JMIP Condition type is not Replicated from Po to MIGO excise tab

Dear Experts
I Maintained inventorized excise condition types in the Purchase order . Like JMIP, JEC2, JSEI .
while doing the GR , Excise values are not coming in the excise Tab.
Please help me.
Thanks
Reddy
Edited by: Subbas on Aug 4, 2010 2:56 PM

hi
chekc following
path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>india >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
here give appripriate conditions for ur procedure as per BED cess and other
regards
kunal

Similar Messages

Condition Type is not copying from contract to sales order

Dear All,
The value the i am giving in the sales contract is not copying into sales order. Sytem again asking to enter the value.Is there any setting to be done forthat.
Regards,
Suresh Yadav.

Hi,
If the *CONDITION VALUES* are *manually* entered then the values will not be copied from the *SOURCE TO TARGET* document
Please check in the Contract whether the vales derived from Condition records are entered manually.
If you want the prices to be copied automatically then they have to maintained through CONDITION RECORDS in *VK11*.
Please maintain the CONDITION RECORDS and check whether they have copied or not
Please also cehck the COPY CONTROLS from CONTRACT to SALES ORDER in VTAA transaction -- at item--->pricing type. and set it a s D
Please check the above settings and let forum know the feedback.
regards,
santosh

Expense condition type does not transfer to CO-PA

Dear guru,
My client would like to post expense (ex. promotion expense) via sales order, then SD consultant create condition type and assign expense G/L to this condition type and I assign this condition type to value field via tcode KE4I. When we create sales order and use this condition type, value of this condition type is not transfered to the value field. I set cost element with category '1'. I know standard is not support for this situation. Please kindly to suggest me for solve the problem 'How do expense value of condition type from sales order will be transfered to CO-PA', example user exit or others.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Nattakarn.

Hi
Changing the cost element category to 12 can be done only at the begining of the fiscal year as follows
But if promotional expenses is already created as a cost element with say category 1, now if you want too change it you might get an error KS134 Field change CElem Category is not possible (transaction data already exists)
Hence use TCode KA02, Edit->Analysis Period, Click other analysis period provide from begining of fiscal year to 12/31/9999.
You might have to create a new GL Account cost element if you want to go ahead with the changes in middle of the fiscal year
Regards,
Suraj

Condition type is not get in the PO output

Hi,
I have defined a new condition type ZRA0- Discount as discount charges .
The condition type is not getting print out in PO copy.
The vendor wants to see in the PO copy.
Pls suggest how to configure
Regards
Sp

Hi,
If i understood your problem, you would like to print the discount in PO print copy along with price.ok.
then check with your Abaper,he can fetch the Discount value for that perticular condition type(ZRA0) & print in the PO copy.Its depends on the print programme to get the data from the document to the print out.
Regds

ZPRS- Cost(data source H) condition type is not visible in CRM sales order

Hi Colleagues,
I created a sales order in ERP. In the sales order the condition type ZPRS- Cost(data source H) is available. I downloaded the this sales order to CRM i can able to see the ZPRS condition type in sales order.
But when i create a new sales order with the same data (BP, Material,Sales organization) the condition ZPRS is not visible in the sales order. When i checked the PRC_TRACE it is showing the error as "Condition with external datasource has not be found".
Can any body help me in this issue.
Tanks and Best Regards,
Rajeswari

Hi Michael ,
Thank you very much for your answer. I just require one more confirmation from you.
Could you please confirm If we post a returns document in CRM system directly the "ZPRS or VPRS - Cost" Condition type will not appear in the return document condition types.
Untill and unless it is a billing document in CRM system the "cost" condtion wont appear rt?
Could you please confirm it.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
Rajeswari

Additional VAT condition type is not flowing to PO

Dear All,
            An additional tax of 1 % is levied in State of gujurat and for this we can take the credit . It behaves exactly like VAT like it calculates its value as 1% of base amount and excise duty levied on it . But this condition is not available in standard TAXINN procedure . So we created a new procedure copying from TAXINN .We created a condition type copying from standard condition type JVRD that is for VAT on which we take credit .Then we assign this condition type to tax procedure immediately below condition type JVRD and it should calculate the value in the same way as that of VAT .Then we assigned this procedure to India , assigned all the condition types in CIN config and maintained default condition types for this procedure copying from TAXINN .
            But while we are creating a PO after that ,this additional tax condition type is not flowing in it .
Can anybody let me know where is the missing link in this customisation .
Regards
Abhijit Das

