L2VPN Interworking Problem

There is a scenario:
(CE1)7600-----FE VLAN(dot1q)-----(PE1)7200VXR(NPE300)----FE----(PE2)7200VXR(NPE400)----atm----(ATM cloud)------frame relay------(CE2)2811
I want to bridge traffic between Ethernet interface to ATM interface on PE Router Cisco7200 with L2VPN Interworking.I used the IP mode interworking, VC is UP, I'm trying to ping from 7600 to 2811,it can't work.I want to know why? if you have any other suggestion to make the L2VPN Interworking configuration on 7600 to 2811 , please advise.
Thanks in advance

Hi mate,
I think you need to configure Frame-Relay to ATM service interworking between PE2 & CE2.
Kindly refer below given link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps1893/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800f375b.html#1010548
Regards
Ritesh

Similar Messages

IOS L2VPN Interworking on Cisco7200 (NPE200)

Dear All,
I have a Cisco 7204VXR Router with Network Processing Engine 200. I want to upgrade its IOS support to L2VPN Interworking image. I recently downloaded the IOS 12.0(33)S after I uploaded the IOS the router said that the IOS is not supported on NPE 200. Could you give me some specific advise on what kind of IOS and feature sets should I use for this to work.
Thank you in advance.

Hi
try 12.4 15T1. advanced enterprise services
regards
Aasheesh Gupta

L2vpn interworking options for Local Switching

Hi All
theres not much offered by cisco for interworking local attachment circuits for atom l2vpn. ive looked it up, but im specifically wondering about the FR-ethernet/vlan or PPP-ethernet/vlan couldnt find any references for those. are these possible locally on the same router. what are the supported platforms.
Thank you
-Glen

Hello Glen,
here's some documentation about local switching:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sb/feature/guide/28sblcl.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/fslocal.html
Hope that helps.
Antonio

FrameMaker 8 and WWP 2003 interworking problems

Hello all,
we have previously been using FM6 in conjunction with WWP2003 to produce HTML output. Due to new requirements we are facing the update to FM8 and encounter problems. Evidently FM files cannot be used at all to produce HTML output in WWP and if we import MIF files instead, then output is generated but many special characters are missing.
Is this a known problem, or are there perhaps updates available for WWP (I have not found any)? I think that moving to WWeP will not be an option. Any comments would be helpful because we have to determin whether the current workflow is possible at all under FM8.

Robert,
You might have better luck asking at the WWP users list over on Yahoo - http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/wwp-users/
My recommendation would be to dump WWP and go with mif2go.

