KSUB - Plan Assessment

Hi Guys!
When I execute cycle in plan assessment [ T-Code KSUB], I received a SAP office express info [ Business Workplace] " Express document " Update was terminated" received from author "  ". I view the report but there's no changes in data. Is the system terminate update?

HI,
Termination with an erroe "Express Document" in most of teh cases is due to the overlap of number ranges.
Check the number ranges in KANK and set the current status to a higher level and run the assessment cyclenow.
It should solve your problem.
Reward if useful.
sarma

Similar Messages

  • KSUB - Plan assessment report currency

    Hi,
    I'm executing plan assessment cycle and i found the report showing (sender, receiver listing) currency in USD. Can help me to advice on how I can change the report to local curency/company code currency?
    Best regards,
    Shanti

    Hi
    After executing KSUB - Using the Menu options - choose LAYOUT - Object Currency / Comp Code Currency
    br, Ajay M

  • Exchange rate type P not getting picked up while executing KSUB-Plan Assess

    Hi,
    We have Exchange rate type "P" maintained in SPRO in Maintain versions for the Fiscal Year 2010, but even then when I execute KSUB, it posts with Exchange rate type M.
    Has anyone faced this issue? We want it to pick up P and not M.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

    Hi, set it here IMG-Controlling-Cost Center Accounting-Planning-Basic Settings for Planning-Define versions-Maintain Settings of Version in Controlling Area    then Setting for each f. year , double click on current f.year

  • Plan assessment

    Hi guys,
    Iam using t-code KSUB (plan assessment).  Everytime i run this plan assessment, message will appear as "Express Document Update was terminated received from author", an SAP office express info.  I dont know why, coz this is the first time i've encountered this kind of message.  And assessment has never been updated. Do we need to configure this?
    Thanks and more power...
    kay

    HI,
    Termination with an error "Express Document" in most of teh cases is due to the overlap of number ranges.
    Check the number ranges in KANK and set the current status to a higher level and run the assessment cycle now.
    It should solve your problem.
    Reward if useful.
    sarma

  • KSUB - Cost Center Plan Assessment

    Hi All,
    I am doing a Plan Assessment for Cost Center in Trans KSUB and i need a Sender & Receiver Line items by Plant... I tried to use Filter but Plant is not present.
    I will be glad if anyone can help me out..
    Thanks & Regards
    Ajoy

    Hi,
    You can use only CO entities as senders/receivers, e.g. cost centres, internal orders, WBS, etc.
    Plant is not a CO entity and therefore cannot be used as an object in assessment cycle.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Exchange Rate Type not working during plan assessment in T Code KSUB

    Hello Experts
    We had different exchange rate types created for different plan versions. We had Exchange Rate Type Z1 for Plan Version 01.
    We had maintained the same in Planning settings for the fiscal year 2011.
    We had created a new plan assessment cycle with version 1.
    Now when we execute assessment cycle it is not using the exchange rate from 01/01/2011. Instead it is selecting the rate from 01/01/2010.
    Is there something wrong when we copied fiscal year 2011 from 2010 for version 01.
    Request your inputs and help on this.
    Thanks
    Satya Alapati

    Hi Ajay
    Thanks for the information.
    We had not maintained the value date for any of our versions since we keep changing the rates for every period and wish to have the system pick the latest rate for the period.
    It has been the case in earlier years also.
    Thanks
    Satya

  • Plan Assessment and Allocation for Service Orders (CS)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to run plan assessment (KSUB) and plan allocation (KO9E) for a service order (created via IW31), but I'm not able to do it.
    I can do assessments (KSU5) and allocations (KO8G) with real values, but since I'm not able to do it in plan mode, I can't have comparative values between real and planned values (no value is flowing to allocation secondary cost elements).
    Can anyone let me know if this is some sort of limitation for Service Orders? Because I checked SPRO in transaction code KOAI and for this type of orders there is no Indicator for Integrated Planning, nor it's possible to assign a planning profile.
    Many thanks for any help you can provide!
    Regards,
    Cátia

    I created a SAP message and they confirmed that this is not possible.

  • In  KEU9 - plan assessment cycle,  receiver   ' company code' means what

    Hi
    In  KEU9,    plan assessment cycle for  copa,   in  RECEIVER there are many  eg...product, WBS ,  company code.
    How  does  the  assessemnt   happen for   receiver ' company code'
    Thanks
    kamala

    HI,
    To reflect all the actual costs from Overhead Cost Controlling in Profitability Analysis, you need to transfer the cost center costs  which are not directly attributable to the production process. You can transfer these costs to any profitability segments you wish and thus assign them to any level of your contribution margin hierarchies.
    That way you can assign them to the level that best reflects the cause of the overhead.
    For example, you can assign the costs that arose in the marketing for a certain customer group to that particular customer group in CO-PA. Similarly, the fixed costs and the excess costs in production should be assigned to the products or product groups that caused these costs.
    If you assess the overhead costs to Company Code level, then in your KE30 report these costs are available at Company code level which you can't drill down to lower level.
    Hope this helps.

  • Copying Plan Assessment Version from V0 To Z1

    Hi All,
    Need assistance in how to Copy & run plan assessment in a different version fom V0 to Z1
    I have copied tried copying  planning data (KP06) using transaction KP97, however it did not transfer the assessments we had established via KSU9 in version 0 for our building and IT.
    Can any one help me in copying plan assessment version from one to another.
    Thanks In advance
    Arun

    Hi,
    This is standard SAP behaviour (read note 15966); you have to execute the assessment cycles in the target version separately.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Table FAGLFLEXT - Functional Area blank for plan assessment cycle (result)

    Hi all,
    I have query regarding table FAGLFLEXT. We have plan data and need to report our plan data based on functional area and profit centres. Plan assessment was run and this is allocation from a cost centre to WBS.
    In table FAGLFLEXT for this line items there's 2 lines created and in one of the line item the functional area is blank.
    Is this a bug or is this standard SAP? Does anybody has experience on this table?
    thanks

    Refer to note 1024480 and see if the situation applies to your system.

