K9ND Speedster 2 sata speed limit?

Hi everyone
I just bought a SSD for one of my pc's.
pc specs:
K9ND speedster 2
2x Opteron 2380
4x2GB reg ecc pc-5300
XFX ATI 4890BE
SSD: OCZ Agility 2 60GB
I see a lot of people who reach 250MB/s read and write with this SSD, but I get stuck at 150MB/s read and write.
Is this a known issue? Should i get myself a SATA controller to fix this problem or is there another way?
Thnx for the support

But don expect too much anyway, it's software controller and not a real hardware controller.
If you want real speed, get a controller with PCI-e 4x, own CPU and memory, those controllers will knock you off your feed.
But they are € 300 and up in price.
If you want RAID speed, get a real controller.
To give you an idea: http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/internal_raid/megaraid_sas/value_line/megaraid_sas_9261-8i/index.html
And go SAS drives instead, SATA is simply slow compared to SAS and SAS is just as expensive as a Raptor but twice the speed.

Similar Messages

Speed limit

Hi!
My turn to ask a question. I read some- and everywhere the Athlon XP has a MHz limit of 2500. It seems to be so, but is it? I tried on my own to find an answer, and below is a result of that, but...
Why I don't ask AMD?! Before asking well-paid and intelligent people, I thought I should try the forum.
Speed limit
Athlon XP and Sempron reached a speed limit
The main difference between the socket A processor nowadays seems to be in the architecture of the cache memories. The speed does not pass 2500 MHz. Why is that?
The first Athlons came in 1999. Their advantages compared to their competitor are/were the number of pipelines and calculation units:
- Three decoders for translating the complex but fundamental CISC-instructions into RISC-instructions. The processor has no problem working with the short and simple RISC-instructions.
- Athlon can have 72 instructions simultaneously, (Pentium III 40, and the earlier K6 only 24).
- Very competent FPU:s, three of them, and as FPU is better at calculating decimal numbers than the main ALU, it makes Athlons good at 3D graphics – where there are lots of that kind of mathematics when producing polygons.
In the beginning Athlons had external Level 2 cache. The cache sat on a slot beside the processor, and the architecture was called slot 1. With XP this changed, both Level 1 and Level 2 cache were built into the processor, and we got the socket A kind. Athlon XP was also built with thinner lines connecting the transistors, and got the ability to handle new instructions, got a better data pre-fetch technology, and an overheating protection.
So what’s the problem? Speed it up!
Well, one bottleneck lies between the processor and the RAM memory, the Front Side Bus (FSB). The processor is much faster than the RAM and process data as they come by. To keep the processor busy mainly Intel invented a sort of pipeline, or ladder. The processor is working on every step.
Data is sent from hardware, like sound data or network data over the PCI-bus, graphics data over the AGP-bus, hard-disk data over the IDE (PCI-/SATA) bus, etc. The data comes in ones and zeroes in little packages, which make up complex instructions. For the processor to be able to efficiently perform the instructions they need to be sized down to simpler instructions, from CISC to RISC. (CISC codes is such a fundamental part of the PC history they must remain.) The sizing down is done in the very beginning of each pipeline. In later steps of the pipeline, the instructions are interpreted further and performed.
Early processors needed one clock-cycle per step in the pipeline, but Athlons can manage 2,5 steps, as can for example Pentium 4. With the pipelines, as said, Athlon XP can do 72 instructions at the same time. Pentium 4 however has longer pipelines – with 20 steps – and can process 126 instructions. But the efficiency of a Pentium 4 is lower, which is why Athlons are quicker at the same MHz. Apple’s (Motorola’s) G4 processor is yet more efficient.
Athlon XP has 10 steps in each pipeline for the “main” ALU processor and 15 for the FPU. The reason why there are not more pipelines is that the processor is not kept busy with the slower RAM, and a lot of clock-cycles would be wasted. What is more, there will be too many erroneous instructions, when the processor has to start over, filling the pipelines with correct instructions.
RAM is slower
This was not the case in the beginning. All ran at the same speed, say 20 MHz: Processor, FSB, RAM-memory, PCI-bus etc. By separating the PCI-bus, which had hardware connected that couldn’t work at higher frequencies, things could start moving.
In 1989 came a Pentium with clock doubling. To compensate for the not ‘doubled RAM, L1 cache was invented. But processors kept getting faster. Next thing to be pushed forward was the FSB, which for socket A boards now is increased to 200 MHz x 2 (DDR). Intel increased it even further, but as the efficiency rate isn’t increasing at the same rats, Intel has backed down from the megahertz spiral, and has followed AMD in other ways of thinking.
So is this the simple basic calculation?
Athlon XP:s can do 2,5 instruction per clock-cycle in 10 steps per pipeline x the number of pipelines. The number of pipelines is limited by the number of instructions sent and their quality, 72 instructions at the same time. Can this be the reason for 2500 MHz limit?

