KI235 Error Message During F110 Payment Run.
Dear Gurus,
When we run transaction automatic payments F110, we get the message that our gain / loss in exchange rate account requires assignment to CO object. Error message "KI235".
I did search on google and all forums, but am unable to find an answer.
We are using New GL, and it's a requirement to split the foreign exchange to different cost centers. Because of this, we are not able to fix it to one cost center, but to let the system determine the cost center via OKB9 from the Profit center used.
OKB9 has been set up properly with respective Profit Centers mapped to Cost Centers. However, during payment run, whenever there are multiple profit centers involved, system aren't able to derive cost center. We have no issue when document has only on Profit Center.
Can anyone help me in this issue?
Thanks.
Regards
Foreign exchange gain loss account is a P&L account which will ask for a cost center/object if this acount is created as a cost element n your system. There are two options.
1. Don't create Forex gain/loss account account as a cost element. If you do this this account will never ask for a cost object.
2. If this account is already created as a cost element then you need to default the cost center for this GL Account in OKB9.
I hope this should work.
Similar Messages
-
System shut down during F110 payment run
During the F110 payment run, the PRD system shut down. There were 259 items in the proposal and according to the status 42 posting orders were generated and completed. What is the process to handle this problem? Can the payment run be re-started?
It appears that clearing documents were created for some open items before the system shut down but no checks are showing in the check register. Has this happened to anyone before and what steps should be taken to resolve this?Is it a matter of...
1. deleting the output of the payment run,
2. deleting the proposal
3. canceling the the payment check by check using FCH8 if any occurred
4. reseting and reversing the clearing documents created using FBRA before the system shut down
5. start a new payment run -
Error message during tax report running
Dear Expert
when i am running report S_alr_87012357: advance return for tax on sales /purchases
at that time message is coming (In table A003, the entry JMOP V5 IN is missing) message no ff100
what could be the reason for this error how to solve this problem please clarify .
regards
nitin shuklaHi,
It seems like condition record is missing. You can try transaction FV11 to create a condition record for condition type JMOP.
When you create condition record then insert country IN and Tax code V5
Regards,
Chintan Joshi. -
Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run
Hello all,
We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
Following are onservations
1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account
2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
Thanks & regardsDear Rajan,
the payment document validation works as follows:
If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
payment document has already been posted.
Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
open and are selected in the next payment run again.
If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
(if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
dear Prashant,
It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
available. If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
the payment documents update is delayed.
For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
that answers to it.
Furthermore please be aware that:
as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
problem with auditors.
So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
run without any problem.
I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
Mauri -
Hi All, I have few doubts in running F110 Transaction,
1) Is it Time Dependant? I mean to say I schedule Payment run today for 3 vendors and Next Payment run would be 2 days from now i.e on 01/21.
2)Can I have another Payment run for different Vedors Tomorrow 01/20 and Next Payment run date as 01/21 again? when I try to edit the Proposal it gives ccod xxxx/xxxx do not appear in Proposal xx/xx/xxxx Test-1:Correct
3) If a vendor is having 3 Line items one is Payable immediately, second is 14 day time and last one is payable in 30 days ,when I choose this Vendor in F110 today, will it take all three lne items payable?because I want to pay him all ,I tried this but system is taking only one Line item why?
Thank you ,
Paarthaa,Hi Mike Thank you for your Time to reply,I tried to take over 40 day time period as next Payment run date for one Particular Vendor with 3 Line Items having for him, out of Three, two are already over due and one is having 30 day Grace Period ,according to you as I gave 40 day time for next Payrun the system should Pick all 3 Line Items but it is not doing, it is Picking only one Line item with Least Amount,this time I dont see the error messgage during the Edit Proposal,
"How can I decide Next Payrun date with out Showing That Error Message during Edit Proposal"? if I am choosing 100 vendors at a time for APPrgram? One thing for sure that error messgae is dependant of Next Payment Run date,
Thank you ,
Paarthaa, -
I am having a problem with F110 Payment run. It's showing the error as: 'Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax'. I have done the payment run for the same vendor, same company code and it worked well. Later, I deleted one of the WH Tax type in Vendor Master. Has anyone come across this or similar issue?. What can I do to solve this?.
hi,
I am not able to see the Deleted WH Tax info. when I run the RFWT0010. I tried to do the payment run after executing RFWT0010, but am not able to resolve the problem. I have run the S_P00_07000134(the 1099 report) a few days back(before posting the new Invoices). Do you think this has anything to do with the existing problem. And I have checked the config. again for the tax type, Tax codes and their assignments to Co.Cd. which everything seems to be correct. I tried to pay using f-53 which is showing the same error.
