KE30 report is not matching with KE24

Hi Experts,
In our Production System erroneously, COPA documents were archived during September 2010 (01.09.2010 to 16.09.2010).
Subsequently, these documents were re-created by SAP Standard transactionsKE4S and KE4SFI.
Before and after restoring COPA documents, KE30 report is not tallying when we compare with KE24 - especially for September 2010 month. It isworking fine for other months - like August and October 2010.
In view of the above, could you kindly provide us possible solution to make KE30 will work even for September 2010 - similar to other months.
Thanks & Regards,
Satya Srinivas

I'm not sure whether your KE30 report accesses summarization level data or not, but if you do use summarization levels in CO-PA, follow the steps below to correct this issue. Archive/Deletion removes line items from CE1XXXX but segment table CE3XXXX is not updated at this time which will cause the inconsistency. so..
Rebuild Segment table CE3XXXX for the complete fiscal year with program RKEREO31 (Reorganization of Segment Level - Actual) ..refer to SAP note 93051 for the complete guidelines..
(ii) After this, rebuild summarization levels using transaction KEDU as background job.
I have personally done these steps few times at different clients, you need to plan this properly and execute couple of times in testing system to estimate the run time and check the differences.
Regards,
Ganesh

Similar Messages

  • KE30 Summary balance not matching with KE24 line item total

    Hello Experts,
    My client's are having one KE30 report and there are about 15-18 rows in the output.  About 12 rows agrees with the KE24 line item report and they inturn matches with FBL3N balance.  However, the balance 3-6 rows does not agree with the KE24 line items report.
    For the difference rows :
    The KE30 balance   USD 210000
    The KE24 balance   USD 229000
    The FBL3N balance USD 229000
    The KEAT figures    USD 229000
    Can anybody confirm which settings are missing, if any.
    Thanks & Regards.
    Vikas.

    Hi
    I think you will have to reconcile on case to case basis and identify the causes...
    It may also happen that some docs are posted with some blank chars and hence they are not featured in KE30 based on the selection parameters given during execution of report
    To mind, only these 2 points come
    1. Define a report restricting to chars like Comp Code, currency type (if applicable), version =0 and period... Do Not restrict on any other char and execute the report.. It has to match with KE24
    2. In the 5 to 6 lines where you have this issue, try to drilldown on each possible char in KE30 for these rows... and match each of this value with KE24... you will come to know where the problem lies
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • The creditors report is not matching with the G/L account

    Hi Gurus,
    The creditors report is not matching with the G/L account ,where i can go and find out the differences ?
    Please give me advice,
    I will assign points
    Thanks&Regards,
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    There could be three reasons.
    1. You may have more than one recon accounts for different vendor groups. So, you need to select all the GL accounts when reconcile with Vendor balances.
    2. You may have some special GL transactions, which may post to different reconciliation accounts. Please check Special GL transactions (Down payments so on)
    3. Your vendor recon accounts may be changed after some postings. Please check. If changed, you need to select these GLs also for reconciliation with vendor balances.
    Hope this will help you. If not clear please reply, I will explain you.
    Pl. assign points if useful.
    Thanks

  • India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance

    We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
    After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
    Please help.
    Regards
    Suresh

    user702249 wrote:
    We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
    After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
    Please help.
    Regards
    SureshPlease do not post duplicates -- India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.

  • Investment order reporting does not match with AM

    Hello,
    We are exectuing two reports 1) internal order report( for investment order) and asset history sheet.
    Both the report figures should match. but due to some reason the internal order report shows less value than asset history sheet.
    What can be the possible reason for the differences.
    BR,
    Zulfikar

    Hi
    Check whether the sales order creation date and actually when you created the delivery ? if say u created the sales order yesterday with yesterday date as delivery date and carried out delivery process to day means. The delivery date in the delivery process will be today date in that case delivery date wont match with sales order. This is one case like that so many cases are there.
    Material might not be confirmed etc....
    Regards,
    Mullai

  • GL Balance Report output not Matching with Material Stock

    Hi,
    Can we Match Reports MB5B (Stock on Posting Date)  and S_ALR_87012301 (G/L Account Balance)???
    Till March these reports are matching but from April 11, data not matching..
    In tcode MB5B, we are looking Valuated Stock of Materials and in tcode s_alr_87012301 showing balances, which were matching earlier..
    Plz guide...

    Dear:
              Execute the stock GL in FS04 to track the history of changes made to it. It is quite possible that post automatically tick was changed and some direct posting were made against this GL which ultimately caused discrepancies. If track is showing post automatic tick changed then it means some direct posting were made to it, Note the period in which it was changed and analyze the posting against this GL in that time span.
    Regards

  • 0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

    Hi All
    We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
    R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)   with the
    Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
    But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table  which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
    Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
    FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
    Thanks
    KPK

    In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data. 
    Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
    Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report -  G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
    I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link.  Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
    Please advise ..
    Thanks
    KPK

  • F_IT_01 does not match with FAGLGVTR

    Hello All,
    What is the reason for report  F_IT_01 not matching with FAGLGVTR
    Please advice

