Keep exported image size in HTML as shown in PDF

I have many inline formulas (imported from Word file via using mathtype) in PDF article made by ID. But when I export the articles as HTML, the images for formulas become much larger than shown in PDF version. How can i keep the exported images to the same size as they are shown the PDF file? I know I can edit the html file to specify image size, but that is the ideal work flow.
Thank you.

Hi Eric,
If i'm getting you right. you have the formulas placed as the images.
So, to keep the size fixed, In HTML export Options in image tab keep the image size as fixed.
Snapshot to refer:
Now you have image of same size as it appears in InDesign.

Similar Messages

WEB module export image size

Team, I am
exporting just two images from the Web Mo
dule...using the basis HTML
gallery template.
The original image size is 4972K (4.9Mb)
After I select export in the web module, the resulting image is around
200K in the content\images\large directory.
I have the "Large Images" Quality slider at 100
Is is the case...that no matter what...the image will be manipulated or reduced in size by the web module engine?
I would like the original image to be exported out to the content\images\large directory.
Is this possible?
I was just on phone with support...close to two hours...disconnected twice...but the phone support folks were not aware of what I am doing.
I am using LR 3.3 in Windows...if that matters.
Thank You,
-Rich O
[email protected]

Rich,
RichO2010 wrote:
Beat, I have not made any adjustments. Not sure where "Image Pages" are. But, under the Web module, I have tried several "Large Images" quality settings under the "Output Settings"
You find this setting under the Appearance section:
I am getting the sense that no matter what...the LR Webgallery engine wants to "optimize" the images for web output.
I just want the people that visit the site, the ability to download the original image...unaltered.
I have not found a way to go beyond 2071 pixels for image width in Web Gallery.
From what i am reading so far, I think I should just let the galley engine do its work. Then come back and upload the original images under the content\images\large (or whatever the output destination might be).
That might be a way to achieve what you want. There might be side-effects regarding borders, watermarks etc.
Beat

Should I keep my image size slightly larger for a better quality?

I set my images at 60% quality JPG files out of photoshop which seems to give a very nice representation.
I set up a site to take a full screen, so I expect it to be larger on a bigger screen then what I see on mine.
I figured to keep every image actual size at about 25% bigger when the finlal needed size in the layout, so if the site is ever on the bigger screen then images have some stored resolution to be enlarged and accomodate an increase in size.
So all of mine images are scaled at about 75%.
Is it a good practise or things don't work this way in Flash?
Perhaps it is better to keep the images to 100% (rather than importing intentially enlarges images) but make the maximum quality? Or both ways kind of work out?

there's no one way to handle images that's best for everyone. the larger your images, the less pixelated they'll appear when scaled (use smoothing) up but the larger their file size and the longer they'll take for a user to load.
you have to pick what satisfies your needs and works best for you.

How do I keep original image size in InDesign CS after changing image in Photoshop?

Here is an example of what I am talking about:
If I have an image in Indesign that is scaled to 50%. I want to go to Photoshop and reduce the image size by 50% so when I go back to InDesign and update the image the image will stay the same size in the box, but now show that the image is at 100%.
How do I get the image to remain the same size in the image box after altering the size in Photoshop?

> How do I get the image to remain the same size in the image box after altering the size in Photoshop?
You do so by upgrading to CS3.
Bob

Keep actual image size when rotating and exporting to PDF

When one rotates an image in a non-right angle in InDesign, the resulting image in the PDF, even if looks the same size of the original image when compared save for being rotated, actually shrink in size. That's noticieable when one saves the image from the PDF as the rotated image appears rotated inside the same size of the original, rather than being larger. I fear it may cause some quality loss at print. Is there any workaround around it?
Or it is just a previsualization glitch and the file prints normal? (as while importing the PDF in Illustrator seems to keep the original resolution of the image)

Peroyomas wrote:
Or it is just a previsualization glitch and the file prints normal?
I can't see a difference in size between two copies of the same image when one is rotated in a non-right angle and the other is at zero rotation.
From the way your question is worded, I'm not sure what you are doing.
Peroyomas wrote:
…even if looks the same size…actually shrink in size.
If it looks the same size, what makes you think it is not?