Ok, reality check people...
Sharp, nice explanation, but you are wrong.
the x86 instruction set (including those nice MUL, ADD and other instructions) is a CISC instruction set.
The difference? A MUL takes 12 cycles, a DIV 40 or something...
RISC was a new computing architecture. Each instruction is simpler to allow higher execution frequency.
The efficiency of a computer is judge by the work done. W= IPC x Freq
Frequency is the well known number that we can find on our beloved processors. IPC is the instructions per clock. Why is the athlon more efficient than a P4 at the same frequency? higher IPC.
How do the chip manufacturer choose those factors?
Well, the problem is that the instruction set is FIXED. x86 (or i386), the instruction set, has been defined years ago as CISC and to maintain compatibility, you have to keep it. They then included internal decoders to change those instructions to streams of RISC instructions, each simpler. Those are the ones really implemented.
How does that influence the speed of the processor? Each instruction is executed by a unit (integer unit, floating point, MMX...), the more that unit has to do for that imstruction, the more time it takes (and the more transistor). This has 2 problems:
- one is that it will limit the overall speed as the more complex the unit, the less speedy.
- The second is that it ties down the unit. If you do a div in 40+ clocks, your integer unit is tied during this time.
The answer to this problem? Pipelines.
Pipelines are splitting the tasks in simpler tasks and executing each as independant as possible.
Example: laundry. You need washer and dryer. However, some of your clothes cannot go to the dryer.
Now, you have 2 loads. If you have a combined unit that takes 1.5h for wash + dry, it will take 3h total.
If you have a washer (.5h) and a dryer (1h), you load the first load (.5h) then transfer it to the dryer (1h). While the drier works, you load the next washer (0.5h). If you need it to perform also the drier, total time is 2.5h instead of 3h. If you dont need it, it is even faster 1.5h.
This is the way intel followed. Prescott has a 25+ pipeline. The problem comes from branches. If you misspredict your branch, you have to flush the pipe.
All that to say that with its manufacturing and its architecture, AMD could not release a AXP even close to 2.5GHz. Can you overclock a good unit over that limit? Sure. Intel did not release a 4GHz and yet you can overclock some P4 up to 5GHz (with appropriate cooling).
Oh, and the technology used is 90nm or 0.09um. Athlon XP is not even that small, it was still on 130nm.
This is the smallest critical dimention (smallest trace. Usually smallest transistor width).

Warranty service for K9ND Speedster

Hello Good People of the World!
I seem to have a problem and need some input if anyone can offer any.
I sold a K9ND Speedster to a man in Canada. Within a week of its arrival, he writes and says its defective. He contacted MSI Canada and they go over the issue and say it needs an RMA, to contact the seller (Me) and get an RMA and send it back. I contacted MSI and ordered another board for the customer (I aim to please). When the defective item arrived, I shipped the replacement. I shipped the replacement to MSI in California. I was contacted and was told the unit was not defective. They will be shipping it back to me. 5 days ago, the guy I sent a replacement to contacts me and said the second board is defective. I asked him what components he was using to build his system. Everything he told me should work except the power supply. It was a common 300 watt. It had a 20 pin connector. I suggested he contact a qualified tech to help him with his situation because he did not have adequate power. At this point, I figure he has no idea what he's doing. The contacted me 2 days ago and says he brought it to a "Qualified" tech. Had it tested with the now correct power supply and finds it defective.
Can anyone offer some in-site to this problem? I had already replaced a board that was not defective.
Thanks