As Hein said i tried to look in the Invoice doc. for the WHTax info.(I have the setting to do calculate the WHTax amount @ the Payment level). So, its not possible to delete the Tax code and make the settings in VM.
As per suresh, I have checked the validity of the tax code its(1/1/2000-12/31/9999). And the tax type, tax code are assigned in the VMR.
I am not able to resolve this. Has anyone come across the same/similar issue and resolved it?. -
After upgrading to 27, firefox will not start. Saw an error message during the upgrade process but cannot remember.
Tried to run firefox.exe -P but receive error message:
XML Parsing error: undefined entity
Location: chrome://mozapps/content/profile/profileSelection.xul
Line number 18, Column 1:
<dialog
^
Running on Windows XP SP3. No problem whatsoever before upgrading to 27. Sending this from Chrome as I cannot open Firefox at all.Thanks jschaer2000: after starting it once in safe mode, I closed Mozilla and tried several restarts in normal mode. So far, all worked:-)
Thank you very much again.
Still the automatic update process bothers me: it took me several days to discover the reason to the malfunction, since when I removed the problematic version from Add and Remove Programs, I didn't pay attention at first that it was another version, not v26 which I installed from my folder.
In addition, I like to save the installation files before I run new programs and if I didn't have v26 exe file, I couldn't have operated Mozilla at all. Not that it was fun to remove and install again each time v27 didn't react, but it was better than nothing, I still prefer Mozilla over its competition. -
Error Message During Vista Install W/ Bootcamp
I crashed my original vista installation, so I am trying to get it up and running again. After deleting the old partition and creating a new one with BCA in Leopard, I get this error message during vista installation
Windows cannot install required files. The file does not exist. Make sure all files required for installation are available, and then restart installation. Error Code: 0x80070005
I thought maybe it was My Vista DVD, so I borrowed a friends, and it did the same thing. This is on a Macbook PRO purchased a little over a month ago.
Please HELP! I need my vista installation up and running for work!"but when detecting hard drives, nothing shows up in the list."
I don't really understand that statement as without any drives showing up how were you able to even start the install?
At any rate, during your first installment, the one that succeded, do you remember which partition it was that you Formated with the windows installer? When you use Boot Camp to partition and install the windows os, BC sets the volume name to BOOTCAMP. As far as I know this is the one that you must use for your windows os. Before you can install windows though, you must use the windows installer to format it to NTFS <----- the format type depends on a at least a few conditions, the one that I can remember is partition size. I believe 32G and above it HAS to be NTFS. But my point is, if you try and use any other partition that might come up on your list besides the one that BC made for you, it will probably error out (if you even get anywhere at all with it). Do you know FOR SURE that you chose the correct partition to format? This is the only other possibility that I can come up with at the present time. -
Error occurred during CTM planning run
Hi folks,
Appreciate your co-operations!
I am facing the problem while running the CTM with the profile DEMO2.
CTM Planning Run gives one error and alert.
Error: Error occurred during CTM planning run
Technical Data
Message type__________ A (Cancel)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 401
Problem class_________ 1 (very important)
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ A
Alert: Internal error has occurred (<!> Segmentation fault)
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 571
Message variable 1____ <!> Segmentation fault
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ C
Log file display
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1363) 'SuperVisor' => Commandline : 4 respected parameters ...
