Java Applet  Smaller than actual Size

Hi:
I have a very strange problem with commercial java applications and IE 6.X Web Browser. I'll appreciate if some one can help me. Following is description of the problem:
1. If I run a commercial java application, which certainly uses jre and I have no access to the code, some applets are smaller than their actual size and I cannot resize them, 'cause resize is disabled in the code. This causes a problem, 'cause I can't see the full applet.
2. The pop up IE 6.X browser windows has the same problem.
3. I noticed this after installing the latest version of jre 1.4.1, and then I uninstalled it, tried another version, but can't solve the problem.
I'll appreciate if some body can help me solve this problem.
Thanks
Nadeem Ahmed

Hi,
some applets are smaller than their actual size and I
cannot resize them, 'cause resize is disabled in the
code.I don't understand : an applet is running in an HTML page and cannot be resized. The size of the applet is specified in the HTML "applet" tag. The only case in which the applet can be resized is if the size of applet is in % of page width (i.e. "width=100%")
Xavier

Similar Messages

  • Iphoto exports photos smaller than actual size

    this problem just recently started, and i haven't changed anything (settings, os, way i import photos, etc...). basically when i upload photos on line, or open them up in another program by opening them through this process:
    file - open - photos - iphoto library - data - *folder name* - *image title*
    the photos all come out to be about 3x2 inches or so. most of them should be around 6x4 or so... i would just like to find a way to upload/open a file from iphoto, without having to take the photo out of iphoto, save it at a different file name into a different location, and having to open it up from that location. it adds too much work and uses up too much hard disk space, because i upload a lot of photos online.
    anyone know?

    The problem is that you're not exporting at all; you're grabbing the file from the iPhoto library. Since you're going into the Data folder, you're getting the thumbnail that iPhoto creates to make viewing your library efficient.
    The correct way to do this is to choose the photos you want from within the iPhoto application (not the library folder in Finder). Select File > Export > File Export, where you can create a folder on your desktop for the exported copies. In the export dialog you will also have the option to rename the copies or resize them for better performance in email or websites. When you have used the exports you can delete them; iPhoto keeps your original files safe inside the library.
    Okay, I know you said you want to leave them in the library. But you can save disc space by deleting your exports after you've finished uploading them.
    The reason I'm reluctant to tell you how to do it your way is that one of the most common causes of iPhoto damage is when people mess around inside the iPhoto library folder in Finder. Any changes made while you're in there will break the link between your file and the iPhoto database. At worst, you can corrupt your whole database and have to start over with a fresh library.
    That being said, you should know that the full-sized photos are contained in either the Originals folder (unedited photos here) or the Modified folder (edited and rotated photos here). The advantage to exporting is that iPhoto knows which one to copy; to find it yourself you have to go looking around a bit.
    And, just to be safe, you can use Finder to make a duplicate of the file Library6.iPhoto, located just inside the iPhoto Library folder. (It's a relatively small file.) Keeping a current copy of this file will allow you to easily restore your library in the event of database corruption. I make a new duplicate every time I close iPhoto and keep the 2 most recent copies as back-up.

  • Causes of ORA-01200: actual file size of x is smaller than correct size n ?

