Keep multiple versions of Lightroom on one machine?

I have Lightroom 3 and am considering upgrading to Lightroom 5. I love Lightroom 3, and would like to keep it installed as backup / alternative. I inquired with purchase chat and was told that if I upgraded to 5 that 3 would be deactivated. Is this correct? They seemed positive that if I upgraded to 5 my previous version would be deactivated. Maybe I won't like 5 as much. I love 3, and don't know that I 'need' 5, but I'm setting up a new machine so am upgrading or adding a lot of software right now as a part of that process.
If I'm going to lose 3, then I probably won't upgrade to 5. Why tempt fate and give up something that works well and that I know pretty well.

I cannot speak to any deactivating. However, the databases for v3 and v5 are not compatible. If you update your v3 database to a v5 database, LR3 will not be able to read it. No new databases created by LR5 will be able to be read by LR3.
In all honesty, I cannot think of a reason to stay with LR3 with v5.7 being available.
I know that v4 and v5 work fine side by side, so I don't see why v3 and v5 would behave any differently. Make a copy of your old catalog and update the copy to v5.

Similar Messages

Multiple version of Java on one machine

Is it possible to have multiple versions of Java co-exist on the same XP Pro machine?
Here is our scenario: we have apps that use Java 1.5, but we have one critical app that doesn't support that version yet. It has to use the 1.4 version. Is there a way to allow both versions to exist and be usable for their respective apps? If so, how?
Thank you.

I can't, however it's never a good idea to have
multiple versions of Java on one machine. Try and
standardise if possible. If OP used JAVA_HOME as you
often suggest, then he would be knackered wouldn't
he? JAVA_HOME can only point to one JDK. Your
advice is conflicting kaj.Nope. JAVA_HOME should always be defined in the start script/file for a java application, so it's not set per system. It's very common that companies have applications that requires different JDK/JRE versions, and it's usually very expensive to upgrade all applications (if it's possible at all). You can of course also alter the PATH variable if you want to in the script.
/Kaj

Is it possible to have two versions of Muse on one Machine? WhenI open Muse from my program menu in WIndows 7 it comes up the way I am used to. I did an upgrade a week or so ago and now I have an Adobe Muse CC 2014 on my desktop. WhenI open the applica

Is it possible to have two versions of Muse on one Machine? WhenI open Muse from my program menu in WIndows 7 it comes up the way I am used to. I did an upgrade a week or so ago and now I have an Adobe Muse CC 2014 on my desktop. WhenI open the application that way the GUI interface looksw totally different, more like Illustrator. What is that all about?

Since posting the above, I have resolved a sensible work-around in regard to ebookstores which prefer us to have separate accounts for our separate Adobe IDs.
However, I really would appreciate it if anyone here can confirm that a DRM controlled book does actually become associated with a particular Adobe ID account at the time of first download to Digital Editions on that PC/device.
Two large book stores have said using my account with them to download books to our two separate Adobe IDs is OK, but I don't want to find my husband is unable to open his downloaded books.
Thank you folks for any advice you can give,
Sue

I am having trouble activating my new version of Lightroom on one computer where it says it has been fully installed and it is stuck on 90% on my laptop. I tried phoning the helpline but was told the number dialled was incorrect but it is the one given o

I am having trouble activating my new version of Lightroom on one computer where it says it has been fully installed and it is stuck on 90% on my laptop. I tried phoning the helpline but was told the number dialled was incorrect but it is the one given on the Adobe help page. So what is the correct tel no for support?

carolinechx wrote:
i know the description may be a little bit too confusing
Mostly because you are not using any capital letters or paragraph returns and your post is difficult to read.

Hi there, I have a 2009 Macbook - running on OS X V.10.6.8... but I'm looking at upgrading the Operating System to V.10.10. Will your latest version of LIghtroom (the one I can currently get a free one month trial of from your site) work with Apple's late

Hi there, I have a 2009 Macbook - running on OS X V.10.6.8... but I'm looking at upgrading the Operating System to V.10.10. Will your latest version of LIghtroom (the one I can currently get a free one month trial of from your site) work with Apple's latest operating system - Yosemite V.10.10? Or will LR only work with V.10.7, 10.8 or 10.9?
Thanks, Seamus

Hey, problem solved. One of the drives was faulty. I erased the 2nd drive (which was showing up as the degraded raid slice), deleted the RAID set and restored the 2nd drive from a back-up disk image. After that, when I booted using 'option' I was presented with two boot disks but only one that worked. And when it did boot up only the reformatted disk was showing in Diskutil so I'm guessing the second one is knackered. With it still in place the server still wouldn't boot up from a full shutdown, but the moment it was removed it booted up no probs. Wakes up from sleep as well so it seems sorted.
So now just need to decide whether I'll bother with replacing the second drive or just use an external back-up. I have just bought a 1TB drive to back up to so will probably just go with that.
Btw, is there anyway I can test the drive I removed to see if can be saved?
Thanks for all your help. Your siamese twin comment was the push I need to erase the drive, I'd be holding off before that.
Warren

