KO88/CJ88 to AUC with VAT

Hello Guys,
I have the following requirement regarding Asset self production for a french company: I need to create tax input and output tax items when capitalizing the asset (Settlementfrom the AUC => Final asset)
1/ I cannot find any standard setting to do so...If you have any solution for me don't hesitate to tell me what I can do.
2/ As I did not find any solution for the previous requirement, I try to generate these tax item at the time of the first settlement (Initial account transfered to AUC): I try to do so by customizing the TAX code into the master data of the expense account customized into the settlement rule: the account that is credited when settleling the the AUC with CJ88/KO88.
When I try to do so I get an error message asking for a VAT code for this account...
Do you have any solution for this requirement? Does this mean that the VAT could only be managed into the Invoice?
Thank you in advance for your help
Best regards
Pascal MORIZUR

Hi
I have the same requirement for a french company. Did you solve the issue and please how ?
Thanks in advance

Similar Messages

Settle an AuC with investment support

Hello Gurus,
I have the following problem:
I have some AuC with investment support measure assigned.
If I settle the AuC created in prior-years the system settle the costs and the investment support to the final assets but If I try to settle an asset created this year, the system does not settle the investment support to the final asset.
I need that when the asset under construction is created and settled to a final asset (within the same year), the investment support iis posted to the final asset aswell.
Thanks alot for your help.
Christine

Normally settlement needs to be performed twice, if the investment support measure is there.
1) for Investment object to AUC ie WBS / IO to AUC. This called automatic /AUC settlement.
2) From AUC to Final Asset: This is called final / periodic settlement.
But both these settlement needs to be executed with KO88/ CJ88.

Problem with vat in invoice

Hi all
I have the following situation in one of my invoice
Payer: DOMESTIC
Bill to: DOMESTIC
Sold to: FOREIGN
In our company only domestic customer need to pay vat
When i produce the invoice it came out with VAT ; 0.00
As I know what determine the content of the invoice came from the bill to.
despite this I get invoice with vat 0
Please your help
Thanks
Eyal

Hi Eyal,
There are some settings you should control in order for us to give you a precise answer.
During sales order processing, the system copies the tax classification from the tax information stored in the :
          - customer master record of the payer, if the payer is different from the sold-to party and the sales tax identification number is maintained for the payer.
          - ship to party, if the sales tax identification number of the ship-to party is maintained.
          - sold-to party, if none of the criteria for the payer or the ship-to party are met.
During pricing, the system calculates any relevant taxes by      taking the following factors into account:
          - The tax classification of the customer (KNVI-TAXKD) and the material
          - The country keys of the customer and the delivering plant (basically the 2 digits for the country of the plant and the payer)
After this you should control their combination (material master + customer master) in VK12 for condition type MWST - select the access sequence you're using and check the values of the condition type + validity periods.
If everything looks ok, you should check in the sales order /billing pricing determination analysis (go to the pricing tab and bellow click in the button pricing analysis and check which access sequence did the system determined for the condition type MWST.
Hope this helped....let me know.
Best regards,
Alcides Fialho

Document splitting: vendor invoice with VAT cannot be posted because of tax

Hello
I try to post a vendor invoice with document splitting active. I can post a document without VAT but with VAT (input tax 21%) I get the message "Posting possible only with zero balance" balance; balance on other line items is 210 EUR.
001 31       0000105675 Vendo                      1.000,00-                V4
002 40       0000601000 Purchase of consuma           500,00                 V4
003 40       0000601000 Purchase of consuma           500,00                 V4
In customizing for document splliting I have following categories assigned to the GL accounts:
100     399999     01000     Balance Sheet Account
411000     411000     05100     Taxes on Sales/Purchases
440000     441000     03000     Vendor
451000     451000     05100     Taxes on Sales/Purchases
500000     580000     01000     Balance Sheet Account
600000     699999     20000     Expense
700000     759010     30000     Revenue
The field status group of the tax gl account has following field optional: cost center, profit center, segment (on which document splitting is require)
What should I do so that the document splitting works also for the tax accounts so that they appear in the gl document?
kr
Arjan

Hi,
This problem does not seem to be of Document Splitting. When you post the document, balance of the document does not come to zero. This problem somewhat relates to Parrelel currency configured.
Please depict entire scenario. Let me know in which currency you are posting document and which transaction and what message system is shooting.
Straight solution can be you manually change the 210 EUR balance into document by clicking on more data.
Regards,
Chitnan Joshi.

