Kanban with purchase order : avoid manual change status to full

Dear guru ,
i use a kanban with purchase order.
When I enter status empty (using for example PK13N) the system create purchase order.
I want to avoid that the users enter status full using PK13N or PKBC .
The users execute goods receipts against purchase order using MIGO in order that the system trigger status full automatically.
How can I avoid that users change manual status to full using PK13N or PKBC ?
Thanks.

We have this scenario and to solve that we did a development. I heard in the past that even you can configure it on SPRO it doesn't work.
I made some tests recently but I didn't get any positive result. We did tests entering the kanban id into the inbound delivery and post through vl32n and migo but it doesn't work.
Regards
Eduardo Chagas

Similar Messages

Issues with Purchase order change documents

Hi Gurus,
I have some peculiar issues with Purchase order. The PO line item has deletion indicator set but I can't find who set the deletion indicator. The PO change documents doesn't show anything related to deletion indicator.
Please help to fix the Issue.
Regards,
Senthil

Hi
Check it in Tcode SE16
Table Name CDHDR and CDPOS
Regards,
Raman

SRM 7.0 Purchase Order Response always in status "In process" after confirm

Hello experts,
this problem is similar to the thread [SRM-SUS Purchase Order Response always "In Status"; which has been not finally responded.
My problem exists in an environment without SUS.
When a buyer confirms a PO response (POR) without any change, the system generates a new PO response with status "In process". This new POR has also to be confirmed or rejected but the system generates again a new PO response with status "In process".
So we have a very nice loop for the purchaser without escape!
We are on SRM 7.0 SP07. The other thread mentioned that SAP will create some OSS notes, but I found nothing about this problem.
Any ideas?
Regards
Joe

Hi Gurus.
I want to share my experience with this case.
We have the same scenario, Confirm PO, the result is PO confirmed, but we receive a response from ECC and this Confirmed PO changes its status to "In Process" / "En Tratamiento".
The new relevant information is that we added 2 new fields to the item PO, these fields are filled ok and sent to ECC.
In a first time these new fields were lost due to the response from ECC. To avoid this situation I implemented the BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI for BUS2230, and method BBP_SUSPO_CHANGE to copy from the BBP_PDISC (Object BUS2230) rows the values to the new rows in the same table BBP_PDISC (Object BUS2201).
With this change the new documents are confirmed directly and not changed to "In Process"/ "En tratamiento".
That was my experience, now I have a question...
In the correct business process for SAP SRM SUS when you confirm full a PO...
* this will be blocked or no?
* Can be modified the confirmed items?
* This depends of customizing?

Vendor postings with purchase order

hi,
I am learning SAP Fi/co.I have one doubt .what are steps we have to maintain to post vendor transactions with purchase order.if u have any material about mm plz send to me.

Commitment
Definition
Identifies costs that will be incurred in the future for materials and services that you have requested or ordered. Commitments reserve funds that will become costs at a future date.
Use
On the account assignment objects, Commitments Management portrays the cost side of the procurement process for MM Purchasing. The costs incurred are assigned to business objects, such as orders, cost centers, or projects.
In Commitments Management, you can specify which object the costs are to be assigned to (for example, purchase order costs). In this case, this is known as an Initial Account Assignment.
Commitments Management distinguishes between three types of commitments, depending on the account assignment object:
Order Commitment:
The commitment is initially assigned to an order.
Cost Center Commitment:
The commitment is initially assigned to a cost center.
Project Commitment:
The commitment is initially assigned to a project, or to a work breakdown structure element.
For more information, see the SAP Library:
For Internal Orders
Financials ® Controlling ® Internal orders ® Manual Actual Postings On Internal Orders.
For Cost Center Accounting
Financials ® Controlling ® Cost Center Accounting ® Manual Actual Postings.
For Project System
Financials ® Controlling ® Commitments/Actual Updates Of Transaction Data
Integration
Commitments occur
In Purchasing, due to:
Purchase requisitions (purchase requisition commitment) define the internal requirement for a material or a service. Purchase requisitions have a control function and you change them at any time.
Purchase orders (purchase order commitment):
Purchase orders are contractual requests to a vendor, to supply certain goods or services according to the agreed conditions. No short-term, unilateral changes can be made.
due to funds commitments (commitment for funds commitments):
- You can use Funds Commitments to reserve funds for costs you are fairly certain to incur, but you cannot yet assign to a specific business transaction (such as, a purchase order or a purchase requisition).
Regards,
SUbha

