KE28 Variants

We have 31 KE28 variants and someone has to update the period values each month. We have a custom variable variant for dynamic date selection with the proper format but I do not see how to link the variable variant to the KE28 period selection parameter. If possible, I would like KE28 Actual and Reference periods to both default to the prior period.
So my question is whether we can do one of the following:
1) Default in previous period whenever KE28 is run.
OR
2) Find a way to save a month/year value in the From Period fields that are dynamic as part of the report variant.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Tim

Tim,
I am sorry, but it is not my program to share. However my basic request was:
This transaction must allow an end-user to
maintain variants, be it his own variants or
for someone else (authorization checks are
performed).
The functionality has to remain similar to the
standard one found in SM38.
However, in addition to be able to work on a
specific variant, the user must also be able
to select multiple variants at the same time.
One particular advantage that this transaction
must provide compared to SM38 is to show on one
screen all the variants created by a specific
user, or all the variants from a specific program
or list of programs.
The programmer had just been to class and learned about a dialog transactions, which made this possible.
We have 3 variations on this:
1 - allows access to any variant and the ability to change it
2 - allows access only to variatns that the user created or is "last change"
3 - display only for any variant - with an ability to copy any of the variants for their own use.
Hope this is of some use to you and that you understand not sending the program.
Althea

Similar Messages

Variant change history log in T-code KE28 .

Hi,
Variant change history log needs to be found for the Variant XYZ used in T-code KE28 .If any body know the procedure could you please reply .
Regards
Srihari

hi mythily,
you mean to say that, the user has manually inputed a billing date (rather than the one captured automatically) and created this cancelled invoice..?
Or the user has changed the billing date after this cancelled invoice was created..?
If its the first case, i dont think there is any log created for this.
Regards
Jobi

KE28 - How to transport variant.?

I have created a couple of variants in KE28 , Need to know how to transport them.
RSTRANSP - doesnt seem to have the solution.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Arvind.

Download and upload variants from PRD to DEV
Selection Variables / Name of the Variable in a Variant
Selection parameter values to be copied to Excel

Top-Down Distribution - tcode KE28 (release upgrade from 4.6 to ECC 6.0)

All,
we are performing a release upgrade from 4.6 to ECC 6.0 and we have a problem with the tcode KE28.
The variant already set up in the system don't match with the selection fields present in the screen, and the following message is shown:
Message no. KG346
The variant does not adhere to the current Customizing setup
We have saved the variant again, and no problem are present, but the error message refers also to Customizing setup.
Is there a section in the Customizing where it is possible set up the field to show in the initial screen or the new fields (All Valuation Views, Legal Valuation View and Profit Center Valuation View) are due to the release upgrade?
If yes, do you know the transaction/path?
Thanks in advance for your collaboration.
Regards,
Jody Mancini.

Hi Satish,
Now i am sending some URL for Functional upgrade
May be those are all useful toyou
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/erp6/transactionsChangedinECC6.0
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/Default.aspx
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/erp6/
Regards
Surya

KE28 Log displaying wrong receivers

Hi Experts,
I'm testing the execution of KE28. I created 1 FI posting for an account that flows the value to the value field VV500. It was sent to CE1XXXX with record type B, and the PA segment contains only the profit center.
I have 2 SD postings in CE1XXXX that have the same profit center. The total line items for this record F is 192.
In the reference data, I flagged "Product", and some other characteristicsin distribution level. The profit center is marked to be TRANSFERED from the original posting. And the other characteristics will be Summarized.
I marked only the value field VV500 in the variant.
When I execute in test, the log displays 3 senders, and the receivers are also from Record Type B, but I selected the reference data to read only Record Type F. When I execute KE28 without "test", the results are correct, only record TYPE F with the profit center from the sender are distributed for the Value Field I selected (192 receivers).
Resuming: The log displays incorrect receivers.
Did you face any problem like this? Does anyone know if this is a bug, and if there is a note for this problem?
Kind Regards,
Mayumi

