KO88- settlement error

Dear Experts,
while doing KO88 settlement I am getting the error "Reverse posting key specification is missing for posting key 81" with message no: F5 522. But i have checked in the order there is no deletions OR reversing.
I don't understand why the system is throwing the error.
Please anyone can help me.
Regards,
satish

Hi
Please check in the drop down menu or transaction ob41 whether 81 & 91 exists or not.As these are standard posting keys.
If not try to check with your FI team whether they are using any customised posting keys and tell them to assign this.
Normally the settings you are making right now must be done with the coordination of FI team only in order to avoid any discrepencies in the future.
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/production-order-settlement-177739
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Internal Order settlement Error

    While doing KO88 an error is coming
    Kindly please provide me the solution ; Its very urgent
    The error is :
    Customizing inconsistency (contact your system administrator)
        Message no. AC496
    Diagnosis
        Company code 7500 manages parallel currencies in Asset Accounting. For
        each area that posts automatically online to FI, you have to define one
        dependent depreciation area that adopts both identical values and
        depreciation terms from depreciation area 01, and which is assigned to
        currency type 30 and currency INR. There is no depreciation area of this
        type defined for depreciation area 01.
    Procedure
        Check your Customizing settings.

    Hi
    Please check the Asset accounting configuratuion settings of OAYH (defining the depreciation areas for foreign curriencies and OABT for specifying the use of parellel currencies.
    I hope this may solve your problem.
    Regards
    Karun

  • Error : complete allocation structure while doing Ko88 settlement.

    Message no. KD503
    Diagnosis
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
    Cost element S10100 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A2, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
    Procedure
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    If the posting under cost element S10100 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
    a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
    If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
    You can update allocation structure A2

    Dear,
    Please refer my reply in this thread,
    Error in Rework order settlement
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Settlement error

    Hi experts,
    While doing settlement through KO88,system gives following error:
    Complete allocation structure A1
    Message no. KD503
    Diagnosis
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
    Cost element 800315 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
    Procedure
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    If the posting under cost element 800315 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
    a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
    If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
    You can update allocation structure A1
    Please advise,
    Regards,
    Samaar

    Hi Guru's
    We are also facing same issue.  By mistake our implementation partner has configured cost element category as 01 instead of 22.  When we try to run S_ALR_87013558 -- actual cost in the report is getting doubled.  The cost element for settlement created by the CO team is of category 1 ( expense type) because of this after settlement the expenses get added. The cost element for settlement should be of category 22 which is by default exempt from budget.
    This is s serious problem.  Please help us urgently

  • Process order settlement error

    Hi all
            while doing settlement of process order in KO88, system throwing the follwing error.
                     '' valuation data for the material is being locked by the user xxxxxx'' .     If we check in transaction: SM12 , here system showing MARA, MARC tables being locked.
            Some background jobs also running which include MARA,MARC tables.   so please suggest me the best way to do settlement of process orders.  The background jobs should not stop.
    thanks
    sapproduction

    HI
    At the  same time one masters like material WC or PV cannot be processed the database tables used are locked while processing the same to get resolve this  check the time  of scheduled jobs which uses tables like MARA MARC after the finish of these jobs you can process the settlement if you get unlock the data from T code SM12 there is possibility of getting data lost. so
    you can define your settlement process and schedule it just after the completion of those previous Jobs.
    Check and revert
    Regards
    Anupam Sharma

  • KO88:Internal error in FORM/FUNCTION CKMLKEPH_ROLLUP in position 2 with RC

    hi,expert,
       When i settle production order , it issue MLCSS099 error.
       The message is ' Internal error in FORM/FUNCTION CKMLKEPH_ROLLUP in position 2 with RC 8'.
       The report 'MLCCS_KO88_TREATMENT' can not solve the problem.
       How to correct this?
      Thanks for advance.
    Tony

    Hi Tony,
    The error during the order settlement is produced because in earlier
    periods the cost component split for standard price is missing
    for the materials involved in the order that you are trying to settle
    with KO88.
    Please, change the settings in report MLCCS_KO88_TREATMENT to treatment
    option "S" for this order as explained in the note 623701.
    You need to delete the existing entry settings in program
    MLCCS_KO88_TREATMENT first.
    Afterwards, it should be possible to maintain the new settings for
    period ?/2011 (treatment type 'Split Delta by S price').
    Therefore, the steps should be:
    1. Delete the existing entry in program MLCCS_KO88_TREATMENT
       (-> processing type: delete settings), for the company code
       and period X/XXXX.
    2. Maintain option = 'Split Delta according to Standard Price,'
       with report MLCCS_KO88_TREATMENT for the orders that are causing
       the problem and period X/2011.
    I hope this helps you to solve the problem.
    Kind regards,
    MLM