CJ88 and AUC

hi expert SAP,
when i use to cj88 to AUC the decimals value are in Depreciation Area.
i see it too in Asset explorer and Report Raitar01.
Its a big error fiscal on system, it ' s no real have a one depreciation value on a AUC.
I usin a realese 4,6 C.
Someone know some notes OSS?
Tanx for the attention

ok,
tanks

CJ88 Cannot proceed with FUL settlement to Final asset

We have a PO with WBS as account assignment. Users posted a down payment to this PO in 12/2010 and when they ran the settlement Type 1 (Automatic) it posted a DP posting to the AUC transaction type 180.
In Standard SAP transaction, this will get reversed if the users post the invoice and executes CJ88 again.
Now, our problem is that, the invoice was not posted until now, and the DP is still open in the AUC. THey want to do settlement to the final asset but is getting an error CJ88 type 3 (FULL)
*ORIGINAL Error:* You cannot post comp. retirement for asset 102000121 0 with this trans.type
Message no. AA341
Diagnosis
A down payment was posted to asset 102000121 0. In depreciation area 01, if not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
Procedure
Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
FY 2010 is now closed in asset. I tried posting an ofsetting entry for the DP on FY2011. I used ttype 181. I tried to re-setlle type 3 (FULL) but now, the error message refers to Area 32
*AFTER POSTING TTYPE 181:*You cannot post comp.retirement for asset 102000121 0 with this trans.type
Message no. AA341
Diagnosis
A down payment was posted to asset 102000121 0. In depreciation area 32, if not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
Procedure
Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
Our Dep area 32 is configured to take values from 01 but reflect it in USD and it is set to AREA NOT POST.
Does anyone have any thoughts why the system is checking area 32 if its deriving values from 01?
Additionally, how can i clear the DP in 2010, with a posting in 2011 and be able to execute the settlement to final asset.
Thanks

Hi,
Please review the note 35309.
As the long text of the error suggests, the cause for this error is most likely down to downpayments which are not yet settled.
In general the settled down-payments and their clearings should be balanced to ZERO in the settlements.
In investment measures with summary settlement you will always get the error AA341, if the down-payment balance is not zero.
Regards Bernhard

Adjustment of advance payment after adjusting AUC with Main Asset

HI,
My client is running KO88 without adjusting advance payment for Asset Purchase (AUC). Now this has led to accumulated advance payment with a huge amount. The purchase has taken place for more than 3 years.
Kindly suggest, what is the correct step for adjusting down payment when we do purchase of assets through MM route.
example: Please correct me if I am wrong.
Step 1: Asset PO- ME21N with Internal Order and Acct Assignment category as A
Step 2: Advance Payment- F-47, F-48
Step 2: GRN- MIGO
Step 3: MIRO
Step 4: F-54
Step 5: KO88
Finally, how do we correct these old advance payments which are not adjusted yet and the KO88 is run. Ajay Maheshwari SAP Trainer

So, what u r suggesting is, no need to reverse the Old AUC settlement in KO88. We can clear the old advances in F-54 and then execute KO88 which means- Re-execute KO88 after advance clearance.
The issue here is, all the old advances have accumulated since, 2011. Now, how to work?
Please advice Ajay Maheshwari SAP Trainer, Mukthar Ali Ahamed N.

How to post AUC with TDS

Dear Experts,
I am working on assets, here I need to post AUC which includes TDS.
Please suggest me, through which transaction code I need to post and what transaction type I need to select while posting.
Please suggest me ASAP...
Regards,
Krsnaveni
Edited by: krsna83 on Aug 16, 2011 9:13 AM

Dear Krisnaveni,
Adding to above all have a look at below explanation.
During settlement, some or all of the plan or actual costs incurred on an object are allocated to one or more receivers. The system automatically generates offsetting entries to credit the sender object. The debit postings assigned once to a sender object remain in place, even after settlement to a receiver (and can therefore be displayed). The costs settled are updated on the corresponding receiver object and displayed in reporting.
In general business we use the WBS or Internal Order to post the transaction as an assignment. Transaction herein termed as expenses douments or general business transaction entries where CO Object is mandatory to assign, again this can be achieved by making P & L account type GL's as cost element from KA01.
When you create the GL as cost element it asks for CO object that time we can assign IO or WBS or any relevant CO object. Here in this way we accumulate the cost over WBS or IO. I hope your system is prepared with required Settlement configuration.
Now coming to settlement query - Settlement is nothing but to transferring of cost or say accumulated amount of said IO or WBS ( CO Object ) from one to another receiver. Here in AuC scenario sender is IO and receiver is AuC asset.
To achieve this we need to maintain settlement rule in IO master data through KO02. After clicking Settlement Rule maintain the proper details as in Category give FXA as a Asset , next will ask you a asset, mention here your AuC asset no. , percentage would be 100 % or partial maintained it. FULL or PARTIAL settlement may be depeneds upon business requirement. Simple SAVE and run KO88 for actual settlement.
Since your query asking for direct capilization of AuC asset which is not possible from any T.code hence we cannot post TDS to the same. Experts please correct If I am wrong.
TDS line items are generated automatically because of configuration only ! ! ! ! For calculating and posting TDS we need to maintained the TDS tax codes in vendor master a need to follow the withholding tax configuration steps.
AuC and TDS are two different areas. Which you want to go for determine first and get back to forum.
I hope this will help you to understand the functionality, as well help you to resolve your query, doubts. If you have still feel free to share - You are welcome !
Regards,
Pankaj A Bhalerao.

