Just how much better is nattres than compressor in converting pal - NTSC?

I am on the verge of buying the Nattres plugin but before i do i would like to know how much better it is than compressor. I did some test with compressor and the results are unacceptable. I have to send some stock footage to America from here in South Africa. The footage im trying to convert is half Betacam half DVCPROHD.
Thanks
Andre
I have posted this thread in the compressor forum but didnt quite get the answer i was looking for, although it was helpful

I don't think Natress is over $75.
Natress is the only plug-in or software that has given us consistent results.
It also does PAL to NTSC or NTSC to PAL.
Rendering can take a while depending on the length of your sequence.
Edit in PAL and when you are done duplicate your sequence and make an NTSC version. You can then avoid having to convert footage that doesn't end up in your final sequence.

Similar Messages

Does any body have any opinions on how much better CS6 is than Cs4?

Does any body have any opinions on how much better CS6 is than Cs4? The reason I ask is I am trying to convince my business partner that CS6 is worth buying

My pattern has been that every other new version made it worth my while. I spent very little time working in CS4, since I went from CS3, to CS4 with an immediate upgrade to CS5. Then from CS5 to CS5.5 with an immediate upgrade to CS6. I have not gone to the cloud, so cannot comment on the features there. I would still evaluate your price for CS6 against the rental expense.
I like Todd Kopriva's page laying out the CS6 new/changes features:
Premiere Pro CS6: what’s new and changed
That page contains other links (e.g. CS5 and CS5.5 changes).
In addition to cc_merchant's points about 64 bit (which were HUGE and for CS6 included Encore going to 64 bit), I found these items from the "new" list as important to me:
adjustment layers (HUGE)
expanded multi-camera editing, with more multicam angles and improved interface (I hated only having 4 angles, although that usually worked)
improved color features, including integration with SpeedGrade and redesigned Three-Way Color Corrector effect
improved workflows with other applications in Adobe Creative Suite, as well as with Final Cut Pro and Avid software
faster Adobe Media Encoder, redesigned to make authoring for multiple outputs and mobile devices easier (batch processing was added with CS4, but it wasn't until CS6, with other enhancements that I really worked it)
enhanced Adobe Encore for creation of DVDs, Blu-ray Discs, and web DVDs (Bluray chapter playlists finally; I have used the flash output, which has gotten better at each step)

Never new how much better macs are than windows until I just got one myself

its just so much faster, better organized, easier to use and isn't loaded with bugs and virus's
and the best part, it has the ability to dual boot to a windows OS if you want
I'm just loving it

...and the more you use it the more you'll love it.
ultimately, you'll find yourself regretting all those years of living with a windows machine
welcome on board

How much better are ACDs than older Studio Display LCDs?

I have a pretty old 17" Apple Studio Display LCD. I'm thinking of upgrading to a new ACD 20" or 23". Aside from the increase in size, is there a significant difference in the quality of the ACDs vs. the older Studio Displays like the one I have?

Badlydrawnboy wrote:
Wow. So you're saying the quality of my 17" Studio Display is actually equal to or higher than the quality of the newer ACDs? If that's true, I guess the only reason to get a new display would be for the larger viewing area.
Elsewhere in another forum someone suggested that the ACDs were higher quality, but he didn't give any details.
No, I think BSteely is only specifically talking about 17" screens. Not all screens. The 17" monitors have not improved much since when you bought your older screen, because 17" monitors are now seen as a low end point in the market. Generally, people only buy a 17" screen if they have very little money to spend, or if they just need a very basic monitor for an office, etc. So even modern 17" monitors aren't especially good. The same goes for many other sizes too, because companies seem to be focusing on mass producing cheaper monitors with cheaper components, but there are exeptions. With modern screens, there are always SOME screens that are high quality. Most of the DELL screens, and the Apple Cinema Display's for example, use the best panels available today. They aren't perfect, but monitors that use the best panels on the market (IPS/S-IPS/AS-IPS), have good colours, good brightness and contrast, fairly decent speed, and are generally pretty good. But you have to specifically look out for screens like that, because mostly, modern monitors are using cheap TN panels which aren't that good.
Message was edited by: telelove

How much better is 2g than 1g?

I want a second generation Touch, but my first one works perfectly fine.
Besides the internal speaker and battery life, is there anything significant in 2g? Is Safari more stable? Is 2g's performance better? I want a 2g, but I also want to know if there are any improvements made to make it better. Thanks

2G = 1G +:
Internal speaker
Volume control
Microphone capability
Nike iPod interface
Thinner profile
USB (5V) only
If you have older iPod peripherals (> 1 year old), you may not be able to use them with the G2.
It's probably not worth it if someone has to convince you to upgrade.

