JavaFX: looks great, but why not integrated in Java?

I browsed some JavaFX tutorials, read some articles and played with JavaFXPad. JavaFx looks great!
I did this because I heard about this new scripting language with tight Java integration. JavaFXPad and some others tools using JavaFx are written in Java. So why do we need a separate JavaFX interpreter/tool? I hoped to write some nice JavaFXScripts and just call them on all our computers that already have the Java 1.6 JRE installed.
Or is JavaFX just bleeding edge and is planned to be integrated in future JREs?

> 3rd party external "virtual machine".
Didn't bother read the link, did you? Don't bother answering that. I know you didn't because the very first sentence on the very first page tells you that Groovy is built for the JVM.
Oh, and regards to "third party external"...
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=2490
> Perhaps some day JavaFX Script will find its way into the JRE ...
Groovy's already there. Groovy scripts are compiled to bytecode and run on the JVM. I recommend actually reading the link. You might accidentally learn something. ;o)
~

Similar Messages

New features are great, but why not let us choose to not use them?

For example, would it be so difficult to allow us to turn off the wallpaper?
Or per my other thread, how about making it so it doesn't show us every email account twice? Once is enough, no?
Seriously, do Apple development teams not think about these things before pushing them out? I know Apple is used to it's sycophants, but not everyone likes the same things or works in the same way.

Thanks for the suggestion. Just submitted this to the feedback link:
I love my iPad. The whole family uses it.
I would love to be able to pin protect any app I choose on my iPad. My nine year old daughter uses my iPad regularly and I would love to be able to prevent her from using any app I choose. HBO Go is awesome, but I don't want her to be able to use it. Same with mail and netflix and many others.
Please, please please let us pin protect apps on the iPad!
It would be awesome if they implement this.

The update of web page iCloud is great, but why don't u just remove the "Notes" label from the "Mail" app?

The update of web page iCloud is great, but why don't u just remove the "Notes" label from the "Mail" app?
In additional, I also would like to see a "iOS liked" way to edit my "United contact" on the web page iCloud, just like on my iphone. That would be really great and more greater!
Anyway, thanks for your work!

frederickfromacworth wrote:
but the updated icons on the update page don't go away.
It's difficult to tell exactly what you mean, or where you are looking.
But if you're looking in the App Store on the iPad, in the Updates area, and you still see the icons, they presumably now say "Open" to the right instead of "Update". They will stay that way as a history of what you have done. They will disappear after a while - something like 30 days. That is fine.

When trying to import music files I get a error message that says "importer reported a generic error" I'm using windows 7, DellPC, installed premiere elements 13 2 days ago. Also when previewing and editing video,screen looks great but when I transfer to

When trying to import music files I get an error message Thea says "importer reported a generic error". Also when editing video, screen views look great but when I transfer to PC or flash drive video quality is very poor. Any suggestions?

chansen232
Premiere Elements 13 on Windows 7 (presumed 64 bit).....
1. Music files and error message...are these music files from iTunes? If so, convert them to .wav in iTunes to convert them to wav version, and then import the .wav version into Premiere Elements 13 project using Premiere Elements 13 Expert workspace's Add Media/Files and Folders/Project Assets from where you drag the wav version to the Soundtrack.
The following are the instructions for the iTunes converting
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT1550
If any problems with the instructions, please let me know, and I will go through them with you.
2. How you set up the project and the export settings that you select greatly influence your end product result.
a. What are the properties of the source media?
b. What project preset did you (manually) or the project (automatically) set to match the properties of the source media.
(If you do not know, please tell us what you see for the readings of Editing Mode, Timebase, Frame Size, Pixel Aspect Ratio - even
if the fields look grayed out.)
c. For your export...Publish+Share/Computer/and then what? And what preset? Did you use the default settings of the preset or did you
customize the export settings of the preset under the preset's Advanced Button/Video Tab and Audio Tab?
Let us start here and then decide what next.
Thanks.
ATR

Full screen is great but why take out my links bar?

Full screen is great but why take out my links bar?
Is there an option or customisation to show it in full screen mode.. I can understand taking out the file menu but that second delay is unpreciated to access links also.

