K9A Platinum RAID - Be careful if you're considering this MB

Unbeknownst to me when I purchased this board to replace my ASUS P4S8X which had a Promise FastTrak 376 SATA RAID controller, when you create a mirrorset on the K9A Platinum you *cannot* preserve data. In my wildest dreams I didn't think that would be that way so I never thought to ask before I bought it. A RAID controller that can't preserve that data on one of its members?? Mind boggling to say the least.
Yes folks and it's true, confirmed by MSI support:
"ATI Raid Controller does not support this feature which is the chipset limitation which you will need to create the raid array and have a fresh install."
That's real nice eh? Completely re-install everything from scratch? <<Removed>> I just did that a week and an a half ago when I lost the MBR after a failed disk and Windoze fixmbr clobbered the partition table. That took 16 hours not including the Windoze install time. Don't want to do that again.
Plan B: Boot a knoppix CD and use dd_rescue to duplicate the disks then create the mirrorset, sync them and cross my fingers.
But that's only the half of it. In playing around with changing the IDE setting from Native IDE to raid, XP blue screens after the Logo with a 7b error. Haven't looked into that yet but I suspect it's because it doesn't have the drivers for the now raid controller. I'll worry about that once I have a sync'd mirrorset created.
When the IDE chipset is set to RAID in the BOIS I tried booting Windoze install disk and adding in the drivers for the now RAID chipset, it fails every time. I think I'm using the right drivers, need to confirm that, ahci8086, but every time it tries to load the driver it tells me that ahci8086.sys is corrupt. I've downloaded it numerous times with the same result. Same thing with the one off the included CD. The ahci8086.sys file is dated 5/18/2006 and I've got the latest which is dated 7/27/2006 which I don't think I tried yet but plan too. If I'm using the wrong driver for when the IDE BOIS is in RAID mode, please let me know but that's what is delivered in the ATI SB600 IDE RAID download so I assume that would be correct. Or maybe I'm supposed to be using one of the Silicon Image driver sets, I couldn't find any information anywhere on what is the correct driver.

I got censored?!?! I don't know where this Forum is headquartered or based, but here in the United States of America we have a thing called "Free Speech" that protects the citizens of our Country from exactly what has just occurred here.
What was censored wasn't really that bad, no profane language or anything, just a reference to the shortsightedness of some engineers. I hope this isn't a Forum where you're only Welcome if you post "MSI is GREAT!" and are not allowed to even whisper anything even slightly negative about them...
As a background I've been in IT support roles for around 25 years. Managed Digital Equipment Corp. VAX's and Alpha's (VMS, ULTIRX, and Tru64 UNIX, started using VAX's in 1978), Sun's Enterprise large servers and assortment of other SPARC boxes (Solaris), IBM 6x0's, and a host of smaller systems running both UNIX and Linux. I cut my teeth on DEC's ULTRIX.
That said, to come across a RAID controller in the year 2006 that will not allow you to preserve the data on one of its members when creating a mirrorset is just unconscionable. So I made reference to the shortsightedness of the engineers by referring that they might be something, and that got censored. I was hoping that might be a wakeup call to these engineers, sort of like a 2x4 upside the head, so they don't make a mistake like this again.
And I learned something else about the ATI SB600 South Bridge RAID controller which once again is just unconscionable. If you take a disk with a filesystem on it, with data, and have the SB600 present it to the OS as a JBOD, it clears the partition table. What!?!? Yes. There is no warning that this is going to occur. Promise's FastTrak controllers *do not* wipe out the partition table. They just present any disk that is not part of a mirrorset to the OS. That seems like a really good idea, ya think? But the SB600 don't do that, it doesn't present the disk to the OS unless it is part of and LD so you have to assign it to one as a JBOD. Poof! Partition table gone!
I just cannot fathom the mindset of the engineers that created the ATI SB600 South Bridge RAID functionality. They just do not seem to be aware of what is expected of a RAID controller in this day and age. They must live their life very sheltered and not have any idea of what other vendors are doing and what the users of their products expect.
Bottom line: The MSI K9A Platinum seems to be a decent MB, but better suited for an full install from scratch then as a replacement MB for an existing, running, seasoned system, if the objective is to use the SB600 RAID controller and preserve existing data on existing disks. I know there's multiple ways to get around this, but that's jumping through hoops that I never had to jump through before.
If anyone is interested I was able to use my existing disk's mirrorset and preserve the OS and data on them.
The steps:
1. Know which is the disk you want to use and duplicate the data from, like Port 1 Master (this is related to SATA drives connected to the MB).
2. Using the FastBuild BIOS Utility create a mirrorset using the two drives. Set Gigabyte Boundary to OFF, set Fast Init to OFF. DO NOT SET Fast Init TO ON, YOU WILL LOSE YOUR MBR!
NOTE! NOTE! NOTE! If you're so inclined to use the ATI SATA RAID Utility that you can get from MSI's website to initially create the mirrorset that comes along with WebPAM which you put and use on a bootable floppy, DO NOT "Initialize Array", DO NOT "Synchronize Array", NO, NO, NO!
3. Boot the OS if it will boot but I doubt it BUT DON'T LET IT BOOT INTO THE OS. With the OS only really on one of the disks I don't know what would happened and if the RAID controller uses the "Read Least Busy" algorithm who knows what will happened.
4. Power down the system and unplug the SATA drive that DOES NOT have the OS on it.
5. See if the system will boot. If so great, proceed to step 7.
6. Do what you have to do to get the system to boot with only the one, original drive connected and in the mirrorset. Ignore for now the FastBuild warnings on boot that mirrorset is CRITICAL. In my case I had to use the Windows XP install CD and Repair an existing installation.
7. Install from MSI ATI's WebPAM utility.
8. Power down the system.
9. Connect the SATA drive that is to be the second member of the mirrorset that you disconnected in step 4. Power up the system. When you get FastBuild's warning that your mirrorset is CRITICAL ignore it. DO NOT GO INTO THE FASTBUILD BIOS AND DO A REBUILD THERE. NO! NO! NO! I tried that once on a 500GB mirrorset and after 8 hours with the drive activity light blinking sort of dimly it's progress was still at 0%.
10. Once the OS is running (Windows I presume, XP Pro in my case), start WebPAM. if all went well you will see that WebPAM knew the mirrorset was missing a member, found the FREE drive you reconnected in step 9, and is already in the process of rebuilding the mirrorset. If not, you can manually start the rebuilding process in WebPAM.
Of note, WebPAM only took somewhere in the neighborhood of 2 to 3 hours to rebuild the 500GB mirrorset as opposed to the BIOS rebuild running for 8 hours and accomplishing nothing. (This wasn't a one time anomaly, I had tried it before letting it run a few hours and saw no progress. The 8 hour run was just to be sure.) While the WebPAM rebuild is running you are in Windows and it is running and you could do other things. I didn't though, I left it run until it finished.
There ya go, a rather unorthodox way to make a mirrorset on a MSI K9A Platinum preserving your OS and data and getting around the shortcomings of the ATI SB600 South Bridge RAID implementation.
And I know I could have used Ghost. But that is in hindsight. I would have had to know I needed to do that *before* removing and replacing the MB. But I didn't do that, because I didn't know I was dealing with a brain dead RAID controller.
<Added some more info in the steps.>

