LabView DSC + OPC Servers + Windows 2003 server

I just want to suggest this guide from Matrikon to the ones that are going to deal with DSC labview modules, OPC servers and windows 2003 server (Win 2003 is not officially supported by NI).
Appling this configurations I solved some problems I was having with my application.
gianpiero

Here are the updated links:
pdf MatrikonOPC: DCOM for Windows 2000 and NT
pdf MatrikonOPC: DCOM for Windows XP SP1 and 2003 (base)
pdf MatrikonOPC: DCOM for Windows XP SP2 and 2003 SP1
Misha

Similar Messages

Running LabVIEW 7.1 on Windows 2003 Server with Terminal Services

We are setting up a newtork based solution with LabView. I have looked for documentation on installing LV 7.1 on a Windows 2003 server to run the applications and then have destkops connect to it. Can this be done with a Terminal Services Access solution? Another words, if we were to purchase the LV Volume License Manager, can you install LV 7.1 onto a Windows 2003 server and run the application through TS across a 1GB backbone from the desktop, which makes the server do all the processing?

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:42:13 -0500, ITIQ wrote:
> By running a session through Terminal Services you are NOT running
> anything on the desktop it all runs on the server. So if the software
> was installed on the server and you had the correct number of licenses
> that you allow to connect through Terminal Services, would this not be
> allowed under the EULA?
Sorry for the delay. I'm surprised Philip didn't get back to us... Phil
are you there? Based on his comments, I think he misunderstands your
situation (no offense Phil).
You and I are both talking about the same thing. You basically want a
terminal server license. NI will not provide it. They told me (over the
phone) to get a multi-seat license (MSL). IMO, that's unacceptable. I
expect a LV license taylored specifically for thin client networks. A
multi-seat license is for -->installing<-- on multiple machines. It
conforms to a totally different set of rules. One big one, an MSL assumes
that you intend to run LV locally to interact with DAQ hardware. Since
this won't be done with the thin client, you shouldn't have to pay for it.
> I am not sure if the question is if the license is valid or not, I am
> first just trying to figure out if you can even install LV on a Windows
> 2003 server and run it through a Terminal Services Session.
Since you are talking about a Microsoft operating system, I would say this
cannot be done without some additional/costly junk installed.
Here's another option. If the people you're supporting don't have any
platform dependent things like ActiveX in their LV applications, you
should consider using a Linux-based terminal server. I know for a fact it
works.
I've assisted in setting up a network like this before:
* One Linux terminal server with LabVIEW for Linux (Full Dev)
* One WinXP box on the network with LabVIEW for Win (Prof Dev)
* 5 cheap thin clients
They developed LabVIEW source code on the thin clients and then compiled
packages on the WinXP box for distribution to their customers. The WinXP
was only used for compiles so they just hopped on when necessary. The
eventual plan is for the thin clients to simply open a RemoteDesktop
(using RDP) terminal session and do the compiles from there. I'm not sure
how to do that yet... on the Windows side.
> I see the comments on calling VIs through LV. I am a Network Engineer
> not a LV Developer, so unfortunately I do not know what a VI is. All I
> am looking to do is run low end PCs with LV if I have to, but use the
> server as the workhorse to process all sims etc.
Phil must have thought you needed a LV application to access the front
panel controls of another LV application running on a remote machine. The
VI server is handy in that area but useless in your case.
Hey, you wanna hear about cheap network infrastructure? We bought our
thin client boxes for $15 each! Go to ltsp.org if you want more info on
configuring Linux as a terminal server.
You, and anyone else, can also email me at gnu_voodoo [at] netzero [dot]
com for questions/comments.

Installing problem on Windows 2003 Server 64 bit

Dear All,
I'am trying to install XE onto a Windows 2003 Server 64 bit.. The installation process ends without any errors but the database itself seems not to start.
I tried several hints that have been mentioned here within the forum. But none of them worked. While experimenting I saw that there is not a single registry entry of Oracle within HKEY_LOCAL_MASCHINE\Software .
Is there a possiblity to set those needed registry entries manually? Is there a script for that purpose?
Thank you very much for your help!
Regards
Matthias

Hi,
thank you for your reply. As 32bit programs should run under Windows 64bit I thought the XE should run under 64bit, too.
The installation of XE itself seems to finish without any errors. But within the log files it can be read that the database has not started up due to a out of memory problem. This causes many log entries within all other logfiles as no database could be created.
The out of memory problem might be the same as within Advice on running XE on a small virtual Linux host ("Virtuozzo") because I am using a virtual windows 2003 server with "Virtuozzo", too.
At this time I am on discussing the issue with the provider. Maybe I will get a dedicated server with Windows Server 2003 64bit. Hopefully the XE could be installed on the 64bit Windows Server because 32bit dedicated servers are rare.
Best regards
Matthias

