JPG - Export Settings to XMP?
When editing JPGs in ACR the adjustments are embedded and can be viewed in the EXIF Header (lines beginning with "crs"). But is there a way to export an XMP file from the JPG?
I see in the ACR option to "Export Settings to XMP" when opening a JPG, yet I cannot see where a file (if any) has been saved.
Does "Export Settings to XMP" create an xmp file somewhere when using ACR "Export Settings to XMP" with a JPG?
Thanks,
Russell
I just came across a workaround by searching this forum:
I can save a JPG as a DNG and then lock it. ACR adjustments are then saved as an XMP. That would work for my needs.
But my 1st question remains as to whether it can be done with a JPG. Locking a JPG does not work, an EXP file is not created and ACR refuses to save any edits on a Locked JPG.
Russell
Similar Messages
-
JPG export text as outlines?
hi guys,
I try to export an Illustrator file as JPG and CMYK and it will always results as and outline text without fill.
original file
http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1EQLksieEsVQdt7A2dJGcvWGJYuTo0
exported file
http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1aIZxr8BKZbyN2PTCmTAXEnlhS8YQ
Here are my export settings,
http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1hkuyAgB1eRGUiuDToD6m9w3HFKdbD
i changed them to try a diferent output but nothing will modify.
Finally i saved the file as PDF and then exported as JPG but the resolution is not very good besides i would like to be able to export directly from AI where i have more control settings.
Any ideas how could i solve this?
Thanks!I just checked the Appereance panel and even the text look like filled with white it didn't appeared right in the panel. I filled with it from the panel and now problem solved.
Thanks! -
Extremely large jpg exported files - help!
I was previously loving LR3 - used the trial for a month, decided to buy it - had really no problems. The big issue for me is now the jpg export file sizes that are being created. I run all my photos through the develop module to adjust the basics as well as draw in masks, and previously I had no trouble exporting the files as jpg, with the limit of size at 600kb and resized to 960x640 (original photos from 5Dmk2 RAW).
Then I bought the license. From then on it seems that now whenever I do the same exact export it doesn't work! I also used to use the output quality slider and set that at 100% and would get around the same file sizes, but now I'm getting files 2-3x the size of the previous exports. All of the photos have minimal metadata (10 keywords or so, that's it) and the same metadata was present in the exports in the trial version.
Playing around with more export parameters and reading around on this forum led me to try and minimize exif data - this didn't even work - files could not meet the requirements or they still ended up 2-3x the size they used to be.
The interesting part is that when I would delete all development history and set the file back to the original pre-edited RAW and export there would be no problems!
Could it be possible that LR is adding the development data into the metadata that it is attaching to the photo??
This has completely shut down my photo workflow and really is making me regret buying this otherwise wonderful tool.What I can see in the image is that it contains about (uncompressed) 750KB of XMP data, the major part of it relating to some "PaintCorrection" as follows:
PaintCorrectionWhat : Correction
PaintCorrectionAmount : 1.000000
PaintCorrectionActive : true
PaintCorrectionExposure : 0.439246
PaintCorrectionSaturation : 0.000000
PaintCorrectionContrast : 0.000000
PaintCorrectionClarity : 0.457077
PaintCorrectionSharpness : 0.000000
PaintCorrectionBrightness : 0.361949
PaintCorrectionHue : 240.000000
PaintCorrectionSaturation : 0.000000
PaintCorrectionMaskWhat : Mask/Paint
PaintCorrectionMaskValue : 0.689655
PaintCorrectionMaskRadius : 0.005442
PaintCorrectionMaskFlow : 0.000000
PaintCorrectionMaskCenterWeight : 0.843964
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689505 0.619480
PaintCorrectionMaskWhat : Mask/Paint
PaintCorrectionMaskValue : 0.689655
PaintCorrectionMaskRadius : 0.005444
PaintCorrectionMaskFlow : 0.000000
PaintCorrectionMaskCenterWeight : 0.843964
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689871 0.605390
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005443
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.0813
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689749 0.607832
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1519
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689626 0.610275
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1700
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689590 0.612722
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005442
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1759
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689635 0.615026
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005443
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1742
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689530 0.612581
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1726
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689425 0.610137
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005444
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1709
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689320 0.607692
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1692
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689214 0.605248
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005445
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1678
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689104 0.602803
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1460
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.688982 0.602615
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005444
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1525
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689069 0.605061
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1569
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689090 0.607511
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005443
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1625
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689100 0.609960
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1652
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689195 0.612399
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1863
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.689113 0.610052
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005444
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1845
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.688940 0.607617
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1839
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.688743 0.605185
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005445
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1916
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.688549 0.602753
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1748
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.688555 0.604775
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : r 0.005444
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.1839
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : d 0.688622 0.607222
PaintCorrectionMaskDabs : f 0.2225
This data results from heavy use of the local adjustment brush. Choosing "Minimize Embedded Metadata" upon export really should solve this problem for you. Please try again specifying this option.
