Jerky and "Not In Real Time"

Why is my footage in AF 5.5 jerky and why do I get a message in red saying"Not in Real Time"?
Any ideas please?

You're not giving us any information to work with to help you. We need to know a lot more to help you. Please provide answers to the questions listed here: "FAQ: What information should I provide when asking a question on this forum?"
I'm going to take a guess, and I'm guessing that you are previewing by pressing the space bar. Don't do that. Use RAM preview to get real-time playback of previews.
Start here to learn After Effects: http://adobe.ly/bjBT3P

Similar Messages

ISight not in real time and no fancy 3D Video Chat

I have V3 of iChat and a 2Meg broadband connection, running on an iMac 20" last years model.
1. Why is my iSight not in real time, it looks stacatto.
2. How do you get the fancy 3D video chat screen

As Defcom says there can be problems if you updated from Panther.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=406147
1:27 PM Friday; May 12, 2006

TWO VERY TOUGH SUPPORT PROBLEMS FACED AND SOLVED IN REAL TIME

pls any body post two very tough support problems faced and solved in real time.
my id is: [email protected]

Hi Priya.,
For example client wants his customer legacy number in XD01 master data which is not there in Standard SAP.we can satisfy the requirement with USER EXIT
2) If the client wants customer Phone number in the sales order we can use user exit to satify the requirement
These are not provided in Standard SAP & we should work out on alternative way
REWARD if helpfull
Thanks & Regards
Narayana

LabVIEW 2010 Evaluation Mode not runing Real Time

LabVIEW 2010 Evaluation Mode not runing Real Time
Attachments:
real time.jpg ‏133 KB

Have you tried re-installing the Real-Time module (both on the target and the PC)?
Have you verified it's activated?
Have you tried re-installing the evaluation license files? http://joule.ni.com/nidu/cds/view/p/id/2068/lang/en
In other words, what have you tried?

Magic trackpad jerky and not smooth lots of troubleshooting to no avail.

Uggg... so I swear this started a few days ago when I was trying to do the photo's upload (didn't work) but it might just have been coincidence...
My magic trackpad (bluetooth enabled using with my iMac) is crazy jerky and NOT smooth at any speed.... here is all the info... this is VERY strange.
A regular plugged in mouse works fine.
The trackpad IS jerky on other users.
I have cleaned it and dried it multiple times
Brand new batteries reading at 100%
Have un paired and paired it again.
Have paired the Trackpad with ANOTHER COMPUTER and it works FINE.
I am at a loss.
All software updates are up to date. I have turned bluetooth off and on.
Ugg... I literally can't think of anything else to do... I obviously am using this CONSTANTLY so any ideas would be much appreciated!
Josh

Hey yendoggy,
Resetting your Mac's SMC and NVRAM may help stabilize input from your trackpad.
Resetting the System Management Controller (SMC) on your Mac
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201295
How to Reset NVRAM on your Mac
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204063
Cheers,
Allen

Is it possible to set up my iPad as a video camera and broadcast it real time to a TV via apple TV?

Is it possible to sey up my iPad as a video camera and broadcast it real time to a TV via Apple TV?

Use airplay to send what is on the iPad to your tv.
Since ipad2, you can display exactly what is on the ipad screento a tv via an adaper or via airplay through an apple TV.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5209
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4437
General overview but lacks specifics.
http://accelerateyourmarketing.com/home-video-studio/
Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce5FVJi0Uxw

Webview not showing real time reports

Hi,
I have a customer with IPCC Enterprise 7.5 and using the Webview for reporting. The Real Time reports are empty although campaigns are running and agents are logged in. The Historical Reports works absolutely fine. I noticed that for the dialer port status report, I had to enable a setting through the registry, according to the following document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1001/products_tech_note09186a00801dc6cf.shtml
I changed that and then the Real Time report for the dialer port status works. Nothing else from the Real Time reports returns any data.
Thank you,
Agelos

We are using only the Outbound option, so it's only for the outbound. It doesn't give me any Real Time report except the dialer port status. It doesn't return any error, but the report is empty.

Denmark! How dó i change my Ipad2, so the app, iTunes, Open in Danish and not english every time i turn it ón ?

