July 2005 Security Patch

Does the following (from the patch installation README notes):
3) Set JDK_HOME to the JDK directory (JDK 1.3.1 or above)
For example, if you have JDK version 1.3.1 installed under /usr/local/packages/jdk directory, then set JDK_HOME to /usr/local/packages/jdk
mean that you have to have jdk 1.3.1 or higher installed to apply the July 2005 Security Patch???
TIA

This may not help... when you issue command as:
# which java
This will return java, from /usr/bin/java ---- and then when you say
# java -version --- this will pickup the default java version installed.
Instead of above , I suggest change to the directory where JDK 1.3.1 is installed and then issue command as
# cd bin
# ./java -version
If you are not sure where the JDK 1.3.1 is installed then query for the package as:
# pkginfo | grep SUNWj3
if the above command returns the result, then your system has JDK 1.3.1
and generally it will be under /usr ... If above command does not return any result then you have to install the JDK 1.3.1 or higher for completing your application of patch.
thanks
srinivas.

Similar Messages

July 2006 critical security patches released for corporate accounts

Hello,
Oracle had made a policy statement for 10gXE that it would not be releasing security patches for 10gXE. Today Oracle released the July 2006 critical security patches. See this page on Oracle website. These patches are only available to customers with a Metalink account.
Will there be corresponding new release of 10gXE to address the coverage in these updates?
Thank you.
Albert

According previos release of patches for 10g and analogue on XE - NO!

Install IE10 and required security patches with WSUS with only 1 or 2 reboots

We are planning to deploy IE 10 with WSUS. Currently, it takes 1 reboot to apply IE 10 and 2 subsequent reboots to apply all the identified security patches for IE 10 via WSUS. We are under close scrutiny to limit the number of times that computers
must be rebooted to apply patches so that we don't impede our business function.
Is there anyway to deploy IE 10 and all required IE 10 security patches with WSUS with only a single or 2 reboots? As I understand WSUS already "packages" or "layers" patches in a manner to limit the number of reboots and that
various patches must be installed only after pre-requisite patches are identified as installed.
We are rolling out to a couple thousand machines and want to make the business impact as little as possible.
Any help would be appreciated.

and 2 subsequent reboots to apply all the identified security patches for IE 10 via WSUS.
I find this unusual. Exactly how did you determine this to be the case. Which updates are you actually deploying to an IE10 environment?
My investigation identifies that the only two updates are applicable to an IE10 (on Windows 7) environment. They are MS14-011 (KB290920), released Feb 2014, and MS14-056 (KB2987107), released Oct 2014. Since these two updates *CAN* be installed
concurrently, at worst these two updates installed concurrently would only trigger one reboot -- assuming they trigger a reboot at all.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

Dot net Applilcations are not running after Microsoft Security patches in Sep and Nov 2014

My team did the microsoft security patches of Aug2014 and November2014 on 10 client machines (10 macines 2005) without a hitch. The Client machine (Windows 2005) accepted the patch, but all machines one of the applicaiton(VB6.0 and VB.net2005) is not able to
connect to the server.The event log was filled with SChannel errors indicating code 80 (internal_error), implying something that was deeply wrong with SChannel:
The following fatal alert was generated: 80. The internal error state is 1250.
and
The following fatal alert was generated: 80. The internal error state is 1051.
Has anyone else experienced this issue with this or another update, or have some tips as to how I might better diagnose the issue? Thank you.

Hi,
I have seen a few threads with the same error, please try to uninstall KB2992611 to see if the issue persists.
Best Regards,
Amy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]

Where is new security patch?

It's not in Software Update and I can't find it on Apple website ... but it's all over the IT news sites.
???

