KO88 and KI235

Im having a problem with settling an internal order in a ECC6.0 system
1.      KO88
2.     Im getting error message KI235-Account xx requires an assignment to a CO object
3.     Cost center assignment is setup in the settlement rule
4.     Im checking the cost center assignment by clicking on settlement rule and then selecting goto-.details. Cost center is present.
Note 483340 contains a possible solution if the settlement lacks cost center in u201Cgoto-detailsu201D, but I have a cost center but its not recogniIm having a problem with settling an internal order in a ECC6.0 system
1.      KO88
2.     Im getting error message KI235-Account xx requires an assignment to a CO object
3.     Cost center assignment is setup in the settlement rule
4.     Im checking the cost center assignment by clicking on settlement rule and then selecting goto-.details. Cost center is present.
Note 483340 contains a possible solution if the settlement lacks cost center in u201Cgoto-detailsu201D. Im having a cost center but its not recognised.
In the last line in the error log Im getting a message saying that Field Bus. Area is a required field for G/L account xx. u201Cgoto-detailsu201D hasnu2019t got a BA. Order has a BA assigned. Could that be something to solve first?`
Any ideas?
Br
Anders

Dear Shankar,
Thanks, your comment make sense.
I also suspected something with field status group. But settlement was OK in August, changelog for this particular account says that nothing has been changed.
I will set a BA on the offending account and testrun the settlement, its a long shoot but Im running out of ideas to solve this.
Everything, except the BA assignment looks correct.
Best regards
Anders

Similar Messages

BADI / EXIT for KO88 and KO8G to populate a warning if posting period blank

Hi,
Need is to have a user exit to populate a warning message if posting period is blank when executing these transactions KO88 and KO8G
. Can u tell me the BADI or exit for the same?
Regards

Hi ,
We can also adress this by making the posting period field mandatory using Transaction Variants ,SHD0 for KO88 , KO8G Tcodes ..
Example : Enter tcode SHDO , enter tcode as KO88 and Transaction variant as ZKO88 and click create this takes u to KO88 here enter required data and click enter gives u scree variant of K088 Initial screen here you can make the posting period field as required and save it in a separate package created in se80 , so that u can transport ..
similarly for KO8G
regrds
pushpa

Error while running KO88 and KKAO

Dear Expert,
There was cost center default for account XXXX to cost center YYY in the accounting document. Therefore, my user would like to delete the default cost center.
I have checked in OKB9 and found that account XXXX was assigned to cost center YYY; then I delete the default.
After running KKAO and KO88, there was error message: Account XXXX requires an assignment to a CO object
My question is:
Is it possible to delete the default of cost center in Accounting docement for production order process?We use KKAO (background) and KO88 for settlement.
How to solve this issue if my user would like to delete the default cost center then?
Thank you in advance.

cancelled

Diff. between CO88 and KO88?

Hi All,
1. Any difference between CO88 and KO88 transactions(Please explain clearly)?
2. Found one REVERSE menu item in the menu bar in both transactions. What is the purpose?
3. Any Functon module or BAPI to acheive same result?( Above SAP transactions are performing for Reverse and Settlement).
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
Rocky

KO88 allows you to settle production orders one at a time. You specify the order number
CO88 is a collective process and will settle all order in a plant (or all plants) that have had WIP and Variance calculations pocessed.
We use CO88 in the background as an overnight process and then use KO88 if orders needed correction and settlement individually (no point in running the entire plant to get 1 order)
KO88 and CO88 should both be tested when new processes are created.
Althea

CO88 AND KO88

Dear Gurus,
Please explain the difference between CO88 and KO88
Thanks and Regards,
Jejesh

KO88 allows you to settle production orders one at a time. You specify the order number
CO88 is a collective process and will settle all order in a plant (or all plants) that have had WIP and Variance calculations pocessed.
We use CO88 in the background as an overnight process and then use KO88 if orders needed correction and settlement individually (no point in running the entire plant to get 1 order)
KO88 and CO88 should both be tested when new processes are created.
Althea

Difference between CO88 and KO88?

Hi All,
1. Any difference between CO88 and KO88 transactions(Please explain clearly)?
2. Found one <b>REVERSE</b> menu item in the menu bar in both transactions. What is the purpose?
3. Any <b>Functon module or BAPI</b> to acheive same result?( Above SAP transactions are performing for Reverse and Settlement).
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
Rocky

KO88 allows you to settle production orders one at a time. You specify the order number
CO88 is a collective process and will settle all order in a plant (or all plants) that have had WIP and Variance calculations pocessed.
We use CO88 in the background as an overnight process and then use KO88 if orders needed correction and settlement individually (no point in running the entire plant to get 1 order)
KO88 and CO88 should both be tested when new processes are created.
Althea

Asset settlment with KO8G and KO88

Dear Experts,
What is the difference between asset settlement by KO88 and KO8G.
If i am using investment profile then is it compulsory to use KO8G.
If i am not using any AUC asset and iam booking exp for an order and settling the same to final asset what is the impact.

