JMS - Useful from an international point of view?

Hi everyone,
I was wondering if JMS could be useful from a legislative point of view. I mean could it be useful when two companies situated in different countries communicate? Does JMS make this communication easier/better in any way?
Hope someone is able to help me :)

JMS is ideal for the loosely coupled communications which the integration of two different companies or governments would require. However, message oriented middleware has typically been a behind-the-firewall technology. So, while most JMS vendors support messaging over the firewall, it is not their primary focus. Web services are better suited to the type of over-the-Internet integration you are describing. The issue with this, however, is that web services lack transactional support. I think they are working on that though.

Similar Messages

Lost message from server's point of view

Hi All
Following situation:
The JMS-Provider sends a JMS-Message. The message is entirely in the wire and is still flying to the consumer. Before the message arrives to the consumer, the network connection fails, so the client does nothing know about the send message.
From the server’s point of view the message was successfully sent but not acknowledged yet. The server waits for an acknowledge and doesn’t undertake redelivery, because the consumer session on the server is still living.
From the consumer point of view the message was not sent so the client has nothing to ack, so we have some “deadlock”.
The question is – how does server recognize such situation (short connection fail, deadlock) and what does it undertake to guarantee the delivery?
Thank you.

The JMS-Provider sends a JMS-Message. The message is entirely in the wire and is still flying to the consumer. Before the message arrives to the consumer, the network connection fails, so the client does nothing know about the send message.
From the server’s point of view the message was successfully sent but not acknowledged yet. The server waits for an acknowledge and doesn’t undertake redelivery, because the consumer session on the server is still living.
From the consumer point of view the message was not sent so the client has nothing to ack, so we have some “deadlock”.
The question is – how does server recognize such situation (short connection fail, deadlock) and what does it undertake to guarantee the delivery?If the "network connection fails" whilst sending a message then the server (and probably the client) will almost certainly receive a SocketException. A message is unlikely to simply disappear on the wire without at least one end of the socket getting an exception of some kind, and if the socket is simply hanging for some reason then most JMS providers would have a means to detect this (e.g. by sending periodic packets down the wire to check it is still alive).
But ultimately, if a persistent message is sent to a consuming client and the message is not acknowledged (or the transaction committed) then the server will eventually redeliver it. JMS doesn't define exactly when an unacknowledged message is redelivered, but it typically wouldn't happen until the consumer in question has closed.
Nigel

Improving audio quality from a subscriber point of view

Hi,
I am building an application that requires audio chat. When the chat is happening between an Android user and a PC user, the PC user can hear clearly when the Android user speaks. However, when it is the other way around, the Android user hear distorted sound,with noises. Is there any way to improve audio received from a subscriber point of view?
Please advice, thanks!
Regards

Hi Raff,
The Android device is a Samsung Galaxy S i9000 and it is running AIR 2.6, attached below is a snippet of the code related to the audio i am using
<mx:Button x="121" y="700" height="34" width="117" label="Audio" toggle="true" id="audioButt"
click="(audioButt.selected) ? audioPub.publish(): audioPub.stop()" includeIn="LoggedIn"/>
<mx:Button x="242" y="700" height="34" width="117" label="Quality" toggle="true" id="audioButt1" includeIn="LoggedIn"
click="(audioButt.selected) ? audioPub.microphoneManager.encodeQuality = 3 : audioPub.microphoneManager.encodeQuality = 4"/>
<rtc:AudioPublisher id="audioPub" codec="{SoundCodec.SPEEX}" useEchoSuppression="true" silenceLevel="0" />
<rtc:AudioSubscriber/>
I think the problem is related to the script I am writing,I created a button called Quality to reduce the encodeQuality of my PC microphone, will it helps to improve the audio recieved from my Android device?Please advice, thanks!
Regards

Which design is best from a performance point of view?

