Jmenuitem overlap with jchoice on a panel

my jmenuitem ovelap with jchoice panel and look like the jmenuitem is at the back of the jchoice on a panel . is this a bug? how to overcome this?

i think is because my jmenuitem and panel is swing component and my jchoice is awt component? can this be the reason? how to overcome this?

Similar Messages

  • Error FZ-358 - Overlap with payment run

    Hello.
    We have a client SAP 40B that experienced an issue while running a new payment run throught T-code F110.
    The payment was:
    Run Date: 12.30.2008
    Identification: F0719
    The user got the following message:
    "FZ 358 - Overlap with payment run 02.03.2008 / Identification F0719"
    "Payment run canceled"
    Anybody have an idea why this happened as the payments ran in different dates?
    Thank you!

    Hello MSJ.
    This issue happens probably because there was another payment ID with the same name that ran incompletely in the past. Somehow the system identifies this payment ID and then try to use the same one when you run another payment with the same ID so this message comes up. The solution is really delete the old uncompleted payment run and then run the payment again.
    Regards,
    Volnei Luiz

  • Images overlap with text when after creating pdf: InDesign CS

    Good morning,
    I am using bot InDesign CS and CS2, and I am having a problem as the following:
    After creating the pdf, images overlap with one another, or the text overlap behind the images so on.
    First, I would like to mention the overlapped images had no problem at the previous version of the pdf. If I make a change on the page "06" for example and then recreate the pdf, a couple of images in the other pages move to the different place through the document.
    So I tend to "replace" the changed pages into the previous version of the pdf instead of recreating the pdf for all pages.
    Is this kind of bug or features of InDesign?
    It would be very much appreciated if anyone answer me.
    Warm regard, Andrew.

    The PDF that was placed into ID loses all interactivity and form fields. There is no way to do what you want.
    Bob

  • What's the deal with the CC menubar panel?

    What's the deal with the CC menubar panel? The tab to the apps are gone -- looks like it wants me to update the panel itself rather than list my installed apps. I've been on CC for about a month, is this common? Thankfully I can still open all apps normally, but the internet seems to think the "CC Way" is a horror show.
    Do you guys have trouble after updating the updater? All this talk of running "the cleaner" (a mafia term?) and reinstalling everything with each version bump is kinda scary. It could be that people only post online when things go wrong, and 95% of people update just fine. But since I'm new I guess I'd want some reassurance before committing to a night of Cleaning and Reinstalling...
    I'm one of those people who think app updates very 12 to 18 months was just fine (and stable). Would it be harmful to ignore updates for a few months? Lets see, I have a healing brush, smart objects, a blob tool, pretty good 3D in AE, ID seems to handle type pretty well… there's really no reason to update every month is there?
    -- Jim

    Has anyone had a normal non-cleaning install of this week's update?

  • Overlap with payment run 25.02.2008

    Hello friends,
      While running APP at F110, i got the error as "overlap with payment run 25.02.2008 HMY1(Co. code)" The description is given below:
    Diagnosis
    Accounts to be processed in this run have already been processed in payment run or proposal run 25.02.2008 HMY1.
    System Response
    The run is terminated to avoid double payments.
    Procedure
    Either narrow down the accounts to be processed or wait until the payments for the 25.02.2008 HMY1 have been carried out.
    I have deleted the payment proposal and parameters entered and again run the programme. Again i am getting the same error. Could anyone let me know how to solve this error.
    Regards
    Sabera

    Hi Sabera,
    Please check the following in your system :
    1. If there is a blocked entry in the table T042X. If yes, this should be the reason why you get error FZ358 when runing any proposal in your Company Code. In such case, you may have to delete the entry in tha table T042X.
    2. If in table REGUV, there is a value 'S' in field XECHT for this payment run, which is incorrect. The value here should be a space.
    It is dificult to know the exact reason for this error. I guess this would have caused by some improper actions for F110 proposal deletion. In order to get this corrected you should carry out a correction in
    tables T042X and set REGUV in your system. I would suggest you to do that first in your test system.
    Hope this information helps you.
    Thank you.
    Suresh Jayanthi.

  • Record for spouse overlaps with record for domestic partner

    Hi Experts
    When we are creating Spouse record we are getting following error in portal.
    "Record for spouse overlaps with record for domestic partner"
    I have deleted the Plans for Domestic Partner and I have deleted the Domestic Partner from Portal and after that I am trying to create the spouse. I could able to create spouse in BACK END system (HCM) after I deleted  the Domestic Partner from portal. But I can't able to create Domestic Partner from the Portal.
    If I delete DP instead of Delimit from the backend I could able to create the Spouse from portal. But If I Delimit I can't create the record from Portal.
    Could you please suggest us.
    Thanks
    Sowmya

    You cant overlap these records you need to use differnt subtype

  • Overlap with payment run in SAPF110S

    Scheduled F110S in background job, but the job is throwing the following error :
    "Log for payment run for payment on 29.07.2008, identification ABC
    Overlap with payment run 27.06.2008 64GT1
    ... the execution of the payment program is terminated"
    Please advise/suggest what could have gone wrong  and if possible please suggest the solution?

