Language change in work flow

hi,
I would like to know how to change the work item language(in inbox the work item subject should come in the language in which a person logs in to the system)say if a person logs in french the work item subject in inbox should come in french.likewise if a person logs in italian the subject should be in italian.
Can anyone help me out to solve this issue.
Regards
dinesh

Actually, that is just the same issue as in work item text - dynamic language
The answer: YES, it is possible. There is a setting each user can make.
Transaction SBWP
Menu item Settings => Workflow settings => Personal settings
In the lower part you find the option (in English) "Display work item texts in logon language".
For translation, I've seen other solutions, but one that also works is to log in to the system in the language you want to translate to and just translate and save the text.

Similar Messages

Work flow of Engineering Change Management

Hi,
We have created the Transport Request , few are customization(Creation of programme mamager) and few for work flow( change in work flow).
What is the sequence of Transport this request?

Hi,
this you need to check with your developer, whether any dependency is there for this transport. Based on the dependency, in a particular order you need to transport, else the transport will fail.
regards,
V. Suresh

UCCX change work flow group based on CSQ

Does it possible to assign a work flow group to a CSQ, or change the work flow group from script ?
Rg,
Gerald.

gerald.chong wrote:Thanks for the explanations. I understand the layout can be change via the script, but that I am require to do is to have different wrapup code based on different queue. Will it be possible ?
Sadly, I don't think this is possible. I just looked into this a couple weeks ago for a customer that asked us for the very same thing. The only built-in alternative I was able to offer them is to load up the entire wrap-up code list carefully sorted and prefixed, like "HR: Tax Changes" and "HR: Benefits Changes" and "OtherTopic: Reason 1" and "OtherTopic: Reason 2". I believe there's no built-in limit to number of wrap-up codes.
As another alternative, my company (and several others) have external wrap-up code applications that are much more flexible, and can offer different wrap-up codes on a per-CSQ basis. It was written to fill wrap-up code needs back before UCCX gained built-in wrap-up codes, so we don't really sell it too much these days, but it does fill a need here and there for certain customers.

Modify Transition element in work flow using for and not attributes to restrict access

Hi,
I have TFS 2013 for my premises and I am working on changing the work flow for TFS work item. I have created a work item as per requirement and it has 3 states
Active, In Review and Closed in work flow. When developer creates a work item it is in Active state and later it is sent to In Review and then to close after successful review.
My question is I want development team to be restricted to move the work item to Close state. At present when developer creates a new work item they see Active state. At this point they can not see any other states in the work item. Later they
fill the details and after checkin they will put that work item to In Review state. At this point they can see Active and In Review states. When they save this work item and modify it again they see Close state as well. I want to design the Transition element
in work flow in such a way then developers should not be able to see the Close state at all in a work item assigned to them. Only reviewer should be able to transit the work item from In Review to Close.
I checked the for and not attributes in the transition element but I have no idea about correct syntax I should use to enforce the restriction. I would also like to mention here that I have no separate groups defined in my TFS server. Every
one is a part of contributor's group. There is no specific group of reviewers and one developer reviews the code of another. I want to design the work flow in such a way that the developer who creates (or gets assigned) the work item should
not be able to put their own work item in Close state but they should be able to close another developer's work item if that work item has his name in the reviewer's box.
I have tried to simplify my question by elaborating it hope it is not complex to understand. Let me know if you want further clarification on this.
Regards, Premal Acharya

Hi Premal,
For your scenario, seems the "for" and "not" attributes not are unavailable to make it happens. Because of the developers not in groups, and the same type of work items can be assigned to all the developers hence the attributes cannot
be allow and deny users in the groups concurrently. Please check the
page for more information about transition xml element.
Based on your situation, you can separate the development group and test group. Then you can only allow test group to change the state.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Regarding Production order changes work flows

Hi to all,
I activated WS20000387 work flow template. its regarding the production order changes .
briefly: i created one production order, immediately assigned person will get a message in his SAP inbox.
he has to double click/execute on that mail, then system will take u directly to the production order screen. there is no need to enter that Order no.
but here, after double clicking, system is asking The Order no.
we have clients 300,500 and 700.
i executed same work flow in 300 successfully,
700 is not modifiable. thats y i did all the settings in 500 and copied the request to 700.
i am getting the problem in 700,, i compared all the settings in 300 and 700, but no use,,,all are same,,,but not executing in 700.
anybody can help me in this regard.