How much better is the iPod Touch 5 than iTouch 4?

I was wondering how much better the itouch 5 is than the 4. The 4" screen is obvious. But are there more features or better graphics and processor speeds? I just would like to know overall how much better it is. Thanks

There is a lightning to HDMI cable now:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD826ZM/A/lightning-digital-av-adapter?fnode=4 5
It is 1/2 the price of an Apple TV though

How much better is VBR 2 Pass than VBR 1 Pass or CBR?

Hi,
I had a 2 hour and 40 minute wedding on a Premiere Pro CS 5.5 Timeline. (I exported it as a QT Reference File from Final Cut Pro 7)
I added my Encore Chapter markers in PPro and went File ----- Export ---- Media.
Media Encoder opened and I set my settings the following way:
H.264 Blu-Ray
1440 x 1080 29.97 FPS
PCM Audio
Target Bit Rat = 18.5
Max Bit Rate 20
VBR 2 Pass
When it first started encoding it said that it was going to take 8 hours.
It has taken 14 Hours and it's finally finished.
My question is,
How much better is VBR 2 Pass than VBR 1 Pass or CBR?
The first pass of this job took about 3 and a half hours. The last 11 hours was the full 2 Pass.
Would VBR 1 Pass or CBR give a good enough quality as an H.264 Blu-Ray to give to clients.
Thanks in advance
Premiere Pro CS 5.5
Media Encoder 5.5
Encore 5
Mac Pro
10 GB RAM
2.66 GHZ Quad-Core Intel Xeon

Depends what you mean by "better". Multiple passes are done to reduce the file size (by more appropriate changes in bitrate for each moment in the footage). It's not designed to change the quality of the displayed frames, though it can have a small-but-noticeable quality effect on certain types of footage (e.g. a presentation that mixes static slides with high-motion video). If you can't see the difference in your footage, and you don't care about making the smallest possible file, VBR1 will get your clips done a lot faster.

For the 24 inchers...how much better is the ATI over the NVIDIA?

Well, I just purchased the new 24in IMac at 3.06 ghz with its basic options....4gb ram, TB hard drive and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 video card. My friend, coincedentally bought the same one just a few days later, however its refurbished, has the (only) other video card option, I believe the ATI Radeon HD 4850. My friend has relentlessly teased me saying their IMac is "better" than mine. Now this doesn't all bother that much, however, according to the apple website, at only $50 more for the "better" ATI video card....how much better is it actually? Will the performance be that noticable in applications such as After Effects and Motion? If anybody can clear up the $50 difference and as to why that is, I'd appreciate it.

I don't know how much detail you want in the answer, but Apple has basic comparisons between the GT 130 and the 4850. Go here
http://www.apple.com/imac/features.html
and click on +View the iMac Graphics Performance Chart+ link under +Fast, faster, or fastest?+
On the plus side (for your choice), Apple seems to be working more closely with NVIDIA these days. That may (or may not) be beneficial when Snow Leopard is released.

How much better is the 256mb video card?

I am shopping to get a new laptop and am sold on the MacbookPro 15'' model, but a I am wondering how much better the 2.16 model is than the 2.00.
My real concern is in the video card. If I get the 2.0GHZ model with 1GB of RAM should I just upgrade to the 2.16 and get double the video card.
How much of disadvantage will I be at with 128mb graphics card running say Adobe Illustartor(if the Intel version ever comes out.)
Thanks
Dell 8300 Windows XP
Dell 8300 Windows XP

Actually it's more of the opposite. Unless you are
playing a game like Oblivion, the extra Vram will not
make any noticeable difference in games. The pipes
and frequency are the same on both models. The extra
Vram helps in editting situations as there is more to
draw from.
Never did I say it will make a noticable difference in games, I said 5-10%. I don't know what "editting situations" is but in most programs it does not help at all unless the program uses GPU to render rich 3d graphics such as animation programs.
I just have a MBP so can't offer a firsthand account
but I did read an online magazine I think in the UK
where they compared gaming performance between the
two and it was huge. One some popular games the
performance was like
60 FPS MBP
10 FPS MB
I don't recall the exact games they tested but there
WAS a big gaming difference. So check it out and
google for some test results.
Thats Macbook vs. Macbook Pro i.e. Intel Integraed video card vs. X1600, he wants to know how x1600 256mb compares to the 128mb version.