Hello
I'm writing a small system that needs to track changes to certain columns on 4 different tables. I'm using triggers on those columns to write the changes to a single "change register" table, which has 12 columns. Beacuse the majority of tracked data is not shared between the tables, most of the columns will have null values. From a design point of view it is apparent that having 4 separate change register tables (one for each main table that is being tracked), would be better in terms of avoiding lots of null columns for each row, but I was trying to trade this off against having a single table to see all changes that have been made across the tracked tables.
From a performance point of view though, will there be any real difference whether there are 4 separate tables or 1 single register table? I'm only ever going to be inserting into the register table, and then reading back from it at a later date and there won't be any indexes on it. Someone I work with suggested that there would be more overhead on the redo logs if a single table was used rather than 4 separate tables.
Any help would be appreciated.
David

The volumes of data are going to be pretty small,
maybe a couple of thousand records each day, it's an
OLTP environment with 150 concurrent users max.Consider also the growing of data and if you'll put data constantly to an historical db or if the same tables will contain the increasing number of record.
The point that my colleague raised was that multiple
inserts into a single table across multiple
transactions could cause a lot of redo contention,
but I can't see how inserting into one table from
multiple triggers would result in more redo
contention that inserting into multiple tables. The
updates that will fire the triggers are only ever
going to be single row updates, and won't normally
cause more than one trigger to fire within a single
transaction. Is this a fair assumption to make?
David
I agree with you, the only thing I will consider, instead of redo problem, is the locking on the table that could be generated when logs of different tables will have to be put in a single table, i mean if after insert of a log record you could need to update it....
In this case if 2 or more users have to update the same log you could have problems.

Handling Unit Information from sap mm point of view

Hi all.
Looking for Handling Unit Information from sap mm point of view.
Regards.
Parameshwar
Note : Please search forum before posting.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Sep 22, 2011 1:20 PM

Please refer the below links
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/LOHU/LOHU.pdf
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/html/G74_BB_EN_US.htm

Levels of planning from sap mm point of view

Hi All.
Need Information On Levels of planning from sap mm point of view.
Thanks in advance all sap mm forum guys
Regards.
Parameshwar.

Please check
[MRP Areas|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/c4/106956ae8a11d1a6720000e83235d4/frameset.htm]
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/c4/106956ae8a11d1a6720000e83235d4/frameset.htm]

Responce times from end-user point of view

Hi,
I am looking for the way how to collect responce times from end-user point of view.
Logging of function execution via DMS is not enogh thus we need to discover and monitor problems in all components including poor network, users terminals etc.
Regards,
Tomasz

Hi,
I am looking for the way how to collect responce times from end-user point of view.
Logging of function execution via DMS is not enogh thus we need to discover and monitor problems in all components including poor network, users terminals etc.
Regards,
Tomasz

OIF-What's the diff. from user's point of view of SP/IdP initiated SSO

I'm using OIF for federated single sign on. I got both the SP and IdP initiated SSO works. When I provide both URL to customer, how should I suggest which one to use? from end user's point of view, both of them works in the similar work flow: type(click) URL -> redirect to IdP's login page -> login -> return back to application. only diff. seems the URL. most of user even did not notice the diffrence between 2 URLs.
Could some give some suggestion when and which one is preferred.
Thanks

Probabaly. however, in our case, the application url, e.g. http://appurl is used for non-federate sign on. so that the applicaiton can be run independent of IdP, e.g. IdP down.
To allow federate sign on, we use one of following (as documented in OIF admin guide):
SP initiated:
http://SP host:port/ fed/sp/initiatesso?providerid=<SP provider Id>& returnurl=<http://appurl>
IdP initiated:
http://IdP host:port/fed/idp/initiatesso?providerid =<IdP provider Id>& returnurl=<http://appurl>
So, you can see these does not support bookmark of federate sso since they would return back to http://appurl after federate sign on.
Any suggestion? we couldn't tell good diffrence about above urls to our customer. is there anyway to allow us enable bookmark the federated sso?
Thanks

Is Using Static functions advisable from performance(speed) point of view

I was wondering if using a static function would be slower than using a normal function, especially when the function is to be accessed by multiple threads since the same memory area is used each time the static function is accessed from any of the threads. Thus is it right if I say that static functions are not suitable for multiThreaded access ?

I was wondering if using a static function would be
slower than using a normal function,Static functions are linked at compile time, while normal functions have to be linked based on the runtime type of the object they are called on. This lookup means that static function invocations are likely to be faster.
especially when
the function is to be accessed by multiple threads
since the same memory area is used each time the
static function is accessed from any of the threads.If you are talking about the code segment, where the function definition is held, there is only a single copy of each "normal" function as well. The code segment is also read-only, so there are no issues with multiple threads reading and executing the same code at the same time.
There are the normal issues with multi-threaded access to variables in static functions that exist with normal functions.
Thus is it right if I say that static functions are
not suitable for multiThreaded access ?Static functions are no safer than non-static functions in terms of thread safety. On the other hand, it is no more dangerous having multiple threads calling a static function than having multiple threads calling a non-static function on the same object. Exactly the same thread safety techniques apply whether you are working in a static or a non-static context.
With the above in mind, there is a great deal of design difference between static functions and non-static functions. They mean very different things when creating a system, and an operation that is suited for a static function is very likely not appropriate in a non-static context, and vice versa. The important thing is to make sure the design is appropriate for what the system is trying to do.
The most common use of static functions is for object creation... The Factory design pattern uses static methods to create objects of a given type, the Singleton design pattern uses static methods to allow access to itself.

