Kcheck for kernel compilation?

Just found this tool on sourceforcge, http://kcheck.sourceforge.net/ . Did anybody try this tool for a kernel compilation?

definitely keep the stock kernel as a fallback.
and here's another tip, with a story. I spent several hours yesterday compiling a kernel for my webserver, to squeeze a little more juice out of it. I can't found how many times i kept recompiling because i kept getting kernel panics. luckily i still had the stock kernel as a fallback. but what i messed up, and must have known somehow i messed up the whole time, because it eventually just dawned on me out of nowhere, was my messed up my grub menu.lst. what i did, was copy and paste the default arch kernel lines and just modified them for the new kernel, but what i forgot to do was add the -custom on the vmlinuz26 line, so i was still using the stock kernel, but with initrd disabled, thats why i was getting the kernel panics, god knows how much compile time i could have saved had i noticed that sooner.....but my ADD must have kicked into overdrive or something, i guess it comes with the territory
bottom line is, pay attention,

Similar Messages

18h of kernel compilation for nothing

Just when it was about to finish, I got:
VOFFSET arch/x86/boot/voffset.h
LDS arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds
AS arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.o
CC arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.o
CC arch/x86/boot/compressed/string.o
CC arch/x86/boot/compressed/cmdline.o
CC arch/x86/boot/compressed/early_serial_console.o
OBJCOPY arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin
HOSTCC arch/x86/boot/compressed/relocs
arch/x86/boot/compressed/relocs.c: In function \u2018print_absolute_symbols\u2019:
arch/x86/boot/compressed/relocs.c:405:14: warning: variable \u2018sh_symtab\u2019 set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
RELOCS arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs
LZMA arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.lzma
lzma: (stdin): Cannot allocate memory
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.lzma] Error 1
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-pf.
==> Restart building linux-pf ? [y/N]
==> ---------------------------------
==>

Lockheed wrote:No way. On my Core 2 Duo 2.1Ghz and 4GB RAM Arch kernel compiles in 40-60 minutes (can't say for sure).
Wtf, not possible. Really. On the weekend I'll be at the Pentium-M again, I'll go compile a kernel using the Arch config file. I can't imagine it taking more than half an hour.
Lockheed wrote:No. It's mine. It's awesome and you can't have it Seriously, I have an old lightweight LXbuntu 9.04 on it and it works like a charm.
Whoa!
Though, of course it works like a charm, with 384MB you have plenty of ram. Should be enough even for a kernel compile. Just don't compile in a tmpfs. And, like tomegun says, maybe switch from lzma to gzip compression. And a machine-specific config would also cut down on the compile time a lot.
Lockheed wrote:I have a Pentium 133, too, unfortunately the mobo must be cracked somewhere as it rarely starts. What a pity.
My condolences
We had the habit of always giving away the old computer when we bought a new one. Sometimes I regret it. One of the masterpieces was a Pentium MMX 166Mhz with, get this, 3dfx Voodoo graphics. Yeah, the legendary accelerator. Oh how I wish I still had that. The oldest machine that's still at home is an AMD Duron 800Mhz, with I think a Geforce FX 5200.
Edit: Holy eff, I compiled a kernel with an Arch config on a Core i3-530. It took 24 minutes!! My fairly generic kernel takes 4:30 minutes, a machine-specific one takes 2:30 minutes. Man, the Arch kernel really does have everything including the kitchen sink in it. So I can now see it taking 60 minutes on a Core2Duo.
Compiling all that stuff on a slow machine makes no sense, so Lockheed I really suggest you make a machine-specific config. You'll get the kernel compiled in like 1/10 of the time.
Last edited by Gusar (2012-02-28 14:42:31)

ASM module for kernel 2.4.21-27EL

Does anybody know from where I can download ASM module (RPM or source) for kernel 2.4.21-27EL . I managed to install ocfs module with that kernel using ENBD - project for network shared storage, but the ASM module for kernels 2.4.21x is compiled for 2.4.21-19
the source supports only 2.4.19...
Any idea anybody?

