KJ280 Message Results Analysis KKA1

Hi All,
I am Trying to do a Results Aanalysis on one Serivce Order in KKA1 and it throws the following Error , I changed the status TECO, and changed the RA Key ,Just a try, but still gives the same Error Message, If anyone can Help me in this I really appreciate that.
Thanks,
Sandhya
Order without revenue: Only RA types F and Z permitted
Message no. KJ280
Diagnosis
The order type of the order on which you are attempting to perform results analysis does not allow revenue posting.
In the results analysis version, you specified that work in process for this order is calculated separately instead of through results analysis for the sales order item or WBS element. This means that the work in process will be calculated through the results analysis key in the order until the order has the status DLV (delivered) or TECO (technically completed). Once the order has one of these statuses, the actual costs for the order are included in results analysis for the higher-level sales order or WBS element.
Procedure
Enter a results analysis key in the order that is suitable for calculating work in process. To do this, choose a results analysis key for which a valuation method with results analysis type F (calculate work in process) or Z (cancel work in process) is defined.
If no results analysis key has been defined for WIP calculation, you must go into Customizing and change the valuation method of the results analysis key accordingly.

Hi,
Plz check u r RA version. In the version check under calculate WIP or RA for section. I think in u r version there is tick box on Internal and service orders w/o revenue. In conjunction with this check which is more appropriate between first and last option in this section.
If last option selected, it wont allow if you have any revenues on your order. Then check u r valuation method statuses and u r order status.
Regards
Sudhakar Reddy

Similar Messages

Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
When i am trying to execute KKA1 I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
Message no. KJ240"
Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
Regards,

Hi,
The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
regards
Waman

Results Analysis Message KJ436

While setting up Results Analysis for the POC method (03) and executing transaction KKA2, we got the following message. Both the CO version and the RA version are set to the same valuation (Group valuation). Any help would be appriciated.
Basic RA version must have valuation category "0" (operational valuation)
Message no. KJ436
Diagnosis
If a version has actual data (see basic version setting), it must be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of version of results analysis).
If a version does not have actual data (see basic version setting), it cannot be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of the version of results analysis).
Procedure
1. Check the basic version setting in the maintenance of the general versions.
2. Modify the results analysis version to conform to the basic version setting.
3. Turn the indicator Version relevant to settlement on or off, whichever is appropriate.We are using CO plan version 0 (see below) and it is set for actual and plan. The RA version (0) (also below) is marked as being relevant to settlement. These settings seems to address the error message but I guess we are missing something.

Hai Mikhail
As u mentioned u set the RA method for POC3 in OKG3.
Assuming maintained in OKG3 - the status control ,profit Basis,Valuation Level and its Minimum Values.
Is the RA version been maintained in OKG2 ?
In OKG2 - need to maintain the RA version with respect to the Controlling Area like 0 or 1.
Is OKG8 has been maintained on the Posting Rules - means where the RA version should have the corrsponding Profit & loss account number and Balance sheet account number.
Kindly check and verify according to the relevant RA used/picked using OKG1 in Config - OKG2(maintain RA versions), OKG3(valuation methods for RA), Define Line ID's , OKG5 ( Assignment of Cost elements for WIP and RA) , OKG4( update of WIP calculation and RA) , OKG8 ( Posting rules in WIP and RA) .
If all these maintained u will definetelu get the KKA2 result.
ENJOY SAP PS
Regards
PP

Result Analysis - Errror message

Hi
while we run the result analysis in KKAK we are getting
"Cost element 910108052 (line ID ZTS) already used for line ID CSA.
Need some help solving it.
Thank you,
Nivi

Hi,
Check T.code OKGA.If the cost element has been assigned twice to the line id and category combination pls change and check.
hope this solves your problem.
(pLS ASSIGN POINTS IF IT DOES)
Thanks,
Vamsi

Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

Hello,
I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
Example:
We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
Thanks in advance
Peter

Thanks Waman,
I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element. (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
I configure a G/L account with no cost element. KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element.
Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
Failed solution: I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number. The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement. I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined. The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution. I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order. The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
Question:
Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

It is more of a reporting issue really.
The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element. This is the business process the users currently have. Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly. This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement. Now that report no longer shows the settlement. How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