Hi Atomic AI
can I achieve the opposite - I would like to start my full screen safari without the title bar, links bar or similar. just nothing except the content of the page - is this possible? I cant figure it out

My photos looked great but when I made a book they all appeared to be corrupted in the pdf preview?

My photos looked great but when I made a book in iphoto 09 they all appeared to be corrupted in the pdf preview? There is a white triangular shape with random horizontal lines running through each photo in the ibook preview. Took it to the Genius bar, after a week of fooling with it including wiping it clean and resinstalling the OS the same thing happens.

A LOT of them dont appear.
What do you see in the window when you click on those? A blank, black window? An exclamation mark? What?

HT1430 When the phone call from my iphone 5 will be in touch with another man, when my phone waiting to show view but why not?

When the phone call from my iphone 5 will be in touch with another man, when my phone waiting to show viewing but why not?

I'm sorry but your post doesn't make much sense in English. You may want to try posting again in your native language.
Best of luck.

Apt ant task suceeded but did not generate wrapper java/classes

Hi,
This is the first time I use apt task. Could someone help me out here.
Thanks.
Ant build suceeded but did not generate wrapper java/classes. Warning message I got is
[apt] warning: Bad annotation processor factory: java.lang.ClassCastException: com.sun.istack.ws.AnnotationProcessorFactoryImpl cannot be cast to com.sun.mirror.apt.AnnotationProcessorFactory
[apt] warning: Bad annotation processor factory: java.lang.ClassCastException: com.sun.istack.internal.ws.AnnotationProcessorFactoryImpl cannot be cast to com.sun.mirror.apt.AnnotationProcessorFactory
[apt] warning: Annotation types without processors: [javax.jws.WebService]
[apt] [total 725ms]
[apt] 3 warnings
I turned on verbose="true" and cut the command line apt -d .. -s ..
from the ant build output.
I executed that command line. Command suceeded, java/classes generated correctly. No warning
<target name="run_apt" depends = "build_config_classes">
<apt
     debug="true"
     verbose="true"
     destdir="${build_classes}"
sourcedestdir="${apt.generated.dir}"
sourcepath="${config.src}">
     <classpath refid="apt.classpath"/>
     <source dir="${config.src}">
     <include name="${config.pkg}/Configuration.java"/>
     </source>
</apt>
</target>

try adding fork=true to apt task

I exported a iphoto slideshow to desktop, converted it to mpg file by using BURN app, burned to DVD and exported to a USB flashdrive. The DVD looks great but flashdrive is extremely fuzzy. What is the difference and how can I make flashdrive sharper?

I exported an iphoto slideshow to desktop, converted it to mpg file by using the BURN app, burned it to a DVD and exported it to a USB flash drive. The DVD looks great and very sharp but the slideshow on the USB flash drive is extremely fuzzy. What is the difference and how can I make the slideshow on the flash drive look as sharp as the DVD?

Export the slideshow out of iPhoto as a QT movie file via the Export button in the lower toolbar. For iPhoto 9.4.3 and earlier select Size = Medium or Large. For iPhoto 9.5 and later selct 480p.
Open iDVD, select a theme and drag the exported QT movie file into the open iDVD window being careful to avoid any drop zones.
Follow this workflow to help assure the best quality video DVD:
Once you have the project as you want it save it as a disk image via the File ➙ Save as Disk Image menu option. This will separate the encoding process from the burn process.
To check the encoding mount the disk image, launch DVD Player and play it. If it plays OK with DVD Player the encoding is good.
Then burn to disk with Disk Utility or Toast at the slowest speed available (2x-4x) to assure the best burn quality. Always use top quality media: Verbatim, Maxell or Taiyo Yuden DVD-R are the most recommended in these forums.
If iDVD was not preinstalled on your Mac you'll have to obtain it by purchasing a copy of the iLife 09 disk from a 3rd party retailer like Amazon.com: ilife 09: Software or eBay.com. Why, because iDVD (and iWeb) was discontinued by Apple over a year ago.
Why iLife 09 instead of 11?
If you have to purchase an iLife disc in order to obtain the iDVD application remember that the iLife 11 disc only provides themes from iDVD 5-7. The Software Update no longer installs the earlier themes when starting from the iLIfe 11 disk nor do any of the iDVD 7 updaters available from the Apple Downloads website contain them.
Currently the only sure fire way to get all themes is to start with the iLife 09 disc:
This shows the iDVD contents in the iLife 09 disc via Pacifist:
You then can upgrade from iDVD 7.0.3 to iDVD 7.1.2 via the updaters at the Apple Downloads webpage.