2006-03-12 20:29:12 +0000: Installed "Java 1.3.1 and 1.4.2 Release 2" (2.0)
2006-03-12 20:29:38 +0000: Installed "QuickTime" (7.0.4)
2006-03-12 20:29:41 +0000: Installed "AirPort Update 2005-001" (1.0)
2006-03-12 20:29:49 +0000: Installed "iPod Updater 2006-01-10" ( )
2006-03-12 20:31:48 +0000: Installed "Mac OS X Update Combined (PowerPC)" (10.4.5)
2006-03-16 20:54:40 +0000: Installed "J2SE 5.0 Release 3" (3.0)
2006-03-16 20:54:44 +0000: Installed "GarageBand Update" (3.0.1)
2006-03-16 20:56:07 +0000: Installed "Security Update 2006-002 (PowerPC)" (1.1)
2006-04-02 21:52:52 +0100: Installed "iPod Updater 2006-03-23" ( )
2006-04-03 21:51:35 +0100: Installed "Mac OS X Update (PowerPC)" (10.4.6)
2006-04-26 22:07:29 +0100: Installed "J2SE 5.0 Release 4" (4.0)
2006-04-26 22:08:18 +0100: Installed "GarageBand Update" (3.0.2)
2006-05-13 09:47:12 +0100: Installed "QuickTime" (7.1)
2006-05-13 09:47:40 +0100: Installed "Security Update 2006-003 (PowerPC)" (1.0)
2006-05-20 11:11:24 +0100: Installed "iDVD Update" (6.0.2)
2006-05-20 11:13:03 +0100: Installed "iWeb Update" (1.1)
2006-05-20 15:53:31 +0100: Installed "iPhoto Update" (6.0.3)
2006-05-20 15:53:46 +0100: Installed "iMovie HD Update" (6.0.2)
2006-06-06 10:28:35 +0100: Installed "QuickTime" (7.1.1)
2006-06-16 17:11:16 +0100: Installed "iWeb Update" (1.1.1)
2006-06-22 16:09:29 +0100: Installed "iPhoto Update" (6.0.4)
2006-07-02 22:39:48 +0100: Installed "QuickTime" (7.1.2)
2006-07-02 22:39:55 +0100: Installed "iPod Updater 2006-06-28" ( )
2006-07-03 10:19:11 +0100: Installed "iTunes" (6.0.5)
2006-07-03 10:20:41 +0100: Installed "Mac OS X Update (PowerPC)" (10.4.7)
Here's a recent sample from my Software Update log - the last Security Update was in May.
Here are the links:
Security Update 2006-003
Security Update 2006-002.
Security Update 2006 -001
Security Update 2005-009
et cetra....
Other software updates also include security aspects such as patching hoe, where arbitary code can be executed i.e. in iChat/Bluetooth both of which made fairly big news in the blogs this year.
And here's the Security Update summary which covers all important updates.
I haven't seen any recent reports (last few days) and I regularly read several Mac/Computer blogs.
mrtotes
Message was edited by: mrtotes
After some deeper research I found this security report. It would seem 10.4.7 patched 5 security flaws. I would guess they don't exist in 10.3.9 or below.
iTunes 6.0.5 also patched a issue where arbitary code could be executed through an AAC file.
Nothing to worry about here... The news about it came out after the security patch.
Most of the hype will be from Apple bashers wanting to prove OS X isn't as good as it's made out (it's a darn sight better than Windoze in all most all respects) and Security companies (like Symantec) wanting Mac users to start spending out cash on Security Software. Personally I'll take a serious interest once a security announcement comes a long time before Apple patches it!!!!

Getting information on critical security patches

Hi,
I want to get a list of all available security patches for WebLogic server 8.1 sp 6 and weblogic server 9.2 MP 1. However, I could not find much information from the documentation. I can see that the Critical Patch Updates for October 2008 are available at
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpuoct2008.html#PIN
and I can find the ones from July, 2008 too.
However, where can I find notes on the earleir ones? is there any document that this all the available critical patches for a particular weblogic server version?
Thanks,
Bijula

The Known and Resolved issues section of the docs are sometimes helpful this type of information, but if you want more information that is up-to-date it is best to open a support case and request it.
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs92/issues/known_resolved.html

Webi scheduling error in BO 4.0 SP04 after security patch updates in windows server 2008 R2

We are getting below error in BO 4.0 SP04 Web Intelligence report scheduling after security patch updates in windows server 2008 R2
while trying to invoke the method com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server.IServer.getServerContext() of an object returned from com.businessobjects.rebean.wi.impl.services.DocumentInstanceManagementServiceImpl.getServer(com.businessobjects.sdk.core.context.IContext, com.businessobjects.rebean.wi.model.engine.IDocumentInstance)
We have reverted back security patch but still giving above scheduling problem in BO 4.0 SP04 WebI and we can view and refresh report.
Is there any way to fix the scheduling problem in BO 4.0 SP04 WebI?

