Jnlp-launch consumes too much time to operate

Hello all!
I want to discuss the UX we have using jnlp launch in JavaFX.
You can find jira-discussion here:
http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-14930
As you can see, it was recognized as major bug.
What's wrong with jnlp-start?
1. When user launch jnlp-file, red confusing window "Java 7..." appears immediately.
While it can be slightly useful in promotion purposes, but many of today's users will be disturbed. There is no association "Java means cool" today. Users wanted to launch new sexy app, but all they see is strange poster with "Java........."
Imagine pop-up window with "Adobe Flash XX.XXX" for several seconds every time when you try to launch flash game. Is it fine UX you await?
2. I don't know, is it independent issue, or tightly coupled with previous one, but jnlp-start really consumes large amount of time.
On my machine with SSD most JavaFX apps can be launched from jar in less than 1 second.
But launching same app via jnlp take about 4-5 seconds total.
I suppose, it is self-evidently that launch of app with .jar files on disk must consume not much time than direct jar-launch.

Hello,
1) Should there even be a jnlp-start pop-up? Maybe a setting with no web-start pop-up or maybe the developer can provide own image to pop-up?
2) It does seem a little slow. I see that in the jnlp file there are references to external URL's.... could it be that these URL's are being accessed every time the JNLP is launched causing this delay? Is the performance of the jnlp startup tied to the performance of the external site and its network?
thanks
jose

Similar Messages

  • Query Consuming too much time.

    Hi,
    i am using Release 10.2.0.4.0 version of oracle. I am having a query, its taking too much time(~7 minutes) for indexed read. Please help me to understand the reason and workaround for same.
      select *
    FROM a,
             b
       WHERE  a.xdt_docownerpaypk = b.paypk
             AND a.xdt_doctype = 'PURCHASEORDER'
             AND b.companypk = 1202829117
             AND a.xdt_createdt BETWEEN TO_DATE (
                                                                 '07/01/2009',
                                                                 'MM/DD/YYYY')
                                                          AND TO_DATE (
                                                                 '01/01/2010',
                                                                 'MM/DD/YYYY')
    ORDER BY a.xdt_createdt DESC;
    | Id  | Operation                      | Name                    | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads  |  OMem |  1Mem | Used-Mem |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                 |                         |      1 |      1 |    907 |00:06:45.83 |   66716 |  60047 |   478K|   448K|  424K (0)|
    |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | a                       |      1 |      1 |    907 |00:06:45.82 |   66716 |  60047 |       |       |          |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                |                         |      1 |      1 |   6977 |00:06:45.64 |   60045 |  60030 |       |       |          |
    |   4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| b                       |      1 |      1 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       4 |      0 |       |       |          |
    |*  5 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_PAYIDENTITYCOMPANY  |      1 |      1 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       3 |      0 |       |       |          |
    |*  6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IDX_XDT_N7              |      1 |   3438 |   6975 |00:06:45.64 |   60041 |  60030 |       |       |          |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - filter(("a"."XDT_CREATEDT"<=TO_DATE(' 2010-01-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
                  "a"."XDT_CREATEDT">=TO_DATE(' 2009-07-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')))
       5 - access("b"."COMPANYPK"=1202829117)
       6 - access("XDT_DOCTYPE"='PURCHASEORDER' AND "a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"="b"."PAYPK")
           filter("a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"="b"."PAYPK")
    32 rows selected.
    index 'idx_xdt_n7' is on (xdt_doctype,action_date,xdt_docownerpaypk).
    index idx_xdt_n7 details are as below.
    blevel   distinct_keys   avg_leaf_blocks_per_key   avg_data_blocks_per_key   clustering_factor       num_rows
    3         868840             1                         47                     24020933               69871000
    But when i am deriving exact value of paypk from table b and applying to the query, its using another index(idx_xdt_n4) which is on index 'idx_xdt_n4' is on (month,year,xdt_docownerpaypk,xdt_doctype,action_date)
    and completes within ~17 seconds. below is the query/plan details.
      select *
      FROM a
        WHERE a.xdt_docownerpaypk = 1202829132
              AND xdt_doctype = 'PURCHASEORDER'
             AND a.xdt_createdt BETWEEN TO_DATE (
                                                                  '07/01/2009',
                                                                  'MM/DD/YYYY')
                                                           AND TO_DATE (
                                                                  '01/01/2010',
                                                                  'MM/DD/YYYY')
    ORDER BY xdt_createdt DESC;
    | Id  | Operation                    | Name                    | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads  |  OMem |  1Mem | Used-Mem |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY               |                         |      1 |   3224 |    907 |00:00:02.19 |    7001 |    339 |   337K|   337K|  299K (0)|
    |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| a                       |      1 |   3224 |    907 |00:00:02.19 |    7001 |    339 |       |       |          |
    |*  3 |    INDEX SKIP SCAN           | IDX_XDT_N4              |      1 |  38329 |   6975 |00:00:02.08 |     330 |    321 |       |       |          |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - filter(("a"."XDT_CREATEDT"<=TO_DATE(' 2010-01-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
                  "a"."XDT_CREATEDT">=TO_DATE(' 2009-07-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')))
       3 - access("a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"=1202829132 AND "XDT_DOCTYPE"='PURCHASEORDER')
           filter(("a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"=1202829132 AND "XDT_DOCTYPE"='PURCHASEORDER'))
    index idx_xdt_n4 details are as below.
    blevel   distinct_keys   avg_leaf_blocks_per_key   avg_data_blocks_per_key   clustering_factor       num_rows
    3         868840             1                         47                     23942833              70224133Edited by: 930254 on Apr 26, 2013 5:04 AM

