Jdk 1.4 support for websphere studio 5.1

I am using Websphere application studio version 5.1 which uses jdk1.3 and not 1.4. My project requirement forces me to use jdk 1.4 swing components as 1.4 swing version has lot more than that of 1.3 (for e.g. masking for input field and lot more). Does anyone have an idea how can i use 1.4 (at least swing) into websphere application studio 5.1 (which uses jdk 1.3)?? or does anyone know how can i point/force websphere studio to use jdk version 1.4?
I would highly appreciate any pointers/reference material or anything like that.
Thanks,
Vicky

mriyer,
The Windows binaries in 2.3.10 were built using JDK 1.5 and did not use a -target 1.4 flag. You did the right thing by rebuilding.
Regards,
George

Similar Messages

  • Which JDK is JSF supported for?

    Is JSF Supported for JDK 1.3.1_03?

    I think it's more of a J2EE SDK support issue and I think (but am not sure) you need J2EE1.4.
    You may want to try this question on the Sun Java Studio Creator forum:
    http://swforum.sun.com/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=123
    Probably not the most appropriate forum, but more correct than this forum which is focused on the Sun Web Application Framework (JATO).
    craig

  • JDK is NOT supported for 7.1 anymore?

    I get the info that for whatever 7.1 (e.g. PI7.1, BI7.1, etc.),  JDK is NOT supported anymore.
    SAP JVM is installed during the upgrade to 7.1 .
    Is that true?    Thanks!!

    Hi Ashley,
    This is true. You can refer the same in product availability matrix (PAM) under https://service.sap.com/pam
    Cheers........,
    Raghu

  • Support for Websphere 7

    Do we have a service pack for BO XI 3.1 which now or in future will support Websphere 7.
    Thanks
    Kultar

    You can find the supported platforms document here :
    http://service.sap.com >> SAP Support Infrastructure >> Business Objects support.
    Next in the left panel >> Documentation >> Supported Platforms >> BusinessObjects XI 3.1 >> ...
    The WebSphere version we officially support is Websphere Application Server 6.1.0.7. We didn't test with WebSphere 7 yet, this is something that will be added in a next release (no commited date yet).

  • C++14 Standard Support for Solaris Studio

    Hi Steve,
    Currently, does Solaris Studio 12.4 Final Release support C++14 constructs? I saw the Standard C++ website https://isocpp.org/std/status and the C++14 Standard will soon release the final draft later this year.
    But, given that C++14 is going to be a minor change as compared to C++11, which they mentioned C++14 mostly completes C++11 (in FAQ: https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/cpp14#cpp14-compilers), will the next release add support of C++14 before the next standard, which is slated for around 2017?
    Although at this stage nothing has been confirmed yet, I wonder if the statement in the Standard C++ FAQ would mean that the new C++14 would still be treated as C++11, which would mean that Solaris Studio compilers would handle C++14 codes as under C++11 standard (i.e. the -std=c11 and -std=c++11 flags can be used to compile C++14 codes), though I am not sure.
    Regards,
    Brian

    Compared to C++11, C++14 has two kinds of changes:
    1. "Bug fixes":  Primarily clarification of issues in C++11 that were incomplete or ambiguous, and loosening of rules that were deemed to be unnecessarily strict. There is at least one rule change, where C++11 required instantiation of unused template functions that had an exception-specification, and C++14 does not.
    2. New features:  New syntax, and new contents in the standard library.
    Like most other compilers, Studio 12.4 in C++11 mode has many of the C++14 bug fixes, including the rule change about template functions that I mentioned above. (For one customer's code, the rule change resulted in a nearly 20x speedup in compile time, from days to hours.)
    Studio 12.4 does not have any of the new C++14 features, and the compiler does not have a C++14 mode. The reason is timing; Studio 14 feature freeze predated approval of the C++14 standard. We prefer not to implement proposed new features until they are published in the standard, because features have a habit of changing between their supposedly final form and actual publication. We have been bitten by such changes in the past, and it creates problems for us, and our customers who depend on compiler stability for large projects.
    We expect to implement C++14 in a future release. Oracle policy does not permit me to be more specific.

  • NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL supported for FC Studio II on DP PPC G5 2.5??