Need to run multiple copies of portal on one machine

This is a little involved to explain so I'll try to be clear.
Right now we have multiple developers working on our single copy of our portal
running on one machine at another location. No good can come of this and much
bad has already happened.
What we need is to be able to run different copies of our portal on different
ports on that same machine. Making a copy of the domain, changing the port and
java.io.tmpdir just confuses the first server started when the second one goes
RUNNING. Changing the Web Application name doesn't help either.
It looks like it's only our stuff that gets cornfused when I set up multiple servers
(user_projects/someDomain, user_projects/someDomain2) or multiple Web Apps (someDomain/beaApps/portalApp/webApp1,
someDomain/beaApps/portalApp/webApp2) since I can log into the console just fine.
The Big Idea is that we need each developer to have their own sandbox to play
in along with a demo/test copy of our software.
I've dug through the BEA docs and these news groups and have not found anything
that directly pertains to our situation. The BEA docs are particularly thin on
information pertaining to dealing with more than one developer or deploying to
remote machines.
Here are some of the particulars and constraints of our setup.
We are running WebLogic Platform 7.0.0.0 on a Solaris box at another physical
location. All access is via network. We have no root access for a variety of
reasons.
Oracle is used for our JDBC. No Pointbase.
Our WebApp has a servlet as the starting point.
We deploy an exploded version of our servlet and JSPs for convenience.
We edit and compile our java source on Windows boxes and FTP the .class and .jsp
files up to their proper places on the server.
Naturally, the ideal solution would be to have more than one machine for a server.
Right now we don't have that option.
Thanks for any help that you can give,
Jon Davis

Travis,
We tried something very similar to that. We're using WebLogic Platform 7.0.
We only have one login on this Solaris box.
I copied our domain (${HOME}/bea/user_projects/somePortal) to another directory
(${HOME}/bea/user_projects/somePortal-devel) and changed the relevant XML files
with regards to ports and installation directories.
Maybe the UID that each server runs as is the difference........
Maybe an earlier version of the products are more tolerant of this and what we're
experiencing is a "feature".
At least I know that my initial approach wasn't such a bad idea :)
Thanks,
Jon
"travis wissink" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Jon,
We do this with very little issues. I’ll take a stab at putting this
into words.
I suggest that you have the developers run their own instance from their
own Solaris
user home directory. So in /home/travis make a directory bea/app (/home/travis/bea/app)
in the bea/app directory copy the applications, bin, StartPortal.sh,
StopPortal.sh,
and config directory from your current application, probably /opt/bea/wlportal4.0/.
Then make sure that your scripts (in the developers home directory)
all reference
jar files in the /opt/bea/{wlportal4.0 and wlserver6.1} directory's.
Next go
through the /home/travis/bea/app/config/portalDomain/{config.xml & *.sh},
/home/travis/bea/app/bin/unix/*.sh,
and /home/travis/bea/app/application/portalDomain/{applicationDir}/WEB-INF/web.xml
and start and stop scripts to change all “application” directory references
to
relative pathing from the /home/travis/app/bea directory also change
all references
of the 7501 and 7502 ports to another port for each developer.
Hope this is readable and helps
-travis
"Jon Davis" <[email protected]> wrote:
This is a little involved to explain so I'll try to be clear.
Right now we have multiple developers working on our single copy ofour
portal
running on one machine at another location. No good can come of this
and much
bad has already happened.
What we need is to be able to run different copies of our portal ondifferent
ports on that same machine. Making a copy of the domain, changing the
port and
java.io.tmpdir just confuses the first server started when the second
one goes
RUNNING. Changing the Web Application name doesn't help either.
It looks like it's only our stuff that gets cornfused when I set upmultiple
servers
(user_projects/someDomain, user_projects/someDomain2) or multiple Web
Apps (someDomain/beaApps/portalApp/webApp1,
someDomain/beaApps/portalApp/webApp2) since I can log into the console
just fine.
The Big Idea is that we need each developer to have their own sandbox
to play
in along with a demo/test copy of our software.
I've dug through the BEA docs and these news groups and have not found
anything
that directly pertains to our situation. The BEA docs are particularly
thin on
information pertaining to dealing with more than one developer or deploying
to
remote machines.
Here are some of the particulars and constraints of our setup.
We are running WebLogic Platform 7.0.0.0 on a Solaris box at another
physical
location. All access is via network. We have no root access for avariety
of
reasons.
Oracle is used for our JDBC. No Pointbase.
Our WebApp has a servlet as the starting point.
We deploy an exploded version of our servlet and JSPs for convenience.
We edit and compile our java source on Windows boxes and FTP the .class
and .jsp
files up to their proper places on the server.
Naturally, the ideal solution would be to have more than one machine
for a server.
Right now we don't have that option.
Thanks for any help that you can give,
Jon Davis