How much better is the new Graphic Card?

How much better is the new graphic card compared to the X1600 256mb in the older 2.33 Core 2 duo's? Im a gamer and was wondering if there is gonna be a big difference or just a small difference?

Hi,
according to this there seems to be a big advantage: http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/graphics.html
(Scroll down to the bottom).
Regards
Stefan

How much better is GB'08 than GB3?

Hi guys,
Is GB'08 much better than GB3? Does it sound any better?
Love to hear your opinions,
Hope everyone's well,
Tony xx

I'm a little hobbled being a thousand or so mile from Home (Christoph is in NYC, and only one of us can be in one area of the world, or, well, let's just say words like "tear" and "fabric of spacetime" would be involved ... very bad), but i'm glad to hear it helped. GB08 rocks ... good luck

Has anyone upgraded to MBP from Macbook..how much better is it?

I currently have a Macbook..1st generation Core Duo, I am very happy with it, has been relatively problem free apart from the RSS (Apple Service fixed this so no complaints). When I bought this it was supposed to be an interim measure that would do until I returned home to the UK after working abroad for a few years afterwhich I intended to then buy either an iMac or Mac Pro. I am doing a lot of video editing (hours and hours of DV tapes to get through!) and was hoping to use Final Cut Express. I have now just found out that I may be posted abroad again so I am now rethinking and considering a Macbook Pro. I really want a good upgrade from the Macbook as although it is a great little laptop for most things I feel that I need a lot more speed, better graphics and screen for the video work. How does a MBP compare to say an iMac, and how much of an improvement can I expect after the Macbook? It would not be impossible to have a desktop shipped to my next post but I am not sure I want to trust the movers not to break it and feel better taking a portable with me, but I have so been looking forward to getting a better spec'd Mac.
What to do...? Will I be happy with a MBP as an alternative to an iMac?

I've just done the same thing you're thinking about doing. I have a first gen Core Duo BlackBook. I absolutely love it. I was in the market for something with the Santa Rosa chipset and beefier graphics capabilities. I was looking at PC notebooks... but I couldn't find anything in the price range of the MacBook Pro that was similarly spec'd and with a similar form factor. The days of Apple notebooks being overpriced are long gone with their move to Intel. Unfortunately... many people still equate Apple products with being over priced. Anyway... I almost "settled" for an HP notebook that was about $500 less than the MacBook Pro. It didn't have nearly the MacBook Pros beautiful svelte form factor... it had an Intel Core 2 Duo 7300 (which is in the high end of PC notebooks sporting the Santa Rosa chipset), it had an integrated GPU (albeit the newer one that is part of the Santa Rosa chipset... better than the GMA950... but not as good as a dedicated solution... especially the bleeding edge nVidia GPU in the MacBook Pro)... I think I almost ordered the thing about a half dozen times but kept talking myself out of it. I finally decided to go with the MacBook Pro. It just seemed silly to go with a PC. With either a MacBook or a MacBook Pro... you're basically getting two computers for the price of one... a Mac and a PC. Getting a PC notebook seemed like a waste of money. I ended up getting the base model MacBook Pro. It was a little more expensive than I was looking to spend at about $2,000... but dollar for dollar, it was the best value out there. Using the Migration Assistant to move my data over from my MacBook was a snap (I was actually surprised at how well it worked). It's faster and cooler. The one issue I always had with my MacBook is that the fans revved up to pretty loud levels when the system was under a moderate load. The MacBook Pro runs nice and quiet... only revving up the fans when the load/temp gets to a level that I would consider it normal to do so. The keyboard is a matter of preference. I like the MacBook keyboard... and I like the MacBook Pro keyboard... I can't say I prefer one over the other. The backlit keys are kinda cool on the Pro... though I don't typically find myself using my computer in an environment dark enough to have the backlighting come on. Another thing with the BlackBook was the finish... those things attract fingerprints like no ones business. The aluminum case on the Pro is great... scratch resistant and not prone to showing fingerprints at all. I also don't worry about my MacBook as much as I used to now that I have my MacBook Pro. I feel comfortable with being a little more rough with it... and I don't worry about washing my hands right before using it each and every time to avoid getting prints on it. I love my MacBook... but I love my MacBook Pro even more. It basically eliminated everything that I had an issue with on my MacBool.

How much better is Garageband over free Windows Software?.

