K9A - Windows XP Patch Install Problem

New PC :
MSI K9A Mainboard
AMD X2 5200+ AM2
2 GB RAM MDT 800
WD SATA 320 GB
650 W Bequiet
ATI 1950 XTX
1. installed Windows - after it SP2
2. All Driver Mainboard Graphics sound etc.
3. System runs find
Now online Windows updates - about 68 Patches
- Ok download
Install all - reboot ! Now I see the Windows load bar and
then after 30 sec the screen turned black and reboot automatically
Tried it a few times - nothing happens - reboot all times
The Last well-known function: same - black reboot.
I thought the first time it would be because of software, which we installed but the second time we installed windows only with SP2 and drivers SP2 and then the Patches - we got the same phenomenon
Now we selected simply the first 7 Patches - Same phenomenon….
Any ideas ?

Quote from: Dormelchen on 09-February-07, 22:27:17
i want to destroy something
Get a stress Ball it helps me
Also check hard drive for errors or bad sectors

Similar Messages

Lvrt2009f2 patch install problem

I unable to install the LabVIEW 2009 Real Time Module f2 patch. My setup currently includes LabVIEW 2009 with the Real Time and FPGA modules. I already have the LabVIEW 2009f3 patch installed.
It is my understanding from another thread here that the lvrt2009f2 patch in not included in the lv2009f3 patch.
I downloaded and attempted to install lvrt2009f2. Unfortunately, the installer tells me it is unable to install NI-MAX 4.3 because I already have a newer version. I have NI-MAX 4.6.2. At that point, the only options are Back and Cancel. The Next button is grayed out.
Anyone else have this problem or a suggestion?
Thank you
Bill
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Grant,
Thanks for the response to my post. I attached a screenshot as you requested.
You didn't ask, but here is some more information that may be useful:
Before I get the unable to install message, I have the option of allowing the installer look for update notifications from NI. It does not matter if I allow this to happen. I get to the sampe point.
I am trying to install this on a laptop running Windows 7. I do all my work on this laptop. It was new a little over a month ago. In early January I did a fresh install of the NI Developer Suite from the 4th Quarter 2009 DVDs.
My old laptop is around here somewhere. It has Windows XP. I was considering doing a fresh install on there just to see if I get to the same point.
Thanks
Bill
Attachments:
lvrt2009f2_installer.jpg ‏43 KB

Lenovo D20, Type 4155-21G With 5x1.5tb Raid 5, Windows 7 64bit install problem.

H
Id like to just document a current machine and works and see if any thing is glaringly wrong..
Above spec machine has an onboard marrvel 66xx raid card, a raid 5 volume has been created, total useable space is around 5.5TB.
The software in play here is the following..
Orignal Lenovo recovery disk set, this is Rescue and recovery boot disk 1, then the OS which is Vista 32 Business, the disk label is actual 64bit but its not 64bit its 32bit.
The machine finally has to leave with Windows 7 64bit ultimate.
I have looked into the upgrade paths and so on and basicly you need vista 64bit ultimate in theory, certain hacks are possible such as renaming the os level or name via the registery, but this is dirverting from my post.
Here is what has been done and what has happend.
20th Jan.
Start of day.
Raid 5 volume created.
Factory recovery completed windows vista business 32bit.
Attempt to upgrade Windows vista business to Windows 7 ultimate from with in windows, windows 7 alerts this is not a compatable system etc.
At this stage since the 64bit upgrade is not possible from the known good lenovo state (lenovo vista business factory desktop etc) the second disks in the "Windows 7 32bit + 64bit any time upgrade package was ran.
The 32bit version of the Windows 7 ultimate was ran, this did complete sucessfully.
The 64bit version of the windows 7 was attempted once more from with in the newly installed Windows 7 32 bit but again this upgrade route is not supported.
At this stage a custom install was completed (which means a fresh install which wipes the drive) / fresh install, of the windows 7 64bit any time upgrade disk.
For some reason the Windows 7 64bit any time upgrade key failed to be accepted.
At this stage a second engineer repeated all steps completed to verify and on the second go around the FRESH install of Windows 64bit any time upgrade (stand alone install / custom etc) the key worked!..
This is were it gets interesting.
Lets recap, we have a D20 with 5x1.5tb sata hard drives in raid 5, all on the onboard marvel raid card.
Windows 7 64bit has been sucessfully installed, and of course the next step is to install the lenovo system update tool. (version for windows 7, I understand this is fully 64bit compatable..)
This was completed and pc doctor and one other misc application install, the system requested to restart and then ....
The raid BIOS of the marvel card reported that the raid had become degraded..!!
An inspection of the onboard raid information results that the disk 0 of the 5 disks, was no longer assigned to the RAID 5, with teh remaining several disks still "assigned".
At this stage the only option is to delete the raid five array and recreate it.
This has been done and the factory recovery process has once again been restarted and an attempt will be made to perform the custom install with hopefully the windows 7 64bit any time upgrade install detecting the previous version although I would say that it would not need to detect anything since this is now longer an upgrade but a custom fresh install.
Further information.
There is a System bios update from the 5th of Jan 2010, this has been burnt to cd and will be applyed against the machine shortly.
We have had some conversation about just how it is that a disk can fatally pop out from the raid five volume like this, was it a coincidence that it coninsided with the power cycle process dirrectly after the system update installation?
Tommorow a Windows 64bit OEM package will be applied against this machine and since we have the relivant driver file for the onboard raid card (sourced from the drivers and applications lenovo recovery disk set), there should be less of a problem in key acceptance.
Kind of a werid situation, what looks like a possible hardware problem and a stupid microsoft upgrade qulification problem.
Is there any thing stupid I have over looked?
Thanks, sorry for the long post but this is the story in full.
Note from Moderator: Fixed formatting issue.