Args:
m0001006
sapgw04
28812935
IDX=1
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(645) 'SuperVisor' * SAP APO CTM Engine [CTM/ctmsvr]
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(646) 'SuperVisor' * Copyright u00A9 SAP AG 1993-2009
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(647) 'SuperVisor' *
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(648) 'SuperVisor' * Version : 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(649) 'SuperVisor' * Platform : ntamd64/x64
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(650) 'SuperVisor' * Interface : 2.0
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(651) 'SuperVisor' * Build date : Nov 25 2009 22:59:47 [1259186387]
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(652) 'SuperVisor' * Build machine : PWDFM163
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(653) 'SuperVisor' * Latest change : 407661
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(654) 'SuperVisor' * NW release : 7100.0.3300.0
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(655) 'SuperVisor' * Perforce branch: 7.0_REL
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(656) 'SuperVisor' *
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(676) 'SuperVisor' * Hostname : m0001006
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(677) 'SuperVisor' * OS version : 5.2.3790 (WinServer2003, NTAMD64) SP2.0 (Service Pack 2), SERVER ENTERPRISE TERMINAL SINGLEUSERTS
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(678) 'SuperVisor' * PID : 6768
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(683) 'SuperVisor' * CWD : D:\usr\sap\SC6\DVEBMGS04\log
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(684) 'SuperVisor' *
<i> 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(453) 'SuperVisor' * free disk space: 190433 MB
<i> 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(454) 'SuperVisor' *
<i> 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * Memory information:
<i> 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * physical memory: 10238 MB total, 6511 MB available [63% free]
<i> 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * page file : 73212 MB total, 60889 MB available [83% free]
<i> 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * virtual memory : 8388607 MB total, 8388499 MB available [99% free]
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(693) 'SuperVisor' *
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(783) 'SuperVisor' * running in invoke mode
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(871) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> RfcPing(RFC_HANDLE=1) received in thread#6912
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(692) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_SET' for sending of parameters/options
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(703) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_GET' for receiving of parameters/options
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(712) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PROGRESS' for progress informations
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(721) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_MESSAGE' for messages
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(730) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_RESULT' for (intermediate) result informations
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(739) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_SYSINFO' for system informations
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(748) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PERFINFO' for performance informations
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1269) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> skipping empty profile value [GENERAL] sPROFILE_CUST_ID
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 7
number of received data: 10569
number of sent data : 1349
overall reading time : 9073
overall writing time : 162
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1110) 'SuperVisor' * Starting MainScript ...
<i> 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1445) 'SuperVisor'
***************************** OPTSVR - OPTIONS ***************************** *
[CTM_PROFILE]
nCTMENGINEPACKAGESIZE = 500
sCOMPONENT = SCM
sCTMLOGFILE = ctm.DEMO2.0000_0001.20091201043758.log
sCTMLOGFLAG = 0
sCTMPROFILE = DEMO2
sRELEASE = 700
[general]
bUNICODE = true
nSLOT_MAXIMUM = 1
nSLOT_MINIMUM = 1
nSLOT_RESERVED = 1
sAPO_RELEASE = 700
sAPPLICATION = CTM
sExeDir = d:\apoopt\ctm\bin
sExeName = ctmsvr.exe
sHOST = m0001006
sInvokeMode = invoke
sLANGU = E
sMANDT = 700
sPRODUCT_NAME = APO
sPRODUCT_PATCHLEVEL = 0001
sPRODUCT_RELEASE = 700
sPROFILE = DEMO2
sSESSION = tju5Bmz21}6WVG0Sn6pv3W
sSYSTEM = SC6
sUNAME = MBATCHA
[init]
sSECTION0001 = INIT
sSECTION0002 = GENERAL
sSECTION0003 = PASSPORT
sSECTION0004 = CTM_PROFILE
[PASSPORT]
bIS_REMOTE = false
nACTION_TYPE = 1
nSERVICE = 1
sACTION = /SAPAPO/CTMB
sPRE_SYSID = SC6
sSYSID = SC6
sTRANSID = 2205DEDE7A5BF16DA07D001CC46CF90E
sUSERID = MBATCHA
************************** OPTSVR OPTIONS - END **************************** *
<i> 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 802 to OutputInterface from []
<i> 04:37:59 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download
<i> 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 806 to OutputInterface from [MG]
<i> 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(166) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
<i> 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(167) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download
<i> 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1110) 'MsgMgr' renaming tracefile
<i> 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1111) 'MsgMgr' old name: optsvr_trace20091201_043759_1a70.log
<i> 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1112) 'MsgMgr' new name: ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
logfile reopened : Tue Dec 01 04:37:59 2009
logfile name : ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
<i> 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