I am trying to get a photo printed in canvas, b0 size. The original photo is 5472 x 3648 px, 193x128 cm. What happens is: if I adjust the photo in Photoshop it keeps the image size but if I import it into Lightroom to adjust it there, the photo is being

I have checked all the settings when importing..the maximum size Lightroom will keep it is 30x 40cm... Lightroom is doing it to all the photos I import into the program.
I need to be able to export my image from Lightroom in its original size and stop Lightroom of making it smaller.. Any clue on what should I try?
Thanks!
Carol

Digital files don't have sizes in centimeters or inches, meters or yards. They have only pixels. If LR is not changing the number of pixels, it is not changing the digital image. When the image is printed, the number of pixels packed into every inch has a large effect on the quality of the print. This is the pixels per inch number, or "ppi". For a smooth print paper it is generally accepted that 300 ppi produces optimum quality, but for canvas a lower ppi, as low as 150 even, will do. Unfortunately, your camera puts a tag on the digital file which sets a default ppi of only 72. The reason is very anachronistic and silly and is a hangover from 30 years ago when Apple monitors had a resolution of 72 dpi, a measure long ago abandoned. That tag is misleading because it gives the impression that a very large print can be made from the pixels just as they come from the camera (the smaller the ppi, the larger the print) and some beginners think that is the only size print that can be made. But that not true. It is only a default tag, a suggestion, and it can be disregarded or changed (LR changes it to 240 ppi) and any sized print made. The real, operative, ppi will be the pixel dimensions divided by the print dimensions. Your image with all its pixels (uncropped other than to the 1:1.4 paper ratio) will have an operative 93 ppi on b0 paper which is a bit low. I would suggest using LR's resize function to double it to 7296 pixels on the short side.

Exporting Image Sizes

When I make my movies, the images appear blury and yes I know it is because they are too small.
The thing I wanted to ask is is there a way to keep the size the image as it originally was, rather than having to adjust itself to match the dimention?

You could also use the built in hard drive publish services. Create two services, one for each location/size. Within each publish service, create a smart folder that refers to a single collection. Then dragging a photo to that one collection will queue the images for export in both services.
You'd still have to visit each of the services to click "publish."
Removing the images from the collection automatically deletes the from the hard drive on the next publish, also.
mh++

Export Image Size

Okay, this is driving me crazy, and I can't find the answer anywhere:
I'm working on a project that requires 300dpi JPGs at size 2.75" x 3.75".
When I look at the document size in document setup, it shows up as 2.75" x 3.75". So far, so good.
But when I try to export, the final image is 975 pixels by 1276 pixels. Which by my calculations ain't right. (Should wind up at 825 x 1125, no?)
When I change the units to pixels in the Document Setup window by the way it reads at 198 x 270.
Using CS3.
What am I missing here? Is there an easy fix?

Jack,
I'm working on a project that requires 300dpi JPGs at size 2.75" x 3.75".
When I look at the document size in document setup, it shows up as 2.75" x 3.75". So far, so good.
But when I try to export, the final image is 975 pixels by 1276 pixels. Which by my calculations ain't right. (Should wind up at 825 x 1125, no?)
Correct.
When I change the units to pixels in the Document Setup window by the way it reads at 198 x 270.
This corresponds to 72 PPI, which is 2.75" by 3.75" expressed in pixels/points; this just expresses the actual size regardless of resolution.
What am I missing here? Is there an easy fix?
Are you creating vector artwork to export as JPEG at 300 PPI? If so, just set the resolution as part of exporting.
Or are you working with a raster image (JPEG?) placed in Illy? If so, you cannot just change the resolution and expect the same quality.