Transaction codes from end user point of view

hi all,
I am expecting end user transaction codes of warehouse management.
I am familiar with materials management but looking to learn WM.
regards,
nitin patil

Hi refer bellow Tcodes,
WM
0.LI21 - Clear the stock from inventory
1.LB01 - Create Transfer Requirement
2.LB02 - Change transfer requirement
3.LB03 - Display Transfer Requirement
4.LB10 - TRs for Storage Type
5.LB11 - TRs for Material
6.LB12 - TRs and Posting Change for MLEat.Doc.
7.LB13 - TRs for Requirement
8.LD10 - Clear decentralized inventory difference
9.LD11 - Clear differences for decentral.sys.
10.LI01 - Create System Inventory Record
11.LI02 - Change System Inventory Record
12.LI03 - Display System Inventory Record
13.LI04 - Print System Inventory Record
14.LI05 - Inventory History for Storage Bin
15.LI06 - Block Storage types for annual invent.
16.LI11 - Enter Inventory Count
17.LI12 - Change inventory count
18.LI13 - Display Inventory Count
19.LI14 - Start Inventory Recount
20.LI20 - Clear Inventory Differences WM
21.LI21 - Clear Inventory Differences in MM-IM
22.LL01 - Warehouse Activity Monitor
23.LLVS - WM Menu
24.LN01 - Number Ranges for Transfer Requirement
25.LN02 - Number Ranges for Transfer Orders
26.LN03 - Number Ranges for Quants
27.LN04 - Number Ranges for Posting Changes
28.LN05 - Number Ranges for Inventory
29.LN06 - Number Ranges for Reference Number
30.LN08 - Number Range Maintenance: LVS_LENUM
31.LP10 - Direct picking for PO
32.LP11 - WM staging of crate parts WM运
33.LP12 - Staging release order parts (WM-PP)
34.LP21 - WM replenishment for fixed bins WM
35.LP22 - Replenishment Planning for Fixed Bins
36.LQ01 - Transfer Posting in Invent. Mgmt
37.LQ02 - Transfer Posting in Invent. Mgmt
38.LS01 - Create Warehouse Master Record
39.LS02 - Change Warehouse Master Record
40.LS03 - Display Warehouse Master Record
41.LS04 - Display Empty Storage Bins
42.LS05 - Generate Storage Bins
43.LS06 - Block Storage Bins
44.LS07 - Block Quants
45.LS08 - Block Storage Bins per Aisle
46.LS09 - Display Material Data for Storage Type
47.LS11 - Change storage bins (multiple proc.)
48.LS12 - Block Storage type
49.LS22 - Change Quants
50.LS23 - Display Quants
51.LS24 - Display Quants for Material
52.LS25 - Display Quants per Storage Bin
53.LS26 - Stock of Material
54.LS27 - Display Quants for storage unit
55.LS28 - Display storage units / bin
56.LS32 - Change storage unit
57.LS33 - Display storage unit
58.LS41 - List of control cycles for WIP loc
59.LT01 - Create Transfer Order
60.LT02 - Create TO for Inventory Difference
61.LT03 - Create TO from Delivery Note
62.LT04 - Create TO from TR
63.LT05 - Process Posting Change Notice
64.LT06 - Create TO for Material Document
65.LT07 - Create TO for mixed storage unit
66.LT08 - Manual addition to storage unit
67.LT09 - ID point function for storage units
68.LT0A - Pre-plan storage units
69.LT0B - Stock Placement of Shipping Units
70.LT0C - Stock Removal of Shipping Units
71.LT0D - Stock Transfer of Shipping Units
72.LT0E - Create Removal TO for 2-Step Picking
73.LT10 - Create Transfer Order from List
74.LT11 - Confirm Transfer Order Item
75.LT12 - Confirm Transfer Order
76.LT13 - Confirm TO for storage unit
77.LT14 - Confirm preplanned TO item
78.LT15 - Canceling transfer order
79.LT16 - Canceling TO for storage unit
80.LT17 - Single Entry of Actual Data
81.LT1A - Change Transfer Order
82.LT21 - Display Transfer Order
83.LT22 - Display Transfer Order / Storage Type
84.LT23 - Display Transfer Orders by Numbers
85.LT24 - Display Transfer Order / Material
86.LT25 - Display Transfer Order / Reference
87.LT26 - Transfer orders for storage bin
88.LT27 - Transfer order for storage unit
89.LT28 - Display Transfer Order / Reference
90.LT31 - Print TO Manually
91.LT32 - Print transfer order for storageunit
92.LT41 - Prepare TRs for Multiple Processing
