KKA2 Simulation Issue...

Hi,
I am executing KKA2 for simulating the WBS postings. I have different exchange rates for 2 periods. 1st period 0.64599 & 2nd period 0.59630. When i execute the RA for 1st period the posting happens to respective accounts properly. When i execute the 2nd period, the difference of 1st period & 2nd period exchange rate is calculated for USD & posted to unbilled account.The same USD amount of unbilled is reversed int the 3rd period. This is a standard behavior. Is there a way to avoid posting to unbilled account?
Kind Regards,
Kalyan

Hello Gokulkrishnan Pillai,
Thank you for the guidance. The issue was passing the USD values to export_basis table in one of the user exists. This is now calculated & passed with right value. It has been resolved & we dont get unbilled anymore.
Kind Regards,
Kalyan

Similar Messages

  • Well Documented Live View Exposure Simulation Issue

    I'm including a number of links which document this issue across multiple canon cameras. After doing a search on the canon forum, I can't find this particular issue, so I thought I'd post and see if we can get an official solution. (New to the Canon forums, so if I'm not looking in the right place, please let me know.)
    In my opinion, the vimeo link illustrates this best. (and while the 2nd link says "solved" ... perhaps the solution could be described as "janky" at best.)
    Basically, from what I can gather: The Live View (*in photo mode) uses the lens's aperture data to update the exposure simulation parameters. This effects the way the LCD and the Histogram interpret exposure settings. If you are using a lens without these digital chips, the Exp. Sim. parameters don't get updated and the liveview/histogram will sometimes appear under exposed when compared to the actual photograph (anywhere from -1 to -4 stops from what I've seen).
    What's strange is that this problem disapears in video mode. Perhaps I don't understand the real issue, but it sounds like a firmware update is needed. Is there an update available(or will there be) that fixes this problem?
    https://vimeo.com/43633270
    http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?246032-dark-live-view-on-T2i-550D-when-using-vintage-manual...
    http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/archive/index.php/t-247001.html

    If I understand you correctly... you're referring to a 3rd party lens designed to fit on a Canon EOS body as an "EF" lens -- not actually suggesting that Canon themselves make a lens that has the problem.  
    Niether Canon nor Nikon (nor anybody else that I am aware of) release the specs to 3rd party lens makers.  Those 3rd parties reverse-engineer the cameras in an attempt to build compatible lenses.  Again, I'd stress that to my knowledge, ALL camera makers are the same in this respect.  It is not a differentiator.  
    Rokinon (and the same lenses are sold under a variety of names) is known for their very cheap lenses.  It's a bit of a case of "you get what you paid for."  
    I don't work for Canon so I'm not trying to argue that you should only consider Canon products.  (I do like their products and am happy with all of my Canon gear.)  But I would probably not reduce my camera buying decisions be decided by just this one feature alone.  There are are so many aspects to consider when buying a camera.  Is this really that important to you?  
    The guy in this video is using a Canon 5D III.  That's a $3500 camera body.  Realistically, no photographer who can afford a $3500 camera body is going to shoot with a Rokinon 14mm lens -- and then have the audacity to expect that it's Canon's fault when the cheap lens isn't fully compatible with the high end $3500 body.   :-/
    There are a number of 3rd party lens makers... Sigma, Tokina, Tamron... and then there are some very high end lens makers... Schneider, Ziess, etc.   But when these lens makers build lenses for the cameras, they actually do tend to work correctly (not always... and sometimes a lens that worked with one body might not continue to work years later when Canon comes out with newer bodies... but Canon's own lenses DO work EVEN when you upgrade camera bodies.  Canon makes certain of that.)
    Rokinon, however (and the same lenses are sold under multiple names... Samyang, Bower, Pro-Optic, etc.) are known for their especially cheap, basic, low-end lenses.  If you are going to buy an exceptionally cheap, basic, low-end lens... you should probably not be at all surprised to learn that there are limitations.   Notice, for example, that the lens has an aperture ring on the lens... modern lenses don't do that anymore.  
    Tim Campbell
    5D II, 5D III, 60Da

  • Guided Software Simulation issue - Captivate 7

    Hi all,
    I'm new to Captivate 7 but am an experienced Lectora user. I purchased Captivate mainly to make use of the Software Simulation functions.
    It's proving very difficult to find any tutorials or resouces online to help solve this particular problem:
    1) I want to create a Software Simulation demo of a program being used (I have done this step no problem).
    2) I want the user to then do the same steps for themselves  - I have also achieved this in 'Training mode' with correct & incorrect captions
    3) On failure of 3 or 4 attempts of clicking an incorrect function, I want the user to be sent to the demo again, then back to try it for themselves until it's correct.
    The question is; How do I achieve step 3?
    If anyone can provide a step-by-step answer that would be great.
    Many thanks.