    Hello everyone
    We are running Oracle 11.2.0.3 64-bit E/E on Oracle Linux 6.2 with UEK R2 on X64.
    Using Grid and ASM 11.2.0.3 and OMF names.
    The database files are alll on SAN, the SAN vendor name not disclosed here to protect the innocent/guilty 8^)
    I have a Test database MYDB (in NOARCHIVELOG mode) and after a normal server reboot, not a crash, the following error occured on Oracle database startup.
    srvctl start database -d MYDB
    PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.mydb.db
    CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.mydb.db start" encountered the following error:
    ORA-01122: database file 1 failed verification check
    ORA-01110: data file 1: '+ASMDATA/mydb/datafile/system.256.787848913' <<<<<<<<<<---------------------------------------------------- Corrupt file on ASM disk, system tablespace this time
    ORA-01200: actual file size of 94720 is smaller than correct size of 98560 blocks <<<<<<<<<<---------------------------------------------------- ERROR message
    The ASM disks are all up and disk groups are mounted OK. The ASM protection level is EXTERNAL.
    My understanding that the only proper recovery from the above error is to use RMAN Restore Database/File/Tablespace.etc (and then RMAN Recover, when in ArchiveLog mode).
    I do have RMAN disk backups, so I don't need to "patch" the database to recover.
    This is not my question at this point in time.
    My Question is this : what are the most likely causes of such error?
    Oracle Database bug? OS bug? Disk driver error? Server hardware failure (bus, memory, etc)? Or a SAN bug?
    I expect that Oracle 11g R2 will always come up with the database "clean" if the server reboots or if server crashes (i.e. due to complete power failure) provided the actual storage is not physically damaged.
    Our SAN vendor (no names!) says they are of the opinion that it's most likely Oracle database or Oracle Linux 6.x/UEK software bug, or probably Oracle ASM 11.2 bug.
    We have opened a support call with Oracle.....
    My personal experience dealing with similar database errors on more recent releases of Oracle (9i R2, 10g R2, 11g R2) and also MS-SQL 2005 and 2008 R2 suggests this kind of a problem is most likely related to errors/bugs in storage/drivers/firmware/BIOS and SAN and not likely to be a 'database' or O/S bug.
    Perhaps you, good people on this forum, can share their experiences, as unbiased as you can?
    Many thanks

    Ive seen Ora-1200 twice I think over the years, both times there was disk problems which led to write issues which caused file problems, youve reported no such issues on your side though so if thats actually true, Im thinking bug.

  • ORA-01200: actual file size of 437759 is smaller than correct size of 43776

    Hi,
    I am getting the following unexpected errors while going to create CONTROL files after successful completion of offline/online oracle backup RESTORE (of PRD system) on Quality system. We are following Database specific system copy method to do the same.
    All the required pre & post restore activities for the same were carried out. Even the same RESTORE activities are performed with different different online/offline backups of PRD system to do such system copy. But, the thing is stuck at control file creation step with the following same error which is seen again & again after every DB restore operation.....
    SQL> @/oracle/AEQ/saptrace/usertrace/CONTROL.SQL
    ORACLE instance started.
    Total System Global Area 4714397696 bytes
    Fixed Size                  2050336 bytes
    Variable Size            2365589216 bytes
    Database Buffers         2332033024 bytes
    Redo Buffers               14725120 bytes
    CREATE CONTROLFILE REUSE SET DATABASE "AEQ" RESETLOGS  ARCHIVELOG
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01503: CREATE CONTROLFILE failed
    ORA-01200: actual file size of 437759 is smaller than correct size of 437760 blocks
    ORA-01110: data file 4: '/oracle/AEQ/sapdata1/sr3_1/sr3.data1'
    At OS level the file size of sr3.data1 is found 3586129920 bytes (= 437760 * 8192 bytes).
    host1:oraaeq 20> cd /oracle/AEQ/sapdata1/sr3_1
    host1:oraaeq 21> ll
    total 7004176
    -rw-r--r--   1 oraaeq     dba        3586129920 May 11 02:26 sr3.data1
    The above mentioned error is coming for all 294 data files. The reported file size difference is only of 1 Block in all data files. The DB block size is 8192 bytes.
    Environment: (for SAP QUALITY & PRD systems)
    OS: HP_UX ia64 B.11.23
    SAP System : SAP ECC 6.0
    Database: Oracle 10.2.0.2.0
    Your help for this reported issue will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Bhavik G. Shroff

    Hi,
    Thanks for your response.
    We already have tried the same whatever you have mentioned as suggestions in ur last post .
    We already tried to extend all 294 data-files as mentioned in that oracle forum link.
    Its not the recommended way to play with data-files in such a way  as it can lead to other unnecessary errors.
    We have seen the following errors after successful creation of control file by manually extending all those 294 files (it was around 10hrs job).
    Specify log: {<RET>=suggested | filename | AUTO | CANCEL}
    auto
    ORA-00332: archived log is too small - may be incompletely archived
    ORA-00334: archived log: '/oracle/AEQ/oraarch/AEQarch1_268984_629943661.dbf'
    have you tried also restoring init<SID>.ora file from PRD to new system.
    I think its not having relationship with control file generation. Both systems are having same init files with respective SIDs.
    Did you find any other points in your further investigation ?
    I am thinking to perform Fresh SAP System Installation with same SID (AEQ) and then will try to do Database Restore again with last offline backup of AEQ system.
    Regards,
    Bhavik G. Shroff