You Can use below FM to confirm Production order and it is very simple BAPI.
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR -> just check in where used list.
Thanks
Seshu

How to reflect new changes in older instance of work flow?

Hi All,
I am working on a custom workflow.
This workflow is triggered by web dynpro component.
Earlier my custom infotype was getting updated from web dynpro, and work flow is used to maintain process flow.
But currently we started facing some authorization issue while updating infotypes for approvers.
So now i introduced an activity in work flow to update this infotype from work flow using WF_Batch
(calling method of a class to update the infotype), and commented the code to update infotype from web dynpro.
Now the problem is, i have few requests raised using older version of work flow,
in which the activity to update infotype was not there.
New requests are working fine, infotype is getting updated using work flow.
But in older requests when i am viewing from SWIA that new activity to update infotype is not visible.
How can i implement the changes to older instances of work flow?
Because for older requests in web dynpro also there is no code to update infotype as well as in older work flow instance
my activity to update infotype is not visible.
Waiting for help.....
Regards,
Amar

Hi Amar,
The changes will be reflected for new instances that are created after the transport of the new workflow definition.
The instances of old definition will continue as it is.
However a workaround could be that you can end the old definition instances by logically deleting them and start new workflow by T code SWUS or generating event by SWUE and go through the whole process again.
Re- triggering of the workflow seems to be only solution here .
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sangvir Singh

Error in work flow wait for change event

Error in work flow wait for change event of business object bus1014, Actually this business object is triggering for two transaction one is me21n and another is c201 . am trying to create fork with two branches one is create and another if change occurs wait will trigger, bt when i trigger work flow controll is not after fork, it will stop in fork only. and am not getting my workflow container variable getting instantiate, am getting error in wait. please any one get out of me in this

Hi Sangeetha
What is LV_MATERIAL? is it a BO container element? or a class element or a just a simple variable?
Error message is clear, you are trying to evaluate LV_MATERIAL but it does not contain a value.
This is a custom workflow as it begins with WS9xxxxxxx... what is LV_MATERIAL used for? what are we expecting it to hold? maybe, from event to workflow binding we can pass the value to it.
Please share the following:
1) Definition screen shot of LV_MATERIAL
2) Screen shot of The step where it is first used - from SWDD
3) Screenshot of Event to Workflow Binding
4) name of your base Business Object (seen in the triggering events tab of the WF template in PFTC)
5) What is the corresponding variable for that BO in your workflow container
6) Screen shot of WF definition from SWDD - please identify the step going in error in that screen shot
Regards,
Modak

Work flow for Change Request not reliably sending emails.

I created a work flow that sends an email to a changers Manager whenever a routine Change Request is created. Sometimes the email does not go and I narrowed it down to a possible race condition between the workflow running and Service Manager adding the
Manager in as a Reviewer on the Review Activity.
When I hard code a recipient into the Reviewer list, the email works every time. When I leave the Reviewers list blank and check the box "Line Manager should review", Service Manager properly adds the changers Manager in as a Reviewer but the email
sometimes does not work.
What I am thinking is the workflow is running before Service Manager can add the Manager in as a Reviewer and therefore no email. If this is the case, is this a possible bug or how do I delay the workflow and give Service Manager enough time to populate
the Reviewer list on the Review Activity.

"Updated" is not going to work. Now the Manager gets two emails identical to each other and when the Approve the RA, they get a third. Basically every time the RA is touched, it fires an email. Can't have this.
So, back to "Created". It is still unreliable. I did not think getting an email sent would be this much trouble. Basically all I am trying to do is when a user creates a Change Request, their Manager gets an email notifying them that a Review
Activity needs attention.
If anyone has any idea on how to do this, let me know. Is there any way I can do this with a notification subscription instead of a workflow? I tried to use a subscription but I could not figure out what criteria to use to send an email to the changers Manager.

