Key figure fixing in aggregate level partially locking

Hi Guys,
When fix the cell in the planning book, getting "One or more cells could not be completely fixed" message.
1. If a material having only one CVC in the MPOS those quantity can be fixed correctly without any issues.
2. If a material having more than 1 CVC combination and try to fix one of the CVC combination quantity, it is fixing partially and getting the above message.
3. Even, it is not allowing to fix the quantity in aggregate level also.
We are in SCM 7.0.
Is there precondition that need to fix the material having only one CVC combination.
Even a material having multiple CVC combination why it is not allowing to fix one CVC combination in detail level.
Is aggregate level key figure fixing is not allowed ?
Please clarify.
Thanks
Saravanan V

Hi,
It is not mandatory to assign Standard KF to be able to fix. However your custom infoobject that you created must be of type APO KF and not BW KF.
That said, Let us try and address your first problem.
You can fix at an aggregate level. However there a few points to remember.
Let us consider a couple of scenarios.
1) In your selection id, it is showing a number of products. You are selecting all the products at one go and load the data and try to fix at this level. This is not possible.
2) In your selection id, you have selected a product division. For a single product division you are loading data and try to fix at this level. This is the true aggregate level and it should be possible at this level.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Mani Suresh

Similar Messages

Keyfigure fixing at aggregate level

HI,
I am using APO V4,
1. I am planning to fix my keyfigure only at aggregate level, My keyfigure is open at all levels like plant or material group or material, i can enter the data at any point manually. but when come to keyfigure fixing, i want to fix the keyfigure only at aggregate level, i mean if the keyfigure is at material level i need fix, any other level it should not allow me to fix.
I was thinking for a drill down macro, but my keyfigure should open at all levels irrespective of keyfigure fixing, is it manageable any how that keyfigure can only be fixed at material level?
2. this is a different issue from above, i have fixed the keyfigure for a month, after that i had run a copy macro to the fixed key figure, but the fixed values are overwritten once the copy job is completed, and when i check in the planning book, it is visible as fixed agian. do i need to have any macro specific setting for this during the copy macro?
Thanks in Advance
ARUN R Y

Hi Gurus,
I am having some problems with Key Figure Fix.
The business requirement:
Some fields must be kept fixed and locked during the interactive planning performed in tc /SAPAPO/SDP94.
What was done in order to do it:
We created macros using standard features in order to fix and block some cells in accordance with the business requirements. The first macro disaggregates the planning to the last level available for collaboration. Another macro using FIX_CALC and ROW_INPUT functionalities fixes and locks some cells (3 levels). After these activities the planning view is aggregated and it will be ready for collaboration.
These macros run automatically every time that the user open an specific planning view.
The problem:
After the aggregation when the disaggregated level is called again all cells have been showed fixed and locked. If we perform the fix and lock manually the system run correctly, i.e., only the cells fixed and locked are kept in this status after an aggregating and disaggregating processes.
Step-by-step
u2022 Set the macro in /SAPAPO/ADVM u2013 MacroBuilder. To use the macro FIX_CALC in aggregated level. The first attribute set with ROW ATRIBUTES, the second attribute set with VALUES. FIX_CALC (Cota de Vendas; Cota de Vendas). With this setting, the aggregated line will be fixed.
u2022 Set the macro in /SAPAPO/ADVM u2013 MacroBuilder. To use the macro FIX_CALC in level 1. The first attribute set with ROW ATRIBUTES, the second attribute set with VALUES. FIX_CALC (Cota de Vendas; Cota de Vendas). With this setting, the level 1 line will be fixed.
u2022 Set the macro in /SAPAPO/ADVM u2013 MacroBuilder. To use the macro ROW_INPUT in aggregated level. Cota de vendas = ROW_INPUT ( 0 ). With this setting, the aggregated line will be locked.
u2022 Set the macro in /SAPAPO/ADVM u2013 MacroBuilder. To use the macro ROW_INPUT in level 1. Cota de vendas = ROW_INPUT ( 0 ). With this setting, the level 1 line will be locked.
u2022 Now, go to in /SAPAPO/SDP94.
u2022 Disaggregated the planning view.
u2022 Run the FIX_CALC and ROW_INPUT macros.
u2022 Aggregated the planning view.
u2022 Disaggregated the planning view again. You can see the problem.
Thanks,

Fixing at aggregate level & unfixing at detailed level.