Similar Messages

  • K9A Platinum Raid Drivers, Windows Install Issue

    I unzipped the "ATI IDE RAID" driver to a floppy, but I can't get the windows install to recognize it.  It just goes to the "Please insert the disk labeled 'Manufacturer-supplied hardware suppor disk' into Drive A: and press ENTER" screen.  I'm not sure what's wrong, as everything is connected, am I doing something wrong making the disk?

    Yeah, I've used two different ones, and they both work fine on the computer I'm writing them with, I was wondering if you had to mess with the files, like put them all in the same folder or somesuch (I've tried that), or if you just unzipped to the diskette (tried that too).  Is there cause to suspect the drive itself at this point?

  • K9a platinum raid setup options?

    few quick questions.
    for raid 0 what do the following options mean?
    gigabyte boundary? default is on. should it be?
    next is fast write default is off but i turned it on?
    stripe/block size? is smaller better or bigger better?
    lastly, can i partition a raid 0 array? or is it a bad idea?
    thanx.
    p.s. i already set mine up but maybe when i upgrade to vista later i would like to have a better understanding of it.
    i set my boundary to on, my fast write to on and my stripe/block size to 64k since it matches the block size for my NTFS. drives are 2 wd 150 gb raptors.

    Quote from: msiguy on 26-September-07, 08:31:02
    few quick questions.
    for raid 0 what do the following options mean?
    gigabyte boundary? default is on. should it be?
    It means that the raid-size is in GB's only and not parts of them. Just leave it like it is. No reason to mess around with it.
    Quote
    next is fast write default is off but i turned it on?
    I don't know what it does exactly, but I suppose it has to do with the way data is written to the array. I'd leave it at the default value for now.
    Quote
    stripe/block size? is smaller better or bigger better?
    There is no good answer to that. You need to understand first how a striped array works. For example: if you have a raid 0 with two disks, the following situation exists. When the blocksize is set to 64kB and you write a 128kB file, the file is split in two 64kB parts. Those parts are written to both disks at the same time. So, disk A receives one part and disk B receives the other part at the same time. Now, the smaller the blocksize is set, the more files will be split. (You see, a 64kB file cannot be split in smaller pieces, since it is equal to the block size of the RAID-0).
    So, the answer is something like this: if you use many small files, setting a small blocksize is better (for example, when you install Windows on the RAID). When you use it for data storage (many large files), larger blocksizes are better. If you are not sure, set it to 64 or Auto.
    Quote
    lastly, can i partition a raid 0 array? or is it a bad idea?
    Yes, you can. No problem.
    Quote
    thanx.
    You're welcome!
    Quote
    p.s. i already set mine up but maybe when i upgrade to vista later i would like to have a better understanding of it.
    [/size]
    I hope you will wait a bit with that ....
    Quote
    i set my boundary to on, my fast write to on and my stripe/block size to 64k since it matches the block size for my NTFS. drives are 2 wd 150 gb raptors.
    If it is working fine now, just leave it alone.
    Note this: if one of your disks gets damaged, or when data is lost from it, you will lose the whole RAID array and all the data on it. So, it is important to backup everything regularly.

  • K9A Platinum Raid Drivers = Information

    Just figured I would let everyone know that for some reason MSI has two Raid Drivers listed for this.  The "IDE" Raid Drivers are the actual ATI Raid Drivers.
    Why they have SI Drivers, the "SATA" raid drivers, listed is beyond me.  I grabbed them first thinking they were what I needed only to discover "after" I was home from my Fiance's w/ a Laptop with no floppy that they were the wrong drivers.....

