Jumpstart installation of flar image fails

Guru's,
During night time I make a flar image of the local disk of a SF480. I also created a jumstart server (Solaris 10 03/05) so I would be able to restore this image on the 480. So far not very special, I think. Now comes the difficult part: the flar image of the 480 is an image of a mirrored disk (svm). For Solaris 9 I used a postinstall script to fix the svm files like mddb.tab, vfstab etc. to mount the original slices. After the installation of a Solaris 9 image everything was ok. When I try to do the same trick on Solaris 10 the whole procedure goes fine until the boot process reports:
Hostname: rusland
ERROR: svc:/system/filesystem/root:default failed to mount /usr (see 'svcs -x'
for details)
[ system/filesystem/root:default failed fatally (see 'svcs -x' for details) ]
Requesting System Maintenance Mode
(See /lib/svc/share/README for more information.)
Console login service(s) cannot run
Root password for system maintenance (control-d to bypass):
I did check the slice with fsck from a cdrom but there were no errors.
Even when I try to boot with ok> boot -m milestone=none the console services don't start. Does anybody have an idea what the problem is? I think I'm pretty close but I'm probably missing a (hopefully small) part. Thanks in advance.

Guru's,
During night time I make a flar image of the local disk of a SF480. I also created a jumstart server (Solaris 10 03/05) so I would be able to restore this image on the 480. So far not very special, I think. Now comes the difficult part: the flar image of the 480 is an image of a mirrored disk (svm). For Solaris 9 I used a postinstall script to fix the svm files like mddb.tab, vfstab etc. to mount the original slices. After the installation of a Solaris 9 image everything was ok. When I try to do the same trick on Solaris 10 the whole procedure goes fine until the boot process reports:
Hostname: rusland
ERROR: svc:/system/filesystem/root:default failed to mount /usr (see 'svcs -x'
for details)
[ system/filesystem/root:default failed fatally (see 'svcs -x' for details) ]
Requesting System Maintenance Mode
(See /lib/svc/share/README for more information.)
Console login service(s) cannot run
Root password for system maintenance (control-d to bypass):
I did check the slice with fsck from a cdrom but there were no errors.
Even when I try to boot with ok> boot -m milestone=none the console services don't start. Does anybody have an idea what the problem is? I think I'm pretty close but I'm probably missing a (hopefully small) part. Thanks in advance.

Similar Messages

  • 'flash_reboot_processing' file error while Sol9/05 jumpstart installation

    I do Solaris 9/05 jumpstart installation from flash image. I have the following error:
    Extracted 621.00 MB ( 99% of 622.37 MB archive)
    Extracted 622.00 MB ( 99% of 622.37 MB archive)
    Extracted 622.37 MB (100% of 622.37 MB archive)
    Extraction complete
    Postdeployment processing
    No local customization defined
    cp: cannot create /a/etc/init.d/flash_reboot_processing: No such file or directory
    Can not set reboot customization scripts
    ERROR: Error while processing system postdeployment script
    ERROR: Postdeployment processing failure
    ERROR: Flash installation failed
    So when I reboot the server it says:
    Boot device: /pci@9,600000/SUNW,qlc@2/fp@0,0/disk@w500000e0112b7631,0:b File and args:
    Boot load failed.
    The file just loaded does not appear to be executable.
    I guess maybe it is connected with
    http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3804/6mjcffkoi?a=view
    on some way ..
    Please help.

    I get the same error message after Solaris10 6/06 WAN Boot installation.
    Extraction complete
    Postdeployment processing
    No local customization defined
    cp: cannot create /a/etc/init.d/flash_reboot_processing: No such file or directory
    Can not set reboot customization scripts
    ERROR: Error while processing system postdeployment script
    ERROR: Postdeployment processing failure
    ERROR: Flash installation failed
    Has anyone successfully completed a Solaris 10 6/06 WAN boot installation?
    I have found that most of the Solaris 10 WAN Boot Install documentation has been incorrect on out of date. I have had to modify and rebuild my configuration files and webserver many times after each new error encountered. Going on two weeks that I have been at this. This is crazy...

  • Solaris 10 .flar image - ready-to-use?

