Keeping Raw File Settings

To whom it may concern.
I have recently started using Premiere Pro and have found myself in a spot of bother. I have recorded a video in mp4 format which is in the 600mb file size area. After I have finished editing my video I cannot seem to find a correct export setting that keeps the raw files same picture quality and relative file size. Shouldnt there be a function that when you import a video you can keep the raw files exact settings? Any help in the matter will be greatly appreciated. Thanks

It really comes down to workflow.
Now, the mp4 format you are getting from your camera is NOT raw.  It is a highly compressed datastream that contains a lot of information.  Raw video footage tends to be extremely large and you need a very fast system to process them. These compressed files allow a wider variety of programs to access the footage.
Now, an important thing to realize is that editing video and playing video are very different processes, and video files that are easily played are not necessarily easily edited.  Premiere tries to take some of the workload off of your shoulders, but you still have to be mindful of the fact that these files you are getting from your camera are not necessarily easy for your computer to edit.
That being said, the destination of your footage is very important.  Are your movies going to be sent out as video packages for laymen to view on their computer?  Then you need a good easily translatable file that is compressed enough that the file sizes will allow for easy distribution and playback.  I recommend H.264 with one of our presets - They will cover most needs.
Are these movies going to be held onto for awhile on your computer to be used in another program or even brought back into Premiere for further use?  If that is the case, then you can try to match the settings of your original footage as much as possible - using H.264.  It's not going to match exactly, as the files are not being used for the same thing - storage on a camera vs editing in a NLE.
There are some good intermediate codecs available that are not part of Premiere but should work.  I've heard a lot of chatter on here for DNxHD and UT.  Both of those are free.

Similar Messages

  • Raw file settings missing from smart objects in tiff files after upgrade to CS6

    Yesterday I was using Photoshop CS5 and RAW 6.4 (?) in a Windows environment.
    When editing photographs, I  generally open the photo in Camera Raw, make development changes (ie exposure, contrast, etc) and then open the developed image as Smart Object in Photoshop.  I then clone, add layers, masks, etc. and then save the final image as a tiff.
    Yesterday, I upgraded to Photoshop CS6 and RAW 7.0.   Now, when I open my tiff files and Smart Objects in the RAW editor, my exposure, contrast, and black settings are missing (reset to zero).  My graduated filter settings are also missing.
    It seems to me that the embedded sidecar data in the tiff / Smart Object is not being read correctly.
    How can I update my old tiff / Smart Objects?  Re-developing thousands of photos is impractical.
    NOTE:  As a side note, I opened a RAW file with xmp data (not stored as a tiff/Smart Object) and had no problems.
    Many thanks.

    You need to set the ACR engine to the 2010 version in the prefs.
    Mylenium

  • Keeping RAW files

    I shoot in nothing but RAW. When I move my RAW file from the flash card to the hard disk I create a folder named RAW. I also create a DNG folder for the future conversion of my RAW files. I have been doing this for years. Originally because I started using DNG files shortly after Adobe created the format and I was not comfortable yet with its stability and viability. I now have duplicated folders using double the space. After many years of doing this, I have multiple terabytes of duplicated file space. I do all my editing in the DNG files.
    1. Does anybody else keep duplicated RAW and DNG files, and why
    2. Is there and advantage to keeping both RAW and DNG files.
    I look forward to your replies