21st Jan..
The D20 has sucessfully had vista business factory reinstalled and then Windows 7 64bit installed.
Dirrectly after the Windows 7 installation and power cycle, one of the five 1.5tb hard drives have dropped out of the raid, visable as "DEGRADED", uppon further inspection via control m, the middle drive (not drive 0 as before) drive 2 (0,1,2,3,4,5) has dropped out and is not marked as assigned, it is marked with no label or free.
This is high strangeness, it is my understanding that the RAID technologies are transparent to the OS so it should not be in any way the Windows 7 install triggering this, the last occurance was also during a Windows 7 power cycle but dirrectly after the system update tool being installed.
At this stage it would appear that Windows 7 64-bit used in conjunction with the supplment driver disk marked as (drivers and apps, windows xp vista, windows 7) is not able to complete and remain stable.
I suspect a possible driver issue but if this was the case surely the windows 7 install would not progress past the first installation point where the driver disks is required to actually use and see the array via the controler.
I will update this thread with more information as it becomes available.
Machine delivery eta to customer is tommorow so this is not good.

Patch install problem in Solaris 10

{color:#3366ff}Hi , I am trying to install patch 125100-10 to meet the requirement of our application system.But there seems something wrong. {color}
bash-3.00# showrev -p | grep {color:#ff0000}125100{color}
Patch: 120011-14 Obsoletes: 116781-02, 117447-01, 117463-05, 118371-10, 118373-01, 118564-03, 118731-01, 118879-02, 118890-03, 118925-05, 118929-05, 119012-03, 119073-03, 119077-10, 119265-02, 119332-01, 119336-01, 119573-02, 119580-05, 119586-02, 119593-01, 119685-11, 119824-02, 119826-02, 119981-09, 119985-02, 119998-02, 120023-01, 120032-04, 120048-03, 120050-06, 120469-07, 120473-12, 120629-08, 120780-04, 120809-01, 120824-09, 120845-05, 120990-02, 120998-02, 121006-02, 121010-06, 121215-01, 121229-02, 121235-01, 121278-01, 121282-02, 121284-02, 121288-03, 121292-01, 121294-01, 121406-01, 121473-01, 121474-01, 121476-01, 121478-01, 121786-01, 121905-01, 122251-01, 122328-01, 122404-01, 122412-01, 122513-02, 122535-01, 122637-01, 122646-02, 122658-04, 122660-10, 122662-05, 122752-04, 123017-01, 123249-02, 123256-02, 123324-03, 123330-01, 123350-01, 123354-03, 123356-02, 123362-01, 123418-02, 123420-02, 123422-03, 123441-05, 123444-01, 123910-03, 123911-01, 123916-05, 123954-01, 124204-04, 124208-01, 124250-03, 124254-04, 124258-07, 124280-01, 124286-01, 124327-04, 124442-01, 124916-03, 124918-02, 124921-02, 124922-03, 124987-02, 124990-01, 124993-01, 124995-01, 125009-01, 125011-01, 125014-03, 125018-02, 125020-01, 125024-01, 125026-01, 125028-03, 125035-01, 125040-01, 125042-02, 125073-01, 125077-03, 125079-01, {color:#ff0000}125100-10{color}, 125112-01, 125114-01, 125116-02, 125118-01, 125120-03, 125123-01, 125127-01, 125129-01, 125198-02, 125203-01, 125329-03, 125363-06, 125371-01, 125383-01, 125385-02, 125420-01, 125422-01, 125424-01, 125427-01, 125430-01, 125432-01, 125465-02, 125478-01, 125486-01, 125488-02, 125492-01, 125494-02, 125497-01, 125792-01, 125795-01, 126255-01, 126303-02, 126310-01, 126320-01, 126429-01, 126536-01, 126663-01, 126838-01 Requires: 118833-36, 118918-24, 119042-09, 119254-42, 119574-02, 119578-30, 120272-12, 120900-04, 121133-02, 121901-01, 122640-05, 125369-05, 125503-02, 125547-01, 126419-01, 126897-02 Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu, SUNWcsr, SUNWcsl, SUNWcnetr, SUNWkvm, SUNWcar, SUNWcakr, SUNWckr, SUNWcsd, SUNWcpcu, SUNWfmd, SUNWperl584core, SUNWperl584usr, SUNWesu, SUNWkrbu, SUNWmdb, SUNWmdbr, SUNWtoo, SUNWpiclu, SUNWcslr, SUNWaudit, SUNWib, SUNWusb, SUNWtavor, SUNWudapltu, SUNWudapltr, SUNWzfskr, SUNWzfsr, SUNWsmapi, SUNWzfsu, SUNWdoc, SUNWuksp, SUNWopenssl-libraries, SUNWwbsup, SUNWses, SUNWssad, SUNWuprl, SUNWusbu, SUNWmdr, SUNWmdu, SUNWintgige, SUNWipfh, SUNWipfr, SUNWipfu, SUNWnfsckr, SUNWnfscu, SUNWvolu, SUNWpapi, SUNWippcore, SUNWipplr, SUNWipplu, SUNWrcmdc, SUNWscpu, SUNWbcp, SUNWxcu4, SUNWxge, SUNWixgb, SUNWpl5u, SUNWbtool, SUNWarc, SUNWarcr, SUNWnfssu, SUNWdhcsu, SUNWdhcm, SUNWpmu, SUNWdmgtu, SUNWnisu, SUNWypu, SUNWzoner, SUNWatfsu, SUNWpoolr, SUNWpool, SUNWtecla, SUNWzoneu, SUNWauda, SUNWaudh, SUNWbart, SUNWcpc, SUNWcpr, SUNWpppdu, SUNWfruip, SUNWdtrc, SUNWkdcu, SUNWkey, SUNWpcu, SUNWppm, SUNWpsu, SUNWdfbh, SUNWlibsasl, SUNWlldap, SUNWdtrp, SUNWerid, SUNWhea, SUNWfss, SUNWsadmi, SUNWftdur, SUNWftduu, SUNWncar, SUNWntpu, SUNWrcapr, SUNWopenssl-include, SUNWpsm-lpd, SUNWqos, SUNWrcapu, SUNWrge, SUNWroute, SUNWslpu, SUNWsndmr, SUNWsndmu, SUNWsra, SUNWsshcu, SUNWsshdu, SUNWsshu