It Works!!!!
Thanks All
It seems very stable so far.
Here are the Benchmarks:
Processor Arithmatic:
SiSoftware Sandra
Benchmark Results
Dhrystone ALU : 31210 MIPS
Whetstone iSSE3 : 27079 MFLOPS
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.
Performance Test Status
Run ID : DYNAMO-C14D7E7B on Thursday, August 02, 2007 at 7:41:11 AM
Platform Compliance : Win32 x86
NUMA Support : Yes
Number of NUMA Nodes : 2
SMP Test : Yes
Total Test Threads : 4
Multi-Core Test : Yes
Cores per Processor : 2
SMT Test : No
Dynamic MP/MT Load Balance : No
Processor Affinity : P0C0T0 P1C0T0 P0C1T0 P1C1T0
System Timer : 2.2GHz
Number of Runs : 64000 / 640
Processor
Model : 2x Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2214
Speed : 2.21GHz
Model Number : 4420 (estimated)
Cores per Processor : 2 Unit(s)
Type : Dual-Core
L2 On-board Cache : 1MB ECC Synchronous, Write-Back, 16-way set, 64 byte line size
Features
SSE Technology : Yes
SSE2 Technology : Yes
SSE3 Technology : Yes
Supplemental SSE3 Technology : No
SSE4 Technology : No
EMMX - Extended MMX Technology : Yes
SSE4A Technology : No
HTT - Hyper-Threading Technology : No
Performance Tips
Notice 5008 : To change benchmarks, click Options.
Notice 5004 : Synthetic benchmark. May not tally with 'real-life' performance.
Notice 5006 : Only compare the results with ones obtained using the same version!
Tip 2 : Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip.
Memory Bandwidth:
SiSoftware Sandra
Benchmark Results
RAM Bandwidth Int Buff'd iSSE2 : 6103 MB/s
RAM Bandwidth Float Buff'd iSSE2 : 6543 MB/s
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.
Int Buff'd iSSE2 (Integer STREAM) Results Breakdown
Assignment : 5974MB/s
Scaling : 6024MB/s
Addition : 6208MB/s
Triad : 6208MB/s
Data Item Size : 16 byte(s)
Buffering Used : Yes
Offset Displacement Used : Yes
Bandwidth Efficiency : 30% (estimated)
Float Buff'd iSSE2 (Float STREAM) Results Breakdown
Assignment : 6382MB/s
Scaling : 6453MB/s
Addition : 6701MB/s
Triad : 6637MB/s
Data Item Size : 16 byte(s)
Buffering Used : Yes
Offset Displacement Used : Yes
Bandwidth Efficiency : 32% (estimated)
Performance Test Status
Run ID : DYNAMO-C14D7E7B on Thursday, August 02, 2007 at 7:51:06 AM
Platform Compliance : Win32 x86
Memory Used by Test : 512MB
NUMA Support : Yes
Number of NUMA Nodes : 2
SMP Test : Yes
Total Test Threads : 4
Multi-Core Test : Yes
SMT Test : No
Dynamic MP/MT Load Balance : No
Processor Affinity : P0C0T0 P1C0T0 P0C1T0 P1C1T0
System Timer : 2.2GHz
Page Size : 4kB
Use Large Memory Pages : No
NUMA Information
Number of NUMA Nodes : 2
Node 0 - Free Memory : 372MB
Node 1 - Free Memory : 141MB
Features
SSE Technology : Yes
SSE2 Technology : Yes
SSE3 Technology : Yes
Supplemental SSE3 Technology : No
SSE4 Technology : No
EMMX - Extended MMX Technology : Yes
SSE4A Technology : No
HTT - Hyper-Threading Technology : No
Chipset 1
Model : Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Athlon 64 / Opteron HyperTransport Technology Configuration
Front Side Bus Speed : 2x 1005MHz (2010MHz data rate)
In/Out Width : 16-bit / 16-bit
Maximum Bus Bandwidth : 8040MB/s (estimated)
Logical/Chipset 1 Memory Banks
Bank 0 : 2GB ECC Registered DDR2-SDRAM 5.0-5-5-13 (tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS) CR1
Channels : 1
Speed : 2x 315MHz (630MHz data rate)
Width : 128-bit
Memory Controller in Processor : Yes
Cores per Memory Controller : 2 Unit(s)
Maximum Memory Bus Bandwidth : 10080MB/s (estimated)
Chipset 2
Model : Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Athlon 64 / Opteron HyperTransport Technology Configuration
Front Side Bus Speed : 2x 1005MHz (2010MHz data rate)
In/Out Width : 16-bit / 16-bit
Maximum Bus Bandwidth : 8040MB/s (estimated)
Logical/Chipset 2 Memory Banks
Bank 0 : 2GB ECC Registered DDR2-SDRAM 5.0-5-5-13 (tCL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS) CR1
Channels : 1
Speed : 2x 315MHz (630MHz data rate)
Width : 128-bit
Memory Controller in Processor : Yes
Cores per Memory Controller : 2 Unit(s)
Maximum Memory Bus Bandwidth : 10080MB/s (estimated)
Performance Tips
Notice 5008 : To change benchmarks, click Options.
Notice 5004 : Synthetic benchmark. May not tally with 'real-life' performance.
Notice 5006 : Only compare the results with ones obtained using the same version!
Warning 5400 : Low bandwidth efficiency (advanced). Check memory timings and settings.
Warning 5011 : NUMA nodes memory arrangement inefficient for maximum bandwidth.
Tip 2 : Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip.