  • Image size of iPhone 5S is smaller than screen size

    When I click any picture with my iPhone 5s, the image size is always 20-30% smaller than screen size. Its like a picture clicked from iPhone 4, is this an issue or is it designed in that way?? Coz Images clicked in potrait mode are always cropped 20-30% and I am not liking it..

    If auto adjust to fit with the Default Full Zoom extension isn't working then the pages may be using absolute values for elements and in such a case you would have to zoom the pages manually.
    Can you post a link to a few pages where it isn't working properly?

  • Error Code - client cache is smaller than the size of the requested content

    Even though we have increased the size of the ccmcache via Control Panel > Configuration Manager, we still get the Error Code 0x87D01202 (-2016407038) "the content
    download cannot be performed because the total size of the client cache is smaller than the size of the requested content"  The CCMEXEC Service and computer have both been restarted, after increasing the ccmcache size.  Which local log
    file under C:\Windows\CCM\Logs should we check for more information ?
    Thanks

    so when you re deploying the client go into your settings and set the variable below:
    smscachesize=10240
    note:
    SMSCACHESIZE
    Specifies the size of the client cache folder in megabyte (MB) or as a percentage when used with the PERCENTDISKSPACE or PERCENTFREEDISKSPACE property. If this property is not set, the folder defaults to a maximum size of 5120 MB. The lowest value that you
    can specify is 1 MB.
    Note
    If a new package that must be downloaded would cause the folder to exceed the maximum size, and if the folder cannot be purged to make sufficient space available, the package download fails, and the program or application will not run.
    This setting is ignored when you upgrade an existing client and when the client downloads software updates.
    Example: CCMSetup.exe SMSCACHESIZE=100
    Note
    If you reinstall a client, you cannot use the SMSCACHESIZE or SMSCACHEFLAGS installation properties to set the cache size to be smaller than it was previously. If you try to do this, your value is ignored and the cache size is automatically set to the last
    size it was previously.
    For example, if you install the client with the default cache size of 5120 MB, and then reinstall the client with a cache size of 100 MB, the cache folder size on the reinstalled client is set to 5120 MB.
    Twitter: @dguilloryjr LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dannyjr Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/#!/dguilloryjr

  • Why does my artwork print slightly larger than actual size? - MacOS 10.9.2

    I have an issue which I have no answer.  Every time I print an artwork for product mockup, say a 3x5 card, it prints slightly larger than a 3x5 card.  I have to manually scale my artwork down to 98.5 in the print dialog to get as close as possible to the actual size.  Its not related to a specific printer.  I have an HP printer and a Canon printer and the issue exists exactly the same between the two.  I'm running Illustrator 17.1 on an iMac running MacOS 10.9.2.  Can you please help make this easier for me?
    Wayne Carey
    Marketing Graphics Designer
    Strike King Lure Company

    Wayne,
    Are you using PostScript printer drivers (or at least PostScript emulation)? Non PostScript drivers may behave a bit like gremlins.
    What happens if you Save As or Print to PDF and then print from that using the actual size/no adaptation to paper size?

  • Pixel iteration when footage smaller than sequence size?

