Latest supported version of the Java SDK for XI R3.1

Hi all,
            Does anyone have any ideas or views on the latest supported version of the Java SDK for 3.1 on windows ?
We are using Tomcat which ships with SDK version 1.5.0_12, I know that updating this to a later version can result in a considerable performance boost for Infoview and its supported applications especially webintelligence.

Hi Bashir, That's interesting  you're using a relatively up to date version of the java SDK. Business Objects documentation states that versions up to 1.5.0_xx are supported. Did you notice any improvements in performance of the system by using the later version 1.6.0_17 ?. There are generally very significant improvements in successive updates of the SDK in term of memory management, reliability and other general bug fixes, so it's something that we will take into consideration.
      Thanks

Similar Messages

  • What is the latest current version of the Actiontec router for FiOS internet?

    Hello,
    I will be moving in a couple of months and I'm wondering if I should turn in my current router and ask for a new one when I get the service installed at my new house, vs taking my current router with me.  I've had mine for over 2 years now. The main issue I have is that the signal is sort of weak. I will be moving to a much bigger place and I'm worried the wireless won't be strong enough to reach end to end or outside.  
    Can someone confirm the latest and greatest Actiontec model # of the router that they are installing, and I can check to see if it's something newer than what I have.
    Thanks

    The Verizon routers do have a good amount of range on them. I'm using an ActionTec MI424-WR Rev. D running DD-WRT on my DSL connection, which replaced an older and slowly dying Linksys WRT54GXv1. The ActionTec seems to broadcast just as far as the Linksys does. Transfer wise when I go out that far, I don't know how nicely it works yet but I've seen no issues with it in my home. Other homes with the FiOS routers, it is generally due to the positioning of the router (Basements are terrible places, signals don't go down nicely) or due to being on a noisy channel. In some cases, an antenna replacement is all that is needed, and additionally, disabling the Auto-Scan function and setting a channel manually on the router work wonders as well.
    The Rev. G should be able to get better range by design, since it is N compliant and supports MIMO. The Rev. F and older routers do have two antennas, one internal and one external SMA antenna, so they do support Diversity as a result which helps with range and speed.
    I do agree with you however with the routers needing a better design. More RAM for future proofing, more antennas (Maybe 6 Internal, two external?) with Simultaneous dual-band Wireless N, Gigabit and better firmware design would be nice. Wouldo also be nice to see the return of Ethernet installs comes around, instead of it being for only the 150Mbps connections. It'd be less headaches in the long run and better service quality despite some additional install time and more cabling.
    ========
    The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

  • Correct version of Java SDK for Red Hat 4 ES on x86_64

    I need to install the Java SDK for Red Hat 4 ES on x86_64 and I'm unable to find the correct version to download.
    Note 716604 says to download 1.4.2_13 at java.sun.com but the I can't find the Linux x86_64 bit version.  Note 941595 is for Windows and Solaris only.
    Red Hat's site mentions two versions; java-1.4.2-ibm and java-1.4.2-bea.  I cannot find any SAP notes that mention those names.  Has anyone used these successfully on Red Hat 4 x86_64?
    Does anyone know where I can download the correct version of Java SDK?
    Thanks

    <a href="https://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/iwm/web/reg/download.do?source=lxdk&S_PKG=amd64142sr7&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&cp=UTF-8">https://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/iwm/web/reg/download.do?source=lxdk&S_PKG=amd64142sr7&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&cp=UTF-8</a>
    I can open that link without a problem.
    Check again...
    Markus

  • What are the latest supported versions of JDK1.4.1 and JRE1.4  on Windows

    Please tell the latest supported versions of both JDK1.4.1 and JRE1.4.1 on Windows 2003.
    If no support is there for 1.4.1 versions then are there any higher versions.
    we have to port the application from Windows2000 to windows2003. On win2000 it runs fine on JRE1.4.1.
    But on Windows 2003 it is running properly on jre included in JDK1.4.1 but not on JRE1.4.1.
    What can be the reason for it ? Does win2003 supports JRE1.4.1?

    You didn't say why it isn't running.
    The most likely reason is that there is an environment problem.
    If you have the same versions of the JDK and JRE then the JRE in the JDK is exactly the same as the standalone JRE.
    It could be that it is also using OS specific stuff, like JNI and/or Runtime.exec().

  • Just tried to install the latest firmware version and the screen has been grey for the last 30 mins

    Just tried to install the latest firmware version and the screen has been grey for the last 30 mins, any ideas what to do now?