Oracle HTTP Server download bandwidth limited on Windows 2003 Server

Hi,
we have an ApEx application with the following configuration on the server:
OS: Windows 2003 Server 64Bit
DB: 10.2.0.3 64bit
HTTP Server: the one that comes on the companion CD of Oracle DB 10g 32 bit
and after the bandwidth in the datacenter where the server resides was increased, I discovered a problem related to the server download bandwidth. I found on Metalink a Note [568075.1 - HTTP Server File Download Speed Is Slow |https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=568075.1] , but unfortunately not a very clear resolution given the fact that we use Oracle DB SEOne, so options 1 & 2 will involve additional licenses costs.
I tried option 3 suggested in the note by using the HTTP Server that comes with 11g (I assume this is a supported configuration also from licenses point of view HTTP Server from 11g on top of Oracle DB 10g) and I got a boost in performance but the bandwidth is still 70% compared to the bandwidth I get when downloading from the IIS on the same server.
Has anyone went through this exercise and found a solution for fully using the server bandwidth without needing to go for option 4 in the note, using Linux :), as in our case this will involve again additional licenses and/or hardware costs as the HTTP Server that comes with the DB has to be installed on the machine where the DB is installed?
Thanks in advance,
Florin

Ooops ... things like this happen with Oracle Support, no answer?
Can you tell me anyway the SR number or the SR title so that I can write it in the SR I make? Like that maybe Oracle Support will work harder on the case, as there are more customers hitting the same problem.
Anyway in the meanwhile, I run some tests with the original Apache and this one works like a charm even in Windows 2003 Server. What remains now to be done is to use the Open Source Apache as proxy to the HTTP Server, as it looks like it handles much better the static content, it supports also mod_gzip or mod_deflate, but does not support mod_plsql :(. So I think the combination of the two: will do the work for me, but it is really a pity that I have to configure 2 web servers because the HTTP Server has flaws in it :(. Hopefully these will be fixed soon

BOE XI R2 SP3 - Does it work on Windows 2003 Server SP2?

We are using BOE XI R2 SP3 (v. 11.5.9.1076) on Windows 2003 Server (32bit) Service Pack 1. Our company needs to upgrade all Windows 2003 Servers to Service Pack 2.
According to the documentation on the web, BOE XI R2 SP3 is supported on Win 2003 Svr SP1
(http://resources.businessobjects.com/support/communitycs/TechnicalPapers/boe_xi_r2_supported_platforms_windows_sp3.pdf)
However, I can't find any information on the BOE XI R2 SP3 version running on Win 2003 Svr SP2.
Could someone please let me know if there is such information (link to web site, etc), or if from own experience, this version of BOE XI works with W2003 SP2?
If this doesn't work, what should we do next? Should we upgrade BOE XI R2 to Service Pack 4, and then upgrade Win 2003 Server to SP2, or upgrade Win 2003 Server to SP2 and then upgrade BOE XI R2 to SP4?
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you so much.

Hi,
BOE XIR2 SP3 is supported on :
Supported Operating Systems
Desktop Products
u2022 Windows 2000 SP4 Professional
u2022 Windows XP SP2 Professional
u2022 Windows Vista (All 32-bit and 64-bit Editions)
u2022 Windows 2000 SP4 Advanced Server
u2022 Windows 2000 SP4 Datacenter Server
u2022 Windows 2000 SP4 Server
u2022 Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Datacenter Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Enterprise Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Standard Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Web Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 (x64 Edition) SP2
Server Products
u2022 Windows 2000 SP4 Advanced Server
u2022 Windows 2000 SP4 Datacenter Server
u2022 Windows 2000 SP4 Server
u2022 Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Datacenter Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Enterprise Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Standard Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Web Edition
u2022 Windows Server 2003 (x64 Edition) SP2
Hope this helps
Regards,
Shweta

Tomcat (3.2.8) service will not start in Windows 2003 Server

We just upgraded one of our servers to Windows 2003 Server. I did change the port in server.xml from 8080 to 8060. When I try to start the tomcat service it fails with an error message:
Could not start the Tomcat service on Local Computer.
Error 1067: The process terminated unexpectedly.
I can however start it with the startup.bat file in tomcat_home\bin
Can anyone help.. was running fine under windows 2000 server