Hi Experts,
I'm testing the execution of KE28. I created 1 FI posting for an account that flows the value to the value field VV500. It was sent to CE1XXXX with record type B, and the PA segment contains only the profit center.
I have 2 SD postings in CE1XXXX that have the same profit center. The total line items for this record F is 192.
In the reference data, I flagged "Product", and some other characteristicsin distribution level. The profit center is marked to be TRANSFERED from the original posting. And the other characteristics will be Summarized.
I marked only the value field VV500 in the variant.
When I execute in test, the log displays 3 senders, and the receivers are also from Record Type B, but I selected the reference data to read only Record Type F. When I execute KE28 without "test", the results are correct, only record TYPE F with the profit center from the sender are distributed for the Value Field I selected (192 receivers).
Resuming: The log displays incorrect receivers.
Did you face any problem like this? Does anyone know if this is a bug, and if there is a note for this problem?
Kind Regards,
Mayumi

Layout variant not working

Hi ,
I have executed a report . I hide one column and saved the layout. The layout name comes on to the selection screen parameter which i have defined on the selection screen.
PARAMETERS: p_vari LIKE disvariant-variant. " ALV Variant
i have made the i_save = 'A' and is_default = 'x'. and also used other function modules reg. Variants.
but if i select the layout variant in the selection screen and execute it is not working . the hidden column also coming on the output.
But if the select the layout variant on the output of the report from the icon select layout it is working fine. the column which i have hidden is not coming. it is perfect. why it is not working when i select the variant in the selection screen.
Regards,
Rose.

Hi,
Please try this code
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR p_vari.
w_variant-report = sy-repid.
* Function module to show the variant of a ALV report
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_VARIANT_F4'
    EXPORTING
      is_variant = w_variant
      i_save     = 'A'
    IMPORTING
      es_variant = w_kvariant
    EXCEPTIONS
      not_found = 2.
IF sy-subrc = 2.
    MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE 'S'      NUMBER sy-msgno
            WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
ELSE.
    p_vari = w_kvariant-variant.
ENDIF.
END-OF-SELECTION.
MOVE w_variant TO w_kvariant.
    MOVE p_vari TO w_kvariant-variant.
    MOVE sy-repid TO w_kvariant-report.
*   Function module to check the variant existence
    CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_VARIANT_EXISTENCE'
      EXPORTING
        i_save     = w_save
      CHANGING
        cs_variant = w_kvariant.
    w_variant = w_kvariant.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
    EXPORTING
      i_callback_program          = sy-repid
      i_callback_pf_status_set    = 'SET_PF_STATUS'
      i_callback_user_command     = 'USER_COMMAND'
      i_callback_html_top_of_page = 'HTML_HEADING'
      i_grid_title                = text-t06
      i_grid_settings             = wa_grid_set
      is_layout                   = wa_layout
      it_fieldcat                 = t_fieldcat
      i_save                      = 'X'
      is_variant                  = w_variant
      is_print                    = wa_print
    TABLES
      t_outtab                    = t_header
    EXCEPTIONS
      program_error               = 1
      OTHERS                      = 2.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    CASE sy-subrc.
      WHEN 1. RAISE program_error.
      WHEN 2. RAISE others.
    ENDCASE.
ENDIF.
Regards
Krishna
Edited by: Krishna Gowrneni on Apr 17, 2009 5:27 PM

Layout variant is not working in background in ALV report

Hi,
I have one LAV report to send the report output through mail in foreground and backgroud.Final internal table is having 46 fileds to display the output.But here user is saving the layout variant and sending that layout variant output to mail id in excel format with zip file.Its working in foreground.But in background its not working.Even if we select the layout variant,its sending all the 46 fileds to mail.
here we have used the below FM to update the fieldcat itab.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_LAYOUT_INFO_GET'
    IMPORTING
      et_fieldcat   = it_fieldcat[]
      es_variant    = v_disvariant
    EXCEPTIONS
      no_infos      = 1
      program_error = 2
      OTHERS        = 3.
In for ground NO_OUT = 'x' for non selected fields and NO_OUT = ' ' for selected fields.
But in background NO_OUT = ' ' for all the fileds, even if we select the layout variant.
Please suggest me with the solution.
Regards,
Jayaram

hi ,
Do according to this
SORT t_ekbe by belnr.
if t_ekbe[] is not initial .
      SELECT MBLNR
        BWART
        SMBLN
        ERFMG   " This is the new added field
        erfme     " This is the new added field
      INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE t_mseg
    for all entries in t_ekbe
      from mseg
      where mblnr = t_ekbe-belnr
      AND   bwart = '101'.
endif.
after this
loop at t_ekbe .
loop at t_mseg where mblnr = t_ekbe-belnr .
t_ekbe-ERFMG = t_mseg-ERFMG .
t_ekbe-erfme =   t_mseg-erfme .
modify t_ekbe transporting ERFMG erfme .
clear t_mseg .
endloop.
clear t_ekbe .
endloop.
Regards
Deepak .