Accounts rceievable analysis report with VAT inclusion

Hi All,
I have been asked to include the VAT amount paid by each customer in the Accounts recievable and payable analysis report.
The problem is posting for VAT goes to General Ledger and the total amount is posted to Customer.
The report currently in BW doesnt give the split of the amount for a customer.
We have a cube which stores all the FI-AR line items and we have a ODS which stores GL line items.
The GL line item ODS obiviously doesnt have customer number.
I tried creating a multiprovider on the FI-AR cube and GL ODS but didnt get the expected result.
Can anyone please suggest on how to approach this problem.
Points will be rewarded..
Thanks
Sundar

Update:
Within the \config\xml\migration-config_PreMigrationAnalysis.xml configuration file you can control the buffering of records. I changed the buffer size from 15000 to 10 and now any object type with count over 10 fails on the 11th object of that type.
Next step: Check the behaviour of the other configurations.

<properties>
     
     <property name="url" value="http://qat.idm.com"/>
     <property name="username" value="idm-config"/>
     
     <property name="objectReportDirLocation" value="./reports"/>
     
     <property name="reportRecordsLimit" value="15"/>
     
     <property name="requireLocalSession" value="false"/>
     
     <property name="bufferQuery" value="true"/>
     
     <property name="bufferSize" value="10"/>
</properties>

Need some help with VAT Setup

Here is my scenario.
We're dealing with a partner in Germany. We will be shipping them parts from the US and need to slap on a 19% VAT surcharge when invoiced.
I can get the VAT to calculate correctly on the SO and Invoice, the issue is that it will not post to accounting because of the below error:
Tax statement item missing for tax code O1
Here is my setup:
I am using condition type MWST, access sequence Country(US)/Destination Country(DE) Amount 19%, Tax Code O1
In OB40, under key MWS, I have the GL account entered for the Tax Code and Accounts are determined for Tax Code.
I looked at the GL itself and in the control section, the tax category has a * meaning all tax types are allowed. It's also configured to post w/o a tax code present.
I'm at a loss, is my setup missing something or completely incorrect?

After kicking this around for a few days I'm still lost as to the issue
The new error I get is "Condition type MWST tax code O1 does not exist".
"When calculating tax, the system tried to determine the
condition amount and the condition number from tables A003
and A053 using the specified condition type and tax code.
However, no values were found there."
I discovered this SoldTo had a jurisdiction code and as soon as I removed it, I got past the earlier error and run into this one now. It appears it defaults to the jur. code for our main office if one isn't assigned to the sold to. I looked at these tables and these are the condition tables behind the MWST access sequence for tax condition types.
Here is my scenario again, please help me confirm I am approaching it the right way.
Need to collect 19% VAT when shipping from US plant to Germany.
I am using condition type MWST on the pricing procedure and this has an entry in VK13 to apply the 19% tax based on source/destination country. This seems to be working, it pulls it in ok onto the order in the tax field. I am using tax code O1 in the VK13 entry. I assume this is used in conjunction with the TAXUSJ procedure and will be used to calculate the right tax amounts.
I assume that since the source country is US, the tax calculation procedure TAXUSJ is where I need to do any config. I added a MWAS condition type which points to AccKey MWS. However, in FTXP I cannot enter in any percentage here. The field is greyed out. Within VK12, the only options I have for tax codes are from TAXUSJ.
I'm assuming that when trying to post to accounting this is where it's getting stuck since it can't find an entry in the condition tables behind this.
Can someone who's more of an expert on this please confirm my approach is correct. How can I get this tax in the TAXUSJ procedure?