    Does anyone know where I can get working drivers?  Because without them, I can't get the Windows installation to detect my hard drives. 

  • K9A Platinum Low Raid 0 Performance?

    hi i just build this pc a few days ago and i did some tests on my raid using HD Tach (and on a website called pcpitstop.com)
    both of these seem to be reporting my hard drives are doing no more than 80MB/s ... even though i have setup RAID 0 for 3 drives on the utility with the motherboard,
    a friend of mine (who uses 4 drives in raid 0 of EXACTLY the same type of hard drive) gets more than 320MB/s on his drives ....
    i fail to see how 3 of my drives = 80 MB/s, whilst 4 of his = 320MB/s
    I installed the driver and took off the jumper at the back of the drive (to make them SATA II)
    I checked the RAID config utility and all the settings seem to be perfect, however the drives seem to be failing to deliver the transfer speed i am looking for ...
    My IDE drive is comparable to this setup, which kind of defies the point of me paying so much money for a RAID setup that's giving me the performance of only one of my drives
    Windows recognises one drive, and says RAID 0 so i guess the RAID is working it's just not performing properly
    Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated,
    thanks

    Quote from: Hans on 14-June-07, 03:56:02
    Hi!
    Please read Moan Guide first.
    In general: RAID-0 performance is often exaggerated, although your speed seems to be too low. RAID-0 speeds depend on many things: the way the RAID has been set up (block/chunk size, driver, disks, controller, etc). Furthermore, different bench tools will show you different speeds, so don't depend too much on what a tool tells you.
    *Edit: don't confuse burst speed with average read/write speeds! The burst speed can exceed the read/write speeds by a factor more than 2!
    Some tips you may want to try:
    - enable/disable NCQ (Device Manager -> SCSI/RAID-devices);
    - try a different block size;
    - try a different/newer driver or try the driver that came with the board;
    - use the manufacturer's disk tool to have all disks checked for any errors. You may need to connect them as if they are IDE's to make them being recognized properly.
    Then this: As far as I'm aware, Windows will not show RAID-0, unless you set up the RAID through Windows disk manager (system tools). If you did setup through Windows disk manager, please setup RAID again using the RAID bios on you board.
    hey thanks for the reply, i'll try and give you some more info on what's going on;
    firstly some more computer specs:
    CPU: AMD Athlon 64 bit dual core 5000+
    Graphics: ATI x1950XT-X Crossfire Edition (Single card at the moment)
    Mobo: K9A Platinum (havent updated bios yet)
    PSU: OCZ GameXStream 700W
    RAM: Corsair 2GB DDR2 XMS2 Dominator DHX PC2-6400C4 TwinX (2x1GB)
    HDD: 3xSeagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB ST3320620AS SATA-II 16MB Cache  - (Took the jumpers off the back to make them SATA II)
    The motherboard uses the ATI XPRESS 3200 chipset, which supports up to 4x SATA II Drives, this is what i have used to connect the hard drives to. The Motherboard also offers a RAID utility for 0,1, and 0+1 RAID - i have used raid 0 with block size 128KB (it offered 64 or 128), FastInit was ON, and the other 2 settings i couldnt change, i activated all drives to the array and setup (in the BIOS) for the SATA's to be seen as a RAID configuration.
    The latest drivers i used was catalyst 7.5 available from ATI website, the drivers on the CD dont work because i use Vista 64, and the CD says it doesnt support my OS, so i downloaded them.
    In response to windows seeing the RAID .... i meant it see's one normal hard drive but the disk comes up as a RAID SCSI device in Propeties -> Hardware, that is the name the RAID utility (straight after POST) gives to the array i think, and so windows recognises it as one.

  • K9A Platinum - Not seeing RAID Array on restart...

    Hello again guys...
    Here's the deal...
    The computer will not recognize the RAID array when I choose to restart from inside Windows. If I press the reset on the computer or I do a shutdown then reboot, it works fine. Also, this morning I finished a clean install of Vista 64 and forgot to turn off sleep mode like I normally do, and when I came back home I got a tasty blue screen. When I tired to restart I got a message stating that the RAID driver was corrupt or missing. I reloaded Vista again, but I still have the issue of the machine not seeing the RAID array upon restart, and I have tried this about 10 times with the same results.
    Restart = No Recognized RAID Array.
    Cold Boot, Reset Switch or CTRL+ALT+DEL = No problems.
    My system specs are in my sig below.
    There was one other tidbit, I had a problem with this motherboard failing to load Windows with 4GB of RAM installed when I first got her, and thru this forum and the MSI help center, it was suggested I update my BIOS to a beta version that was out at the time. I see now that the version is now a standard release v1.6, should I go to the release BIOS or just stay with the current one?
    Thanks for your time! 

