Job co-ordinator cjq0 process not spawning job slave processes ( j0XX )

Hello,
We are having 9.2.0.6 database and our dbms jobs scheduled from discoverer are stuck.
We could run those jobs manually from sqlplus using dbms_job.run(job_id) but jobs scheduled from discoverer are in scheduled state only.
We are having around 105 jobs stuck in the database. Basically , cjq0 process died and we restarted it using below commands,
SQL> show parameter job_queue_processes
10
SQL> alter system set job_queue_processes=0
SQL> alter system set job_queue_processes=10
This started cjq0 processes but this process is not forking other job slave processes. We have replicated this scenario in our DEV environment by killing j0XX processes and found cjq0 takes care of forking job slave processes again but somehow it's not happening in PROD.
This might be because of,
1) There are many jobs stuck so I should clear dbms_jobs and then should restart cjq0 process.
2) I might have to restart the database.
Being this production environment, I am not able to experiment . Let me know your views !!
Thanks,
Prasad

Hi,
Below is the output,
SQL> select * from v$resource_limit where resource_name in ('processes','sessions');
RESOURCE_NAME CURRENT_UTILIZATION MAX_UTILIZATION
INITIAL_ALLOCATION LIMIT_VALUE
processes 1225 2060
6000 6000
sessions 1535 3210
6800 6800
and Alert log file contents when the issue occured,
=====================================
Creating archive destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1: '/d01/oraprod/admin/PROD/arch/PROD_1080417.arc'
ARC1: Completed archiving log 6 thread 1 sequence 1080417
Wed Nov 30 09:22:43 2011
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x107c62.2.10], SCN: 0x077e.f4bb0461
Wed Nov 30 09:22:53 2011
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x107c63.2.10], SCN: 0x077e.f4bb9ecd
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1080419
Current log# 8 seq# 1080419 mem# 0: /d03/oradata/PROD/log08a.log
Current log# 8 seq# 1080419 mem# 1: /d05/oradata/PROD/log08b.log
Wed Nov 30 09:22:53 2011
ARC0: Evaluating archive log 10 thread 1 sequence 1080418
ARC0: Beginning to archive log 10 thread 1 sequence 1080418
Creating archive destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1: '/d01/oraprod/admin/PROD/arch/PROD_1080418.arc'
ARC0: Completed archiving log 10 thread 1 sequence 1080418
Wed Nov 30 09:23:20 2011
ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=0 SCOPE=MEMORY;
Wed Nov 30 09:23:39 2011
ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=10 SCOPE=MEMORY;
Wed Nov 30 09:23:39 2011
Restarting dead background process CJQ0
CJQ0 started with pid=1579
Wed Nov 30 09:24:07 2011
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x107c63.2.10], SCN: 0x077e.f4bb9ecd
Wed Nov 30 09:24:14 2011
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x107c64.2.10], SCN: 0x077e.f4bc4a09
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1080420
Current log# 9 seq# 1080420 mem# 0: /d03/oradata/PROD/log09a.log
Current log# 9 seq# 1080420 mem# 1: /d05/oradata/PROD/log09b.log
Wed Nov 30 09:24:14 2011
ARC1: Evaluating archive log 8 thread 1 sequence 1080419
ARC1: Beginning to archive log 8 thread 1 sequence 1080419
Creating archive destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1: '/d01/oraprod/admin/PROD/arch/PROD_1080419.arc'
ARC1: Completed archiving log 8 thread 1 sequence 1080419
Wed Nov 30 09:25:03 2011
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x107c64.2.10], SCN: 0x077e.f4bc4a09
Wed Nov 30 09:25:07 2011
==================================================
Thanks,
Prasad

Similar Messages

Incremental Cube Load Error: job slave process terminated

Hi,
For performance reasons, we switched to Incremental Cube Loading i.e. only those partitions are autosolved whose data is made available.
Some times, the background submitted job terminates and the reason given in dba_scheduler_job_run_details is:
REASON="Job slave process was terminated"
There so no definits occurance pattren for this error.
The job submitted in background is killed.
The last entry the xml_load_log displayed is of Started Auto solving of a partition.
After this error occurs, we have to Full Aggregate the cube; which offcourse would autosolve all partitions.
We have been too much annoyed by this error as we did lot of package changes as part of a release to production to include Incremental cube loading, and once done, we see that incremental cube loading just terminates while autosolving a partitions.
Can any one assist please? Urgent?
thank you,