Denmark! How dó i change my Ipad2, so the app, iTunes, Open in Danish and not english every time i turn it ón ?

The language of the store is set by the store that you are using. Are you logged in with your Danish iTunes account on the iPad : Settings > Store ?

How to calculate rms voltage, rms current and frequency from real time data?

Hello,
I need to calculate the real time rms voltage, rms current and frequency of the received voltage and current graphs using visa read. Actually am trying to monitor the voltage and current parameters of AC load, in this case, am using a set of 4 light bulbs at the moment. Expected frequency is 50 Hz, and rms voltage close to 240v AC, current about 1A.
Attached is the vi picture of what I have been able to achieve so far, courtesy of labview forums. But I need to finally finish this vi by calculating the Vrms, Irms and frequecy. The front panel shows the voltage (Chart V) and current (Chart I) after scaling. Chart VI represents ADC value 0 ~ 1023 of received data. Aray V & I show the binary bits received up to 10 bits of useful data from ADC. Each sine wave from ADC is sampled at 25 samples for the ADC conversion, and sampling frequency of 1.28kH.
I have tried using the RMS vi, but seems I don't know how to configure it correctly to get desired results. Also when I make changes like switching of one of the bulbs so that their is current change, I need to refresh the SERIAL port first before changes show up on the VI. Any ideas on how to improve on this are highly appreciated.
Otherwise, I would appreciate if somebody helps me MODIFY my VI to read the rms values and frequency from received data. This is the last piece of my project, I do appreciate all the help rendered. Am currently using labview labview 2014, student version!
Gavin.
Attachments:
Test_revised1.vi ‏39 KB
Test_frontpanel.png ‏196 KB
Test_blockdiagram.png ‏187 KB

hello,
note that peak voltage (Vpeak) is (240 * 1.414) = 399 V and peak current about 1.414 if intended rms current is 1A.
Gavin.

Continuous data acquisition and analysis in real time

Hi all,
This is a VI for the continous acquisition of an ECG signal. As far as I understand the DAQmx Analog read VI needs to be placed inside a while loop so it can acquire the data continously, I need to perform filtering and analysis of the waveform in real time. The way I set up the block diagram means that the data stays int the while loop, and as far as I know the data will be transfered out through the data tunnels once the loop finishes executing, clearly this is not real time data processing.
The only way I can think of fixing this problem is by placing another while loop that covers the filtering the stage VIs and using some sort of shift registeing to pass the data to the second loop. My questions is whether or not this would introduce some sort of delay, and wether or not this would be considered to be real time processing. Would it be better to place all the VIs (aquicition and filtering) inside one while loop? or is this bad programming practice. Other functions that I need to perform is to save the data i na file but only when the user wants to do so.
Any advice would be appriciated.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

You have two options:
A. As you mentioned, you can place code inside your current while loop to do the processing. If you are clever, you won't need to place another while loop inside your existing one (nested loops). But that totally depends on the type of processing you are doing.
B. Create a second parallel loop to do the processing. This would decouple the processes to ensure that the processing does not hinder your acquisition. See here for more info.
Your choice really depends on the processing that you plan to perform. If it is processor-intensive, it might introduce delays as you mentioned.
I would reccomend you first try to place everything in the first loop, and see if your DAQ buffer overflows (you can monitor the buffer backlog while its running). If so, then you should decouple the processes into separate loops.
Regarding whether or not "this would be considered to be real time processing" is a loaded question. Most people on these forums will say that your system will NEVER be real-time because you are using a desktop PC to perform the processing (note: I am assuming this is code running on a laptop or desktop?). It is not a deterministic system and your data is already "old" by the time it exits your DAQ buffer. But the answer to your question really depends on how you define "real-time processing". Many lay-people will define it as the processing of "live data" ... but what is "live data"?

Can I edit multiclips, but NOT in real time?

I love multiclip editing, but right now I've got 5 angles that were shot without a director calling the shots, so any given edit can require some real decision-making. I often must choose between the lesser of 5 evils, so-to-speak, and I can't really do that in real time.
Is the multiclip function "pause-able?" Can I edit on the fly for a few cuts, pause the process to scrub around for a minute and make a edit decision, and then continue in real time?
Thanks for any insights!