MSI k9nd speedster running slow

Hi All,
I recently acquired the K9nd speedster 1....
AMD opteron 2 x 8354 2.2ghz quad cores,
2x Arctic 64pro fans
8mb Bios ver 2.20
4GIG ECC
Palit Nvidia 9800 GTX+ 512mb.....This is installed on the lower PCI e slot.....as the sata cables get in the way of the card
1x 1TB Hard Disk system
5x 500GIG for storage pool (not yet connected)
Kingwin Lazer 1000w
Zalman Z9+
I installed photoshop and noticed that to do a simple cloud render on a 5mb photo takes between 6-10 sec compared to my other computer running a intel core 2 duo 2.2 with 4gig which does it in under a second.
Even when opening preview in windows the pictures take a bit of time to come up...other apps like explorer/
I have tried this in Win xp, 7 and 8....and with another graphics card 8500 512mb
I checked the task monitor and the CPU and memory never seem to go above 20-40% of use
It seems that its being bottlenecked some where but I have no clue what to look or do next.
Thank you for you help in advance...if you need more info please let me know.

You better ask these guys: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=911736

K9ND SPEEDSTER-WA6, I need to use 2 3Ware PCIE controllers

Hi,
I need to build a server which needs two 3Ware 9690SA 8 port cards. I am thinking the server model with onboard VGA.
I will be using 64 bit windows 2003. Also two dualcore processors and 8GB of ram.
This board should support two PCIE8X class cards, but I was wondering if there are any real experiences.
And if somebody knows about the support for OPTERON QUAD 2350 2.0GHZ SKT F 4X512KB 68W WOF PIB. Now this processor is not much more expensive than 2218 dualcore. Would be nice to try.
Is there any real software for monitoring fan speeds, cpu temperatures etc. for this board. I need email notifications. 3Ware can handle the storage side.
Best Regards,
Markku

Well, here it is ... according to MSI Europe, the current K9ND Speedster boards will not support Barcelona out-of-the-box. You don't need a bios-update, but you need an entire new bios chip. The data needed to control the quad-cores does not fit in a 4Mbit chip, so MSI is going to use an 8Mbit chip. So, you'll need to swap bios chips. you will have to contact MSI in your country to obtain one.
Also, you won't have all features that come with these new cpu's. One disadvantage of having those cpu's on this K9 board is that there are no split power lanes to the chips, so all cores will get the same voltage. It is possible, however, to change clock speed on every chip independently.

K9ND Speedster 2ND System To Be Built

Ok, the time has come.
I've purchased 8GB of ECC Registered DDR2 667MHz Memory. (1GB Stick for each slot this time)
I will be using the AMD Opteron Quad Core 2347 Processors. (OS2347WAL4BGE) 95W version.
(OS2347PAL4BGE) is the 68W Edition.
And Of Course the MSI K9ND Speedster-WA6 once purchased.
Hopefully its the exact same as this one without the VGA.
I'll be purchasing a (Either 1 or 2) - 1TB Hard Drives SATA.
And a nVidia 8600GT this time around instead of a ATI Radeon. (This is still up in the air, but Mem size is 512MB for Video)
The question:
What size Power Supply should I get?
Or Specifically Power Rating (Watts)?
Will a 800W version do the trick for Quad Processors?
I will not be adding anything else to the system. I can burn DVD's on this one since it has 2 NEC Drives.

I would suggest that one for testing
What Is MAXON CINEBENCH?
CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite that assesses your computer's performace capabilities. MAXON CINEBENCH is based on MAXON's award-winning animation software, CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Spider-Man, Star Wars, The Chronicles of Narnia and many more.
MAXON CINEBENCH runs several tests on your computer to measure the performance of the main processor and the graphics card under real world circumstances. The benchmark application makes use of up to 16 CPUs or CPU cores and is available for Windows (32-bit and 64-Bit) and Macintosh (PPC and Intel-based).
The resulting values among different operating systems are 100% comparable and therefore very useful with regard to purchasing decision-making. It can also be used as a marketing tool for hardware vendors or simply to compare hardware among colleagues or friends.
Details and download: http://www.maxon.net/pages/download/cinebench_e.html
Used in:
MSI European Overclocking Challenge 2008
as well, to compare performance:
Who will reach the ultimate performance
on MSI P45 with DrMOS?