No Update FMIOI and KBLP tables with purchase order

Hello,
We have un serious problem : No Update FMIOI and KBLP tables with purchase order
System : SAP ERP 6.0 /7.0 - EHP 4
Note 965633 was read.
1) First case: The purchase order 4510000673 does not reduce the funds reservation.
Purchase order 4510000673 should consume the funds reservation 1200000193 because all post of the PO charge the funds reservation 1200000193.But the consumption history of the funds reservation 1200000193 donu2019t show this consumption.
In table FMIOI, we do not have lines with amount type 0200 (reduction) but whe have the lines with the post of PO with amount type (0100). The Purchase order 4510000673 should consume the funds reservation 1200000193.
In table KBLP, the fields are :
Total amount (LC) - HWGES = 53.409,40
Amount used u2013 WTABB = 0,00
Reduction amount u2013 HWABB = 0,00
Open amount u2013 CWTFREE =    53.409,40
Reduced amount u2013 WTABG = 0,00
Reduced amount u2013HWABG = 0,00
To solve the problem, we executed the transactions : FM4N et FMN5 and the program RFFMRC20 but no result.
2) Second case : Delete a item of a purchase order does not release the budget
The single item of the purchase order 4510000597 is deleted but in the display of consumption History of the funds reservation 1200000137, the amount of the purchase order is not to zero.
To solve the problem, we executed the transactions : FM4N et FMN5 and the program RFFMRC20 but no result.
Somebody already had a similar problem ?
Thank you
Fabian

Hello Fabian
There are two known notes dealing with missing update on reference Earmarked Funds, I am listing them for future references:
1376800 Earmarked funds: Incorrect open amount
1438487 RFFMRC20: Missing KBLE records are ignored
These notes correct some errors within the Standard.
However, in your scenario, problem has to do with an incorrect execution of a Commit work inside a customer user-exit. After elimination of this commit work, new Po's are working correctly.
Remaining task is the correction of old PO's. Manual correction via small changes with ME22N (for instance, adding a '.' to the line item text/s) will force the correct update and fix your database
If you agree, we can close this thread (?)
Kind regards
Mar

Novated Purchase orders cannot be changed error

Hi Experts,
while trying to edit the PO we are getting an error as " Novated Purchase orders cannot be changed" . I am confused that which field is used to differentiate the normal PO to that of novated PO at portal level. Please let us know why this error occurs and how can we solve the issue ?
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Aishwarya.M

Hello Aishwarya ,
A Novation is agreement of parties usually done in conjunction with an assignment where upon the assignment there is now a new agreement between the original party whose contract was assigned and the party to whom the contract was assigned that in effect extinguishes (cancels) the old agreement and relieves the assigning party of liability under the contract.
For example if A and B have a contract and there is an assignment and novation of that contract by B to C, the contract would now be between A and C and B would no longer be liable to A under the contract as the “novation” extinguishes their liability.
If you wanted to prevent a novation you might include something like the following:
“This contract shall be binding on the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Except in the instance of an assignment or transfer by Buyer of all or any portion of this agreement, the assigning party shall remain liable for the performance of any assigned or transferred obligations hereunder.
The requirements for a novation may vary by jurisdiction. For example in New York for there to be a novation it must specifically say it is a novation. In assignment consent letters Suppliers may try to create a novation by the words they use where the language in affect would say that Buyer may only look to the new entity going forward. Please check with the PO which supplier is being used and also check is there any third party involvement in that PO.
Thanks
Gaurav Gautam

MIRO: posting to G/L Accounts with purchase order reference

hello
our company want to post an invoice for other expense in MIRO through the tab "G/L Acconunt" and don't through the tab "PO reference".
our problem that when we post through "G/L Account" how we allocate the "purchasing document" to the line of G/L Account?
in miro there is an option to create a posting line with purchase order reference to a g/l account and i read the documentation that says proceed as follows:
1. choose miro
2. enter header data as required
3. allocate the invoice to a document and check the items to be settled - i don't underdand what i need to do in this step?
4. choose the tab page g/l account
5. enter data as requierd.
thanks
meir

hi
in the table below your MIRO screen you will see PO Reference on this tab select the item of the PO that you need post for this PO, in the tab G/L account you can make manual post aditional to the PO, also you can in the tab PO reference modify amounts and quantity if you need, but it is not recommended

Batch file rename. I have multiple files I want to rename, that have a date in their name in the mm/dd/yy format. The slashes seem to freak out the batch rename function. Any workarounds that would help me avoid manually changing each name?