Yes.
If you simply need cutaway shots...
I'll usually set up my multiclip on V1, the activate the V2 track for 'cut-ins'.
I can easily place the playhead over an 'active angle' of the camera I want to utilize, then hit the 'f' key. This will 'find' that point on the original clip, from which I can quickly scrub back and forth to find what I want and drop it on V2.
I've set up a 'quick-key' for the Gang/Open on my '/' key, so I can just hit that after dropping the shot on V2, which gets me back to multiclip functionality.
Once the edit is locked, collapse V1, then select all shots on V2 and shift-drag them down to V1.
Not sure that's what you're looking for exactly, but it works for me. BTW, I make it a habit to only cut a few shots, then stopping, then carrying on. This way you don't lose shots that you like when the 'cuts' are set.
K

Windows 7 offline files do not sync real time while online?

I have network folders setup for use offline. When im online and another user deletes files from those folders, i dont see those deletions until i reboot or force a manual sync. How do you make that to show real time. So that when another user deletes files
in folders i have set to use offline... however im online connected/authenticated to the network, i can see those changes real time.
thanks,

Wow, nearly two years since this question was posted and still no worthwhile contribution from Microsoft.
We are also seeing behavior similar to this. We're running Windows 7 clients on a SBS 2011 network. We are not doing folder redirection, but rather we have users taking certain file shares offline to work from home or on the road (works much
better/faster than the VPN). However, when they get back to the office occasionally they find themselves editing the same file another user is, or referring another user to check out a file they created while offline which is not actually in the share.
Turns out their PC is using the local cache and not the network cache for some file access, but it insists that the user is working online. Typically if the user forces a manual sync and resolves any conflicts or errors that arise, they can be 99 percent
sure they are working online for real, but without double-checking against open files on the server there's really no way to know for sure. This has absolutely destroyed user confidence in this technology which used to work OK (where this is concerned
anyway - it still had some flaws) in Windows XP.
I saw a post in the partner forum where a moderator basically said "oh yeah, I can totally reproduce that in my lab and that's a shame...try Sharepoint." Absurd.
Seems like Microsoft is basically taking the stance that Offline Files is only worth using for folder redirection where only one user is likely to be using the files. If that's the case then as long as the data syncs eventually it's probably not
a huge deal that this happens. If, however, you're using Offline Files to sync a shared directory this can have disastrous consequences with documents being edited simultaneously for hours or even days before finally someone realizes the problem and
then one user or the other gets to redo their changes.
If they can't make them work right, then they could at least give us more transparencey so the user can see what's going on. I hated the stupid "you are now working offline" popups in Windows XP as much as the next guy, but I'd kill to get them
back now, if only to avoid this stuff. When a user browses to their share that's been made "always available offline" and it says "Offline status: Online" then it should be using files from the LAN, not the cache.

Final cut and hardwear acceleration (real time Rendering )

hi all
used final cut pro in vedio editting i search for any solution for accelerat my rendering time ...am tierd coz its take alot time ....i search about hardwear pci card like aja and matrox but i dont sure it work..............
i search also about tuning of the mac os itself but i dont find any things.........
plz help me if any one know ...............

There are no third party hardware solutions to speeding up render times. Not Matrox, or AJA. A better graphics card will make certain effects real time or render faster (the FXPlug ones only). But really, the only thing that speeds up render times are processors. So the only way to speed up render times would be to get a faster machine.
Shane

Why is sharing HDV iMovie Project back to camera not in real time?

