Key Combination at Biling Document Level

Can we create a new output table with the Key combination of "Sales org / Sales Doc Type / Destination Country"
at billing document level ?
How would the system get Sales document type information at billing level ?
Kindly Advice
Regards,
Manish

Hai Manish,
In billing document you cannot find the Sales document type.
Instead use
Billing type / Pricing procedure
Mostly different sales order types differs by pricing procedure
Regards,
Mani

Similar Messages

Restrict key combination using authorisation

Hello experts
Need a help.
I have a scenario, wherein I go to tcode MN04 or MN05, enter any output type for purchase order eg. NEU.
When I click on key combination button, I want the second radio button to work only and give me the output ie. Puchasing output determination Doc Type/puch org/vendor.
When I would try to use the first radio button ie. Puchasing output determination Purch org/vendor for EDI or the third radio button
Puchasing output determination: Document type, I should get an error.
Is it possible to restrict them using authorosation or any path in SPRO to restrict the radio buttons for key combination in MN04/ MN05.
Thanks
Amitava

V1 is for Sales, V2 fo shipping, V3 for Billing.....................
As i said earlier - what you ask for cannot be done for MN04 and MN05 and both transactions check for V_KONH_VKS authorization object and this object has only 2 fields Activity and Condition type
So with what we have we can restrict only on the condition type but not at the access key level
Could you let us know, why would you want to restrict a few access keys for particular condition type? What is the target to achieve ?

Problem in Inv O/P Condn Rec--"Debit/Credit Key Combination not appearing"

Hi,
I have done the following settings for Inventory Mgmt:Output determination:
Print control settings as follows:
1. Defined Print items for each output type (eg. A,B,C etc.)
2. Defined Version Print Indicator = 3 (Collective Slip) for MIGO transaction
3. Maintained Print Indicator for GI/Transfer Posting Documents - here I linked print item for my
     mov.types.
   I have maintained User Parameter NDR = "X"
Output determination settings as follows:
1.Defined my output types with access seq=0003
2.Linked output types to O/p det.procedure ME0001 (requirement field blank)
3.Maintained condition records for Trans.type WA
     Here, the key combination for debit/credit indicator is not appearing for selection
     - hence I am not able to maintain condition records at the debit/credit level for transactions like
       stock transfer but I am able to maintain conditions without Debit/Credit indicator.
     - as a result, during output determination, 2 messages appear for each document item.
   I want only one output message per document item.
    I tried changing access sequence for my output type to 0004 but once I did that, no output was
    getting determined for my material documents.
    How do I solve this.
    Is there any other config to be done (for eg. requirement in Inv.Mgmt procedure)?
    Is there any other user parameter I should check out?
    Thanks & Regards
    Prabhu
Edited by: Prabhu Sundararaman on Dec 16, 2008 12:31 PM

You call do_addition with a wrong set of parameters or you use the wrong datatypes from your parameters.
Check what parameters ( and their datatypes ) that procedure expects.
Also check if you have the right privileges for using UPDATE_ERROR_MSG and that a synonym exists for it.
fa_addition_pub.do_addition
(p_api_version => 1.0,
p_init_msg_list => fnd_api.g_false,
p_commit => fnd_api.g_false,
p_validation_level => fnd_api.g_valid_level_full,
x_return_status => l_return_status,
x_msg_count => l_mesg_count,
x_msg_data => l_mesg,
p_calling_fn => 'FA_ADDITION_API', ---modify by anand
px_trans_rec => l_trans_rec,
px_dist_trans_rec => l_dist_trans_rec,
px_asset_hdr_rec => l_asset_hdr_rec,
px_asset_desc_rec => l_asset_desc_rec,
px_asset_type_rec => l_asset_type_rec,
px_asset_cat_rec => l_asset_cat_rec,
px_asset_hierarchy_rec => l_asset_hierarchy_rec,
px_asset_fin_rec => l_asset_fin_rec,
px_asset_deprn_rec => l_asset_deprn_rec,
px_asset_dist_tbl => l_asset_dist_tbl,
px_inv_tbl => l_inv_tbl,
px_inv_rate_tbl => l_inv_rate_tbl
);

Delivery completion flag at delivery document level

Hello Tean
we have developed one inbound interface and Now the interface is working fine.. I am able to do the GR against inbound delivery and the PO status and delivery completion flag is also set at the PO level but now my FO is asking to me to set the delivery completion flag at inbound delivery document level and updation of history also. so i request you to please check and help me to find the solution.
Technical details which i have used for developing the interface
IDOC type: MBGMCR03
Message type: MBGMCR
Post Goods Movements with MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT (ie bapi_goods_mvt_create )
Please check and let me know the solution.
Regards
Raj

use T code SQVI. here you can join tables having atleast one key field among.
SQVI> give table name> press create> pop up will come> give the details > select table join from the drop down> click insert table> in pop up give table name > table details will appear> again press insert table> give next table name and so on. this way you can join many tablesd with key field. if key field is not there. it will not allow. after joing all the required tables press back button.
now from left side pane you can select the fields from ech table and decide which should come as input ( for eg company code , date etc) and the outputs from each table. Then save.
now you can execute this in the same screen. or else you can use it later on also. go to SQVI. give the Quickveiw name you have selected. and exceute. it will act a report with the inputs and outputs you have selected.
if you want to restructure the report . it is possible. change the input and output fields. and save

Key combination of Tax code / Vendor not working for JVRD condition Type.