    James Palik wrote:
    My original reason for converting to DNG is I did not like having to keep two files to preserve my edits, especially since I had an original problem with my XMP files getting corrupted.
    Technical background info:
    Once upon a time, Lightroom used a slightly different code for creating the xmp info which got written to DNG versus that which was written to a sidecar file:
    In the former case, many things were attributes of (xml) elements, in the latter case, those things were individual elements.
    In Lr5 (I think it was 5, maybe 4), Adobe optimized xmp handling to use more of the same code in each case (I "know" this based on the data and format becoming essentially equal in each case - it's the only likely conclusion..). For you ultra-curious types: xmp sidecars became more like the embedded xmp in the interest of more compact storage (and maybe other things I'm not aware of).
    There is a difference in how they're written to destination file, but in general writing to sidecar is slightly safer than embedding in source file. I suppose it's possible that the code for writing the xmp sidecars had a bug in it, but I have seen very few such complaints, if any, and have never experienced it myself. It's possible that the corrupt xmp sidecar you experienced actually saved you from having a corrupt source file (since hardware and/or code errors which occur when updating embedded xmp can render the source file unreadable, whereas proprietary raw files are never written to and therefore can not be corrupted when xmp is written).
    Bottom line: even though this may seem contrary to your personal experience, odds are you are slightly safer from corruption with xmp as sidecar to proprietary raw than embedded in DNG.
    Don't get me wrong: I am not anti-DNG (on the contrary, I am pro DNG, even though I don't normally convert my raw files to DNG, yet), and if you prefer not having sidecar files, whether due to practical reasons or superstition (er, I mean "esoteric reasons") - that's fine with me..
    As DdeGannes and others have noted, you don't have to use xmp at all to preserve edits (if you are diligent about backing up your catalog), but there is something to be said for having both suspenders and belt when you really want your pants to stay up..
    PS - have you considered keeping your proprietary raws in a different location than your DNGs (or otherwise exclude from your more frequent backup procedure), so they are not being repeatedly backed up?
    Bonus info: why don't I convert my raws to DNG?:
    * I don't like having 2 copies of the same raw file to store and manage (i.e. it avoids the "proliferation problem" you are currently facing..).
    * I want my raws to be readable in whatever software I choose, even if not written by Adobe.
    * I prefer my raws to stay virginal, and have my xmp in separate files (for a myriad of "more-or-less esoteric" reasons..).
    Cheers,
    Rob

  • Windows 8.1 installation Keep personal files option - does it delete files in drives other than c

    i am installing windows 8.1 . I am not getting an option to select custom installation. Does this delete files in my drives other than C?
    I want to install windows in c drive and want to keep the files in my D and E drives. What to do?

    Hi,
    No matter which method do you use, it would not affect your D and E drive if you don't format them during your installation.
    Which version of Windows was running on your computer now? "Upgrade" option is only available when a supported version of Windows is already running on the computer.
    Please refer to the following table to check if you could keep some file:
    Update to Windows 8.1: FAQ ("Will i be able to keep my files, settings, and apps?" section)
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-IN/windows-8/upgrade-to-windows-8
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

  • How do I reset a RAW file to it's original settings?

    Hello
    [I use PS CS3 (Although I have access to CS4) and an intel imac]
    I want to keep my RAW files unadulterated, in the state that they were shot, so that I can return to them at a later date to 'play' again, with a fresh point of view. However, when I open Bridge, i see they have the icon on them indicating that changes have been applied to them. I don't need the RAW files with the changes, I already have the jpgs and tiffs that i created from them.
    Yes, i searched the forms here and found how to prevent the settings from being applied to RAW files that I open from now on: tested the method and it's good.
    I also followed the remove xmp file advice and that worked, too.
    However, I still have a couple of RAW files that didn't have xmp files associated with them, and I can't get rid of the little icon, hence i assume the changes are still there.
    How can I recover the original unchanged RAW files for these?
    What I've tried: in Camera Raw i 'reset camera raw defaults', because I thought that would return all the sliders to the unchanged state, but as you can see, it still indicates changes. The camera is panasonic, and came with Silky Pix to work with the RAW files: last night I tried SP on the same photo (created the spd file). Would the spd file have anything to do with my problem?
    By the way, SP opened the raw file while it still had the CR changes applied and I think SP might have been working from the already-adjusted raw file. (Which is another reason why i want to keep the RAW files clean and original)
    Hope someone can help me (And that this isn't too confusing)
    Elizabeth

    Hi
    I just upgraded to Photoshop Elements 6 and installed Camera Raw. I’m taking RAW photos since some time so I hope this will improve my workflow.
    Like Elizbonn, I’m a bit lost about some features of Camera Raw and the files it manages.
    I understand what a RAW file is and I think I understand what a DNG file is.
    Is there a reference document more specific than the Help files?
    I found out by myself a couple of stuff but I’m not quite sure I guessed correctlt and I have some questions here. Maybe they are answered some place.
    1. The RAW file is never modified (by any soft that I know of actually). Right?
    2. DNG is a universal format that stores the same data as the original RAW with no loss. Right?
    2.1. Yet creating a DNG file is optional. I have a Canon camera so my RAWs are in CR2 format which is widely supported and since I’m just an amateur photographer I don’t need to go for DNGs. Right? Or I could just trash the CR2 files without losing anything. Right?
    3. The xmp file stores parameters about both the RAW file and the DNG (if I create one). It has to remain in the same folder at all times. I tried renaming: it works if it's applied to all the files. Some under-the-hood details are still unclear with Camera Raw:
    3.1. When a RAW image is opened, if I do no modification and I click the Open Image button, an xmp file is created. What for? If I trash it nothing happens.
    3.2. When a RAW image is opened, if I do some modifications and I click the Open Image button the modifications I did are stored in the xmp file. In the future, whenever I open that RAW file, Camera Raw will display the modified image provided the xmp is in the same folder. Right? The only way to revert to the original image is by moving the xmp file somewhere else. Right?
    3.3. The Undo function with Camera Raw goes only one step backward. Right?
    4. Camera Raw’s functions are in part similar to Photoshop Element’s and some are specific. Do they work the same?
    Thanks in advance for your input.
    Nick