But then, by doing so, you lose any other metadata (keywords etc.) also. To have complete control on what metadata gets written into the JPEG upon export, you could use Jeffrey’s “Metadata Wrangler” Lightroom Plugin.
I noticed one strange thing within the XMP data in your JPEG:
The data seems to be formatted differently than what I see with JPEGs I export ("HasExtendedXMP"), which I don't know where it comes from.
For further investigation, would it be possible for you to upload the Raw file and the XMP file belonging to it to somewhere (e.g. www.yousendit.com) and post a link to it here?
Beat Gossweiler
Switzerland -
I have checked all my preferences but when I export a jpg
file from Freehand11 with an image I cannot improve the quality of
the export image now matter what dpi I choose. The rest of the
drawing is fine but the image looks pixellated. Can any body help
pleaseUncoDesign wrote:
> When I convert type to paths in Freehand 11, the type
quality diminishes in
> the jpg. If I do not convert the type to paths, the jpg
results in a nice
> crisp edge, even at 400%.
Hmm. Very odd. I'm seeing the same thing here. There must be
a bug in the
JPEG exporter. Regardless of the anti-aliasing setting, it
does no
anti-aliasing whatsoever of vector objects. I think it's
using the system's
anti-aliasing for live text, so that's why you see the
difference. I seldom
use JPEG export, so I don't know if it's always been this way
or if it's
recently broken. I can't find a preference file that saves
JPEG export
settings.
A workaround, but not a very handy one would be to first
Modify>'Convert to
Image' with desired anti-aliasing which will covert selection
to an embedded
TIFF image. Then export that image to JPEG. Work on a copy of
the FH page,
or remember to Undo to restore the FH objects before closing
the file.
Do you have Photoshop or some other raster image editor? If
you set up your
export preferences correctly, it's an easy matter to copy
from FH, paste as
pixels in Photoshop and save as JPEG.
Judy Arndt -
Best image EXPORT settings for best quality
What should i have my export settings at when exporting to a jump drive to give to clients for web and printing use???
When i see my images uploaded on Facebook for example, the qulity looks poor which worries me that when printing the quality will be poor as well. Am i missing something in the setting for exporting? What is the proper way to export for the best quality image? HELP!
My settings now under Aperture>Presets>Image Export:
JPG Original size
300 dpit_hall10 wrote:
The information provided was helpful, but did not completely answer my question...
Are there specific settings with-in Aperture I can set for exporting so that clients have the ability to print as wanted and post on the web as wanted whithout losing any major amount of photo quality?
No, not for one size fits all.
I do appreciate this may be a frustrating answer, but non-the-less, that's how it is.
t_hall10 wrote:
Should I be gving 2 folders of pictures, one for web use and one for printing use? If I were to do that, what should the exporting setting be set for both folders?
Maybe, it's your choice.
Let's go through the settings.
The only real quality setting is for JPG compression. 12 is virtually no (lossless) compression but gives huge file sizes which may breach a websites limits.
A 16MP images on quality 12 will be about 22MB. 11 brings it down to 8MB and 10 down to 7MB. You'd be very hard pressed to see the difference between a 12 and a 10. But if you want to feel you are giving the best quality without the extreme file size, go for 11.
The the vast majority of web sites, like facebook, will either resize uploaded images and/or re-compress them. They may also crop them to a different aspect ratio to fit their browser software.
Many report the best size for upload to facebook, for small images is 960 pixels on the long side. For large images it's 2048. For different websites it may be different. It is discussed on many photography sites and blogs. You will find some promoting the 960 / 2048, and others with their own preferences. Here's a good one which also shows you many ways FB will mess with the images:
http://havecamerawilltravel.com/photographer/images-photos-facebook-sizes-dimens ions-types
The safest colour space is sRGB (Mac profile: sRGB IEC61966-2.1) as it will more often be right than wrong. You should preview your images on screen with this profile to get a feel for how it will look and avoid unexpected colour shifts in your files. Ideally your screen should be calibrated so you know what you are giving them is accurate.