    ..Step by Step to fix your Mac

  • Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

    Issue Summary
    In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA.  We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20.  We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar.  The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
    RuleSet.xml Test
    Ruleset.xml

    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    &lt;ruleset version=&quot;1.0+&quot;&gt;  
    &lt;rule&gt;
       &lt;id location=&quot;*.javatester.org&quot; /&gt;
       &lt;action permission=&quot;run&quot; version=&quot;1.6*&quot; /&gt;
    &lt;/rule&gt;
    &lt;ruleset version=&quot;1.0+&quot;&gt;
    &lt;rule&gt;
       &lt;id location=&quot;*.internaldomain.name&quot; /&gt;
       &lt;action permission=&quot;run&quot; version=&quot;1.6*&quot; /&gt;
    &lt;/rule&gt;
    &lt;/ruleset&gt;
    Test 1 (Control)
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
    Test 2
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
    With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
    Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
    The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
    1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
    4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
    If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
    As a result:
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
    #2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
    #3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
    I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

    I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
    So here goes;
    I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
    When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
    The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
    When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
    UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
    In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
    Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
    This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
    "Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
    I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

  • Back level the Java sdk from 1.4.2.75 to 1.4.2.20

    Hi,
    Due to some some techincal issue while installing a patch our OS team found some issues with Java sdk 1.4.2.75,So they back level the java sdk with 1.4.2.20 and now they could install the patch without any issues.
    So can anyone let me know what would be the impact of the following changes on my application.
    Can anyone let me know the difference between this 2 versions.
    Thanks,
    Satish

    Read the release notes for the different versions. The only differences should be bug fixes.
    Btw. Are that IBM versions?

  • Java SDK for windows 3.1

    I have an old 486 in my room. The computer that has the SDK is out where my parents can see me when I'm doing my late night programming. I want to be able to put the java SDK on my Packard Bell 486 running windows 98. I searched and searched and searched some more off of google for a Java SDK for windows 3.1. The only thing i can find is IBM's program which they no longer service or even give you links to download their past versions. I am wondering if any of you guys know of any java SDK that will work on my 486 with windows 3.1.

    "I think your parents should buy you a nicer machine for your room. ;-)
    Good luck with that."
    LOL
    I have begged my dad to get a new computer just for the regular comptuer. The computer that I will "get caught" on is over 4.5 years old. When I ask him for another one he always says the one we have works.

  • Java SDK for RoboSapien RS Media

    I have heard that there was a Java SDK for RoboSapien RS Media. I talked to a Customer Support Rep at WowWee and they said that the current Java SDK would work in it. If not that I can obtain the right one from Sun? But I can't seem to find where I could contact sun about it? The chat rep kept referring me to their downloads section but it's not listed. I was told by WowWee it was a CD and not a download.
    Anyone know where I can get some help with this?

    TikaC wrote:
    I don't think that is what I'm looking for. I am told the robot itself (ie. movements and stuff) can be programmed in Java. But there was a CD for the RoboSapien RS Media SDK and only 300 of the RS media was sold with the CD. Now I can't find them (or the SDK anywhere). Just RS medias without the SDK CDs.
    Anyone know who I can contact about this and/or if anyone remembers these?I suspect you need both a standard JDK (probably) but you'll also be needing some libraries (jar files) of classes that you would be using in Java code to actually do things with the thing-a-bob.
    To be honest I think you could be screwed Google finds alot of things saying "Coming soon" from 2007 and not much since..

  • Is there a Java SDK for Siebel Analytics/Oracle BI

    Hi, I want to integrate with Siebel Analytics (now known as Oracle Business Intelligence, right?) to our product. Is there a JAVA SDK for Siebel Analytics/Oracle BI? If so, can anyone point me to the right place to get them. Much appreciated.

    There is currently no JDK or any other API to work with OBI EE (formerly Siebel Analytics).
    The presentation component exposes some functionality via web services.
    You can interact with the BI Server via NQCMD so you could build your own application that executes NQCMDs but this is not well documented other than typing NQCMD ? at the command line.
    The OBI Metadata is captured in a .rpd file which can be manipulated via UDML but this is not supported - do a search on Google for UDML (which is a proprietary format) for some examples on using this. OWB recently rolled out with some integration with OBI - it accomplishes this by manipulating the .rpd file using UDML.
    The Oracle folks monitor this forum. If you can reply with some specifics as to what you want to accomplish, I'm sure they will consider your needs if they decide to publish an API.