HI,
Check SAP notes if they will help you.
1934855 - Scheduled Web Intelligence documents fail with com.businessobjects.sdk.core.server Error
1916443 - Scheduling Web Intellignce reports which are having long names to excel and pdf fails.
1792921 - Unable to schedule Webi documents in Excel or PDF format

After security patch 03/04/2014 OSX 10.7.5, first one, then a second, external backup drive no longer recognized. Diagnostics for the FireWire one displays brand name of unit, but Time Machine and its own app don't see it. Where do I start?

Yesterday I installed the security patch, OSX 10.7.5 to my IMac that is about 2 years old.
Today my Seagate BackupPlus for Mac will power on but is not recognized. It does not show up as a device, Time Machine says the latest backup was DELAYED, last successful at 03/04/2014 9:35 PM (yesterday) and next backup would begin when the disk was connected. An error message I did not save said basically the drive was not recognized.   I did all drive's troubleshooting steps, including installing a newer version of their app. I tried swapping USB for FireWire, changing electrical outlets, etc.
It seems a bit coincidental to have 2 drives "fail" simultaneously. Is anyone else having this issue after this security patch? What would be the approach from the Mac side? TIA for any assistance.
Please see below regarding the second drive. Is this a red herring, or does it help pinpoint where the failure might lie?
I also have a Seagate GoFlex that WAS recognized until I did the troubleshooting on the other drive. When I put it back on after testing the other drive with FireWire, it now is no longer recognized.
Diagnostics says this about that:
FireWire Bus:
Maximum Speed:          Up to 800 Mb/sec
GoFlex Mac:
Manufacturer:          Seagate
Model:          0x6090
GUID:          0x2037600121908F
Maximum Speed:          Up to 800 Mb/sec
Connection Speed:          Up to 800 Mb/sec
Sub-units:
GoFlex Mac Unit:
Unit Software Version:          0x10483
Unit Spec ID:          0x609E
Firmware Revision:          0x111
Sub-units:
GoFlex Mac SBP-LUN:
Thirdly, in after one of the testing/reboot loops, the HP WiFi printer was no longer recognized, but after a few more it came back.

I have a similar problem.
Moreover, as my external drive is split in 2 for (a) regular storage // (b) time machine usage, I can see in the Finder that I can connect to the (a) regular storage part and use it normally (image 1).
And I cannot connect to the backup part in Finder , nor see it in Disk Utility, nor use it in Time Machine (although it's listed in the Time Machine preferences, image 2), as it does not connect (image 3).
Can somebody help?

Hi, I don't know how to find a specific security patch to apply to my Oracle database version to fix a vulnerability

Hi, I don't know how to find a specific security patch to apply to my Oracle database version 11.2.0.2.0 (on windows server 2003 32 bits) to fix the following vulnerability:
Risk: High
Application: oracle_tnslsnr
Port: 1521
Protocol: tcp
Synopsis:
It is possible to register with a remote Oracle TNS listener.
Description:
The remote Oracle TNS listener allows service registration from a remote host. An attacker can exploit this issue to divert data from a
legitimate database server or client to an attacker-specified system.
Successful exploits will allow the attacker to manipulate database instances, potentially facilitating man-in-the-middle, sessionhijacking,
or denial of service attacks on a legitimate database server.
Solution:
Apply the work-around in Oracle's advisory.
Thank you for your help

2835604 wrote:
Hi, I don't know how to find a specific security patch to apply to my Oracle database version 11.2.0.2.0 (on windows server 2003 32 bits) to fix the following vulnerability:
Risk: High
Application: oracle_tnslsnr
Port: 1521
Protocol: tcp
Synopsis:
It is possible to register with a remote Oracle TNS listener.
Description:
The remote Oracle TNS listener allows service registration from a remote host. An attacker can exploit this issue to divert data from a
legitimate database server or client to an attacker-specified system.
Successful exploits will allow the attacker to manipulate database instances, potentially facilitating man-in-the-middle, sessionhijacking,
or denial of service attacks on a legitimate database server.
Solution:
Apply the work-around in Oracle's advisory.
Thank you for your help
that sounds like the "tns poison" vulnerability. CVE 2012-1675 - Oracle Security Alert CVE-2012-1675
See MOS note 134083.1 and 1453883.1