To understand the printing issue, try this exercise:
If you have a printer installed on your Mac, it probably also installed some printer profiles. In Aperture, look at one of your nicer vibrant images. From the view menu turn on 'Onscreen Proofing' and then from the 'Proofing Profile' sub menu, select one of your printer profiles and look at how the onscreen image changes. Repeat with each of the printing profiles and see how the image changes each time.
This is only a fraction of the colour shifts that will be occuring after you give your file to someone and they print it on their own uncalibrated system with their uncalibrated printer.
Many photographers don't offer full size images to their clients. They will usually give them smaller versions for their own use, which may include small size printing.
They will either do the main printing themself on their own calibrated printer, or work with a print shop, and may have installed calibrated profiles on their system for the shops printing equipment so they can use onscreen proofing to gauge what the pictures will look like when printed on that equipment.
But if you are just giving a file to someone, you lose all control of how they will print it. Even experienced photographers and computer users can struggle to make the prints match close to what they look like on screen.
Most often photos will appear too dark, or the colours look wrong, or it lacks sharpness. There are some settings on the export presets for gamma and blackpoint compensation. Gamma will brighten the image for when it's printing too dark, and blackpoint will try to stop the shadows turning black (within the chosen colour space). But as you don't know in advance whether the images are going to print too dark, or the shadows are turning black, you can't really set these for a one-size fits all scenario.
So there are not many settings to help you here.
You are actually moving into the realm of defining your product. You could, for example, ask the client which site they intend to publish the photos on, research that site and produce files optimized specifically for that site.
You also need to decide what size (resolution) files to give them for printing and whether you are happy giving away your full size images.
These choices will lead you to a number of a different files sizes as 'your product', all should be in sRGB colour space, and all with quality 10 or 11. For any client's who know how to make use of a wider clour space like Adobe RGB for printing, they will probably ask you up front to supply the print versions as such.
Next, for each size and usage, you now need to sharpen these images.
This is because sharpeing is best applied to images that have been resized to their intended output size and should be sharpened in accordance with how they will be viewed. Images displayed on computer screen generally need less sharpening than those that will be printed. Depening on the printer, the images may need some oversharpening in the file, in order to appear crisp and sharp in the print. As you won't be controlling the printing process you should probably avoid oversharpening. The bottom line is, if people are taking on the task of their own printing, they'll need to figure out what they are doing to get good results, or use a commercial printer.
Andy -
MPEG Stream Clip Export Settings
Happy New Year!
I've been working on a WWII documentary.
You guys turned me onto a really nifty piece of software which I use occasionally; MPEG Stream Clip
It's great - just wanna make sure I'm using the right export settings for re-importing a piece of film back into FCP.
I assumed it was best to export as a Quick Time File rather than a DV. Why? Because it seems the DV export puts compression on the clip. In 'Options' I also choose Apple DVCPRO-NTSC
Take a look;
http://www.locationstudio.net/Export-QT.jpg
http://www.locationstudio.net/100-Per-Cent.jpg
http://www.locationstudio.net/DV-DVCPRO-NTSC.jpg
http://www.locationstudio.net/DV.jpg
Thanx
Mike*just wanna make sure I'm using the right export settings for re-importing a piece of film back into FCP.*
If you're working in a DV NTSC timeline then you are doing it right. the Streamclip option for dv creates a dv stream which is not the same thing as a DV NTSC Quicktime Movie.
rh -
Premiere Pro CS4 "Export Settings" window does not show up.
Hello,
I've run into a new problem with Premiere Pro CS4. Basically, when I select "File > Export > Media" my Export Settings window doesn't show up. If I click on the Premiere window I hear the beeping sound and nothing happens, if I hit Enter the Export Data window pops up and then Media Encoder opens. So, it seems that my Export Settings window is still open but I can't see it and make the necessary setting changes. It does not appear to be minimized and I can not locate it on my desktop anywhere. This is really frustrating because I was able to see the Export Settings window just a few weeks ago when I was exporting my last project. I've tried changing my screen resolutions but that didnt reveal the Export Settings window.