Hi,
There is a metalink note about this issue. Check note 443348.1
Thanks
Brijesh

BPEL Component not spawning SOA processes

I am trying to get a workflow running that passes a payload consisting of several ucm document metadata elements, a few custom elements, and the DocURL and idcReference to a SOA Composite with a BPEL Process on it.
I have created the Composite in JDeveloper with the SOA plugin, and I have added <binding.adf registryName="" serviceName="soa"> to the service entry in the composite.xml just as the BPEL Component guide tell you to do.
The BPEL Process wizard creates by default a <process_name>.xsd which is used as the payload for the process. It has 1 input field of type string. I replace that 1 field with dID, dDocName, dDocType, xFormType, xNotificationType, xPackageId, xSubmissionId, xBatchId, xBatchDate, docURL, and idcRef, all of type string.
I have deployed it to soa-infra and created a Connection Configuration (tested, works) and Process Configuration with a Configuration ID of "soa" and an action pointing to my BPEL composite and process. I have created Mappings to the BPEL payload tying all of the pertinent UCM fields to their appropriate BPEL payload fields.
I have created a criteria workflow with a step named SendToSOA which has scripts in it exactly like the example given in the BPEL Component Guide, except with "soa" where the Configuration ID should go instead of "process_3". I add another step afterward with review for the "weblogic" user so that I can look at the workflow before it finishes.
I check in content of the appropriate type , and the workflow is engaged, and says that it passes the SendToSOA step, but when I go to soa-infra in EM and look to see if any new processes are spawned, I see no change. No errors or log messages are produced in any of the logs on the UCM or SOA Managed servers.
I have rebuilt this process from the ground up about a hundred times. Once in a while, a deployment will start kicking off processes, with no consistent rhyme or reason. Sometimes, (maybe 1 time in 10) when I have built the BPEL component without changing the payload (meaning I can only pass one piece of data to my BPEL process....), the workflow will start spawning processes.
Once, it started working randomly with a full payload, and it worked fine as a vehicle for 3 separate workflows for an entire day, spawning processes on SOA like a champ, but then because of a design change, I had to change the payload, and add 2 new fields. I deployed the changed BPEL process to SOA with the new payload, and when I went to the update the mappings on the Process Configuration, the Process configuration page made no effort to notice the new payload settings, and the Component Provides no way to tell the Process Configuration to update itself. At first I tried to update the payload in the <processconfiguration>.hda file under <domain>/ucm/cs/data/orabpel/process/, but when I did, the workflow stopped creating bpel processes on the SOA server. Then I tried deleting the configuration and rebuilding it, which did allow me to add the new payload fields in, but still, the workflow would not spawn SOA processes ever again.
I have tried rebooting the UCM and/or SOA managed servers, I have tried rebooting them both, even between each configuration step. I have rebuilt everything from the ground up literally over a hundred times. I have tried it with changing the names of each of the components, from the composite to the bpel process to the adf binding service name to workflow. I have tried disabling and enabling the workflows, I have tries making the adf binding service name entirely unique, or matching the bpel wsdl client name, or matching the bpel process name, or matching the ucm process configuration id. I have tried many different ucm process configuration ids. I have tried simplifying the workflow script down to just <$obInvokeProcess("soa")$> or <$obConfigID="soa"$><$obInvokeProcess(obConfigID)$>. I have tried this whole process both on my development system and on a VM running UCM and SOA, both in linux and windows installations, the behavior is the same on both systems. I have tried it with Asynchronous, Synchronous and One-way BPEL processes.
So far, there has been 5 instances of the workflow suddenly working without any explanation. twice with just the default single input payload created by the BPEL wizard in JDeveloper. Once when I had added one extra input field named input2 (string), but this was on the VM on my laptop, so not useful to my developement effert. I tried re-creating the exact same deployment on dev with the EXACT SAME steps, but on dev the workflow would not spawn SOA processes. Once, the process started working with only the script <$obConfigID="soa"$><$obInvokeProcess(obConfigID)$> in the Entry Eventof the workflow, and once with just <$obInvokeProcess("soa")$>, but trying to re-create this with full payloads failed.
I am at wits end. there is little information on the internet or on otn or on Oracle Support or on intradoc_users yahoo group about the BPEL Component.
Please help?