Exported image size

I shoot a canon 30D which produces RAW files about 7mb. When I export the versions as full size Jpegs, they get knocked to around 250kb! What is going on? That seems like an extreme amount of compression to me. Any ideas as to what I am doing wrong? Thanks
HPL

Go into the export presets and have a look at both the output dimensions and the compression settings.
Ian

BUG: 16.0.1 Updating linked export image size does not update other dimension

Hi
Either this is a bug or I'm missing something.
1. In AI CS6 16.0.1 (32-bit), click "Save for Web and Devices"
2. Make sure W & H are linked
3. Make a change to Image width
4. Tab through to Image height - this should update? But it doesn't.
5. Tab through to Percentage - height remains unchanged, but width is reset to original value.
I thought height should update when I did this.
Now try this:
1. Cancel out of Save for W&D and come back in, then repeat Step 1 above
2. Unlink and immediately relink width and height using the chain button
3. Update width
4. Tab through to height and hey presto, it updates now.
So Save for W&D is not picking up the fact that "Retains original image proportions is checked" when the dialog is launched.
Can anyone confirm this?
Cheers
Richard

OK, this is a known bug. We'll take care of it! Thanks
See forum post:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4314172#4314172
Pattie

When I export from Lr to CS3 my image size is 8x12 roughly, why?

I shoot RAW with a 5d mark2 I export from lr to cs3 in my workflow. I am wanting to create a gallery wrap at an image size of 24x36, when I go to create my negative space my exported image size from Lr is only 8x12, why would that be? I don't know what to do or how to make my image larger without loosing quality? I have never noticed this before? Why is it doing this now?

It will be the settings in your export menu.
clsmithphoto wrote:
I shoot RAW with a 5d mark2 I export from lr to cs3 in my workflow. I am wanting to create a gallery wrap at an image size of 24x36, when I go to create my negative space my exported image size from Lr is only 8x12, why would that be? I don't know what to do or how to make my image larger without loosing quality? I have never noticed this before? Why is it doing this now?
Check this out for how to export: http://tv.adobe.com/search/?q=exporting

Trouble Exporting images in full size

I can't seem to export an image with the original file size. I have reset the export image size to original jpeg settings and every setting I can find and it still exports a small low resolution file.

The setting you are wanting to change is the "Size to" pull down menu,
Original size is the original size of the file as cropped, uncropped you get pixel for pixel or if you happen to crop in on a small area of the image you will only get a small file.
Fit within pixels, great for screen and video use, eg 1024x768 or 1920x1080 etc
Fit within inches/centimeters, great for preset print sizes and creating different presets for different printers, eg. 10"x10" this is where dpi comes into effect.
Percentage of original, smaller or larger.
note that these settings do not crop the image or change a 2:3 image to a16:9 image, rather they constrain the image to fit within the dimensions. eg, I have an album of images to go to 5"x7" prints, vertical and horizontals, first I have to crop to 5x7, then I export to a preset that is 7"x7" @300dpi, this contrains the exported images to 7"@300dpi (2100pixels) on the longest side.
Tony

Export JPEG size

Hi, can someone explain the following.
I've just exported some photos for printing in Lightroom and set the size to 100% and the JPEG quality to 100%. On one photo the export size is 10.1Mb when I then open file and resave it, still keeping the image size the same & re-saving at 100% JPEG quality the filesize drops to about 4Mb.
I've used Pixelmator to resave the file. Any ideas why this would be? Why does LR save such a large file - does it use a different algorithm?
Cheers for the replies,
Matt

There are lots of ways to compress jpegs. The 100% setting in your other app likely has no real relation to 100% in Lightroom. The app might be subsampling the chroma channels as lots of jpeg libraries do. Also, you are resaving a jpeg, which because of the way jpeg compression works, always leads to generational losses in quality. This usually goes hand in hand with loss in filesize. Lastly, there rarely is any advance in perceived quality going from 90% to 100% in Lightroom.

LR3-Library-Export-Image Resizing: Specifying Pixel WxH results in different WxH - tips please?