Corection Tomcat version is 3.2.4

DPM 2012 R2 agent update on Windows 2003 server x64

Hi,
I have an old windows 2003 server x64 protected by DPM 2012 Sp1. After DPM upgrade to 2012 R2 I cannot update DPM Agent on server. If I try to update agent manually error message is : agentsetup.exe is not a valid win32 application.
Mihai

command back,
edit: it seems like a reboot is definitely needed to get it working
got it working like described here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2958100/en-us
Install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable on Windows Server 2003 servers if it is not already installed.
Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 SP1 Redistributable Package (x86)
Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable Package (x64)
Note The following error occurs if the C++ redistributable is not installed:
Data Protection Manager Setup
Could not load the setup launch screen. Please contact Microsoft Product Support.
Copy the Windows Server 2003 Agent installer that is located on in the DPM server to the Windows Server 2003 server, and then install the agent.
64-bit: <var>DPM Installation Location</var>\DPM\agents\RA\4.2.1226.0\amd64\1033\DPMAgentInstaller_Win2K3_AMD64.exe
32-bit: <var>DPM Installation Location</var>\DPM\agents\RA\4.2.1226.0\i386\1033\
DPMAgentInstaller_Win2K3_i386.exe
Run the following command at an administrative command prompt:
cd DPM Agent Installation Location\DPM\bin\setdpmserver.exe –dpmservername DPM Server Name
Run the following Windows Powershell cmdlet to establish a connection with the DPM server:
Attach-ProductionServer.ps1 DPMServerNameProductionServerNameUserNamePasswordDomain
regards
Stefan

How to setup SMBX client for work with Windows 2003 server's shared folders?

Dear community,
Some folders within shared folder on Windows 2003 Server is not visible for MacOS 10.8 client.
How should I set up SMBX? Is there manual?
I know, there is simple solution to type exact pathname (with those invisible folders) in connection dialog, but it is not usefull for me.
Thank you in advance

Hi,
Please remove the 3 non-exists DC from environment using the metadata clean-up process using script from below article. then manually delete the records from DNS management console as given below.
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/d31f091f-2642-4ede-9f97-0e1cc4d577f3
Manual steps to clear the records.
Dnsmgmt.msc [Dns Management]
A.Expand the forward lookup zones\_msdcs folder
i. Make sure only the actual domain controllers are listed, delete wrong Alias recordsremove wrong name server records
ii. Select the container [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\dc\_sites_\sitename\_tcp] > delete incorrect _ldap and _kerberos records are listed.
iii. Select the container [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\dc\_tcp] and delete incorrect _ldap and _kerberos records
iv. Expand the [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\domains\guid\_tcp] and delete incorrect _ldap entries
v. Select [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\gc] – delete incorrect HostA records
vi. Expand the [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\gc\_sites\sitename\_tcp] – delete incorrect _ldap entries
vii.Select the [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\gc\_tcp] – delete incorrect _ldap entries
viii. Select the [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\pdc\_tcp] – delete incorrect _ldap entries
B.Expand the forward lookup zones\domain.com folder
i.Delete Host(A) records of dc’s which are non-existant.
ii.Correct the NameServer (NS) records
iii. Follow steps similar to ’ A ii ‘ >> ‘ A viii’
· Dssite.msc [Sites and Services]
A.Expand the [Sites\Sitename\Servers] – delete incorrect server’s
B.Delete incorrect subnet configurations [Sites\Subnets]
C.Delete incorrect site links [Sites\IP]
· Make sure the domain controllers are pointing to the correct dns servers in tcp\ip settings.
· Force replication – ‘repadmin /syncall’

Server invontory of Windows 2003 serve

Hello,
We have installed the ZFS invenrory agents on several Windows 2000 servers
and 2 Windows 2003 servers.
The Windows 2000 servers invontory just fine. The Windows 2003 serves do
not inventory at all.
The remote control on both 2000 and 2003 work just fine.
I think it may have something to do with the security enhacements in Windows
2003, but I;m not sure where to start.
I have attached a screen shot of the ZFS server screen in hopes it might
help. The IP address listed in one on the Windows 2003 servers in question.
Thanks.