{color:#3366ff}From the above information, it tells me, the 125100-10 is an old one and is replaced by 120011-14.
First, I downlaod the patch and unpack it under /var/tmp
bash-3.00# patchadd 125100-10
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Version of package SUNWcakr from directory SUNWcakr.v in patch 125100-10 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWcakr from directory SUNWcakr.us in patch 125100-10 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWkvm from directory SUNWkvm.us in patch 125100-10 differs from the package installed on the system.
Done!
The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
Package SUNWdcsr from directory SUNWdcsr in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdcsr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdcsu from directory SUNWdcsu in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdcsu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdrcr from directory SUNWdrcr.u in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdrcr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdrr from directory SUNWdrr.u in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdrr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdscpr from directory SUNWdscpr.u in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdscpr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWefc from directory SUNWefc.u in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWefc will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWefcl from directory SUNWefcl in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWefcl will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWsckmr from directory SUNWsckmr in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsckmr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdrr from directory SUNWdrr.us in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdrr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWefc from directory SUNWefc.us in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWefc will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVcpcu from directory FJSVcpcu in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVcpcu will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVhea from directory FJSVhea in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVhea will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVmdb from directory FJSVmdb in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVmdb will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVmdbr from directory FJSVmdbr in patch 125100-10 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVmdbr will not be applied to the system.
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
{color}
{color:#000000}
The following requested patches will not be installed because
they have been made obsolete by other patches already
installed on the system or by patches you have specified for installation.
0 All packages from patch 125100-10 are patched by higher revision patches.
{color}
No patches to install.
{color:#000000}
{color}{color:#3366ff}Then I tried to install the new patch 120011-14 {color}
{color:#000000}
bash-3.00# patchadd 120011-14
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Version of package SUNWcakr from directory SUNWcakr.v in patch 120011-14 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWcar from directory SUNWcar.v in patch 120011-14 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWcpc from directory SUNWcpc.v in patch 120011-14 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWkvm from directory SUNWkvm.v in patch 120011-14 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWcakr from directory SUNWcakr.us in patch 120011-14 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWcar from directory SUNWcar.us in patch 120011-14 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWcpc from directory SUNWcpc.us in patch 120011-14 differs from the package installed on the system.
Version of package SUNWkvm from directory SUNWkvm.us in patch 120011-14 differs from the package installed on the system.