Two versions of Robo on one machine

I have RoboInfo 5 and RoboHelp 7 installed on my computer.
RoboInfo publishes to RoboEngine on Win 2000 server. RoboHelp 7
publishes to RoboHelp 7 Server on Windows 2003 server.
I recently upgraded to a newer computer. We re-installed
RoboHelp and then later installed RoboInfo again. Since doing this,
I'm not able to publish our RoboHelp projects. The server crashed,
and so far we haven't been able to get it going again.
Don't know if it had anything to do with re-installing the
software, but I think I remember reading somewhere in the forums
about conflicts that can arise between two versions of Robo on the
same machine. Is this a possibility, and is it recommended that
they be installed on different machines?
It is interesting that now in my RoboHelp projects folder,
the .xpj project icons show the RoboInfo icon, not the RH7 icon
(and RoboInfo was installed last).

There can be conflicts between different versions but you had
both working OK before. I think the problem here is the order in
which you installed them.
As with most software that permits multiple versions to run,
the installation procedure is earliest first.

Can I have two versions of Safari on one machine?

The question first, then the explanation for the question: Can I have both Safari 5 and Safari 6 on my machine and run them at the same time?
I hate Safari 6 & 7 because they combine the search and URL into one bar, which really annoys me. It requires an extra step when I type in the direct URL I want, because instead of returning the URL, it goes to a search page, and then I have to click the site I want. Annoying. So I have not upgraded from Safari 5 on my iMac, which I use nearly all the time. I have tried Firefox because it still has the search and URL boxes separate, but I also like the little orange arrow in Safari 5 that quickly takes me back to my original search when I've ended up on rabbit trails in my searching and I want to go back to where I was -- Firefox does not have this. (I dislike Firefox in general, anyway.)
However, now I'm finding that some websites are beginning to warn me that my browser (Safari 5) is too old and may not work properly. Now I have found a site for which indeed that is true -- a site I regularly use for my job, and a company which says they will no longer offer support for issues on Safari 5. One screen is split into two, and I could always scroll the two sides separately, but after an update to the site, now they will not scroll separately. I have a MacBook Air, which I rarely use, and tested the same page on Safari 6 -- it works on Safari 6. Thus, the company will refuse to help me and tell me to just update my browser.
I really like Safari, EXCEPT for the new versions' combined search/URL bar, so I want to keep using Safari 5. Thus, I want to know if I can have both Safari 5 and 6 on my machine at all, and if so, then I want to know if I can have them both open at the time, for example, if I give them different names (Safari 5 and Safari 6, rather than just Safari).
This is for my iMac, which is running Lion 10.7.5

>>I could not see this reply in Safari 5, neither by refreshing the page nor by clicking "Latest reply," which did nothing.
That's a very common issue with the software that runs these discussions, and usually nothing to do with the browser. Pasting a single character reply, often reveals the missing item(s); as does viewing the thread without signing in first.

Can you run multiple versions of Message on one computer, i.e. one for each phone line on our account?

Does anyone know if you can run more than one Message+ on one computer, one for each of our phones?

CATTULLOS
Great question! The way to do it is, you will need to open up multiple browsers. (one for each phone number) The only thing you would need to do is log into www.vzw.com for each individual number to be able to send the text messages. Keep us posted let us know if this helps.
JorgeO_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Wondering if different versions can reside on one machine

Hello.
I have a complex but currently working setup on my win-xp/32 bit sp3 computer.
I have used photoshop since CS and am currently using CS3 extended.
Here's the complex part. I then discovered I'd like a few other programs and opted for Design Premium CS3 as it was more cost effective even though I had photoshop CS3 extended. It all is happy working together (and I don't think there's a reason it shouldn't).
What I'd like to do now, is install photoshop CS4 extended.
Will photoshop CS4 play nicely with DP CS3? I ask because I know there are so many common files and things that get shared between components that I'd hate to see something conflict where the colour picker in PCS4 for example is different and suddenly the one in say, Flash has changed to the "new" palette.
Even stranger still, would it be possible to leave photoshop CS3 on the computer as well? I know this may seem odd, but if I share this computer with people who don't need CS4 and are comfortable with their workflow. I on the other hand need the latest ACR so I have to upgrade. That again brings me to wonder if installing the latest ACR will "foul up" CS3 and it's ACR.
I know this may have been discussed at some point in the past as CS4 has been available for some time, but I thought my combination of programs and variations might make this situation unique.
Thanks in advance for any advice you can offer.

