Java Enterprise Edition Installation Issues

Hello
I am trying to install version 8 of the Java Enterprise Edition software but I am experiencing 2 errors. Sometimes I get a message that it cannot find the jre and now the jvm. I have JRE_HOME and JAVA_HOME defined. When this happens after the path page is done, I get a dialog error message with just an x in it. The other error happened once after defining the variables with an out of memory error. I have 2 gigabytes of memory,
I need some help.

Enterprise Edition -- that's the one you pay a lot of
$$ for, right? I would think those $$ entitle you to
telephone support, or am I wrong?They have an enterprise trial that allows you a free 30 days (full functionality).
I personally have not had any problems with it. (WinXP, RedHat 9.0)
Smooth like butter.

Similar Messages

Now Live: New Java Enterprise Edition 6 Certification Exams

The new Java Enterprise Edition 6 (EE6) exams are being released into production, effective today (February 21, 2011). READ MORE for details… http://bit.ly/ORC-0520

Yes, no matter whether I choose Native Packages or Zip, I get the same file to download. These are the options I am selecting for each:
1) Directory Server Enterprise Edition 6.x
2) 6.0
3) Compressed Archive (ZIP)
4) Solaris 10 SPARC
OR
1) Directory Server Enterprise Edition 6.x
2) 6.0
3) Native Package (PKG)
4) Solaris 10 SPARC
As I mentioned, doesn't matter which one of the above two selections I make, I always get the same java_es-5-identsuite-ga-solaris-sparc.zip file.
Is anyone else seeing the same behavior in the downloads?

SAP NW Java Slim Edition Installation Error

HI All,
While i'm installing SAP NW Java Slim Edition
I'm getting below error(ERR-24936,ERR_DBNORUN: Database instance is not running).
Could someone help me to fix this issue.
Thanks,
Chandra,
ERROR 2006-08-19 00:06:53
CJS-00030 Assertion failed: in function sapdb_check_schema(dbhost, dbname, db_sch)
{    var r_v = false;    var sdbInst = new sdbInstance();    sdbInst.dbName = dbname;
sdbInst.dbHost = dbhost;    var sql_statement = "SELECT USERNAME FROM DOMAIN.USERS";
var r_arr = sdb_sql_query(sql_statement, sdbInst);    ASSERT(arguments.callee,
r_arr != undefined, "ERROR EXECUTING DBMCLI COMMAND!");    if (r_arr[0] == "false")
{        var err_msg = "ERROR EXECUTING SQL QUERY: ";
for (var i_cnt = 1; i_cnt < r_arr.length; i_cnt++) {            err_msg = err_msg + r_arr[i_cnt];        }
      ASSERT(arguments.callee, false, err_msg);    } else {
var cmp_s = new RegExp("'" + db_sch.toUpperCase() + "'");
for (var i_cnt = 0; i_cnt < r_arr.length; i_cnt++)
{            if (cmp_s.test(r_arr[i_cnt])) {                r_v = true;            }        }    }    return r_v;}
ERROR EXECUTING SQL QUERY: Error! Connection failed to node Chandu for database
J2E: ERR_USRFAIL: user authorization failed
ERROR 2006-08-19 00:24:55
CJS-00030 Assertion failed: in function sapdb_check_schema(dbhost, dbname, db_sch)
{    var r_v = false;    var sdbInst = new sdbInstance();    sdbInst.dbName = dbname;
sdbInst.dbHost = dbhost;    var sql_statement = "SELECT USERNAME FROM DOMAIN.USERS";
var r_arr = sdb_sql_query(sql_statement, sdbInst);
ASSERT(arguments.callee, r_arr != undefined, "ERROR EXECUTING DBMCLI COMMAND!");
if (r_arr[0] == "false") {        var err_msg = "ERROR EXECUTING SQL QUERY: ";
   for (var i_cnt = 1; i_cnt < r_arr.length; i_cnt++) {            err_msg = err_msg + r_arr[i_cnt];        }
       ASSERT(arguments.callee, false, err_msg);    } else
{        var cmp_s = new RegExp("'" + db_sch.toUpperCase() + "'");
for (var i_cnt = 0; i_cnt < r_arr.length; i_cnt++) {            if (cmp_s.test(r_arr[i_cnt]))
{                r_v = true;            }        }    }    return r_v;}
ERROR EXECUTING SQL QUERY:
ERR-24936,ERR_DBNORUN: Database instance is not running