Done!
The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
Package SUNWcart200 from directory SUNWcart200.v in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWcart200 will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWcti2 from directory SUNWcti2.u in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWcti2 will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdcsr from directory SUNWdcsr in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdcsr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdcsu from directory SUNWdcsu in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdcsu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdrcr from directory SUNWdrcr.u in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdrcr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdrr from directory SUNWdrr.u in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdrr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdscpr from directory SUNWdscpr.u in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdscpr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWefc from directory SUNWefc.u in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWefc will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWefcl from directory SUNWefcl in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWefcl will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWefcr from directory SUNWefcr in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWefcr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWidn from directory SUNWidn.u in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWidn will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWiopc from directory SUNWiopc.v in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWiopc will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWkvmt200 from directory SUNWkvmt200.v in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWkvmt200 will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWldomr from directory SUNWldomr.v in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWldomr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWldomu from directory SUNWldomu.v in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWldomu will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWpcmci from directory SUNWpcmci in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpcmci will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWsckmr from directory SUNWsckmr in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsckmr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWus from directory SUNWus.u in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWus will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWust1 from directory SUNWust1.v in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWust1 will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWwrsm from directory SUNWwrsm.u in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWwrsm will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWdrr from directory SUNWdrr.us in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWdrr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWefc from directory SUNWefc.us in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWefc will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVcpcu from directory FJSVcpcu in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVcpcu will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVhea from directory FJSVhea in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVhea will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVmdb from directory FJSVmdb in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVmdb will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVmdbr from directory FJSVmdbr in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVmdbr will not be applied to the system.
Package FJSVpiclu from directory FJSVpiclu in patch 120011-14 is not installed on the system. Changes for package FJSVpiclu will not be applied to the system.
The following requested patches are already installed on the system
Requested to install patch 120011-14 is already installed on the system.
No patches to check dependency.
{color}
{color:#000000}
{color}
{color:#3366ff}
I really confused by the information given by the system.Anyone can help me with it. Thanks{color}
Edited by: hubery on Jul 6, 2008 5:04 PM