MPLS L2VPN ASR9K and 7600

Am having problem bringing up mpls l2vpn between asr9k and 7609 router . Below is my config. The interfaces are up, the vc working, but can't ping across.
AS9K
interface GigabitEthernet0/2/0/6.609 l2transport
encapsulation dot1q 609
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
mtu 1526
pw-class TST
encapsulation mpls
   transport-mode vlan
xconnect group TST
p2p TST
   interface GigabitEthernet0/6.609
   neighbor 2.2.2.2 pw-id 609
    pw-class TST
7609
interface gig 3/4.609
encapsulation dot1q 609
xconnect 1.1.1.1 609 encapsulation mpls
***OUTPUT FROM ASR9K********
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0#sh l2vpn xconnect pw-class TST detail
Group X,X, state is up; Interworking none
AC: GigabitEthernet0/6.609, state is up
    Type VLAN; Num Ranges: 1
    VLAN ranges: [905, 905]
    MTU 1512; XC ID 0x1040003; interworking none
    Statistics:
      packets: received 735789487, sent 725878036
      bytes: received 405747931393, sent 184926449749
      drops: illegal VLAN 0, illegal length 0
PW: neighbor 2.2.2.2, PW ID 609, state is up ( established )
    PW class ENS, XC ID 0xc0000003
    Encapsulation MPLS, protocol LDP
    Source address 1.1.1.1
    PW type Ethernet VLAN, control word disabled, interworking none
    PW backup disable delay 0 sec
    Sequencing not set
    PW Status TLV in use
      MPLS         Local                          Remote
      Label        17442                          847
      Group ID     0x80003c0                      0x0
      Interface    GigabitEthernet0/6.609     uknown
      MTU          1512                           1512
      Control word disabled                       disabled
      PW type      Ethernet VLAN                  Ethernet VLAN
      VCCV CV type 0x2                            0x2
                   (LSP ping verification)        (LSP ping verification)
      VCCV CC type 0x6                            0x6
                   (router alert label)           (router alert label)
                   (TTL expiry)                   (TTL expiry)
    Incoming Status (PW Status TLV):
      Status code: 0x0 (Up) in Notification message
    Outgoing Status (PW Status TLV):
      Status code: 0x0 (Up) in Notification message
    MIB cpwVcIndex: 3221225475
    Statistics:
      packets: received 725878036, sent 735789487
      bytes: received 184926449749, sent 405747931393
*******7609 OUTPUT*******
Local interface: Gi1/3.609 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 609 up
Destination address: 1.1.1.1, VC ID: 609, VC status: up
    Output interface: Gi2/4, imposed label stack {0 151644}******************This is my problem no imposed label on 7609
    Preferred path: not configured
    Default path: active
    Next hop: 10.198.64.21
Create time: 00:00:16, last status change time: 00:00:16
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 1.1.1.1 up
    Targeted Hello: 2.2.2.2(LDP Id) -> 1.1.1.1, LDP is UP
    Status TLV support (local/remote)   : enabled/supported
      LDP route watch                   : enabled
      Label/status state machine        : established, LruRru
      Last local dataplane   status rcvd: No fault
      Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: No fault
      Last local SSS circuit status sent: No fault
      Last local LDP TLV    status sent: No fault
      Last remote LDP TLV    status rcvd: No fault
      Last remote LDP ADJ    status rcvd: No fault
    MPLS VC labels: local 505, remote 151644
    Group ID: local 0, remote 134218688
    MTU: local 1508, remote 1508
    Remote interface description: GigabitEthernet0_6_.609
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: Off (configured: autosense)
SSO Descriptor: 1.1.1.1/609, local label: 505
    SSM segment/switch IDs: 57633/24673 (used), PWID: 28772
VC statistics:
    transit packet totals: receive 3, send 0
    transit byte totals:   receive 216, send 0
    transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

Hello ogungbenro wale,
Would you be so kind to verify the output form 7600, since the config part does not correspond to VC you provided output for:
interface gig 3/4.609 <=
Local interface: Gi1/3.609 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 609 up <=

Layer 2 Interworking ETH/Vlan to FR

hi everyone,
i'm issuing a problem with the Layer 2 ETH/VLAN to Frame relay interwroking.
actually it works fine on the ETH/VLAN Side , the problem occure on the FR side where i notification msg while executing a CLI commande :
PEconfig)#connect fr_iw serial 7/0/23:0 200 l2transport
PE(config-fr-pw-switching)#xconnect 10.1.1.2 900 pw-class IW-FR-VLAN
Interworking specified in pw-class is not supported on this interface
i took a look on Google and Cisco but unfortunatly i didn't get any result ...
i guess its an restriction on the type of interface but a should confirm this with Experts like you
here's the output of the show interface s7/0/23:0
Serial7/0/23:0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Channelized E1T1 controller
MTU 1600 bytes, BW 34000 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, crc 16, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
LMI enq sent 6559, LMI stat recvd 6559, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up
LMI enq recvd 6560, LMI stat sent 6558, LMI upd sent 0, DCE LMI up
LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay NNI
Broadcast queue 0/256, broadcasts sent/dropped 0/0, interface broadcasts 0
Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:09, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 18:13:11
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Interface Serial7/0/23:0 queueing strategy: PXF Class-based
30 second input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
30 second output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
     13119 packets input, 188051 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 0 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     2 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 2 abort
     13117 packets output, 179201 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
     0 carrier transitions no alarm present
Timeslot(s) Used: 0-31, subrate: 2048Kb/s, transmit delay is 0 flags
non-inverted data
looking forward to hear you're analysis
and thanks in advance