    Yes I can.  I first installed XP Pro since I was testing system stability with my new 6000+.  Every soft reboot results in the array being undefined.  I have to wait until the controller scans and says there is no array, then I can reset it to make it see the arrays.  If I reset before the controller scans, it still shows no arrays.
    Vista 64 Ultimate will only install on my K9A platinum if the following is true:
    1) The SATA controller is in RAID mode, I have 4 SATA HD's, none are striped, and my DVD is external
    2) The desired HD/array must be the first boot device, if the DVD is first it will refuse to recognize the partition as valid to use
    If I use Native IDE or AHCI mode, Vista doesn't see any partitions.  If I use Legacy IDE mode, Vista will start the install, but on reboot the motherboard pauses for 5 minutes and tells me the HD has an error and I have to hit F1 to continue.
    I only recently got  Vista 64 Ultimate stable again.  I was having a problem where the system would power off instantly when it reached the desktop.  I replaced the power supply.  I then had trouble getting the drivers installed without crashing the OS.  One thing I noticed while reinstalling Vista is that Microsoft automatically updates the driver for the RAID Controller. The driver version is 2.5.1540.41 and the version that the ATI 7.6. and 7.7 want to install in 2.5.1540.36. That would put it out of sync with the ATI RAID Console driver.  The next reboot would result in crashing.  Can't prove that is why though.

  • MSI K9A Platinum and VIA drivers issue? XP 0x0000007B stop error.

    I get a Windows Stop error when trying to boot into Windows XP with new components. The SATA hard drive (and Windows XP installation) is from the old computer.
    The new computer components are:
    MB: MSI K9A Platinum, chipset: RD580 (North Bridge), SB600 (South Bridge)
    CPU: AMD Athlon 64 x2 5600+, boxed (the cooler and fan came with the CPU).
    Video: MSI Radeon 1950 XTX
    The old (and working) computer setup is:
    OS: XP Professional
    MB: Abit AV8-3rd Eye, chipset: VIA K8T800Pro + VT8237
    CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3500+
    Video: Sapphire Radeon 9800Pro All-in-Wonder, videodriver: atidvag.dll version 6.14.10.6542
    HD: Maxtor 6B200M0 SCSI Disk Device
    BIOS: Phoenix 6.00PG 20.04.2005
    System drivers with "via" in the name: VIAAGP1.SYS, viaide.sys, viasride.sys
    VIA 4in1 (Hyperion) version: 4.55 (that can be found at HKEY_Local_Machine\Software\Via4in1Driver).
    VIA 2.20e SATA/RAID driver was used when installing this computer setup.
    The precise stop error is:
    0x0000007B (0xba4c3528, 0xc0000034, 0x00000000, 0x00000000)
    From many sites I have gathered that the error is related to Windows XP not being able to access a critical system drive. Most probably the SATA hard drive issue.
    The problem probably is the VIA drivers of the old motherboard and/or the SATA driver.
    First I should mention, that MSI K9A Platinum does not have a hard disk SATA driver. If it does, I have been unable to find one. Certainly no such floppy disk included, and no such driver in the MSI's Web page for this motherboard.
    Second important point: I never used RAID. I did use VIA 2.20e SATA/RAID driver disk when installing Windows XP to the old computer.
    Strange that the hard drive model is reported as a "SCSI Disk Device". It's not a SCSI drive however: it's a SATA disk.
    I have tried to uninstal the motherboard chipset drivers (Hyperion v4.55), but there seems to be a bug here: the drivers should be uninstalled using the installation program, and select the uninstall option. However, I do not get the uninstallation option to choose at all! Yes, I'm using the normal installation mode, not the quick installation (although tried that, too). The Hyperion setup program just installs, and asks to reboot the computer. After rebooting and trying again, it still does not offer me an uninstallation choise.
    I know how to install hard drive VIA SATA driver, but I have no idea how to uninstall it. And I'm afraid to do that without certainty that it IS the solution, since I could not access the hard drive any more in the old computer setup (and return to read this forum). Also, I do not have a floppy drive any more. Anyone know if there is an issue with K9A and XP having VIA SATA driver installed?
    When I tried the new computer setup, I first tried the simplest possible hardware combination: there were no CD/DVD-drives, no (parallel)IDE hard drives, and no PCI cards, except the MSI video adapter.
    My BIOS Setup experiments. None of these helped: got the same stop error each time.
    1) I didn't much touch the BIOS setting first. Just tried to boot with the settings BIOS came with.
    2) Next I disabled the integrated audio, LAN and IEE1394 devices and floppy drive and disabled all other choises except the SATA drive as a boot device.
    3) Next I tried with the fail-safe BIOS defaults.
    4) Cleared CMOS.
    5) Changed OnChip SATA type from Native IDE to Legacy IDE. (Only one boot attempt with the setting as Legacy.)
    6) Disabled PCI IDE BusMaster.
    7) Never touched anything in the Cell Menu: so the settings are in minimum.
    A step I have taken after the last attempt: run Windows XP hard drive error-checking tool to every logical drive with the fix option selected, and the system drive also with scan the bad sectors option selected.
    My plans next are:
    1) to install a newer Hyperion driver. If that would correct the no-unistallation-choice-bug,
    2) to disable USB-devices in the BIOS (desperate),
    3) to choose the Windows general video display driver (although I seriously doubt this is a display driver problem!).
    4) to uninstall the Anti-Virus software (Avira Antivir).
    I've read a numerous Web pages so far about the 0x0000007B stop error. Here are some links:
    Quote
    http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/support/knowledge_base/
    Stop 0x0000007B or INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE
    This Stop message, also known as Stop 0x7B, indicates that Windows XP Professional lost access to the system volume or boot volume during the startup process. This error always occurs while the system is starting and is often caused by one of the following:
        * Hardware problems
        * Corrupted or incompatible storage drivers
        * File system problems
        * Boot sector viruses
        * Outdated firmware
    During I/O system initialization, this error can occur when:
        * The controller or driver for the startup device (typically the hard disk) failed to initialize the necessary hardware.
        * File system initialization failed because the system did not recognize the data on the boot device.
    Quote
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314082
    You receive a Stop 0x0000007B error after you move the Windows XP system disk to another computer
    SYMPTOMS
    After you move the Microsoft Windows XP system (boot) disk to a backup computer, you may receive the following Stop error when you try to start the Windows XP-based backup computer:
    STOP: 0x0000007B (0xF741B84C,0xC0000034,0x00000000,0x00000000)
    CAUSE
    This error may occur if the registry entries and the drivers for the mass storage controller hardware in the backup computer are not installed in Windows XP.
    RESOLUTION
    To resolve this error, use the same hardware for the backup computer.
    Heh, heh! Very nice Microsoft, but I plan to update my computer, so I NEED to use different components
    Quote
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324103
    Device Driver Issues
    You may receive a "Stop 0x0000007B" error message in the following scenarios:
    •   A device driver that the computer boot controller needs is not configured to start during the startup process.
    •   A device driver that the computer boot controller needs is corrupted.
    •   Information in the Windows XP registry (information related to how the device drivers load during startup) is corrupted.
    Hardware Issues
    You may receive a "Stop 0x0000007B" error message if there is a resource conflict between the boot controller and another controller or between SCSI devices. You may also receive this Stop error message if drive translation is not being performed or if drive translation was changed. To troubleshoot this issue:
    1.   If an IRQ or I/O port address conflict exists between the boot controller and another controller, Windows XP either stops responding (hangs) or displays a "Stop 0x0000007B" error message. If you recently added new hardware, remove the new hardware or reconfigure it so that it does not conflict with the resources of any other installed controllers.
    2.   If you are using a SCSI hard disk, check the SCSI chain for correct termination. Remove any unused SCSI devices or make sure that each SCSI ID is unique.
    3.   Make sure that drive translation is turned on (if it is required) and that it has not been changed. For example, if you recently switched controllers, this issue may occur. For additional information about this issue, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: 314082.
    Quote
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316401/
    SYMPTOMS
    When you start your Microsoft Windows XP-based computer after you replace the motherboard on the computer, you may receive a Stop error message that is similar to the following:
    STOP 0x0000007B INACCESSABLE_BOOT_DEVICE
    CAUSE
    This issue may occur if the new motherboard contains an embedded IDE controller that has a different chipset than the original motherboard.
    RESOLUTION
    Method 1: Perform an in-place upgrade of Windows XP [<- That means repair installation of Windows XP]
    •   Do not use a repair or in-place upgrade if you suspect disk problems.
    Method 2: Repartition and format your hard disk and reinstall Windows XP