Hi, please send me the error log file,
Thanks.
Message was edited by:
Serch-NET

Kernel compile problem

in arch 0.7, when i compile redhat hat kernel 2.4.21-27.0.1.EL, gcc 3.4.3 complains:
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Wno-unused -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -freorder-blocks -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=pentium4 -DKBUILD_BASENAME=main -c -o init/main.o init/main.c
In file included from /data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/linux/sched.h:24,
from /data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/linux/mm.h:22,
from /data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/linux/slab.h:14,
from /data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/linux/proc_fs.h:5,
from init/main.c:15:
/data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/linux/smp.h:31: error: conflicting types for 'smp_send_reschedule'
/data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/asm/smp.h:41: error: previous declaration of 'smp_send_reschedule' was here
/data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/linux/smp.h:31: error: conflicting types for 'smp_send_reschedule'
/data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/asm/smp.h:41: error: previous declaration of 'smp_send_reschedule' was here
In file included from /data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/linux/unistd.h:9,
from init/main.c:17:
/data/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL/include/asm/unistd.h:382: warning: conflicting types for built-in function '_exit'
make: *** [init/main.o] Error 1
gcc info:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,objc --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.3
but when i compile the kernel src in redhat as 3 with the same kernel config , compiling options and kernel compiling procedure, everything is ok. the gcc info:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.3/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --host=i386-redhat-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-20)
what's the problem ? it's something between gcc 3.4 and kernel 2.4.21 (or redhat ?) ? how to resolve this problem ?

jnengland77 wrote:
hmmm if you need the patch Con Kolivas has a patch... idk if this is the exact need.
1g lowmem?
Many machines now have exactly 1Gb ram and the standard memory split on i386 does not allow you to use more than 896Mb ram without enabling high memory for at least 4Gb. The problem is that this incurs an overhead whereas we can simply change this split with this patch to allow i386 architectures to use up to 1Gb ram without enabling highmem. This is configurable if HIGHMEM is disabled.
I also don't know if his old patches have the patch or if the current will work on the 2.4 kernel..
Just looked around and found the 2.4 are now Ick patchset and i don't see that... CK does have a server patch... If anything just get the 2.6 CK server patchset... 2.6 is stable, but how am I to say I've only used 2.6... Go with 2.6 ck server.
websites: CK patchset 2.6
ICK 2.4 patchset
i really want a huge kernel space, and i can't find the 4G kernel space vm patch for 2.4 at these links
thanks anyway

Issue after kernel compilation

I've compiled my own kernel based on the arch linux default kernel its configuration file. I simply executed make clean && make dep && make modules && make bzImage && make modules_install. Afther the depmod I've built a ramdisk with mkinitcpio.Unfortunately I'm not able to boot into my new self-compiled kernel. Here you can see my /boot/grub/menu.lst:
# (0) Arch Linux Self-compiled kernel
title Linux 2.6.30.5 [/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30.5]
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.30.5 root=/dev/sda3 ro
initrd /kerneltest.img
# (0) Arch Linux
title Arch Linux [/boot/vmlinuz26]
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sda3 ro
initrd /kernel26.img
While booting into the new kernel the next error message about the root device shows up. I've noticed I'm able to boot the default arch kernel that's using the same root device (=/dev/sda3) on this desktop.
Waiting 10 seconds for device /dev/sda3
Root device /dev/sda3 doesnt exist, attempting to create it
Error: Failed to parse block device ids for /dev/sda3
Error: Unable to detect or create root devide /dev/sda3
If you would like to see my partitions:
/dev/sda1 /boot ext2 defaults 0 1
/dev/sda2 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/sda3 / ext4 defaults 0 1
/dev/sda4 /home ext4 defaults 0 1
Who can help me with this issue? Thanks.
Last edited by Nando (2009-09-05 15:40:04)

I've compiled a new kernel but the same issue remains. I executed some important changes in my kernel config: CONFIG_SCSI=y, CONFIG_ATA=y, CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y (instead of being modular as in the default arch linux kernel). I also inserted the "aufs" lines, but they were gone in my .config file after the kernel compilation.(I think it was after make dep)
A "diff" of both .config reveals that aufs is almost the only difference. (I've already mentioned the stuff that used to be modular and is now built-in.)
3 root@archlinux $ diff /usr/src/linux-2.6.30.5/.config /usr/src/linux-2.6.30-ARCH/.config
3,4c3,4
< # Linux kernel version: 2.6.30.5
< # Mon Sep 7 10:35:44 2009
> # Linux kernel version: 2.6.30
> # Mon Aug 17 16:49:59 2009
1269c1269
< CONFIG_SCSI=y
> CONFIG_SCSI=m
1418c1418
< CONFIG_ATA=y
> CONFIG_ATA=m
3905c3905
< CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y
> CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m
3912c3912
< CONFIG_JBD2=y
> CONFIG_JBD2=m
3914c3914
< CONFIG_FS_MBCACHE=y
> CONFIG_FS_MBCACHE=m
4041a4042,4052
> CONFIG_AUFS_FS=m
> CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_127=y
> # CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_511 is not set
> # CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_1023 is not set
> # CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_32767 is not set
> CONFIG_AUFS_HINOTIFY=y
> CONFIG_AUFS_EXPORT=y
> CONFIG_AUFS_SHWH=y
> CONFIG_AUFS_BR_RAMFS=y
> # CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG is not set
> CONFIG_AUFS_BDEV_LOOP=y
4427c4438
< CONFIG_CRC16=y
> CONFIG_CRC16=m
I've built an own ramdisk again with mkinitcpio, but I'm using the default kernel26.img
/boot/grub/menu.lst:
# (0) Arch Linux
title Arch Linux [/boot/vmlinuz26]
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sda3 ro
initrd /kernel26.img
# (0) Arch Linux
title Arch Linux [/boot/vmlinuz2-6-30.5]
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.30.5-nando root=/dev/sda3 ro
initrd /kernel26.img
Last edited by Nando (2009-09-07 17:38:21)