    Hello,
    I would not advise you to do such things in your environment.2 mins is very less time how could you be so sure a 2 min query is bad. And your second point is totally baseless it wouldtake a query a fraction of secondto read 1000 rows.My answer would be please
    dont implement.
    If you want to test below query might achieve the first requirement, I have not tested it please treat this query as hint and optimize or add anything if required.
    If you schedule this query through agent for every 2 mins or 5 mins .It can achieve.But some query takes more time to rollback than to finish scheduling this would lead to unstable environment
    USE MASTER
    IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TEMPDB.SYS.ALL_OBJECTS WHERE NAME LIKE '#KILL_CONNECTION')
    BEGIN
    DROP TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
    END
    CREATE TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
    SESSION_ID INT
    ,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME BIGINT
    ,START_TIME DATETIME
    INSERT INTO #KILL_CONNECTION
    SELECT
    SESSION_ID
    ,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME
    ,START_TIME
    FROM SYS.DM_EXEC_REQUESTS
    WHERE TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME > 7200 AND SESSION_ID > 50
    DECLARE @SESSION_ID BIGINT
    DECLARE @CMD VARCHAR(1000)
    DECLARE KILL_CONNECTION CURSOR FOR
    SELECT SESSION_ID
    FROM #KILL_CONNECTION
    OPEN KILL_CONNECTION
    FETCH NEXT FROM KILL_CONNECTION INTO @SESSION_ID
    WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
    BEGIN
    SET @CMD = 'KILL ' + @SESSION_ID
    EXECUTE (@CMD)
    END
    CLOSE KILL_CONNECTION
    DEALLOCATE KILL_CONNECTION godrop table #Kill_connection
    Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

  • AR01 balance is not matching with FAGLL03 balance between the segments

    Dear Consultants
    I am facing one problem in Assets Reconciliation. I.e, the balance which is showing in AR01 report is not matching with FAGLL03 report for P & M Assets.
    In my client I have two segment . 1000 and 2000.            
    As per that reports of both AR01 and FAGLL03  effect is  as follows.
    1.     GL value is showing more by Rs.54,13,516.34  with  AR01 in 1000 segment in P &M at
                    31.03.2009
    2.     GL value is showing Less by Rs.54,13,516.34  with AR01 in 2000 segment  in P & M at
                    31.03.2009
    After uploading the legacy balances as on 30.06.2008,
    1.SAP Segmental Trail Balance has been tallied with Segmental Trial balance as 30.06.2008
    2.Except this P & M balances, remaining all assets were tallied between FAGLL03 and
      AR02 segment wise.
    3.acquisitions during the year also tallied and Over all at company code level balance from 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 also tallied for all Assets including this P &M.
    Cross check points:
    1.I have checked the cost center , profit center and segments assignment u2013ok
    2.I have tallied Profit center wise AR01 and FAGLL03. except, this P &M
    3. No Manual Entries has been posted
    So pls suggest me what could be possible reasons for this
    any how. my client maintained the legacy system till 31.03.2009 along with SAP. now as per Oracle we are matching this values. so ,what I am thinking is ,to match the balances in P &M between the segments, Shall I post the JV between these gment? because , as on  31.03.2009 legachy value is matching with AR01 values. 
    --Only problem between Legacy value and GL Value.
    --Depreciation not yet posted.
    --client is ready to pass required adjustement entries after posting the depreciation as on 31.03.2009 to 
      match with legacy balance
    --So ,I dont think it is not problem  if post the manual entry in Asset GL to match the balance between legacy and Fagll03 report
    --Over all Comapny code level plant and Machinery values is tallied with Legachy value
    early reply will be very highly appreicated
    Regards
    Edited by: Ramatulasi Marivada on May 27, 2009 10:33 AM

    Hello,
    Run ABST2 to know the difference between GL and Asset Accounting.
    Hope you must have reset the reconciliation accounts of assets OAMK and posted all the relevant GL asset balances. Note that initial asset balances loaded in AA will not automatically be transferred to GL. You need to pass the JVs.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

    Dear Gurus,
    Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
    Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
    Can U help me in this Regard.
    Ur Responses are most appreciated.

    Hey Pathak,
                        The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
    Hope U got my Point.

  • Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

    Hi,
    Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
    I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
    Could you suggest on this issue.
    Thank you for your cooperation.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

  • Accounts Payable Reconciliation Account does not match with sap report

    Hello Folks,
    I have problem with AP reconciliation account, that the balances in FS10N for a particular Company Code for particular reconciliation account balance do not match with the report run to show the vendor  balances in local currency (report tcode F.98). Balance does not match for last posting period of the FY.
    I have tried looking all the vendors in that particular GL recon account and ran the report, but still it i wast able to find out anything. May be Special GL transaction posting be there, but how to check that is there any spl gl transaction it there in the recon account.
    I this to be solved by tonight, all the inputs will be very much appreciated and point will be assigned for sure.
    Thanks you all.

    Hi,
    In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
    The reconsilation account form the Vendor
    The G/L account where to posting is created on.
    It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
    The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
    It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
    Paul

  • Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

    Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
    Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
    1. We need to update records for April- May.
    2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
    Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
    Regards

    hi ELI
    i have checked the follwoing secnarios
    1. funds management deactivated.
    2. one document posted  with amount10000
    3. funds management activated.
    4. we have executed FMN0
    here no document is selected after execution.
    Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
    Regards

  • Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

    Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
    Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
    Thanks

    is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
    if then,
    From Front-end:
    Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
    From Database side:
    1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
    2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
    Is that BI-Apps project?
    btw, whtz ur name?

  • Trail balance is not matching with fagll03 report

    friends,
    our trial balance is showing one value and fagllo3 individual gl is showing another value, particularly in entry view it is showing other value, it is showing some small difference. is there any program to match trail and fagll03.
    regards,

    Hi Team,
    Greetings for the Day,
    I have the same issue, please suggest me on this.
    Trial Balance report for period 01-09, is not matching with the report from FAGLL03.
    I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this, thanks.
    Thanking in Advance,
    Raghav.
    [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for