Hi,
Our requirement is as given below......
Our Demand Planning Process is Top-down process. Head Quarter will enter the demand at Territory, Channel and Product Group Level. These values are fixed and gets disaggregated to further planning level based on historical sales. The further planning levels are Sales Officer, Location & Product. Territory Manager can change the demand with in his targets across Sales officers (i.e. he should be able to change the targets of Sales officers without exceeding or reducing the Territory targets).
Can anyone suggest how to fix the keyfigures at Aggregate Level without fixing it at detailed level. We tried FIX_CALC macro, but could not resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance.
SP

You need to create AGGREGATES in your PLANNING OBJECT STRUCTURE, right click on POS and create the following aggregates
(1) ALL TERRITORY characteristics
Now you will be able to fix at the top level and still be able to change at the detailed level.
Read the following:* Let me know if you have any questions*
Aggregate
Definition
The aggregates in APO are not the same as those in the Business Information Warehouse (BW), but they have the same purpose: to speed up data access and therefore increase performance. SAP recommends that you use aggregates in Demand Planning.
These aggregates are sometimes referred to as persistent aggregates, in particular when talking about detail and aggregate levels in interactive planning.
Use
An APO aggregate contains a subset of the characteristics in the master planning object structure. The creation and use of aggregates is optional. The data is always saved on the lowest level of detail. If aggregates exist, the system saves the planning data on the defined aggregate levels as well as on the lowest level of detail. The data is saved twice, but consistently; that is, the sum of the details equals the aggregate value.
SAP recommends that the aggregates you build in APO for planning data also exist in BW for actual data.
If you want to save fixed values at aggregate level ; that is not at detail level of the master planning object structure, in a planning book, you must create aggregates for this level. Otherwise the data is only saved at detail level.
You cannot form aggregates for navigational attributes
See also:
Fixing Key Figure Values
Aggregates are discussed in detail in OSS note 503363. SAP recommends that you read this note thoroughly before configuring your master planning object structures and aggregate hierarchy.

Key figure value in a level

Hi is it possible to identify which key figures values has introduce a user ? and which CVC has the user uses for inserting the key figure value?
REgards.
PS :We have APO DP 5.0

Javier,
It is possible to identify and track the inputs of specific users contribution to that Key figure using the following method, Provided you follow certain prerequisites first.
Its should be known before the certain people are responsible for certain data selections, like if there is a change in certain Sales org, we should ideally know who is the assinged planner to that Sales Org. or that sales org has been assinged to which Planner
Next, Develop to Lag reports in BI using the regular snapshots of the the data extracted out of DP before and after the changes have been made for that particular KF.
Compare the changes using the versions of snapshot before changes and after changes, or perhaps create another calucalted KF showing the different between two versions. The BI team should be able to create reports that enable you to run this report on all levels for that Key figure.
Hari V

DP Local Key Figure Discrepancy between Aggregated level and lowest level

Dear,
Here is my issue.
Forecast (key figure)
Life Cycle Factor (key figure)
Final Forecast (Local Key figure)
Final forecast = Forecast * (1- LCF (%) )
Example :
Product 1 = 100
Product 2 = 200
Product 3 = 300
TOTAL FORECAST = 600
If I assign a life cyle factor to Product 1 = 60
Total LCF appears = 20 (60 + 0 + 0) => OK
Final Forecast Product 1 = 40        => OK
Final Forecast Product 2 = 200      => OK
Final Forecast Product 3 = 300      => OK
Total Final Forecast = 480 (600 * (1-20%)        => NOK
I have a very strange situation because at the product level, the formula is OK   => Final Forecast = Forecast * (1 - LCF(%) )
BUT Total Final Forecast should be the sum of the each product Final forecast = 40 + 200 +300 = 540.
Can you help me to understand what I have to correct for this aggregation ?
Thanks a lot for your help
PE

Hi Arnaud,
My macro is running "interactively" because it is placed into the Default basket of my planning book.
(macro executed for each save / change)
I agree, calculation is done at each level.
Here is the parameters of the macro... should I change something ?
Thanks for your help
Pierre