here are the output requested :
show ver :
Cisco IOS Software, 10000 Software (C10K4-K91P11-M), Version 12.2(33)SB9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc5)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 18-Oct-10 19:33 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(20071113:194412) [shalpin-rom-1_2 101], DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE
PE uptime is 6 weeks, 2 days, 11 hours, 32 minutes
Uptime for this control processor is 6 weeks, 2 days, 10 hours, 58 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 01:34:37 UTC Tue Mar 22 2011
System restarted at 01:35:45 UTC Tue Mar 22 2011
System image file is "disk0:c10k4-k91p11-mz.122-33.SB9.bin"
Last reload type: Normal Reload
Last reload reason: Reload command
This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
[email protected].
Cisco C10008 (PRE4-RP) processor (revision V02 ) with 2588671K/163839K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID NWG133401J0
SB-1 CPU at 800Mhz, Implementation 0x410, Rev 5.0, 512KB L2 Cache
Backplane version 1.0, 8 slot
Last reset from software reset
PXF processor tmc0 is running.
PXF processor tmc1 is running.
PXF processor tmc2 is running.
PXF processor tmc3 is running.
1 FastEthernet interface
5 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
101 Serial interfaces
48 Channelized E1 ports
16 Subrate T3/E3 ports
7039K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
125440K bytes of ATA compact flash in bootflash (Sector size 512 bytes).
500472K bytes of ATA compact flash in disk0 (Sector size 512 bytes).
Standby is up
Standby has 2752512K bytes of memory
Configuration register is 0x102
for the show inventory i can't unfortunatly provide it because of some restriction on the ACS ...

L2VPN between ASR9000 and ME3800x

Hi,
I'm trying to set up a L2VPN(Vlan Mode) between a trunk port on an ASR9000, and an ME3800x.
The ASR is set up with an EFP:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/19.912 l2transport
encapsulation dot1q 912
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
mtu 1618
l2vpn
pw-class VlanMode
encapsulation mpls
transport-mode vlan
xconnect group orkide
    p2p OrkideSurnadal
    interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/19.912
    neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.75 pw-id 912
     pw-class VlanMode
On the other side I have terminated the xconnect on an ME3800x:
interface Vlan912
   mtu 1600
   no ip address
   xconnect xxx.xxx.xxx.82 912 encapsulation mpls
end
The VC is UP:
Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID      Status
Vl912          Eth VLAN 912               xxx.xxx.xxx.82    912        UP
Is this the correct way to to do this?
I can't get this to work like it should. If I should do this with switches, I would just configure a vlan from end-to-end.
Thanks in advance,
Jan Ove Greger

Hi,
I'm sorry for the confusion, but there is an MPLS network between them.
I tried using VC5/Ethernet mode, and the xconnect is UP again:
Group orkide, XC OrkideSurnadal, state is up; Interworking none
AC: GigabitEthernet0/0/0/19.912, state is up
Type VLAN; Num Ranges: 1
VLAN ranges: [912, 912]
MTU 1600; XC ID 0x40011; interworking none
Statistics:
packets: received 134, sent 12
bytes: received 9112, sent 816
drops: illegal VLAN 0, illegal length 0
PW: neighbor 85.93.224.75, PW ID 912, state is up ( established )
PW class not set, XC ID 0x40011
Encapsulation MPLS, protocol LDP
PW type Ethernet, control word disabled, interworking none
PW backup disable delay 0 sec
Sequencing not set
MPLS         Local                          Remote
Label        16003                          20
Group ID     0x5c0                          0x0
Interface    GigabitEthernet0/0/0/19.912    unknown
MTU          1600                           1600
Control word disabled                       disabled
PW type      Ethernet                       Ethernet
VCCV CV type 0x2                            0x2
(LSP ping verification)        (LSP ping verification)
VCCV CC type 0x6                            0x2
(router alert label)           (router alert label)
(TTL expiry)
MIB cpwVcIndex: 0
Create time: 30/01/2012 19:52:07 (00:04:34 ago)
Last time status changed: 30/01/2012 19:52:07 (00:04:34 ago)
Statistics:
packets: received 12, sent 134
bytes: received 816, sent 9112
But still no connection or mac-adresses on vlan 912 on the trunk of the ME3800x.
For testing we have setup a network 10.33.33.1/24 on vlan 912 of the AC on the ASR. On the trunk port of the ME3800x we have a 3560 where we also have configured 10.33.33.10/24 on vlan 912.
So they should be able to see each other, but they don't...
Regards,
JoG