  • Open the same raw file in PS5 with two different White Balance settings

    I'm trying to open the same Raw File in PS5 with two different White Balance settings.  One setting "as shot" the other in "daylight", then blend them.  The tutorial I'm watching says to "stack" the images.  The tutorial shows one White Balance setting as the "Background" layer and the other setting as "Layer 1".  I don't know how to do this and the tutorial is not specific.  Can anyone either point me to a step by step instruction or offer some assistance?

    Also look at the "Snapshots" feature of Camera Raw itself.  It allows you non-destructively to keep multiple sets of settings for a single raw file.
    Learning about it far exceeds the scope of what can be done in this particular forum.  I would recommend this book as essential reading:
    http://www.amazon.com/Real-World-Camera-Adobe-Photoshop/dp/0321713095/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&q id=1313502199&sr=8-1
    Additionally, there's a dedicated Adobe Camera Raw forum:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/cameraraw
    Wo Tai Lao Le
    我太老了

  • How can I REPLACE original RAW files with JPG's and keep my 'Develop mode' edits?

    An image describing my problem:
    http://i.imgur.com/hcqMYkv.jpg
    (Lightroom 5)
    'edits' = Edits made in develop mode.
    'CR2' = My RAW image file format.
    I have existing CR2's with edits for them saved in Lightroom.
    I want to replace the CR2's with JPG's, and do nothing else. I want those JPG's to inherit the CR2's edits, but I DO NOT want the edits to be permanently applied to the image.
    If I export the CR2's (which have edits) to JPG's, the edits will be permanently applied to them. I do not want this.
    If I export the CR2's to JPG's without the edits, I have no way of getting the edits back and will have to redo the work if I use that photo again.
    Any solutions? I've been trying for a while and have no idea how to do this.
    Q: Why not keep the CR2's?
    A: I am uploading these files to an online host (S3) as my primary storage method and uploading CR2's takes way too long with my internet speeds. Furthermore, online storage costs money.
    Q: Why not shoot with JPGs instead of shooting raw?
    A: I do my initial edits with the raw files and then archive them as JPG's to save storage space. They won't be raw anymore if I apply future edits, but I still have the option of retouching them from the 'original' state and still have my old edits preserved.

    Probably the best thing for you to do is simply use lossy DNG format (e.g. export as, or convert to..): raw data is re-formatted with jpeg compression (full-rez or reduced-rez), but all raw settings apply.
    If you insist on trying to have a true jpeg file with (mostly) raw settings, then:
    The simplest way I can think of to do it without a script or plugin:
    * Reset the raw photo (consider preserving things that don't translate well, like profile-based lens corrections and white balance).
    * Export jpeg
    * Un-reset the image (e.g. using edit history or pre-reset snapshot).
    * Sync settings from raw to jpeg (note: omit settings that don't transfer well, or that were not reset..).
    * Optionally: Delete raw
    To automate/streamline would require a script or plugin.

  • How to delete raw files while keeping original jpgs/later versions?

    I'm using Aperture currently, which apparently can't do this -- if Lightroom can, I'm switching.
    What I'd like to do is shoot everything in raw + jpg (using Nikon D200), and then keep the raw files only for the important shots.
    I really like having the option of raw processing, but the storage demands are obviously very big. If I could just make a selection of multiple photos, and have a command to delete all the raw files from the selected photos, while keeping the original jpgs, that would be great.
    Also, it would be great to be able to manipulate a raw file, and then when I'm satisfied with the image, to generate a full-size jpg & ditch the raw file. The jpg then becomes the master for that image.
    Basically, I want the raw file safety net for everyday images, without gobbling up gigabytes of disk space every time...
    Can Lightroom do this?

