JDeveloper 11 and VSS Support?

The VSS Extension (available at sourceforge.net) does not work with JDev 11 (Just JDev 10). Are there plans for VSS Support in JDev 11, or am I better off convincing my management that JDeveloper projects should use either Subversion or CVS?
Edited by: klee on Oct 22, 2008 10:26 AM

This extension is open source - so you can take on the task of upgrading it to support JDeveloper 11g :-)
As for us at Oracle we don't have plans to do development around supporting VSS - we do have support for MS Team Studio though.
I would recommend that you push your managers towards using Subversion - the fact that it is a free tool and a very popular tool in the Java community should be enough of an argument - and the fact that the support in JDeveloper is built-in can be the cherry on the cake.

Similar Messages

  • Java API's supported in the Jdeveloper, IAS, and RDBMS product components

    If there are any technical errors or "mistatement of the facts" in this posting, please let me know about them ..
    This article is being delivered in Draft form and may contain
    errors. Please use the MetaLink "Feedback" button to advise
    Oracle of any issues related to this article.
    PURPOSE
    This article describes the "Enterprise Java Beans" (EJB), "Java Server Pages"
    (JSP) and servlets Application Programming Interfaces (API) supported by the
    Oracle products, Jdeveloper, Internet Application Server (IAS) and the Oracle
    RDBMS release 2 and release 3, also known as Version 8.1.6 and 8.1.7,
    respectively.
    SCOPE & APPLICATION
    All parties interested in the Java API's supported by these products.
    Java API's supported in the Jdeveloper, IAS, and RDBMS product components
    JDEVELOPER
    JDEVELOPER is Oracle's Java development tool designed for coding / development,
    testing / debugging, and deployment of Java Applications to the IAS and
    RDBMS platforms.
    With the java software api's being in a constant state of evolution, each new
    release of Jdeveloper adds support for the "then current" version of the java
    software api's, if it does not already have it implemented.
    JDEVELOPER SERVLET API JSP API EJB API
    VERSION VERSION VERSION VERSION
    3.2.X.X 2.2 1.1 1.1
    3.1.X.X 2.1 1.0 1.0
    NOTE :
    Sun Microsystems and their advisory teams (Oracle is on it) is working on
    "draft" specifications for the next version of all of these API's
    EJB -------> http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/index.html
    JSP -------> http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/index.html
    Servlets --> http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/?frontpage-javaplatform
    It is anticipated that future releases of Jdeveloper will continue to be
    upgraded to include support for the next version of each api.
    To obtain the latest information on Oracle's Internet Development Suite (IDS)
    of tools, please review the "Internet Developer Suite" information located
    on Oracle's technet web site at :
    http://technet.oracle.com/products/index.htm
    IAS
    IAS is Oracle's next evolution of the web server and application server
    product technology superceeding the Web Application Server (WAS) and Oracle
    Application Server (OAS) product lines.
    IAS SERVLET API JSP API EJB API EJE VERSION
    VERSION VERSION VERSION VERSION SUPPORTED
    9I(1.0.2) 2.2 1.1 1.1 817
    8i(1.0.1-NT) 2.0 1.0 1.0 816
    8i(1.0.0-UNIX) 2.0 1.0 1.0 816
    The IAS product contains two Java Virtual Machines (JVM) within it's
    architecture.
    They are called :
    1) APACHE JSERV servlet engine
    2) ORACLE ENTERPRISE JAVA ENGINE (EJE)
    APACHE JSERV servlet engine
    The APACHE JSERV servlet engine is an EXISTING product licensed from the
    apache group which supports the servlet api 2.0.ONLY.
    The APACHE JSERV product does not support ANY JSP's unless the customer
    installs a third party jsp engine.
    The IAS 8i/9i which has the APACHE JSERV product embedded in it, comes with
    Oracle's JSP engine (OJSP) already integrated into it. OJSP supports JSP's up
    to the specific JSP engine version documented in the Oracle Universal
    Installer (OUI) for the 8.1.7 RDBMS or the IAS products. It is also documented
    in the product's release notes.
    Oracle ENTERPRISE JAVA ENGINE (EJE)
    The EJE formerly known as :
    1) Oracle 8i Java Virtual Machine (JVM)
    2) JSERVER component,
    3) Aurora JVM
    was originally releas ed in the RDBMS 8.1.5 database with jdk 1.1.6 based java
    support.
    The currently supported versions of the Oracle 8i RDBMS, versions 2 and 3,
    also known as Version 8.1.6 and 8.1.7, respectively, provides a jdk 1.2.1
    based java virtual machine support.
    "EJE" Version 816
    This EJE, found in rdbms 8.1.6 and IAS 8i, contains support for the ejb
    api 1.0, corba, and java stored procedures.
    "EJE" Version 817
    This EJE, found in rdbms 8.1.7 and IAS 9i, contains support for the ejb,
    corba, and java stored procedures as well as the Oracle Servlet Engine (OSE)
    which provides support for the servlets 2.2 api and JSP 1.1 api.
    Note :
    EJB support in the "EJE" Version 817 has been upgraded to comply with the EJB
    1.1 api specification which includes "entity beans" support.
    What is the bottom line ??
    1) Servlets deployed to the APACHE JSERV must comply with servlet api 2.0.
    2) Servlets 2.1 or higher are only supported in EJE's OSE component found in
    the rdbms 817 or ias 9i products. Servlets api 2.0 can also run in the OSE.
    References
    1) "Oracle9i Application Server Technical White Paper" located at :
    http://technet.oracle.com/products/ias/pdf/9ias_102.pdf
    2) "Whats New? Oracle8i JVM Accelerator, Oracle Servlet Engine, OracleJSP ..."
    located at :
    http://technet.oracle.com/products/oracle8i/pdf/504.pdf
    3) "Oracle8i Release 3 New Features Summary" located at :
    http://technet.oracle.com/products/oracle8i/pdf/8iR3_nfs.pdf
    null