    Hello, All!
    I'm looking for Solaris 10 (freferrably 10/08) .flar image for installation into zone (as described here: http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/submitted/branded_zones_flash.jsp), just the same as it does exist for Solaris 8 and 9 (here: http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/containers/getit.jsp)
    And yes, I do know how to create flar image of existing system - http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-5241/flash-53?l=en&a=view -- I'm just interested in "clean", not so used Solaris 10 system.
    Thanks,
    Olga.

    Hi Sid,I have tried the installation using same link.I was successful in creating the zone configuration but unable to install the zone using flarimage
    bash-3.00# zoneadm -z GNM086 install -p -a /flairimage/gnm086
    ERROR: The Solaris 10 Containers right-to-use package has not been installed
    rm: Unable to remove directory /zones/gnm086: Device busy
    zoneadm: zone 'GNM086': '/usr/bin/rm -rf' failed with exit code 2.
    zoneadm: could not remove new zonepath: Empty document
    bash-3.00#
    Plz update me ,what can be done in this case.........
    Thanks in Advance........

  • Image Capture Boot Image Fails with 0xc000000f

    I am trying to capture a Windows 8.1 Enterprise (with Update) x64 installation using WDS, but the Capture Image fails to load. I used the boot.wim from the Windows Server 2012 R2 (with Update) ISO to create a boot image in WDS and then a capture image from
    it. After I press F12 and the progress bar finishes the following message appears:
    This only happens when I boot the capture image - the original boot image that I imported in WDS boots normally. I also tried with the Windows 8.1 (with Update) boot.wim, but the issue reoccurs. This is a Hyper-V VM on Windows Server
    2012. Is this a problem with the recent update?

    Hi,
    We’re currently experiencing exactly the same issue. Also a fully-updated Server 2012R2 (with the recent KB2919355 update) machine.
    So far, I found two other posts with exactly the same issue:
    1) http://wp.secretnest.info/?p=1474
    2)
    http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/472581-wds-capture-image-winload-exe-corrupt-or-missing
    According to these posts it seems like the issue occurs after the first time a capture image based upon a Windows 8.1 or Server2012R2 boot.wim is created.
    What I’ve tried so far is removing the server role, deleting the WDS store, rebooting the server and start over with a Windows 7 boot.wim. The normal boot.wim starts ok, but the created capture image doesn’t.
    So the process of creating the capture boot image did ‘something’ in a way the new boot.wim differences from the old boot.wim. To find out what, I first mounted the new .wim file to see if winload.exe is actually there – it is both in
    system32 as well as systen32\boot. So my second guess was that the Windows Boot Manager cannot find the windows loader, because of an incorrect declaration of disks in the BCD store.
    I used BCDEDIT to show the differences between the working and non-working boot images:
    Windows Boot Loader
    identifier {1d214c07-6892-401c-a762-04647ad38560}
    device ramdisk=[boot]\Boot\x64\Images\boot.wim,{b321afc0-8a23-4
    961-85dd-a10f3c46473f}
    description Windows 7 Boot Image
    osdevice ramdisk=[boot]\Boot\x64\Images\boot.wim,{68d9e51c-a129-4
    ee1-9725-2ab00a957daf}
    systemroot \WINDOWS
    detecthal Yes
    winpe Yes
    Device options
    identifier {b321afc0-8a23-4961-85dd-a10f3c46473f}
    inherit {68d9e51c-a129-4ee1-9725-2ab00a957daf}
    ramdiskmcenabled No
    ramdiskmctftpfallback Yes
    -- Second - Non Working disk --
    Windows Boot Loader
    identifier {872352a0-0ad9-46f6-8612-1aed71ea8534}
    device ramdisk=[boot]\Boot\x64\Images\boot-win7-capture.wim,{7a
    b86a3a-3651-4f50-a748-34f3e784158c}
    description Windows 7 Capture
    osdevice ramdisk=[boot]\Boot\x64\Images\boot-win7-capture.wim,{68
    d9e51c-a129-4ee1-9725-2ab00a957daf}
    systemroot \WINDOWS
    detecthal Yes
    winpe Yes
    Device options
    identifier {7ab86a3a-3651-4f50-a748-34f3e784158c}
    inherit {68d9e51c-a129-4ee1-9725-2ab00a957daf}
    ramdiskmcenabled No
    ramdiskmctftpfallback Yes
    So the ID for the osdevice is the same, and only the device is different, but mentioned correctly under Device options (as far as my knowledge goes in this subject). I hope there will be a solution anytime soon.