    the first query uses the predicate "XDT_DOCTYPE"='PURCHASEORDER' to determine the range of the index IDX_XDT_N7 that has to be scanned and uses the other predicates to filter out most of the index blocks. The second query uses an INDEX SKIP SCAN ignoring the first column of the index IDX_XDT_N4 and using the predicates for the following columns ("a"."XDT_DOCOWNERPAYPK"=1202829132 AND "XDT_DOCTYPE"='PURCHASEORDER') to get a much more selective access (reading only 330 blocks instead of > 60K).
    I think there are two possible options to improve the performance:
    1. If creating a new index is an option you could define an index on table A(xdt_doctype, xdt_docownerpaypk, xdt_createdt)
    2. If creating a new index is not an option you could use an INDEX SKIP SCAN Hint (INDEX_SS(A IDX_XDT_N4)) to order the CBO to use the second index (without a hint the CBO tends to ignore the option of using a SKIP SCAN in an NL join). But using Hints in production is rarely a good idea... In 11g you could you sql baselines to avoid such hints in the code.
    Regards
    Martin

  • Transport consumes too much time

    Hi
    Maybe this is not an XI related issue at all.. so sry and just point me to the correct forum.
    We have a "external system - XI - CRM" scenario where external party communicates using SOAP and XI-CRM communication is RFC based. The simplest case is that the external system sends some kind of identification and based on that the CRM should give a response about existing relationships.
    When the RFC function is called in CRM with transaction SE37.. the execution time is about 2-4 seconds. And when the function is called from XI... it takes 1-4 minutes to fetch the answer to XI.
    Is there some configuration settings that might speed the thing up... it seems that loading data from CRM to XI takes time... but in a LAN moving of 0,5MB should not be an issue of minutes.
    Any suggestions. Maybe someone has had similar issues but I have not found any earliel posts on this issue.
    Thanks
    Heiko

    Hello,
    1) Should there even be a jnlp-start pop-up? Maybe a setting with no web-start pop-up or maybe the developer can provide own image to pop-up?
    2) It does seem a little slow. I see that in the jnlp file there are references to external URL's.... could it be that these URL's are being accessed every time the JNLP is launched causing this delay? Is the performance of the jnlp startup tied to the performance of the external site and its network?
    thanks
    jose

  • Taking too much time in Rules(DTP Schedule run)

    Hi,
    I am Scheduling the DTP which have filters to minimize the load data.
    when i run the DTP it is taking too much time in the "rules" (i can see the  DTP monitor ststus package by pakage and step by step like "Start routine" "rules" and "End Routine")
    here it is consuming too much time in Rules Mapping.
    what is the problem and any solutions please...
    regards,
    sree