    which jvm is used by jserv ?? EJE or a separate jdk ?
    The Jserv servlet engine is running in a separate jdk JVM external to the EJE jvm which is embedded within the "database" component of ias and the RDBMS.
    See the reference below for more details ...
    if jserv only support old apis, why it is in oracle's products ?
    i would assume that the oracle servlet engine was under development when ias 8i was released and became available in time for the ias 9i and rdbms 817 products.
    looking back in history leads me to believe ias 8i was a migration path to get to ias 9i or rdbms 817.
    Based upon the long history of new releases of every oracle product being upgraded with new features, it's reasonable to assume that these products will continue to evolve.
    when I deploy a jsp how to deploy in the right servlet container ("EJE") ?
    as documented in the reference below, you can deploy JSP's to either the apache jserv jvm or the EJE since the ORACLE JSP engine functionality is in both jvm's.
    there are many posts where you can see that people have deploy in jserv and they have problems because they don't use the right container (servlet 2.0 instead of
    servlet 2.2) http://technet.oracle.com:89/ubb/Forum2/HTML/006349.html
    when ias 8i came out this was clearly an issue since servlet support was at api 2.0, and the current servlet api was probably at 2.1.
    oracle clearly made every effort to get ias 9i released quickly to supply a servlet 2.1 and 2.2 capable engine to resolve this issue.
    since ias 9i and rdbms 8.1.7 are available this is no longer an issue.
    The reference below explains the architecture and understanding it would eliminate a lot of "deploy to the wrong ias 9i component" issues.
    so why jserv is bundled with oracle 8i/9ias since EJE support the right api version ?
    if in ias 9i release , oracle had removed the jserv component without any advance warning, many customers would have been very upset since oracle makes every attempt to give advance notice before removal of functionality.
    References
    1) "Oracle9i Application Server Technical White Paper" located at :
    http://technet.oracle.com/products/ias/pdf/9ias_102.pdf