Photo's sharpened in LR4 look great but terrible when exported.

What am I doing wrong?
I start with a great photo, it doesn't need much sharpening, just a bit to make it pop. It looks great in LR (photo is RAW) but then when I export it as a full sized Jpeg and put it into Blurb (because I'm making a photo album) it looks terrible. Strands of hair kind of look like dotted lines rather than smooth strands of hair and the edges of things look all pixilated. It didn't in LR even when magnified.
I've tried chaning my output sharpening to low.
I went back into LR and removed all sharpening (which makes the photo now look a little 'soft') and re-imported it and it looks much better but it no longer has that real beautiful sharp look like it did in LR.
How can I keep that sharp look?
Thanks.

345Alive wrote:
How would I get one of the pages into a file to print locally? I thought the Blurb pages were kind of stuck within their software so that even when I export the person printing would have to have Blurb software or something?
Hope that makes sense. I'd like to be able to do this just not sure how to go about it.
Thanks.
This whole discussion has been on the basis that you are usinf Blurb's Booksmart, yes?
If so, Booksmart>File>Print is the Blurb recommended way of locally proofing your book. By default it will print the whole book on whatever printer you have set up, but the print dialogue gives you the option under 'Print Range' to select select 'Pages' and one or more page numbers to limit the trial print to just one page.
Being curious, and having a wet morning to spare, I did a bit of playing around, and I think I have established to my complete satisfaction that these artifacts are purely a result of Booksmart scaling the image whilst in edit mode. I exported a jpeg at various sizes and with a variety of output sharpening options, and none of these displayed any visible artifacts when displayed in a variety of Windows viewing programs. I then imported these into Booksmart and placed them onto pages with a number of different sized image containers. Some of these showed jpeg artifacts, and some didn't but there was no apparent correlation to the original sizes or sharpening.
I then zoomed the Booksmart page using the slider at the bottom of the screen, and the artifacts increased / decreased / vanished as I did so, on all of the different pages, demonstrating that they were a function of Booksmart's scaling. I then printed one of the pages that was showing quite bad artifacts (using the technique above) and it was perfect!
The two images below show the same page at different zoom levels, with and without artifacts. (I don't know if this is going to work, because when I insert them into this message, they are re-scaled and both display artifacts - let's see wehat they look like when posted?).
Anyway - I'm confident that the case is proven!

If I rest my chin on the desk, the display looks great, but...

that's not a very comfortable way to work. I just bought this mbp 13" day before yesterday. It's the glossy display.
It's way too bright. burns right thru text. My ical is almost unreadable. So I tried adjusting the brightness and contrast. Doesn't work. If I open it up to the max, tho, and get my eyes level with the keyboard it looks great. Are they ALL like this? Is there anything I can do?

Some manufacturers seem to think brighter screens mean better screens, which to some extent is correct, however, the brightness I experienced with my original MBP C2D 15" was painful, it also helped show of the grainy/ shimmery effect quite beyond belief, inducing eye strain within minutes and migraine within 20 minutes use.
The 17" MBP I have now still has a bright screen, but nowhere near as bright as the 15". Bright enough, not grainy / shimmery.
Just goes to show occassionally, even Apple can get something right

Page looks great locally. online, not so much.

locally, the page below looks great - nice and centered and
everything. when i upload it and view it in safari, the main
content is way down and to the left (in safari) or centered but way
too deep (in firefox).
any ideas?
page in question: joequint.com/joe.html
thanks.