    I am unable to hide RAW files in Bridge.
    And I can't delete or rename them in Windows Explorer.
    I'm using XP SP3. 
    Rejected RAW files appear in Bridge as unlabeled files. They are not hidden. "Show Hidden Files" is not checked; "Show Reject Files" is NOT checked. I've got the Label settings on. I created a subfolder and moved a batch of rejected RAWs there. They still show up, but at least they're labeled "Rejected."
    Delete: I have a big sort to do, and I'd even be willing to delete these RAW files to avoid seeing them in Bridge.
    I tried deleting them in Bridge using several methods, but I get an error message that tells me I don't have the "sufficient permissions." This happens even when I try to delete just one file. 
    I also tried deleting them in Windows Explorer. There, I got an error message that theyare in use by another program. I cannot re-name them in Explorer either. I got the same error message even when I shut down my computer and opened ONLY Windows Explorer. In Properties > File Attributes, neither Hidden or Read-Only are checked.
    This is a big and important project, and I'm TOTALLY STUMPED! 

  • I am having some huge problems with my colorspace settings. Every time I upload my raw files from my Canon 5D mark II or 6D the pics are perfect in color. That includes the back of my camera, the pic viewer on my macbook pro, and previews. They even look

    I am having some huge problems with my colorspace settings. Every time I upload my raw files from my Canon 5D mark II or 6D the pics are perfect in color. That includes the back of my camera, the pic viewer on my macbook pro, and previews. They even look normal when I first open them in photoshop. I will edit, save, and then realize once i've sent it to myself to test the color is WAY off. This only happens in photoshop. I've read some forums and have tried different things, but it seems to be making it worse. PLEASE HELP! Even viewing the saved image on the mac's pic viewer is way off once i've edited in photoshop. I am having to adjust all my colors by emailing myself to test. Its just getting ridiculous.

    Check the color space in camera raw, the options are in the link at the bottom of the dialog box. Then when saving make sure you save it to the srgb color space when sending to others. Not all programs understand color space and or will default to srgb. That won't necessarily mean it will be accurate, but it will put it in the ballpark. Using save for web will use the srgb color space.

  • My Bridge keeps opening raw files in Photoshop?

    My Bridge keeps opening raw files in Photoshop CS5?

    That's what it is supposed to do.  Is CS5 the most recent version of Photoshop on your computer?

  • I have accidentally deleted a large number of develped images in Lightroom before I did a backup. I reimported the original raw files back into Lightroom hoping the develop settings would be re-established but no luck. Notice system mau have done an auto-

    Question?
    I have accidentally deleted a large number of develped images in Lightroom before I did a backup. I reimported the original raw files back into Lightroom hoping the develop settings would be re-established but no luck. Notice system mau have done an auto-backup as have an lrcat-journal file. Can I use this to restore my develop settings. I also have jpgs generated from all the deleted images.

    Hello,
    if you have a backup of your catalog you can do the following:
    1. Backup your catalog first
    2. Restore your backup catalog to some location
    3. Open your current catalog and select "files->import from another catalog".
    4. Select your backup catalog and your lost images. LR ask you if you want to overwrite the current settings or save them as a virtual copy.
    As an alternativ you can open your backup catalog, select the "lost" images and save the development settings as xmp sidecar fiels (using ctrl-s). Then open your current catalog, seletct the images and use "Metadata->Read Metadata from files".

  • How do i keep my RAW files from turing to jpeg files when exporting them to My Passport?

    I am an amature photographer and take all my pitures in RAW form (highest quality and more editing capability). I was given a My Passport for Mac external harddrive to transfer all my files to to open more space on my mac book. When importing my RAW files to the Passport they automatically turn to JPEG files. I just re-imported a few files from the Passport back into Aperature and they are still JPEG files Is there something i need to do to keep my RAW files RAW? If not with the Passport, is there another external that would be of better use to me?

    When you drag and drop the from Aperture you export the JPEG Preview.
    Use the command "File > Export" in Aperture  to export the original files.
    You can also open an Aperture library in Photos - this will create a Photos library.