Does anyone know what is going on here and, more importantly, how I can fix it? I am really stuck here and am working against a deadline. Any and all help is greatly appreciated!
-BenBen,
THANK YOU!!!! For two days I have been struggling with the exact same issue. And of course it was simple to fix, if I had just thought about it. Thank you for taking the time to post your experience. I had tried all sorts of stuff trying to get everything onto my #1 monitor, with desktop & workspace resets, resizing my display, etc. After reading and printing your post,
Hitting ALT+Space,
Down Arrow,
Enter,
and then pressing the left arrow and watching my Export window slide into view, I was laughing so hard, that I was tearing up. It would have been a month waiting for my second monitor to get repaired to get to see what was still being displayed on this ghost monitor. Each week, I video and edit our church's service and then post three versions (Windows Media Player, Ipod-MP4, MP3 Audio) of it to our web site. I would have been four weeks behind were it not for your post.
Again, a BIG Thank You!!!
Tony Salso
[email protected]
Cedar City, UT 84720
Tony—Professional Digital Pictures
--Videographer and Webmaster
Red Hills Southern Baptist Church
Serving Jesus in Southern Utah
[email protected]
www.redhillssbc.org -
How do I reduce the number of audio channels in the source or export settings?
I'. trying to export my finished edit through the "movie" setting but keep getting the message that the number of audio channels to create in the exported file must be equal to, or less than the number of channels in the source. Reduce the number of audio channels in the source. Reduce the number of audio channels in the export settings. I am at a loss as to what this means and how I proceed with it prior to putting it to DVD. Please advise.
JWooleyWhat is your source, sequence settings and export setting. Which version of PP?
Prefebly a screendump of the export settings box.
(e.g. trying to export a mono track to 5.1) -
Hello everybody
I use PR Pro 1.5 and I created a short video (a collection of .avi source files that lasts no longer than 4 mn) that I need to export in various formats :
WMP and RealMedia for the web, and then AVI, QT and MPEG1 for cdroms, Knowing that the video is meant to be seen by a large audience, and that the original avi files properties are as follows : 720*576, audio rate=1024 kbps, 16 bits, PCM and video image rate 25/s, 29200kbps.
I am really new to all the concepts regarding audio and video codecs, time frame, bit rate etc. so I am a bit at a loss with the export settings.
So far, for each of these formats, my guess would be as shown below :
RealMedia for the web : export / adobe media encoder
codec : "RM9 NTSC download "32"," 62", "128" or "256 "? I don’t know which to choose or why. And just because 256 seems familiar, this is what I would select.
a- for the “Band width” I’d pick up the “56 dial-up” settings because of the large audience it is aiming at, ..
b- as for the “band width rate” I can choose between “variable” (average or high quality) or “continuous”, I’d pick “variable (average) because of the diversity of the audience connectivity
c- and then I have to choose the rate values (default values go from 700 max to 200 average), and here I really have no idea,
d- Then I have two drop down menus (for video and audio), first for a voice codec : there aren’t any voice on my video, so I’d pick the lowest value = 5kbps, second for a music codec : there’s a mp3 soundtrack on my video (rate: 200kbps, 2(stereo) and 44KHz), so I’d go for the “176kbps stereo music” selection in the drop down list, but I keep wondering why not “176 kbps audio surrounding”, or maybe it could be a lower or a higher rate.
e- and then again, I have the same two drop down menus (but this time for video only). Basically for the voice codec I’d make the same selection as above for both the voice and music codec.
a-In the video panel, I can decide to change the dimensions of the images. Default is set to 320*340, but my original files are 720*576. So should I change the default settings to match the real dimension of the images ? If I do so, will that increase the weight of my video and as a consequence the duration of download for the internet users ? Maybe I shouldn’t consider this as it should be a streaming video, … then the weight doesn’t really matter, and I can go for the 720*576 resolution. Except I’ve read somewhere that most servers that host videos are not dedicated to streaming, so in the end, the weight does matter for most internet users wishing to watch a video. … Shouldn’t I on the contrary leave the default dimensions as they are ?
b- and the in the next drop down menu I have to choose the video compression : “Real Video 9” or “Real Video 8” or “Real Video G2”. So … So G2 rings a bell somehow related to servers specializing in streaming (maybe I am completely wrong here … sorry). So I’d pick up that one to ensure that my video will be streamed. Then as an afterthought, as the total length of my video lasts no longer than 4 mn, maybe I can afford any of the two other options in the drop down menu. But which one is best ?