VPLS BGP signaling configuration for L2VPN Inter-AS Option A

Hi All,
does someone confirm with me for VPLS BGP Signaling feature is available on Cisco ASR 9K XR version right now ? or coming soon ?
if not, did someone have a fully configuration example ( from end to end, and including MPLS setup ) under IOS version for L2VPN Inter-AS Option A?
it would be much appreciated if you could share with me !
Eric

hello belalcciejo,
has your problem been resolved already ? since I am starting work on same setup right now. could you mind share your Cisco end configuration to me without your confidential information?
thanks, please let me know if possible.
Eric

Problems with calls after VCS 8.22 upgrade

I've recently upgraded one of my VCS devices to 8.2.2, but I'm having some problems.
Setup is as follows:
VCS-C-1: X8.2.2
VCS-E: 7.2
VCS-C-2: 7.2
EX90s: 7.2
EX90 > VCS-C-1 (8.2.2) > Neighbour Zone > VCS-E (7.2) > Traversal Zone > VCS-C-2 (7.2)
Call is SIP the whole way.
Calls fail in either direction (connects but not audio or video). Was working fine before upgrading VCS-C-1 from 7.2 to 8.2.2.
If I change the neighbour zone from VCS-C-1 to the VCS-E to use a "Custom" profile with "Duo Video Filter" set to "On", it works fine, although that way I can't use presentation properly. Likewise if I introduce interworking into any part of the call path (force one leg to H323) it works, but again, interworking has its own set of other issues. Lastly, if I register either endpoint to the VCS-E, everything works, it just won't work when going through all three call hops.
The VCS-E is controlled by me so can be upgraded if required, however VCS-C-2 is in another organisation so upgrading that one is likely to be much more difficult.
I know there were changes to how Duo Video works in X8 - I notice it's moved from a global SIP command to per-zone, I imagine this has something to do with it.
Any ideas?

Update on this:
Upgraded the VCS-E, no change (again, I can't upgrade VCS-C number 2).
I've tested with E20s and SIP from a TS server - both work fine, it's only TC endpoints that seem to have the problem.
I've experimented with different call paths (we've got quite a few VCSs, a mix of X7 and X8) - in each case, it seems it matters what version the unit is registered to. As long as the EX90 is registered to a X7 VCS, it works fine, you can have as many X8s with neighbour and/or traversal zones as you want. As soon as it registers to an X8 VCS, the problem occurs.
Lastly, I see that the non-working call is establishing as AES-128, whereas before the upgrade encryption was turned off.

L2VPN - Ping Issue

Hi,
I have a MPLS setup as below and am trying to establish a L2VPN.
PE1-P-P-PE2
(IS-IS is the IGP)
As far as I understand the loopbacks (of the PE's) should be reachable thru the IGP for the L2VPN to work.
I have noticed a strange behavior. From PE1 I cannot ping the loopback of PE2. Although from PE2 I can ping PE1's loopback. I can see the Loopbacks in the routing table thru the IGP in both PE1 and PE2.
Now if I run an extended ping with record option the ping is successful.
Any one here has come across this sort of a problem.
Thanks
Imran.