Error in key figure value at Reporting level

Hi Experts,
I had problem of Key figure value which displays wrong data in reporting.
The Process is :
I had added the key figure SALK3 to the generic data source (xxx). The Extractor is Table/View, Table is MBEW.I had replicated to BW side.
In BW, The process is Data Source(Generic) to 0MAT_PLANT(Infoobject (Added SALK3 to the infoobject of Attributes tab) ) loads to Multiprovider.I can see data in the multi provider for that particular field after loading.
Now the problem is, In Query designer i had added the key figure in Columns and ran the report.The output of the field is, If the value is 100 it displays 100 ERROR, if it 200 it displays 200 ERROR.Could you please help me on this,where i went wrong.
Regards,
Kishan.

Hello,
Please check with the follwing screen shots:
Right click on the key fgure you created----select edit
Once the screen opens select the NODIM from Data Functions before the key figure (as highlighted).
Finally click on OK.
Regards
NS

How to define calculated key figure for more summerized level ?

Hi,
I'm new with Query and client ask me Ito calculate % of WorkHrs / Plan Hrs.   I was able to calculate the % for all selected employees. There're no problem .
But when user drill on Time Code, they lost the % calculation because plan hrs is not presented at that detail level. User will see X at % calculation field as system can not perform the calculation.   PlanHrs is present at more summarized level only. User still want to see that % calculation possible at detail level.
I`ve tried different calculation, summarization but none of them work. It works only for one employee but using SUMRT () but It doesn't work if there`re multitple employees in the report.
My question is how can I do calculation at detail level if data existe only at more summarized level ?
Could someone help me to make this calculation possible ?
Many thanks.
Employee   TCode    Plan Hrs Work Hrs       %
00000121,    0009   , 1750,    0
00000121,    1PRS   ,      0,     67      ,   X
00000121,     2S02 ,      0,      8       ,   X
SubTotal for 0000121 1750, 75 , 4.29
00000122,    0009   , 1892
00000122,   1PRS   ,       0, 1333 ,   X
00000122,    2S03 ,       0,     107,    X
00000122,    2S04 ,      0,      232,    X
SubTotal for 0000122 1892, 1673 , 88.42

Here is my current report detail view.
[http://s49.photobucket.com/albums/f270/helenen/add/?action=view&current=2010-06-2511-44-20.png]
(click on link and view at 100%)
The 3 rd KF column is the calculated ratio which is => 2nd Column (Work Hrs) A% 1st column (PlanHrs)
Right now, I cann't get % at detail line (they're now shown as X, because PlanHrs is not null at detail line.
I'd like those X should be calculated as => WorkHrs (at that line) A% PlanHrs (of that specific employee) .
For example: 16 A% 1827 = 0.875%
It seems soo eassy but I coulnd't do it.

Report on hierarchy with different levels for key figures

Within 1 BEx query report, is there a way to report on a hierarchy where one key figure is at level 6 and another key figure at level 5? Level 6 being the lowest leaf node. That is the key figure at the level 5 wouldn't have data at level 6 aggregated or summed up to level 5. Doesn't seem possible because how would the data be modeled in the IC but has this ever been done?

This could be easily done at the query level. If you are using 7.x query designer drag the key fig you want at level 1 (top) first. Then drag the key figure you want at level 2 and drop on the level 1 key fig. Now drag and drop level 3 key fig on level 2 key fig. This way you can create a sort of hierarchy for key fig, but the lower level key figures would not be aggregated to the upper level key figures.
If you use 3.x query designer, you have to use level up and level down options after right clicking on the key figure. Place all your key fig (all levels) in the columns. now right click on the level 2 key fig and choose level down option. right click on the level 3 key figure and choose level down twice.

