L520 - HM65 Intel Chipset support SATA3?

Hi there, can anyone tell me if L520 (7859-58G) supports SATA3?
Thanks

hey ivanpagac,
the L520 is up to SATA2 as per the following document : http://www.lenovo.com/psref/pdf/tabook.pdf
WW Social Media
Important Note: If you need help, post your question in the forum, and include your system type, model number and OS. Do not post your serial number.
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!
Have you checked out the Community Knowledgebase yet?!
How to send a private message? --> Check out this article.

Similar Messages

Intel Chipset Support for Windows 7 fails to install

When I tried to manually install Intel Chipset Support for Windows 7, Vista and XP (oss907ww, Version: 9.1.1.1016, Release Date: 2009/10/02, http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?sitestyle=lenovo&lndocid=MIGR-73684) on my W700 with Windows 7 x64, I got the following error message:
"This computer does not meet the minimum requirements for installing the software. Setup will now exit."
The newly released System Update 4.0 also fails to install this version of Intel Chipset Support. However, the previous version, Intel Chipset Support for Windows Vista, XP and 2000 (oss803ww, Version: 8.7.0.1007, Release Date: 2008/08/20, http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?sitestyle=lenovo&lndocid=MIGR-70315) installs and works fine on my current system. Has anyone else had this problem?

Hi,
I have a problem installing the above mentioned chipset driver for win7. TVSU can't install it, and when I do it manually, it gives me a message saying (translated - original message was annoyingly in chinese) "This system does not meet the lowest requirements of the software. The installation will end now."
I tried downloading it from lenovo's website, but it didn't work either, giving me the same message. The version of this driver is 9.1.1.1016 (according to TVSU).
Anyone have any ideas on what on earth is wrong?
Thank you all!
Cassio
Moderator note; subject edited to match thread
T400s - 2815RW1 + Win7 Ultimate
Don't pm me for help! That's what the forum is for. Also, Google's nicer than me. Ask him.

Update Retriever fails to download Intel Chipset Support update

When I ran Update Retriever (version 4.03.0006) on my R500 that is running Windows XP/SP3, and specify machine type = 2714, and operating system = Windows XP and language = English, in the search criteria, I am presented with the following available package:
Intel Chipset Support for Widows 2000/XP/Vista/7/8
It is interesting to note that Update Retriever says that no previous version of this driver exists, yet version 9.3.0.1020 of this driver is installed on that machine.
I selected the package and the download appeared to proceed, but at the end, I was informed that “1 update failed to be downloaded.” Selecting that link displays a box with the following information:
The following updates fail to be downloaded
Title                                                                                       Version       Name
Intel Chipset Support for Widows 2000/XP/Vista/7/8   9.3.0.1021 CHIPSET_G1IC
When I then selected the “View history” option followed by selecting the link to “View download history”, I am informed that the following updates were downloaded successfully
Title                       Version        Name
CHIPSET_G1IC   9.3.0.1021   Intel Chipset Support for Widows 2000/XP/Vista/7/8
If I now select “Manage Repository”, and select “Update view”, the package is not visible. It is also not visible if I browse the repository directly. This package is not presented to me when I run Thinkvantage System Update.
This also happened when I ran Update Retriever (version 4.03.0006) on my R61 that is running Windows XP/SP3, and specified machine type = 8932, and operating system = Windows XP and language = English, in the search criteria.
Please fix. Thanks.
ThinkPad R61 8932-CTO T8300 2.40 Ghz 3GB RAM Win XP
ThinkPad R500 2714-CTO P8600 2.40 Ghz 3GB RAM Win XP; Two ThinkPad R500's 2714-CTO T9600 2.80 Ghz 4GB RAM Win 7
ThinkPad T500 2241-DB9 T9600 2.80 Ghz 4GB RAM Win 7
ThinkCenter A63 5237-CTO 3GB Ram Win XP; A21m and a pair of 380XD's