  • Solaris 10 U6 jumpstart installation always goes into interactive mode desp

    While doing the Solaris 10 U6 jumpstart installation, it is going into interactive mode for netmask.
    This is the sysidcfg file configuration being used :
    bash-3.00# cat /export/home/iserver/jumpstart/donau1/sysidcfg
    system_locale=en_US
    name_service=none
    network_interface=ce2
    {hostname=donau1 netmask=255.255.252.0 ip_address=10.50.57.24 protocol_ipv6=no default_route=10.50.56.1}
    security_policy=none
    terminal=vt100
    timezone="MET"
    timeserver=10.50.57.214
    nfs4_domain=dynamic
    root_password=5YcgZqC0krYjo
    bash-3.00#
    Here the network interface specified is "ce2" and the netmask is as shown above. Still, we observe the problem all the times.
    and I have seen the following messages on the screen
    Attempting to configure interface ce3...
    Skipped interface ce3
    Attempting to configure interface ce2...
    Configured interface ce2
    ip_arp_done: init failed
    ifconfig: setifflags: SIOCSLIFFLAGS: ce2: Cannot assign requested address
    Attempting to configure interface ce1...
    Skipped interface ce1
    Attempting to configure interface ce0...
    Skipped interface ce0
    Reading ZFS config: done.
    Setting up Java. Please wait...
    Serial console, reverting to text install
    Beginning system identification...
    Searching for configuration file(s)...
    Using sysid configuration file 10.50.57.214:/export/home/iserver/jumpstart/donau1/sysidcfg
    Search complete.
    Discovering additional network configuration...
    Completing system identification...
    after this it is going into interactive mode and prompting for netmask . After providing the netmask, installation goes through successfully.
    so please suggest me some solution to avoid it going into interactive mode.

    I have seen this too over the years and it ultimately comes down to something innate:
    Here are a few suggestions:
    1. Try and use interface ce0.
    2. Check default route on both jumpstart server and client.
    3. The arp cache may need to be flushed on the Jumpstart server.
    4. Use snoop and see what happens during the actual RARPing phase between the server and host.
    5. Switch the order in the sysid config file as indicated below:
    system_locale=en_US
    name_service=none
    network_interface=ce2
    {hostname=donau1  ip_address=10.50.57.24 netmask=255.255.252.0 protocol_ipv6=no default_route=10.50.56.1}
    security_policy=none
    terminal=vt100
    timezone="MET"
    timeserver=10.50.57.214
    nfs4_domain=dynamic
    root_password=*****************
    Please note I blanked your root password. Let me know if this helps.

  • S650 tool dl image fail

    hello every body
    about 2 weeks ago i updated my s650 phone to 4.4.2 but because of battery drain problem , decided to flash my phone using flash tool to 4.2.2(official version S650_ROW_S116_140423)
    any way
    i downloaded it and all tools , started flash_tool.exe and setup every thing.same as toutarial below !
    ROM Installation:
    - Unpack the ROM
    - Unpack FlashTools, and Click on Flash_tool.exe
    - Select a the MT6582_Android_scatter.txt from the unpacked ROM
    - Wait file to be added into Flash Tool
    - Choose Option –> USB Model, click USB Model
       –> Choose Option –> DA DownLoad All –>Speed –> High Speed, click High Speed
    - Turn off your phone, remove the battery. (YES remove the battery)
    - "Press F9 (hit Download button) "    OR    "  if upgrade ROM Firmware->Upgrade "
    - Now connect your phone into the computer via USB data cable. 
    - The process will start and a red progress bar will appear –> purple–> yellow.
    - When done, Green circle pops up!!
    well i removed my battery , pressed F9 and connected my phone to pc after download process completed.
    as i did that , progress bar's color change to red but my pc freezed after while !
    and here is the problem.
    when i connect my phone to pc , i can see it in device manager that is connected but after 2 or 3 second it will be disapeared from device manager list. even when i use USBDeview it says it is not connect (but it is).
    i installed drivers too.
    so i guess in flash process my s650 disconnected and now when i want to power it on it says:
    tool dl image fail !
    what can i do?
    tank you