Hi Chandra,
Did you install SAPDB?. Seems like the DB is not installed or is offline, <b>ERROR EXECUTING DBMCLI COMMAND</b> seems like DBMCLI commands are not been recognized.. Did you when through all th pre-installation checks?
Regards
Juan
Please reward with points if helpful

Oracle 8i Enterprise Edition installation

As an OTN member. I had asked for free JDeveloper CD. Oracle corporation has
sent me JDeveloper and Oracle 8i Enterprise Edition release 2 version 8.1.6
for Windows NT/2000.
I am a programmer. I want to use oracle 8i to learn oracle RDBMS.
When I try to install Oracle 8i it says installing oracle client. It gives me
options of administrator, programmer, user and custom. It installs oracle
client successfully. But oracle server is missing. So I can not connect to
server and do any database function. Please help me on this.
Let me know if on a standalone PC with Windows 98 installing Oracle 8i client
is enough. If not How do I get another software. If I am making any mistake please let me know.
I think I should have either Oracle personal edition or Oracle server edition
null

Hi Aditya
Thank you for your time.
CD # is C13341-02
If I install Windows 2000 on my PC would this CD install database.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Adithya, Oracle Support Analyst:
Hi,
You cannot install oralce 8i Enterprise edition on windows 98.
You should be able to install it on windows
NT workstation.
If you are unable to install oracle 8i database, please let me know the CD part number.
regards,
Adithya
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

BI enterprise edition installation;all on just one server

Hi everybody,
I am going to install Oracle business intelligence 11 on linux x86-64 platform.As it needs a database to be installed I have to install Oracle 11gR2 on the same server.
I was reading Oracle BI documentation that I came across this sentence:
The database must be up and running, and does not have to be on the same computer where you are installing the components
I know base on distribution it is better to separate BI repository(Oracle database) and its application.
What if I want to use same server for both?Any special error or prevention by Installer?
All the best,

Hi Arash,
The recommendation to have different hosts for each component of your BI environment is mostly to optimize performance in production systems, for development and demo environments you can have the whole stack installed in a single system.
RCU is a separate download, you can find it at the bottom of this page:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-enterprise-edition/downloads/bus-intelligence-11g-165436.html

SQL Server Enterprise Edition installation and V3

Hi Team,
Our trial evaluation version of the SQL Server has expired. We already have a SQL Server Enterprise edition DVD which was shipped along with the SAP ECC 6.0 (2004S) software (which we purchased from SAP).
1. Can we install this DVD on the Discovery system?
2. If yes, what are the steps please?
3. If no then, what are the steps to install the demo license again?
4. What do we have to do to upgrade to Version 3 of Discovery system? Is there any cost involved?
Please respond. Your help and guidance would be of tremendous value to us. Points would be awarded for helpful answers.
Thanks much for your time.

Hi Suresh,
Microsoft SQL server is an evaluation version for 180 days.
you need to have a regular database license ready after that timeframe.
That licence you get from microsoft.
Try these steps for reinstalling DB server.
Detach the databases,
Uninstall the SQL eval version,
Reinstall a fully licensed Enterprise addition of SQL and then
Re-attach the db's (using the script attach_dbs.bat, step 5,in
the Quick Guide).
This should be all that is needed.
Please make sure you back-up the system before going through all
the steps.
You are free to upgrade your v2.0 system by downloading patches
and service packs from SAP's Service MarketPlace and applying
them to the system. As the DS is an appliance - bundled hardware
and software , there is no automatic upgrade from v2.0 to v3.0.But
we cant assure you about the compatiability of new scenarios
developed for V3.0 for this upgrade version of V2.0.
I suggest you easiest way of using a full configured V3 is
buying new Hardware.Then you will have new scenarios.
yes, you are right DS V3.0 is packed with MAX DB5.5.
Hope this information will help you,
Best Regards,
Sanam

Windows 10 Enterprise Edition: Installation and Development Environment Essentials: Thoughts & Assistance Req:

Hello,
I am in the architecture planning stage of my project and seeking personal and general good advice from Mircosoft engineers. I am laying the foundation stones of a new development product using at least three more new technologies that are
as new as Windows 10. Their are also around four or five technology partners with the latest version of their software that I wish to take onboard. Due to the sensitive nature of the project it is not wise for me to state each piece of technology used,
so I will be as accurate as possible using the limited means I have.
I wish to make a "closed" development environment, with the latest build (currently 9860), install the new software. Some of which installs fine, some of which is not compatabile with Windows 10. Regarding the latter I am in discussions with the
technology providers to make a work-around and hammer and chisel through every issue. Very soon I hope to have a fully stable working development environment which paves the road to a first prototype. So i need to make a decision soon to "lock
down" everything. I will miss Windows 10 updates but the advantage is when the project vertical slice is complete, the feedback and benefit will be larger for Windows 10 final product.
This is probably my fifth or sixth early evaluation of the Windows platform and I am aware of the highs and lows of working with various versions using new builds, from the stability of win98 (becoming 2000 - minus millennium 1999 edition), to the quick uninstall
of vista (it broke our internal projects). The solid bedrock of Windows NT (becoming XP) and so on. The good news is Windows 10 seems very good indeed.
My questions are two:
1) Would the windows team recommend a closed environment development in my situation, and are they aware of other developers doing it (is it wise from your end)? Is their a pool, can we communicate directly?
or
2) Would you recommend an open environment instead? Every install is updated, everything is all on-line and networked, this may lead to more breakages and sacrifice the finished product.
The problem with approach number 2 is that a particular technology may work with this build, but not the next one and vice versa. I will constantly be playing "bunny hop" trying to make it work.
The problem with using number 1 is that you can have a "false dawn" view of the project, meaning you have managed to get it stable and develop code that fits that environment and build, but as soon as you do update six months later, it breaks due
to feature change, it means massive re-work, ultimately breaking the product again.
I have seen these approaches drown larger projects and wash away whole development teams.
Its a tough one and a part of my R&D but very soon I need to make a decision.
To explain more, some of the technology used will be:
Windows 10 Enterprise - Perforce - Office 365 with Exchange Activ Synch - Any associated Intel CPU and GPU monitors.
In other words very stable and solid technology. Their is about an equal number of other techs that are not so stable but I am slowly getting to work under Windows 10.All feedback would be given to Microsoft, regardless of environment 1 or 2.
Any advice and help from the Microsoft Team is greatly appreciated.
Yours Kindly,
Asad

I recently went to an Enterprise Mobility Summit Microsoft was holding at one of their facilities, and they spoke a bit about the future of Windows 10 - and here's what I left with: Microsoft isn't really sure themselves what kind of updating scheme they're
going to be doing with Windows 10. They had some ideas, but they're looking for feedback from enterprises and engineers about their plan.
I don't think it was under an NDA, so I should have no problem discussing it: their idea was to have different tracks (based on the user) with different upgrade schedules based on what the administrator deems appropriate for that user. For instance,
a consumer would have their OS automatically updated as soon as the update was available. while enterprises could stagger their users to a more manageable 3-month or 6-month schedule. Microsoft wasn't sure how long to make this stagger schedule - talk
of a 1 year stagger were floated, but nothing concrete. Critical devices, like POS or ATMs, could be setup so they would never be upgraded, or only upgraded when the administrator specifically allows them to be upgraded.
For you personally, it sounds like a closed development environment is better, since you're testing critical business applications. Again, one never knows exactly what direction Microsoft will take, but with the amount of conversations and...
warnings that dropped by various people at this meeting, it's pretty safe to say that they'll be some sort of timed release schedule for enterprises that you can prepare for.
Hope that helps!

I there any dependcy between Java Enterprise Edition and Java standard Edit

Hi Friends,
Is J2EE 1.4 uses Java SDK 1.4 or 1.5.Please reply as earlier as possible.It is urgent
Thanks
Bye

Each version of the Java EE platform must be able to run on the associated version of the Java SE platform. So, J2EE 1.4 must be able to run on J2SE 1.4 , Java EE 5 must be able to run on Java SE 5, etc. Note that this doesn't mean a particular implementation of Java EE can't be run with a more recent version of the JDK. For example, the J2EE 1.4 SDK can be run with J2SE 1.4 or Java SE 5. The key is that both the implementation of the Java EE platform and the applications written to that particular release of the platform must write to the corresponding Java SE version API. In other words, neither a J2EE 1.4 implementation nor a J2EE 1.4 application should make use of an API that was added in Java SE 5.
--ken

Java Enterprise Edition 6 Beta Testing

Until September 30, 2010, five Java EE6 beta exams are available for $50 USD:
http://blogs.oracle.com/certification/2010/09/0373.html

Seriously, these questions come at least two-three times a week. It isn't that hard you know.
- first check the list of requirements
- find books to match these requirements
Don't think that you'll cover it with one book. Amazon is a great source to find out which books are good through the user comments. If a book is really bad you'll know from there.
So why don't you browse a bit and if you have doubts between a few books to choose come back. At least then you have a specific problem to be helped with.