Hi Sekhar,
KO88 is used for settling 1 order (more day to day work) used settlement to final asset
KO8G is used periodical to select a group of internal orders used periodical posting for AUC
You need AUC for the reason that you post costs on your internal order on a 4.... cost account but at that moment it is not real costs but an asset AUC that should be posted on a 1..... balance sheet account.
With the monthly settlement you post the cost to 0 on the balance sheet account
1 Invoice
4...... deb Internal order costs
1....... cred Vendor
2 Monthly settlement
1...... deb AUC
49999 Settlement cost internal orders
3 Final settlement
1...... deb Final asset
1...... cred AUC
When you don't do step 2 you have this in costs and you don't want that.

Sap error msg no: AW624 while doing the settlement for KO88

Hi all
We are having an issue with settling the order from KO88 and we are getting the following error: msg no AW624.We are not able to settle the order beacause of this issue and the order needs be settled fast as its open form last month.iam not able to settle asset form previous year.please advice on the same.
First settle the items from the previous year in previous year 2013: 1190056/001
Message no: AW624
You have not settled all the items of investment measure in previous year.line items : 1190056/001 is not settled.it was posted in 2013 was not settled in the periodic settlement in the same fiscal year.
sap fico
aman

Dear Aman
Please refer following thread and follow Mr. Ravi's suggestion, it may help you.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1368717
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena

Product Costing and Labour Hours

Dear All
We have a basic process for product costing which follows the flow below:
0. Creation of material master which is costed (transaction MM01). If material master already exists for this material, this step is skipped;
1. Creation and release of CO production order to collect the costs of material production (KKF1);
2. Posting of actual costs to the CO production order created (goods issues, labour and services costs);
3. When production is completed, Overhead costs has to be calculated for this production order (KGI2);
4. Produced material delivery to stock has to be carried out (MB31);
5. CO production order has to be settled (KO88) and closed (KKF2).
We would like to start posting labour where the hours will be posted to a secondary cost element and included in the cost of the product. Can you please provide information on the steps to configure this.
Many thanks
PRG

Never mind

Internal Order process config details and process flow

Hi All,
Please help me,
I need process flow and configuration for assets to buy from vendors and store it and sell to our stores.
how to config Internal order configuration step by step and post to Asset management. (Instead of normal sales for revenue account).
Thanks and regards

Dear Ravi,
1. first create an internal order through KO01. That internal order type should be for investment purpose.
2. Give the relevant detials and go to investment tab and give investment profile.
3 Then in toolbar go to extras and select "asset under construction". An asset under construction would be created and give the details of this asset.
4. Then release the internal order in KO02.
5. Then go to GB60 and post a invoice with this internal order as account assignment object.
6. GO to KO02 and in extras see the order balance. that amount would be reflected in the order.
7. now go to KO88 and execute the internal order through which your internal order will be credited and AUC which you created would be debited.
8. Now go to KO02 and see the order balance it would show 0 as it is moved to AUC.
9. Now to go to settement rule and give the asset to which u want to transfer this amount and take the category as FXA and give the detials.
9. now go to KO02 and change the status of internal order to "TECO complete".
10 Now go to KO88 and execute the order and now the AUC is credited and your asset is debited.
This is the exhaustive steps which i think wil solve your purpose.
But make sure the configuration about the order type and investment profile are properly maintained.
Thanks
sap firdo

MIRO with in third item DIF (little $ difference) we get F5808&KI235 mess.