93.LT42 - Create TOs by Multiple Processing
94.LT43 - Forming groups for deliveries
95.LT44 - Release for Multiple Processing
96.LT45 - Evaluation of reference numbers
97.LT51 - Maintain Missing Stock
98.LT63 - Control: Single Entry of Actual Data
99.LT64 - Single Entry of Actual Data
100.LT72 - Determine 2-step relevance
101.LT73 - Display 2-step
102.LU01 - Create Posting Change Notice
103.LU02 - Change Posting Change Notice
104.LU03 - Display Posting Change Notice
105.LU04 - Selection of Posting Change Notices
106.LX01 - List of Empty Storage Bins
107.LX02 - Inventory List
108.LX03 - Bin Status Report
109.LX04 - Capacity Used
110.LX05 - Block Bins in Bl.Storage w .Time Limt
111.LX06 - Inventory List for Fire Department
112.LX07 - Check storage
113.LX08 - Accident Regulations List
114.LX09 - Overview of All Transfer Requirements
115.LX10 - Activities per Storage Type
116.LX11 - Overview of Documents
117.LX12 - Document Overview: Landscape Format
118.LX13 - Analysis of Differences
119.LX14 - Analysis of Material Transfers
120.LX15 - Selection of Bins for Annual Inventory
121.LX16 - Selection of Bins for Continuous Inventory
122.LX17 - List of Inventory Differences
123.LX18 - Statistics of Inventory Differences
124.LX19 - Inventory Data Takeover by Batch Inp.
125.LX20 - Generate interim storage bins
126.LX21 - Pick List for Several Transfer Order
127.LX22 - Process Inventory from Overview
128.LX23 - Stock comparison IM - WM
129.LX24 - Display of Hazardous Material numbers
130.LX25 - Inventory Status
131.LX26 - Inventory in WM via cycle counting
132.LX27 - Stock levels by shelf life expiry date
133.LX28 - Relevant TO item for ext.system
134.LX29 - Fixed bin supervision
135.LX30 - Overview of WM messages ext.system
136.LX31 - Analysis of print control tables
137.LX32 - Archived transfer orders
138.LX33 - Archived transfer requirements
139.LX34 - Archived posting change notices
140.LX35 - Archived system inventory records
141.LX36 - Archived inventory histories
142.LX37 - Linked objects
143.LX38 - Check Report Customizing Strategy K
144.LX39 - Evaluation Reference No. for 2-S.Pck
145.LX40 - Material Situation Prod. Storage Bin
146.LX41 - Bin Status Report WM/PP Interface
147.LX42 - Evaluation PP Order from WM View
148.LX43 - Consistency Check for Control Cycles MCL9
WM: Material Plcmt/Removal:Selection
149.MCLD - WM: Material flow - Selection
150.MCLH - WM: Movement types - selection -
151.OL01 - Display / change LDK34 (bins)
152.OL02 - Display / change RLPLA (bins)
153.OL03 - Display / change LDK33 (stock)
154.OL04 - Display / change RLBES (stock)
155.OL05 - Display / change LDK30 (mat.whse)
156.OL06 - Display / change LDK31 (mat.type)
157.OL07 - Data transfer stor.bins LDK34->RLPLA
158.OL08 - Data transfer stor.bins RLPLA->B.I.
159.OL09 - Data transfer stor.bins LDK34->LAGP
160.OL10 - Test storage bin data transfer
161.OL11 - Data transfer stock LDK33->RLBES
162.OL12 - Data transfer stock RLBES-> B.I.
163.OL13 - Data transfer stock LDK33->LQUA
164.OL14 - Test stock data transfer
165.OL15 - Data transfer material whse no.view
166.OL16 - Test mat.master data transfer (MLGN)
167.OL17 - Data transfer material storage type
168.OL18 - Test mat.master data transfer (MLGT)
169.OLVS C SD Menu for Master Data
170.VM01 - Create Hazardous Material
171.VM02 - Change Hazardous Material
172.VM03 - Display Hazardous Material
WM-DWM
Decentralized Warehouse Management
1.DZ00 - Introduction to Decentralized Systems
2.LD01 - Repost Communication Document
3.LD02 - Reposting multiple comm.records
4.LD03 - Display Communication Document
5.LD04 - Evaluation of Communication Doc
6.LD05 - Check LDK01 Records (internal call)
7.LD06 - Check LDK02 Records
8.LD07 - Check LDK03 Records
9.LD08 - Check LDK04 Records (internal call)
10.LD09 - Check LDK05 records
11.LN07 - Number Ranges for WM Communic.Rec.