Oracle Security Patch Error while applying --The filename, directory name,

Hello,
I am running into strange error while applying Oracle Security Patch 68 by using Opatch.
Supposedly, All the environment variables are set properly.
ACTIVE_STATE_PERL=true
DBMS_TYPE=ORA
dbs_ora_tnsname=YBQ
JAVA_HOME=C:\jdk1.3.1_10
OPATCH_DEBUG=TRUE
ORACLE_HOME=E:\oracle\ora92
ORACLE_SID=YBQ
Path=E:\oracle\OPatch;C:\jdk1.3.1_10\bin;E:\oracle\Perl\bin;E:\oracle\ora92\jre\1.4.2\bin\client;E:\oracle\ora92\jre\1.4.2\bin;E:\oracle\ora92\bin;C:\Program Files\Oracle\jre\1.3.1\bin;C:\Program Files\Oracle\jre\1.1.8\bin;C:\Program Files\Common Files\VERITAS Shared;\NetBackup\bin;C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\Tools\;C:\Program Files\Support Tools\;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;E:\usr\sap\YBQ\SYS\exe\run
Installed Active Perl. latest version
downloaded Opatch 1.0.0.50
and the patch number 3738339
I went to that directory and run the command :
perl opatch.pl apply
It started of well.
OPatch version is: 1.0.0.0.50
Using ORACLE_HOME/oui to look up oui libs...
Oracle Home = E:\oracle\ora92
Location of Oracle Inventory = E:\oracle\ora92\inventory
Oracle Universal Installer shared library = E:\oracle\ora92\oui\lib\win32\oraInstaller.dll
Path to Java = "E:\oracle\ora92\jre\1.4.2\bin\java.exe"
Location of Oracle Inventory Pointer = N/A
Location of Oracle Universal Installer components = E:\oracle\ora92\oui
Required Jar File under Oracle Universal Installer = jlib\OraInstaller.jar
find under OH/oui/jlib
found OraInstaller.jar
Checking if this is a RAC system...
Accessing inventory... This may take up to 300 seconds.
(retry 10 times, delay 30 seconds each time)
System Command: ""E:\oracle\ora92\jre\1.4.2\bin\java.exe" -Dopatch.retry=10 -Dopatch.delay=30 -DTRACING.ENABLED=TRUE -DTRACING.LEVEL=2 -Dopatch.debug=true -classpath "E:\oracle\ora92\oui\jlib\OraInstaller.jar;E:\oracle\ora92\oui\jlib\srvm.jar;jlib\opatch.jar;E:\oracle\ora92\oui\jlib\xmlparserv2.jar;E:\oracle\ora92\oui\jlib\share.jar;.:E:\oracle\ora92\jlib\srvm.jar" opatch/O2O "e:\oracle\ora92" "E:\oracle\ora92\oui" opatch.pl 1.0.0.0.50"
Result:
----- DEBUG is ON -------
oracle.installer.startup_location will be set to E:\oracle\ora92\oui
oracle.installer.oui_loc will be set to E:\oracle\ora92\oui
oracle.installer.scratchPath will be set to /tmp
opatch.local_node_only is OFF
retryOption is ON: 10
delayOption is ON: 30
Few more stuff here .. not pasting the entire contents
System Command: ""E:\oracle\ora92\jre\1.4.2\bin\java.exe" -Dopatch.retry=10 -Dopatch.delay=30 -DTRACING.ENABLED=TRUE -DTRACING.LEVEL=2 -Dopatch.debug=true -classpath "E:\oracle\ora92\oui\jlib\OraInstaller.jar;E:\oracle\ora92\oui\jlib\srvm.jar;jlib\opatch.jar;E:\oracle\ora92\oui\jlib\xmlparserv2.jar;E:\oracle\ora92\oui\jlib\share.jar;." opatch/CheckConflict "E:\oracle\ora92\oui" "e:\oracle\ora92" opatch.pl 1.0.0.0.50 3738339 "3741539 3528282 3516951 3622875 3668572 3371796 3239873 3356103 3543125 3666502 2800494 2824035 2964252 3617042 3320622 3571233 3253770 3492040 3566469 3354470 3625370 3583686 3150750 3617519 3635177 3597640 3749394 3542588 3698501 2954891 2918138 3559212 3518909 3412818 3430832 3172282 3358490 3637624 3458446 3179637 2810394 3668224 3609791 3566813 3475932 2338704 3412136 3388633 3540576 3571226 3575743 2690205 3240280 3509265 3177513 3575747 3811906 3554319 3752406 3323435 " E:\3738339\etc\config\actions"
Result:
opatch.pl version: 1.0.0.0.50
Copyright (c) 2001-2004 Oracle Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect.
Error in executing Java program to check conflict
ERROR: OPatch failed during pre-reqs check.
Now there is no problem with executing the last java program in the same prompt by removing the first and the last double quote "
Please advise.
Thanks in advance.