Hi AP ,
         The condition type is Valid from : Todays Date and valid to 31.12.9999 . Is there any problem with this ?
Abhijit

Business partner(employee) is not replicated from ECC to CRM

The Business partner Not replicated in CRM.Two Sales organization have been maintained for the employee for the different time lines in ECC.Checked the BDOCs and the validation error occur in FM CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL .The BDOCs message was saying the BPGUID was missing .Could anyone please suggest what could be the root cause of the data not replicated from ECC to CRM.

Hi Pragnya,
This is the case where at the time of creation of BP there was some issue with replication.
The BP itself is not there in CRM or only the changes are not reflected?
In such scenarios, perform following steps for successful replication:
1. Go to TCode: CRMM_BUPA_MAP
2. Enter the BP no. {initially it says it does not exist}
3. Enter ERP customer no. and press enter, the BP GUID gets filled
4. Click on "Gather Information about customer" [you can see the status of the object]
5. Now again enter the BP no. -> The customer is available in CRM now.
Regards,
Swagi

Configuration is not replicated from CRM to ECC for configurable product

Hi,
We have some materials in the system for which the configuration is not replicated from CRM to ECC.
We create a quotation in CRM and configure it. In CRM, the configuration is complete and components are properly exploded but when we check the same quotation in ECC, configuration is incomplete with respect to some characteristics and product references.
Please find below finding
1. If the same material is created in another plant/company code, the configuration is replicated properly.
2. We have also checked that the BOM is completely maintained for plants for which configuration is replicated. But we dont think so it could be an issue since if we create the quotation in ECC instead of creating in CRM, for the plant (for which the configuration is not replicated from CRM to ECC), it is properly exploded and complete.
3. variant prices are replicated properly even though components are not replicated.
We need to know if we can explode the BOM in the configuration even though complete BOM for the particular plant is not maintained. If its not possible to explode, why it is possible for us to explode the BOM in the configuration in quotation.
Please advise.
Thx.

the configuration (variant configuration and not customization) that is done in CRM contract is not copied to ECC contract. Is it because that item category in CRM is activated for doing the BOM configuration and the same in ECC is not activated for doing the BOM configuration?
My question is that if item category in ECC is not activated for BOM configuration then is it like that the BOM configuration in CRM will not be copied to ECC?

Condition type is not reflecting in sales orders

hi,
i have created two condition type like jser (service tax) and other one is jste(service tax +cess) but in pricing procedure jfact it is reflecting but while making contract order these two condition type is not accessing.
please help in this connection.

Hi,
After Creating the CONDITION TYPES you need to assign the condition types in the PRICING PROCEDURE
goto the
SPRO->FINANCIALACCOUNTING>FINANCIAL ACCONTING& GLOBAL SETTINGS>TAX ON SALES /PURCHASE>BASIC SETTINGS--->CHECK CALCULATION PROCEDURE.
Here select you procedure and assign the CONDITION TYPE
regards,
santosh

Condition type for pricing came from PC but has not included the additive cost record

hello all;
we have the pricing base for the sales order with the estimated cost from pc; our costing process has a posting record for additive cost is not included on the total cost is sent to the condition type EK02.
question: It is possible to include these kind of postings?, in fact, these record apear on the costing report as part of the cost of sales..
thanks in advanced...

Hi Francisco
Two things,
1. Your condition type must be EK01 if you wanna use it in
Pricing
2. Additive cost in CK74 is at the level of material and plant. It is not at the level of sales order
If you wish to add costs manually in sales order cost estimate, then use Unit Costing as the costing method in your requirement class
Or use Product costing as costing method and use a costing sheet
Br. Ajay M

Condition Type NAVS not determined for Goods PO

Hi all,
I am working on SRM 5.0 and R/3 4.6C.The problem im facing is for the tax condition determination for PO for Goods type which replicated from SRM to PO .
In case of Service PO,the conditions are determined correctly and can be seen in the PO print out.However In case of a goods PO,if i goto conditions tab in ME23N for the PO,the conditions (NAVs) are not determined as well as they cant be seen in PO print .
The config on R/3 side is Correct as in case of manual PO(PO created directly in R/3),the conditions are determined correctly.
Now when i debuuged the BAPi "BAPi_PO_CREATe1",i observed the following:
If i chnage the field PO_PRICE in the table POITEM to "1",then conditions are determined corretcly for the PO.However by dfault,the value for this field comes to "2".
This field is nothing but indicator of the price i.e. 1 for Gross and 2 for Net.
Can anybody explain me the link between this price and condition types determined in PO.
Thanks.