Ever since I reported this problem, I have logged on almost every day and again tried to download this update using Update Retriever. Today, I am happy to say, the download was successful on both my R61 as well as my R500 machines. So thank-you Lenovo. The problem is resolved.
It is interesting to note, that after downloading the package, I then tried System Update and was surprised to note that the recently downloaded package was not presented to me as available for update. So back to Update Retriever to modify the status of the package from TEST to ACTIVE. Then back to System Update. No change. The package was still not available for update. If anybody has any ideas on why this is happening, I would appreciate their input. Maybe I will open a new post to help find a solution.
ThinkPad R61 8932-CTO T8300 2.40 Ghz 3GB RAM Win XP
ThinkPad R500 2714-CTO P8600 2.40 Ghz 3GB RAM Win XP; Two ThinkPad R500's 2714-CTO T9600 2.80 Ghz 4GB RAM Win 7
ThinkPad T500 2241-DB9 T9600 2.80 Ghz 4GB RAM Win 7
ThinkCenter A63 5237-CTO 3GB Ram Win XP; A21m and a pair of 380XD's

New Intel Chipset and SATA3 mSATA SSDs

Since the 4th generation Intel processors are coming, that means they'll probably support the 4th generation chipsets, QM87 in particular for us.
Since the QM87 chipset supports four SATA3 lanes, I hope this means I'll be able to run an mSATA SSD at SATA3 speeds instead of SATA2.
The speed differences are negligible for humans, but it would be nice to get what I paid for.

There are existing systems with 6 Gbps mSATA ports. The port in the W530 is only 3 Gbps because there is a limit of two 6 Gbps SATA lanes in the QM77 chipset, and Lenovo thought they would be better used for the 2.5" bay and the Ultrabay. Adding more 6 Gbps SATA lanes allows for the mSATA port in the existing design to use 6 Gbps SATA.
NGFF/M.2 supports SATA Express (12 Gbps) as well as 6 Gbps SATA, but will of course require an additional port in the notebook due to the different form factor.
Thinkpad W530, i7-3720QM, 1920x1080 screen, 32GB RAM, dual SSDs (Samsung 830, Crucial M4 mSATA), Quadro K2000M, 9-cell battery, DVD burner, backlit keyboard, Bluetooth, Intel 6300 wireless card

Intel Chipset Support Did Not Download

Am running TVSU version 5 on a T410. When updating, it tells me that there's an Intel chipset update available. The download starts, then ends with a Status message "Did not download." The Intel Chipset update version in question is 9.3.0.1021.
Any help would be appreciated.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

here you go: http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=DS014952
it looks like the only change from the prior version is Win8 support.
hope this helps.
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество
Community Resources: Participation Rules • Images in posts • Search (Advanced) • Private Messaging
PM requests for individual support are not answered. If a post solves your issue, please mark it so.
X1C3 Helix X220 X301 X200T T61p T60p Y3P • T520 T420 T510 T400 R400 T61 Y2P Y13
I am not a Lenovo employee.

Which intel chipset support solaris 10 where can i find information

Guys i am new to solaris please help me where can i find full information, is Intel DG30 series with core2dual supports solaris10.

http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/

Missing OS for Intel Chipset in driver Matrices of nearly all ThinkPads

Missing OS for Intel Chipset in driver Matrices of nearly all ThinkPads:
Windows Vista, 7 and 8 are not mentioned in the 2nd column
Example:
R400
T410s
R60
Intel Chipset Support for Windows 8 (32-bit, 64-bit), 7 (32-bit, 64-bit), Vista (32-bit, 64-bit), XP (32-bit, 64-bit) - ThinkPad ... Learn more
Version
: 9.3.0.1021
Intel Chipset Support (WW)
Read me
Windows XP 32bit
Windows XP x64
19 Oct 2012
My home-forum: http://www.thinkpad-forum.de
Wiki: Deutsches ThinkPad-Wiki English ThinkWiki
My ThinkPad-Collection
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Mornsgrans,
We will look into this, you are right, the 2nd column and the OS information in the driver page itself doesn't match.
We will fix it and let you know once this is done.
Thank you for your patience.
Thank you.
Regards,
stormycloud

Does Intel GM45 Express Chipset support DirectX11 with Win 7

will Mobile Intel GM45 Express Chipset support DirectX new version 11 for Windows 7 ?
thnx,

Hi
I found this Intel page and there you can find this info:
the highest level of Microsoft Windows Aero experience with enabled DX 10 support
http://www.intel.com/products/notebook/chipsets/gm45/gm45-overview.htm
It seems that this chipset supports DirectX 10 and lower.
PS: The DirectX 11 is available in Win 7 but its matter of graphic card if DirectX11 would be supported

Intel P55 chipsets support

Are Intel P55 chipsets supported by OVM 2.2.1 or planned for OVM 3.0?