hi somnath,
this is the portal content management forum. for your database question please use the database forums:
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/index.jsp?cat=18
thanks,
christian

Your system is missing a critical Windows security patch (MS12-020) required to gain access to this system

Hi,
I am trying to install VPN Client from my client site. While installing i am facing the below error.
Your system is missing a critical Windows security patch (MS12-020) required to gain access to this system. Use the link below for more information on installation, or open Windows Update and install all available critical updates. When you're finished updating
your system, log out and try again. If you're still having problems, contact your system administrator.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2621440
I went through all the related sites but still i did not find any solution. Under Windows installed updates i could see the security update for Microsoft windows (KB2621440). If its already exist why it is not taking this security patch?
Kindly guide.
Best Regards,
Yadav Kankanwadi

Hi,
Based on Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-020, this security update resolves two privately reported vulnerabilities:
KB2621440 and KB2667402.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/security/bulletin/ms12-020
Thanks!
Andy Altmann
TechNet Community Support

After I installed the recent Apple security patch, I can no longer save PDFs when using Safari. And Firefox no longer can open website PDFs. Any suggestions?

After I installed the recent Apple security patch, I can no longer save PDFs when using Safari. And Firefox no longer can open website PDFs. Any suggestions?

Dansyacht wrote:
If the previous Safari suggestion doesn't work try the following:
In Finder, go to Macintosh HD/Library/Internet Plug-ins and move AdobePDFViewerNPAPI.plugin to the Disabled Plug-ins Folder. Restart Safari. If this works you may just want to delete that FUBAR plug-in.
Thanks. This was the solution for me.
Message was edited by: tvdowntown

I'm using my iPad with iOS v 6.1.3- is there a security patch for the SSL/TLS vulnerability for this, or do I have to go to 7.0.6?

I'm using my iPad with iOS 6.1.3. Is there a security patch for this version, or do I have to update to iOS 7.0.6?

There is an update for iOS 6... v6.1.6. But it is only available to iPhone 3GS and iPod touch 4th gen users. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6146?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
For iPad, the highest supported os for iOS 6 is v6.1.3. If you want to get the security patch, you'll have to go to iOS 7.0.6.
Hope this answers your question.
~Joe

Critical security patches on Solaris 9

Hi.
My director asked me to install critical security patches on our solaris 9 servers. Previously I downloaded that 9_recommended patch from sunsolve.com and install the whole patch clusters. My question is how can I ONLY get all those patches which are critical to the security issue? The recommended patch cluster includes a lot patches which are not relevant to security.
BTW, does anybody know some autopatching tools?
Thank you very much!

PatchPro is probably what you want. It should be available at
http://sunsolve.sun.com
-- richard

In deadlock after every release of security patch

After a security patch release is available the user has to visit the download page which
can "speak" only Flash using the vulnerable installation of Flash Player.
That means the user must expose own system to attacks in order to download the patched version.
What bad concept. Where is the Adobe specialist responcible for the concept?
Please do not claim one can trust the Adobe server and download page.
Nowadays, there is no one server nor url trustful.
Certificate issuers are not trustfull - see accidents from few last months.
So, the more the servers nor internet sides can be trustfull.
And the link to offline installer does not work due to disabled flash player
or for any other reason. See http://kb2.adobe.com/de/cps/191/tn_19166.html
and the url placed there
Flash Player 10 Plugin (Alle anderen Windows-Browser, wie etwa Firefox oder Google Chrome)
User does not decide to enable vulnerable flash installation and is not able to update
to the patched one. It is a dead-lock.

Under Adobe Forums: Forum: Flash Player ?
It is defenitely too deep in Adobe's world.
Official download page is not a forum page.
Most of normal and PC non-freaks willl look there for downloads/updates.
Link to full installer should be placed on official download page.
Additionally, this page should not use Flash Player.
Just to avoid a dead-lock when an update includes security patches.
Additionally, as JackMcNac states it above the links to off-line
installers and to be find somewhere in the Flash Online Support
do not always work - it can't be.

July 2005 Security Patch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for