Check out SAP Note 580225 - Purchasing BAPIs: Conditions and pricing
Hope it helps

Condition Type VPRS not appearing on some billing items

Hi,
I have a discrepancy between COPA and postings on the FI account. In COPA in transaction ke4i I have assigned the SD condition type VPRS - Internal price to the COPA value field VRPRS u2013 Stock Value.
The problem arises when the outbound delivery is split on several batches. In this case the condition type VPRS does not appear on the invoice for the split billing item and the amount 0 is loaded into to the COPA filed VRPRS for this billing item instead of value that should appear in the VPRS field. And this causes discrepancies between COPA and FI.
Do you know how to solve this problem? Is it possible to make the condition type VPRS always appear on the invoice, also in case when the delivery is sent in many batches?
Best regards,
Marcin

Hi
Welcome to the confusing world of Invoice *** batch split.. The situation you are facing is due to incorrect customization of your position types in SD during billing of the batch split. Plz check note 77414
You can grossly summarize it as below -
When you have batch split - the line items in Out bound delivery and biling can be divided into 2 types HPOS and UPOS i.e. Main Line items and Sub line items.. The note describes of 3 situations.. Your SD consultant will have to decide which situation you fall in... based on that config changes have to be made in SD....
If your billing is done at HPOS level (Main Item) and not at Item splits level or Vice Versa - Then T codes VOV7 and VTFL, you have to make settings accordingly in the fields "Biling Relevance" and "Cost"..
Also, the item category of HPOS and UPOS has to be different - One has to be relevant for billing/Cost and the other not
Apart from VOV7 and VTFL, check your settings in T code 0184.. Your Item catg has to be assigned against :
Delivery Type / usage Type= CHSP/ Item category Group = "Norm"
To correct the invoices already posted, cancel them and repost after making the config changes...
Regards
Ajay M

Condition types. does not display amount

Dear all,
I have maintained condition types (PR00,KF00,K007). But on the VA01 screen, total amount does not display. For example:PR00=5 eur+KF00=0,5eur =5,5eur and K007 discount for customer 10% of 5,5eur=0,55eur. Here it does not show amount 4,95eur.
What should I do?
Thanks in advance.

The entry should look like this.
<b>Step        Cnter      Ctyp           Description                  From          To</b>
    10                         PR00          Price
    20                         KF00          Freight
    30                         K005          Customer/Material
<b>40                                           Price after Disc               10             30   </b>
Regards
NP

Condition Type for item calculated from delivery date

Dear Experts,
We need that the condition type MWST for PO item will be calculated from Item delivery date ,
But we see that always in Analysis pricing the efected date is PO date and not item delivery date .
Please advise how we should configure the condition ?
Thanks,
Moshe

Hi,
In standard configuration you cannot set item delivery date as a pricing data.
Maybe you shoud look at SAP enchancement - in dedicated structures you can pass additional item data (structure KOKMP).
IMG link:
Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price Determination Process -> System Enhancements
hope it helps.
regards,
wojciech

Condition Type JSRT not picking Condition Base Value in Pricing Procedure

Hi Friends,
In a procedure System is not picking condition base value for condition type JSRT. I have checked the tax procedure and found alternative Cal Type is 17 and is working fine for Domestic vendors.
Friends i need your help in sorting out this issue. Pls suggest what I can check in order to sort out this issue.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja

Hello!
In TAXINN the base value for the condition JSRT is picked up from step 100.
I suggest that you change the "From" value to 100 instead of whatever you may be using
Then test the transaction once again.This will not affect your normal service tax calculation either. So please make this change & try using S1 for planned delivery cost.
Hope this helps !
Cheers!
Plauto
Edited by: Plauto Abreu on Feb 11, 2011 9:03 PM

JMIP Condition type is not Replicated from Po to MIGO excise tab

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for