  • Aperture 3.1.1 ignores color settings in Canon 7D .CR2 Raw files

    hi there!
    i have a problem with the import of pictures taken with my canon 7d.
    when i take pictures using color presets e.g. black/white, aperture ignores those completely during import. even if i open them in preview.app the settings are not applied. if i open the same picture in photoshop cs4 it will be displayed correctly in b/w.
    neither the updated of the raw processing (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3946) nor the 3.6 raw update solved this problem for me.
    how can i fix this?
    thanks,
    paul

    hmm, this behaviour of aperture is a bit odd.
    i understand the approach but if i shot a few thousand images on a journey, i don't remember afterwards, which image was supposed to be b/w. this leads to a situation where i +have to post-process+ images. i would expect aperture asking me if i want to keep attached color settings instead of ignoring them!
    and, yes, i'm sure that this image is a raw. photoshop interprets the color settings correctly.

  • Is there a way to develop the same raw file multiple times, each time keeping the final product?

    I've been working with my NEF raw files.  When I import one into LR I can start developing it right away, which I've done.  I also know that the modifications aren't made to the raw file but kept in an XMP file.  Since the I'm not actually changing the raw file do you know if there is a way to make a secondary edit of the file?
    Here's an example.  Let's say I have a raw file and I want to develop it in color.  Then when I'm all done I want to start over and develop it again and black and white but keep the color one as well.
    I know I can undo all the edits I've made but then I lose all that work too.
    Is there a way to develop an image twice and keep both final products?  I know copying the raw file and renaming it is one crude way but I have to believe there's a better, easier way.

    Yes, you can make a virtual copy at any time.
    If you want the virtual copy to be un-edited after you have done some editing to the "non-virtual copy", you could open the "non-virtual copy" in the Develop Module, click on Reset, create the virtual copy, then undo the Reset operation (click on the last real edit in the History Panel)

  • Keeping keywords and rating 'stars' a permanent part of RAW files

    I store RAW files on a portable HD.
    I use it for both desktop and laptop.
    Keywords and rating 'stars' entered on one machine do not appear when using the other.
    How can i make the keywords and rating 'stars' transferrable from one machine to another?

    I had a chance to talk to product managers from both Apple & Adobe about this at PhotoPlus Expo in NYC a couple years back. Both seemed receptive, but here we are - years later - no progress.
    I think part of the problem is that there's a purist mentality about RAW files. One should always shoot them - and then keep them forever- after all- they're your negatives!
    But what about event photography? Or weddings, as you pointed out? It makes no sense to burden your workflow & backup system with 4GB of RAW files of people grinning into the camera. Once the adjustments have been made, the RAW files are just a ball & chain on your data management. And let's not forget, once you really know what you're doing, your jpegs should be good most of the time anyway.
    I want RAW files as a safety net for errors in exposure and white balance. Once I know I have good photos, I don't need the safety net anymore- at least not at the price of all that hard disk space and transfer time for online backup. Of course, for my fine art stuff and important documentary work, I'll always keep the RAWs permanently. But not for routine parties/events.
    You put your finger on the problem with re-importing jpegs as a solution. You lose your metadata- rankings/album memberships, etc. This is no solution!
    What I want is simple, and it would be immediately useful to countless photographers:
    1) Let me batch-delete RAW files when the jpegs are ok.
    2) Let me do adjustments on my RAW file, render out a high-quality jpeg, and make the jpeg my new master.
    Whoever does this first - Aperture or Lightroom - that's the product I'll use.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Drag and drop file into Outlook from AIR application

    I am hoping to see if this would be possible with the Adobe AIR API. We currently have a desktop AIR application that clients install in order to facilitate certain operations triggered via a web application (such as opening files directly from the w

  • Isight firewire extension cable

    I need a 10 foot (or 3 meter) firewire cable that will fit the isight holder. Apple refers to this as a thin firewire and it must be able to snap in the transistion piece between the camera and the stand. Most aftermarket cables are too thick due to

  • Sync Log

    I've set my Itunes 10.1 to sync one my photo folder Into this folder there are 158 files .jpg When i click sync button, itunes work for 1 minute and does'nt show any errors but on my Iphone 4 there are'nt new pic files ! Itunes save a log file to und

  • Interactive Report Filter Operator Tool Tip

    version 4.0.2.00.07 Hello, I had question raised to add a Tool Tip to the Operators in the Filter on the Interactive Reports. When the Operator select list is displayed the Managers don't know what all the operators mean. I noticed that if the mouse

  • Can we use GPO for FireFox 3.6.8 on windows 7 systems

    Our GPO's control our firefox settings on windows xp systems but not windows 7 64 bit.