    Up dated to 10.4.11 & Studio II (FC6.0.2) and no problem. Even launched Final cut once and all o.k.
    2nd time, says grafix card, NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL isn't Quartz Extreme so, good by we're
    quitting.
    Swapped into another identical G5 and in Sys Profiler, says the card is Quartz Extreme supported.
    What gives? I tried the Nvidia web site for drivers, but they show no Mac support.
    Ideas?
    thanks
    p2

    Any progress on this? I just ran into the same problem. I launch Final Cut Pro 6.0.3 and I get an error:
    1)Final Cut Pro requires that your system have a Quartz Extreme capable video card.
    2)Final Cut Pro recommends that your system have 64 MB of VRAM; this system has only 0 MB of VRAM.
    3)The installed graphics card does not not support the OpenGL features recommended by Final Cut Pro.
    System profilor shows the GeForce 6600, but no Quarts infomration.
    PowerPC G5 Dual 2.3 - 2GB RAM, 10.4.11

  • MP3 support for WAVE Studio 7

    Good evening. I have the X-Fi extreme audio (PCI-E). Do you know, why Wave Studio 7 is not support MP3 files?
    Thanks?

    I too have had the exact problems ever since I started using windows 7. I have had communications with tech support and all they keep telling me is to uninstall the program, re download it and it should work.
    Well, that's like watching a re-run and expecting a different ending. It's the very same file installer , I've done it 4 times or more and it still does not let you save anything.
    My conclusion is that it does NOT work on Windows 7 and they will not tell you that. I even tried an older version of Wave Studio and got the same results.
    Maybe in the future they will fix it, but for now, they won't admit to it.
    IF you should ever find a "fix" for it, please let me know as I like that program.
    Wayne
    [email protected]

  • JDK/JRE Version support for Oracle Lite

    Hi,
    We have developed an application using jdk 1.4.x which also using Oracle9i Lite 5.0.2 release as a database. Application behaves normal except while closing it throws java exception (Exceptio Guard Page Exception) error.
    Is it because of the JDK Version we are using? What is the JDK/JRE version level supported by Oracle Lite.
    Thanks
    Krishna

    Right
    I got the same problem too.
    When my program and oracle 9i lite is running under JRE1.3.1, everything is ok.
    However, when i migrate the jre to 1.4.x, the program must fail and report DLL exception after closing.
    So trouble~!

  • OBIEE 11.1.1.6.0 support for Websphere?

    Hi
    Is OBIEE 11.1.1.6.0 deployable on Websphere? If yes, can any one guide me with the details of installation and deployment on websphere?
    Thanks in advance.

    I'm not sure but it should support. please refer installation and configuration and deployment guide.

  • Subversion support for Sun Studio 11 IDE

    Hi there,
    has anybody succeeded in using the Sun Studio 11 IDE with the Subversion SCM system? I searched the web for informations about this but didn't find anything.
    Thanks for your help!
    Jens Siebert

    Jens,
    The subversion module in netbeans is based on a current version
    of netbeans (I'm not sure exactly which one). It very unlikely to work
    with the Sun Studio 11 IDE because the Sun Studio 11 IDE is based
    on a much older version of NetBeans (3.5.1 with modifications).
    The next major release of Sun Studio should use the current
    NetBeans release. It should work with the Subversion module.
    Unfortunately, we won't be releasing for quite a while.
    Gordon

  • Websphere Studio Plug-in for DB2 Intelligent miner

    The WebSphere Studio Plug-in for DB2 Intelligent Miner is a plug-in for Websphere Studio development tools (WSSD, WSAD, WSED) that can be used as a graphical front end for DB2 Intelligent Miner Scoring/Modeling.
    DB2 Intelligent Miner Scoring/Modeling is a DB2 extender for data mining. It provides a SQL API that allows you to add data-mining functionalities to your application. But since it doesn't provide any GUI, the programmer has to learn the data-mining SQL API to be able to use it. For complex mining operations on large numbers of tables, the use of the API is not an easy task.
    This plug-in hides the complexity of the API by allowing the programmer to define a data-mining process in a visual and intuitive way. The plug-in automatically generates the SQL code necessary for running it.
    http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/imeclipseplugin?open&S_PKG=&S_TACT=103AMW61&S_CMP=GR&ca=dgr-awjw03imeclipseplugin

    The WebSphere Studio Plug-in for DB2 Intelligent Miner is a plug-in for Websphere Studio development tools (WSSD, WSAD, WSED) that can be used as a graphical front end for DB2 Intelligent Miner Scoring/Modeling.
    DB2 Intelligent Miner Scoring/Modeling is a DB2 extender for data mining. It provides a SQL API that allows you to add data-mining functionalities to your application. But since it doesn't provide any GUI, the programmer has to learn the data-mining SQL API to be able to use it. For complex mining operations on large numbers of tables, the use of the API is not an easy task.
    This plug-in hides the complexity of the API by allowing the programmer to define a data-mining process in a visual and intuitive way. The plug-in automatically generates the SQL code necessary for running it.
    http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/imeclipseplugin?open&S_PKG=&S_TACT=103AMW61&S_CMP=GR&ca=dgr-awjw03imeclipseplugin

  • Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2008

    We are currently using Visual Studio 2005 w/Crystal Report 11.5.  We have been unable to migrate to Visual Studio 2008 up until now because the only version of Crystal Reports that was supported for Visual Studio 2008 was version 10 I believe, and that version did not contain some of the features that we are using in version 11.5. 
    I see that there is now an upgrade available to integrate Crystal Reports 2008 with Visual Studio 2008.  My question is will this version of Crystal Reports give us the same or more features that we are currently getting with Crystal Reports 11.5?