Here is what is in the log file from one of the 2003 servers:
2005.01.31 14:24:06 [TED] Log file maintenance scheduled for: Mon Jan 31
14:24:16 CST 2005
2005.01.31 14:24:21 [TED] Sent variables to policy service.
2005.01.31 23:00:09 [TED] Stopped distribution from distributor
JJMA-P4ZENWORKS.jjma.com due to mismatched destination in route.
2005.01.31 23:00:09 [TED] 192.168.120.10: Workorder proceeding.
2005.01.31 23:00:09 [TED] Distribution Reply for
Server_INV_Distro.Pascms.Dept40.McMullen, 1099544401002, message = 5 was
sent successfully to jjma-p4zenworks.jjma.com
2005.01.31 23:00:10 [TED] Stopped distribution from distributor
JJMA-P4ZENWORKS.jjma.com due to mismatched destination in route.
2005.01.31 23:00:10 [TED] 192.168.120.10: Workorder proceeding.
2005.01.31 23:00:10 [TED] Distribution Reply for
Server_INV_Distro.Pascms.Dept40.McMullen, 1107234000219, message = 5 was
sent successfully to jjma-p4zenworks.jjma.com
"Ron van Herk" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:6mbMd.7776$[email protected]..
> Use iManager, look at the logs or enable the DOSBOX to see what happens on
> the Win 20003 box, maybe that indicates what is causing the refused
> connection.
>
> Ron
>
> "Damon Vanbuskirk" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:5e8Md.7471$[email protected]..
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have installed the ZFS invenrory agents on several Windows 2000
servers
> > and 2 Windows 2003 servers.
> >
> > The Windows 2000 servers invontory just fine. The Windows 2003 serves
do
> > not inventory at all.
> >
> > The remote control on both 2000 and 2003 work just fine.
> >
> > I think it may have something to do with the security enhacements in
> Windows
> > 2003, but I;m not sure where to start.
> >
> > I have attached a screen shot of the ZFS server screen in hopes it might
> > help. The IP address listed in one on the Windows 2003 servers in
> question.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Slow connection with OS X 10.7 while trying to access a Windows 2003 server

Good afternoon:
I am a systems engineer in an enterprise environment that is now deploying Macs and I have been finding that the Macs have a very slow connection to the Windows 2003 server; even after installing all necessry components.
All of the Macs access network services via Active Directory
The issue is the connection speed when trying to access folders on the servers.
Does anyone have any ideas as to speed up this connectivity issue?

Did you resolve this issue? Any links to anwers to this?
thank you.

(Very Ergent)R12 on windows 2003 server with itanium processor...

Hi,
Is it possible.
Processor : Itanium 2(64bit)
OS : Windows 2003 server for itanium (don't know 32/64bit)
http://www.microsoft.com/servers/64bit/itanium/overview.mspx
ERP: R12 for windows(32bit)
Is it possible with these combination
Thanks & Regards,
Shankar

Duplicate thread (please post only once):
Is it possible?
Re: Is it possible?

Problems with Tuxedo8.0 under Windows 2003 Server

Hello All.
Could you please help me?
When we were choosing which OS to install on our Tuxedo developers server we
decided
to try Windows 2003 server. We did not suppose that we could have any
problems
with this choise. But we have!
We use it with DB 7.2 workgroup edition and Tuxedo 8.0 (PatchLevel 172).
When one of server processes crashes (for example by exit(1) or by
exception)
(it happend not so rarely, because this server is actively used in
development
and testing processes) we cannot restart this server process!
When I write "restartsrv -i SrvId" in command line nothing happens.
When I write "tmboot -i SrvId" it says "Duplicate server".
When I write "tmshutdown -i SrvId" it just hangs and I have to wait for 10
minutes
while it says "CMDTUX_CAT:949: WARN: Shutdown failed. 0 processes stopped."
Tuxedo WebAdministration conlsole says almost the same - "Failed to
deactivate SRVGROUP/200
(still in state ACTIVE)-10:CMDTUX_CAT:1689: ERROR: Could not shutdown any
servers".
As a result any server crash (including expected) leads to 15 minutes
waiting!!!
As you understand it cound not be accepted!... and it is very annoying. :-)
This problem never happened under Windows 2000 server (a week before I
returned from site
installation where this software works fine under Windows 2000 server).
How can we solve this problem?
Or should we downgrade our OS to Windows 2000?
With regards,
Dmitry.