impatience is a virtue...
quote:
Originally posted by:
Newsgroup User
joeq wrote:
> still? looks good here when i move the window all
around...
Looks ok now....you were changing the code around faster than
I could
reply lol.
>
>
quote:
Originally posted by:
Newsgroup User
> Osgood wrote:
> > joeq wrote:
> >> yeah - that's already in there... no dice.
> >
> > Wasn't originally.
> >
> >
> >> any other thoughts?
> >>
> >> thanks.
> >
> > Works fine for me in Safari now you've added the
specific width to the
> > .flashContent, before it was off to the right.
> >
> > Looks identical in Firefox to Safari, every thing
centered in the
> > browser window.
> >
> > I'm on the Mac platform
>
>
> Humm its not quite central is it...I only noticed that
when I pulled the
> browser window wider.
>
> It has to be something to do with the Flash file itself
beacuse if you
> remove it and give your container a white border you
will see it is
> absolutely horizontally centered in the browser window.
>
>
>
>

What are the best instagram video settings using Compressor 4? The outputs I have created look clean HD in camera roll. When I view video in instagram preview it looks great, but then when i post it the quality gets blurry. Any advice?

I have read that you should resize the frame to 640 by 640 or 1000 x 1000, and have tried both. I shot the footage on canon 70d using 720p60fps, and edited the footage with iMovie. Its been frustrating to see the finished product look great on iPhone, iPad, or mac but once i post the video- the quality gets blurry when you focus on the faces that are in focus. My footage is basketball action shots from a high school game. Any advice would be huge, I been looking for an answer to this for a month.

Simple export a ProRes 422 file, upload that by itself. Facebook, Vimeo, YoutTube, etc, all compress the video themselves. So don't compress it first, just upload it and let them do their own compression.

Google talk works in internet explorer but why not in firefox

I have used google talk for a long time. it suddendly does not work in google chrome. i installed firefox just today. it does not let me use google talk. BUT
it works in internet explorer. I would prefer to use firefox.
I had reinstalled the plugin after a download message.
it is a new install.
It does not work.
Your volunteering is greatly appreciated.[sort of the nurses of the media world]

Hi, Google Talk was due to be turned off at the end of 2014, so that's probably why it isn't working - ''''On October 30th, 2014, Google announced on their Apps Updates blog that "The Google Talk app for Windows will continue to work for approximately two months before being turned off", signalling the end of the Google Talk application by the end of 2014'''' ''Quote from Wikipedia'' - [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Talk full text here.]

Preview Browser looks great, but it's a mess on the web

Hello,
I'm a novice dreamweaver girl, and just uploaded my site. I
did it with a template I designed, and when I preview it in
dreamweaver using firefox or internet explorer, it looks how I
hoped it would. But when I type in the url, the site is not at all
what it looks like in the preview. For example, in the preview, I
have a widget menu that's small and on the left side, but on the
web, the menu goes horizontally across the whole screen. Also, in
the preview, there are photos going down the right side of the
page, but on the web, the photos and the text come one after
another, with large amounts of space.
My basic questions are:
1. What am I doing wrong?
2. Why does the preview look okay and different from the web?
3. Does this have something to do with the template I used?
Thanks! Any advice would be appreciated!

Post a link to the page, please.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"aquadiva" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:ftg8i0$930$[email protected]..
> Hello,
> I'm a novice dreamweaver girl, and just uploaded my
site. I did it with a
> template I designed, and when I preview it in
dreamweaver using firefox or
> internet explorer, it looks how I hoped it would. But
when I type in the
> url,
> the site is not at all what it looks like in the
preview. For example, in
> the
> preview, I have a widget menu that's small and on the
left side, but on
> the
> web, the menu goes horizontally across the whole screen.
Also, in the
> preview,
> there are photos going down the right side of the page,
but on the web,
> the
> photos and the text come one after another, with large
amounts of space.
> My basic questions are:
> 1. What am I doing wrong?
> 2. Why does the preview look okay and different from the
web?
> 3. Does this have something to do with the template I
used?
>
> Thanks! Any advice would be appreciated!
>

JavaFX: looks great, but why not integrated in Java?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for