<i> 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PRDAT_RFC_READ
<i> 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPAR_RFC_READ
<i> 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_LOC_RFC_READ
<i> 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PPM_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_TRANS_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_RES_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SSTCK_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_CAL_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPER_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_INCMD_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
<i> 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_DEM_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SUP_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_UCMAP_RFC_READ
<i> 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
<i> 04:38:04 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 810 to OutputInterface from [MG]
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(735) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download done
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(736) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
<i> 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download = success [ctx size : 1]
<i> 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Solve' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
<i> 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Match' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(102) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(103) 'SuperVisor' statistics:
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(104) 'SuperVisor' number of demands: 7
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(105) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(107) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(108) 'SuperVisor' parameters:
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(118) 'SuperVisor' time continuous planning
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(125) 'SuperVisor' backward scheduling
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(184) 'SuperVisor' CBCLP enabled
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(457) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
<i> 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(523) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(524) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1570) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1 done
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1571) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
<i> 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run = success [ctx size : 1]
<i> 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->upload
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1097) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
<i> 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1098) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::upload of packet 1
<e> 04:38:05 ctmsvr_script.cpp(229) 'SuperVisor' <!> STRING EXCEPTION : <!> Segmentation fault
<i> 04:38:05 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
<i> 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1166) 'MsgMgr' Current check values:
[CHECK_EQUAL]
[CHECK_UPPERBOUND]
nPEAK_MEMORY_NTAMD64 = 45344
[CHECK_LOWERBOUND]
<i> 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1209) 'MsgMgr' Performance values:
bSuccess false
nCPU_TIME 0
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
tracefile ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
<i> 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1235) 'MsgMgr' Performance Monitor values:
ENGINE_VERSION 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
nCPU_TIME 0
nHD_FREESPACE 190433
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
<i> 04:38:05 optsvr_dsr.cpp(96) 'MsgMgr' <writeDSRdata> tracing not active => no DSR written
<i> 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1256) 'SuperVisor'
Finished->FAILED ...
<i> 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(564) 'MsgMgr' transferring memory of heap 6912 to main heap
<i> 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(606) 'MsgMgr' finished transfer of heap 6912
<i> 04:38:05 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 116
number of received data: 420457
number of sent data : 39262
overall reading time : 5.30093e+006
overall writing time : 3831
<i> 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1332) 'MsgMgr'
OptimizeServer says GOOD BYE
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
KhadarHi Khadar,
1) The information you have provided is the CTM optimiser log.
Run the job in background and in sm37 and click on job log &
analyse the exact error happened. In case if you are not able
to do, please provide the error log.
2) Check the livecache is stable in its operations when the job
runs (check with basis team)
3) Run consistency check for master data before CTM run
4) Check for any struck queues and clear those and rerun
5) If you feel more inconsistencies in system, run livecache
consistency and rerun CTM run
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran. -
[Solved] 'New' error messages during init after updating initscripts
After updating to the latest initscripts, I got some error messages during init that I hadn't seen before. They occurred during one of the UDev steps, and were caused by an attempt to load an IDE module despite the controller being disabled. The controller shows up in Windows devmgr too, so I guess it's a failing of the mobo or BIOS.
In any case, I downgraded and found that the errors were nothing new. I'm just curious if the appearance of the errors during init was by design or a happy accident.
Last edited by alphaniner (2011-08-01 17:07:30)alphaniner wrote:
karol wrote:If you have the new (i.e. current) initscripts, you should be fine:
http://projects.archlinux.org/initscrip … 328fbaf2e7
http://projects.archlinux.org/initscrip … 42dfeca8c2
I had never noticed the file before yesterday, actually. And I'm up-to-date, yet it's still full of 'em.
You need to reboot.