  • JDeveloper, ADF, lack of support and bleak future

    Hi,
    I'm a seasoned Java and .NET developer, used to many environments and frameworks. A happy user of Oracle databases.
    For a very Oracle oriented client I started with a team of developer a project using JDeveloper (no choice). After 4 months of using JDeveloper, ADF to build web sites, here are some thoughts I would like to share. This remarks only focus on that products, because I have a lot of respect for the Oracle databases and had a lot of success with them.
    I am starting to get depressed about the very few blogs (most from Oracle) talking about JDeveloper and ADF, the lack of books, and the Oracle forums.
    Moreover, most of the time you never get an answer to your problems, sometimes untested not working 'solutions', and a very very few times a working solution. Help is sparse, the community is missing.
    If Oracle wants to promote its framework, it has to boost the number of tutorials, examples and support.
    Googling about ADF is most of the time a non sense since you always land on the same 3 blogs and the Oracle forums.
    Proof of non use by the community ?
    If you try on www.indeed.com to find statistics about JDeveloper or ADF jobs you get another frightening proof.
    Sometimes you find a piece of code or a tutorial that may help, but you realize it works only on some specific release of JDeveloper.
    What makes me angry is when you ask why your code works on the x.x.x.x version but not the newest version, and the only answer you get is stay with x.x.x.x version (I won't bother to fix your 10 lines or code or even give you a direction to do it (maybe coz I don't understand myself were the breaking changes are)).
    JDeveloper is damn too slow ? You should have a dual-core and at least 2 Go of memory, you poor thing ! Is Java for rich people ?
    Debuging is a nightmare. Compared to Eclipse or others it is not practical at all.
    I'm happy when I can create a few pages drag and dropping controls. Business components are also a good thing. It speeds up my development. But since development is not just UI and generating business components, I lose a lot of time every time I want to write code, every time I do something "exotic" it becomes a pain in the ass.
    My problem here is that the architecture and JDeveloper constraint the developer a lot. I don't even talk about the fact that everything is only Oracle database oriented (openess ?). Even changing your page layout is a pain. Positioning controls is non trivial. As a whole, I would say that this whole thing imposes you to adapt to it, it doesn't adapt to you and your way of working.
    Most results I saw look like the Oracle websites.
    I could go on about the various bugs and problems that plague JDeveloper. Like the refactoring (when usable) that leave old and annoying stuff in your model XML, like the bugs in the diagrams, like problems related to auto-binding on the page and manually changing controls ID, various synchronization problems between pages and backing beans, adding upload is a mess, OrdDomain types are buggy, regions doesn't work well in the designer, and so on...
    My point is that I feel the whole thing is not mature. And Oracle seems to fix some issues with the release of JHeadStart. Sometimes you fix things by integrating JHeadStart stuff. JHeadStart is probably a great thing and a time saver if you don't do too much "exotic" screens and code, but does it means that JDeveloper+ADF and classic development becomes a second class citizen ?
    This is sad, since the ADF framework and JDeveloper look good and are worth of a more widespread usage. But marketing and support are way way far behind other commercial and open-source solutions. When I see what is planned for JDeveloper 11 and I compare it to others (Java or not). When I look at the developers needs and expectations, I feel we are losing the race.
    Maybe Oracle would like to hand over some of the framework to the community, but my feeling is that the community is already commited on other exciting and less constraining frameworks and tool, and this community may well work in a way that doesn't fit Oracle vision. Future will tell.
    Cheers.

    Hi,
    thanks for the detailed comment. I appreciate the time you spent writing this up as this helps to improve the product. Below is a first - quick and brief response to some of your statements.
    ... for documentation and tutorials
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/learnadf.html
    Especially the ADF Developer Guide for 4 GL developers earns a lot of praise among J2EE developers.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B25947_01/toc.htm
    ... for books
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/java/jsf.html
    Sometimes you find a piece of code or a tutorial that may help, but you realize it works only on some specific release of JDeveloper. What makes me angry is when you ask why your code works on the x.x.x.x version but not the newest version, and the only answer you get is stay with x.x.x.x version
    Of course samples need to be created to some point in time with a specific version. We have SRDemo as our main - maintained - reference demo I suggest you download this sample from OTN using help--> check for updates. Note that SRDemo contains code solutions for most developer cases and also is available in 10.1.3.1
    I'm happy when I can create a few pages drag and dropping controls. Business components are also a good thing. It speeds up my development. But since development is not just UI and generating business components, I lose a lot of time every time I want to write code, every time I do something "exotic" it becomes a pain in the ***.
    What is exotic, and what are the questions you didn't get an answer for ? I see that this is your first posting on OTN, so I am wondering under which account you posted the other questions that did not get an answer.
    Googling about ADF is most of the time a non sense since you always land on the same 3 blogs and the Oracle forums. Proof of non use by the community ?
    Isn't OTN a community ? I don't think that we need another discussion forum and looking at OTN it appears very active.
    I don't even talk about the fact that everything is only Oracle database oriented (openess ?).
    Not true. Please prove your claim.
    Even changing your page layout is a pain. Positioning controls is non trivial. As a whole, I would say that this whole thing imposes you to adapt to it, it doesn't adapt to you and your way of working. Most results I saw look like the Oracle websites.
    Now you are barking up the wrong tree, blaming ADF for what is JavaServer Faces layouting. You don't have to use JSF but can go for JSP /Struts and/or Swing development. What is the view layer technology of your choice that allows you to do better layouting ?
    I could go on about the various bugs and problems that plague JDeveloper
    Yes, please post them all
    ... regions doesn't work well in the designer, and so on...
    Of course, because regions are not officially supported. JDeveloper 11 - I know you don't want to hear future - will have full templating (going far beyound of what facelets do) and region support
    My point is that I feel the whole thing is not mature. And Oracle seems to fix some issues with the release of JHeadStart.
    JHeadstart is a consulting offering and not meant to fix the product.
    ... but does it means that JDeveloper+ADF and classic development becomes a second class citizen ?
    No comment for this statement as it is based on a wrong observation
    This is sad, since the ADF framework and JDeveloper look good and are worth of a more widespread usage. But marketing and support are way way far behind other commercial and open-source solutions. When I see what is planned for JDeveloper 11 and I compare it to others (Java or not).
    Note that only a fraction of new features in JDeveloper 11 leaked out so far or have been mentioned in the recent statement of direction. JDeveloper has many more features that we don't yet promote because the software isn't available.
    Please note that we give ADF to the community. Its just we are not giving it to the open soutce community but the J2EE community (JSR-227)
    Frank