    Alright I got the situation over.
    Quote from: Roskaposti on 19-May-07, 04:44:59
    My plans next are:
    1) to install a newer Hyperion driver. If that would correct the no-unistallation-choice-bug,
    2) to disable USB-devices in the BIOS (desperate),
    3) to choose the Windows general video display driver (although I seriously doubt this is a display driver problem!).
    4) to uninstall the Anti-Virus software (Avira Antivir).
    I did try all all the above, and none of them helped.
    And by the way: after installing the new Hyperion (VIA chipset drivers), I was finally able to also uninstall. It also uninstalled the IDE SATA (I think) and PATA drivers.
    But what I had to do, was to make a REPAIR installation of Windows XP.
    So, I was wondering now afterwards: this is really, really silly. Why the hell we need to re-install Windows if we move the SYSTEM SATA drive to another computer? We don't have similar problem with parallel IDE drives. Whom should we thank here??
    The issue is to insert the driver files and the information of the ide drivers Windows should use with the next boot. How can it be this difficult?
    What you basically need is..
    - the information about the new chipset's PCIIDE.SYS/[VENDOR_PROVIDED_FILE].SYS and ATAPIIDE.SYS inserted into the values in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSetXXX\Control\CriticalDeviceDatabase
    - and the vendor's IDE drivers to the %SYSTEMROOT%/System32/drivers folder.
    Maybe something else, I don't know. But the problem was, Windows didn't know how, or what drivers to use. That can't be so big problem you need to install the whole OS anew!

  • K9A Platinum Won't load XP PRO 64

    I have a K9A Platinum board, Athlon 64 x2 4800+, 4 x 1 GB OCZ Gold ram.  The system boots up, recognizes the raid drive, starts to install Windows, I specify the driver for the raid controller, it loads it, finishes loading all the rest of the drivers, and then sits there with a blank blue screen with the text "Starting Windows"  at the bottom.
    It will not go past this point.  Any ideas?

    It has nothing to do with the board!
    But everything with the CPU and number of memory banks.
    The CPU only supports 4 banks at full speed, this is:
    2 sticks double sided (=4 banks)
    4 sticks single sided (=4 banks)
    This is a CPU limitation, not board.
    Normaly you can get it running with more then 4 banks by reducing the memory speed.