    Hi ALIKING
    Can you enter the recovery mode(Vol+/- and Power)?
    My guess is that you messed up the SP Drivers(that's why the flash tool doesn't work).I suppose you're running Windows 7.
    I suggest uninstalling/reinstalling them(SP drivers)>follow the first part of message7 >
    https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Lenovo-Phones/Lenove-​S650-sound-issue/m-p/1413747/highlight/true#M3660  (''MT65xx Preloader'' will pop just for a short time so you'll have to be quick !)
    If all works out try using the V3 Flash Tool.
    Let me know how it goes.
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as ''ACCEPT AS SOLUTION"! 
    Unsolicited PM's will not be answered! ....Please post your question/s in the appropriate forum board.
    English Community   Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español   Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • System Image Fails on Windows 8.1 Pro

    Creating an image fails giving the error message shown in the attachment.   I found that the Virtual Disk and Volume Shadow Copy services were set to manual so I started them and changed startup to automatic.  The failure remains as shown.  Then, I rebooted and again got the same error message.  It fails when using an external hard drive or DVDs
    Has anyone experienced something similar when attempting to create an image and managed to overcome it?
    Attachments:
    Image failure.PNG ‏13 KB

    I attempted to install the suggested update, but it would not install as I have recently installed 8.1.  I am beginning to suspect that the problem lies in the 8.1 package in that it needs a specific update similar to the one for 8.  I examined source and destination drives in disk manager and found that the free space is not the issue.  All free space greatly exceeds the minimum levels.  I also checked usn journal size and that is not an issue either.  It might be wise to wait for a bit to see if upcoming updates will fix the problem.  My last successful update was last week when I still had Windows 8.  I have backup imaging set every Wednesday.
    Attachments:
    Disk Partitions.PNG ‏26 KB

  • Installation of Moonlight plugin fail on Firefox 6.0.2 because it is not compatible. When it will be compatible?

    I tried to install Moonlight plugin version 3.9.9 (4 preview) on the latest version of Firefox. Error message is: "Novell Moonlight could not be installed because it is not compatible with with Firefox 6.0.2".
    There isn't any versions of Moonlight that can be installed on Firefox 6.0.2.
    Moonlight plugin worked very well with previous versions of Firefex.
    Is it correct?
    When Firefox 6.0.2 will become compatible with Moonlight plugin (or vice-versa)?

    Installation of Moonlight plugin fail on Firefox 7.0.1 because it is not compatible.
    Found this, worked for me
    I found an other way: download the compatibility Reporter addon. this addon makes firefox to ignore the compatibility of the addon: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/?src=api
    Solution By passerpunt

  • I am trying to install Adobe Reader my wife's laptop but "installer" hangs up and fails with a blank black screen. The machine is capable and has a Vista OS. My wife blames the machine and wants to "throw it out." She's an idiot but I need to get this fix

    I am trying to install Adobe Reader my wife's laptop but "installer" hangs up and fails with a blank black screen. The machine is capable and has a Vista OS. My wife blames the machine and wants to "throw it out." She's an idiot but I need to get this fixed.

    run the cleaner (Download Adobe Reader and Acrobat Cleaner Tool - Adobe Labs) and then retry installing.

  • The device has encountered an unexpected error. Installation error: application verification failed

    the device has encountered an unexpected error. Installation error: application verification failed
    I have been receiving this message over and over again when trying to publish my iOS app for the app store (I use Flash cc AIR 3.9.1.1080 for iOS and my settings are: "device testing in interpreter mode", as my app uses several swfs).
    I have done everything from scratch, as recommended on other sections of the forums: new app ID from my apple developer account, new Distribution Certificates, new Distribution Provisioning Profiles and nothing works.
    I can install my app on my iPad if I use the development Certificate and Provisioning Profile and everything seems OK. But as soon as I use the Distribution Certificate and Provisioning Profile get the same message:
    the device has encountered an unexpected error. Installation error: application verification failed
    I have done everything from the beggining over and over and nothing works. Am I the only one having this issue on Flash cc???