Custom kernel compilation with abs..

Been trying out custom kernel compilation with abs, since i only know the regular make menuconfig style, thought that this would be a good thing to learn.
here is my kernel pkgbuild (showing only the part that i changed):
# Contributor: dibblethewrecker <dibblethewrecker>
pkgname=kernel26
pkgver=2.6.17.13
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="The Linux Kernel 2.6.x.y and modules (IDE support), built with ... patchset"
url="http://www.kernel.org"
depends=('module-init-tools')
install=kernel26.install
##### if you are using a single patch from a patchset you can add the name, without it's extention, below
patch=2.6.18-rc6-mm2
##### add the names of any patches to this section, ensure you have the correct extentions!
source=($patch.bz2 config ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-$pkgver.tar.bz2 )
I want to install the 2.6.18-rc6-mm2, so i downloaded that patch and put it in the same folder as PKGBUILD.
I copied kernel26.install and put it in the same folder as the PKGBUILD.
when running makepkg it asks for a config file.. So i copied the config file in /var/abs/kernels/kernel26/. But this will build with an old config file.. how can i as when doing the manual way, do a make menuconfig and enter the settings i want for this kernel??
thanks

I'd say it does too, and I think the problem is here:
jinn wrote:I copied kernel26.install and put it in the same folder as the PKGBUILD.
Did you just copy the install script, or did you edit it to create an image with a unique name? The script is hardcoded to create an image called kernel26.img i.e. the image name required by the stock kernel, so if you ran it as it is, you have overwritten the images for your stock kernel with images for your new kernel.
You might still be able to boot your new kernel with kernel26-fallback.img, but if not you will have to boot your stock kernel using the initrd image, which will have been unaffected.
Once your system is running again, you need to regenerate the kernel26 images using mkinitcpio, and then you can start debugging the problem with your new kernel.
Of course, if you've already edited kernel26.install for your new kernel, ignore the above, and I'll start again.

In depth Kernel Compilation

Hello,
I just wanted to give a little shameless self promotion on a new article that I just wrote up:
http://fsk141.com/habari/kernel-compilation-arch-linux
And the digg link:
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Kernel_Compi … Arch_Linux
Let me know what you think. Add comments if I'm missing anything that you would like to see. Also if you would like articles on anything in particular, send me an email at [email protected] and I would be happy to think about it

...[the kernel] can be split into two main types. The first being a monolithic kernel, and the second being a modular kernel. At one time the linux kernel was a monolith, and consisted of one large file. Today's implimentation of the kernel is modular..
This is not technically accurate. It should read something more like, " The Linux kernel is monolithic in nature, but can make use of modularity, (if compiled to do so) or can be compiled as static. A kernel compiled for modularity has the ability to load drivers (modules) on the fly, whereas a static kernel constantly maintains all drivers in memory. A static kernel may generally be advantageous for some who need a less versatile, lighter kernel compiled for a specific machine. A modular kernel is typically more versatile and able to be used on a wider range of hardware."
EDIT: Moving this..
Last edited by Misfit138 (2009-03-31 17:29:14)

Kernel Compile how not to do it !!!! [FXx]

EDIT I would like to say kernel compile problem was my fault.... I should have moved it then compiled 2.6.5-3 (gcc3.4) I will in future use /usr/src (improve my CLI skills)
I am sorry for posting but this old boy gets in muddle sometimes & I like to think out loud.
After several mugs of tea & reading posts I now have kernel 2.6.5-3 Xfee4.4 & nvidia working again (well for a couple of hours till 2.6.6 !!!)
pacman -Af
Many thanks again for all your help
Mr Green :oops:

If I use pacman -U I get a load of errors :
usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/isa/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/oss/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/oss/dmasound/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/parisc/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/pci/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/pcmcia/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/ppc/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/sparc/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.5/sound/usb/Kconfig: exists in filesystem
Mr Green :?