Exch 2013 Installation and configuration from a SBS point of view?

I was just wondering if anyone has stumbled upon any good "how-to" sites for those of us that (up to now) have been used to using SBS servers but now find ourselves needing to go the manual route with separate new servers (domain controller and
Exchange 2013 server)?
I'm trudging along with my first Server 2012 R2 and Exchange 2013 SP1 installation and configuration, but since I'm used to things configuring themselves in SBS, the piecemeal approach to 2013 is presenting challenges for me.
Considering the market for SBS is small business (and for me, typical 20 users), I'm looking for some direction and help in configuring these new servers to act like SBS 2011 replacement servers, with similar capabilites, etc...from the viewpoint of an SBS
administrator, per se.
Maybe nothing exists and we have to start from scratch, but I was hoping with as big as the SBS market was, there would be some useful info out there with the realization that we're coming from SBS.
Thanks.

Hello,
It seems you have installed the Exchange Server and preparing to move mailboxes to the new host. You can check the application log to check whether the new installed Exchange works
fine.
If there are any error ID/reports, you can post them here for our referernce.
Thanks,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Class theory from a designers point of view

Short history of me. I have been using flash since version 3 as a designer. There you go, right onto the question!
I want to know how to make an object that I have manually placed on the stage from the library with a Class attached to it, interact with the Document Class?
So I am basically dragging the item onto the stage and this item has a class attached and the Document Class with all of its SubClasses needs to know this exists.
Now I was dabbling with making geometry wars to learn AS3 Classes and it was great fun, I set up the Document Class, my enemies and Player 1 Spaceship. I worked out my different SubClasses, and everything was added to the stage by AddChild() along with all SubClasses being created through the Document Class....
Every Class Object was linked to the Document Class as everything was created either by it or through SubClasses under it. So I had full control to do what I wanted. However, all I ever see are elements generated dynamically to the stage. As a designer I want to animate things here and there and then at specific times possibly gain control of this item with it's Class attached, but I want the Document to have a link to this Item.
Also can everybody please stop generating text boxes dynamically all of the time. just create a MovieClip with the form elements on it if it's a form that isnt going to change in layout at all. But this leads onto the same sort of questions, the items arent being created and added to the stage as objects so you still have to make the MovieClip Class understand the items under it exist, I would do it by the Instance Name but is this dirty these days in AS3...
Does any of this make sense? :-S am I asking questions that are maybe puzzling other designers looking at AS3 Code?
Cheers you lot :-)