  • Sun Studio (12,1) is unable to find a supported version of the Netbeans IDE

    Hi all,
    We're working on upgrading both the hardware and software on our application currently, and part of this involves upgrading our compiler to Sun Studio 12.1. I downloaded
    SunStudio12u1-SunOS-SPARC-pkgs-ML.tar.bz2
    from the Sun website and we installed it into the following location on our server:
    /opt/compiler/sunstudio12.1
    I successfully compiled all my code using the compiler, however, when I try to launch the debugger by typing ./sunstudio in the 'bin' directory, I get the following error:
    {opt/compiler/sunstudio12.1/bin}./sunstudio
    Sun Studio is unable to find a supported version of the NetBeans IDE.
    Sun Studio requires a NetBeans IDE version 6.5.1 with NetBeans C/C++ module (cnd
    2) enabled.
    Sun Studio looks for a valid NetBeans IDE installation in the following order:
    1) Location specified with --netbeanshome command line option
    2) At /opt/compiler/sunstudio12.1/netbeans
    I have seen references to executing 'prepare_system' on forums while I was trying to investigate this, but when our sys admin folks try to execute the command, it does not work (command not found). They've mentioned that they expected a prepare_system script in the directory where we untarred the downloaded sun studio tarfile, but it is not there:
    drwxrwxr-x 4 59001 staff 1024 Aug 20 2009 .
    drwxr-xr-x 3 yu12 lifecad 1024 Jul 2 09:48 ..
    drwxrwxr-x 4 59001 staff 1024 Aug 17 2009 LEGAL
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 59001 staff 3985 Aug 19 2009 SS12u1_README-pkgs.txt
    -rw-r--r-- 1 59001 staff 5598 Aug 20 2009 SS12u1_README-pkgs_ja.html
    -rw-r--r-- 1 59001 staff 4155 Aug 20 2009 SS12u1_README-pkgs_zh.html
    -rwxrwxr-x 1 59001 staff 517979136 Aug 6 2009 SunStudio12u1-SunOS-SPARC-pkgs.sh
    -rwxrwxr-x 1 59001 staff 11814 Aug 6 2009 install_patches.sh
    drwxrwxr-x 5 59001 staff 96 Aug 17 2009 patches
    I can see a netbeans directory was created as part of the install, but I'm not sure why sun studio thinks netbeans is not available (afraid my knowledge about netbeans is practically non existent):
    {opt/compiler/sunstudio12.1/netbeans}ls -l
    total 6062
    drwxr-x--- 2 root root 512 Apr 5 11:14 bin
    drwxr-x--- 7 root root 512 Apr 5 11:14 cnd2
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5254 Mar 5 2009 CREDITS_ja.html
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5175 Mar 5 2009 CREDITS_pt_BR.html
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 4908 Mar 5 2009 CREDITS_zh_CN.html
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5434 Mar 5 2009 CREDITS.html
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 1717 Mar 5 2009 DISTRIBUTION.txt
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 0 Aug 6 2009 dummy
    drwxr-x--- 2 root root 512 Apr 5 11:14 etc
    drwxr-x--- 7 root root 512 Apr 5 11:14 gsf1
    drwxr-x--- 6 root root 512 Apr 5 11:14 ide10
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 1845 Mar 5 2009 LEGALNOTICE.txt
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 64275 Mar 5 2009 LICENSE.txt
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 37141 Mar 5 2009 moduleCluster.properties
    drwxr-x--- 7 root root 512 Apr 5 11:14 nb6.5
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 15822 Mar 5 2009 netbeans.css
    drwxr-x--- 8 root root 512 Apr 5 11:14 platform9
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 6141 Mar 5 2009 README_ja.html
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5692 Mar 5 2009 README_pt_BR.html
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5122 Mar 5 2009 README_zh_CN.html
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5155 Mar 5 2009 README.html
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2913280 Mar 5 2009 THIRDPARTYLICENSE.txt
    drwxr-x--- 5 root root 512 Apr 5 11:14 websvccommon1
    Our server details are:
    {opt/compiler}uname -a
    SunOS a03714 5.10 Generic_142900-03 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5440
    Any advice appreciated on how to get the debugger working. Ideally, I'd prefer not to uninstall / reinstall if at all possible as we're about to start system testing our executables, and I think a reinstall would require more unit teting and delays to our project (yikes!). But any input would be appreciated here.
    Thanks,
    Brendan.