Return invoce with VAT

Dear experts
1)
One PO (Original -for Receipt of Material)-Created in name of company A
(Excise Invoice Directly from Parent Company B)
MIGO (GRN) in name of company A who is dealer of company B
All the documents are generated in SAP with the Name of company A based on GRN.
While return process-->We want that the Excise Invoice to be generated in the name of
company B whom we have to return the excise back.
Please let me know how to do
2)
While return process--> in return excise invoice, only excise values are indicated and VAT
/Additional VAT is not indicated. can we make a provision for indicating /capturing VAT/
Additional VAT in Return Excise Invoice. This will help us in case of return of material
after VAT is captured in MIRO .
Please let me know how to do
Regards
Amsi

Hi All ,
I want to change the attribute of message ME 640 (Return with SD delivery not possible for consignment items ) from E to W.
But I could able to find this message in SPRO - > Purchasing env data -> define attributes of system message
where I can find this message
Regards
Suresh/-

Issue with VAT ID in Vendor Master

Hi All,
While creating Vendor Master ,system is not accepting VAT ID:
Error message is "VAT registration number contains invalid characters"
Input VAT ID :GB0109413534
Vendor Country : GB (United Kingdom)
I checked country settings also:
VAT registration no. 14 1 Maximum value length, without gaps
I am inputting 12 characters only ,without any gaps.
Please guide .
Regards,
Payal Saxena

Dear Payal,
This GB tax code is not valid. Please check the following website:
http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/vies/
if you still need to save the vendor with this Vat reg number, you should unflag the GB settings in order to not check the validity of the vat registration numbers.
or vendor, can provide the correct vat registration number.
I hope it helps
Silvia

Invoice with VAT

Hello together,
I work for a german company and we ordered the Adobe Creativ Cloud. Now, two months later we saw that we can also enter our VAT-ID, which makes it possible to pay our invoices without taxes. Now I want to ask whether it is possible to get the older invoices, that we paid with taxes for, once again, so we get back our pre-paid taxes of these invoices.
Where do I have to go? Whom do I have to speak to?
Thank you for your help!
kellanie

Hi kellanie ,
The VAT ID can be updated. For more information on the VAT charges you may see - http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/adobe-stores-online-order-payment-faq.ht ml
Alternatively you may contact the Adobe Support here for more information on your account and the VAT charges.
^Ani

Problem with VAT

Dear All,
I have to show both Sales Price and VAT in same ALV grid, i, e using tcode VK13, I have to show this. Users use VK13
condition type(KSCHL)- VKP0 to see the sales price(KBETR) values and
                       ZVT1 to see VAT(KBETR) values.
But they dont want to use radio buttons now, they need to see both the Sales Price and VAT in same grid. I tried several ways. But the problem here i found is Sales Price uses table A073 for getting Condition record no(KNUMH), where VAT uses table A004 for getting Condition record no(KNUMH). But the table KONP holds both Sales Price and VAT in KBETR,based on KNUMH. I am unable to marge this two tables. The selection parameters will be - Sales Org(VKORG), Distribution Channel(VTWEG), Material no(MATNR), Valid on(DATAM). Plz give me some idea.
With regards,
Roslaine.

Hi Rosaline,
I copy a coding to get the data of percentage of VAT (in my case for Spain, check in tcode FTXP the parameters for your country) as a sample for your coding.
data: clasif_mt like mlan-taxm1,
        clasif_cl like knvi-taxkd,
        percentage like konp-kbetr.
select single taxm1 into clasif_mt from mlan
      where matnr = p_matnr
      and   aland = 'ES'.
select single taxkd into clasif_cl from knvi
      where kunnr = p_kunnr
      and   aland = 'ES'
      and   tatyp = 'MWST'.        "your SD condition (VK13)
select * from a002
    into table i_a002
      where kappl = 'V'
      and   kschl = 'MWST'
      and   aland = 'ES'
      and   taxk1 = clasif_cl
      and   taxm1 = clasif_mt.
delete i_a002 where datbi < pp_fecha.
read table i_a002 index 1.   "??? debug it and see the data
select single * from konp
     where knumh = i_a002-knumh.
percentage = konp-kbetr / 10.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

F-32 clears differences with VAT

Hello all,
We have aproblem that I hope you could help us with.
We are trying to clear 2 documents using Tx. F-32. The difference between them is 0.52 Eur. When we post it (choosing a reason code) creates an extra line with the VAT and this is wrong.
Does anyone know how to stop the system from calculating the taxes when posting the differences?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards.

Hi,
Go to first option standard. After selecting the two line item system will show you difference in not assigned column. Double click on difference postings which is above the not assigned. System will post the difference to the same customer.
Regards

KO88/CJ88 to AUC with VAT

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for