OS X Yosemite 10.10.2, Macbook Air,
Finder batch file rename function. I have multiple files I want to rename, that have a date in their name in the mm/dd/yy format. The slashes seem to freak out the batch rename function and it won't work. I took out the slashes and worked fine. Any workarounds that would help me avoid manually changing each name? I should point out that I want to leave most of the name intact just change the first word in each name. Also the files I'm working with are in PDF format.

That's a comment in the file. It has no effect at all.

Problem with purchase orders and cancelling order lines

Hi,
We have a problem with purchase orders and cancelling order lines. For example we have created PO no. 4300291277:
We have made a GR 5000186897 on 03.09.2010 amount 1.920 and tried to cancel it with GR 5000208866, but it takes the invoice amount 1.724 instead of 1.920. What is the correct way to undo this orders, so we cancel the 1.920 and not the 1.724?
Please help me, your help will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Najma.

hi,
You have to cancel the IR first...and then do cancel the GR...
yes, there will be diff. in the price(if the price changes in bwtn)..if no changes in the price , the price will taken as old one..
Process:
1. Cancel IR
2. Then cancel GR..
3. then go the PO and try to delete the line item..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Print document type Q02( technical delivery terms) with Purchase Order

Hi all
1) I have activated the QM procurement for a certain material and I have assigned the control key that makes mandatory the technical delivery terms on the material master (standard control key 0002).
2) I have created a Document Info Record Q02 to hold the Technical Delivery Terms assigning a PDF file. Document is released.
3) I have assigned the DIR to the material master (object link in the DIR).
I would like to know how to print the this DIR with Purchase Order. I am testing this scenario in IDES system and the form does not get printed.
Could anyone please advice how to get the PDF file printed with the purchase order?
Thank you

Hi Sappmqm,
There is no internal way, you would have to create an ABAP program to handle this function, where it would search the material record to pull the DIRs linked and then open them on user's screen for printing.
Additional SAP add-ons are available as 3rd party apps, can click my name and contact me for more detail if you like.
Good luck.

BBP purchase order cannot be changed in R/3. Can only be displayed.

Hi,
(1) I am trying to changes the Payment term in the PO from 0012 to 0000.
But getting error as "BBP purchase order cannot be changed in R/3"
(2) As Invoice is already booked against this PO. I feel the change Payment terms will not come in the picture.
If I want to change the payment terms as well as it should come in the consideration for payment. Then what can be done? what is the way forward?
Thanks in advance.
Pradeep S Yekunde

plz check the settings in spro > material management > purchasing > purchase order > define screen layout at document level.
here you plz check the settings for aktv and me22n for "terms of delivery and payment".
check whther it is optional entry or not.
regards
jash

Invoice Verification without GR and with Purchase Order

Hi all
During the Logistic Invoice Verfication (MIRO) without GR and with Purchase Order, I want to exclude "Invoice to be received" account (WRX) from the posting. How can I do it?
Let me know
Thanks

it doesn't work. Can you explain me better the solution?
Thanks

How to link asset with purchase order and PO Item.

Hello,
I have to generate a report which contains columns
Asset No , po no(ebeln) ,PO Item(ebelp),Material no etc
My query is how to link asset with purchase order and PO Item.
I am selecting asset and po no. from anla but how to get
po item no(ebelp)?
po line item is important in this report because every line item has differrent asset and material no.
i tried to match asset no in mseg table but i am not getting asset no in mseg .
how should i proceed ?

Thanks Thomas & Srimanta for the quick response.
When I checked EKKN table by entering PO there is no asset no. in anln1 field.
Also I would like to add that, In me23n for a PO, account assignment category we are entering 'F' for internal order settlement.
Where can i find the link between asset and po no(ebeln) and po item(ebelp)?
Regards,
Rachel
Edited by: Rachel on Aug 11, 2008 7:23 AM

DMS link with Purchase order,invoices and material master

Hi, all,
Here is my ?
Can we link incoming material invoice with purchase orders for reference purpose throught DMS.
rgds,
ben

hi
you can link the objects through object link in dms.
go to tcode dc10 select the documnet type, click on define object link. click new entry and select object type as EBAN/EKPO
this way dms is link to purchase order.
thanks ,
regards,
nitin
award point if useful

KO22 explain with Purchase Order

Please explain, how KO22 (Original Budget related with Purchase order, Using Internal Order)

Hi,
When you create an budget for 1000 and a PO for 500. (say you have set up a max from 10 %) You make a new PO for 600 there is no problem but it is not possible to create a new one for 601.
The rule is Budget - postings - PO = ammount to go.
It is possible to exclude som g/l account. and create fases, Like budget is on:
100 procent message and send a Mail
110 error
Paul

Kanban with purchase order : avoid manual change status to full

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for