How to create a variant to a maintenance view (trans: SM31)

Hi gurus.
I have created a maintenance view (called z_jest). By running it from SM31 there is a variant option. However, I am not able to create the variant which I want to filter a selection upon in this transaction.
I have even looked into transaction SE54 and created a variant for the maintenance table view there( called z_jestv). Then going back to transaction SM31 and view z_jest, i push 'Variant' radiobutton and type as variant: 'z_jestv', I only get the message: "Variant z_jestv for object z_jest does not exist".
Can anybody please advice on how to create and/or connect the variant to the maintenance view?
Regards LL.

Hi Mahalakshmi
Thanks for reply.
When I look into the procedure, there is a prerequisite: "The basis dialog for which the maintenance variant is created already exists."
I am a little bit unsertain if I miss this 'Basic dialog'. Can you please advice on how to check / create this 'basic dialog' before I go on to create the variant. (I need this 'basic dialog' as input in the procedure you sent.)
(Note: I have already created a 'maintenance dialog' for the view, but I have a feeling, that is something different...)

How to Save Multiple Variants for a Report at a time?

Hi Experts,
I have a report in one server and I have copied the same into another server.
And now I also have to copy the variants of that report.
There are totally 192 variants for the report. So, is there any easier way to copy all those variants for the new report that I have created, rather than re-creating the variants one-by-one manually.
Note:There is no connection to both the servers. So I cannot transport them.
Thanks in advance.

Basis can do a export and import transport, still if don't have connection between boxes.
or
check this
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/abap/copy-program-variants-from-one-to-another.htm
a®

Error while saving FYV : Gaps in financial year variant periods

Hello Experts,
We are getting an error while saving a new FYV as:
Gaps in financial year variant periods XY
Message no. FGV556
Diagnosis
The period specification has gaps. The periods must be sequentially numbered without any gaps.
System Response
Only a correctly defined period assignment can be saved.
Procedure
Define the periods with consecutive numbers.
Details: The new FYV has 52/53 weeks as posting periods depending on calendar year.
For example, we are trying to define Fisc 2009 as follows. (Fiscal year 2009 = Nov 01 2008 to Oct 31 2009).
Month-Day-Period-Yearshift
11     ---     7     ---     1     ---     +1
11     ---     14     ---     2     ---     +1
11     ---     21     ---     3     ---     +1
11     ---     28     ---     4     ---     +1
12     ---     5     ---     5     ---     +1
12     ---     12     ---     6     ---     +1
12     ---     19     ---     7     ---     +1
12     ---     26     ---     8     ---     +1
12     ---     31     ---     9     ---     +1
1     ---     3     ---     9     ---     0
1     ---     10     ---     10     ---     0
1     ---     17     ---     11     ---     0
1     ---     24     ---     12     ---     0
1     ---     31     ---     13     ---     0
2     ---     7     ---     14     ---     0
2     ---     14     ---     15     ---     0
2     ---     21     ---     16     ---     0
2     ---     28     ---     17     ---     0
3     ---     7     ---     18     ---     0
3     ---     14     ---     19     ---     0
3     ---     21     ---     20     ---     0
3     ---     28     ---     21     ---     0
4     ---     4     ---     22     ---     0
4     ---     11     ---     23     ---     0
4     ---     18     ---     24     ---     0
4     ---     25     ---     25     ---     0
4     ---     2     ---     26     ---     0
5     ---     9     ---     27     ---     0
5     ---     16     ---     28     ---     0
5     ---     23     ---     29     ---     0
5     ---     30     ---     30     ---     0
6     ---     6     ---     31     ---     0
6     ---     13     ---     32     ---     0
6     ---     20     ---     33     ---     0
6     ---     27     ---     34     ---     0
7     ---     4     ---     35     ---     0
7     ---     11     ---     36     ---     0
7     ---     18     ---     37     ---     0
7     ---     25     ---     38     ---     0
8     ---     1     ---     39     ---     0
8     ---     8     ---     40     ---     0
8     ---     15     ---     41     ---     0
8     ---     22     ---     42     ---     0
8     ---     29     ---     43     ---     0
9     ---     5     ---     44     ---     0
9     ---     12     ---     45     ---     0
9     ---     19     ---     46     ---     0
9     ---     26     ---     47     ---     0
10     ---     3     ---     48     ---     0
10     ---     10     ---     49     ---     0
10     ---     17     ---     50     ---     0
10     ---     24     ---     51     ---     0
10     ---     31     ---     52     ---     0
The above entries cover all the dates in calendar year 2009, that is, Jan 2009 to Oct 2009 is covered by periods 10 to 52 and Nov 01 2009 to Dec 31 2009 is covered by period 1 to 9 of the following fiscal year 2010.
Inspite of making sure that all the days of 2009 are covered by periods 1 to 52. We are still unable to save the FYV.
Please help!
Susan