Disaggregation of Key figure not in proportion at monthly bucket

Dear Expert,
Please find the below case.
Here Key figure 2 is disaggregated based on Key figure 1 (Calculation Type P) also we maintained Time based disaggregation K.
The issue is - if you check total, it is 13 for both key figures as shown in below screen shot.
But region wise (Detail level) if you checked, it is not in 1:1 proportion and it is causing problem for us.
For example Region 2 having value in KF1 as 2 for Week 11.2015 but after disaggregation it got nothing on KF2.
(The reason is Key figure 2 is having value in week 12 and week 13 and nothing in Week 11)
We tried 2 different approach to get 1:1 proportion in Monthly bucket, but it could solve our problem.
Approach 1-After Key figure2 calculated in Weekly bucket, Reset Key figure 2 at total level in Monthly data View and enter the Total of Key figure 2 at Total level in Monthly bucket.Check the result at detailed level.
But in this case it is calculated for week 10, 11, 12 and 13 as 0, 9, 3, 1. (We want Key figure2 as per original calculation i.e it should be 12 and 1 in week 12 and 13 respectively)
Approach2 -
Approach 2 - Add another New Key figure as Key figure 1 Total- which sum the Key figure1 at detailed unit at Month level and then disaggregation of Key figure2 based on this new KF.
Its working for this scenario but different scenario is not working.
For example- here region 3 and 4 affected.
If disaggregation at Month level is corrected, our issue will be resolve.
Waiting for your feed back.
Thank you
Sachin

Hi,
In Planning Area u2013 Key Figure settings, did you try to use u2018N - No disaggregation in timeu2019 for KF2 key figure ?
This will mean that copying will occur in technical periods of the storage bucket profile and not the way it happens now.
Other option:
Now, you storage bucket profile and also the planning bucket proifile are in Days/Weeks/ .Months
Is it necessary for your user to view data in daily buckets ? Can the user view the data in weekly buckets only (and not in daily buckets) ?
Your planning bucket profile can be in Weeks/..Months .
This way your displayed data will be in weekly buckets.
Regards
Datta

Planning using the Non-Cumulative Key figures

HI,
In my reporting requirement for IP, I need to get some actual values from the cube 0IC_C03. The key figues which I required are 0VALSTCKVAL and 0TOTALSTCK, but these 2 are non-culative key figures. When I selected these 2 key figures in my aggregation level, it is throwing an error message as "InfoObject 0VALSTCKVAL(Version A) is not compounded and Aggregation level is inconsitent".
I read in some document that, it is not possible to use non-cumulative keyfigures in ALVL.
I searched in SDN and SERVICE also, but some documents are saying that, in new path level (19) it is possible. Now I using the path level 18 only. In this case how we have to use these non-cumulative keyfigues,, please sugguest me...
Thanks in advance...
Regards
Rajesh

Hi
Non-cummulative keyfigures are not supported fro planning and teh error thrown is correct.Please find the help link which gives what are supported and not supported as part of aggregation levels.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/43/1c3c7031b70701e10000000a422035/content.htm
Regards, Hyma

How to build Restricted Key figures in Universe?

Hi All,
I have been trying to find a way to build restricted key figures at BO universe level.
I have gone through the best practices documents and the mdx syntax documents.
Even though building Restricted key figures at universe level is not a recommended approach, we had a requirement to achieve it.
I have tried the below possilbe ways but could succeed only half way.
Please help me and others who has been trying to build the restricted key figures at universe level by guiding us.
Eg: A restricted key figure A1 is based on a basic key figure A, with a restriction on cost element C (detail object,cost element key)
I have built A1 with below syntax and could get correct result in web intelligence report
Select block of A1 measure object in designer
<Expression>@Select(Key figures\A)</Expression>
Where block of A1 measure object in designer
<FILTER KEY="[0COSTELMNT].[LEVEL01].[[20COSTELMNT]].[Value]"><CONDITION OPERATORCONDITION="Equal"><CONSTANT TECH_NAME="ABCD/1234567"/></CONDITION></FILTER>
But when I build another restricted key figure A2 out of basic key figure A with restriction on the same cost element key field but a different value like ="ABCD/678910".
Both A1 and A2 give correct results individually when they are dragged in a web intelligence query.
But when both of them are required to be dragged in the same query , no result comes because of the conflicting where clauses,as cost element key can't have both values at same time.
Then I tried building A1 in below ways, as mentioned in the mdx examples document
Trial 1:
Select block of A1 measure object in designer
<Expression>(@Select(Key figures\A),[0COSTELMNT].[LEVEL01].[[20COSTELMNT]].[Value].[ABCD/1234567])</Expression>
Trial 2:
Select block of A1 measure object in designer
<Expression>(@Select(Key figures\A),[0COSTELMNT].[ABCD/1234567])</Expression>
Trial 3:
Select block of A1 measure object in designer
<Expression>([Measures].[D787I2PW5YTGMTKL83RWBH80W],[0COSTELMNT].[ABCD/1234567])</Expression>
All the above expressions parse OK at universe level. Trial 1 gives a database error while running the query.
Trial 2 and Trial 3 nither throw any error nor return any result for A1.
If any one has tried and succeeded in implementing restricted key figures at universe level,please provide us some inputs.
Thank You.
Naresh