Hi,
I run MIRO for 1.000 $ invoice; we received GR = 990 $ goods. Then we have 10$ differences which goes in DIF oopération, 601101 cost element.
This cost element 601101 is in OKB9 with company code + Business Area and we wish to get the cost center.
We cannot save the invoice, we have two messages F5808 and KI235.
After debugging, we found, before going to the table OBK9, SAP losts the business area which is the CCIT / BSEG of cost element 601101 item.
Thanks for your answers
Didier

Hi
In some cases, OKB9 at detailed level does not work.. Especially for automatically generated line items
For this, you need to maintain OKB9 entry at a higher level i.e. at company code level...
OR Else,
You need to write the user exit RGGBS000 in CO Substitution
Refer notes below which says OKB9 does not work in certain cases
0000032654 High level automatic account assignment
0000105024 Automatic a/c assignment (OKB9) does not work
0000409520 Goods/invoice receipt: Default account assignment ignored
In case you wish to use the exit, refer the article written by me, which gives the logic as well as the code to be written
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b0eb4e57-c78c-2d10-e0bd-eca8728e7037
BR,Ajay M

KI235 - can post without cost object if select "continue" in profit segment

Hello all, I have a GL account where cost object is required. This works correctly and KI235 error message is given. However, if I go into the profitability segment and select CONTINUE - even though no cost object is assigned, SAP allows posting to the account without any cost object.
This seems to be a bug in SAP but I couldn't find any OSS notes related to it. We are on ECC6.0 and did a support pack upgrade in April.
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Regards, Cheryl

Hi Sridhar,
   you´re right I have the same incidence but when I try to use an automatically derived, doesn´t work If I use a standar batch input.
   In my case is with the electronic bank statements.
   thanks for your help.

FG and SFG - costing

Hi Experts,
To meet some client requirements and with some restrictions on material ledger, we are considering to have SFG and FG at moving average prices. Yes I have read and understood OSS note 81682, but I think the issues mentioned there can be overcame with the following solution. Can anyone of you review and tell me the loop holes if any.
1.     Every SFG and FG will be confirmed and taken into stock @ existing MAP. This will be taken into a specific batch.
2.     Everyday a scheduled program will be run to pick up the production orders with at least 1 qty confirmed. Do the TECO for the production order, settle it through KO88 and remove the TECO status to REL status. So that when I settle the production order the variances will flow only to the quantities existing to the production order. Or it will apportion the variance to inventory and P/L based on the quantity in stock relevant to the particular production order only.
3.     To ensure that only correct raw material quantities are flowing into the production order, back flushing is activated at all levels.
With this solution if one production order is partially confirmed and consumed to the next level before settling the same, those items will move at existing MAP. Also activity price variances will have to be monitored regularly and changed prospectively for the next period.
Best Regards
Vimal Vijayan

Hi Vimal
I would still say it is half hearted approach...
Majority share of expenses like Salary, electricity, Depreciation, etc are booked at month end... So, true variances can be calculated only after month end....
With your approach - What you will be inventorizing is Variance based on actual material cost + overhead at Standard rates... I hope you would agree on this
Before going with this approach - Take the approval of your Business people in Finance... Else, you may come at the receiving end in future
br, Ajay M

Settelment KO88

I have a prod order with some WIP in the current period as calculated by KKAX.
It's a descreet prod order with type PP01. I have not completed he only unit on order (i.e the ord qty = 1 and delivered = 0). Only some material is charged to the order.
The WIP config and posting rules are correct as far as I know.
When I run KKAX, it says "there are no amounts accrued. Settlement not possible".
I expect that the WIP calc by KKAX should be posted to FI to the account I have defined in IMG.
Any ideas, Gurus, as to why WIP won't post?
Thanks for yor time in advance.

Unfortunately, in SAP's convoluted world, even though the wip will calc in kkax, to post it you need to run KO88 and the trans is called "settlement".
The order is REL and now it posted wip via ko88 after I unchecked the "test run" box in kkax.

Error in a KO88 processing - Settlement from order to AuC

Hi Experts,
I am trying to settle an order using the transaction KO88 and the system give me the following message :
Message Text
Acquisition value negative in area 01.
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ AA (Messages for Asset Accounting)
Message number________ 617
Message variable 1____ 01
Message variable 2____
Message variable 3____
Message variable 4____ 000000040053-0000
\i need to know how to correct that and settle the order, \i finished the settlement for more than 100 order and only this ones has error
Regards,
Marcos

Hi,
I have faced this issue earlier. You have 2 options in this case.
Option 1 : As Ajay said, change the config to allow negative book value in the depn area. However i don't suggest the same because this will do away with an important validation , that the book value should never be negative. This happened only in exception cases.
Option 2 : You should mark the Asset master to allow negative values in the Tab Depn areas. Double click on the Depn area, and check the option " Negative values allowed ". With this, only for the asset, negative values are allowed. In case you don't see this field, you need to change screen layout rule so that the field is visible.
Please note once you check the negative values allowed option in the asset master, you cannot change it once you settle the Asset.
You should check the negative values allowed indicator for the AUC concerned.
Njoy
Siva

KO88 and KI235

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for