Hello, I am getting this error while saving the FSV. My FSV is based on Weeks. Below is what I am inputting for this. Other details are Calender Year - 2017, No. of posting periods - 53, checked year dependent. Also, I have FSV for previous years also where weeks are 52 but configured as 53. So, hope that this is not creating this issue. Solicit your early response.
Month
Day
Period
Year Shift
1
7
1
0
1
14
2
0
1
21
3
0
1
28
4
0
2
4
5
0
2
11
6
0
2
18
7
0
2
25
8
0
3
4
9
0
3
11
10
0
3
18
11
0
3
25
12
0
4
1
13
0
4
8
14
0
4
15
15
0
4
22
16
0
4
29
17
0
5
6
18
0
5
13
19
0
5
20
20
0
5
27
21
0
6
3
22
0
6
10
23
0
6
17
24
0
6
24
25
0
7
1
26
0
7
8
27
0
7
15
28
0
7
22
29
0
7
29
30
0
8
5
31
0
8
12
32
0
8
19
33
0
8
26
34
0
9
2
35
0
9
9
36
0
9
16
37
0
9
23
38
0
9
30
39
0
10
7
40
0
10
14
41
0
10
21
42
0
10
28
43
0
11
4
44
0
11
11
45
0
11
18
46
0
11
25
47
0
12
2
48
0
12
9
49
0
12
16
50
0
12
23
51
0
12
30
52
0
12
31
1
+1
Thanks
Deepankar

How to find out list of variants in TVARV table

hi!
can anybody can guide me on the following issues? plz
How to list all variants in TVARV table?
How to find out any Z* programs that writes to TVARV table, using the variant name?
How to find out the programs which are reads the TVARV data into a program variant?
Thanks & Regards,
vijay

Or some help might be useful:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c0/98037ae58611d194cc00a0c94260a5/frameset.htm
Regards,
Subramanian V.

Free goods determination in variant article

Hi ALL!!!!
The issue is regarding IS-Retail. In case of order processing with variant article free goods is not getting active. The item category of the parent article is TAG and for the variants is TAN. When I am maintaining freegoods for the variant then also its not getting picked up nor when I am maintaining free goods for the parent article.
Please suggest
regards

Hi
1) In IS-Retail Variant article as called Generic Articles (retail terminalogy).
2) Come to freegoods, In retail you can use promotion concept to maintain the freegoods determination for generic artilces and it should test with POS system.
regards
satish

Creation of a new costing variant to cost production orders

Hi all,
Currently the business is only able to cost a vehicleu2019s production order at the standard cost value which is determined at the start of the year.
During the year a number of the purchasing values will be updated with a new contract price, this increase will not be reflected in the standard cost until the end of the year.
The business would like a new costing variant which will cost an already created vehicle in SAP by its production order at the u201CCurrent Costu201D (current purchasing info record value).
It will need to be calculated in the following way:
u2022Purchased material - at purchase cost from info record (see below for applicable exchange rate).
u2022Manufactured material - child material to be at purchase cost (from info record). Routing cost (labour\overhead, etc) at current criteria.
u2022No allowance for CPI. [WHAT_ DOES_CPI_MEAN_?]
u2022Exchange rate: ideally, fields are provided to input exchange rate. If this is not possible then apply current monthu2019s exchange;
u2022FRAu2019s - current rate from the info record.
u2022Summary of total material cost by origin code with ability to drill down to line level.
u2022The output of the report will need to be similar to the layout of a production order but with only the current value displayed.
We have some problems to understand this request: we don't know the transaction which is used by the users to costificate a production order and what does it mean "CPI". We are not sure on the feasibility of the costing variant requested because it must consider both actual costs and standard costs.
It should costificate in this way:
(Actual Cost of Row Material * Bom's standard qty) + (Standard price * Standard production time (in the routings).
Could you help us?
Many thanks to all of you, best regards.
Alanis