Hi,
this seems to be identical to this one:
Re: Condition Object for previous month data on current month input
I would suggest you close one of them as two entries asking the same is not a good idea
Ingo

Query regarding characteristics and key figures

Hi All,
Can anybody pls tell me in what scenarios a key figure can be used as a attribute of a characteristic?
what are the scenarios in which each type of DSO can be use?

Hi,
Can anybody pls tell me in what scenarios a key figure can be used as a attribute of a characteristic?
if your key figure in trasnctional data level it's give you the Fact.
If you use your key figure in your master data lvel it's give you the present truth.
Like this you have 0Material and Material price has the attribute of 0Material.
read below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/dd/f470375fbf307ee10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
what are the scenarios in which each type of DSO can be use?
We have 3 DSO in BI 7.
1. Standard DSO : it's contaions 3 tables (New,Active,Change log tables) : If you want overwrite funcationality go for this dso
2. Direct Update DSO : It's Contaion only Active Table : If you want write some data using with APD and BAPI go for this dso.
3. Write Optimized DSO : It's Contaion only Active Table : If you want load mass uploads and stageing purpose we use this dso.
Hope it helps you.
Regards,
Venkat.

Change Key Fig. on a aggregated level alowed ?

Hello Gurus,
is it possible to change Key Figures on a aggregated Level ?
THNX

Hi.
What do you exactly mean ?
You can add/remove KF from aggregation levels (KF should exist in infocube).
You cant change KF in aggr level (I mean you can't change length or other properties of IO via aggr level).
Regards.

Access on aggregated levels with virtual key figures

Hi all,
I need access to the aggregated view of a BEx report within user-exit RSR00002 for processing virtual key figures. Currently I only get access to the lowest non-aggregated level.
My requirements in detail:
I get certain key-figures (250 historical values)on the lowest aggregation level - so-called folders. Then I have to aggregate this vector of values at the next hierarchy level up to the top-level, say along-side a company's business department structure. Drill-down, slice&dice should be possible. So far so good - this is done easily with standard BEx features.
Then, on each aggregation level, i.e. hierarchy node, I need to get the third lowest of the 250 aggregated values to assign this to my vkf. This is not an issue of the algorithm but of the internal data representation or access to the OLAP processor because I don't get this vector on the same aggregated level such as I could see it in my BEx report but on the lowest non-aggregated folder level.
The question is now:
a. Is data access on aggregated levels and drill-downs because of the internal representation generally not possible within this user-exit and would I have to supply the aggragation logic myself or
b. do I have overlooked something critical - did I miss the trick?
Every idea or hint is deeply welcome!!
Thanks a lot,
Michael
Message was edited by: Michael Kronenberger

First check in Technical Information in RSRT , whether the
Virtual Char/Key Fig is Y or N.

Creation of new key figure at report level depending on the month range

Dear All,
I have a requirment where user wants to see the dollar values for the Amount key figure. Data is stored in the INR value in the cube.
Exchange rate values keep on changing depending upon the quarter. For all four quarters we have four different exchange rate.
Now system has to identify the applicable exchange rate and show a new column with the USD value just beside the INR values column.
How best we can achieve this.
Thanks & Rgds,
Anup

Hi
You can have currency translation at query level for achieving this.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/600157ec-44e5-2b10-abb0-dc9d06ba6c2f&overridelayout=true
Translation in Query
Regards
Ravi
Edited by: Ravi Naalla on Aug 17, 2009 11:56 AM

Key figure fixing in aggregate level partially locking

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for