Patch 120011-14, which obsoletes patch 125100-10, is already installed on your system. Most likely no more actions needed from your side. If your software requires exactly patch 125100-10 and is not compatible with its successor, then you can try remove patch 120011-14.

OBIEE 11g 11.1.1.6.0 to upper version Patch install problem

Hi
when am trying install the patch for obiee11g 11.1.1.6.0 to upper version i facing this problem
OPatch Version : 11.1.0.9.0
OUI Version : 11.2.0.1.0
The OUI version is not applicable for current OPatch version.
OPatch failed with error code = 1
i saw this blog http://obieelive.blogspot.in/2012/07/obiee-111161-patch-from-111160-in.html
am not under stand what the purpose of Oracle_home is it related to DB or OBI Application?
what is purpose of ORACLE_HOME VARIABLE?
any one guide me for installation OBIEE11g to upper version and how to install the patchs step by step
Regards
Leela Krishna

995847 wrote:
Hi
when am trying install the patch for obiee11g 11.1.1.6.0 to upper version i facing this problem
OPatch Version : 11.1.0.9.0_
*> OUI Version : 11.2.0.1.0*
The OUI version is not applicable for current OPatch version.
OPatch failed with error code = 1
i saw this blog http://obieelive.blogspot.in/2012/07/obiee-111161-patch-from-111160-in.html
am not under stand what the purpose of Oracle_home is it related to DB or OBI Application?
what is purpose of ORACLE_HOME VARIABLE?
any one guide me for installation OBIEE11g to upper version and how to install the patchs step by step
Regards
Leela KrishnaOpatch should be higher than OUI version.. Your OPatch is outdated that's why you are receiving the above error
you need to download the latest OPatch by searching http://support.oracle.com for 'How To Download And Install The Latest OPatch Version [ID 274526.1]'
After which you can start with the Patching of OBIEE.
http://www.askjohnobiee.com/2012/10/how-to-apply-obiee-11g-bundle-patch-set.html
Please mark helpful/correct
Thanks,
RM

Indesign 8.0.2 Patch install problems

I have Indesign 8.0 installed on a machine that is not allowed to touch any networks. I tried to install the 8.0.2 patch on it today and the installer told me the patch was not applicable. I have gone out to the downloads section to verify that I was getting the right patch. After checking I redownload the patch (had it right the first time) and it still wont install.
Please I need some help here.

Piemar wrote:
Also as stated in the original post this is a stand alone machine that cannot touch teh outside network. I can only sneaker net the patches onto it.
In that case you must be running windows.
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4773

OCS Windows Single Box Install problem

When installing the 9iAS Infrastructure portion of the single-tier install on Windows, we're seeing that the DBCA for the Infrastructure database will hang as soon as it starts. Any ideas why?
Originally, we thought that the problem lied with multiple CPUs, but we found an article to force a single-CPU install, and it went fine. Note that the Information Storage DBCA ran fine earlier in the install.
Thanks!

Another possibility if you're not running Windows 2000 Advanced Server... Windows splits available memory half and half toward kernel and user processes.
That means, if you have a 1G server, only 500M is available for OCS.
If you have a 2G server, only 1G is available for user processes.
Advanced Server lets you add a /3GB switch in the boot.ini file, check Metalink. That splits 4G into 3G for user processes and 1G for the kernel.
I ran into a similar problem as you describe on my XP Pro PC at home, I have 1G of RAM but DBCA fails (protocol error), then when it backs out of the installation for the DBCA components it also wipes out the database service.
I didn't check whether it also wipes out the oradata files, it may do that if installation of a database is unsuccessful.
I may try grabbing copies of those, the init.ora file, and back out of the ocs store db installation, then rebuild manually, test, and retry the other components.
It would be nice if we could do this step manually.
I am so desperate to make the singlebox install work that I am going to try the /3GB switch on my PC when I go home tonight... If that doesn't work I have RHAS 2.1 coming in the mail soon, I ordered it last week.

Windows Server 2012R2 Install problems

I am trying to install Server 2012 R2 on a Dell Power Edge 830 with 8 GB of RAM and 2 RAID 1 arrays #1 = 374 and #2 = 474. When I boot with the DVD in the drive it goes thru the normal stuff then it comes up with a Windows boot manager error "Windows
failed to start. A recent hardware or software change might be the cause" Then it lists the normal fixes "File: \windows\system32\config\system" "Status: 0xc0000001. Then it says hit enter for OS selection when you proceed it then brings
up only one choice of operating systems "Windows Setup [EMS Enabled]" or press F8 for advanced options but when you press F8 it just takes you back to the same error screen and if you select the Windows setup option it then takes you back to the
same error screen. I understand that I probably need to disable driver signature but I'm not sure how to do that with F8 not working any ideas?

I had a similar issue with my r940, it has to do with the dvd drive I finally got it to install by faking it, I removed the hard drive and put into another computer that would boot from DVD it was a desktop computer did the install up to the
first reboot, when it requests the first reboot it hasn't really done anything except initialize the disk and install the OS image form the DVD. So remove the drive and put in the 830 server and boot and complete the OS install. it will do all the hardware
detection after the boot.