    Hi,
    There is already a payment run was half way through... with the same selection parameters... 
    Use T Code F110,
    run date 27.06.2008
    ID -64GT1
    Now delete the proposal...
    Try now F110S...
    Hope it helps
    Regards
    A.Saravanan.

  • The port range is overlapped with rule X message - SRP521W

    Hello,
    I am having trouble adding a NAT port forwarding rule on my SRP521W. I get the error
    The port range is overlapped with rule X, even though my port ranges are not overlapping.
    I have this rule created (rule 2):
    and am trying to create this rule:
    I get this error
    It seems to be related to the fact that both internal ports are 80, but this should not matter as the internal IP addresses are different. Can someone please explain how I should create rules to allow me to open ports to two different devices, with different IPs, using port 80?
    Many thanks

    Oh wow!  That is an extremely old release.
    I would certainly recommend upgrading straight away.
    Latest release is 1.1.27 and is available via www.cisco.com/go/srp500 - follow the download software link on the right hand side.
    When selecting code, follow the link for SRP520 Models (not SRP520-U)
    You should find that the latest code fixes your issue (and provides more functionality).
    Regards,
    Andy

  • Logo Overlaps with Data when viewed in HTML mode

    Hi,
    My report looks weird when I view the report in HTML mode i.e., my report logo overlaps with the report Row headers but when i view the same report in Java Applet mode report looks good and also when I export the report it looks good.
    I tried deleting the logo & adding a new logo & I even changed the settings of the logo & also I cleared cache of my browser, etc. I tired many options but nothing seems to work. Only couple of reports have this kind of issue & rest other reports looks good.
    Did anyone faced this kind of issue before? Is it a tool bug?
    FYI, I am using BO 4.0 SP5.
    FYI, I have created Logo by creating a blank cell in the Header of the report., then right click on blank cell and select “Format Cell”. In the formal Format Cell window click on Appearance and click on Radio Button “Image from URL” then type boimg://reportimage.jpg
    Thanks & Regards.
    Naveen.

    See if one of these program will kick it out of recovery mode:
    For PC
    RecBoot: Easy Way to Put iPhone into Recovery Mode
    If necessary:
    Download QTMLClient.dll & iTunesMobileDevice.dll for RecBoot
    and                                           
    RecBoot tip
    For MAC or PC       
    The Firmware Umbrella - TinyUmbrella
    Next, restore the the iPod and see if you can get any data off the restored iPod
    via How to perform iPad recovery for photos, videos
      Wondershare Dr.Fone for iOS: iPhone Data Recovery - Wondershare Official

  • Metainit error - overlaps with device in metadevice state database

    I have successfully mirrored 3 of 4 partitions on a new install but am having trouble with the last one. It is the swap partition. There are the usual steps I follow:
    SWAP (slice 1):
    1. metainit -f d11 1 1 c0t0d0s1
    2. metainit d12 1 1 c0t8d0s1
    3. metainit d10 -m d11
    4. edit the /etc/vfstab
    5. reboot
    6. metattach d10 d12
    After step #1, I get the following error:
    metainit: tpssol2: c0t0d0s1: overlaps with device in metadevice state database
    I check metastat and all the config files and don't see anything wrong.

    What platform is this? SPARC or X86 and OS version. This normally happens after a rebuild and you get 2 disk devices with the same ID.
    #iostat -Ei
    This will display your disks and IDs. If the match, you will need to do the following (this should applies for physical and virtual servers, but I have only tested it on VMware) in this example c1t0d0 and c1t1d0(secondary) are the disks with matching IDs.
    #iostat -Ei
    this shows 2 disks with the same ID
    #cfgadm -al|grep c1t
    c1::dsk/c1t0d0 disk connected configured unknown
    c1::dsk/c1t1d0 disk connected configured unknown
    #cfgadm -c unconfigure c1::dsk/c1t1d0
    #cfgadm -al|grep c1t
    c1::dsk/c1t0d0 disk connected configured unknown
    c1::dsk/c1t1d0 disk connected unconfigured unknown
    #iostat -Ei
    this shows now only one disk
    from within VMWare manager remove the secondary disk and add it back again!
    #cfgadm -c configure c1::dsk/c1t1d0
    #cfgadm -al|grep c1t
    c1::dsk/c1t0d0 disk connected configured unknown
    c1::dsk/c1t1d0 disk connected configured unknown
    #iostat -Ei
    this now showed a new disk with a unique disk ID.
    #fdisk /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0p0
    Y to the prompt to create Solaris 100% prompt
    #prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s2|fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0s2
    #metadb -af -c4 c1t0d0s7 c1t1d0s7
    Success! You can now setup your mirroring.
    Edited by: readlee on Sep 17, 2008 7:06 AM