NW04s Java Full Edition Installation Problem

Hi All,
I am in the process of installing Netweaver 2004s SP7 sneak preview on Windows XP environment(standalone laptop - Pentium 1.8GHz, 1.5gb RAM, 80Gb HD). It gets stalled at Step 15 of 31 which is Creating database schema. Another interesting thing we noticed is that during this step is that CPU reaches 100%. It shows the below message in the Trace.
TRACE [iaxxejsexp.cpp:188]
EJS_Installer::writeTraceToLogBook()
Call block:Sdb_Schema_ind_ind_ind_ind
function:Sdb_Schema_ind_ind_ind_ind_SubComponentContainer_CreateDbSchema
is validator: false
This problem was already put by Tarun, but there is no detail on how he solved that problem.
Please help me in solving this problem.
Thanks
Sathish

Hi Satish,
I am also facing the same problem. We are using Windows XP Professional with 1GB RAM and 2.8 GHz processor. The task manager is showing 100% CPU usage. The SAPInst process is taking up 99% of the CPU load but only occupying 1M of RAM. The java process is taking up 107MB of memory. Do you by any chance found a solution to the problem?
Thanks,
Subhabrata

9926 Enterprise Edition Installation

Just upgraded my 9901 install to 9926 using the ISO. Total time was just
under 20 minutes and no problems with the install.
Paul Adare - FIM CM MVP
All that glitters has a high refractive index.

Hi Derek,
Thank you for your feedback.
I tested at my side and see the same result:
The version is 10.0.9926, for teh description and the Name part, we may take use of Windows Feedback tool to submit this.
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Application Server Enterprise Edition 8.1 2005Q1

Hi,
Has anyone successfully install Application Server Enterprise Edition 8.1 2005Q1 on HP-UX. I did a normal install with the below path set:
Application Server [u02/sjs/SUNWapp]
Data & Server Configuration: [u02/sjs/SUNWapp/appserver]
When the installation bar hits 100% the installation reported to have failed. Following is the error reported:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please wait while the installer upgrades and installs shared components...
Java Enterprise System
|-1%--------------25%-----------------50%-----------------75%--------------100%|
Installation Failed
No software was installed.
You can refer to the Troubleshooting chapter of the Java Enterprise System
Installation Guide to resolve the installation issues.
Enter 1 to view installation summary and Enter 2 to view installation logs
[1] {"!" exits} 1
Installation Summary Report
Install Summary
Java Enterprise System : Installation Failed
Sun Java(TM) System Application Server Enterprise Edition 8.1 2005Q1 : Installed
Configuration Data
Sun Java(TM) System Application Server Enterprise Edition 8.1 2005Q1 :
Domains and Instance Configuration Directory : /u02/sjs/SUNWapp/appserver
Application Server Installation Directory : /u02/sjs/SUNWapp
Enter 1 to view installation summary and Enter 2 to view installation logs
[1] {"!" exits} 2
Installation Log
Installing Java Enterprise System
Log file: /var/tmp/Java_Enterprise_System_install.B08120926
Installed:
/var/sadm/prod/entsys/uninstall_Sun_Java_tm__Enterprise_System_2005Q1.class
Uninstaller is at:
/var/sadm/prod/entsys/uninstall_Sun_Java_tm__Enterprise_System_2005Q1.class
Domain Administration Server
Installing Depot: sun-asuee
======= 08/12/05 17:38:52 mal BEGIN swinstall SESSION
(non-interactive) (jobid=mohrelx9-0433)
* Session started for user "root@mohrelx9".
* Beginning Selection
* Target connection succeeded for "mohrelx9:/".
* Source connection succeeded for
"mohrelx9:/tmp/.jes_CaChE/HPUX_PA-RISC/.install/..
/Product/application_svr/Packages/sun-asuee".
* Source:
/tmp/.jes_CaChE/HPUX_PA-RISC/.install/..
/Product/application_svr/Packages/sun-asuee
* Targets: mohrelx9:/
<--[33%]--[ENTER To Continue]--[n To Finish]--> {"!" exits}
* Software selections:
sun-asuee.sun-asuee,l=/u02/sjs/SUNWapp,r=8.1,a=HP-UX_B.11.11_32/64,
v=SUN
* Selection succeeded.
* Beginning Analysis and Execution
* Session selections have been saved in the file
"/.sw/sessions/swinstall.last".
* The analysis phase failed for "mohrelx9:/".
* Analysis and Execution had errors.
NOTE: More information may be found in the agent logfile using the
command "swjob -a log mohrelx9-0433 @ mohrelx9:/".
======= 08/12/05 17:38:58 mal END swinstall SESSION (non-interactive)
(jobid=mohrelx9-0433)
NOTE: The software "sun-asuee:/u02/sjs/SUNWapp" was successfully
marked, but it depends on the following software items which
could not be found in the source. However, these items may
already be in the target. This will be checked during the
<--[66%]--[ENTER To Continue]--[n To Finish]--> {"!" exits}
Analysis Phase: sun-asu sun-aswbcr
ERROR: "mohrelx9:/": The software dependencies for 1 products or
filesets cannot be resolved.
Error: Depot sun-asuee install failed.
Install complete. Depot: sun-asuee
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-asuee is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-asuee is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-asdemdb is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-asdemdb is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-ashdm is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-ashdm is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-asdem is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-asdem is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-asdb is not installed or
removed already
==> Skipping the uninstallation process as the sun-asdb is not installed or
removed already
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From the above error reported, it looks like some package error or missing. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks.