After you do, run
tail /var/log/boot
Mine isn't perfect, but I've already sent an e-mail to the dev (it's a matter of just a sed oneliner)
[karol@black ~]$ tail /var/log/boot
Tue Aug 2 05:03:01 2011: :: Setting Hostname: black ^[[171G [BUSY] ^[[171G [DONE]
Tue Aug 2 05:03:01 2011: :: Setting Locale: pl_PL.UTF-8 ^[[171G [BUSY] ^[[171G [DONE]
Tue Aug 2 05:03:01 2011: :: Setting Consoles to UTF-8 mode ^[[171G [BUSY] ^[[171G [DONE]
Tue Aug 2 05:03:01 2011: :: Loading Keyboard Map: pl ^[[171G [BUSY] ^[[171G [DONE]
Tue Aug 2 05:03:02 2011: :: Loading Console Font: Lat2-Terminus16 ^[[171G [BUSY] ^[[171G [DONE]
Tue Aug 2 05:03:02 2011: :: Saving dmesg Log ^[[171G [BUSY] ^[[171G [DONE]
Tue Aug 2 05:03:02 2011: INIT: Entering runlevel: 3
Tue Aug 2 05:03:02 2011: :: Starting Syslog-NG ^[[171G [BUSY] ^[[171G [DONE]
Tue Aug 2 05:03:03 2011: :: Starting D-BUS system messagebus ^[[171G [BUSY] ^[[171G [DONE]
Tue Aug 2 05:03:04 2011: :: Starting acpid ^[[171G [BKGD] :: Starting gpm ^[[171G [BKGD^[[0;1 -
F110 - Payment Run -Advance to Vendors
Dear Experts,
I am Facing an Issue in Payment Run . The case is as below:
We have a Vendor whose debit balance exists because advance payments have been made to the said vendor . When I check the Vendor Line item using FBL1N for that particular vendor, I find 2 Debit Balances relating to advance paid and 2 credit balances relating to Invoices Received from Vendor. The debit balances are greater than credit balances and as such the net balance of vendor is debit.
While performing Automatic Payment Run, I would expect that the 2 invoices for the said vendor should not be picked up as the debit balances exists for the said vendor.
But the fact and the problem is that the invoices are getting picked up which accordingly is not ideal. And the strange thing is that other vendor in same company code and also in other co code with a similar situation is behaving as per my expectation. I checked all the master records and it seems to be okay. Only single Payment method is defined in the Master record and not in any of the line items of the documents.
Can you please help in identifying what could be the possible reason for this error ?
Thanks in advance
AJ
Edited by: A. Jajoo on Mar 11, 2010 11:54 AMHi,
Some times Debit balance documents are pciked due to payment method not available in the document and system not picking up from the master record. Second reason could be consolidation of Payment method supplement. It means, system expects the same field to be filled up in the debit balance documents as like as invoicesdocuments picked up during that run.Tthat is in the Invoice documents which is picked up during this payment run, Payment method supplement and payment method is entered, debitbalance records should also have same details.
Hence please check the same .Then system will consider during payment run
Regards
Uma -
F110 Payment run for multiple vendors
Hi
I will like to find out if I can select multiple vendors for my payment run in f110, so i dont keep entering the vendors each time i am trying to run payment. For instance I have payment method "Q" is it possible to create a variant that will automatically populate the vendors that use that payment method. also if it is possible to create an exception so that if there is a vendor in payment method "Q" that is not due for payment i can unselect them during my payment run.
I saw a similar question but the answers were not very clear to me.
ThanksHi Olany,
Instead entering individual vendors for payment give the range of vendors (E.g from 100000 to 999999) along with the payment method Q. This will select all invoices due for payments with payment method Q. If you require to exclude any inovice even if thos are due, this can be done via entering the invoice numbers in "Free selection" tab.
Regards
Nadini -
I have the partner profile setup for F110 Payment run.
I have added the message types : REMADV for the basic type PEXR2002.
I also have added : PAYEXT for PEXR2002.
The Payment run generates the Idoc successfully. PAYEXE IDoc is generated.
I want to actually generate REMADV Idoc as per my functional requirement.
Question:
1. Whats the difference if Both are pointing to same Basic Type - PEXR2002 ?
2. What should I do to generate REMADV and Not PAYEXT?
3. Any configuration that decides the idoc type?
FYI - The payment method configured for all this is "E" - BACS Payment.
Any help would be appretiated.
PranaliHi ,
check this blog http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a00afa41-4254-2d10-74a5-bd560edf74da?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
IDOC Configuration steps for EDI
IDOC Information
IDOC type: PEXR2002
Message type: REMADV
Function Module: IDOC_INPUT_REMADV_CTR
Process code: REMC
Process
When an inbound Payment advice is received, it will create a payment and clearing AR document with the document type set up in the config below.