Not specific to your versions, but I had PS 4, 5, 7 and CS all on the same machine for various reasons. All ran fine. Now, the only little thing was that file types, like PSD, were affiliated with CS (then my latest version), but that did not affect anything.
With some programs, like Adobe Encore, there is a direct link to PS, Edit in Photoshop, and a few people have run afoul when they installed PS CS4, but wanted the Edit in Photoshop call to open CS3. It was a simple matter of just changing the file affiliation for .PSD (the format that Encore Menus are done in) to CS3 - fixed.
Other than that, I have never heard of any issues, but like I said, different versions.
Also, and this applies to Premiere Pro CS3 & CS4, but might carry over to other Adobe programs: if one has PrPro CS3 installed, then installs PrPro CS4, and THEN uninstalls PrPro CS3, some necessary parts of PrPro CS4 are deleted. The trick is to just do a Repair Install of PrPro CS4 and all is fixed. There were obviously some folders/files common to both versions, and removing CS3 took those out. I'd guess that Adobe has plans on making sure that similar does not happen with CS5, but that is only a guess.
Good luck, and wish that I had something specific to the versions in your question,
Hunt

Problems with Multiple versions of java on one computer

Hi, i current installed 1.3.1_08 on my xp machine and then 1.4.2. I want my "java" command to be using the 1.4.2 version. I try to run some 1.4 native java applets on my xp machine but they fail to run due to the java command being from version 1.3.1_08. I changed both the path and java_home variables in xp to my 1.4.2 installation, but still nothing changes. help plz??

%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;C:\Program Files\j2sdk_nb\j2sdk1.4.2\bin
java version "1.3.1_08"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1_08-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.1_08-b03, mixed mode)

Multiple Creative Cloud accounts on one machine?

Is there any problem doing this?

Only one user ID may be active at a time, so user A will need to sign out of the Cloud before user B may sign in

Multiple versions of FCP on one system

Hi guys just a quick question. I have FCP 5 installed on my mac. I am about to purchase Final Cut Studio 2, meaning FCP 6 will be installed on my system too.
Does this mean I will have to uninstall FCP 5 first or will I basically have two FCP's on my system. My only worry is that installing FCP 6 will overwrite/destroy a project that I'm currently editing on FCP 5?
Any suggestions or help on in?
Also is Final Cut Studio 2 compatible with OSX 10.4.11?
Thanks!!

When you install FCS 2 the higher version of FCP 6 will replace your installation of FCP 5.
You will not lose project files.
Also is Final Cut Studio 2 compatible with OSX 10.4.11?
Mac OS X 10.4.9 or later.

[SOLVED]Multiple servers/services with only one machine

Hello,
First of all, thank you for taking time to read this post.
Long story short: I had a machine laying around so i decided i would use it as a router/wireless access point since my isp router isn't working so well, but since the machine is not working anymore, and i don't have the resources(a.k.a. money) to fix it, i decided to use my main machine instead and make my laptop my main machine.
I have been reading the arch wiki regarding how to make a router and a wireless access point, but then i remembered something, what if i decide i need another server(http/https, ftp, NAS, IRC) which i might want, could i use virtualbox?
So my question is: can i have my computer with arch serving as a router + wireless access point and on the same machine, virtual machines with arch running other services? If i kept the files from this servers, like the www folder, of ftp folder, on the host machine would this be a security risk? This not intended for a enterprise environment, only here at home.
Thank you.
Last edited by jantonio2992 (2013-12-03 17:12:24)

ewaller wrote:
jantonio2992 wrote:Ok, so i can run everything in this machine. Can i still use this machine as a main machine (using virtual machines to test apps and its configs)? Or that might make me break the system?
That would depend on the traffic If it is just for you or your LAN, probably not a problem (unless you are streaming video to a bunch of machines). <Sarcasm>OTOH, unlike others, you might want try to run an entire national health care sign-up site on it * </Sarcasm>
* Note ... I have no concept as to the real architecture of the Affordable Health Care Act web site.
Edit: Too slow.
Sorry i didn't see you answer befores i posted my last. It would be only for my Lan, only serve i would run to the Internet would be SSH.. And no streaming video

Can I use multiple versions of FireFox on one PC?

- I use 5.0 for most things
- but have need to use FF 3.6 with a web application we are developing that requires me to use 3.6 for testing.

See this support thread: <br />
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2249039

Keep multiple versions of Lightroom on one machine?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for