Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score
Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav
Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
Similar Messages
-
Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date
Hi,
I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
Thanks & Regards,
CharudattaHi,
Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks. -
Vendor evaluation - Quantity Score for Service Items
Hi experts,
Vendor Evaluation is active in our client system.
There are both material and service vendors for score evaluation.
One of the service vendors is having a Quantity Reliability (Delivery criteria) score of 100.
Only services (item cat SERVICE) is procured from this vendor.
The On-Time Delivery performance score is 0 (not calculated).
Why is Quantity Reliability set to 100 if all material documents are related to service items?
Anybody face such issue before?
Plz provide your inputs..thanks!Hi.
You need to configure Output type NAHN (Dunning). Define condition records. Follow the same steps as you configure PO output type NEU.
Make sure the 1st/2nd/3rd reminder days are maintained n PIR.
These days are displayed in Delivery Tab of the PO.
If the above output type is determined, then a standard SAP batch job automaticall ryns ME9F to send reminders /expeditors to the vendor. You dont have to do any other config for this
regards,
Shashidar -
Hello Gurus,
Can any one tell me about the vendor evaluation.
What is the transaction code for vendor evaluation?
Reg/ Shankar GHi shankar,
please go through this: step by step guide
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
Please check whether you concidered all these points in your configuration
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97dda414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97f3e414511d188fc0000e8322f96/content.htm
Regards,
Hareesha -
Questions regarding vendor evaluation
Hello,
We are currently trying to use the vendor evaluation functionnalities in MM.
Do you know if it is possible to get the evaluation details ?
For example, for quantity reliability, we would like to have a report giving the PO where the delivered quantity is different from the PO quantity.
Thanks,
Regards,
PYRCheck this Link
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm -
Delete score in vendor evaluation
Hi, everyone!
How can i delete vendor evaluation score for delivery?
After make evaluation, I delete a good reciept document (cancellation), so now I don't have movement document for this vendor.
If i make new vendor evaluation old score doesn"t change.
ThanksHi,
GO to Spro--->Material Management -> Purchasing-->Vendor evaluation ->define criterial>01 quality--> subcriteria ->03 Audit---> Scoring method -
>07 automatic determination from system audit.
but for that please create the inspection lot with 07 inspection type and do the UD .
with regards
Yashodhan -
Score system in vendor evaluation
Hi,
Please explain how scoring system works in vendor evaluation for criteria Delivery and sub criterias on time delivery and qty reliability.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
JanaPlease check these answered links:
Vendor Evaluation Score ..
Vendor Evaluation Score ...???
Vendor Evaluation-Delivery Score
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 21, 2010 1:58 PM -
Dear All,
Kindly give me the vendor evaluation formula.
I have configured the vendor evaluation with the following weighting factors:
Price : 30%
Quality: 50%
Delivery : 20%
i want to know how it is calculating internally in SAP .i want the formula for thes
Regards
Kumar.Hi,
please go through the following link. there is a document given by SAP.
COIN error during MB1A transaction code
this document explains all the formulae you are asking.
agian there are many threads which discuss about the various problems faced in this functionality and there you may find the explainations related to it with the formulaes.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar -
Vendor Evaluation on time delivery criteria based on Month
Dear Gurus,
I have requirement that , in vendor evaluation the score calculation based on sub criteria on time delivery should not be on date basis , but need on period basis.
Ex. I am giving PO to Vendor and delivery date criteria is on month basis means whole month he can provide me material based on his capacity. date is not fixed.
can system score on the basis of period or it will be always on date basis, please guide me.
Thanks & Regards
AkshayI don't think that you can have an individual scoring method for one vendor, so a change of customizing will affect all vendors.
A delivery date of an entire month would mean the last date of the month is the date in date field.
So you would need to setup your percentages so that 30 days early delivery are still get a 100 % -
Business Requires that for Vendor Evaluation, the scores to be at material level for the same vendor which means if they put the vendor number in the report parameter , the system will give them the vendor performance at material level .
Example :
Materials A and B were purchased 10 times from vendor 100001 so the system will give:
The on time delivery for Material A as 100 % ( if he did good performance )
The on time delivery for material B as 50% ( if he did bad performance ) ,they donu2019t want the system to give the on time delivery for both the material as 75% (100+50 )
The benefit of this is that SRS can find out another resources for the material with bad performance .
Any Thoughts on that?Hi Tafanzas,
The Vendor Evaluation system actually collects data on material level and then accumulates it for display in e.g. trs ME65. The data are collected in LIS and you can run the analyses from there using trs ME6H.
BR
Raf -
Vendor Evaluation - Price history
Hi
In vendor evaluation the score for the subcriteria Price History is not getting calculated.
The scoring method that I have used is : Automatic Determ. from Purch. Statistics: Price Behavior
What can be the reason? How it is calculated?
Regardsto determine how a vendor's price for a material has changed over the last few years, the material's price history is compared with the market price history.
The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained the current market price and last year's market price for the material.
If not, the system uses the price for the material group to which the material belongs.