  • VSS support

    I've just started evaluting JDeveloper and like it so far. One thing I was wondering is if there are any Visual Source Safe support - something I need to have unfortunately.
    I only find CVS as default and Google didn't help me out there, maybe someone here knows about it?
    Best regards
    Stefan

    No VSS support right now.
    We do have support for CVS, Clearcase, Perforce, and Serena Dimension.
    (see the help->check for updates).
    Support for Subversion and Windows Team Server is being developed right now.
    For a simple way to integrate with third party version control tools see this one:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/101/howtos/extools/subversion.html

  • Jdeveloper version and ADF runtime on weblogic

    Hi
    I would need to understand the link between the jdeveloper version and the Weblogic version.
    Based on this article http://tompeez.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/jdeveloper-versions-vs-weblogic-server-versions/
    it sounds like the server version to use is directly linked to the version of ADF used for the development. It is true?
    Specially is it true that there is not backward compatibility. A new weblogic server would not support a application that would have been developed with a older version of jdeveloper?
    At the end I would like to get all my weblogic servers on the same version and as much possible on the newest version but if I need to rework the applications that were developed on a previous version of ADF , that can be really time consuming.
    I would need best practice ideas .
    When I have various projects oven a two -three years period how should we deal with keeping up with the new versions of weblogic and jdeveloper?
    An another question I have is regarding the ADF run time. What is so special about it comparing to a regular set of libraries?. Why can I not deploy it as part of my application? Or is it possible and it is a better path then?
    FInal point, I have a application that was developed with jdeveloper 11.1.1.0 and run on weblogic 10.3.0.0 . I would like to migrate to jdeveloper 11.1.1.4. I already converted the project with jdeveloper 11.1.1.4. What should I do next? What testing should I do to verfy the conversion worked? Should I update the weblogic server to 10.3.4 or can I go with a newer version like 10.3.5?
    Thanks

    Ok but then if you don't migrate and you are in a environment with also new development you are going to need many different servers no?
    One welogic server for jdevleoper 11.1.0.0
    One weblogic server for jdeveloper 11.1.2.0
    One weblogic server for jdeveloper 11.1.3.0
    One weblogic server for jdeveloper 11.1.4.0
    How often should you migrate then because if you don't update you could be very behind after a couple of years and may be the migration could be almost impossible at that point.
    We still have applications that where developed for oc4j 10 g and migration is almost rewrite at this point. (only after 3 years).
    At the end, you get servers dedicated to some applications instead of having a stack of multi purpose servers.
    Also let say you are starting with a project that is going to take two years, you start the developement with jdeveloper 11.1.5.0 and in two years it will jdeveloper 13.1.1.0. How do you manage this? You stay with 11.1.5.0?
    We noticed that getting support for 10 g is really difficult at this point. Many people don't know anymore about 10 g and you don't get bug fix. If you don't get bug fix, how can you survive with your old version?
    I know that ADF is not only about the face part, I 've been using the business services too but under ADF it is J2EE and then why ADF does not come as a set of libraries that you can link to in your J2EE project instead of becoming a server centric runtime?
    People went to J2EE to get plateform independent, with ADF you are becoming server dependant. ADF is supposed to do better than .net but if you look at .net the IDE actually support old and new frameworks. If you get to develop on a older framework you can still use the new IDE. Also you can install several versions of the framework on the same server with .net.
    From what I can read ADF is not even supported on JBOSS anymore so give me argument to choose ADF as a enterprise solution? Is it really the future?