Jeez, this is a lot ! I’ll come back later on with my other formats and check if anybody is brave enough to answer !
Thanks in advance anyway
T.dj paige ... thank you.
-
What are the best export settings to use...
Operating system: Vista SP1
Camera: Canon HF100 (1900x1080 HD quality 29.97fps) -- uses AVCHD compression which is H.264 I believe.
I'm able to watch my camera video files in Vista nicely. However, I'm having trouble with the watching the results of my edited and exported videos. Assuming I want the same quality and playability as the source video, what settings should I use in the export?
In the export settings window... I select:
Format: H.264
Preset: HDTV 1080p 29.97 High Quality
Source files have the extension: .m2ts
...I don't change the other values. Then I export. Now the result is an .mp4 file which does not play in Windows Media Player. It does play in Quicktime or iTunes however it plays jerkily... I would like to be able to play it as smoothly as the original source plays... And I'd like to be able to play it in windows media player just as the source can be played in media player. Media player seems to play the source more smoothly than does iTunes or Quicktime.
So what are the best export settings for me so that I can watch my edited HD video on my computer as easily as the source footage???
I've been able to edit and save the results of the edit using the crappy ImageMixer3 video editor that comes with the camera. The results are perfect and play in windows media fine. The files it exports the edited video as is the same as the soure... the file extension is .m2ts
So the problem is how to get Adobe to export the edited video to an .m2ts file or at least to a file type that plays as nicely in my system?See
Exporting to iPods, cell phones, PSPs and other mobile devices in the PPro Help for details.
Cheers
Eddie
PremiereProPedia
RSS feed)
- Over 350 frequently answered questions
- Over 300 free tutorials
- Maintained by editors like
you
Forum FAQ -
JPGs exported from Lightroom 5.6 will not open in other applications
Recently I have noticed that jpgs exported from Lightroom 5.6 can not be opened in Canon DPP 3.14 and can not be resized using Image Resizer plugin. Both of these I use frequently.
I have seen mention of this issue re other applications also. Does anyone know if there is a solution?
I am using Windows 8.1 64bit. 5D Mark iiThis was an issue with 5.5 (the placement of some of the internal headers of the jpgs was changed and some other applications, including DPP, could not open them), but was corrected in 5.6. I just checked on it by exporting a jpg and opening it with no problem in DPP 3.14.15, Windows 7 x64. Are your jpgs old ones from LR 5.5?
-
Quicktime crashes when I attempt to change export settings.
Everytime I attempt to change my export settings in Quicktime 7 Pro (File>Export>Options>Settings) Quicktime crashes. I can open the Options window and see what compression I am using etc but as soon as I click on Settings or Filter or Size the next window opens for less than a second and Quicktime crashes along with an annoying tone from Windows.
I have uninstalled and re-installed Quicktime and iTunes with no change. I have also done a complete reinstall of XP home edition including downloading all the security updates, Service Pack 2 etc and I get the same error. This is a new problem because I had been doing this with no trouble just a few weeks ago.
I have also run into some errors if I attempt to update Quicktime. The errors are different depending on the way I try to update.
Going to Edit>Quicktime Preferences>Update Tab>Update I get the following error.
An exception occured while trying to run "Shell32.dll, Control_RunDLL" C:\Program Files\Quicktime\QTSystem\Quicktime.cpl"" If I leave that error window (labelled Run.DLL) open I then get Run a DLL as an App has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. and it asks me to send an error report etc etc...
The other update error I get is if I go to Help>Update Existing Software I get
Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library
Buffer Overrun detected!
Program C:\Program Files\Quicktime\QuickTimePlayer.exe
A buffer overrun has been detected which has corrupted the program's internal state. The program cannot safely continue execution and must now be terminated.
I've never seen Quicktime act this buggy until recently. This occurs with 7.1. 7.1.3 and the newest 7.1.6.
Custom Windows XP
Running updates with the Apple Software Updater seems to work without any errors.Okay. I don't know if anyone's reading this thread anymore but there is a work-around. It is a conflict with Quicktime and Nvidia cards. If you go into your display properties then click settings and click advanced, then click Troubleshoot. Slide the hardware acceleration slider all the way to the left. Disabling this does fix it. I know Quicktime and Nvidia are being asked for a fix but in the meantime, this does work.