Config
Define posting rule in SPRO->FI->Bank accounting ->Business Transactions ->Payment transactions ->manual bank statement->define posting keys and posting rules
Assign company code to EDI payments in SPRO->FI->AR and AP ->Bus Transactons->Incoming Payments->Electronic->Payment Advice Notes->Assign company codes for EDI payment advice notes.
Define Payment advice type 06 in SPRO->FI->AR and AP ->Bus Transactons->Incoming Payments->Electronic->Payment Advice Notes->Define Further processing with account type D.
Prabhudas -
Dear All,
When I run f110 - payment run, does it always create a "Payment Document" ?
Thanks in advance for your quick reply/.
Best Regards
Vijay.Hi,
i think no one of your business partner has payment method
<b>W</b> in master data or in FI-Document - only <i>T</i>
you can also take more than 1 payment method (here: <b>TW</b>)
in your parameters of F110
A.
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann -
Missing MSVCR71.dll Error Message During Launch
I just wanted to pass along an error message that I have found the solution to and have passed onto Adobe through the bug submission process.
I have discovered a QuickTime Component that causes Adobe Encore CS5 to give an error message during launch. The Error message states “The file MSVCR71.dll could not be found. Please reinstall Adobe Encore to resolve the problem” (Well, it is something really close to that. I did not write down the error message before fixing the problem). There is an “OK” button below the message to continue loading Adobe Encore.
The error message is only displayed if all other CS5 programs are closed. During my findings, I discovered that if you open Adobe Encore CS5 through Premiere Pro CS5 or After Effects CS5 by using Dynamic Link, the error message will not be displayed.
The QuickTime Component that causes the error message is “XiphQT”, which is used to play Xiph formats in any QuickTime based application. The Component can be located here: http://www.xiph.org/quicktime/
When installing the latest version of the program “Juicer” from digital juice, the QuickTime Component is installed. Juicer will run without the Component, but gives a message that it is missing. I have removed the Component since I use Encore to a much greater extent.
To remove the XiphQT Component from QuickTime, you must remove it manually because when QuickTime is uninstalled, the Component is left behind and will be a part of future installations of QuickTime.
While the error message displayed during the launch of Adobe Encore CS5 is not detrimental, it can be frustrating, so I hope this may help others that receive the error message from above. I should also note that I am using Windows 7 Home Premium.Greetings,
My solution was attributable to my firewall (Microsoft Defender) blocking TCP connections to QuckTime. Here's the steps that resolved my problems on CS5, Windows 7, 64 bit:
Control Panel
Windows Firewall
Advanced Settings
Outbound Rules
New Rule...
Program/Next
This program path: (use Windows Explorer to search)
c:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Bridge CS5\msvcr71.dll
Allow the connection
(Leave checks Domain, Private, Public)/Next
Name Description: (whatever you like - will display at top of Windows Firewall Advanced Security Outbound Rules)
Good luck, Michael
Maybe you are looking for
-
It is intended to implement SAP WM module at my company. For the cut-over activities, is it possible to create a warehouse on the existing storage location with material stock? i intend to adopt the following procedure - issue the existing stock of a
-
Upgrading from 9.2 to Panther
I have just inherited an IMac G4 800Mhz 15" flat panel from work. It currently has 9.2 installed and I would like to upgrade to Panther. I tried to upgrade but I get the error 'startup disk was unable to select the install cd as the startup disk (-2)
-
"Visual" Tables and Constraints are missing!!!
Hi all, i drew my database diagram and deployed to the database. But the creation file accuse a few tables that were created and deleted in the drawing process. I mean, they are not in the diagram, but JDeveloper is seeing them somehow. After deployi
-
Oracle 10.2.0.4 client/ODP connecting to 11g database
Hi Folks - Are there any know problems using an Oracle 10.2.0.4 client and the 10.2 ODP/ODAC client to connect to an 11g database? Normally ,we'd use the Oracle 11g client/ODP but it is giving us errors so we need to go back to 10g ..any foresee-able
-
How do I delete an application from my MacBook
I have transferred all the contents from my G4 iBook to a 2011 MacBook OSX 10.8.5 and few of the utilities are not working under the MacBook. Whenever I try to drag the program files to the trash bin, it says that the files are protected which they a