  • Plan assessment cycle reversal

    Hi Experts,
    I have a problem with reversal. The situation is like this
    1. I have two assessment cycles C1 and C2 which are to be executed in sequence. The cycle posts to some participating cost centers in cycle C2. These cost centers have their own costs as well.
    2. Both the cycles are executed in sequence. When the cycle C2 is reversed, the amounts are not appearing in the sending cost centers of C2. The reversal documents are posted for very small amounts( residues in the cost centers after assessment eg. 0.01 and 0.03 etc.
    Is there any restriction for reversal when multiple sequential cycles are involved? The transaction used is KSUB

    Thank U for prompt response Ram000
    I have been using these cycles for last 4 periods. When I reversed the cycle in KSUB, reversal documents are posted for the small amounts as I mentioned earliar. The earlier transferred amounts are not returned to sender cost centers.
    When I try to reverse again, the system messages that the cycle is not run yet.
    If I run the cycle again, there is no assessment as senders do not have any values.
    By the way is there any way to get rid of the planning data (primary as well as secondary) for a period?
    Both KP90 and KP91 are for a fiscal year.

  • Cost Center Assessment - cost element type 42

    Hi dear All,
    I got issues running KSU5 to allocate planned costs under cost element type 42. we were expecting that all planned costs (primary and secondary(cost element type 42)) could be allocated by credit cost center (actual). only primary costs are being allocated.
    Scenario:
    cost center planning (kp06) 1000 currencies in primary cost element in cost center A
    running planning assessment - KSUB: cycle uses assessment cost element (type 42): sender cost center A, receiver cost center B (all planned values). assessment cyles posts 1000 currencies from CC A to cost center B
    planning in cost center B (primary cost elements through kp06, 500 currencies) total planning 1000 from previous assessment  with CE type 42, and 500 from cc planning in a primari CE.
    by the period end closing, tcode KSU5 (allocation actual) is running. new cycle created, based on planned values (origini not actual, but planned amounts).
    we were expecting to allocate 1500 currencies from cost center B to cost center C (using 100% and through assessment cost element)).
    result: credit actual cost center B = 500 currencies debit actual cost center C = 500 currencies.
    1000 currencies pending on cost center B (planned).
    do you know why SAP is not allocating the 1000? even if those 1000 were planned in cost center B by assessement, a new allocation cycle should be able to post them or not?
    thank you for your outcome.

    Hi dear Ajay, thank you for your answer.
    first, I understand the difference between KSUB and KSU5, in the defined scenario, we have both. planned values, become actual with the MEC activities. business definition.
    regarding the cycle, I have setup assessment cost element so we can get all planned lines posted as 1.
    On sender tab I have only the cost center. no cost element defined.
    receiver its cost center.
    furthermore, i've not setup allocation structure, so all cost elements should be allow, there is no restriction on this.
    the only difference is: planned costs which their origin is already an assessment are not being assessed again.
    I can show you the print screens with cycles setup if it helps
    best regards
    MF

  • Actual Assessment and distribution cycles

    Hi Guys:
                       I have gone through planning assessment cycles , their execution and activity rate calculation. Now i want to do actual cycles. I am confused about the starting point of actual cycles. I understand that service cost centers are the one which need to be apportioned to the receiving cost center. Service cost centers like Electricity have posting in them through FI and their accumulated cost needs to be apportioned to production cost center through actual run.For actual cycles to be executed what should be the starting point. Like in planning i started from KP06,did KSU7 and KSUB, then moved to KP26,did KSS4 and finally KSPI. This planned activity rate is supposed to be used in computing actual activity cost when actual quantities are confirmed from PP. Please guide me through the process.
    Br
    Moderator: Please, search before posting

    Hi:
           Thanks for reply. I did KSU1 and KSU5 , now at the time of test run KSS2, it showed me some warning messages as shown under
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/FOH
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/LABOR
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/VOH
    Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZSNPL: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
    Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZAINS: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
    Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZMISC: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/FOH
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/LABOR
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/VOH
    Cost center CTR 1000/1303004, cost element ZSNPL: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
    Br

  • New plan version - Copy from plan to plan

    Hello,
    I copied a new plan version X from plan version 0 with KP97. Now I realized that only planning primary costs were copied. Is it possible to copy also the secondary costs (resulting from assessments) to the new plan version. If not, is it possible to copy the plan assessment cycles from version 0 to version X. Or can the existing plan cycles (KSUB) can be used for both versions (hoever I could not find a selection field where I can choose the required plan version)?
    Thank you in advance for your feedback.
    Ali

    Hi,
    a plan assessment cycle contains CO-version information in its header date.
    You can use KSU7 to copy a plan assessment cycle from version A to version B, just enter CO-version B in the header data of the copied cycle and ensure that in "sender values" the version is initial (thus the header data CO-version takes place).
    BR Christian

  • BAPI to create/change assessment cycle

    Dear ABAP expert ,
      Anyone can advise the BAPI
    - To Create cost center Actual/Plan assessment cycle (KSU1, KSU7)
    - To Change cost center Actual/Plan assessment cycle (KSU2, KSU8), in case the cycle already exist and user would like to update tracing factor or change parameter in the cycle.
      We try to avoid BDC as the screen is very dynamic.
    Thank you
    Anothai

    Rob is correct.
    Your other cross-posted threads will be deleted / locked.
    Please read [the rules|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement] before posting again.
    We don't have many rules here, but they are good ones.
    Julius

Maybe you are looking for