David -
Adobe Media Encoder CS4--Missing part of interface in Export Settings
Hi,
I have a Windows 7 operating system on a 32-bit dell computer. When I open Adobe Media Encoder
I click on the Add button. Then I go to Edit->Export Settings. I am missing some of the
options for instance: adding cue points, parameters, and filters. I think it has a problem with Windows 7, but I'm
not sure.
There should be more options.
I put in my installation disk, but it does not allow you to just reinstall this program.
Does anyone know why this is happening. It works on a computer running Windows XP.I cannot guarantee that it is not a software issue. Sometimes Matrox is an easy "target." However, with several other Matrox users having similar issues, it does seem that Matrox might be the common element.
One of the issues with troubleshooting Matrox issues with PrPro is that few of the normal responders here have Matrox. Many tried the cards, and most unplugged them for various reasons. Some, like me, have never used them. That kind of limits the responses here, unless a Matrox-user, who has addressed such issues successfully, drops by with some tips.
Good luck, and please update the thread, especially if you do get a "fix." Others will benefit, and I will learn something new!
Hunt -
Adobe Media Encoder will not allow me to export settings
I am trying to export the settings from Adobe Media Encoder 6 so a co-worker can use them to encode videos with the same settings I have. However, when I click on edit, export settings is greyed out. Does anyone know what can be done to fix this? If there is another way to pass on my settings I'm open to suggestions.
Thanks in advance for your help.Sorry, found it,
Didn't realise I could scroll down to find more options in
the Encoder Window -
Adobe Media Encoder Export Settings Window Dimensions Problem
Any help on this would be appreciated: I'm on a macbook pro, osx 10.6, using CS4 Web Premium. I used to have an external monitor hooked up which had much higher resolution, so when using Adobe Media Encoder I'd click the Settings button on a video to get the Export Settings window, then stretched the Export Settings window to be the size of my external monitor. Now, I'm just using my laptop, and the export settings window does not have the resize buttons at top left to adjust it back to the size of my laptop, and the bottom third of the export settings window is getting cut off so I can't see the cancel/ok buttons etc.
I've tried re-installing media encoder (via reinstalling flash using the CDs) to try to 'reset' the window sizes, didn't fix the problem.
If anyone knows of any other preferences or something I could delete to fix this, I'd be one thankful dude.Yes, I was getting the same response. It means Adobe is not using OS native windows (shame on them!).I just tried something with CS4 that worked, though. Try this:
Quit Media Encoder
Go to UserHomeDirectory > Library > Preferences > Adobe > Adobe Media Encoder > 4.0 and delete the files called 'AMEPrefs.xml' and 'AppPrefs.xml'.
Then restart Media Encoder. For me, this reset the window size and placement. I tried moving the Export Settings window down so half of it was off the bottom of the screen. Once I deleted these files and restarted, the window was smaller and repositioned.
If that doesn't work, try downloading the demo of this product:
http://irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/
It says that Adobe programs are "trouble" programs, that they probably won't resize, but they should at least move. If nothing else, maybe you can move the window to a negative y value (up) so that the resize handle is visible, then move it back down so the header bar is visible again...
Maybe you are looking for
-
AT&T iPhone 2GB DataPro Cap.. would I go over it? Do you?
I'm planning to get the iPhone 4 on AT&T soon, but am just hesitant about this 2GB limited cap. I currently have a T-Mobile Sidekick (3G), and only use about 70MB a month. However, I know with iPhones the data is used differently. I will be using Ins
-
InDesign PDF transparent images not printing right background color.
problem with exporting an InDesign Document to a PDF and printing. My transparent images are showing up with a darker background than what they are placed on. Know how to help?
-
Hierarchy in BW and showing the technical name
I have created a Hierarchy off 0COSTCENTER. I only want the technical names of the cost centers itself to show. All other node levels I do not want the technical name to show up. Can someone let me know if this is possible? Thanks much, Jason
-
Scripting Bridge for Color Management
Hi, I need a script that instruct Bridge to Switch to a color Preset. I have no problem using AS but Dictionary os Bridge don't have support to AS but only can invoke Javascript. Somebody has an example about how to set Bridge (and Sync automatically
-
Just got what I believe is a 6th gen Nano under the replacement program. I have songs stored on it and it has been sync'd. I have selected "manually manage music and videos" and the "enable disk use" is checked but grayed. When first plugged into my