Qosmio X500-106 - Windows 7 clean install problems

Hi
Recently purchased a Toshiba X500-106
and it came with Windows 7 Home Premium,
I purchased Windows 7 Ultimate as I wanted to use
Bit-Locker.
When I installed Windows 7 Ultimate OS I started my Laptop up and found that all original software was gone.
Of course, but Now the screen is dark and the Graphics aren't right as I tried to run Solitaire and it said "Graphics not hardware accelerated".
I then checked my system rating and found that My graphics was rated as "1.0"; and I can't watch any DVDs or blu-ray films, I keep trying to find a way to change the video setting but to no avail!
Is it worth me restoring the HDD to Factory Spec?
I'm not happy that it just looks bad, do I need the original software to change the settings?
I've installed all relevant divers and software from NVIDIA and Toshiba but it's not working!
What is my best option? Clean install again?
Restore HDD to factory spec?
Any help massively appreciated

Interestingly I have install Windows7 Ultimate from an upgrade (not a clean install) on my X500-02M. Now it enjoys nothing better than loocking up every 20 or 30 minutes. I have made sure there are no viruses and run "Registery Patrol" on the computer but it is still very unstable. It also is actually more unstable doing simple things like doing word docs, project programs & emails than if running a game.
So while I have all my Toshiba software my Qosmio runs like a dog.
Toshiba suggested (no surprise here) resetting the system. Seems to me an easy answer but this is not the 1st X500 02M that has done this the first became so bad it is now back with its makers. The system seems to be inherantly unstable (much like some of the old satelites but without the blue screen of death)
While I do recomend going back to the original Toshiba software (notebooks are like that) I do not recoment getting a Windows 7 ultimate upgrade pack until Toshiba makes it as the standard one seems not to work too well.
Regards

Treo650 Windows 7 sync install problems

I just got a used Treo 650 to replace my 600 which died.
My PC is running windows 7
I use Outlook 2003
Palm Desktop v4.1.4 that came with the treo works fine with outlook but the quickinstall won't work. It refuses to even run.
I upgraded to Desktop v6.2.2 That one allows me to install stuff (I think) but it won't talk to outlook.
Is there a way to go back to desktop 4.1.4 and install software etc on the treo via some other means.
Post relates to: Treo 650 (Unlocked GSM)

Interestingly I have install Windows7 Ultimate from an upgrade (not a clean install) on my X500-02M. Now it enjoys nothing better than loocking up every 20 or 30 minutes. I have made sure there are no viruses and run "Registery Patrol" on the computer but it is still very unstable. It also is actually more unstable doing simple things like doing word docs, project programs & emails than if running a game.
So while I have all my Toshiba software my Qosmio runs like a dog.
Toshiba suggested (no surprise here) resetting the system. Seems to me an easy answer but this is not the 1st X500 02M that has done this the first became so bad it is now back with its makers. The system seems to be inherantly unstable (much like some of the old satelites but without the blue screen of death)
While I do recomend going back to the original Toshiba software (notebooks are like that) I do not recoment getting a Windows 7 ultimate upgrade pack until Toshiba makes it as the standard one seems not to work too well.
Regards

Toshiba Satellite L305-S5883 Windows 7 clean install problem

I just got a new 500gb Seagate HDD (yuck, but they were on sale). I try to do a fresh install of windows 7 with the drive plugged in and it gets to unpacking 1% and then has an error and wont detect the hard drive until I restart the laptop. I figure that I got a bad hard drive or windows disk so I try another windows disk and the same thing. So I figure ill try the hard drive in another system. I pop it in with the first disk and it installs fine. I don't really know what would cause this, the toshiba has the latest bios. On another note I also tried XP install disk and that didnt even see a hard drive.

I suspect it's a variation of this situation.
The RTM version of Windows 7's installation package does not handle the new advanced-format drives.
“Windows Setup could not configure Windows on this computer’s hardware” installation error on a Wind...
-Jerry

106409-01 patch install problem

I am trying to install iPlanet iPortal 3.0 on SUN Ultra 1 which has
Solaris 2.6. And I get the following error:
WARNING: patch 106409-01 is recommended/required for
JDK 1.2.2 on SunOS 5.6
Required/recommended patch(es) not found. Said patches may
or may not apply to your system. Only continue if you are
sure they do not apply. Test this by attempting to install
them. Please see the iPlanet Portal Server Release Notes
for information regarding downloading the patches.
Abort installation? [y]/n
I abort the installation and go to the patches section and when I tried
to install the patch and I get the following:
Checking installed patches...
One or more patch packages included in
106409-01 are not installed on this system.
Patchadd is terminating.
Need help/suggetions on this issue
Bharni