I'm running Garageband 2.0.2 because I have an old mac powerbook 800Mhz that apparently won't run the 2 newer versions very well. Honestly, I task this poor old girl pretty hard when using Garageband, but I definitely make it work, since I can't afford to buy a newer mac.
So I posted a video on youtube of the video I did using my 6 year old powerbook with Garageband 2.0, plus a copy of Final Cut Express 3.0... Everything was done on the powerbook. Plus I got a hold of a guy I met over Youtube from the Netherlands (I'm from Denver) to play the guitar parts, I did everything else... He just emailed me mp3 files of his recordings, which I overlaid in Garageband, which worked flawlessly...
So during the video, I made many mentions of using an old mac laptop and the free Garageband software to do the entire recording.... We're getting like 2000 hits a day right now, but no one is mentioned anything about the powerbook or the free software. We're getting a lot of hits because the video/audio that I put up is actually top notch quality (of course, it was done in GB on the mac!!!) and people are blown away by it...
My question is why do people not appreciate what the macs can do out of the box, compared to Windows boxes??? I have a hard time with this topic. I work on PC's for a living, but have used macs for 7 years personally because they are so much better...
Any thoughts?
Also, I"m sorry if this post doesn't belong here, but I wanted to get some feedback (from people that appreciate GB) on how great not only the mac is, but GB, too... Especially for being free software that comes with the computer. Plus, this project opened up, for me, anyway, the real power behind Garageband. I've used it for years, but with this project, I had to learn so much about it... I don't have any books or anything, I just figured it out and it's so easy and intuitive...
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Jimmy
oh, if you're curious about the project, it's a cover of Hotel California with over 30 tracks of vocals, percussion, piano, guitars, etc., and it's here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAM1g0oX4OE

Actually it's more of the opposite. Unless you are
playing a game like Oblivion, the extra Vram will not
make any noticeable difference in games. The pipes
and frequency are the same on both models. The extra
Vram helps in editting situations as there is more to
draw from.
Never did I say it will make a noticable difference in games, I said 5-10%. I don't know what "editting situations" is but in most programs it does not help at all unless the program uses GPU to render rich 3d graphics such as animation programs.
I just have a MBP so can't offer a firsthand account
but I did read an online magazine I think in the UK
where they compared gaming performance between the
two and it was huge. One some popular games the
performance was like
60 FPS MBP
10 FPS MB
I don't recall the exact games they tested but there
WAS a big gaming difference. So check it out and
google for some test results.
Thats Macbook vs. Macbook Pro i.e. Intel Integraed video card vs. X1600, he wants to know how x1600 256mb compares to the 128mb version.

How much better is Logic Pro?

Would it be a real disadvantage to get logic express over Logic, i mean has it still got all the loops, synths, drum machines and actual audio recording capabilities?
Thanks

Pro is much better imo, but depending on your budget and needs you might not need it. What I did was to purchase Logic Express first, learned it, liked it and then upgraded from Logic Express to Logic Pro once I found that I wanted the plugins and some options found in pro, this winter. That's a good route since it doesn't cost much more (Express$ + Upgrade$ ~= Pro$) and allowed me to have a much better idea for why I wanted Pro. I might have chosen not to buy it if I found so, but I did (and a the extra time accumulating money helped :-))

How much better is the 7300GT than the X1600 Radeon?

I'm contemplating getting an iMac. I still haven't decided whether I should wait to see if Apple does an Aluminium iMac with a matte screen.
But if I decide to buy now, I have a choice of two macs, the 24 inch white and 20 inch white ones. I can't get a mac with a 7600GT, but I was wondering if there's a significant difference between the graphics card in the 20 inch - a 1600 Radeon and the 7300GT in the 24 inch. I suspect the 24 inch screen might be a bit too big, but then again, the graphics card might be more powerful.

Me again... let me approach this in a different way:
I'm very close to upgrading my current Mac (DP 1.8 G5) with the 2.4/24" imac - everything I've read tells me it will be faster and it runs on Intel chips which means I can run Windows should I want/need to. My only reason for potentially installing windows is to play a few games which aren't available for the Mac such as MS Flight Sim. In any event, I know the bulk of messages on this board are people trying to resolve issues, etc. - but does anyone have the 24"/2.4 alum iMac with the HD 2600 card and playing any games on Mac and Windows and all is just fine? I'd love to hear some good news on this!
Thanks,
Steve

Just how much better is nattres than compressor in converting pal - NTSC?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for