    Hi Daniel:
    I´m far from being an expert on Xcode (or any code) but this is what I did and it worked:
    - On Xcode go to Preferences > Accounts > select your App Developer Account, then click "view details" on the lower right corner.
    - There you can see which of your "Signing Identities" (Certificates) are "Valid". You should have at least one for Development and one for Distribution.
    - Below that window there are two icons which you can use to add, export or revoke a "Signing Identitie" (Certificate).
    - Choose the one you want to use (Develop. or Distrib.), export it to the folder of the app you are working on and name it in such a way you can relate it to your app. Before knowing this I was exporting them using Keychain Access and I wasn´t naming them to differentiate each one properly.
    - On your Apple Developer account create the Provisioning Profile for your app. I deleted any App IDs or Prov. Profs. which were useless.
    - Then on my Apple Developer account I generated a Development Prov. Prof. to install and test my app on my iPad. All went fine.
    - Then an Ad Hoc Prov. Prof. again to install and test my app on my iPad. All went fine.
    - Then I generated the App Store Prov. Prof. and I was able to install the app on my device without the upsetting error.
    - Then I uploaded the app to iTunes Connect with no problem.
    These link was useful for me: https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/technotes/tn2318/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/D TS40013777-CH1-TNTAG0
    You can also search for "Certificates" and "Provisioning" on Xcode help.
    Good luck!

  • The installation of this package failed" error while installing Nov 2013 CU (KB 2889944) for SharePoint 2013

    Hi,
    I'm currently installing Nov CU on my Sharepoint 2013 farm, I have 2 APPS and 2 WFE. I successfully installed the patch in 3 servers however, I got this error "The installation of this package failed” in one of my server.
    Now i cant run the configuration wizard because it of this error.
    Any advise how on to solve this issue? it's giving me headache the whole day already.
    thanks!
    JD

    Hi Trevor,
    Thank you for your reply, I just want to share with you what i found in the msi logs.
    DEBUG: Error 2746:  Transform 9010F70000100015.0.4454.1510 invalid for package C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi. Expected product {90150000-10F7-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}, found product {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}.
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:466]: Skipping validation for patch transform #9010F70000100015.0.4454.1510.  Will not apply because previous transform was invalid
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:466]: Looking for patch transform: 9010F70000100015.0.4420.1017
    1: 2746 2: 9010F70000100015.0.4454.1510 3: C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi 4: {90150000-10F7-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 5: {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 
    DEBUG: Error 2746:  Transform 9010F70000100015.0.4420.1017 invalid for package C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi. Expected product {90150000-10F7-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}, found product {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}.
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:466]: Skipping validation for patch transform #9010F70000100015.0.4420.1017.  Will not apply because previous transform was invalid
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:466]: Looking for patch transform: 9010FB0000100015.0.4454.1510
    1: 2746 2: 9010F70000100015.0.4420.1017 3: C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi 4: {90150000-10F7-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 5: {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 
    DEBUG: Error 2746:  Transform 9010FB0000100015.0.4454.1510 invalid for package C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi. Expected product {90150000-10FB-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}, found product {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}.
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:466]: Skipping validation for patch transform #9010FB0000100015.0.4454.1510.  Will not apply because previous transform was invalid
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:466]: Looking for patch transform: 9010FB0000100015.0.4420.1017
    1: 2746 2: 9010FB0000100015.0.4454.1510 3: C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi 4: {90150000-10FB-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 5: {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 
    DEBUG: Error 2746:  Transform 9010FB0000100015.0.4420.1017 invalid for package C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi. Expected product {90150000-10FB-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}, found product {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}.
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:466]: Skipping validation for patch transform #9010FB0000100015.0.4420.1017.  Will not apply because previous transform was invalid
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:466]: Looking for patch transform: 90107F0000100015.0.4454.1510
    1: 2746 2: 9010FB0000100015.0.4420.1017 3: C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi 4: {90150000-10FB-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 5: {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 
    DEBUG: Error 2746:  Transform 90107F0000100015.0.4454.1510 invalid for package C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi. Expected product {90150000-107F-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}, found product {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}.
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:482]: Skipping validation for patch transform #90107F0000100015.0.4454.1510.  Will not apply because previous transform was invalid
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:482]: Looking for patch transform: 90107F0000100015.0.4420.1017
    1: 2746 2: 90107F0000100015.0.4454.1510 3: C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi 4: {90150000-107F-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 5: {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 
    DEBUG: Error 2746:  Transform 90107F0000100015.0.4420.1017 invalid for package C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi. Expected product {90150000-107F-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}, found product {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE}.
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:482]: Skipping validation for patch transform #90107F0000100015.0.4420.1017.  Will not apply because previous transform was invalid
    MSI (s) (A8:10) [14:34:35:482]: Looking for patch transform: 90104B0000100015.0.4454.1510
    1: 2746 2: 90107F0000100015.0.4420.1017 3: C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi 4: {90150000-107F-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 5: {90150000-104B-0000-1000-0000000FF1CE} 
    DEBUG: Error 2749:  Transform 90104B0000100015.0.4454.1510 invalid for package C:\Windows\Installer\27476d.msi. Expected product version == 15.0.4454.1510, found product version 15.0.4420.1017.
    I hope you can help me shed light on this.
    Regards,
    JD