The posting from Michel Raymond on Dec 22th, 2009 asked the question of why is the transfer of iMovie HD Project to camera so long. In his case a 50 minute iMovie Project would have taken 1300 minutes to transfer had he proceeded.
In my posting of Dec 18th I pointed that my 57 minutes 48 GB HDV Project would have taken 43 hours to archive back to camera on mini DV tape.
Bengt Warleby, in his reply on Dec 23rd to Michel Raymond's posting, said that " to copy back to camera (mini DV tape) should take same as movie duration".
So I carried out a simple check of this possibility by downloading 6 minutes of HDV original footage to make a new 6 minute 4.2 GB iMovie Project. No editing was carried. ie no voice-overs, no transitions, nothing extra at all to modify the original footage. I then shared this Project back to the same video camera from which the original footage had been downloaded.
The first stage , "Mixing Audio" was very quick, less than 1 minute.
The 2nd stage of "Encoding" TOOK 23 MINUTES!
The final stage of "Writing to tape" took 6 minutes.
SO, IT TOOK A TOTAL OF 30 MINUTES TO TRANSFER BACK A 6 MINUTE iMOVIE PROJECT TO CAMERA.
WHY? Why was further encoding required when no changes or additions had been made to the original footage? Why was it not transferred back in the same real time as it was downloaded?
HELP.! I really need to have some answers.

MauiJim wrote:
.. Is it possible to open the '09 project with '06 to utilize the share to camera feature in '06?
in iM09, choose Export using QT, and for SD choose dv-stream, HD choose QT/AppleIntermediate.. these are the only two codecs in use in iMHD6.. don't be surprised: ~13/40GBs/h ..
Is Apple considering an update to add the share to camera feature to '09 or possibly in a future version? It's a valuable tool for archiving to tape rather than DVD/HD.
speculation, esp. on future  products is not allowed as topic on this board..
.. imho, this feature was axed&buried finally with iMHD6..

Can I acquire and analyse in real time with regular Labview?

I have to acquire samples (which vary cyclically in a roughly sinusoidal fashion) from a sensor, and check every sample to see if it is the minimum (the valley) of a cycle. If it is, and it does not fall within an expected range, I have to take a corrective action that involves rejecting the part that was just measured as well as a 30 more parts (to make sure that the defective part has been rejected). The signal from the sensor is not very noisy, but beause of the nature of the measured object, there could be local minima and maxima. To guard against that, a point is considered to be a valley only if subsequent readings deviate above that point by a certain amount. If a part is indeed defective,
a digital out put has to issued to reject that part.
Can all these be done using regular Labview (not RT)? I tried it out with a proto-type VI, using DAQmx vis, continously acquiring samples, but reading one sample at a time from within a loop (the VI I used is attached with this question). The result has been disappointing, since each time the loop executes there is a delay that keeps building up. Finally, even after the part feed has been turned off I can see Labview processing signals from parts that have long since gone past the measuring head.
Another perplexing thing I found is that the time taken to execute the while loop in the vi is not consistent; it takes anything from 6 to 50ms to execute.
I will need atleast 8-12 samples from a part to build its profile, and the feed rate is about 3000 parts per minute. I am using Labview 7.0 with an NI-6013 card in a Windows 2000 environment.
Thanks for any suggestions / recommendations.
Attachments:
find_trough_2.vi ‏378 KB

Hello,
Thank you for your suggestions; I had already resigned myself to going for a Real Time system, your answer convinced me to commit myself to it!
That said, your reply leads to a couple of (related) questions...
1. Your point regarding the use of Local Variables is well taken; I have been repeatedly told at various training sessions how the necessity of updating the LVs during each loop iteration slows the computation time. However, what alternative do we have when there are several controls to which we have to write AND read data multiple times during a loop iteration, and perform different computations based on the value held by these controls? (You have seen the VI I attached with the original question). Some of these conditional
computations further change the value of the controls. Does Labview have any other mechanism to store and manipulate the intermediate value from a computation?
2. I did a simple experiment to determine the average loop time, and the results were surprising. I placed the entire content of the VI I used (Find the Valley in cycle.vi) in a stacked sequence structure, and wired the index counter "i" to a control to count the number of iterations the loop executes. I placed a frame before this with a tick count instruction to get the start time of the loop, and a frame after this to get the end time of the loop. Dividng the difference of these with the number of iterations, I got the average loop time to be around 1.2ms! Am I interpreting my results incorrectly?
Thnaks once again for your response. I would really appreciate your views on the questions I have raised in this comment
Regards
Arun P. Madangarli

Jerky and "Not In Real Time"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for