Imran,
Try pinging from PE2 to P1 interface that connects to PE1. This will probably work. Then try pinging from PE2 PE1s interface that connects to P1 this will probably not work. Do the same ping that doesnt work and go onto PE1 and do debug ip packet (be careful - I hope this isnt a production network). When you do this debug look for the good old "encapsulation failed" messages. If you see these upgrade your code and you will be fine. I believe 28S is available and 30S is out soon.

L2VPN Pseudowire Redundancy arquitecture

Hi,
I'm trying to configure L2VPN Pseudowire Redundancy. I've found some documentation in the link below:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/fspseudo.html
But my scenario is quite different from the one explained at this document. I have the following scenario:
So I need to create a L2VPN between CE-A and CE-B. I need to establish the main xconnect between PE-A1 and PE-B1, and the backup between PE-A2 and PE-B2, and I would like the CE to be able to switch between one circuit or the other automatically.
How can I do it? Anybody can help me, please??
Regards,
Cristina

What I need is a layer 2 vpn over the MPLS, so configuring layer 3 routing protocol is not suitable for me.
Maybe it is important to say that I am the SP, so I manage either PE and CE equipment.
Actually, I've read that QinQ can solve my problem, but I'm trying implementing QinQ in this way and it doesn't have the behaviour I expect:
CE-A:
interface GigabitEthernet1/19
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300-301
switchport mode trunk
end
interface GigabitEthernet1/20
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300-301
switchport mode trunk
end
PE-A1:
pseudowire-class TEST-L2VPN-REDUN1
encapsulation mpls
preferred-path interface Tunnel11 disable-fallback    (Tunnel11 is a tunnel to PE-B1)
interface GigabitEthernet2/15
description test l2vpn redundancy
switchport
switchport access vlan 500
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
speed 1000
l2protocol-tunnel cdp
l2protocol-tunnel vtp
no cdp enable
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
interface Vlan500
description l2vpn redundancy
no ip address
xconnect 1.1.1.1 101 pw-class TEST-L2VPN-REDUN1   (1.1.1.1 is PE-B1 RouterID)
PE-A2:
pseudowire-class TEST-L2VPN-REDUN2
encapsulation mpls
preferred-path interface Tunnel12 disable-fallback    (Tunnel12 is a tunnel to PE-B2)
interface GigabitEthernet2/15
description test l2vpn redundancy
switchport
switchport access vlan 500
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
speed 1000
l2protocol-tunnel cdp
l2protocol-tunnel vtp
no cdp enable
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
interface Vlan500
description l2vpn redundancy
no ip address
xconnect 2.2.2.2 102 pw-class TEST-L2VPN-REDUN1   (2.2.2.2 is PE-B2 RouterID)
CE-B:
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300-301
switchport mode trunk
end
interface GigabitEthernet1/2
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300-301
switchport mode trunk
end
PE-B1:
pseudowire-class TEST-L2VPN-REDUN1
encapsulation mpls
preferred-path interface Tunnel13 disable-fallback    (Tunnel13 is a tunnel to PE-A1)
interface GigabitEthernet2/15
description prova l2vpn redundancy
switchport
switchport access vlan 500
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
speed 1000
l2protocol-tunnel cdp
l2protocol-tunnel vtp
no cdp enable
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
interface Vlan500
description l2vpn redundancy
no ip address
xconnect 3.3.3.3 101 pw-class TEST-L2VPN-REDUN1     (3.3.3.3 is PE-A1 routerID)
PE-A2:
pseudowire-class TEST-L2VPN-REDUN2
encapsulation mpls
preferred-path interface Tunnel14 disable-fallback    (Tunnel14 is a tunnel to PE-A2)
interface GigabitEthernet2/15
description prova l2vpn redundancy
switchport
switchport access vlan 500
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
speed 1000
l2protocol-tunnel cdp
l2protocol-tunnel vtp
no cdp enable
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
interface Vlan500
description l2vpn redundancy
no ip address
xconnect 4.4.4.4 102 pw-class TEST-L2VPN-REDUN2    (4.4.4.4 is PE-A2 routerID)
The result of applying this configuration is VC 101 established and with layer 2 connectivity ok, but VC 102 down and interface Gi2/15 of PE-A2 in err-disable state. The behaviour I expected is that STP protocol acts and put the the ports of the second layer 2 paths in blocking state.
Any idea??
Thanks.