Ccache and kernel compilation -SOLVED

I have installed ccache and am compiling the kernel from the commandline, but can't get ccache working. Compiling takes a while, and ccache -s says there are no cached files. Read the wiki and man ccache, am a bit confused, and thought I had done what they suggested, but obviously not.
Can anyone help me set this up? Preferably I would like all compiling to be done using ccache, not just using makepkg. I think I have to softlink ccache and gcc, not sure how to do this.
Happily, my custom compiled kernel boots fine, sound is the only thing not working.
Last edited by scooby (2009-11-26 00:05:29)

I have discovered one of the cardinal rules for using Arch...if something doesn't work, check for typos.
ccache is working now, makes kernel compiling so much easier.
I'm having a read finding out the pros/cons of using PKGBUILD for a custom kernel. Not too fussed, everything works and it boots ridiculously quickly.
Last edited by scooby (2009-11-25 23:06:24)

Kernel Compile error

can someone look at http://members.aol.com/trekboy07/vmware.jpg I am getting kernel compile errors and i am doing everything in the FAQ. what i do is i untar the file from the arch 4.0 cd into /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 and run make menuconfig take file from /usr/abs/base/kernel make some changes and replace it, and run "makepkg" i have done this in VMWare and on a Thinkpad 600 and get the same errors.
thanks for the help

It seems like you bumped into a little bug in the linux kernel (at least, that's what google says, see the top link at http://groups.google.com/groups?q=undef … htool_gset )
I already sent a patch for this for 2.5 but I didn't know the problem
also exists in 2.4. The following patch fixes it:
--- linux-2.4.20-test/drivers/net/Makefile.old 2002-11-29 17:46:47.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.4.20-test/drivers/net/Makefile 2002-11-29 17:47:22.000000000 +0100
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_MAC8390) += daynaport.o 8390.o
obj-$(CONFIG_APNE) += apne.o 8390.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_PCNET) += 8390.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_SMC91C92) += mii.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SHAPER) += shaper.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SK_G16) += sk_g16.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HP100) += hp100.o
Zwane changed this driver to use the MII support library but he
accidentially forgot that this requires mii.o.
cu
Adrian

[Solved] Kernel compilation newbie questons.

Hello
That will be my first kernel compilation and i have few questions.
1.When i compile kernel from this(http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ker … sers_Guide) tortial i havo to do this:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/NVI … tom_kernel
2.When i compile modules to kernel there are diffrence when i have them as modules (lsmod)?
Thanks for anserws.
And I'm sorry for that questions.
Last edited by SpeedVin (2009-05-19 12:13:48)

Hi SpeedVin,
1. you must recompile nvidia driver if you are planning to use custom kernel.
You can do this by either using ABS or with yaourt -Sb command. The link you posted to wiki says it right.
2. When compiling drivers directly into kernel, they will make size of kernel bigger, but udev will not spend so much time autoloading them. The best practise is to have all needed modules compiled in kernel and turned autoloading modules off in /etc/rc.conf. Be aware, that not all modules are loaded when lsmod - e.g. when you plug in USB disk, udev loads needed modules (usb_storage, correct coding, etc.).
And last but no least, i can't get why is wiki giving advise to compile kernel like 10 years ago. If I were you, I would NOT choose this way. It is much easier to compile kernel with ABS, or with yaourt -Sb. All you need is to edit PKGBUILD and uncomment one of these lines:
#make menuconfig # CLI menu for configuration
#make xconfig # X-based configuration
#make oldconfig # using old config from previous kernel version
I am a happy user of xconfig menu (you need Qt3 package to use xconfig).
Configure your kernel as you need, save config file and exit configuration, compilation goes on and after 30-50min you have your kernel ready to install.
If you want a save option you can also edit and uncomment # pkgname=kernel26-custom to have your kernel alongside with -ARCH stock kernel. Note, that you must also edit nvidia's PKGBUILD if you want to use it this way.
I think this way will save you lot of time and the result is better, but it's up to you of course.

Error in executing a process for Flex compilation ....exceeds 32K...

