Keyborad short cut Request

Question

-Virtual Copy
and
-Export Presets ( I know there is one for export, but this brings you into the whole export dialog box, it is then a second mouse movement to get to your presets. I want to reach the PRESETS with the short cut.)
Ability to customize shortcuts. I can do this in Corel Photo Paint. I love the ability to assign what ever function I want to an almost unlimited set of keyboard short cuts

Answer 1

Already read them thanks and LR is not that a big step forward on from PS, it's a step sideways as it just has complexity in different areas and is way too flawed at the moment with too many GUI/UI issues. Has promise though. Plus LR+PS are different tools for very different sorts of job. Fundamentally, PS is an image editor/creator and LR is a photo developer.
You still missed the point about the GUI and to use your iffy building analogy, no matter how well the flow of people is designed, if the signage is hard to read or locate as they are under mats, it's completely useless, as with airports and conference centres you really need to know specific destinations. Plus if it flows nicely but all the parts are an unnecessarily long way apart then that's no good either. That's a LR problem too, to edit a filename you have to move away from file you are working on, a terribly unintuitive and illogical workflow.
Besides it's a deeply flawed and pointless analogy as PS is an incredibly complex tool with a workflow that is multidirectional, unlike picking up your luggage. It is more like an airport, a bus station, a train station, an office, a home, a factory, a school... all in one package and where all the rooms in these buildings are possible destinations. Though when you know what you want from it, it's a doddle to use. Just like you easily know what to do when one is in a restaurant, a school, a bus station or at a library.
PS flows very nicely to my mind. It does what it does, exceptionally well hardly an appalling UI at all. Mind you v3 wasn't so nice to use and CS2 is essentially the same tool. Albeit with a vastly GUI/UI.
Maybe you want just a simple image developer, if so PS is the wrong tool for you, not that it is a wrong/bad tool per se.
It's very easy to do effective design for one very specific and simple task, say moving people from a plane to luggage collection, not really comparable to something incredibly complex, like software design. There's also no need to them to go back and undo their footsteps as they have decided they don't need that luggage any more as their client they were meeting downtown, has now decided to have a meeting in the Flight tower and they now also need to get/find safety kit to wear whilst running across the tarmac, with no signage as that is not how passengers normally behave.
LR as it stands has dramatically slowed down my workflow, due to it's clunkyness, slowness of operation, design bugs and it's different just to be different, keystrokes. LR may be cheap but I may well stick to buying the new CS3. And to revisit your iffy analogy, LR needs to be more consistent in it's Module's architecture to be like a well designed building. At the moment there's variation where there needn't be any. Why do I have to go to develop to review history, shouldn't that be in Library as well. It's almost like changing rooms to turn off the light of the one I was just in.
I would also prefer a Grid view option in Develop as that is easier than the current methods of developing multiple images. I just select all the images I want to develop and can add or remove as I go along. I prefer a big grid to the thumbnail option, preferably with a large preview on a second monitor of one image - like a combination or LR's Library, LR's Develop and ACR's window.
Constantly swapping modules for basic/simple functions is not exactly an improvement on LR's centralised paradigm. Worse if anything. Not always obvious which module you are in either and Cntrl+tab is the normal way to cycle through windows/files/nodules in a programme. But LR has clumsy [fixed] shortcuts instead.
You still haven't made any valid suggestions as how to improve on PS or even given a valid reason why adding customisation to shortcuts is a step back. Adding customising always benefits the end user, esp. as end users vary in their needs.