I agree with Avi... looks like you are planning to setup a new system to run Oracle VM on.
One thing to keep in mind, not sure if you plan to use it in a server environment or a home setup, if you do it for your own learning on a consumer system you have to keep in mind that Oracle VM is build for server systems and not all is working out of the box on a consumer system. For example SATA disks might not work. You will need to be able to run AHCI on your board to get Oracle VM to reconize your sata disks.
So if you run into this issue please do check this blogpost I have written down when I created my last test server at home with SATA disks: http://johanlouwers.blogspot.com/2010/10/oracle-vm-and-sata.html
Might be solved in the next release however not sure when it will be available to the world.
regards,
Johan Louwers.

Can I run adobe master collection in a windows partition on a basic mbp 13" with only the intel chipset?

can I run adobe master collection in a windows partition on a basic mbp 13" with only the intel chipset?
I want to install 16 gb ram but I don't think I can change the lack of video card. I wanted this basic machine because it has fairly long battery life. I don't need or want retina at this time. My model is the mid 2012 model. I am running the adobe collection for mac, I want to run the windows versions. Is it possible? What is the most ram I could access using something like fusion 5, assuming I could get fusion 5 to work? would it refuse to run because of the intel chipset and lack of video card?
If I'm wrong and there is a way to add a video card to this model, could some version of fusion and windows 7 access more than 2 gb operating ram?
What cost would I be incurring, and would it be cheaper to buy a windows laptop with more ram than I could access via a virtual machine?
I want to work on a client's work in the windows versions of the creative suite, with occasional usage of after effects for windows, and to use some web plug-ins only available in windows versions, and to try some windows-only video and audio software.
thanks for any suggestions. While many people have told me I can run everything on my macbook, I am concerned about what I think is a limited amount of ram that can be accessed over the virtual machine partition softwares, and I don't know if what I want to attempt is actually possible.
My mbp os is 10.8.2 on a 2.5 GHz intel core i5 4 gb 1600MHz DDR3 with 500 hard drive. the basic 13" mid 2012 machine.
I'm hoping to install 16 G of opertating ram to allow more adobe programs to run concurrently- just when I am working on the mac side.
also, off track but, for years I have wanted a small machine that is more easily portable than my 15" machines. I have only had this used machine for a few weeks, but already I have been very satisfied and used it for presentations at clients. I don't want an air because I really want the dvd burner and player. No matter what apple says about wireless, there are decades of legacy work stored on optical discs all over the world, and I don't want to be unable to open something at a client's office because I don't have a dvd drive. Additionally, I have very large files I want to transfer via ethernet or firewire so that the transfer will take less time and be more secure than wifi. I resist apple's trend to make every machine a disposable toy that is viable only a year or so. I have read reviews that label the mbp it a poor value compared to the air. If all you need to do is text and communicate via wifi, many devices will sufice, and an air is certainly the most elegant. But what about the cost of large ssd's and protecting the drive against damage from shock? I want to be able to move this thing around and the small size is much safer inside my padded bag when I sit in narrow airplane seats, crowded trains and other congested spaces. I am much more likely to be able to borrow a large screen in a client's office ( with the use of one of the three adapters I had to buy) than to be able to borrow a dvd drive that has drivers for mac os 10.8.2. I suspect this may be the last generation of machines that have optical drives and ethernet, and that was why I purchased it so that I could continue to do work into the next few years. I am impressed by the retina display, but I need long battery life. And as beautiful as the retina display is, it is even more of a problem when trying to cross platform with the windows world. I wish I could infuence apple to do a trial product flow for a machine designed to work with 80% of the business world that uses windows. How spectacular that would be. With all their expertise and adept hardware design, to create a machine that cross platforms better than a windows machine itself works? Now that would be an accomplishment. Instead of 8 or 9 percent of the total computer sales, why not aim for a higher percentage? Smart devices will keep moving toward portable computers in power, anyway.