Sorry for the confusion Vlad.
With "And instance state is being shown as Running" i meant to say was : The instance state that we see in EM whenever we open our composite along with all other details like InstanceID,Name,ConversationIS etc.
"BPEL component instance is not generated.": i meant to say was that whenevr we click on particular instanceid flow trace window pops up where we see the complete trace. I am here not able to see BPEL process .It didnt get invoke overall.
Flow of BPEL as mentioned in my first post:
1. DB is polled using DB adapter(logical delete)
2. response from DB is passed to BPEL process for furthur processing.
3. BPEL after some transformation publishes message in jms queue using JMS adapter.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Karan

Log Info REASON="Job slave process was terminated"

hi,
i'm using oracle 10g, i have scheduled a job in scheduler, the job status is "STOPPED" and shows the log details as Details REASON="Job slave process was terminated". wht can be the reason?
how to resolve it ?
Edited by: user10745179 on Jun 8, 2009 3:28 AM

Was it an external job?
What is the platform and exact version?
Ronald
http://ronr.blogspot.com

Ordinal 55 could not be found in the dynaminc link library iertutil.dll cs5.5 installation problem.

Okay, so when i downloaded the trial version of Flash Professional CS5.5, the following popup "popped up".
"The dynamic link library iertutil.dll could not be found. Reinstalling the application may solve this problem."
So i went to a site that had helped me with this sort of thing before dll-files.com, and downloaded iertutil.dll, and placed it in my System32 folder.
I pressed OK on the previous pop-up, only to be greeted with:
"Ordinal 55 could not be found in the dynaminc link library iertutil.dll"
Flash CS5.5 finished installing and works great, but the same Ordinal 55 popup pops up at least a hundred times a day, (It's even popping up as I write this) even when Flash isn't open
I'm using Windows XP SP2, I have Internet Explorer 6 SP2 (though i usually use Google Chrome Instead)
Thanks in advance...

Hi Bansal,
When does this error start to occur? Check Event Viewer and see if we could find any other messages.
Take a try with the SFC command:
Use the System File Checker tool to repair missing or corrupted system files
Further, try the following if SFC won't help:
How to repair or reinstall Internet Explorer in Windows
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Error ordinal 459 could not be opened. error occurs on every plug in install

I keep getting the error message "ordinal 459 could not be opened" when trying to update flash player or installing any plugin. I have tried every solution that I have read and nothing works.

Try this Microsoft suggestion: [http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_vista-performance/the-ordinal-459-could-not-be-located-in-the/d93d1cdf-763b-4403-bcc8-ca06d16f4f4a]

Ordinal 459 could not be located in dynamic link library.urlmon.dll What the heck is this and how do I fix it?

I get the following message:the ordinal 459 could not be located in the dynamic link library. urlmon.dll. I get this when requesting list links within a genealogy program (not on the internet) Haven't noticed it on anything else yet because I have been obsessing over just that one program. At the same time I notice that my windows sidebar is not visible. Have not changed any settings. Java was disabled due to the recent exploitation. Would that have something to do with it. Or perhaps Firefox18 installed and then it went bad? Thanks in advance for any help. Running Vista.

If this issue is caused after you have applied MS13-008 which is a security update then I would think that this is a Firefox issue and that something changed and they have to find a new way to do what they where doing before the update.
However since the error message states it can't find the file urlmon.dll has anyone checked on why this file is missing or why it is not registered? Since URLMON.DLL is not updated by MS13-008 I would suspect this could be a coincidence.
Here is a related Microsoft KB article about that dll causing similar issues with IE and how to address it.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281679
I mean a quick google of that exact error message "The ordinal 459 could not be located in the dynamic link library urlmon.dll" has results of this problem going back to at least 2011 long before MS13-008 was released. There are a number of solutions as well for different situations posted.
It may be worth checking some of those is the Microsoft KB above doesn't help.
And yet I am left thinking that Tyler's statement from January 16 about it being reported by other uses and apparently being caused by malware is the most likely reason for this issue. He does know Firefox rather well, and he is an employee of Mozilla. So I really would start with his suggestions of checking out their KB's he listed:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-issues-caused-malware
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/reset-firefox-easily-fix-most-problems

The Ordinal 572 Can not be located

Hello I need help, I have a Toshiba Satellite L455D-S5976 over 5 years old. I may have deleted what ever is popping up ,(sound just like a women) ...
But the same words keep popping up {The Ordinal 572 could not be located in the dynamic link library iertutil.dll. } What is this? And how do I get it back?
I have no sound card as well , I can't hear anything it stopped about 4 weeks ago. Thank you