Work Flow Trigering based on Material Master change

Dear All
Any suggestion to trigger a work flow when the procuremnt key in the material master is changed.
We are facing the problem of not informing all the relavent parties when the planner changes the <b>procurement key from F to E or vice versa</b>.
Also the spec. <b>procurement key changed to 30, 50 etc.,</b>
Because the information is not flown to other relevant sections, the whole master data in in a mess and MRP proposals are greatly affected.
On top of that MRP proposal are not used because of this.
Please reply
Thanks

Hi Raj,
have you looked in the event trace, when this change has been made? It should give you a CHANGED event, that you can start your workflow on. TX for start event trace is SWELS and look into the trace is SWEL.
When you design your workflow enter a start condition, only to react on a change to the procurement key.
I think there is an example almost identical to this in the BIT601 material.
Kind regards
Mikkel

SAP STANDARD RETRIGGER WORK FLOW FOR SC CHANGES -SRM 550

Hello ALL
assume that we use any standard sap WF templates
SC created
SC awaiting for manager approval
now requester changes any piece of data . will work flow retrigger ( again workitem created) for any cosmetic changes upon standard work flow templates used?
what are the actions on shopping cart will retrigger the workflow
now sc is awaiting for approval but below actions done by REQUESTER in the shopping cart
1. changing sc descrition name?
2. notes for approval?
3.change qty /price /uom/ pg /product changes/ cost center changes /add attachment
4.changing vendor
please share what are the above actions will retrigger the workflow in SAP STANDARD.
etc
Mutu

Hi,
There is BBP_WFL_SECURITY setting in SRM 5.0.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/37/830b3b7e7ef74de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
I'm not sure if the table BBPD_COMP_FIELDS is for checking the changes.
We can get answer by testing.
Regards,
Masa

Can i rollback my workflow versions changes in mm work flow?

Dear All,
Can i rollback my workflow versions changes in mm work flow?
Moosa

Hi ,
please refer to this blog for versioning -
/people/sunil.ojha5/blog/2008/01/29/versions-of-a-workflow
Thanks,
sahiba

Change a value of a field in the work flow notification

Hi All,
I have a requirement,where in i need to change a value of a field in the work flow notification that i receive.
is it posiible
if so please provide some inputs.Thanks

Hi;
Please check below which could be helpful for your issue:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B14117_01/workflow.101/b10283/instal10.htm
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/workflow.102/b15853/T361836T361983.htm
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/integration.1111/e10226/hwf_config.htm#BHCJDGFJ
Regard
Helios

Work flow - How can Decision step execute on change status in UI

Hi Frds,
I search a lot but cound not found right link.
How can we execute a Decision Step (Approve or Reject) in WF when User try change the Status from the Web UI and SAVE order.
Thanks
Imran

Yes I did...now toss me a cookie please.
I am trying to quickly get up to speed in Pr CS4 to get this project completed. In the process, I'm trying to learn and understand the interface and correct terminology so as to make my questions intelligible to a community that posses vastly greater understanding than myself.
Is there anyone who can help with my main question at hand? Namely, how to go about creating a full length sequence (in the timeline) made via the nesting of synchronized multi-camera clips within a new "multi-cam sequence"?
As I said, I have completed a small test sequence in this fashion, nesting clips in a new sequence then using multi-cam monitor to record cuts. Now I need to add about 10 more of these together in a completed sequence to then send to DVD production.
Is this intelligible?
Thanks, Kenny
__0
_ \<,_
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:11:06 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Work flow? How to link multi-cam sequences for DVD output?
please take my hand and help me!
Well, at least you had the gumption to admit that up front.
>

Work flow issue- Changes are not reflected at rum time

Hi,
    I want to change the Work item text for a task in a workfolw.
    When i am executing the worklow after changing the work item text of the required task(this task creates a work item), the change is not reflected. The work item is ceated with the previous text.
   Please tell me how to make change to reflect at the run time.
regards,
Shweta.

Hi ,
the problem may be in refreshing of buffer . Try to synchronize buffer manually using transaction SWU_OBUF.
Regards
Saurabh

Work flow status is not changing

Hi,
The work flow is not ending. The last approver is getting the item in his inbox repeatedly though he has approved it previously and the workflow status is showing as still in progress.
Please kindly help me to solve this
Regards,
Sekhar.

Hi Chandrashekar,
When we create w work item in the workflow, we specify the thing we want to perform in it.When the task is perform we need to set the event for the end task.Event can be repoting higher autority , a mail or something.After we set a task or work process we need to handle the end manuallly.It never gets terminated itself but we have to terminate it manually.Even if you are sending the approval from the user after task completion and you must have ended the procedure.Now as the last task is not handeled properly.That is executing in endless loop.So you may go for termination of workprocess after the last mail.If you have used loop untill please use container with it.It will be helpfule.Hope your query resolves soon.
Have a best day ahead.

Language change in work flow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for