L2vpn MTU

Hi,
I have read somewhere in this forum saying that the 1524 mtu size is a recommendation in an MPLS VPN context but it might not suit a l2vpn deployment. This is because l2vpn such as AToM need mpls mtu 1526 , right?
The problem I am facing right now is, cisco IOS version 12.3.25(S8)in c7500 only allow mpls mtu 1524 configured (Fe interface)
Question is, will my EoMPLS works if our core routers using mtu 1524 as the EoMPLS need 1526

Also for reference here are some previous discussions on MPLS MTU issues and workarounds. Hope they would be helpful.
http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Service%20Providers&topic=MPLS&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40%40.1ddcab92
http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Service%20Providers&topic=MPLS&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40%40.1ddcb9cd
http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Service%20Providers&topic=MPLS&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40%40.1ddee90f/0#selected_message
HTH-Cheers,
Swaroop

Rerouting on error code Cause i = 0x80FF - Interworking error; unspecified

Hi,
I have a problem with my operator. It has a regional crash ant I received this error code
Cause i = 0x80FF - Interworking error; unspecified
I have BRI backup with an other operator but the call manager does not reroute the call.
I try to put the BRI in the same route group or in an another route group but in the same rout list.
*Feb 25 09:20:00.355: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x1A99
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
                Exclusive, Channel 31
        Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '565552838'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
        Called Party Number i = 0x80, '0615405708'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
*Feb 25 09:20:00.375: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x9A99
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
                Exclusive, Channel 31
*Feb 25 09:20:00.423: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: RX <- DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x9A99
        Cause i = 0x80FF - Interworking error; unspecified
*Feb 25 09:20:00.447: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x1A99
*Feb 25 09:20:00.455: ISDN Se0/0/1:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x9A99
I need help please.
Pierre

Here is a similar Thread...
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3927483#3927483
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/4004578#4004578
Use can use the work around,..,
Remove the BR1 from the route group, reset the Route lists and re-add the BR1 back and test again
Please rate all useful posts
"The essence of christianity is not the enthronement but the obliteration of self --William Barclay"

Can FRF.12 work with FR-ATM interworking?

When transport VoIP over a low speed link (64K). we found the voice quality be affect of data trasfered at same time. And the network used FR-ATM interworking, we found the problem was cause by serialization delay. Has any other solution than MLP reduce the packet size such as FRF.12?

So you have a VPN/MPLS and you intend to use FRF.12 between CE routers. The connections between PE and CE are ATM/FR Interworking.
This scheme wills not work because the fragments have to assembled in the PE routers. The link between PE and CE is an IP connection.
Any scheme of fragmentation has to be used between PE and CE routers; hence, you can use LFI between a connection Interworking FR/ATM.

Interworked, No permission, Insufficient privilege

When trying to establish a call from a Movi (Jabber) sip client to a Jabber video (sip) client at 199.19.190.30 I get an error stating "Interworked, No Permission, Insufficient privilege". The call should be sip to sip but is routed instead as sip - H323. The jabber.com VCS is then giving me the error message. This call is to a client in the United Kingdom. I can call another Jabber client in San Francisco with no problem. The Jabber user in the UK can call me no problem. For some reason the VCS-E in the UK must mis-configured.

rev 69 too
tomorrow I will have the webex and let you know
Something happenned after my customer change the suse's server IP, I had to perform a re-installation of SAP Business One only
We were supposed to install using the hostname but no one of the installers let me use the hostname
so it Kind of forced me to use the IP.
After asking Support about that one of the specialists told me that he prefers to use IP instead of the hostname. So I used IP.
Maybe this changed something I cannot detect yet. but tomorrow we'll see.
KR

L2VPN Interworking Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for