Hi,
deployin my model i get the following error-message.
"Error in executing a process for Flex compilation, Error: Branch between 64935 and 97770 around line 0 exceeds 32K span. If possible, please refactor this component.
Error: Branch between 64935 and 97770 around line 0 exceeds 32K span."
Do i delete a sort-element from my model it is deployed very well. So what does this message exactly mean and how can I locate where the error occurs and how can i fix that problem because i need this sort-element to be in my model.
Thanks for your help!
Tobias

Hi Tobias,
You are receiving this error due to a current limitation in the Flex server. How you can fix this is to split the iView you are currently working on into two iViews, and embed one within the other. This will decrease the size of the current iView you are receiving the error for and eliminate this problem.
Hope this helps
Cheers,
Scott

Shell script for batch compilation of forms 10g on AIX 5.3L AS

Hi All,
Can anybody provide me the Shell script for batch compilation of forms 10g and reports 10g on AIX 5.3L AS?
Regards,
SAM

Hi Alex,
I tried with the below script as well as the one you had posted.
ORACLE_HOME=/opt/oracle/OraHome_3
export ORACLE_HOME
TNS_ADMIN=$ORACLE_HOME/network/admin
export TNS_ADMIN
LIBPATH=$ORACLE_HOME/lib32:$ORACLE_HOME/jdk/jre/bin:$ORACLE_HOME/jdk/jre/bin/cla
ssic:$LIBPATH
export LIBPATH
cd ../forms
for i in `ls *.pll`
do
echo Compiling Library $i ....
$ORACLE_HOME/bin/frmcmp module=$i userid=mydbuser/mydbuser@mydb
batch=yes module_type=library
compile_all=yes window_state=minimize
done
export ORACLE_HOME=/opt/oracle/OraHome_3
export ORACLE_TERM=vt220
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/oracle/OraHome_3/lib:/opt/oracle/OraHome_3/jdk/jre/l
ib:/opt/oracle/OraHome_3/jdk/jre/lib/i386:
cd ../forms
for i in `ls *.pll`
do
echo "Compiling Library $i ...."
/opt/oracle/OraHome_3/bin/frmcmp module_type=form userid=mydbuser/mydbuser@mydb
module=$i batch=yes compile_all=no
window_state=minimize upgrade=no
done
echo "PLL Compilation done"
But there was a same kind of error thst turning up all the time.
Compiling Library Agf.pll ....
Forms 10.1 (Form Compiler) Version 10.1.2.0.2 (Production)
Forms 10.1 (Form Compiler): Release - Production
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
PL/SQL Version 10.1.0.4.2 (Production)
Oracle Procedure Builder V10.1.2.0.2 - Production
Oracle Virtual Graphics System Version 10.1.2.0.0 (Production)
Oracle Multimedia Version 10.1.2.0.2 (Production)
Oracle Tools Integration Version 10.1.2.0.2 (Production)
Oracle Tools Common Area Version 10.1.2.0.2
Oracle CORE 10.1.0.4.0 Production
FRM-10043: Cannot open file.
Form not created
I hence updated the permissions on the pll as below
-rwxrwxrwx 1 oracle oinstall 335872 May 19 16:31 Agf.pll
But the problem is still persisting.
My environment details are as below.
I am working on Win XP machine. Connected to my AS via telnet and xmanager. I have set my DISPLAY to my local IP.
Is there any thing more that I need to do? If so then let me know.
Regards,
SAM

VT6122 Gigabit Ethernet driver for Kernel 2.6 (Fedora Core 2)

Hi,
I'm looking for the VT6122 Gigabit Ethernet driver. The manufacture doesn't provide it. And at MSI there is only a version for kernel 2.4 available! Can anybody tell me were I can find this driver?
Txs!!!

got it.
it was the tune2fs problem that is in the knowledge base.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/A2D53C8E0D88380B86256EBD005B31D2
looks like it's working now.
thanks.

ASMLIB for kernel 2.6.18-308.8.2

I have been waiting for the ASMLIB driver for RHEL kernel 2.6.18-308.8.2 for about a week.
Does anyone know when it might be released?

941556 wrote:
I've been watching for the ASMLIB driver for kernel 2.6.18-308.8.2 for the last week, but haven't seen it yet.It was released to ULN on 12th June 2012, along with the kernel. If you have Oracle Linux support, you can get it from the Oracle Software channel on ULN. I'll ping the guys who maintain the OTN page to see when it'll be updated.

Kcheck for kernel compilation?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for