    The solution to your issue requires use of Variables and Advanced Actions.  These are very powerful features in Adobe Captivate, but they take some time to learn, and there are an almost unlimited number of ways to use them.
    You don't clarify in your description whether or not the user fails three or four individual clicks on objects, or whether they fail the entire training simulation three or four times.  Which is it?
    I would recommend you start studying up on this aspect of Captivate.  There are quite a few websites you can find by Googling for info about Adobe Captivate Advanced Actions.
    This e-book gives you a complete introduction to the subject, starting simple and moving to progressively more advanced techniques:
    http://www.infosemantics.com.au/adobe-captivate-advanced-actions
    (It also comes with practice project files for Cp5, 6, and 7.)

  • Software simulation issue - help!

    When extending the screen of my laptop by using an additional monitor and using the software simulation tool on Captivate 7, I have re-sized and aligned the red record border to the correct size (1280 x 720) and recorded the action. When the slides appear in Captivate, the red border can be seen, the recorded area has moved and the mouse position is now wrong.
    I need the extended monitor because the laptop has the wrong resolution for what I am recording. Is there a way to resolve this?

    Hi @Onanisland 
    Welcome to the HP Forums!
    It is a great  place to find answers and tips!
    For you to have the best experience in the HP forum I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide Learn How to Post and More
    I understand that after doing some updates your Instant Text is no longer functioning fully.
    If you click on the shield or logo or perhaps right click do you get any additional details?
    Have you tried using MS Fix It   to try and overcome this difficulty?
    Have you tried contacting the manufacturer of the software for possible solutions ?  Textware Solutions Forums
    There are also contact links on the bottom of the Textware solution forums.
    You could also do a restore back to before the updates were installed.   HP Notebook PCs - Using Microsoft System Restore
    You could also try uninstalling the  software and reinstalling.
    Best of Luck!
    Sparkles1
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • Invoice simulation issue

    Dear Gurus,
    PO has has raised for 4 items each with Qty 500
    item1 500 qty   value 4990 Eur
    item2 500 qty    value 4990 Eur
    item3 500 qty    value  460 Eur
    item4 500 qty     value 460 Eur
    GR happened for
    item1 491 qty   value 4900.18 Eur
    item2 500 qty    value 4990 Eur
    item3 500 qty    value  460 Eur
    item4 500 qty     value 460 Eur
    at the same time i mean same material document
    now when i am doing IR
    its showing 4 items
    item1 491 qty   value 4900.18 Eur
    item2 500 qty    value 4990 Eur
    item3 500 qty    value  460 Eur
    item4 500 qty     value 460 Eur
    but when i am simulating its showing 1st item , and showing debit of 5910 which is a total of Item2,3,4
    its not showing vendor G/L account number its showing only GR/IR clearing G/L account number.
    than i did i have selected only item 2,3 and 4 and simulated its showing vendor G/L number and GR/IR clearing account also.
    Please help how can i Proceed to slove this issue
    Regards
    venu

    No kishore, i am posting correctly,
    selecting 4 item while doing IR and similating ,if i select 4 items its not showling the items2,3,4 at the same time vendor G/L account also not reflecting.if i select items 2,3,4 its coming Properly.
    Please advice me
    Regards
    venu

  • Assessment Simulation Issue

    I created an assessment simulation.  In my project preview,  if I can click the forward button it will allow me to advance to the next slide without performing the necessary actions.  How can I stop this?
    Note:  My failure captions display and the slide won't auto advance.  Only issue is clicking the forward button.