No one is forcing you to place things on the stage. Everything can be done from code and it will all be really neat and tidy and clean. If that is how you want to roll.
But I think you are really making a false dichotomy between AS2 and AS3. You are more stating the difference between AS1 and AS3. With the exception of assigning the Document class AS2 also greatly supports separating you classes, OOP, reusing code, etc. Just not quite to the level of AS3. It is more a difference of degree, not kind.
I think the dichotomy you are feeling is the difference between Flash, which has a rich heritage as a visually creative tool, and some other programming languages which don't.
In AS2, with the aforementioned lack of a Document class, within your linked classes (that extended MovieClip) you could easily place something on the timeline and then reference it in your code the same way as Kglad has shown here. Pretty similar to AS3. Or you could go to a little more trouble and generate them using code.
But the trouble is the issue. Somethings are just a little too difficult to do with code or even if they can be the nuance and feeling of a good animation is often very hard to capture with code. And the ability to update some visual things is very difficult with code. So let's take an example from my world.
Suppose you are making an e-learning game, a drag and drop type activity. The user needs to drag some items arranged in a sort of frame around the outside of the screen into the center of the screen. Now also suppose that the items sort of start in the middle of the screen and explode/move to the outside edge.
The beauty of Flash is that you can just plop those DragClip instances on the stage, tween them around, and visually organize how they should look. Takes, what, maybe a 2 minutes. Doing that it code and refining it could easily take a day.
Then a year later the instructional designer comes and says, "We are making some updates but switch these three drags positions, delete this one, add these 2 new ones and make the placing animation take 2 seconds longer." Again, the fix is just a couple of minutes. But reviewing the code and if it wasn't made perfectly extensible...well I wouldn't want to be doing that.
So all in all I would say it is just another tool and you should use it when it makes sense and not use it when it doesn't.
BTW, the document class will by default declare all placed clips for itself so that is how you can reference them as kglad showed. I like using that feature because I don't have to go in and declare everything. But I usually do it anyways. At the top of my document (or otherwise) class I usually do this:
// Stage placed assets
var drag1:DragClip;
var myButton:MovieClip;
var andSoOn:TextField;
That way I don't get unknown property errors and I (or anyone else who has to update edit my code) can remember what was stage placed when I come back to the file 6 months later.

Step by step Funds Management (from a user point of view)

Hi,
Kindly provide me the details of the steps (step by step) to be followed to upload the budget (by a user).
Regards,
Vikas Malhotra

Hi Viki,
Check out this doc
http://www.copacustomhelp.state.pa.us/infopak/nav/budget/index.htm
Assign points if useful
Regards
Genie

Don't understand Verizon policy from a business point of view

I have a basic 2 line account with Verizon ( no smartphones) which I have had for years. I have had contracts renewed over and over when the contract expired. Now I am looking to upgrade to 2 smartphone plans but have 3 months left under my current contract. I was told I wasn't allowed to renew the contract while an existing contract is in place ( not even if the new plan is a larger plan) I did have the option to use EDGE to pay 20 per month for each phone, I thought it would be 20 per month until the old contract is up, kind of like a pro rate type of deal. But No, I had to pay 20 per month until the full 800 is paid in full..........but if I wait 3 months until my contract is up I can get the phones for nothing.
So, I 'll wait 3 months, but in the meantime you can bet I will check out other carriers and see what they have to offer. I just don't understand why Verizon would risk losing a customer or customers over 3 months even if the customer wants to lock themselves in with a larger plan that only has 3 months to go on the older contract. Kind of like sports free agency, lock them in while you can, especially when it is benefitting the company in the long run.

Swoosh2229 wrote:
But you ask would that even make sense with the new car analogy? Yes it does make sense, especially when the new car will be completely free of charge in 3 months.
What??? You have only 3 monthly payments left on your CURRENT car and you trade it in for a NEW car. You think if you make 3 payments after getting the NEW car it would be paid off in full??? Possibly if trading in a BMW and getting a Honda Civic in exchange, otherwise you would have SEVERAL(years) payments before that car would be "completely free of charge".
Funny, I've never seen a car dealership offer financing for new cars with a 3 month payback option. They are normally 36, 48, 60 and 72 months to pay off the financing. Never seen a 3 month financing deal. THOSE must be some pretty SUBSTANTIAL payments. Learn something new every day.

Two questions on dynamic parameter from java API point of view

Hi,
We have a requirement for dynamic parameters in crystal reports that need to be executed in java application. Since, crystal java framework do not support the dynamic parameter execution (please correct me if I am wrong), we plan to execute explicitly the query for getting the dynamic values of such dynamic parameters before listing the parameters in java application.
The query for the dynamic parameter will be given in the field 'Prompt Group Text' of the parameter.
I coudl not get hold of these details from java api. So please some one help me out.
Environment - Crystal X1 R2 with java libraries
1. How can we identify a parameter is a dynamic one?
2. How to get the 'Prompt Group Text' field value?
Any suggestions welcome.
Thanks,
Ratan.

There are these two methods in the Business Objects Enterprise SDK Developer Libary:
byte[]   getDynamicCascadePromptData()
           Returns a collection that contains dynamic cascading prompt data.
java.lang.String getDynamicCascadePromptGroupID()
                        Returns a dynamic cascade prompt group ID.
For more information on what is available through available SDK's, please refer to the following link:
http://devlibrary.businessobjects.com/BusinessObjectsXIR2SP2/en/devsuite.htm

JMS - Useful from an international point of view?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for