    Hi everyone,
    I am having a problem with my plugins when the footage is smaller than the sequence.
    For some reason Premiere (and only Premiere, AE is fine in this regard) iterates pixels not from the clip origin (let's say 200,100), but from sequence origin (0,0). Since it only iterates the amount of pixels that is proper clip size (correct), it results in part of the layer being totally cut off (in this example 200 pixels from the right, and 100 pixels from below).
    For what it's worth, if the clip has proper aspect ratio, and scale to sequence size is clicked, or if the bigger clip is scaled down, the effect is applied properly.
    I have tried using various offsets, but I could not get it to work. Obviously I'm missing something. I am using AE SDK.
    Thanks for any help.
    Bart

    OK, I got this mostly figured out with one exception. The following code:
    ciP.crop_topF  = params[CROP_TOP]->u.fs_d.value * in_data->height / 100 + in_data->pre_effect_source_origin_y  * ciP.downsample_y.den / ciP.downsample_y.num
    works fine for every downsampling ratio except for the full resolution, when the value is moved by fixed amount, independent of source origin, crop position, etc. Curiously, similar formula for x works fine, although it is later scaled by pixel ratio.
    What values of are used for full resolution? What might be the reason for such behavior?

  • Apple TV screen is smaller than TV size

    Hello. We just installed a sound bar on our TV and now the HDMI cable for the Apple TV is plugged directly into the receiver, vs the TV. Now the Apple TV screen is a smaller box centered in the middle of the TV, about half the size as the actual TV. Any idea how to fix this?

    Check your TV settings.

  • I'm trying to get the image to print correct size.  i've tried center image, fit to media image,  and they all come out the same size...smaller than the size in "image size".  is this an Epson problem or Photoshop problem.  Thanks!

    I just got a new printer...Epson R3000...but have had this problem before.  It's probably a simple fix, but I can't figure it out.  I'm asking for printing on 8.5 x 11 and the image comes out 6.5 x 9.5 every time.  Help please!  And thanks!

    The Epson site stated that the R3000 printer can print borderless however the quality will suffer in the expanded print area. Borderless is not supported on some heavy paper.  To me the means your better off limiting you images size to the standard print area. There will be magins about 1/8" on the four  sides so the print area on 8.5"x11" paper is 8.26" x 10.76"....
    Take note of the print size set by the epson driver it may change depending on the paper type set. Note my first epson 4800 setup where I set 8.5" x 11" sheet paper from tray into the printer setting the driver set a smaller size for the paper which was reflected into the Photoshop Print preview. It shows paper is 8.499" x 10.999 with a small unprintable area across the top....
    Paper
    Use paper under normal conditions:
    Temperature: 59 to 77 °F (15 to 25 °C)
    Humidity: 40 to 60% RH
    Note:
    Since the quality of any particular brand or type of paper may be changed by the manufacturer at any time, Epson cannot guarantee the quality of any non-Epson brand or type of paper. Always test a sample of paper stock before purchasing large quantities or printing large jobs.
    Single-sheets
    Size
    A4 (8.3 × 11.7 inches)
    A6 (4.1 × 5.8 inches)
    Letter (8.5 × 11 inches)
    Legal (8.5 × 14 inches)
    4 × 6 inches
    5 × 7 inches
    8 × 10 inches
    11 × 14 inches
    12 × 12 inches
    Half Letter (5.5 × 8.5 inches)
    B (11 × 17 inches)
    A3 (11.7 × 16.5 inches)
    Super B (13 × 19 inches)
    Paper types
    Plain paper
    Special papers distributed by Epson
    Thickness
    0.003 to 0.004 inch (0.08 to 0.11 mm) in the sheet feeder
    0.012 to 0.051 inch (0.3 to 1.3 mm) in the manual feed tray
    Weight
    17 lb (64 g/m2) to 24 lb (90 g/m2)
    Printable Area
    Note:
    When printing borderless, quality may decline in the expanded printable area. Borderless printing is not supported with poster board.
    Sheets
    Top: 0.12 inch (3 mm) minimum
    Left: 0.12 inch (3 mm) minimum
    Right: 0.12 inch (3 mm) minimum
    Bottom: 0.12 inch (3 mm) minimum
    Roll Paper
    Standard margins
    Borderless printing margins
    CD/DVDs
    Caution:
    Avoid printing in the clear plastic areas of your discs to prevent staining the disc with ink.