    Hello and welcome,
    Totally agree with Sreekanth, I will never show the playbar when it is an assessment simulation.
    But he forgot your second question: 'slide will not auto advance'. Are you talking about an inserted click box, that has to be clicked? Or is it a Text Entry Box in which the user has to type something? For both examples, check the settings in the Properties panel: how many attempts are provided, what are the Actions On Success, and After Last Attempt? Those actions will be executed when the trainee has clicked on the click box or has entered the required text.
    Lilybiri

  • RG1 Simulation issue

    Dear All,
    While updating RG1 register, I selected the line items to update and click on "Simulate" button, traffice light turned to "Red".
    Actually, mine is a Stock Transport Order. I have created a delivery based on a P.O and a Proforma invoice based on the delivery.
    After that, I am receiving the material in the receiving plant based on "Outgoing delivery".
    I checked everything, everything is fine. What may be the issue here.
    Regards,
    Mullairaja

    hi
    The process
    Receiving plant raises the PO ME21N
    Supplying plant creates the delivery in VL10B
    VL02n do the PGI asn save the delivery.
    With reference to delivery create the proforma invoice JEX in VF01.
    sUPPLYING PLANT CREATES THE EXCISE INVOICE WITH REFERENCE TO PROFORMA INVOICE IN j1IIN.
    In supplying plant we have to update the rg1 register
    Receivng plant captures the goods receipt in MIGO and also excise invoice
    regards
    SAP SD
    Edited by: sapkpit_sd on Jul 20, 2010 9:25 AM

  • IP19- Graphic Scheduling Overview and Simulation# Issue.

    Dear All,
    Good Day,
    I have  run transaction IP19 for a perticular Maintenance plan and I did "Release Call"
    by clicking relevent icon. Its changend in Green Color ("CALLED ICON") also I saved
    the same.
    When i checked related  Maintenance plan, it dosen't have released  scheduled.
    But when i do through IP10 its getting released by cliking Green Flag.
    Please suggest me what could be the reason for the IP19 Issue.
    Best Regards,
    KSK

    HI Suresh
    TCODE IP19
    Enter your Equipment in the input field.
    Execute
    Then, Select your plan from the Equipment. It will display the Scheduled Call objects
    Select it and click Release Icon
    You will get the order no.
    Go to ip10...
    select the scheduled object, it will be displayed "called"
    Select the called object and click display (to display the order)
    You cannot release the order twice
    - pithan

  • Software Simulation Issue

    Got a weird one on a  colleague's system. When she records a software simulation or a video demo, the file saves as a single slide. The settings are as seen below for recording:
    All other settings are at the default parameters. Any ideas as to why she's getting a single slide output?

    Hey, Lieve!   I know it was a software simulation - we set it up, opened up the recording window, rechecked the settings, recorded - and came up with this. I use the video demo settings quite a bit - the timeline on this only shows a default 3 second slide, not a full video recording.

  • BI Content Install Simulation Issue

    Hi, I'm installing the technical content in BI 7.x SP15.    When I simulate I get all kinds of errors in the infocube section saying InfoObject xxxx  is not available in active version.   But when I check the list of collected objects the infoobjects are in list to be installed.  I tried the simulation in both list mode and hierarchy mode.   think I should just ignore these messages?
    Update:
    It's only the Message window below that has the errors.  The Collected Objects Window shows with a green checkmark that the simulation result is successful....
    Thanks!

    go through this links:
    I think these links helpful to u
    Problem in Installing BI Content
    Error when Installing Business Content BW 3.5
    Regards,
    Lakshmi

  • DC stabilized amplifier simulation issue

    Hi
    I'm trying to use Multisim 11 to simulate the circuit shown on page 10 of Linear Technology Application Note 21
    When I do this the output of the LT1028 is pegged to the +ve supply rail.
    Also the voltages on the supply pins of the LT1052 are nearly at the +/-15V supply rails rather than being +/- 5V (I can understand this one I think).
    I'm guessing that the model for the LT1028 doesn't allow for the offset pins?
    I attach the file...
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    DC Stabilised Amplifier.ms11 ‏113 KB

    Blush - idiot mistake please ignore previous.

  • Travel Expenses Simulation Issue

    I have created Trvale Expenses thru PR05 succesfully and the results are showing correctly as per the config except  the following.....
    Additional Amount is displaying wth the partial amount..... i am not where this amount is coming from.....
    Would you please help us in this regard.....
    Thanks
    Neeken

    Hi Thanx for your immediate reply... here's the attahement for ref....
    https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=10S1XOJcXvQ1BpItX76ufoQrCDR4lDFfkfGG8Nc7BTUU
    Regards
    Neeken

  • Simulation Issue

    I am using Satin Red Cover and Satin Red Index.
    The index show the Chapters exactly as I set them in Final Cut Pro. When I Simulate and enter for the Index, it works. When I select Main or Next, it works.
    But when I select a specific Chapter in the Index, nothing happens. This has never happened before. What could be causing this problem? There's no Target choice for Chapters, as far as I know.