  • K9A Platinum with PCI VIA 6421A SATA Controller

    Hi everyone, I have a problem, I was using a VT6421A VIA Sata Controller with K9A Platinum FW 1.1 without any problems, I upgraded to 4 GB of RAM with Vista x64 then flashed the motherboard 1.7 firmware, mother recognizes full 4 GB of Ram. After upgrade firmware to 1.7, PCI VIA Sata controller doesn't recognizes both Pioneer 112D attached to it, before firmware update it was working perfectly.
    I'm using RAID configuration in the motherboard, could be a problem betwen the motherboard's RAID and the VIA SATA Raid controller?
    Since the upgrade to 1.7 firmware, POST doesn't show the VIA Controller menu with the attached devices, Windows Vista can see the card installed but no drives attached to it  :(
    Any help will be much appreciated!
    Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad english.

    Quote from: GrounDZero6 on 24-October-07, 03:55:41
    Thanks for your reply, can you tell me how can I enable or disable memory remapping from the Setup?
    Where can I find it in K9A Platinum? is something that looks like HW/SW Memory Mapping or how it's called that option?
    Is it possible to get a screenshot of where i can change it??
    Thanks a lot!
    "can you tell me how can I enable or disable memory remapping from the Setup?  is something that looks like HW/SW Memory Mapping or how it's called that option?"
    Yes name of option is correct, but think its not available in BIOS if im correct.
    Can you test with 2GB of memory only to see if the problem will be duplicated there too?

  • BLACK/BLANK Screen K9A Platinum

    i built my computer a few months ago, never had any problems with it until recently. I ordered a Noctua NH-U12F heat sink to instll onto my cpu, after i installed the heat sink my computer won't work. whenever i turn on my computer i just get a blank screen, nothing works now. i don't know what to do. i have not been able to get into windows or bios, a black/blank screen appears. here are my specs.
    K9A platinum
    amd x2 2.4ghz
    diamond max 1950XTX
    4gb pc6400 corsair xms2
    antec 500w psu
    antec p180 case
    if anyone has any suggestions or solutions please respond.
    thanks
    zizou10.

    Yes and be careful when you do that. You probably pulled it out of the socket when you removed the old heatsink. So, some pins may be bent or even broken off. When you remove heatsink, move it a bit over the cpu - don't lift it, just turn it gently, move it gently up and down utnil you feel that the thermal gel does not hold the cpu anymore.
    Also, be sure to clean the cpu top (old greace should be removed) and be sure to apply new thermal greace (not too much - the drop should have the size of a pin's head).

  • K9A Platinum - Periodic lock up

    Hey folks,
    New to this forum and MSI boards in general. Having an issue where my PC is locking up periodically in XP (32 bit) that I can't quite figure out. Initially after performing a fresh install of XP my machine locked up occasionally while unattended. Basically it seemed that if I walked away for 5-15 minutes, when i'd come back it would have locked up (while running windows update, for example).
    After being sure I had installed all the drivers (and updating to the latest bios) I could find for the motherboard, including AMD's dual core optimizer, this problem seemed to have been resolved - until last evening. I ran a torrent program and again, after leaving the PC unattended for a few minutes, it locked up. This happens like clockwork when using either Burst! or uTorrent.
    Any suggestions?
    Here's my hardware spec:
    MSI K9A Platinum
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Windsor 3.0GHz AM2
    OCZ Gold 2GB (1 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400)
    Seagate Barracuda ES ST3320620NS 320GB 7200 RPM SATA
    PHILIPS 20X DVD±R DVD Burner with 12X DVD-RAM
    HIS Hightech H190GT256DVN Radeon X1900GT 256MB
    Okia 450W Power Supply
    Thanks!

    Quote
    edit: Is it the number of 12V rails thats most important, or the number of amps per rail? For instance, if you have 50A, over 3 rails is that considered better than 33A over one rail?
    ONLY thing important is amps per rail! 3 rails with each 18a doesn't mean you have 54a total! They can't be simply added as the component using one rail can't use another when the used one doesn't provide enough power. That's why a strong single rail is the best to have.
    Quote
    As far as memory goes, what exactly is the 2T command rate?
    Memory setting to be found in bios "dram settings". The CMD Rate is the chipset latency, the time the chipset needs to select the ram chips.
    2T is the slower but safer setting as many AM2 systems have problems with 1T.
    Quote
    I do use the Cool 'n quiet feature and haven't tried disabling
    Well try it, if it locks up when not used this could be the source of trouble.
    Quote
    I'm running the HD in whatever default mode the SATA controller is set at
    deaden asked for raid mode as you're not using a raid setup you don't have to set anything to use SATA. Just plug and play.

  • Why no CPU support of Phenoms on K9A Platinum ?

    Hi there people,
    I know I am rather new to the board...or at least I didn't post in a long time.
    First I hope I choose the right forum for my question. If I didn't I am sorry and hope that a moderator will be so kind and move my topic accordingly.
    Now to my question, as a happy owner of a K9A Platinum board, which I had choosen last X-Mas because it was common consensus that it will be able to use Phenom cores later on since the use the same "Socket" basically apart from the memory controller and HT differences between AM2 and AM2+.
    Now it looks like MSI is not going to release a BIOS capable of supporting the new phenoms ? Or is it just they are waiting for the new steppings with the fixed TLB bug to release a BIOS for those CPUs ?
    Does anyone have more insight in this matter ? I mean I can understand MSI policy in that they want to sell K9A2 (or any other AM2+) boards but I find it rather unfair to those customers who had bought a K9A (or generally a Socket AM2 board, because K9A2 wasnt out back then when I bought it). And as other companies do show it is possible to switch the BIOS on the exact same chipsets to support Phenom cores. So why not the MSI board(s).
    See here: http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php?func=prodcpusupport&prod_no=259&maincat_no=1&cat2_no=171&cat3_no=#menu
    I am a longterm MSI customer having had MSI mainboards for years now and this is the first time I actually have a "problem". I paid 100€ for my mainboard last year and I am not willing to spend another 100€ to circle around a limitation which should be fixable with a BIOS update (see ASUS) ?
    Maybe I should reconsider my longterm customership with MSI and switch to ASUS...which I would not like as an option.
    Is there any chance that MSI will bring out a Phenom supporting BIOS ? They did bring out such BIOSes for other mainboards so why not the K9A ? Its basically the same as the K9A2 afaik ?
    Lastly I want to partly apologize for my little "rant" above...I am just at the moment so disappointed.
    Iscaran