Satellite L455D-S5976
The Ordinal 572 could not be located in the dynamic link library iertutil.dll.
What are you doing when the message occurs? Can you repeat it on demand?
Please attach a picture of that message to your reply so we can tell where it comes from.
I have no sound card
Open Device Manager (devmgmt.msc) and expand Sound, video and game controllers. Anything unusual in there? We like to see pictures.
-Jerry

Ordinal 96 could not be located

Windows 7 32-bit. Installed Practice Master case management palm conduits. When I try to open Hotsync manager I get the following error message.
The ordinal 96 could not be located in the dynamic link library CONGMGR.dll.
Was able to sync to Palm Desktop before that. Spent hours with PM support, am on hold right now, with no success in syncing. First problem was getting conduits installed, now above message.
Anyone fixed a ordinal 96 issue, and how?
Post relates to: Treo 755p (Sprint)

You might need to talk with the authors of the program, not Palm!
It was able to sync before on Windows 7, or another version of Windows?
WyreNut
I am a Volunteer here, not employed by HP.
You too can become an HP Expert! Details HERE!
If my post has helped you, click the Kudos Thumbs up!
If it solved your issue, Click the "Accept as Solution" button so others can benefit from the question you asked!

Core40.dll, Ordinal 435 Could not be found...

I am getting the following error message when attempting to launch any Oracle Developer 6.0 application:
"The ordinal 435 could not be located in the dynamic link library CORE40.dll"
I have looked extensively on the web for the fix for this issue, but can find none. Please note that I also have Oracle 8.1.7 client installed on this computer. I am running the Windows XP Professional OS. I have tried the %PATH% environment variable fix as suggested, however I still receive the error. Here is my %PATH% variable content:
C:\Program Files\Notes5;C:\Program Files\Reflection;C:\Program Files\Notes5;%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;%SystemRoot%\system32\nls;%SystemRoot%\system32\nls\ENGLISH;C:\Program Files\ORA95_2\BIN\;C:\Program Files\ORA95_2\OLAP\BIN;C:\Program Files\oracle\jre\1.1.7\bin;C:\oracle\ora81\bin
If anyone can help me, I would truly appreciate it. Thank you in advance.

hi philip,
developer 6.0 is not certified with windows xp. it will
never be certified. we are planning to certify developer 6i
in one of the next patchsets. please check the release notes
of the upcoming patchsets for details.
regards,
christian

Failure to configure windows updates. Reverting changes.....ordinal 282 could not be located in the dynamic link library

Hi,
My laptop (Lenovo Amd athlonII P360 dual-core processor) with OS windows 7 shutdown accidentally during updates. From then on I could log in to my system but it keeps popping up some error messages like....
tpsdsvc.exe-ordinal not found----ordinal 282 could not be located in dynamic link library iertutil.dll
concentr.exe--ordinal not found----ordinal 282 could not be located in dynamic link library iertutil.dll
AdobeARM.exe----ordinal not found----ordinal 282 could not be located in dynamic link library iertutil.dll
.Net EventWindow...MFManager.exe----ordinal not found----ordinal 282 could not be located in dynamic link library iertutil.dll
SLRuntime.exe---ordinal not found----ordinal 282 could not be located in dynamic link library iertutil.dll
IDVault.exe---ordinal not found----ordinal 282 could not be located in dynamic link library iertutil.dll
when I try to open IE browser..it pops up ieexplorer.exe------ordinal not found----ordinal 282 could not be located in dynamic link library iertutil.dll
My chrome browser stopped working...it opens but when I type any url...it just stays inactive...nothing happens
Even I'm unable to uninstall chrome through control panel. Nothing happens. I'm writing this through mozilla firefox. And even i cant update this browser. It says firefoxInstalle.exe---ordinal not found.
It always gives install update notification but when i try to install updates...it says failure to configure windows updates. reverting changes...
so far i tried sfc /scannow, restore points, safe mode, iertutil.dll file exists in c:/windows/system32...etc,.
I appreciate any solution on how to fix this problem and what is causing it?