  • Does JDeveloper 9.0.2 support EJB2.0?

    By default, it generates EJB1.1 code, Does JDeveloper 9.0.2 support EJB2.0?

    JDeveloper 9.0.3 supports EJB 2.0. The preview release of JDeveloper 9.0.3 is available from OTN, and the production version is expected in the next couple of weeks.
    -- Brian

  • Is VSS supported in Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.2?

    Is VSS supported in Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.2?

    VSS support (converting standalone switches into a VSS)  was introduced with LMS 3.0.1 if I remember well and it is still there in LMS 4.2 (Cisco Prime Infrastructure):
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_lan_management_solution/4.1/user/guide/configuration/configvss.html
    Config Mgmt is supported, also.

  • JDeveloper 10g and Struts Page Flow

    Hello,
    First of all, I'd like to congratulate JDev Team for providing us with this amazing new tool.
    I am evaluating JDeveloper 10g and its Struts/Tiles integration, since we are now selecting the IDE to be used by our company in its projects.
    I noted the following: In Struts Page Flow, the component pallete does not have a component do represent a Tiles definition.
    I'd like to know if there are plans to include such a component, considering that this is crucial to our projects.
    If not, could you please provide us with directions to do so ?
    I am looking forward to your reply.
    Thanks a lot !
    Juarez Junior
    SCPJ2/SCWCD/SCBCD
    Unisys Global Outsourcing

    Juarez,
    You are quite correct that the visual Struts modeling does not support tiles yet. Rest assured that it's on the list of features we're working on.
    What that means is that you're not going to visualise the links / submits from the tiles themselves.
    However, the tiles taglib is available in the visual JSP editor so you should have no problem creating tiles content.
    Likewise you can create the relevant plug-in entries for tiles by right clicking on the Struts Config node in the Structure Pane (when the struts-config or the diagram is selected) and from the new menu you'll see plug-in.
    The final option is of course to edit the XML directy should you want to.

  • I am having difficulty: we are running a windows server 2003 - mail and outlook support 2007 and upwards, how do I get the brand new apple machines to work with the 2003 version of server

    I am having difficulty: we are running a windows server 2003 - mail and outlook support 2007 and upwards, how do I get the brand new apple machines to work with the 2003 version of server

    I may be way out, but do you know about this product, would it help integrate the Macs for you.
    https://www.thursby.com/sites/default/files/images/ADmitMacv8_SPD.pdf

  • IMAC's Top graphics card frustration - Cheap and no support for Adobe Mercury Playpack Engine GPU Acceleration?