    Quote from: Iscaran on 09-February-08, 22:04:26
    I see...however then I find it quite strange that the same chipset mainboard from ASUS for example allows for that update ?
    Do those have really differing BIOS chipsizes ? I though the BIOS is stored in a piece of hardware provided by the chipset manufacturer ?
    http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=3&l2=149&l3=624
    As you probably already realized I am no expert when it comes to BIOSes...suffice to say that I tend to know what I am doing when flashing it and I know a little about hardware in general.
    Perhaps you could elaborate further on this ?
    "Do those have really differing BIOS chipsizes ? I though the BIOS is stored in a piece of hardware provided by the chipset manufacturer ?
    http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=3&l2=149&l3=624"
    Yes that which you linked is using 8Mbit BIOS chip, while your mainboard is using 4Mbit BIOS chip.
    However:
    "I see...however then I find it quite strange that the same chipset mainboard from ASUS for example allows for that update ?"
    We don't care for other brands than MSI. Please stop link to different manufacturers.
    You can view list of Phenom Ready MSI mainboards here: https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=113759.0
    As you can see there is a budget models as well. Its the matter of BIOS capacity.

  • Help, K9A Platinum

    hi all, Ive just ordered a  K9A Platinum  and was wondering if the  OCZ DDR2 PC6400 1024MB KIT, Spec Ops Ed ,w/two 512MB PC6400 XTC, CL5-5-5-12  2.0v would work even though the mainboard says it supports 1.8v
    thanks in advance if anyone can help

    Quote from: patch1979 on 13-February-07, 23:08:22
    hi, thanks for that, was starting to think the ram I bought might not work. thanks again {cant wait for the delivery }
    let we know when you got them and the result

  • K9N2 SLi Platinum - Raid Issues

    Components:
    Enermax Pro82+ 525W
    MSI K9N2 SLi Platinum
    AMD 5400+ Black Edition
    2x2Gb SUPER*TALENT DDRII 800Mhz CL4
    MSI 8800GT 512mb
    1 X WD Blue 500Gb Sata2
    2 x WD Blue 320GB Sata2 (NEW SET)
    Basically, I've had only the 500Gb HD as the main disk, Now I've got a set of 320GB's for Raid, which i'd like to add to my current setup without Re-installing OS coz the main drive contains necessary Data etc. So I Enable the Raid settings in Bios as outlined in the Manual. Setup the raid in the Mediashield Raid Bios. Windows Vista 32 simply Bsods at the Windows loading screen, with latest MB RAID drivers from MSI & Nvidia tested, still the same.
    I've discovered in other threads, people experiencing something similar. According to what I've learnt is the best is going to have to Set the single 500Gb Drive into a stripe and re-install. I've tried other alternatives, like leaving the the 320's as single drives and setting up the raid through windows Mediashield, same problem after rebooting. Compared to My older rig, RAID seems to not work so starightforward on the K9N2. MSI should be more Specific with instructions and limitations to implementing a Raid.
    That's not my biggest problem here though, I've disconnected the 500Gb due to critical data, I've only got the 320's in Ports 1 & 2. Setup Stripe raid in Bios. I cannot succesfully install Windows Vista or XP to the raid, Vista install remains stuck @ the decompressing files window. XP loads until it's about to boot the OS for the first time then Bsods. Using latest Floppy Raid Drivers too. Has anyone with this board got a Raid with OS installed? Am i missing something here? what am I doing wrong?
    I'm still Testing, gonna pull out my Aged and beloved Hitachi 80Gb Sata1 Drive from the dead, install OS and then get this baby to work in Raid as I want it to, Hopefully......
    Will report back..