    Hi,
    Time taken at "rules" depends on the complexity involved there in ur routine. If it is a complex calculation it will take time.
    Also check ur DTP batch settings, ie how many no. of background processes used to perform  DTP, Job class.
    U can find these :
    goto DTP, select goto menu and select "Settings for Batch Manager".
    In the screen increase no of Processes from 3 to higher no(max 9).
    ChaNGE job class to 'A'.
    If ur DTP is still running , cancel it ie Kill the DTP, delete from the Cube,
    Change these settings and run ur DTP one more time.
    U can observer the difference.
    Reddy

  • I updated IOS 6 in my device, it is performing worse. Consuming too much battery in a very short time. How can I "downgrade IOS version?

    I updated IOS 6 in my device, it is performing worse. Consuming too much battery in a very short time. How can I "downgrade IOS version?

    Downgrading isn't supported and wouldn't help.  You need to fix your phone.
    1. Delete and reinstall all email accounts.
    2, Restore the phone in iTunes, first  using a backup and if needed as a new phone.
    iTunes: Restoring iOS software

  • Delete query taking too much time

    Hi All,
    my delete query is taking too much time. around 1hr 30 min for 1.5 lac records.
    Though I have dropped mv log on the table & disabled all the triggers on it.
    Moreover deletion is based on primary key .
    delete from table_name where primary_key in (values)
    above is dummy format of my query.
    can anyone please tell me what could be other reason that query is performing that slow.
    Is there anything to check in DB other than triggers,mv log,constraints in order to improve the performance?
    Please reply asap.

    Delete is the most time consuming operation, as the whole record data has to be stored at the undo segments. On the other hand, there is a part of the query used to select records to delete that probably is adding an extra overhead to the process, the in (values) clause. It would be nice on your side to post another dummy from this (values) clause. I could figure out this is a subquery, and in order for you to obtain this list you have to run a inefficient query.
    You can gather the execution plan so you can see where the most heavy part of th query is. This way a better tuning approach and a more accurate diagnostic can be issued.
    ~ Madrid.

  • Domain creation too much time

    Hi Guys,
    I am trying to create a domain in my windows 7 with following components.
    Oracle database 11.2.0.1
    RCU 11.1.1.5
    weblogic 10.3.6
    IDM suite 11.1.1.5
    Trying to create domain using Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\bin\config.bat and domain creation taking too much time and in the log file i am getting below message
    "java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no GetVolumeInfo in java.library.path" and then it continues with domain creation and getting following message
    NMProcess: INFO: Saving node manager configuration properties to 'C:\Oracle\Middleware\wlserver_10.3\common\nodemanager\nodemanager.properties'
    NMProcess: <Sep 18, 2012 10:32:48 AM> <SEVERE> <Fatal error in node manager server>
    NMProcess: java.lang.NullPointerException
    NMProcess:      at java.util.Hashtable.containsKey(Hashtable.java:307)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServerConfig.initNetworkInfoList(NMServerConfig.java:491)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServerConfig.getNetworkInfoList(NMServerConfig.java:481)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServerConfig.getConfigProperties(NMServerConfig.java:545)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServer.<init>(NMServer.java:154)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServer.main(NMServer.java:375)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.NodeManager.main(NodeManager.java:31)
    NMProcess:
    NMProcess: Sep 18, 2012 10:32:48 AM weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServer main
    NMProcess: SEVERE: Fatal error in node manager server
    NMProcess: java.lang.NullPointerException
    NMProcess:      at java.util.Hashtable.containsKey(Hashtable.java:307)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServerConfig.initNetworkInfoList(NMServerConfig.java:491)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServerConfig.getNetworkInfoList(NMServerConfig.java:481)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServerConfig.getConfigProperties(NMServerConfig.java:545)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServer.<init>(NMServer.java:154)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.nodemanager.server.NMServer.main(NMServer.java:375)
    NMProcess:      at weblogic.NodeManager.main(NodeManager.java:31)
    NMProcess: Stopped draining NMProcess
    NMProcess: Stopped draining NMProcess
    Successfully launched the Node Manager.
    The Node Manager process is running independent of the WLST process.
    Exiting WLST will not stop the Node Manager process. Please refer
    to the Node Manager logs for more information.
    The Node Manager logs will be under C:\Oracle\Middleware\wlserver_10.3\common\nodemanager
    Node Manager starting in the background
    But process won't move forward, it just hangs with Progress 0% only. I checked similar errors in the forums and it is due to path settings but i tried to remove the existing path settings but no luck. If you guys have any idea what went wrong...?
    Thanks,
    Ravindher