KKAX - error 'Manual WIP/results analysis is not allowed for order

We are running KKAX on some process orders. A few of them get the error 'there are values for cost element 999999 that are not assigned to any line ID'; however, we do have a line id set up for the cost element, etc; when we drill down further on the message, what we end up with is 'manual wip/results analysis is not allowed'. The business transaction for this is KABM. I can see on the order that KABM is not a permitted business transaction.
We only have this problem on a few of the orders. How is the KABM being invoked? Is it caused by an order status? How can I fix this?
Thank you

Hi Christian
i have come up with the new business requirement
I want to change some of the material in one of the plant into discreete.For that, I tried to delete the production version and then tried to uncheck repetitive manufacturing indictor in MRP4 view.
But it is giving the following error
Either you are attempting to delete production version 1000 or
you haveattempted to deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the production version.
It is not possible to delete the production version or to
deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the following reasons:
o Cutoff period for WIP calculation has not yet been
established. For the period in which a goods receipt was last entered with reference to this production version.
o The cutoff period for variance calculation has not been
defined for the full life of the production version.
Can you please help me out how to resolve this issue

Result Analysis Settlement - Posting to FI

Hi all
I am configuring Result analysis related configuration to post WIP values to FI on period basis. I did following nodes configuration
1. Create Result Analysis Keys
2. Define Result Analysis Versions
3. Define Valuation Methods for Result Analysis
4. Define LIne ID
5. Define Assignment for Result Analysis
6. Define update for Result Analsysis
7. Define posting rules for Settlement to Finanacial Accounting
We have RA connection with Projects
After making all above configurations when we are performing KKA2 and CJ88, NO FI documents are getting posted and we are repeatedly getting message as there is no "Accrual" values.
We even not getting WIP values at KKA2, though we have eligble values at Project.
we need to fix that at high priority...
your inputs are highly appreciated..
Kindly let me know, if any further clarifications required on this.
best regards,
S. Habib Pasha.

Hi ,
Based up on the above discussion did you executed any standard cost and revenue reports against the relevant WBS elements and verified that costs and revenue are flowing properly to the project ?
In the RA are you able to see the WIP Values,Planned values and Actual values for COST and REVENUE ?
And what are the parameters you maintained in Settelement Profile ?
Thanks,
Sai.

No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed

Hi Guys,
I keep on getting this error message beloe and the valuation is on RELEASE status
No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed
Message no. KJ210
Diagnosis
The valuation of the order or project in results analysis depends on the status of the object.
In this case, the object does not have an active status entered in the valuation methods in Customizing for WIP calculation and results analysis. Consequently, WIP calculation and results analysis cannot find a method with which the object can be processed.
Procedure
Decide whether the object should be processed in its current state (indicated by its active status in status management) by WIP calculation and results analysis.
If you want to process the object:
In Customizing for results analysis, choose Period-End Closing -> Results Analysis -> Define Valuation Methods for Results Analysis, add an entry for this status, and specify how objects with this status should be processed.
If you do not want to process the object:
This message is inconsequential for you. No follow-up actions are necessary.
In Customizing for results analysis, choose Period-End Closing -> Results Analysis -> Define Valuation Methods for Results Analysis and select the No valuation indicator. This message is then no longer issued by the system.
Example:
In the standard system, there is normally no entry in the valuation method for the status CRTD (Created). You will therefore receive this message for objects that only have the status CRTD.

Hi Guys,
I manage to run the RA. The problem why I could'nt get it right was because I did not run transaction MMPV to close period for material master
Thanks for your help.

Results analysis data is calculated through sales order

Hi All,
I m trying to calculate WIP of one process Order through KKAX. But I am getting the below error
Results analysis data is calculated through sales order 300002423 001000
Message no. KJ112
Diagnosis
The order you selected for WIP calculation or results analysis is assigned to a sales order. A results analysis key was entered for this sales order.
System Response
The system determines results analysis data for orders assigned to sales order items through the results analysis for the sales order.
Procedure
Carry out results analyis on sales order 300002423 001000.
This process Order is related to Sales Order and I have checked the Result Analysis key is attached to Sales Order.
Please help me out in this issue.
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek

Hi,
I was getting the above error because a RA key was selected ar Sales Order, Now what I have done is I have removed the RA Key from Sales Order, there is already a RA key attached to Process Order. Now When i am calculating KKAX (WIP) I am getting below message
The order is not a WIP element
Message no. KJ148
I have done this because my client is not using KKA3(RA fro Sales Order)
Please help!!!!!!!!!
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek Srivastava

Result Analysis Posting to FI incase of Projects.