A browser with download speed limit?

It sounds weird but on Linux I can't find a browser that allows to set a download speed limit.
I found an extension for Firefox but it works only on Windows.
I know the existence of download managers like d4x, wget, jdownloader, etc... but some downloads can only be done by browser.
I know trickle too but if I want to change the speed limit I have to 'restart' the command (interrupting the current download).
Then I didn't find an extension for Chromium.

I was able to implement [global] throttling with wondershaper. You will need to modprobe sch_cbq if you use the CBQ script (not sure about the HTB one). I use the CBQ version.

K9ND Speedster BIOS Beep codes.

Hi bought a K9ND Speedster on ebay the other day to use with my 2347HE quadcores that I have. I realize this is not supported out the box and I need the 8mb bios chip. I borrowed a DUAL core socket F processor just to test the motherboard. With 1cpu, 1stick of 2GB ddr2- ecc reg ram the motherboard will not post. I get a quick series of beeps, then a stable "doo dee doo dee doo dee" beep code. I have tried 2 different video cards )pci and pci-e im just not sure what the problem could be. Any takers? And just to reiterate i am using a DUAL CORE cpu right now not the quadcore.

Sorry about that.
I dont hear the normal single beep signifying post. I hear an usualy series of tones followed immediatley by the doo dee doo dee. It takes about 15 seconds before the unsual tone series of tones. Nothing is displayed on screen. I have gone through and cleared the cmos through the JBAT1 jumper and dissconnected the battery as well (System was unplugged from power).
What are the random tones before the doo dee doo dee?
So you think the board is infact posting? Im going to try a couple more video cards.

Linksys E1000 speed limit

Hello all!
I have connected my 2 computers to E1000 with cables and looks like router is setting up some speed limits. Does anybody knows how I can remove speed limit? Did not found any setting in Cisco Connect and Advanced settings
Before: speed ~100Mbps
After: speed ~72Mbps (never goes higher, very strong feeling that it is limited)

before - without connecting through router
after - after connecting through router
moment ago I tried both options
directly to my ISP - ~100Mbps
through router - ~ 72 Mbps
three times switched cable between both options and results are same

Getting European Speed Limit Signs in US

Is anyone else in the US getting a Euro Speed limit sign? Not a big deal I guess.

Hope that you have used the in app feedback form as detailed here: http://conversations.nokia.com/2013/05/28/the-here-team-is-listening-to-you/
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

FTP speed limit

Hi there,
Trying to figure out why my upload speed is so slow using FTP. I'm working on a 10/10 link full duplex and my speed tests are pretty good overall. My question is why my upload speed using FTP with my browser/explorer is around 150Kbps while the same
file on the same host using FileZilla goes aroung 900Kbps ?! While testing, I disable my AV just to be sure.
Did some research and found a buffer/speed limit on ftp command (ftp.exe /?). Could that be the explanation or am I missing something ?
Thank you

Just to clarify, some questions please:
Are you on a network?
By "Upload", you mean uploading a file over the internet, not within a LAN or WAN, right?
When you say the same file goes 900 kbps using FileZilla, you mean upload, not download, correct?
Also, what kind of internet connection do you have?
One possibility, based on what you've mentioned, is that the server you're uploading to has a maximum speed per connection. This is fairly common. Apps like FileZilla typically use multiple connections to increase download speeds; I haven't used
one in awhile but it's possible they can do this for uploads as well. So if the server you're uploading to has a speed limit of 150 kbps per connection, you'll never be able to get higher speeds unless you use a multithreaded client (like FileZilla).

Speed limit pb

Hello fellows!
I was asked to build a program that calculates the Fine when you exceed the speed limit.
When you exceed 120miles/h the fine is 100$ plus 10$ for every additional mile/h.
I wrote a code,but something is wrong with it. When you drive at the legal speed which is less than 120miles/h it still gives a fine of 100$.
import javax.swing.JOptionPane;
public class radar
     public static void main(String args[])
          String si,so="";
          int s,q,f;
          si=JOptionPane.showInputDialog("Enter the speed");
          s=Integer.parseInt(si);
               q=s-120;
          if ( q>0 )
               f=100+10*q;
               so+="The speeding fine is"+" "+f+"$";
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,so);
          if ( q<=0 )
               so+="You are in the legal speed.There is no fine to pay";
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,so);
          System.exit(0);
}This is the first time i'm using the (if) condition. So please tell me if there is something wrong with it.