If this price is not maintained either, the system uses the effective prices from the previous year and the current year. Prices from standard purchase orders for materials and prices from subcontract orders are dealt with separately.
The system then calculates the percentage variance between the old and new market prices.
The vendor's effective price is re-calculated with this percentage variance. The result represents the effective price the vendor should be asking if his price had changed over time in the same way as the market price.
This calculated effective price is then compared with the actual effective price, and a percentage variance is determined.
The system then awards the vendor the score you have maintained in Customizing for this percentage variance.
The system repeats this process for all the materials you procure from the vendor. Each time you start an evaluation, the system calculates the average score for all the materials. The result is the vendor's score for the subcriterion "Price History". -
Unsupplied vendors shouldnt consider during vendor evaluation
Dear Gurus,
At present during vendor evaluation system considering all vendors including un supplied for a period of time. the requirement is how , and where to exclude the unsupplied vendors, during the vendor evaluation , please share with full details im fresher in sap mm.Do you have an evidence that the vendor evaluation calculated scores for a vendor who had not any transaction?
-
Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria
Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regardshi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance Score
-99.9% 1
+99.9% 100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran -
Vendor Evaluation-- Points and Scores
Dear Gurus,
On what basis are the scores assigned for the percentage that is assigned. For Eg. what do you mean by the following:
Percentage Score
20.0- 10
10.0- 65
2.0- 100
2.0 100
10.0 50
what does 20.0- mean and how is a score of 10 assigned to the same.same is the case for all the entries.
Kindly explain me the entire process as to what does this percentage mean. Assume that we are evaluating the vendor based on Price.Hi,
The system calculates the scores for vendor evaluation as follows.
Calculating the Overall Score
The system derives the overall score from the scores for the various main criteria, taking the
weighting factors assigned by Purchasing in the system settings for each main criterion into
account.
The following example explains this process:
Example
The table below shows the scores for a vendor and their weighting factors:
Main criterion Score Weighting factor
Price 70 40
Quality 85 25
Delivery 50 10
General service/support 50 5
Converting Weighting Factors into Percentages
To make the weighting factors clearer to the user, the system converts them into percentages.
1. The system adds the factors together and equates the total with 100 %:
40 + 25 + 10 + 5 = 80 equals 100 %
2. To express the individual weighting factors as percentages of 100%, the system first divides
100% by the sum of the weighting factors:
100 / 80 = 1.25 %
3. Then the system multiplies the weighting factors the buyer assigned to the main criteria by
this figure:
40 x 1.25 = 50.00 %
25 x 1.25 = 31.25 %
10 x 1.25 = 12.50 %
5 x 1.25 = 6.25 %
4. The following are the results of percentage of overall score
Main criterion Score Percentage of overall score
Price 70 50.00 %
Quality 85 31.25 %
Delivery 50 12.50 %
General service/support 50 6.25 %
However, internally, the system uses the weighting factors to compute the overall score.
1. The scores for the main criteria are multiplied by their weighting factors.
70 x 40 = 2800 points
85 x 25 = 2125 points
50 x 10 = 500 points
50 x 5 = 250 points
2. Total points = 5675.
3. This total is divided by the sum of the weighting factors:
5675 / 80 = 70.94 points
The vendor is awarded an overall score of 71 points
Please go though this link for clear understanding.
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Regards,
Manik -
Vendor Evaluation through ME63
Hi all,
Kindly give me the configuration steps for Vendor Evaluation. The specific requirement is
only for two main criteria 1. Quantity - subcriteria GR/IR inspection & Rejection/Complaint
2. Delivery - subcriteria Ontime Delivery & Quantity Reliability.
During evaluation, the score of the vendor should be calculated as 50% of Quality Score + 50 % of Delivery score.
Warm Regards,
SadashivanHi,
Check below links...
Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
Edited by: Julfikar Ali on Apr 13, 2009 1:30 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
IPhone says "Restore Needed", but iTunes doesn't recognize it. Now what?
My iPhone was sitting untouched this evening. When I woke it up, it said "Restore Needed. iPhone cannot make or receive calls. Restore from iTunes." But when I plug it in to my computer, iTunes doesn't recognize it. I have reset the phone to no avail
-
Corrupt icons in System Preferences panel?
For some strange reason, the 'Startup Disk' icon in my system preferences panel has changed...it looks like a giant light switch and you can see a bit of a border around it. Is there any way to reset this back to normal? You can check out an image he
-
To check the License Expiry Date on EP??
Hello All, I have completed installing Permanent Licenses through VA in SAP EP.How to check the license expiry date in a stand alone server like EP??Moreover can u pls tell me what authentication is required for applying licenses throu
-
Statistical Pricing Condition - Purchase Order
Hello, We have a condition type in the Sales Order that is created as a Statistical Condition. However, in the PO this condition is being added in the net value. The item category for this item in the PO is 'Third-Party'. Is there a way to prevent th
-
Collect where itab structures are different...
Hi Experts, I have a problem where by i'm trying to collect identical lines from an internal table. What ive done in the past is to move the header line one by one and then collectther esults into a itab that has the same stucture as the contents bei