases.
>
> --
> Jim Babbage - .:Community MX:. & .:Adobe Community
Expert:.
>
http://www.communityMX.com/
> CommunityMX - Free Resources:
>
http://www.communitymx.com/free.cfm
> ---
> .:Adobe Community Expert for Fireworks:.
> Adobe Community Expert
>
http://tinyurl.com/2a7dyp
> ---
> See my work on Flickr
>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim_babbage/
>
>
>
> Well, I've repeated the exercise with a new png file and
uploaded it here
>
http://www.nlauro.f9.co.uk/images/test.vector.circles.png
>
> As you can see, the edges are still jagged on the blue
circle. You can
> download this and see for yourself anyway.
>
> This was done in Fireworks MX so I'm not using the
latest release of Fireworks.
>
> The shape was eventually destined for print work by the
way. As much as I
> don't like the clumsy way PS forces you to create vector
shapes, it produced a
> near perfect smooth edge on the same experiment.
>

Jagged edges/pixilation

I'm trying to print a photo in iPhoto and it's coming out with jagged edges. When I print it as a 2x3 it looks ok, but when I print it as a 4x6 it blurs and pixelates.
When I printed it awhile back, even though the original is not as sharp as it could be, it printed ok, but now it's coming out with the images quite jagged.
I've tried varying the size of the image, but I'm not getting anywhere.
Thanks.

That image file is way to small to print anything larger than your 2 x 3 or smaller. Fairly decent prints can be made at 150 dpi which would limit that file to about 2.3 x 1.6.
That looks like the size of the thumbnails in iPhoto. Where did you get that image file? How did it get into iPhoto?

Jagged edges around inserted jpeg images

Hi There
I am using Adobe Acrobat Professional 8 in Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
When producing pdf's using Adobe Acrobat Pro 8 with the setting on high quality the images produced have very jagged edges (Jaggies) especially around logo's & imported images, not so much on text.
This has also been reflected in material that has come back from an external print job.
I had this problem on my olf pc & believe the fix for this was located somewhere in the advanced section of properties menu but i have not been able to find it.
Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Darren

It's best to try the smothing. In some cases with smothing on its too extreme and you go from Jaggies to Fuzzy looking Type. Sometimes so bad that its actually looks better with Jaggies, any thing below 8pt should not have font smoothing. In Acroabt it's all or nothing.

Shapes Created in AI CS6 Have Jagged Edges

Hi Everyone,
I have Illustrator CS6 and I've noticed something odd. Whenever I create shapes they have jagged edges. I've attached a screenshot so you can see this. I'm wondering if it's a setting or something that I don't have turned on (or off). Or perhaps it's something else. I've never noticed jagged edges in Illustrator before so I'm curious why it may be happening now.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

Doug,
As (the other) Doug said.
You may enjoy how the (slight) jaggedness becomes relatively smaller as you zoom in; that is an obvious way of determinning whether you have vector or raster artwork.
When you print, the visibility of jaggedness depends on the print method and resolution of spots/dots/lines/whatever, and when you present artwork on the web and similar, the jaggedness will depend on (the settings of) the monitors of the receivers/visitors.

Shape jagged edges issue?

I'm creating objects in illustrator (CMYK, 300dpi) for print purposes and the thing that bothers me is the jagged edges with a light pink color between the fill and stroke of the shape (see image) at any zoom level.
This shape, created in Illustrator, is being imported into a Photoshop collage at the same resolution on a dark grey background, where the jagged edges become even more striking.
Will this look as it should when it comes out of printing house? I know there's a difference between shape handling in Ai and Ps because of the different output media for each another...but still the screen appearance is disturbing.