    I don't have any CLASSPATH variable and I have only Path variable but nothing was specified to any oracle product except DB(D:\Oracle\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\bin;)
    Even i set java is 1.6 using JAVA_HOME earlier and then removed but no difference. Not sure what went wrong.
    Thanks,
    Ravindher

  • USB consuming too much power -notice

    I get all the time notice/warning that: "USB-device is consuming too much power. Hub/concentrator which the device is connected will be shut down." During this writing I got the notice three times.
    I don't have anything connected to my Macbook Pro (bought year 2006), not even mouse, just power wire.
    What to do? I don't see any difference after the notice (that something has been shut down). It is just popping up all the time and makes working with the computer really annoying. It might be related situations the when computer is moved, or something.
    Can I swich some USB-port/device off? Thank you in advance already!

    I had the same problem which arose just after I lost an external hard disk (Lacie 1 Tb started to make loud clicking sounds). I'm not sure whether I lost the hard disk because the break down of the USB-ports or whether I lost the USB-ports because of the break down of the hard disk (?).
    Either way I get the same warning and after resetting the SMC and the PRAM I reinstalled the OS. Nothing of it helped. Instead I went to the authorised Apple service partner. And now it gets scary for real.
    Apparently the USB-ports are an integrated part of the logic board (not just a card) and I need to get a new logic board to fix the USB-ports. Price 10.000 DKK. A new MacBook Pro will set me back 13.800 DDK (divide those figures by 5,8 to get US $).
    I'm in some kind of chock. The MacBook is not yet 18 months old and works fine - except for the USB ports that I do need for connecting my camera, external hard drives and my iPhone......
    /Soren

  • Consuming too much temp space

    Dear All
    A technical colleague of mine is executing a procedure which selects data from two databases and inserts it into the third one. The procedure is not new and he has been executing the same since a year now.However in past two weeks the procedure is either consuming too much amount of time ( 3-4 hours as against 10-12 mins ) or it fails as it utilises more amount of temp space on the database on which insertions are made. In the temporary tablespace i added about 10gb more but it is still not suffice for the procedure to execute successfully.The sga for the database onto which insertion is done is 2560M and pga for the same is 2G.
    Please suggest what is to be done as it is an extremely crucial procedure.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    rdxdba

    If you have Diagnostic Pack licence try to use AWR to compare instance activity for this procedure execution. If not try to install Statspack.
    I recommend also to use SQL trace to have trace data for a "good" execution and for a "bad" execution and to compare TKPROF output for related trace files.
    If you are using Oracle 10 or 11 try to use DMBS_MONITOR as described in http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/10g/SQLTrace10046TrcsessAndTkprof10g.php.

  • Yosemite OS is consuming too much internet data in the background

    Yosemite OS is consuming too much internet data in the background for no apparent reason. It's draining my monthly internet quota. It's important to note that iCloud Drive and photo stream are disabled. Anyone knows how to sove this problem? Otherwise, if there's no solution I think I'll downgrade to Mavericks.

    I'm wondering if you ever resolved this issue. My internet access is via satellite with highly allocated data usage. Ever since updating to Yosemite, my usage has gone through the roof. I've disable automatic downloads and any settings (including iCloud photo stream) that might receive or send data, plus I never use Spotlight. Data usage goes to zero when I shut off WiFi, so it seems obvious that something running in the background is the culprit. Apple is looking into this, with no results so far - meanwhile, I've lost hours of time playing detective, and hoping my ISP won't cut me off. No fun!
    Thanks for any ideas you have...