  • AIAB Distribution Rule for Settlement Error, "Asset cannot settle to itself"

    Hello Everyone,
    I have a customer who is getting the "asset cannot settle to itself" error when trying to set up a distribution rule to settle the remaining items of a Line Item Managed AUC to multiple Assets.  The Asset numbers and AUC number do NOT match.  Here are the steps that have been followed.
    Created an Internal Order, #2000####. (1998)
    Created the AuC asset. #600####(2011)
    Created Settlement Rule (Sender – Internal Order, Receiver - AUC) (2011
    Settle Internal Order to AUC.
    Create Assets. (2014). #900###1 - #900##99 etc.
    Create Settlement Rule (Sender – AUC, Receiver – Multiple Assets)  This is where my customer gets the error. 
    They were able to settle other items from this AuC to Assets last October.  It seems very strange to me that the Internal Order was created in 1998 and the AUC was created in 2011 but as I said, this was working at least last October and possibly in March of this year. 
    Thanks for you help.
    Rick 

    Hello Stacy, 
     Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but I just had a major implementation go live on the 2nd so I've been rather busy.  I opened a ticket with SAP on this and this is what was found.   
    Joachim from SAP Support explained that the AUC had been settled to itself last year, that is the posting the program was throwing the error on.  My assumption is that we were able to settle AUC's to themselves prior to our March upgrade.  This explains the problem and we have a resolution.  We are transferring AUCs that this has happened with to a new AUC and then settling the new AUC as usual.  
    I believe SAP fixed a bug that had previously allowed AUC's to settle to themselves in one of the updates but because this AUC had a record from the past where it settled to itself the program was validating old line items and that is why it throws the error.   
    Ramnik's suggestion was another option but we didn't want to change the message to a warning because we didn't want anyone to settle an asset to itself.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Rick

  • Sales order settlement error

    Hi all,
    I getting an error when i created a sales order, while saving the system through an error : settlemet profile zz1 does not exits"
    the same i simulated in the Quality system it is working fine.
    when i have done the analysis, the settlement profile ZZ1 is not there in both the system.
    can any on please give  light on this.
    thanks
    Kuntla

    Dear GopalKrishna,
    Check with:
    T. Code: VA88
    > Environment> Customize Settlement.
    For more, read:
    Sales order settlemet-VA88
    Hope, this information may help you.
    Best Regards,
    Amit

  • Settlement Error : Message No. KD561

    My client has the following requirement,
    For Example,
    Client has undertaken a million dollar project for a customer. It has encurred a cost (for example say $500k). The WBSE element used to caputre the cost is defined as Account Assignment as well as Billing element. The project reaches a certain milestone and the customer is send a invoice for a payment of $100K. We have assigned the same WBSE during the creation of Sales order and created the billing invoice of $100K. We are not using the milestone. The above cost is Expense and not to be captalized. The revenue received from the customer is to be booked against the cost incuured on the project. At the end of the month, we settle all the cost on the expense project to the Cost Center.
    When I run CJI3 for that particular WBSE, following are the entires,
    a.........Dr. 500K
    b........Cr.  100K
    Total Cost ...400K
    At the end of the month, when I am trying to settle the WBSE to the cost center (in the settlement profile, CCtr is a valid reciever), it gives me the below error message,
    "Settlmnt from revenues/debit-side down paymnts to receiver CTR 101500015 not allowed
    Message no. KD561
    Diagnosis
    The sender has revenues or customer down payments with cost element 51810010 (business transaction: CO Through-postings from FI).
    You cannot settle these revenues or customer down payments to receiver CTR 101500015.
    Procedure
    Change the settlement rule for the sender. It can be useful, for example, to use a source structure to settle costs and revenues separately to different receivers.
    Note
    Revenues or customer down payments can only be settled to G/L accounts, profitability segments, sales documents, real estate objects, orders with revenues, or WBS elements."
    Any suggestion would be appreciated. Any suggestion for the alternative ways to perform the above scenarios.?
    Regards,

    Dear Jatin,
    There is a confusion in your statement, in the first line you have mentioned
    Client has undertaken a million dollar project for a customer
    So we understand it to be a Customer Project, for which there will be a revenue.Further in your query you have mentioned,
    At the end of the month, we settle all the cost on the expense project to the Cost Center
    Here you have mentioned it as Expense project, so should we assume it as "Overhead Cost Project",If it is so then your settlement to cost center is correct,In this case you should not generate any revenue.
    But if your first statement is correct, then your settlement reciever should be reconsidered as mentioned by Praveen.