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
I'm creating objects in illustrator (CMYK, 300dpi) for print purposes and the thing that bothers me is the jagged edges with a light pink color between the fill and stroke of the shape (see image) at any zoom level.
I'll assume your screenshot is from Illustrator, not from Photoshop after importing the AI elements. That is, I'll assume that both the red shape and the black shape are native to Illustrator, both are vector paths with ordinary fills applied (no raster-based effects), and you want to bring both of them into Photoshop. The undesirable "light pink" is what you're seeing in Illustrator.
First, understand that in Illustrator you are not creating pixels. You're creating paths. Paths are mathematically-defined curves. You apply fills, which are just another kind of command, not pixels. Now...as you work in Illustrator, Illustrator has to display what you are creating on your monitor as pixels, even though what it's creating are not pixels. In other words, it's "printing" the mathematical shapes to your monitor. Your monitor is acting as the "printer." The monitor has pixels, but your objects (the paths) don't.
By default, Illustrator "prints" to your monitor using an algorithm called anti-aliasing, which is just a routine that disguises the inhernent jaggedness of the large, crude monitor pixels in order to make the on-screen appearance smoother.
You can turn that anti-aliasing behavior off in Illustrator's preferences. Turn it off and you'll see the edge between the black and red objects become more jagged, but the pink goes away. The degree of jaggedness will stay the same regardless of zoom, because the jaggedness you're seeing is the physical jaggedness of the pixels of the output device (your monitor).
Well, the same principle applies to anti-aliasing. You say the undesirable light pink along the edges occurs "at any zoom". (Again, I'll assume you're doing the zooming in Illustrator, not Photoshop.) So if you have antialiasing turned on, and if you zoom in alot, you still see the unwanted pink edge. But now ask yourself: Does the pink edge actually grow larger as I zoom in? If it doesn't, it's not "real"; it's just the result of the anti-aliasing routine that Illustrator is using when it "prints" to your monitor.
Further, you already know that you have not created any pink objects, right? So the unwanted pink edge is just an anti-aliasing artifact when viewing the artwork in Illustrator on your monitor. That is, since you haven't created any pink objects, there won't be any pink objects when you save the Illustrator file.
Now...all the above applies while working in Illustrator. Read on...
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
This shape, created in Illustrator, is being imported into a Photoshop collage at the same resolution on a dark grey background, where the jagged edges become even more striking.
The artwork is "being imported" into Photoshop how? If you paste or import the vector artwork into Photoshop, it is going to be rasterized (converted to pixels). If you export the artwork from Illustrator to a raster image, it is going to be rasterized. Either way, somewhere along you are going to be presented an option to let you choose whether the imported or exported vector paths use anti-aliasing when that rasterization occurs. If you choose to apply anti-aliasing during the export or import, then yes those pink pixels are going to actually exist in the resulting raster image. However, the degree to which they are visible will depend on the size of the pixels relative to the scale at which they are printed.
So again, ask yourself the same question, but this time, in the context of Photoshop: When I zoom in alot (in Photoshop), does the unwanted pink edge grow larger? If it does, it's real pixels, and yes, it will print. But again, how visible it will be in print depends on printing scale.
Understand also: Such edges are not necessarily undesirable. In raster imaging, one often goes to great lengths to add such "edges" between adjacent pixels of different color. That's essentially what sharpening does. Sharpening actually alters the colors of adjacent differently-colored pixels so as to increase their difference. In the case of any color against black (since black can't get darker), this would result in an "edge" of pixels that are lighter than the non-black color.
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
Will this look as it should when it comes out of printing house?
That's where you have to define "as it should". When you rasterize the vector objects into another raster image in Photoshop, it all ultimately becomes one raster image. Zoom in and see if the pink pixels are actually there.
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
I know there's a difference between shape handling in Ai and Ps because of the different output media for each another
That doesn't make sense. If this is something that you know, you need to find a better way to state it.
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
...but still the screen appearance is disturbing.
On-screen appearance is always disturbing. Anti-aliasing is just one flavor of disturbance. Color accuracy is another. The fact is, a monitor is a very very different kind of output device from a printing press, and the two are never going to look the same. That's why the answer to whether it prints "as it should" lies in the printed results, and that's where you have to look for the answer. But if you send a raster image to a printer, if the unwanted pink pixels are actually there in the image file, then yes, they will print. You can determine whether they actually exist in the final raster image by examining it in Photoshop.
JET

Jagged edges on vector art and fonts on R1900 using AI CS5 in OSX

OS 10.6.4 (Mac Pro 2x2.4 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 12GB ram 1066 MHz DDR3)
Problem with the R1900 Printer and AI CS5
I have been using the same printer with CS4 without any trouble whatsoever for at least 5yrs. Beautiful quality prints without so much as itch and great color control...
In October I finally made the switch to CS5 and my printing capability goes to hell.
Quality printing straight from AI to a non-postcript inkjet printer such as the R1900 doesn't seem to be an option anymore...
I get jagged edges on vector art and fonts. I do graphic arts/logos/prints and this is a huge issue...!
Apparently I have to save my AI files as PDFs and print from there, but this poses extra steps, troubles in sizing, colors, page set up...
I mean nothing beats being able to print direct from AI... I cannot understand what the problem is all of a sudden.
At home I have a late '06 Mac Pro running CS4 and printing successfully to a C88 epson inkjet printer under OSX 10.5
What is the matter, please help, this is cramping my style and performance???
thank you
JF
New York

Ok this would not be a problem with 10.4.11 on a Power PV Mac but on an Intel Mac running 10.6.4 or running anything above 10.4.11 on any Mac you would need a postscript driver. Problem, there is no postscript driver for this model Printer this is actually a photo quality printer, that is what it does best.
So what to do the best one can do is to save the file as a pdf and print from Acrobat. There is no other way regardless of what one would like and expect.