  • Firefox consumes too much RAM, caused by js

    I'm having problems with Firefox consuming too much RAM memory. Several people are complaining about this but I did some further research before posting here, using about:memory, and I found out that js-non-window and js-main-runtime are causing this.
    When I start up a blank Firefox session I immediately have an allocation of 260MB of RAM. About 75-80% of this is taken up by those two js (javascript?) processes.
    After opening about 10 tabs with different webpages the RAM usage has gone up to about 750MB. During the time the tabs are open most of the extra MB's are consumed by the window-objects (40MB per page, still seems quite a lot to me for just a news site with one article...) but after closing them the memory usage didn't go down and it transferred to the two already mentioned js processes. This transfer to the js processes is not always the case, it seems to happen only if I open a lot of tabs, let's say 10+ perhaps.
    I tried disabling Javascript using the plugin SettingSanity, but this makes browsing quite uncomfortable of course and worst of all it doesn't solve the problem. The mentioned processes keep using the same amount of RAM.
    I have this exact same problem on all my computers and laptops so it can't be a coincidence. Is there nothing I can do about this? Is this under investigation? How can a browser with 10 web pages open need almost 800MB of RAM?
    And please don't answer "install more RAM". The pc I have most problems with has 2GB of physical RAM and I really do think that opening 10 web pages should be possible on such a computer. Doing the same in Internet Explorer consumes less than half the amount of RAM memory.
    P.S: I sent this query using IE because I could't get to this page in Firefox. The "Ask This" button didn't work...

    Try in Firefox's safe mode disable all plugins, and open with only a new tab set by using ''about:blank'' . As suggested above also consider as a test creating and using a new Firefox profile.
    When I start like that I have around 70MB explicit shown in ''about:memory'' and that includes ''js-non-window'' of around 30MB
    I know in the past I have opened more than 10 tabs on a machine with less than 1GB ram installed and not noticed problems.

  • Firefox 12 STILL consumes too much memory and periodically stalls

    1. This has gone on actually since at least Firefox 8 for many of us. With Windows 7 32 or 64bit, AND we are told OTHER OS's as well, Firefox 12 IS consuming too much memory!
    When FF 12 memory consumption "hits" 800MB on a 8 GB machine, and continues to slowly climb, FF 12 has code or other problems.
    2. ALSO, Firefox 12 under many circumstances, is slowing to a crawl, especially in opening windows and tabs.
    NOTHING we do, inspect with memory tools, etc. seems to point to any "culprits" or guide the way to researching and potentially solving these problems...and they ARE problems within Firefox 12, and likely earlier versions.
    TIME TO CLEAR THE AIR?
    These are problems being seen by others, with or without any (totally blanked out/disabled) Add-On's and even most Plug-In's being disabled or removed, both for testing the problems sen in FF 12.
    There IS a problem, or more than one, here, and it's not isolated or "just refer to this checklist" solvable.
    There's problems, perhaps memory leaks and other agenda IN THE CODE.
    We users need to stop being poo-poo'ed and "pampered" by needless communications that do nothing to truly address the problems.

    I encountered this after the memory leak was mentioned as pat of a slowdown issue with an add-on that has been in use as long as I've been using Firefox (All-in one sidebar -AIOS). After a relatively short length of time under both Firefox 11 and 12 it starts to slow down. Sub menus take more than a second to show up when the parent menu is clicked, links take more than a second to activate, pages don't load as quickly. (I have a 30Mbps downstream internet connection that I test regularly, and consistently shows between 25 and 30MBps speeds from multiple sites throughout the US. It's NOT my download speed.)
    In looking for explanations I saw at least one mention of a memory Leak.
    So I decided to test this for myself. I first removed AIOS, then re-started Firefox and just left it running. I did nothing except minimize and restore it a few times. About an hour later the memory used by FF had gone from a reasonable 42K or so, to over 200K.
    I tested again after uninstalling ALL my add-ons and plug ins. The same thing happened again.
    This is NOT simply high memory use. Which I interpret as a particular tasks or process using more memory than it maybe should.
    This is quite clearly a memory leak. Nothing was being executed, nothing was running with Firefox, and no pages were loaded during this time. But he use memory just steadily grew.
    This is clearly a new issues since I did NOT have this problem when I was using Firefox 8. If I can find an install of that I'm going back to it.
    If not I'll settle for the ESR mentioned here. If nothing else it seems to have a slower leak.
    I never did like the new version number / rapid release schedule. Mostly because growing version numbers at that rate made no real sense to me as a developer myself. But also because speed of release for new features should not be the target but quality. I think we can see that this has clearly fallen by the wayside.
    I only wish I thought there was a viable alternative.