  • Image button imports much larger than actual size

    I have a lot of custom image buttons in my Captivate project. I am now trying to scale them down in size, to reduce overall file size of my project. Some of my custom png images show up as 100 px in Photoshop, then when I import them into Captivate, they stay the same. However others, that show as 100px in photoshop, are importing in at 400px! Any ideas why this would happen. The original set was 400px. But I have overwritten the files with smaller ones in the gallery and re-inserted them - but still no luck.  Thanks.

    Hi
    i am posting this again due to lack of response. Its urgent. so i will really be thankful to anyone who can help.
    My application prints out cd labels. As i checked the width of a cd label is 12.5 cm which is 472 pixels. Now when i set component size to 472 pixel and print just that component, the out put seems to be much larger. like it covers almost 90% width of a A4 page. My code is like this:
    I want to print LabelContainer
    private function print():void
         printjob = null;
         printjob = new FlexPrintJob();
         LabelContainer.printDataGrid.selectedIndex = -1;
         try{
              if(printjob.start()){
                   datamodel.showTitles = false;
                   printjob.addObject(LabelContainer,FlexPrintJobScaleType.NONE);
                   printjob.send();
                   datamodel.showTitles = true;
         }catch(e:Error){
              Alert.show(e.message);
    can some one please help me. I really dont understand this.

  • Printing-Why is printed pic cropped smaller than actual pic?

    Regardless of paper size/print size selected, every pic I select to print seems to zoom in and cut off the edge when printing. Looks like I zoomed in for the print but I did not. Any help on how to get the print to match what I see on the screen? Thanks.

    Sorry if I'm not getting this. My pictures are downloaded from the camera into iPhoto. In iPhoto, I see the entire picture, I then select a photo, print to a 4x6 borderless, and the printed picture has now cut off edges compared to how the picture looks in iPhoto.
    One More Time
    Try selecting the photo and clicking print, select the printer, paper size and print size and click customize and right click on the preview and select fit to frame - now you should see all of the photo in the preview and the print should have everything
    Alternatively you can crop the photo to the print size and print
    Obviously if the photos and the print size are different something has to give -
    LN

  • Photoshop images for chroma key background smaller than frame size??

    Hi Guys can anyone help.
    New to Final Cut Express. Putting together a project with Chroma Key and creating backgrounds in Photoshop. Creating PAL D1/DV 768x576 images. importing into final cut and image will not fit frame. I'm obviously doing something wrong. Any suggestions please? Thanks

    Those numbers are for square pixel image sizes not for D1 pixels. Use those numbers for a flat image or one without transparency using square pixels.

  • HT2506 Viewing images in Preview at actual size

    Why does Preview open an image and display it in a size much smaller than the actual size?
    The default is marked as "Actual Size" in the View menu, but it's much smaller than actual size. Nothing in Preferences changes this.
    (I've never had a problem with this on my older Macs.)
    Thank you!

    Thanks, but that's not it I'm afraid. Here's what I mean. The image on the right is the actual size, as opened up in a web page. The image on the left is how Preview displays it when the file is opened. And hitting ⌘-0 doesn't change the size, only zooming does.

  • Map.app image size is almost never correct. Always small, except when 'actual size'!

    I insert images into Apple Mail and they look fine (Image Size set to "Actual Size".)
    But sometimes I want then slightly smaller without editing, saving and re-loading.
    So I use the very handy Image Size feature in Mail.app.
    Sadly, whether the image is set to Small, Medium or Large, the image is ALWAYS resized to Small.
    On rare occasions I see a difference for Large, but then medium and small are always the same. 
    Even the byte counts for the message are the same across all image sizes.
    It seems the only REAL options are 'Small' and 'Actual Size'.
    I have had this issue with all versions of Mac OS X that included this feature up to and including Mavericks.
    Has anyone figured out the messed up magic that makes this feature work correctly, or in sty least a sane or consistent manner?

    Thanks for the reply Jon, but unfortunately I ended up with the same result as MTSTUNER said (using the Crop Tool).
    MTSTUNER, that definitely helped. The problem must have been in pasting, which as you said brings a "non-smart" image over. I was even able to resize a bit on the new document without losing any clarity whatsoever. Very helpful - THANK YOU!

Maybe you are looking for