    Take a look at the connection tabs for the menu and see where the button connections are set. You can target Chapters in a track from a button and/or target stories etc.
    1.) Highlight the menu
    2.) Click on the connections tab (slightly to the lower left of the burn icon [here|http://dvdstepbystep.com/layofland.php]

  • DTP Short dump issue

    Hi Expert,
    I face a DTP shortdump issue on loading data from PSA to DSO
    The DSO is write optimize.
    DTP is using symantic loading and support 3 processor, pack size is default
    Situation is as below:
    1. This issue occurs every two days. In some situation, it will occur everday
    2. The DTP will face short dump. Then when we rerun the DTP, everything goes will
    3. Not all the system face this issue (for example, we have dev/qas/prd, this issue cannot be reproduced in qas)
    Below is the shortdump point in ST22
       when '3'.
          select single * from rsmonicdp into l_s_monicdp where
                 rnr   = l_rnr and
                 icube = p_ods and
                 dp_nr = i_datapakid.
          if sy-subrc <> 0.
            data: l_s_iccont type rsiccont.
            data: l_s_reqdone    type rsreqdone.
            select single * from rsreqdone into l_s_reqdone where
                   rnr = l_rnr.
            if sy-subrc <> 0.
              message x000.
            endif.
            l_s_reqdone-datum = l_s_reqdone-datum + 3.
            if l_s_reqdone-datum < sy-datum.
              select single * from rsiccont into l_s_iccont where
                     rnr   = l_rnr and
                     icube = p_ods.
              if sy-subrc <> 0.
                exit.
              else.
                message x000.
              endif.
            else.
               message x000. (Shortdump here)
            endif.
          endif.
          l_s_monicdp-status     = icon_red_light.
    Could you kindly let me know you face simulation issue before and possible solution?
    Thanks and best regards
    Alex yang

    Hi KP,
    Thanks for your information.
    Please check below information in ST22 side
    Error analysis
        Short text of error message:
    Status Manager *****
        Long text of error message:
        Technical information about the message:
        Message class....... "RSSTATMAN"
        Number.............. 000
        Variable 1.......... " "
        Variable 2.......... " "
        Variable 3.......... " "
        Variable 4.......... " "
    How to correct the error
        Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
        If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
        find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
        If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
        keywords:
        "MESSAGE_TYPE_X" " "
        "CL_RSSM_STATMAN_TARGET_ODSO===CP" or "CL_RSSM_STATMAN_TARGET_ODSO===CM007"
        "IF_RSBK_DATAPACKAGE_OBSERVER~UPDATE_STATUS_TABLES"
    BTW, do you think this issue will be related to larger data volum in DSO side?
    Thanks and best regards
    Alex yang

  • KKA2 incorrect results

    Hi,
    Based on the SAP note - 38070. We have configured in our landscape for new line ids. We have found that, if there is new WBS created & simulated
    in KKA2, the results are correct. Whereas for the already created wbs, we get incorrect results in KKA2 simulation.The new ids will point to old wbs & new wbs.Is this note only for new wbs?
    Please help as this is show stopper for our business.
    Kind Regards,
    Kalyan

    Here's an example of what I'm talking about.
    This first query compares a simple geometry with a second, which is defined as almost the full geographic extents (-179 , 179, -89 , 89). Nearly every possible geometry will interact with this in some way. However the result I get is 'Disjoint'.
    SELECT  SDO_GEOM.relate(MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
                2003,
                8307,
                null,
                MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003, 1),
                MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(1,   80,   1,  -80,  160,  -80,  160,  80,  1,  80)),
                'DETERMINE',
                MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
                2003,
                8307,
                null,
                MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003, 1),
                MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-179,   89,   -179,  -89,  179, -89,  179,  89,  -179,  89)), '0.005')
          from DUAL;If i make the second geometry Smaller so that it starts at 0, ie (0,179, -89, 89) the I correctly get the result 'Inside'.
    SELECT  SDO_GEOM.relate(MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
                2003,
                8307,
                null,
                MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003, 1),
                MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(1,   80,   1,  -80,  160,  -80,  160,  80,  1,  80)),
                'DETERMINE',
                MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
                2003,
                8307,
                null,
                MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003, 1),
                MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(0,   89,  0,  -89,  179, -89,  179,  89,  0,  89)), '0.005')
                from DUAL;It would be ideal if someone could confirm or deny this behaviour on a fully patched 10g or even 11g database.

Maybe you are looking for