  • Cannot load 3.6 - disk image failed to mount - reason: corrupt image

    Tried to load 3.6 and get the msg: disk image failed to mount. Reason: corrupt image.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened

    *Firefox 4 versions and later do not run on a PowerPC Mac.
    *Firefox 4 and later require at least OS X 10.5 and an Intel Mac.
    * http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/6.0/system-requirements/
    For an unofficial Firefox 4 compatible version (TenFourFox) that runs on PowerPC Macs with OS X 10.4.11 or OS X 10.5.8 you can look at:
    * http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/
    * http://tenfourfox.blogspot.com/2011/08/601-now-available.html
    Firefox 3.6.x (Mac OS X 10.4 and later) can be found here:
    * http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

  • Imaging failed with error 175

    We recently updated all of our servers with the new ZDM7NWSP1IR4HP1. We distributed the zenworks update through our zenworks for servers so we downloaded the CPK files. Updates were successful except now we have lost our reimage on next boot functionality on all servers. We get the message "imaging failed with error 175". We downloaded and tried the Zenworks Imaging Driver Update for October 2009. We tried this on one server in our environment that we use for testing purposes. This did not fix the problem.
    Can anyone help us? We don't see anything additional on the support site to patch.

    Originally Posted by spond
    Busytech710,
    could you please
    1) boot to ZENworks maintenance mode
    2) export DEVELOPER_LOG=a
    3) perform the imaging task and send me the imglog
    spond at novell dot com
    Shaun Pond
    I will be glad to try this and send you the log. I too tried installing the service pack with winsetup.exe and found that also worked for me as far as making image on next boot work. We really want the CPK method to work as we have so many servers and we were able to update them all in one day versus weeks using winsetup.exe. I'll respond back with info you need as soon as possible.

  • Images fail to load completely

    I regularly visit a web site which displays many photographs. Often some of the images fail to load completely, I may see the top 30% of the image and the rest shows as a grey box. Pasting the same URL into Firefox, shows the whole image.
    Any ideas? This has been a long term problem with Safari, both on a MBP and PowerBook G4.
    MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    Helpful if you post the web site so we can have a look.

  • When I download the 3.6.3 version I get a warning pop up saying 'the following disk images failed to mount'. What do I need to do to stop this from happening?

    After downloading the a pop up box called Warning appears with saying 'The following disk images failed to mount' and below that there is a table that has Image with a Firefox 3.6.3 and another field called Reason saying Corrupt image. The current version of firefox I am using is 2.0.0.7
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == Recently when trying to download a newer version

    Firefox 3.0 and 3.5/6 versions require at least Mac OS X 10.4
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/system-requirements.html - Mozilla Firefox 3.6 System Requirements
    Firefox 2.0.0.20 is the last release that runs on Mac OS X 10.2 and 10.3
    See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Installing_Firefox
    Mac: http://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-2.0.0.20&os=osx&lang=en-US

Maybe you are looking for