Is it really no one out there that has ever successfully install Application Server Enterprise Edition 8.1 2005Q1 on HP-UX 11i?

Oracle standard edition vs. enterprise edition

Hi all
Due to cost constraints, we have had to downgrade our 8i Database Enterprise Edition installation to Standard Edition.
My question is: do we have to re-create our database under Standard Edition, to make it a 'Standard Edition' database, or can we just re-open our existing database (created under Enterprise Edition) with the Standard Edition?
I installed 8i SE and opened our database but, of course, SELECT BANNER FROM V$VERSION suggests we're still running the EE.
Are we breaking the terms of our licence by using this existing database?
Very many thanks
Andrew

Hi!
My impression is during the database creation time, Oracle incorporates in data dictionary the options available for each product edition in that time.
Try to execute a specific operation that needs an E.E. license just like parallel query, advanced replication, and Partitioning.
Execute this query:
select * from v$option;
And compare to the Database Feature and Option Availability ( notes available on metalink ):
Differences Between Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition in 8i
Note:112591.1
Differences between Oracle 8.1.x Personal, Standard and Enterprise on NT/2000
Note:70059.1
As long as this is only my impression, try opening a SR to make it sure.
HTH
Best regards.
RK

Install problems - Java Enterprise System Directory Server on AS3.0

I'm trying to get the new 5.2p3 version of the DS installed, using the Java Enterprise System installer, but am having some problems. I've attempted to install this one two separate systems, both running RHEL AS3.0 Update 4 - one worked great, the other not so much.
On the system that failed, the install reported success, but it failed to create the appropriate directories for the instance (slapd-<instance>) or the scripts for the admin server (start-admin, stop-admin). It's like it's not actually creating the instance properly on this system (even though it works properly on the other).
Has anyone run into this, or have any ideas how to get this to install properly? I'm fairly new to this software, but this is driving me insane - two similar systems, same OS, very different results...
Any help would be most appreciated...

I had a similar problem with SuSE. You might want to make sure that no JRE is installed prior to your 10g Forms and Reports Server installation. I got rid of the OS installed JRE, and the 10g installation went fine.

Installation - Oracle 8.1.7 Enterprise Edition

I downloaded Oracle 8.1.7 release 3 Enterprise Edition. As its doc. says I wanted to install on my PC at home, which has Windows 2000 (Professional) OS. But, I'm facing strange problem. The setup.exe is not running at all and I'm not getting the first installation window. But, the same installation version in running well at my PC at work with with same OS. Can anybody tell me what could be the reason. Thanks
null

You could check out the discussion dated February 21, 2001. I think they had the same issues as you have.

Java Enterprise Edition Installation Issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for