This is a multi-dimensional question (he he). I understand my problem is related to the original/developed WxH ratio. If the pixel WxH I spec in Export-Image Resizing doesn't match that developed proportion, the results are not what I want. In other words LR3 keeps the original/developed proportion and not what I want for that export. Ok, so I just answered my own question - but..... please give me some library or export tips for doing what I want to do.
What I do:
1 - I edit my images in RAW and like to keep them in their original proportions from my Canon camera as that is the proportion of HxW i use the most
2 - Later, if the image is really good (at least I like it), I may export it for different purposes and then may choose or require a different proportion.
3 - I would really like to not have to re-crop in Develop, then go back and Export, then go back to Develop and change it back to original.
Besides being tedious and time consuming, can anyone recommend a better way for me to do these "one off" exports (seems to happen more often lately) without screwing around in Develop and messing up my original work?
Background:
One of the reasons I do this is to create wallpapers for computers, for various printing/framing proportions, and then for web site situations. Windows XP (and I think the others) gets really slow if the program must re-size an image for wallpaper (why? go ask Mr. Gates... better get in line). So to keep performance high, it is best to create the image in the exact pixel dimensions of the monitor. This is always some weird number and not like anything else I do this for. The other reason is for a quick, custom print job for someone who wants an odd matting setup for framing (don't ask). This results in odd proportions. Regarding the web.... well smooshing a pic into a column etc. etc... Now while I am proud of my art and understand LR3 will expect me to re-crop to preserve my artistic brilliance, but really..... I would be happy with a proportional crop from the parallel sides of the offending dimension.
Also, when I spec a dimension, shouldn't the DPI gray out? What am not understanding here?
One last request: please give me tips on solving for world peace... this one really bugs me.
Thanx in advance!

Bruce,
As you correctly noticed, the WxH ratio in export represents a canvas, into which the exported image is fit. Here are some illustrations on what the different settings mean:
For what you are trying to achieve, you have to crop the image to the correct dimensions before doing the export. If I had to do it, I would create virtual copies of the original image as the last step and give each virtual copy its own crop, then export the virtual copies.
Bruce in Philly wrote:
Also, when I spec a dimension, shouldn't the DPI gray out? What am not understanding here?
The DPI resolution has no meaning for the size of the resulting image if you specify pixels in your export dimensions. But the resolution tag is written into the image, which might affect the way an image is printed, depending on the printing application.
But if you specify your export dimensions in inches or cm, the resolution together with the dimensions in inch/cm determine the size of the resulting image in pixels. I.e. if you specify 5x7" and 300DPI, your exported images size will be 1500x2100 pixels.
Beat

"image size could not be verified - operation not performed" when I go to restore to my hard drive. What do?

I want to restore my disk image using disk utility. I keep getting "image size could not be verified - operation not performed" when I go to restore to my hard drive. What do?
I would like to partition my disk but it says I have to restore my disk image first so that files can be moved. This is really obnoxiously hard for someone who is only moderately tech savy. Any help is appreciated, but please no links to 3rd party sites. I would like to keep this with the software I already have.
Thanks ^_^

Sorry nobody has replied yet, but how was this disk image made?
"Try Disk Utility
1. Insert the Mac OS X Install disc, then restart the computer while holding the C key.
2. When your computer finishes starting up from the disc, choose Disk Utility from the Installer menu at top of the screen. (In Mac OS X 10.4 or later, you must select your language first.)
*Important: Do not click Continue in the first screen of the Installer. If you do, you must restart from the disc again to access Disk Utility.*
3. Click the First Aid tab.
4. Select your Mac OS X volume.
5. Click Repair Disk, (not Repair Permissions). Disk Utility checks and repairs the disk."
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106214
Then try a Safe Boot, (holding Shift key down at bootup), run Disk Utility in Applications>Utilities, then highlight your drive, click on Repair Permissions, reboot when it completes.
(Safe boot may stay on the gray radian for a long time, let it go, it's trying to repair the Hard Drive.)
If perchance you can't find your install Disc, at least try it from the Safe Boot part onward.

Keep exported image size in HTML as shown in PDF

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for