    If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
    Please, if you have a solution for me, let me know. Otherwise I find it pretty frustrating that I purchased a top-end iMAC, fully maxed-out in every way possible, and that the iMac doesn't support Adobe Premiere's Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration. Also, an old USB 2.0 Hub and thus the built-in SD card reader is slow. If you have SD cards with 95MB/s Transfer, Read and Write speeds, the iMAC will only transfer at around 30MB/s if you're lucky. Technically 480Mbs which is around 50MB/s but I haven't seen those speeds.
    I figured this could at least be circumvented with a Thunderbolt SD card reader or a Thunderbolt to USB 3.0 adapter but of course no such thing exists.
    Well, nothing with a reasonable price tag. This all might seem trivial to some but when you're uploading 24 hours of HD video footage from a 128GB SDXC card, the speed makes a big difference.
    And come on, no BluRay support? Ridiculous. I get the politics of why but still, just ridiculous. It would be nice to be able to burn a BluRay to watch in my home theater system. There are other methods but BluRay is convenient and great for backing up large Video Files. Unfortunately BluRay looks like it's not going to make it.  Maybe cable distribution companies will increase their Internet upload speeds one day and I can just store everything in the cloud and watch full length movies(that I've created) on Vimeo.
    Anyways, I went and took a look at the hardware Apple stuffed inside my fancy (3.4 Ghz i7, 16GB 1333 DDR3, 2GB AMD 6970M, 256 GB SSD Internal and 2TB 7200 Internal) machine and it appears to be pretty middle of the range stuff. It's an iMAC, not a Mac Pro so why am I griping? Because my 2009 PC(which I tricked out over the last two years) is faster and does support the Mercury Playback Engine. I spent $2100 total on this PC which includes all my upgrades. I spent around $3300 on the iMAC. I feel ripped off.
    Yes, I do love my iMAC on multiple levels but had I known my dated 2009 PC would render video projects faster, I would have gone with a MAC Pro or just a new PC. It seems that Mac is moving completely away from making high-end computers for niche markets(video editing) and focusing on their tiny laptops, IPADS and IPhones for the masses. Obviously smart from a capitalistic perspective(at present at least) but very frustrating for some.
    I was actually told to purchase a MAC for video editing. I've been a PC guy for 15 years. I went with the iMAC because I had read many good things about it(probably just Apple propaganda)  and also the MAC PRO was to be discontinued. Also the MAC Pro would have been triple the cost for what didn't seem like a whole lot more.
    It's one's thing to prepackage a computer with inferior hardware(the iMAC I have is fast for most things and more than enough for 99% of the population) but to not allow us to pop open the computer and make a quit upgrade to the machine is what really makes me feel like I'm using a computer built for Grannies. I mean there is a reason my mother loves iMacs and Iphones. Amazing that I was able to upgrade my memory from 4 to 16GB  but I've heard Apple has even done away with that. I get why they do it. Apple Warranty, Apple Care issues, Profit and World Domination: Apple wants a monopoly on everything.
    Was great to see Adobe bounce back after the whole Flash/HTML5 thing and knock Final Cut Pro off the face of the Earth for good. People are still buying it b/c of the brand name but Final Cut is done. David Fincher used Adobe's Workflow for everything when he made The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo. Hollywood is making the shift and the world will follow. The Adobe Workflow has finally come together and there is just no way Apple can compete with Adobe Creative Cloud and an Engine that can just swap from Premiere to After Effects to Prelude to SpeedGrade to Photoshop to Story with speed for $29 bucks a month(or $49 for some). Apple better start supporting Adobe's Mercury Engine or they may have a problem. And if you're using Final Cut X, you're severely handicapping yourself. Problem is that people don't want to take the time to learn Adobe's products(steep learning curve for sure) which is where Apple's Granny software, and perhaps computers, comes in to play. Arnold Schwarzenegger once said "Milk is for babies, Real Men Drink Beer".  I'm beginning to think that "Mac's are for Grannies, Real Men Use Adobe and PCs".
    The major problem with Apple is you're forced to use Apple. Not sure but history has proven that people don't like to be forced into anything. Autocracies don't work. These systems eventually topple, even in the corporate world.
    Amazon.com, now that's the company to emulate. What an amazing machine!
    I've read that Apple may even discontinue the iMAC after 2013. Who knows?
    If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
    1) Graphcis Card  - AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2048 MB (6990 would have been better or something from NVIDIA.
    2) USB 2.0 Hub with only 480 Mb/sec
    3) Seagate Baracude SATA I 7200 RPM drive with 3GB/s transfer rate and only a 32 GB Cach. It's ok. I would have expected at least a Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB SATA III 7200 RPM 64 MB  or the Velociraptor at 10,000RPM.
    4)APPLE SSD TS256C  Flash Drive. As you can see, it doesn't stack up so well against other SSD Drive.
    Just average. http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/hdd_lookup.phphdd=APPLE+SSD+TS256C