confused, bothered and bewildered wrote:
can I run adobe master collection in a windows partition on a basic mbp 13" with only the intel chipset?
I want to install 16 gb ram but I don't think I can change the lack of video card. I wanted this basic machine because it has fairly long battery life. I don't need or want retina at this time. My model is the mid 2012 model. I am running the adobe collection for mac, I want to run the windows versions. Is it possible? What is the most ram I could access using something like fusion 5, assuming I could get fusion 5 to work? would it refuse to run because of the intel chipset and lack of video card?
If I'm wrong and there is a way to add a video card to this model, could some version of fusion and windows 7 access more than 2 gb operating ram?
What cost would I be incurring, and would it be cheaper to buy a windows laptop with more ram than I could access via a virtual machine?...
Fusion should work on your machine and if you put 16 GB of RAM in (see http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Apple_MacBook_MacBook_Pro/Upgrade/DDR3_160 0MHz_SDRAM), Fusion can access a good portion of that. Also, in a Virtual Machine, the guest OS is presented with Fusion's video card emulation, not what's in hardware on your Mac. Of course, finding Windows 7 now that Win 8 has been released could take some doing and the Win 8 Pro upgrade price is supposed to jump to $200 the end of the month. Add that to the price of Fusion and the extra RAM and you're beginning to get into the realm of low end real PC's.
As to cross platform, I assume you're aware of BootCamp (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1461).

M93p SFF "missing driver" for &DEV_8C24&SUBSYS_309717AA; needed Intel chipset utility 10.0.24

A new M93p SFF machine arrived Thursday, which I'm preparing for shipment to a friend in Virginia whose current 7-year old desktop machine has finally reached its own end-of-life. Win7 Pro x64 pre-installed (via downgrade rights from Win8.1).
I've bought four M93p machines now (one tower and three SFF) and they've all been standard CPU... i5-4570. This time I thought I'd spend the extra $30 and go for one step up, to the i5-4670. Cheap enough. Aside from the Win7 downgrade the rest of the machine is standard.
And then I do my own "after market hardware upgrade", purchasing my own parts: adding another 4GB of memory from Crucial, adding a 256GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD, and adding a low-profile 1GB DDR5 Sapphire R7 250 video card. The existing two pre-installed Win7 boot partitions were easily migrated over to the SSD from the stock 500GB SATA spinner, and the original 500GB spinner was then fully repurposed to be a second "data" drive. All went without a hitch... almost.
In the process of doing Windows Updates, driver updates, Lenovo/Norton bloatware removal, Lenovo software updates, etc., I noticed that there was a device showing a yellow exclamation mark in Device Manager. This was of course totally unexpected, and I was very curious as to its cause. Was it due to the i5-4670 CPU? Was it due to a BIOS update which now made use of a hardware feature that had previously been disabled? Didn't know.
The device was "PCI Data Acquisition and Signal Processing Controller". And its Hardware ID is PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_8C24&SUBSYS_309717AA. The mystery was why this didn't have a suitable Lenovo-provided driver specifically available on the download site for the M93p. And if it was actually an Intel hardware item and should have been supported by the Intel Chipset Utility (latest version for Haswell from Lenovo being 10.0.13), why did it not have the proper driver? And why didn't "update driver automatically" through Windows Update not find the proper driver on the MS Update Catalog site?
All very interesting.
Well, turns out support for this device is related to Intel Dynamic Platform and Thermal Framework Driver. And it turns out that it IS actually supported by the latest Chipset Utility from Intel (v10.0.24), available directly from the Intel download center. Unfortunately it is NOT present in the older 10.0.13 available from Lenovo on their own download site for the M93p drivers and software.
Once that most current 10.0.24 version of the Intel Chipset Utility was run, now sure enough the device is now correctly supported by its driver and no longer appears as "other" with a yellow exclamation mark. Instead, it now appears properly labeled as "Intel(R) 8 Series/C220 Series Thermal - 8C24".
So, problem now resolved. No more "other" unknown device with yellow exclamation mark.
But the question still remains as to what has only newly triggered this in my brand new just manufactured (10A9CT01WW, with its special order i5-4670 CPU instead of standard i5-4570) and delivered Lenovo-provided M93p? How is it that Lenovo didn't observe this? Is it something new from Intel now present in the Q87 chipset used on the motherboard? Why didn't it appear in any of the other three M93p machines I've purchased over the past year?
If it was tied to the i5-4670 CPU, you'd still think Lenovo would have noticed this issue before now.
Anyway, for anybody else who comes along behind me and has this same hardware problem, the solution is easy: just grab at least the latest 10.0.24 Chipset Utility from Intel. Until Lenovo updates things, this appears to be the fix.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Today's followup...
Lenovo tech showed up as scheduled, although I was baffled because yesterday I was told the replacement board was "back ordered" and still in China (or maybe on a boat in a container, waiting to be unloaded). With the longshoreman's problem on the west coast and specifically affecting the Port of LA, it's not clear when items shipped this way will arrive.
Anyway, today I get a phone call that the tech is 30 minutes out! Great, although I'm baffled as to how he has a motherboard today if yesterday it was supposed "back ordered". Also, he does have the replacement case front fan, in the event it wasn't the original motherboard sensor which that was responsible for the reporting the "system fan" as "not operating" even though it was plugged into the fan header on the motherboard and was spinning properly.
Well, turns out the system board he arrived with was NOT the same 00K277 board delivered from the factory in my M93p as it arrived last Thursday. Instead, it was a presumably acceptable substitute 3T7183 board. And in fact, once installed it DID work.
However... still "not operating" for the front case fan. Disappointing.
Also, the "motherboard temp" of 212F degrees now was no longer even presented at all! It simply was not reported by the sensor to the software. This actually agrees with another M93p, which also fails to report "motherboard temp", while yet another M93p reports it as 72F degrees (instead of the 212F degrees from my original Thursday board). So maybe this particular issue should just be entirely forgotten about, although it certainly doesn't seem at all correct.
Next step, try to replace the case fan. With "not operating" from two boards (and thus two fan headers), it obviously would seem to be the fan itself that's probably responsible.
Well, unfortunately they sent the wrong fan part. It's cable was 4-wire (i.e. PWM?) rather than 3-wire of the original. also the 4-wire cable on the new fan was far too short to be able to reach over to the fan header connector on the motherboard. It's quite simply the wrong fan part.
So, the tech re-ordered the correct replacement fan. Presumably when available I'll get another call and another tech will come out to swap it. Hopefully that will finally resolve the "not operating" system fan issue and I will finally see its RPM.
Bottom line: today's service call accomplished nothing productive. The new board did no harm but it also did no good. And the new fan was unusable, since it was the wrong fan part.
I await the next visit.