Dmitry,
Try a bbclean from the tmadmin command line to clean up the BBL so you will be
able to restart the server using the tmboot command.
In addition to this check the values for SCANUNIT and SANITYSCAN in the ubbconfig.
The observation that it takes 15 minutes for TUXEDO to discover that your server
has crashed suggests they have values that might be too high.
Winfried Scheulderman
"Dmitry Bond" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello All.
Could you please help me?
When we were choosing which OS to install on our Tuxedo developers server
we
decided
to try Windows 2003 server. We did not suppose that we could have any
problems
with this choise. But we have!
We use it with DB 7.2 workgroup edition and Tuxedo 8.0 (PatchLevel 172).
When one of server processes crashes (for example by exit(1) or by
exception)
(it happend not so rarely, because this server is actively used in
development
and testing processes) we cannot restart this server process!
When I write "restartsrv -i SrvId" in command line nothing happens.
When I write "tmboot -i SrvId" it says "Duplicate server".
When I write "tmshutdown -i SrvId" it just hangs and I have to wait for
10
minutes
while it says "CMDTUX_CAT:949: WARN: Shutdown failed. 0 processes stopped."
Tuxedo WebAdministration conlsole says almost the same - "Failed to
deactivate SRVGROUP/200
(still in state ACTIVE)-10:CMDTUX_CAT:1689: ERROR: Could not shutdown
any
servers".
As a result any server crash (including expected) leads to 15 minutes
waiting!!!
As you understand it cound not be accepted!... and it is very annoying.
This problem never happened under Windows 2000 server (a week before
I
returned from site
installation where this software works fine under Windows 2000 server).
How can we solve this problem?
Or should we downgrade our OS to Windows 2000?
With regards,
Dmitry.

Windows 2003 server access getting slow from Windows7/8 client

We have Windows 2003 Enterprise Server. If I try to access through Windows 7 or Windows 8 client PC then I am getting very slow access. Slow access in terms of, if I am taking remote desktop of server [OR] if I directly browse server directory [OR] even
accessing any web application on server it is very slow.
But if I am accessing though any Windows-XP base client or even other servers having Windows 2003 or Windows 2008 then access in good.
But interesting thing is even we have other Windows 2003 server for which I am getting normal response.
Can someone guide me on the same? I am not able to understand the root cause of it.
-Abhay

Start with decreasing SMB version in clients. For inspiration look here
http://www.petri.co.il/how-to-disable-smb-2-on-windows-vista-or-server-2008.htm
Rgds
Milos

Window 2003 server running on Native mode

Hi,
Our portal running on unix envioment and we have to integrate Windows 2003 server running on native mode into CM or File system repository.
Is it possible to integrate the win servers running native mode to portal running on unix env unsing KM.
Thanks,
Damodhar.

its worked, i don't know it cameup after upgraded to SP9.
Thanks

OUI-25031 Cluster Configuration Assistant Fails Windows 2003 server RAC

Hi All
I am installing RAC on Windows 2003 Server X64, Dell PowerEdge 2950 Servers with iSCSI Storage.
I have 3 Network cards on each node which are configured like this
# Public
10.2.0.8 USTISDB-1.USTIS.Brgpoint.com USTISDB-1 --- in DNS
10.2.0.9 USTISDB-2.USTIS.Brgpoint.com USTISDB-2
#Virtual
10.2.0.10 USTISDB-1-vip.USTIS.Brgpoint.com USTISDB-1-vip --- in DNS
10.2.0.11 USTISDB-2-vip.USTIS.Brgpoint.com USTISDB-2-vip
#Private
192.168.2.2 USTISDB-1-priv.USTIS.Brgpoint.com USTISDB-1-priv --- in Hosts file
192.168.2.3 USTISDB-2-priv.USTIS.Brgpoint.com USTISDB-2-priv
#iSCSI Storage
192.168.1.2 Storage --- in DNS
Everything Pings everything.
When I start the installation , it installs clusterware and completes the remote operations but fails at cluster configuration window.
After checking the logs I found the list of failed commands and it says
INFO: Command = C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd /c call E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\crs/install/crssetup.config.bat
PROT-1: Failed to initialize ocrconfig
Step 1: checking status of CRS cluster
Step 2: creating directories (E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\crs)
Step 3: configuring OCR repository
ocr upgrade failed with (-1)
Execution of the plugin was aborted
INFO: Configuration assistant "Oracle Clusterware Configuration Assistant" was canceled.
and then I checked E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\crs\cfgtoollogs/configToolFailedCommands and i says
rem Copyright (c) 1999, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd /c call E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\crs/install/crssetup.config.bat
E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\crs/bin/racgons.exe add_config USTISDB-1.USTIS.Brgpoint.com:6200 USTISDB-2.USTIS.Brgpoint.com:6200
E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\crs/bin/oifcfg.exe setif -global "public"/10.0.0.0:public "private"/192.168.2.0:cluster_interconnect
C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd /c call E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\crs/bin/vipca.bat -silent -nodelist "USTISDB-1,USTISDB-2" -nodevips "USTISDB-1//255.0.0.0/public,USTISDB-2//255.0.0.0/public"
C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd /c call E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\crs/bin/cluvfy.bat stage -post crsinst -n "USTISDB-1,USTISDB-2"
Please help, Any help will be highly appreciated.
Edited by: user651560 on Nov 13, 2008 3:24 PM