Melechesh wrote:
When you exceed 120miles/h the fine is 100$ plus 10$ for every additional mile/h.Wow, where do you live? That's a pretty low fine.
>
I wrote a code,but something is wrong with it. When you drive at the legal speed which is less than 120miles/h it still gives a fine of 100$.What do q, f, si, so, s mean? Perhaps you could use more meaningful variable names.
perhaps you forgot to add { } to your if statements, otherwise only the first statement is conditional regardless of your indentation.

Speed limit on wrt54gs

Hi all.
I have 2 PCs connected to the net via my wrt54gs router, one through a cabale and the other one wirelessly. Is there any way to set the speed limit for the wirless or both PCs? Like make it 50/50 all the time.
Thanks.
Regards.

If you didn't prioritize any device, the router should already work that way. The wired connection is always going to be faster because it's wired.
The box said windows xp or better... So I installed Linux!

Ovi Maps 3.04 - Speed limit warner settings

Hi,
Can someone explain how to correctly set the options for the Speed Limit Warner on Ovi Maps 3.04? I'm kind of confused here...
Also, I would like to know how these options differ from the Safety Spot Warner option?
Thanks in advance!

Firstly select imperial or metric, then decide what speed over the limit you wish to activate the warning. Mine is set at 2mph up to 50mph and 3mph over 50mph. In drive mode the speed indicator (bottom left) shows green, but when exceeding 32mph in a 30mph area turns red and emits a warning. Subsequently in a 60mph limit, exceeding 63mph produces a warning. The map software detects the road speed limits, and this is an excellent safety feature. In respect of police safety cameras and mobile speeding units the general concensus is that a tolerance of 10% + 2mph is used to counter inaccurate speedometers. Also note that the speed displayed by the map is by GPS (more accurate than a speedometer). Hope this helps!

K9ND Speedster board won't work with opteron 2212

Hello,
Does anybody know if this board is compatible with opteron 2212? I am building a computer and when I plug both cpu's all I get is a black screen. If I plug in one cpu (it does not matter which one) the system boots.
Has anybody built a PC with this board using dual CPUs (Opteron 2212)? I checked the numbers and I have a matching pair. Am I missing something? I checked MSI's Qualified Vendor List and I don't see this particular CPU. They only show Opteron 2210, 2216, 2218, and 2220, does that mean that I can only used the CPU's on this list?
Please help!
Here is the link for the motherboard that I have. I have the workstation type, which does not have a built in VGA.
http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php?func=proddesc&prod_no=1131&maincat_no=133&cat2_no=208#

Quote from: BOSSKILLER on 24-August-08, 03:33:06
How are placed your memory sticks?
Do you use 8pin CPU power cable rather than 4pin?
Hello, thanks for the fast replies.
My memory sticks are placed in DIMM one and two of CPU 0 and it's working with one CPU. If I plug in both CPUs with I memory stick on each (DIMM ONE) or 2 sticks (DIMM one and two) the system does not boot.
I also noticed that If i plug in the 4 stick (4gb) of RAM in CPU 0 the system does not boot either.
Quote from: Hans on 24-August-08, 06:47:28
Let's go simple with this one:
1. The bios is NOT the isue here. 1.3 simply works with the 2212.
2. You installed your stuff onto another K9ND Speedster and that booted. Was it a K9ND Speedster V1 or V2 that your friend has?
3. The board was RMA'd, right? Are you 100% sure that you didn't receive the same board back as you sent? Did you mark the old board in a way that you can actually tell that it was the one you RMA'd?
* Yes, I installed all the stuff to my friend's board and the same thing happened. He bought the board at the same place... :(
* Yes the board was RMA'd. I am sure that I got another one because the first board that I had before did not work with one CPU plugged in either and the new one does.
Quote from: Bas on 24-August-08, 22:22:54
You did connect all power-plugs properly did you?
Yes, I did. I plugged in the 24pin and the other next to it 8 pin.
Do you guys have any idea what could be wrong? Is it something that I have to change in the set up to tell the bios to accept 2 cpus or igb memory sticks? or is there something I have to change in the board on the board?
I really appreciate your help and effort. Thank you.

K9ND Speedster 2 sata speed limit?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for