    Hi Clint,
    It is a newer version so you should only gain functionality and not lose any from XI R2.
    Make sure you use Crystal Reports 2008 Service Pack 0 as it is the version that is supported with VS.NET 2008.
    Jason

  • New IBM JDK 1.4.2 for SAP NetWeaver 2004 and 2004s

    In May 2006 IBM System p brand and SAP announced the direction to enhance the IBM AIX 5L JDK 1.4.2 for SAP NetWeaver 2004 and SAP NetWeaver 2004s based applications. The new IBM JDK 1.4.2 for SAP NetWeaver applications on AIX 5L is 100% upward compatible for all SAP business applications and, compared to the classical AIX JDK, provides a more consistent runtime behavior, enhances memory management, and improves debugging capabilities.
    <b>General Availability (GA) of the new IBM JDK 1.4.2 for SAP NetWeaver 2004 and 2004s on AIX 5L</b>
    As part of a staged release process aligned between IBM and SAP a customer pilot program was started in August 2006 followed by a Controlled Availability (CA) program. Based on positive customer feedback resulting from real production usage and the very encouraging internal test results, the new IBM JDK on AIX 5L is/will be generally available
    •     for SAP NetWeaver 2004 SP14 and above starting at 5th of February 2007
                    and
    •     for SAP NetWeaver 2004s SP06 and above starting at 30th of March 2007.
    This means systems running above SAP NetWeaver releases in an AIX 5L environment are allowed to use the new IBM JDK without restrictions.
    This announcement does not affect the use and support of the classical AIX JDK outside SAP environments.
    <b>Transition Plan to the new IBM JDK 1.4.2 on AIX 5L</b>
    SAP will support the classical and the new JDK in parallel for a limited number of NetWeaver support packages. Afterwards only the new IBM JDK will be supported:
    •     for SAP NetWeaver 2004 the first support package only supporting the new JDK will be SP21 (planned date for SP21 see http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700001130682005E),
    •     for SAP NetWeaver 2004s it will be SP14 (planned date for SP14 see http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700004584092005E).
    So please plan a transition to the new JDK prior to the upgrade to these support packages.
    SAP and IBM strongly believe that the switch to the new JDK will improve your experience with JAVA based SAP applications on AIX 5L. Both companies recommend upgrading to the new IBM JDK 1.4.2 for SAP applications running on AIX 5L as soon as it matches your company’s maintenance plans.

    You can download the JDK directly from the sun java website...
    http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/1.4.2_12/index.html
    I don't think Ubuntu is supported...
    Regards
    Juan

  • I am using IMAQ vision for Measurement Studio, Ver6.0 with Measurement Studio Base Package,Ver6.0(Professional Edition).Can I work in IMAQ Vision for Measurement studio, Ver6.0 If I upgrade Measurement studio to Enterprise Edition,ver8.0.1

    I am using IMAQ vision for Measurement Studio, Ver6.0 with Measurement Studio Base Package,Ver6.0(Professional Edition).Can I work in IMAQ Vision for Measurement studio, Ver6.0 If I upgrade Measurement studio to Enterprise Edition,ver8.0.1
    Thanks
    Biswajit

    Howdy Biswajit,
    The IMAQ and Vision ActiveX controls you are using with Visual Basic 6 do not install with Measurement Studio. They are installed when you install the IMAQ software and include support for Visual Studio 6. Upgrading to Measurement Studio 8.0.1 will have no effect on your IMAQ controls since they are not related to one another. Purchasing Measurement Studio Professional or Enterprise packages allows you Visual Studio 6 support for other ActiveX components. Refer to this link for a list of ActiveX components included in those packages. 
    If you are asking about using the ActiveX controls in .NET, then take a look at this KnowledgeBase entitled Do NI-IMAQ and NI Vision Support Microsoft Visual Studio .NET?
    Hope this clarifies things!
    Best Regards,
    Jonathan N.
    National Instruments