Jagged edges using DVCPRO 50

yeesh.
We are capturing footage that was shot at 24 fps, 16:9 anamorphic standard def on an SDX900 camera using on DVCpro tapes, off of an AJSD93 deck over firewire. We capture with the DVCPRO50-NTSC codec, and have tried both 23.98 and 24.
and we are PLAGUED with these frames with horrible jagged edges. This appears to be an interlace/field dominance problem, but uh it was shot progressive. Any of you masters got any ideas?
below is the example frame
Using a quicksilver g4 finalcut 5.04
Thank you so much!
Dillon
g4 desktop Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Please pardon the intrusion…
Hi, Randy!
Congratulations on advancing to Level 4!
At the Water Cooler in the Level 4 Lounge, we are throwing virtual confetti in celebration of your attainment of Level 4-dom. Would you care to join us at the Water Cooler?
On the Discussions Home Page, down at the bottom, you will, hopefully, soon find the Lounge link available to you. It should show up for you within the next 24 hours if all goes as it should, but they have been "experiencing some technical difficulties" sometimes resulting in long and unforeseen delays. Have faith, keep looking for the link on the Discussions Home Page, and we'll keep the party going until you get there.
Hope to see you soon!

Images imported from QT exported image sequence have jagged edges

Hi
I've come across something strange which I'd like to resolve.
I export an image sequence from QuickTime.
I then import this into Aperture.
But the images imported into Aperture now have jagged edges where there has been any movement in the original footage.
The images originally exported from QuickTime look absolutely fine when viewed with preview, they have the expected blurring on moving objects, but no jaggedness.
Now, a bit more detail.
The footage I'm exporting from was shot by me and came from a Final Cut Pro edit.
The codec in the QT movie is Apple Intermediate Codec and this is interlaced.
The jagged edges on movement look to me like the problem of interlaced not being converted to progressive.
However the exported images from QuickTime don't display this when viewed in Preview, it is only when viewed in Aperture that the jagged edges become apparent.
I have tried exporting from QuickTime to jpg, png and psd, but the problem is identical no matter which format I use.
I really want to now use Aperture to improve these exported images, but with this jagged edge problem I can't.

Hi JNorris--
Sounds like you need to apply the deinterlace filter (Effects tab: video filters: video: deinterlace) to the stills your exporting.
See if that makes a difference to start.
T.

Saving Shapes to PNG Causes Jagged Edges

Hello,
I use a Mac and I have Illustrator CS6 and I've noticed something strange. I create shapes using the pentool. When I save the shape to a PNG with a transparent background, it looks smooth, however when I import and resize the shape it pixelates and it has jagged edges. I've attached a screenshot so you can see what I mean.
I'm wondering if it's a setting or something that I don't have turned on (or off). Or perhaps it's something else. I'm curious why this is happening. I’ve turned on the Anit-aliased Artwork and changed the ppi to 300…but to no avail.
Any help would be appreciated…but I’m new to Illustrator and have no idea, so please use detailed and basic instructions that a noob can understand.
Thanks in advance.

peta2005 wrote:
however when I import and resize the shape it pixelates and it has jagged edges.
You answered your own question. A png is a raster image therefore resizing the image will pixelate it.

Jagged Edges after rotating a stroked image

I've have this problem a lot but I guess I'm just now getting around to ask about it.
When I have a photo in cs2-cs3-cs4 etc and I rotate it at an angle I get fine jagged edges all along the sides. It's becomes very pronounced in a stroked image even when I I stroke the image after rotation. The problem is more obvious when the image is not at angles like 45 or 90 degrees but more visible at in between angles.
Any suggestions?

ryanroy.roy wrote:
I've have this problem a lot but I guess I'm just now getting around to ask about it.
When I have a photo in cs2-cs3-cs4 etc and I rotate it at an angle I get fine jagged edges all along the sides. It's becomes very pronounced in a stroked image even when I I stroke the image after rotation. The problem is more obvious when the image is not at angles like 45 or 90 degrees but more visible at in between angles.
Any suggestions?
What you are seeing is alaising, and it is inherent in raster graphics when the line to be shown is not parallel to the columns or rows of the image.It can be mitigated to some extent by antialaising, which softens the edges of the diagonal lines. When you select all of an image and stroke for a border, antialaising is used. With the polygonal lasso tool, you can turn antialaising on or off. Alaising is less apparent with very high resolution, but it can't be elilminated.
Here are triangular selections with antialaising turned on and off:

Jagged Edges on Images in Dreamweaver CS3

When placing an image with a transparent background in Dreamweaver CS3, I keep encountering ugly jagged
edges, whether I save the image as a .png or a .gif. I've tried everything I can think of to eliminate this problem,
and still the same results.
The only thing that has worked to eliminate the jagged white edge has been to place a background layer behind the image,
but that poses yet another problem because the hex colors in Photoshop and Dreamweaver will not match either.
Frazzled!! Somebody please help!

That's not a problem with DW. The jagged edge you see on your phone image is a jagged edge on your phone image!
I got a bit of a better result after about 5 minutes fumbling with the eraser in Photoshop:
http://www.martcol.co.uk/test/phone.html
It shouldn't take too much to get your original good enough to lose that jagged edge.
Martin

Jagged Edges In Prints?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for