  • slice overlaps with device in metadevice state database

    bash-3.00# metadb
    bash-3.00# newfs /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s7
    newfs: construct a new file system /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s7: (y/n)? y
    Warning: 784 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated
    /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s7: 103664 sectors in 17 cylinders of 48 tracks, 128 sectors
    50.6MB in 2 cyl groups (13 c/g, 39.00MB/g, 18624 i/g)
    super-block backups (for fsck -F ufs -o b=#) at:
    32, 80032,
    bash-3.00# metadb -ac3 /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s7
    bash-3.00# metadb
    flags first blk block count
    a u 16 8192 /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s7
    a u 8208 8192 /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s7
    a u 16400 8192 /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s7
    bash-3.00# metainit d20 1 1 /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s0
    metainit: unknown: c0t1d0s0: overlaps with device in metadevice state database
    bash-3.00# metainit -f d20 1 1 /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s0
    metainit: unknown: c0t1d0s0: overlaps with device in metadevice state database
    bash-3.00#
    I get the same result using raw devices.
    The root device is on slice 6 ; this slice being an LU Boot Environment.
    I'm stuck now.Any ideas?
    I'll eliminate the non allocated sectors and try again.
    Edited by: plasmichive on Nov 11, 2009 3:11 AM

    Sorry folks. I had failed to check the placing of slice 7... which I had assumed would be placed in the highest cylinder numbers... however, I used a "custom install" facility, which had placed them somewhere else... I failed to notice when I repartitioned the disk.
    The filesystem which I "newfs"ed a little chunk out of was blank anyway.
    Off to try to bite a chunk out of an operational filesystem now.... idle hands...
    Edited by: plasmichive on Nov 11, 2009 3:35 AM

  • 'global address overlaps with mask'

    static (inside,outside) <global ip> <local ip> netmask <local ip netmask>
    When I enter the above in my pix 501 (mind that whats in the <> is an ip address) I get an error message that says 'global address overlaps with mask'
    Any ideas?

    You're translating your whole inside network. Basically the 'netmask' relates to the global IP AND the local IP. For example, to translate 32 outside addresses to 32 inside addresses, use netmask 255.255.255.224.
    If you're translating one outside address:
    static (inside,outside) netmask 255.255.255.255
    You can also leave off the whole netmask 255.255.255.255 text if it's one host, the PIX will fill that in automatically.

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 11067: Drag and Drop - tweak the positioning of the drop indicator, allow 1 pixel overlap with the container border

    Revision: 11067
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-10-21 16:32:39 -0700 (Wed, 21 Oct 2009)
    Log Message:
    Drag and Drop - tweak the positioning of the drop indicator, allow 1 pixel overlap with the container border
    QE notes: None
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: None
    Reviewer: None
    Tests run: checkintests
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/HorizontalLayout.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/TileLayout.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/VerticalLayout.as

    Revision: 11067
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-10-21 16:32:39 -0700 (Wed, 21 Oct 2009)
    Log Message:
    Drag and Drop - tweak the positioning of the drop indicator, allow 1 pixel overlap with the container border
    QE notes: None
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: None
    Reviewer: None
    Tests run: checkintests
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/HorizontalLayout.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/TileLayout.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/VerticalLayout.as

  • XML second page output overlap with predefind Header

    Hii
    XML Report second page output in overlap with Predefined Header (Paper Header) . so in second page how can i put down the row from Predefined Header.
    Thanks

    Hi 563093
    Hit same issue and, thanks to KlausFabian, fixed by following this one shot step.
    - Edit the template .rtf with notepad search and replace "headerr" with "header".
    Should works great.
    Source:
    Re: anything in header/footer section not coming in the output.
    L.

  • Invoice number on invoice overlapping with other texts

    Dear Friends,
    Invoice number on invoice overlapping with other texts
    On the top right corner of the second page of the invoice, Invoice number is overlapping with the text 'Invoice/Invoice Number'. The text 'Tax Invoice/Invoice Number' should be above the invoice number.
    Where I need to chagne this and how.
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Hi,
    This can be done in the SMARTFORM/SAPSCRIPT
    Check the OUTPUT for the SMARTFORM or SAPSCRIPT in NACE transaction code
    goto the Tranaction code SMARTFORMS and Identify the WINDOW of INVOICE NUMBER and if you have access you can increase the window size or check with your developer to increase the size.
    regards,
    santosh

Maybe you are looking for