    Whining and ranting about how iMacs can't do this or iMacs/orMacs can't do that is not going to get you a lot of help here.
    Your "I love my MAC" is typical of the ever ubiquitous PC whiner.
    If your video work needs were that computer intensive and critical , you should've done some online research and you should have budgeted for a Mac Pro.
    Mac Pros are completely expandable and upgradeable unlike the iMac.
    Mac Pros have much more faster and more CPU cores than the iMac line.
    iMac line is limited to CPUs with 8 cores. The Mac Pros, I believe, are up to 16 core CPUs, now.
    The Mac Pros can have their GPU upgraded and you even add/expand to use specialty audio/video cards.
    Mac Pros are the defacto standard for real video work.
    iMacs, even the high end model, is not really designed to do really heavy and intensive video work.
    iMacs do do video creation and editing. Just not on the level that is needed from a more "Pro" computer.
    It seems to me you are asking your iMac to do more than it was originally designed for, in terms of professional video editing.
    You get a lot more out of a Mac Pro than an iMac for any real serious video, CGI or animation work.
    You just didn't want to spend that much cash on one.
    iMacs are not user upgradeable or friendly to user upgrades at all!!!
    If you purchased a Mac Pro, you could've had that better, faster HD, better faster SSDs.
    That said, I can offer no real help to but because of the nature of your post and the fact you just simply annoyed me, I feel some advice and explanations are in order
    First off, you picked Adobe video editing software suite as your video creation software on the Mac.  It's no secret to long-time video content creators on the Mac that Adobe products, especially those for video creation and editing are very user unfriendly on the Mac. Even though Macs are supported from Adobe, Adobe for a long time has treated the Mac and Mac users as second class citizens.
    Before purchasing and installing Adobe Premiere, did you even check Adobe's site for the preferred system hardware and software requirements? Hmmm?
    This is why you should KNOW what software you are going to be running on a computer first then research what computer make and model will run said software.
    That's why Apple has its own apps like Aoerture, Logic and Final Cut.
    Despite your ignorance in this matter, Final Cut Pro X is alive and doing well, thank you, and using this software on your iMac would kick Adobe Premier in the you know whats.
    Final Cut Pro X is a complete video solution for and completely designed around the Mac.
    Why are you using USB 2.0 connections for video work when you have a perfectly good FireWire 800 connection.
    In case you are not aware, FireWire 800 is called so because it has a max throughput of 800 Mbps.
    Your 2011 iMac can take up to 32 GBs of RAM. Not just 16 GBs.
    This changed when the 2010 model iMacs came out.
    Blu-ray? I believe you can buy external Blu-ray writers that work with Mac using said FW800 connection.
    So you cite one movie and one videographer using Adobe Premier for your premise that Final Cut is dead in Hollywood?
    Your argument that Apple locks you into everything in their world can be countered by saying Windows and Windows PCs lock you into the Windows world. What's your point?
    Apple is not discontinuing their computers platforms any time soon.
    All you are regurgitating is rumor. Probably from all of the PC crowd.
    iMacs and professional desktop Macs are not going anywhere.
    Currently, Apple is the only desktop/laptop computer maker that is still making a profit on their Macs and increasing their market share percentages for the last 5 years during which the PC market has continually slumped/dropped in its market share.

  • Mp3 and j2me supporting reliance mobile

    hi,
    if anyone know abt mp3 and j2me supporting Reliance phone in market.if so please give me the link where to get teh details I already checking it with reliance website and i want more information please help me.
    thanx in advance
    laxmi

    hi laxmi
    i dont know did you check this URL
    www.dadp.com
    there is one forum also avail for the j2me and realience phone you will get all the information tehre
    regards
    [email protected]

  • Windows Vista 64 Bit and Button Support - Qosmio G30?

    Windows Vista 64 Bit and Button Support?

    Everybody claiming that Vista x64 (or Ultimate) can't be used with FN keys or Flash Cards is utterly wrong!
    I have a Qosmio G30 running Vista x64 Ultimate, and have both FN keys, Toshiba Flash Cards and (partly) the hardware buttons at the top working.
    After a lot of research, I found that Toshiba has released a 64-bit version of VAP called util_tvap_27581D. If you google it, you might discover it...

  • IPAD MINI RETINA SCREEN VERSION IOS 7.1.2 can't success download apps , need to reboot every times only can download apps. Is iOS problem or hardware issue.? Local agent switch sale and tech support can't fix my problem.

    I Purchase iPad mini retina screen on July 7 2014 at Malaysia local apple sale agent switch store somehow now my iPad did restore to latest iOS 7.1.2, before that and after also facing 1new issue is my iPad mini cant success download apps and error message show can't download at this time, either retry or click done. My internet is good condition no line down, I reboot my iPad only can download but sometime can't need to reboot twice only can download. Very sad local sale and tech support can't help to solve my problem...