E:\Staging\102010_win64_x64_clusterware\clusterware\cluvfy>runcluvfy stage -pre crsinst -n ustisdb-1,ustisdb-2 -verbose
The system cannot find the file specified.
Performing pre-checks for cluster services setup
Checking node reachability...
Check: Node reachability from node "USTISDB-1"
Destination Node Reachable?
ustisdb-1 yes
ustisdb-2 yes
Result: Node reachability check passed from node "USTISDB-1".
Checking user equivalence...
Check: User equivalence for user "Administrator"
Node Name Comment
ustisdb-2 passed
ustisdb-1 passed
Result: User equivalence check passed for user "Administrator".
Checking administrative privileges...
Checking node connectivity...
Interface information for node "ustisdb-2"
Interface Name IP Address Subnet
public 10.2.0.9 10.0.0.0
private 192.168.2.3 192.168.2.0
san 192.168.1.6 192.168.1.0
Interface information for node "ustisdb-1"
Interface Name IP Address Subnet
public 10.2.0.8 10.0.0.0
private 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.0
san 192.168.1.5 192.168.1.0
Check: Node connectivity of subnet "10.0.0.0"
Source Destination Connected?
ustisdb-2:public ustisdb-1:public yes
Result: Node connectivity check passed for subnet "10.0.0.0" with node(s) ustisdb-2,ustisdb-1.
Check: Node connectivity of subnet "192.168.2.0"
Source Destination Connected?
ustisdb-2:private ustisdb-1:private yes
Result: Node connectivity check passed for subnet "192.168.2.0" with node(s) ustisdb-2,ustisdb-1.
Check: Node connectivity of subnet "192.168.1.0"
Source Destination Connected?
ustisdb-2:san ustisdb-1:san yes
Result: Node connectivity check passed for subnet "192.168.1.0" with node(s) ustisdb-2,ustisdb-1.
Suitable interfaces for the private interconnect on subnet "10.0.0.0":
ustisdb-2 public:10.2.0.9
ustisdb-1 public:10.2.0.8
Suitable interfaces for the private interconnect on subnet "192.168.2.0":
ustisdb-2 private:192.168.2.3
ustisdb-1 private:192.168.2.2
Suitable interfaces for the private interconnect on subnet "192.168.1.0":
ustisdb-2 san:192.168.1.6
ustisdb-1 san:192.168.1.5
ERROR:
Could not find a suitable set of interfaces for VIPs.
Result: Node connectivity check failed.
Checking system requirements for 'crs'...
Check: Operating system version
Node Name Available Required Comment
ustisdb-2 Windows Server 2003 Windows Server 2003 passed
ustisdb-1 Windows Server 2003 Windows Server 2003 passed
Result: Operating system version check passed.
Check: Total memory
Node Name Available Required Comment
ustisdb-2 15.99GB (16771724KB) 512MB (524288KB) passed
ustisdb-1 15.99GB (16771724KB) 512MB (524288KB) passed
Result: Total memory check passed.
Check: Swap space
Node Name Available Required Comment
ustisdb-2 17.4GB (18241648KB) 1GB (1048576KB) passed
ustisdb-1 17.4GB (18241648KB) 1GB (1048576KB) passed
Result: Swap space check passed.
Check: System architecture
Node Name Available Required Comment
ustisdb-2 64-bit 64-bit passed
ustisdb-1 64-bit 64-bit passed
Result: System architecture check passed.
Check: Free disk space in "C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1.UST\LOCALS~1\Temp\1" dir
Node Name Available Required Comment
ustisdb-2 23.7GB (24848248KB) 400MB (409600KB) passed
ustisdb-1 23.65GB (24797157KB) 400MB (409600KB) passed
Result: Free disk space check passed.
System requirement passed for 'crs'
Pre-check for cluster services setup was unsuccessful on all the nodes.

LabView DSC + OPC Servers + Windows 2003 server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for