Dear All.
I have maintain the pricing condition JVRD under key combination of Tax Code / Vendor . But the same is not reflecting in the Purchase Order. Have also checked the validity periods .
Kndly advice
AVS

Hi
Please check the following:
1. whether you have maintained the cond.type in tax procedure in tcode OBQ3.
2. whether you have maintained the cond.type in IMG activity: LogisticsGeneral>>Tax on goods mov.>>India>>Determination of excise duty>>Cond.based excise determination>> classification of condition type
3. Also, check whether any other condition record is maintained for the vendor at any other level in FV13.
Regards
Prabhu

TAXINN procedure - Key combination : Plant/Vendor/Service Activity?

Hi FI experts,
I wud like to have key combination for Tax conditions maintained at FV11, as per the following
Plant / Vendor / Service Activity number
Kindly revert whether the above is possible to configure or not. We are using Taxinn procedure. Itemwise/service levelwise the tax can be taken care thru FV11?
Currently i am using the following and facing issues because the activities linked to material group.
Plant / Vendor / Material Group
Please help
Thanx in advance
Srihari

With the help of SAP labs, the issue has been resolved by activating Taxes at services level in ESM.

Document Level

Guys, what does it mean when someone says that they worked with document level data?
Thanks,
RG

Hi,
It is related to S & D. Doc level data means very detailed data.... As probably dealing with ODS data (granular level). When Doc is included in a table as key the number of records increase tremendously.
Thanks.

Combining two sales documents into one billing document

Hi Friends,
I need to combine two sales document into one billing document. Header data is same in both sales document.
I have set factory calendar in the payer master.
Tried for data transfer rotine at copy control of item level. But was not sure which routine to be set.
Please let me know, what all settings are required to create one combine billing document.
Regards
Suman

Hi,
Is it delivery based billing or order based billing?
2 orders / 2 deliveries and 1 invoice.
For the above situation you need to write a routine which eliminates document number difference for Reference and Allocation.
If you do not have different customer purchase orders for these two sales orders and in your copy control from delivery to billing your assignment and reference numbers are blank then system will club these deliveries and create one sales order.
Else you need to eliminate these by writing a copy control routine and assign it at the header level.
Hope this helps. Pl. revert in case of further clarifications.
Thanks
Krishna.

Multiple document level javascripts

Hi everyone,
I've just created a document level javascript that assesses the viewer's version of acrobat. I also need to create another document level javascript that will open a popup menu when the document is opened, providing instructions on how to fill out the form. Since there will be two document level javascripts happening at the same time, ie. when the document opens, I wondered if someone could tell me if this is going to cause some conflict. I mean the second javascript that creates the instructions popup is going to happen for everyone when the document opens but the first viewer version javascript will only be triggered if the viewer's version is less than 7.5. So I wondered if someone opens the file and both javascripts are triggered, will this cause an error, or will both popup boxes appear on the screen at one time. I can't actually test this myself since my version of acrobat is current.
Appreciate any advice.

They will not lauch in parallel, but one after the other, probably based on their names.
My suggestion to you is to just combine the two into a single script, each in its own function, and then run them in the order you prefer.

Repricing of Custom Field used in Key combination for Pricing

Hi,
we have created a custom field and this field is being used in the Key combination for Pricing. For standard fields we all know that the pricing condition is repriced once the value of the key field is changed in the document automatically (not manual update)
The problem with this having the custom field in the Key combination is that when this fiel value is changed in the document the condition is not repriced automatically. We need to Do the price update manually for determining the new condition value.
Request you to help in solving the issue. Do explain the things to be carried out for automatic pricing for the Custom fields added.
Thank you in advancd.
Regard
Kula

Hi Kulasekar,
I think you have to implement Badi CRM_COND_COM_BADI, update communication structure with updated value from transaction should do reprice.
Hope this helps!!!