Hi sravy,
Would you please let me know whether refer to Susan’s suggestion and check if it may be a hardware/harddrive
issue? Any find?
à
My laptop (Lenovo Amd athlonII P360 dual-core processor) with OS windows 7 shutdown accidentally during updates.
Did you find any dump file after the Windows 7 crashed? If find dump file, please refer to following KB and
check if can help you to analyze the dump file.
How to read the small memory dump file that is created by
Windows if a crash occurs
In addition, as Susan said, this forum is for Small Business Server. Based on your description, your problem
was just occurred in Windows 7 OS. I suggest that you would post your question in
Windows 7 Forum. I believe we will get a better assistance there.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu

Getting error: "The ordinal 449179364 could not be located in the dynamic link library WINMM.dll"

So when I start rendering a video, I get the message:
"The ordinal 449179364 could not be located in the dynamic link library WINMM.dll."
This is followed by a "transcoder error" message, and then an application crash. I looked for WINMM.dll, and found it here:
C:\Windows\winsxs\x86_microsoft-windows-audio-mmecore-base_31bf3856ad364e35_6.1.7600.16385 _none_b5b6125db303b0f8
Has anyone encountered this before, or found a solution?
Many thanks.

When sharing burn the project to a Folder rather than Disk. Does this complete? If so use something like ImgBurn to write your DVD from that folder.
What brand of disk are you using (ImgBurn can tell you)?
You seem to have covered many of the basics, but here is my usual list (I don't recall seeing you mention your graphic/sound drivers). It will be handy to see the Gspot analysis.
Some basics:
Install all Windows Updates.
Install latest version of Apple QuickTime (v7.6.7 at time of writing). Even if you don't use QuickTime, PRE relies heavily on it.
Install most recent graphics and sound drivers from the manufacturers web sites.
Run Disk Cleanup.
Run Defragmenter.
Temporarily disable any anti-virus realtime scanning.
Use the GSpot Codec Information Utility to analyse the file and post screen image.
Post back here with the necessary information described here: Got a Problem? How to Get Started
Cheers,
Neale
Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children

The ordinal 282 could not be located in the dynamic link lirary IERTUTIL.DLL

Hi all
I've installed the latest Updates on my SBS 2011 machine yesterday.
And now I get the "The ordinal 282 could not be located in the dynamic link library IERTUTIL.DLL" error when I try to start the IE.
Any idea?
Best regards, Chris

Hi Chris,
Would you please let me know the version information of IE? Did you install any update for the IE? Please navigate
to C:\Windows\System32 and check if IERTUTIL.DLL file exists?
On current situation, please run
sfc /scannow command to scan all protected system files. Any find?
If any update, please feel free to let us know.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu

The ordinal 303 could not be located in the dynamic link library iertutil.dll

As discussed in
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-performance/getting-error-using-rdc-the-ordinal-303-could-not/86d4479e-3152-4052-a959-1f86fe608774we are experiencing an issue with patch 2956283. After rebooting, our users can no longer
use IE and receive the error "The ordinal 303 could not be located in the dynamic link library iertutil.dll". I have seen this on several machines and it may involve Lync. The title of the error is "Microsoft Lync: communicator.exe
- Ordinal Not Fount". After removing 2956283 everything starts working again. Any fix for this? It appears to be pretty wide spread based on the posts in the previously mentioned forum.

Hi Frank,
Why did you install that package for your system? Did you encounter the issue in the article below?
Internet Explorer 11 crashes when you turn on or turn off Enterprise Mode in the Tools menu
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2956283
If no, please uninstall it.
If yes, check the following settings:
1. Press WIN+R to open the Run window, type
SystemPropertiesAdvanced and press Enter.
2. Click the environment variables... button.
3. Find the path variable and check if c:\windows\system32 (or
%SystemRoot%\system32) is present between all the paths.
If not, add it at the end of the entire string (preceded by a semi colon) and click Always ok.
4. Check if you have got IERTUTIL.DLL in c:\windows\system32.
Karen Hu
TechNet Community Support

The ordinal 139 could not be located in the dynamic link library iertutil.dll

I am getting this error while launching IE on my computer:
The ordinal 139 could not be located in the dynamic link library iertutil.dll
I have IE 11 installed on windows7 32 bit.

Hi Bansal,
When does this error start to occur? Check Event Viewer and see if we could find any other messages.
Take a try with the SFC command:
Use the System File Checker tool to repair missing or corrupted system files
Further, try the following if SFC won't help:
How to repair or reinstall Internet Explorer in Windows
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Job co-ordinator cjq0 process not spawning job slave processes ( j0XX )

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for