  • Future support for C++0x in Sun Studio

    I've recently been having to defend my choice of using the sun studio compiler against several gcc advocates here in the office. The one reasonable issue they keep bringing up is when the upcoming C++0x (more like C++1x or even C++2x at the pace the standards committee is operating at) features will be available in complete fashion in sun studio. They say, and I have to begrudgingly agree, that judging by the amount of time it took studio to support boost (template templates, certain partial template specializations, etc), there could be a long delay between the release of gcc's C++0x support and that of studio's.
    I understand that many of the new features of C++0x, even from initial glance, appear to be quite complicated, especially lambda functors and their associated []/auto return types, variadac template parameters and class concept checking. In addition, I understand gcc has an unfair advantage so to speak since it is being used as the test bed for many of the committee proposal submitter's proof-of-concept implementations (the variadic template parameter feasibility implementation written for gcc comes to mind).
    Could a developer please assuage my fears and inform me that the studio team has a roadmap/timeframe in place to release a studio that fully supports the new language-level features in a reasonably competitive time frame? It apparently will be the responsibility of the STLPort team to essentially copy many of boost's libraries (shared_ptrs, random numbers, type_traits) and rename them and move them to the std namespace and also supply the new unordered<> containers, to name a few.
    I for one can't wait until boost::mpl, boost::fusion, boost::format and others are all reduced from 10's of 1000's of lines of pre-processor generated crufty template definitions to a single variadic template declaration. Also, I won't feel quite so willfully derelict to efficient code every time i bust out an std::for_each and drop in a boost::bind generated functor and instead can use a lambda function with the various efficiency gains ranging from direct referencing to the stack variables passed in as the closure arguments to the ability for the compiler to actually inline the body of the lambda function where appropriate.
    I'm in no way trying to accuse you compiler developers of being slow to implement features, but just would like to be assured that there is nothing to worry about and there is a plan and current work being done on the required features. I know it's still a couple of years off, but I personally can't wait to replace hundreds of lines of boost::bind() calls with their more efficent lambda equivalent, and in addition clean up interfaces that could have used boost::bind if it weren't for the unacceptable overhead introduced often executed blocks of code.
    Thanks,
    Chris Knight - Faithful sun studio user through at least 2 major name changes and since at lest when it was called Forte 4.2 and RougeWave and classicIO libraries roamed the earth in vast quantities.
    P.S. I truly fear that the other 3 major compilers (gnu, intel, ms) will be out the door with C++0x in around the same time and boost will then willingly drop support for the sun compiler if it doesn't support the required language features at that time as they had no problem not supporting studio at all until Studio 12 so I'm sure as soon as the 3 compilers they run nightly tests with support it, they'll be just as eager to
    make use of the new features as I am.
    This leaves someone who has based their entire system on Solaris + SunStudio + Boost in a potentially undesirable situation. Solaris is far too stable and Linux to ever-changing to ever consider Linux as a platform for critical systems yet the idea of running g++ on Solaris w/ gcc's propensity to change their ABI on a weekly basis gives me immediate heartburn.
    Thanks again.

    You raise some very good points, and believe me, we are even more aware of them than you are!
    Short answer: We are planning to bring out a compiler conforming to C++0X in a timely fashion.
    Longer answer:
    Right now, we are working on providing binary compatibility with g++ as an option in the next compiler release. When we are done, you will be able to use g++ headers with Sun C++, and link the code with binaries created by g++. The first implementation will be on Linux. (Which versions of g++ and which versions of Linux? Stay tuned.)
    Implementing all the new features of C++0X will require a re-design of parts of the compiler front end. The current compiler organization does not support "concepts", for example. (We've been looking for an excuse to re-design the front end for a while, and C++0x is not just an excuse -- it's a requirement.) With the g++ ABI work done, we'll ready to start the re-design, and begin to implement C++0x features.
    We won't release an official (stable, fully-supported) product with C++0X features until the standard is final. Until then, any feature could change in unpredictable ways. We got caught by that problem with C++ 4.2 and C++98 -- we implemented what we thought were final features that changed dramatically after we released the compiler. We won't do that again. Compiler stability is one of our most important considerations.
    Beginning some time next year, we expect to have Express releases with some C++0X features. Express releases are our way of providing compilers with experimental features that might not be stable yet. It gives our customers a chance to try them out and provide feedback before they become part of a stable release. That is to say, a feature flagged as experimental is subject to change, and compatibility with other Express or official releases is not guaranteed. We can therefore fix bugs and catch up with late changes in the Standard as necessary.
    We have not yet done all the planning for our C++0X compiler, so I can't give you any estimates about specific feature availability and time frames. When we are farther along, we'll post the road map on a public site, and I'll announce it here.
    Steve Clamage
    Sun C++ Team

Maybe you are looking for