    The RAID implementation on this board is really obnoxious, if you have installed windows (XP/VISTA) prior to enabling RAID in the motherboard bios, windows will keep restarting itself at the windows load screen. Not an OS problem but the way the RAID controllers work on this motherboard.
    My raid setup:
    1 X WD 500GB BLUE (System C:\)(Single Stripe)(HAS TO BE IN IT'S OWN ARRAY IN MEDIASHIELD ROM for windows to work if RAID IS ENABLED)
    2 X WD 320GB BLUE (Raid 0)(Stripe)
    1 X LG Optical Drive (Also shows up in Mediashield post screen when Raid controller is ensbled)
    Make sure to back up all data before setting up an array, setting up a array on a single HDD and selecting NOT to delete the MBR should keep your data intact. Booting up the system with the previous installation not deleted but now with the system HDD in it's own array you will continue to get BSOD and auto reboots.
    V3.3 Bios Settings:
    1) Set 'RAID MODE' to 'RAID" within the Integrated Peripherals Menu.
    2)Enable 'RAID' in the Sub-Menu "ON-CHIP ATA DEVICES" --> RIAD MODE set to RAID then enable the ports you want Raid enabled on. SATA 1.2.3.4 are NV raid 5.6 are JMICRON. I have have ports 1,2,3 & 4 enabled as all 4 of my drives are connected to those ports. Optical drives will automatically show up in Mediashield ROM post screen even if port is disabled, and once windows is reinstalled other HDD'S can be connected without having to enable raid or arrays and all will be seen as normal.
    Now to install windows, had an issue with the Floppy raid drivers from MSI site so I used the MCP78 floppy from gigabyte
    http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Support/Motherboard/Driver_Model.aspx?ProductID=2819. Windows working and Raid 0 on 2X 320GB HDD. Once windows is installed to a single disk in this manner windows will work fine with sata raid disabled (deleting array in mediashield will delete MBR) and in IDE mode as but when raid is re-enabled it will detect the disk and work fine too. Another issue unresolved is that I couldn't successfully install to the Raid 0-2X WD 320gb blue stripe, anybody got windows installed successfully to a Raid 0-2X hdd stripe? Note, If installing to Jmicron you will need JM drivers.
    Another issue I have since using Raid is that S3 mode is not working well at all. S3 is enabled in Bios power management and definitely worked previously when raid was disabled. Now I cannot get S3 suspend. When i choose sleep it goes into Hibernation, checked all vista settings in power management and it should go to sleep not hibernate. Any Help? When it comes out of sleep all the lights are red and I have to power it down, turn power supply off/on then post-> 'windows resuming' then only does it come out of hibernation, strange... Whether I choose sleep or hibernate this is what I'm getting. Using Vista 32, Nvidia driver version 15.24, display driver version 180.48. Jmicron drivers installed as well.
    Components:
    Enermax Pro82+ 525W
    MSI K9N2 SLi Platinum
    AMD 5400+ Black Edition
    2x2Gb SUPER*TALENT DDRII 800Mhz CL4
    2x1Gb SUPER*TALENT DDRII 800Mhz CL4
    MSI 8800GT OC 512mb
    1 X WD Blue 500Gb Sata2
    2 x WD Blue 320GB Sata2 (NEW SET)
    1 X LG Dvd-Rw 
    Hope this helps & thanks in advance.

  • MSI k9a Platinum + PowerColor 1950 pro extreme + bios v1.6

    Hello!  At motherboard stood version firmware v1.4 Run test 3DMark2005 and received 10,444 importance to my configuration (which is a good figure). Then Live Update pointed out that there are newer BIOS v1.6, I flash. Then began receiving in 7048 3DMark2005  :( Tried to reinvent the windows XP, set new driver, not helped, Clear CMOS. ReFlash to version v1.3 (why not found on the website version v1.4), and miracle! 3DMark2005 shows 10456  . It can be concluded to reduce speed blame new BIOS. So do not recommend placing Edition v1.4 above.
     Sorry for my English. I used a translator from GOOGLE 
    AMD 5200+ windsor
    MSI k9a platinum
    PowerColor X1950 PRO Extreme 256MB
    DDR-2 1Gb 800 Elixir *2
    Western Digital Serial ATA II (WD3200AAJS) - 8Mb, 7200rpm
    Chieftec LBX-02BBSL 450W

    Here we go AGAIN, I will explain this AGAIN ....... 
    Do not flash the bios if there aren't any problems!
    Flashing the bios is only usefull if you experience compatibility problems between certain hardware devices in your pc. So, leave the bios alone!
    A BIOS IS NOT A DRIVER!
    And, like it is with drivers, newer is not always better! Some driver/bios are meant only for newer hardwaremodels.
    LEAVE IT ALONE, UNLESS YOU ABSOLUTELY NEED TO MESS WITH IT.
    So, Foxyrus, lesser points in 3DMark was completely your own fault, not MSI's. Telling people not to use the 1.6 bios is nonsense. In your case it did not work, but for some folks it probably will work.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to make a good balance in different  browser

    Tt is hard to make a perfet website in different browser,  many times it is beautiful in firefox , but ugly in IE. Do anyone have tips to make a balance in different browser?

  • How do I restore data from recovered hard drive?

    In a nutshell- Hard drive failed. We had it replaced, and recovered data from old hard drive, put it on an external hard drive. Now we want to put that data onto the new hard drive. Is it as simple as dragging it over? We're missing most of the softw

  • Regarding oracle 10g express edition login problem

    Hi all, This morning, i downloaded 10g oracle express editon from oracle.com.. I installed sucessfully. i am able to login from the command line sucessfully.. But when i am clicking on Goto database home page it is connecting http://127.0.0.1:8080/ap

  • Running WD Application : SLD Connectivity Error

    Hi Friends, I developed a Web Dynpro Application using the R/3 Backend in SAP Netweaver Developer Studio and deployed it. When i run the Application i get the following error. Refer the error stack trace below : I am new to WAS administration.Can any

  • Applet Security (cant write to local drive)

    Hi, I am developing a simple applet on a local machine and I want this applet to have the ability to a file somewhere on the local hard drive. I've added the code to write to a file data.txt, when the code executes I get the exception error: com.ms.s