Dear All,
       What settings & steps need to be done to carry out postings for the result analysis data to FI in case of Projects.
       Thanx in advance.
Regards,
Santosh
Message was edited by:
        Santosh Singh

Hi,
If there is no posting happening in FI then there could be some thing wrong in Cost element / G/L assignment as this will play major role in carrying cost / revenue from project to settlement receiver. Please cross-check your settlement configuration as this will carry calculated revenue / cost from project to FI. Please take the help of FI/CO consultant on this matter.
After calculating revenue / cost through RA, the same will be settled to a receiver such as PSG / G/L etc. There is only one steps after RA i.e. project settlement
If you want to post calculated revenue / cost into FI then calculated result after RA need to be settled to permanent cost object. However after RA, details can be obtained at project level.
In order do settlement, you have to configure settlement profile of the project with allocation structure / PA transfer structure / source structre (if required) etc.
The critical in settlement configuration is proper debit or and credit account should be defined properly to carry out calculated revenue / cost from project to permanent cost object.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Rakesh Pradhan

Results Analysis Categories

I am trying to understand how Results Analysis works on WBS. Is there any information on this. Some issues we have is
1.CLRV is not equal to VLRV for standard SAP. In our scenario we want to maintain constant margin by accruing cost as a planned percentage of actual revenue. Today CLRV is incorrect but VLRV is correct. Do I need to make both equal? If so how?
Or, can I gnore CLRV since COPA is getting the VLRV values.
2. COSR settlement of accrual/ deferral on another scenario using custom enhancement 1 is equal to total revenue and not accrued amount. Wouldnt this double FI postings? How do I avoid?
3. Is there good documentation on Result Analysis? If so where?
Message was edited by:
Ning Jiang
Message was edited by:
Ning Jiang

Hi,
If u are using same COA for both the company codes, why to use secound Controlling area.
Secondly why to Create, config and upload all the master datas,
U can reset the Comp code so the Master data will be deactivated
and u can post it.
Regards,
Padma

RE: Role of FI/CO consultant in Result Analysis

hi gurus
can u explain the Importance of result analysis and what is role of FI/CO consultant. What is process of result analysis. How is will be useful .

Hi Anand,
I have q question regarding service order process.
1.I have created a service contract and service order and costs are allocated on this order. Status of this order is - REL .I did result analysis for this order through KKA1 after that i did settlement by T-code KKO88. The costs on this order have been posted to FI debited to WIP account ( B/S ) and credited to P&L account.
2.Now iI have changed the status of this order to TECO.
can you please let me know how to proceed further regarding result analysis and settlement to credit the WIP account ( B/s ) and debit the P&L account because the order status is TECO
Regards
Ravi Kumar

Results Analysis for Sales Orders

Hi
When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
Msg Type: E
AppAr: KJ
MsgNo: 216
Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
Can any one tell me what might be the error..
Thanks in Advance..
Sivaram

Hi,
The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
- the delivery block of the order is set
- the billing block is set
- the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
- the position has been cancelled
- price condition is missing
In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
We often face this kind of issue
Good luck
Marian

Result analysis for Direct Postings

Hi All,
I have a new requirement for Result Analysis determination at service order level
Requirement is while posting cost to service order we have two costs, one is through Activity (KP26) and another is direct posting using KB11N.
Both have different cost elements
615000 is for activity pricing using KP26 which posted 120 $
195009 is for direct cost posting using KB11n which posted 150$
Now after the actual cost is posted to service order we are doing result Analysis using KKA1, I am getting 120+150 in WIP. But requirement is system should ignore cost of direct postings using KB11N from WIP and it should calculate 120 alone in WIP
I hope there is no settings using DIP profile to control this, i read some help and it says using OKG4 and OKG5 this can be controlling
I tried using OKG4 with Line id and assigning Category as N , but it is not ignoring
Could you please guide on how to ignore direct cost entries being determined to WIP. I have a vague idea on OKG4 and OKG5
thanks for your help
santosh

Hello,
While OKG4 can achieve however please bear in mind that since you are not going to settle this cost anywhere, cost will always seat of Service order. When you try and close service order you will get error that not all cost is settled, this will further impact your month end RA / Settlement job.
I know we can still close service order having cost but that requires setting on Settlement Profile and most of organization have SOX which does not allow them to close Cost object which has balance onto it.
I am side tracking bit but wanted to bring this up as down steam issue.
Thanks
Parth

KJ280 Message Results Analysis KKA1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for