  • WBS Element settlement error

    Dear All
    My query is the prj is EP & WBS El is EP-99, under EP-99 the avialable values are Rs192,523/- as per different cost element wise. Those values have to settled on an one AUC-asset & the value will be settled periodicaly. My posted values are in 10th/2008 & I want to settled the said  values in 10th prd. But after processing of CJ88 the error has been raised "There no accured amounts settlement is not possible" Also note that Other WBSE has been settled under said prj.
    Please help me.
    Regards
    Avijit Barman

    Dear All
    My query is the prj is EP & WBS El is EP-99, under EP-99 the avialable values are Rs192,523/- as per different cost element wise. Those values have to settled on an one AUC-asset & the value will be settled periodicaly. My posted values are in 10th/2008 & I want to settled the said  values in 10th prd. But after processing of CJ88 the error has been raised "There no accured amounts settlement is not possible" Also note that Other WBSE has been settled under said prj.
    Please help me.
    Regards
    Avijit Barman

  • Asset Value date in KO88 Settlement type=FUL

    We do KO88 for Settlement type=PER and the posting date and value date are the end of the month.
    But if we do Settlement type=FUL the posting date is end of the month and Asset value date is not (for the example we made it is 15/MM )
    This is wrong and the customization of the default asset value date is Posting date.
    OSS says it is consulting
    Regards,
    Alon G.

    Hi
    Check OSS Note : Note 98496 - Information: Asset value date in settlement to fixed assets.
    https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=98496
    The above not explains the logic as how the Value Date is determined during settlement.  The above not is release independent hence applies to all SAP Releases.
    Thanks
    Prasad

  • WBS Settlement error

    Hi,
    We have a negative balance in area 02 of AuC. We cannot settle that to asset as no negative values are allowed to fixed assets and we cannot change that setting too. Now we posted a manual correction entry to WBS and settled it to AuC to nullify the balance in area 02. The balance got nullified in AuC but we are getting the error " Acq value -ve in area 02" for the fixed asset. Is there any way by which we can get rid of this so that we can make further postings to WBS and settle the same to fixed asset?
    Regards,
    DP

    HI DP,
    The cleanest procedure is to allow the negative posting, either at the asset or change configuration.
    SPRO > Financial Accounting > Asset Accounting > Valuation > Depreciation Areas > Define Depreciation Areas
    and
    SPRO > Financial Accounting > Asset Accounting > Valuation > Depreciation Areas > Determine Depreciation Areas in the Asset Class (OAYZ)
    You state you cannot change the negative value setting...it can be changed technically, so are you stating there is a procedural reason you cannot change?
    Regards,
    Kent Bettisworth

  • OPEX settlement error

    Hi Guys,
    I have a problem when trying to settle the opex project. I get error message "For document type SA, an entry is required in field Doc. Hdr Text". There was a journal created against the project and the document header field was filled. The settlement rule is cost center.
    Thanks
    Koko

    Hi,
    Please refer SAP Note 770285.
    Hope it will be helpful.
    Tnx.
    abdul.

  • Consignment and pipeline settlement error

    Hi Expert!
    I have error when processing consignment and pipeline settlement for company code 4424. The error is "No message was found for partner 146073/company code 4424". Can anyone tell me what has going wrong and how to solve it?
    Thanks.

    HI,
    The MRKO Transaction only for settling the Pipe line and Consigmnet pscenarions.
    No effect if u maintain as like that.
    If u have doubt do one in Devlopmet.
    Regards,
    Andra

  • MRIS- invoice plan settlement error

    I have created invoice plan using the standard SAP supplied periodic invoicing plan. When I go to tx MRIS and enter  Co code, plant, vendor, purch doc and then in document selection 3( I have tried 1, 2 and 3) but I get an error " no document selected" I also have created output for Invoice with co code combination
    What am I missing? Need help
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi,
    If you are not going to send the payments automaticaly via ERS, then you must post the invoices normally via MIRO with reference to that PO. the system will then check the value and the dates on the invoice plan to see if the invoice should be cleared for payment or blocked.
    MRIS is only used if you want to settle the payments without entering an invoice (i.e. automatically as the oayment dates fall due)
    Steve B

Maybe you are looking for