    Hi David,
    First off - thanks for the response. I do have some follow up questions if you don't mind though:
    1. When you say the install is corrupted, do you suspect
    - the file I downloaded from the website either was corrupted, or was not the correct file for my platform
    - the procedure used to install the software was incorrect
    - something else
    2. Is there a logfile that the sun studio install creates which would indicate an error during the installation procedure? I'm sure our admins who performed the install would have shouted if an error was logged... but on the offchance that the installation does not 'shout loudly' for some errors, I'd like to see a log of the error. At a minimum, I'd expect it to say why the install failed, and what we need to modify to ensure a successful install next time 'round.
    3. I successfully compiled my code using the C compiler from the install. My unit tests also look good... does this suggest that the install was at least a partial success, and would you suspect that my recompiled executables are reliable, despite the fact that I cannot launch the IDE?
    4. Today, one of our admins telnetted to our unix server - not via exceed by the way, but he did try the following test:
    - set his display env variable (he knew he would not get a display however)
    - executed the sunstudio script
    He did not get the netbeans error, and the process appeared to be running (as I mentioned, without a display) until he killed it. I've asked if they can repeat the test using an exceed session. I thought there may be something on his $PATH that I did not have - unfortunately this was not the case (although, he may have access as 'root' to something that I require to launch the IDE). My question is, would you expect this behaviour if the install was corrupted?
    Let me know what you think.
    Thanks,
    Brendan.

  • Downloading and Installing Java SDK for AIX

    Could anyone please tell me where can i download Java SDk for AIX and how to install it before installing SAP?
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi Mega,
    You can downloads Java SDK 1.4.2 from this location, just choose the OS,
    https://sdlc5d.sun.com/ECom/EComActionServlet;jsessionid=CA558AF3F6842F61D26641D9A6853DCA
    installation is very simple, just copy the downloaded file and execute by running <b>./<name of the file>.sh</b> at the command prompt.
    Regards
    Juan
    Please reward with points if helpful

  • How can install java sdk for mac os x 10.6.8

    How can install java sdk for mac os x 10.6.8?

    Deanwdd wrote:
    I mean to update Quicktime for Mac Os X 10.6.8...
    If you're running 10.6.8, Apple menu > Software Update. What version of QT do you have?

  • Sun Studio is unable to find a supported version of the NetBeans IDE at the

    I'm following the system install instructions in the Grid Compute Utility guide, Appendix A "Building a Local Development Environment" and am getting stuck on step 4, installing sunstudio. I'm running Solaris 5.10 on x86 and can run netbeans IDE without problem. Here is some info, I'm not sure what other system info is relevant:
    bash-3.00# which netbeans
    /opt/netbeans-5.5.1/bin/netbeans
    bash-3.00# which sunstudio
    /usr/bin/sunstudio
    bash-3.00# sunstudio
    Validating NetBeans IDE at: "/opt/SUNWspro/../netbeans-5.5.1"
    Sun Studio is unable to find a supported version of the NetBeans IDE at the specified location.
    Sun Studio requires a NetBeans IDE version 5.5.1 with NetBeans C/C++ Development Pack version 5.5.1
    installed. Sun Studio looks for a valid NetBeans IDE installation in the following order:
    1) Location specified with --netbeanshome command line option
    2) At /opt/netbeans-5.5.1 location, if exists
    3) At /opt/SUNWspro/../netbeans-5.5.1 location, if exists
    4) At /opt/SUNWspro/../../netbeans-5.5.1 location, if exists
    Please run the System Preparation Tool (prepare_system), if available, to set up your environment.
    Any help!?

    Did you install NetBeans separately or let Sun Studio installer do it? The latter usually results in working configuration.
    I think that NetBeans installation simply doesn't have c++ pack; you can install one following usual NetBeans modules installation path and then re-try starting Sun Studio.
    Another option is to uninstall NetBeans and re-install Sun Studio using its installer, which should set up NetBeans properly.

  • Where do I get the Gateway SDK for developing custom Filters?

    Hi,
    Where do I get the gateway SDK for developing custom Filters?
    Regards,
    Earnest A Thomas

    Hi,
    There is not actual SDK to download, its in your installation already. The JavaDoc of all classes are in \doc.11122\javadoc in the ZipFile, http://download.oracle.com/docs/cds/E50612_01.zip (From page: Oracle Enterprise Gateway). There is an online documentation including a tutorial at http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E39820_01/doc.11121/gateway_docs/content/general_filter.html
    There should be some simple pre-made filters with source code somewhere but I think you might need to contact support to get your hands on those as I can't find them.
    Cheers,
    Stefan

Maybe you are looking for