Installing OSX 10.4 on intel chipsets

I'm thinking about building a desktop and I was wondering if anyone knows any type of way to install Mac OS X 10.4 on it. I figured now that Apple's been using intel chipsets it wouldn't be too hard would it? Has anyone tried to do it or knows ways to do it? Is it as simple as installing it on a regular intel chipset mac?

Attempting to install it on anything else is a violation of the license agreement, as well as impossible.
Nonsense! All you have to do is get a motherboard with an Intel chipset that supports OS X. Since the only source for these is Apple, & the only way they will sell you one is in a Mac that comes with a license to use the OS, just buy a Mac, pull out the motherboard, mount it in the PC enclosure of your choice, & you are good to go.
What? You say that would cost more than a Mac & involve pointless extra work? Picky, picky, picky!

Mobile intel chipset

mobile intel chipset R on a presario cq62-411nr, the audio and video is not in sync and making popping and cracking noise.

Your support page is here:
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/product?product=5052034&lc=en&cc=us&dlc=en&task=
******Clicking the Thumbs-Up button is a way to say -Thanks!.******
**Click Accept as Solution on a Reply that solves your issue to help others**

Using Media player with Intel chipsets...

Does anyone know of a download that would allow me to use WMP with with an Intel chipset?

VLC and MPlayer both will support WMV on Intel, but i don't think they support WMV3 yet (thats the one made by WMP9), they both support WMV3 on intel Linux and they are working to port it to OS X (i don't think its working yet, but i could be wrong)

845 EMax Series - Intel Chipset

I have recently purchased and installed a 845 EMax w/Intel Chipset. Installation is more or less complete, however, in Device Manager, I have the big yellow (?) question mark for the PCI Universal Serial Bus. The OS is Win98SE. I have searched for a driver for this on both the driver disk provided as well as the W98 disk, but to no avail. I would appreciate any light someone could shed on this problem.

Seems you have not installed the USB 2.0 drivers yet?
If you haven't, download and install these:
http://download.msi.com.tw/support/dvr_exe/intelusb47.exe
Win98 does not natively support the 845E chipset. Also, make sure you install the chipset drivers, here:
http://download.msi.com.tw/support/dvr_exe/inf48.exe

L520 - HM65 Intel Chipset support SATA3?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for