    Reset the device:
    Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button together for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    If that doesn't help, tap Settings > General > Reset > Reset All Settings
    If that doesn't help, tap Settings > General > Reset > Reset Network Settings
    You will have to re enter your Wi-Fi password.
    No data is lost due to a reset.
    If nothing above helped, try here >  iOS: Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections

  • MacBook Crash and Apple Support

    Not sure if anyone else has had this experience. First, I am a brand new Mac user. Bought the new MacBook Pro i7 with 8GB of RAM as a switch from my PC laptops.
    Any other big crashes out there? Just wondering if there is a systemic hardware issue?
    I had the new laptop for a total of 4 days before it crashed hard. on the first full day of use, it started crashing with the veil of grey and the message that a serious error had occurred and I needed to hold down the power button to restart. It crashed a total of 6 times in 4 days (2 days of real use) before I could get to the Genius Bar.
    They stated that was obviously not normal and that I should request a new unit from AppleCare, which I did as an advanced replacement. I was hoping to keep my crashing laptop just to get more used to the Mac. However, after the Genius Bar did an archive re-install, the computer immediately crashed twice while in the store.
    We then attempted to do an Erase and Install, and the unit would not install the fresh load of Mac OS X. The Genius Bar rep said it definitely looked like a hardware issue since it would not re-install the software, so I had to send the unit back ahead of receiving a replacement.
    As for customer service, there was absolutely no urgency to get a replacement laptop to me. It was a customized unit and it is finally due to arrive today, but it has taken 10 days since I ordered my advanced replacement.
    I will tell you that this has been a very frustrating and disappointing start to my Mac usage. And customer support could have made that bad experience so much better, but their lack of action and mis-statements actually made it worse.
    Sorry, I was hoping for a much better experience. I am still hoping that IF the second MacBook works I can see that I made the right decision.
    LewieE

    Hi A Brody,
    Lemons do happen and while that was a disappointment, the Genius Bar guys did a great job. I will say my expectations were higher for Apple based on everything I heard trying to make my decision to swap from a PC.
    The first customer service rep I spoke to when I setup the advanced replacement stated that this unit would be put at the head of the que as it was a replacement for defective unit. The second rep I spoke with said advanced replacements have the lowest priority and it should have been returned as a zero dollar replacement and by him changing it to that, especially since my return unit had been received, would cause it to jump to the head of the shipments. The third person I spoke to said it just had to be processed in the normal 5-7 day shipping replacement and there was nothing they could do.
    When a customer has a problem, customer service can make or break that experience. In fact, customers that have had a problem and had a positive resolution to that problem are shown to be more loyal than customers that have never had a problem at all.
    Regards,
    LewieE

  • You have to love HP products and their customer service and technical support

    My daughter has one of your ZV5000 notebooks. She has been very happy with it until the last few months when she started having charging issues. After investigation I found out that HP had a class action suit over this very problem. I called customer support and I emailed customer support trying to get HP to live up to it's obligation and fix it. I got no where and after several hours I gave up. She decided to get a new notebook. She bought a Compact Presario CQ50-130US from Staples. When she got it home she tried to connect to my wireless router and couldn't. We called technical support and spend the following 2 hours trying to get it to connect. I spoke to several techs none of which knew what they were talking about. They would read step by step from some try this if that doesn't work try this directions they must have. If that wasn't bad enough we constantly had to ask for it to be repeated because we couldn't understand them. They spoke English but with such heavy accents you couldn't understand what they were saying. The last tech was going to call Comcast my internet provider. I told him they provided the internet service not the router. He couldn't understand that. After keeping me on the phone for 15 minutes he came back to say he couldn't get threw and would call me back when he did. There customer service must be as good as yours is to get threw to. I got a call 24hrs later to ask if everything was alright. They never fixed the problem how could it be alright? By then she had decided to return the new one and buy a product other than HP or Compact. I would up fixing her old laptop something HP should have paid for but didn't. I have always trusted and respected the HP name. I am very sorry to see what it has become to stand for. Inferior products that you don't stand behind and customer and technical support that can't speak English and don't have a clue as to what they are doing. How sad! Do you think any of my family or friends will be buying an HP product?

    well, this IS a means of finding a resolution for some issues. so why SHOULDNT they read this forum? i can assure you that there are people who are not just reading stuff off a book or a document. in fact, that is the biggest cliche's that exists today.
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions, by marking my answer with \'Accept as Solution\' if it solves your problem.
    Click on the BLUE KUDOS button on the left to say "Thanks"
    I am an ex-HP Employee.

Maybe you are looking for