Bharni,
This patch is only needed if you need traditional Chinese TrueType fonts.
If this is not an issue in your particular portal installation you can
choose to continue the installation of iPS 3.0. If you would like more
details on this patch go http://sunsolve.sun.com, click on the link
Patchfinder, and type in the patch id 106409-01.
Charles
Bharanendra wrote:
I am trying to install iPlanet iPortal 3.0 on SUN Ultra 1 which has
Solaris 2.6. And I get the following error:
WARNING: patch 106409-01 is recommended/required for
JDK 1.2.2 on SunOS 5.6
Required/recommended patch(es) not found. Said patches may
or may not apply to your system. Only continue if you are
sure they do not apply. Test this by attempting to install
them. Please see the iPlanet Portal Server Release Notes
for information regarding downloading the patches.
Abort installation? [y]/n
I abort the installation and go to the patches section and when I tried
to install the patch and I get the following:
Checking installed patches...
One or more patch packages included in
106409-01 are not installed on this system.
Patchadd is terminating.
Need help/suggetions on this issue
Bharni

DST Patch Install Error

Hi everyone, can someone please help me troubleshoot the patch install problem. I am getting the following error when installing the DST patch on solaris 5.8
# patchadd /var/spool/patch/109809-05
Patch directory /var/spool/patch/109809-05 does not exist.
Usage: patchadd [-u] [-d] [-B <backout_dir>]
[-S <service> | -R <client_root_path>]
[-C <net_install_image>] <patch>
patchadd [-u] [-d] [-B <backout_dir>]
[-S <service> | -R <client_root_path>]
[-C <net_install_image>]
-M patch_dir patch_id... | patch_dir patch_list
patchadd [-S <service> | -R <client_root_path>]
[-C <net_install_image>] -p
Patchadd is terminating.

Hi everyone, can someone please help me troubleshoot
the patch install problem. I am getting the
following error when installing the DST patch on
solaris 5.8
# patchadd /var/spool/patch/109809-05Any reason you chose that location?
Patch directory /var/spool/patch/109809-05 does not
exist.
Does it exist? What's inside that directory?
Darren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have tried with different directories as well but same error message. /var/spool/patch directory has nothing in it except the patches file.
Thanks for you help

I get an error message when trying to install windows 7 on my macbook pro. The message says "windows has encountered a problem communicating with a device connected to your computer. I don't have anything connected to my computer. How do I fix this?

I'm trying to install windows 7 on my macbook pro. I went through the process of bootcamp telling it to install windows 7. Once the windows boot manager started an error message came up. The error message says " windows has encountered a problem communicating with a device connected to your computer. I don't have a usb connected to my computer. I am using windows 7 professional install disc. I can't figure out what i am doing wrong. The same message keeps coming up over and over. Am I doing something wrong or is it something else?

Well, shucks, i just spent almost 30 minutes trying to find your model user guide to explain it better, I guess they never got around to making it.....
I would just borrow another Windows disk and try installing it again and if it does it again then you might take it to an Apple Store and see if one of the "Genius' " can figure it out.
Make sure your internet is enabled and click on your blank desktop and at the top of your screen is a Help menu option, enter PRAM and it should give you a list of things relating to Pram. It may take a few seconds to list anything as it has to connect to Apples severs first. It should list the things you may have to fill back in when your done.
"P-ram" stores some common information that is used in the background, your date, time, startup disk, etc, that you don't have to re-fill when you restart, it's a little different for each computer.

I got a new lenovo desktop windows 8.1,installed itunes and synced my ihone 4 no problems. then i imported a cd of songs which showed up in recently added but not in main library ,therefore it did not sync to the iphone. how can i get new songs to ap

i got a new lenovo desktop windows 8.1,installed itunes and synced my iphone 4 no problems. then i imported a cd of songs which showed up in recently added but not in main library ,therefore it did not sync to the iphone. how can i get new songs to appear in the main library and sync properly
thanks
john

Check the songs are really not in the Music section of the library by clicking the magnifying glass in the search box and unticking Search Entire Library if it is ticked, then typing in the name of the album. If the tracks still don't show try closing iTunes and deleting a hidden file called sentinel from inside your iTunes folder. This should make iTunes run an integrity check on the database when you start it again. Make sure the tracks are checked before you try syncing again.
tt2

K9A - Windows XP Patch Install Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for