  • Too much Time until logon window after applying Security Configuration Wizard on DC

    Hi,
    The scenario is the following:
    Domain Controller on Windows 2012 R2
    DHCP installed on Domain Controller
    Clients: Win7, Win8
    Servers: Win2008/R2, Win2012 R2
    After applying a SCW template on a DC, the logon window takes too much time to appear (after reboot, lock or sign out).
    The seetings in the template are the following:
    Select Server Roles: All of the default options selected by SCW
    Select Client Features: All of the default options selected by SCW
    Select Administration and Other Options: All of the default options selected by SCW
    Select Additional Services: All of the default options selected by SCW
    Handling Unspecified Services: Do not change the startup mode of the service
    Network Security Roles: All of the default options selected by SCW
    Require SMB Security Features: 2 checkboxes marked
    Require LDAP Signing: the checkbox marked
    Outbound Authentication Methods: Domain Accounts
    Outbound Authentication using Domain Accounts: 2 checkboxes marked
    Inbound Authentication Methods: none of the checkboxes marked
    System Audit Policy: Audit successful activities
    The question is:
    What options(s) include/exclude from SCW template that avoid too much time logon windows takes to appear?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    Based on my research, SCW helps administrators to ensure that only those services, application capabilities, and ports required for the roles to function are available; anything not specifically needed by the roles the server holds will be disabled. These
    tasks above all consume time to implement, which causes the delay for the Windows logon screen to display.
    Therefore, as the way I see it, it is a normal behavior, and I didn’t find any option which could avoid/reduce time spent on applying settings within the SCW template.
    More information for you:
    The Security Configuration Wizard
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2007.04.securitywatch.aspx
    Security Configuration Wizard
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754997.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Amy
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Sites Taking too much time to open and shows error

    hi, 
    i've setup sharepoint 2013 environement correctly and created a site collection everything was working fine but suddenly now when i am trying to open that site collection or central admin site it's taking too much time to open a page but most of the time
    does not open any page or central admin site and shows following error
    event i go to logs folder under 15 hive but nothing useful found please tell me why it takes about 10-12 minutes to open a site or any page and then shows above shown error. 

    This usually happens if you are low on hardware requirements.  Check whether your machine confirms with the required software and hardware requirements.
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262485.aspx
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/58370/minimum-real-world-system-requirements-for-sharepoint-2013
    Please remember to up-vote or mark the reply as answer if you find it helpful.

  • White MacBook takes too much time to boot up

    Hi there.
    I got the topcase(keyboard) of my MacBook repaired. (White MacBook 2006) and after that it takes nearly 7 up to 10 seconds after pressing the power button that I first see apple logo and it boots up.
    I'm not sure but seems like that detecting the hardwares take too much time .
    any solution?
    PS: I'm running Snow Leopard(10.6.2)

    macbig wrote:
    OK, 32 seconds is not good. I don't think it has anything to do with a keyboard repair. You need to try a little maintenance: Reset Pram - http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=2238
    Repair Permissions - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1452
    Run Disk Utility >applications>utilities>disk utilities>verify disk
    How much free space do you have on your HD: Right click on HD icon and select "get info" in the drop down menu (if you don't have right click capabilities, highlight your HD icon, go file in the Apple menu, and select "get info" in the drop down menu. Let us know your results.
    Yes PRAM was the the problem, I've already tried it from this thread http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2303507&tstart=0
    by the way thank you .

Maybe you are looking for