You can create a new costing variant with a valuation variant that points to inforecords for material prices. Go to OKKN t-code and create the required configuration and start using the new costing variant to measure the current cost of making vehicles.

Creation of new Print Program & Variant for new Correspondence Type created

Dear Friends,
I have created 2 new Correspondence Types in SAP as SAP61 (Vendor Debit Note) & SAP62 (Vendor Credit Note) by copying SAP09 (Internal Document) properties like itu2019s Name of the print program - RFKORD30 & Name of variant - SAP09.
We are facing problem when we execute print program in F.64 for SAP09 it is coming same like SAP61 or SAP62. Actual script & print values of SAP09 are replaced by SAP61 or SAP62.
Please suggest us how we can differentiate both SAP09 & SAP61/62. Because we use these correspondences for different purposes like SAP09 gives the information for the Line items in the Document whereas SAP61/62 gives the information of vendor line item weather it is debit or credit entry.
Your kind co-operation in this matter is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Naveen Kumar.P

"Assigned the from to the company code - progam in V_001F_B"
Check 'Form ID' field in this IMG transaction against the program and form that you have created.
I am assuming there are 2 lines with same entries but different form IDs.
Or there are 2 lines with the same entries but different CoCodes (seem to remember that the CoCode is not taken into account as a key in certain programs - not logical i know but remembered a previous issue I had many moons ago - could be to do with the blank entry for CoCode field if there is one being picked up by the program before the entry that has your CoCode).
Now check the variant attached and Form ID in step 'Created new program variants in SA38'
Ensure the correct program and variant are attached in step OB78.
My assumption is Form ID is the key.
Hope this helps

Multiple Fiscal Year Variant in the same client in SEM-BCS...

I have already looked at some earlier threads relating to this but didn't get a convincing answer to what I would like to know.
We have had a working SEM-BCS system with fiscal year variant K4. There was no need for defining leading fiscal year variant and none was defined. SAP, by default takes, K4 as the leading fiscal year variant.
Now there is a requirement for going on a different fiscal year variant for which we have created another databasis (there were a few other reasons besides these) with the same InfoObjects that we used earlier but with different fixed parameters, one of which is fisc year variant V9. Soon, we started experiencing bizarre dumps in the configuration which ultimately convinced me to define a leading fiscal year variant. I was reluctant to do so because there is a lot of old data (which will become 'historical' from new data basis point of view) from the working system on K4 that would still need to be reported on even when we have new BCS solution in the new fiscal year variant V9. That is not going away. There is a need to keep the old data for reporting (hence the rationale for a different data basis among a few others).
Since earlier Master Data was configured in the old fisc year variant K4, now I have defined the leading fiscal year variant as V9 so that MDF can appropriately identify the period dependency.
I would like to know if any of you have had an unexpected behavior from the system going forward. Does the system dump out when you try to read the old data (from earlier K4).
I have tried to explain the dilemma as clearly and succinctly as possible but if you need more clarifications, please do let me know.
I would really appreciate your help in this.

Is your requirement is that K4 to be changed to Z5.
The best way you can do it is in the transformation. Instead of directmapping,
Write a code like this in the trransformation to the cube
If SOURCE FIELD - 0FISCVAR eq 'k4'.
SOURCE FIELD - 0FISCVAR = 'Z5'.
I dont think we can change th data in the query being displayed. we can change the keyfigure values in query by frmulas etc...
but for a characteristic, i think we will be able to restrict bt not change the value.
to obtain the requirement, w have to get the data change before query designer that is in the cube leve.
Hope this helps,
Sri...

KE28 Variants

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for