Tolerance Limit at PO document level

Is there a way I can do the tolerance limit at PO document level ? I can't do at company code level as we buy materials overseas too and we don't want to have any restriction on those .
Thanks

Are you talking about price tolerance or quantity tolerance? There are 3 kinds of tolerances that I can think of:
1) Price Variance from Material master price - IMG ->MM-> Purchasing->PO->Set tolerances for Price variance. This is done per Company code. Set message PE 207 to error in case you want to stop creation of POs based on this.
2) Invoice block based on PO price and Invoice price: IMG->MM->LIV->Invoice block
Set tolerance limits for tolerance key PP. This will block the invoice for payment. This is also set per company code.
3) Quantity tolerance: Can be set directly in the PO, in Material master (purchasing view using tolerances) and in Info records.
In PO higher priority is given to the info record data than MM data.
As far as I know there can be no tolerance per purchasing document or purchasing organization

MANSP Dunning block at document level display

Dear Xperts,
I dont see the field MANSP "Dunning block" at document level (for an invoice), transaction FB03. I have chequed the field status defined for the posting key, but I cant find this field. What can be the reason the I dont see this field at document level?
Best regards.
Cristóbal.

Hi,
Actually when the dunning run is executed, the documents gets the dunning block MANSP field and gets stored in table MHNK/ MHND. This block MANSP gets deleted from these tables when the dunning run is completed.
Sometimes the entry remained there, even after the dunning run completion and thus not considering customer for any next dunning run.
You can run the report RFMAHN21 in transaction SE38/ SA38 to check these blocked items.
Also check the below OSS notes if not applied in your system:-
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1005739
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1092805
Regards,
Gaurav

Is there a "fine" move key combination for precision placement?

As I'm trying to arrange objects in the document, when I press the up/down keys to move them precisely, they move at an arbitrary large step.
Now, if I press the shift key while I move them, that step is further increased (like the previous was too small...).
So, is there any other key combination that reduces that step and makes it finer for a more precise placement as in other applications?

I do not know. I am also missing this option.
Adobe Help:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/illustrator/cs/using/WS714a382cdf7d304e7e07d0100196cbc5f-6426a .html#WS714a382cdf7d304e7e07d0100196cbc5f-6421a
You can also use the grid lines:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/illustrator/cs/using/WS714a382cdf7d304e7e07d0100196cbc5f-631da .html#WS714a382cdf7d304e7e07d0100196cbc5f-631aa
Config grid:
cmd + K > Guides & Grids
and:
show grid: CMD + '
Snap to grid: shitf + cmd + '
P.S.
Besides Illustrator 17.1 seems to have a problem with a precise setting and attracting obiektwó to mesh.
I can not set the center prostąkata x: 0 y: 0 px. ?!

Steps to assign new key combination to existing output type

Hi,
Can anyone share details about how to create a new key combination for existing output type.
Regards,
Dharmesh

Dear Dharmesh,
Go to:
IMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Output Control - Output Determination - Output Determination Using the Condition Technique - Maintain Output Determination for Sales Activities - Maintain Condition Tables -
Maintain output condition table for sales activities
Click on 'Condition" from the Menu Bar. Then select "Create" from drop down menu.
Give a Table Number & press Enter.
Here select the required Feild from Feild Catalogue & Click on Generate.
Then goto:
IMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Output Control - Output Determination - Output Determination Using the Condition Technique - Maintain Output Determination for Sales Activities - Maintain Access Sequences
Here Click on the required Access Sequence & then click on "Accesses' on the right side. Here you can assign the newly created Condition Table at required level (10, 20, 30 etc)...
Sebsequently try maintaing condition record & you will see the new Key Combination appearing.
Hope this helps.. .
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Key combination to render frame content as pdf

I am not able to print my bank statement, which is presented on the Internet as a paginated document in a frame. The "print" link get me onyl the portion in the frame (less than a page). In Lion I was able to 2-finger tap the content and get the whole doc. Now the best I can get is the frame content that is showing. While trying various key combinations, I got a new window to appear with a pdf version of the entire document - I was able to print it. But I cannot discover what combination of keys I used. Can anyone tell me how to pop up a pdf verison of the doc so that I can print it the next time I need it? I have given up on trying to get any browser to just print it straight off. I am using Chrome, but I have also tried Safari and Firefox. I am on OS 10.9.2. Thanks.

Hi Prashant,
Do your forms change so frequently that you need real-time access to the FOR ???
One of the major issues I see with that kind of setup is ensuring that the calling web service gets the correct version of the form.
Say you have form 123 456 (2010-01) Documaker version 1, revision 10, that has been published and 123 456 (2012-06) Documaker version 2.1, not published, and a work-in-process. Unless you build a complete parallel forms management system, chances are you would often get the wrong version of a form.
Distributing a form in a "work-in-process" state is never good, but try to imagine the panic if, by mistake, a future version of a form, drastically reducing the coverage, is leaked.
You could probably build the search features on a set of folders containing the PDF version of approved, published forms. That's the kind of setup we have in place.

Key Combination at Biling Document Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for