Launching ERP (ECC 6.0) from CLM

Hello,
We have a requirement for a phase in our CLM roll out to create a link in a master agreement to launch ERP to view the contact in ME33k. 
Has anyone done something similar in CLM? or is there any standard functionality to accomplish this. 
I was thinking that this coudl possibly be accomplished by creating a URL extension definition and launching ITS to display ME33k with the contract number passed as a parameter.
Any thoughts?
Thanks in Advance,
Kyle

Hi
We have done something similar where we are viewing a SAP DMS record from CLM. I have created a URL Extension and generating the link to dms via a toolbar script. (i.e.  in the toolbar script call a web service to create a DMS record passing the contract number and any other fields you need). This link points to a BSP app.
You could do something like that :).
Hope this helps
Kind Regards
Thashin

Similar Messages

  • Changes in ECC 6.0 from 4.6

    Hi Experts,
    Can you give me some ideas on what are the changes in ECC 6.0 from the following SAP Transactions, Many Thanks
    General ledger     FI     
    - post document with different document types     FI     "
    FB50"
    - display document     FI     FB03
    - reverse document     FI     FB08
    - print document     FI     F.62
    - display/change line items     FI     FBL3N
    - display balancies     FI     FS10N
    - clear account     FI     F-03
    reporting     FI     
    - P/L+B/S     FI     S_ARL_87012284
    - document journal     FI     S_ALR_87012287
    - general ledger     FI     S_ALR_87012282
    Closing     FI     
    - valuation AP and AR     FI     F.05
    - valuation G/L     FI     F.05
    - valuation bank accounts     FI     F.05
    Others     FI     
    - standard analysis     SD     MCSI
    - creating order     CO     KO01
    Master records          
    - creating account in chart of account     FI     FSP0
    - creating account in company code     FI     FSS0
    - edit financial statement     FI     OB58/FSE2
    - exchange rates     FI     S_BCE_68000174
    - open and close period     FI     S_ARL_87003642
    Accounts payable     FI     
    - create vendor     FI     FK01
    - document entry/fast entry     FI     FB10
    - post/delete invoice     FI     FBV0
    - vendor display/change line items     FI     FBL1N
    - payment run dom/foreign test also with bank     FI     F110
    - post manual outgoing payment     FI     F-53
    - post manual incoming payment     FI     F-52
    Reporting     FI     
    Accounts receivables          
    - change customer master data     FI     XD02
    - post invoice     FI     FB70
    - customer display/change line items     FI     FBL5N
    - post manual incoming payment     FI     F-28
    - dunning run     FI     F150
    Reporting     FI     
    - open items     FI     F.27
    - account statement     FI     F.27
    - customer line items     FI     

    Dear Jaffer,
    Please visit the following links:
    http://service.sap.com/erp
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
    http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
    For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
    Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
    Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
    Click on Search
    Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
    and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
    Hope this helps you.
    Do award points if you found them useful.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

  • Gereral differences between 4.7 and ECC 6.0 from FI/CO view

    Hi Guys
    Can any one tell me key differences between 4.7 and ECC 6.0 from FI/CO view.
    In interview what i must tell?
    Thank you.

    Please visit the following links:
    [http://service.sap.com/erp]
    [http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)]
    [http://service.sap.com/instguides] --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
    [http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf]
    For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
    [http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/]
    After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
    Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
    Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
    Click on Search
    Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
    and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
    Regards,
    Ajit

  • Catalog views for ERP E-Commerce for MySAP ERP ECC 5.0

    We are implementing the R/3 version of CRM-ISA (ERP E-Commerce for MySAP ERP ECC 5.0).
    We need to implement product catalog views to allow filtering based on specific attributes.
    We have created a custom function module Z_ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE to replace ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE and  Z_ISA_CUSTOMER_READ_CAT_VIEWS to replace ISA_CUSTOMER_READ_CAT_VIEWS.
    But when we test from ISA the FM Z_ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE does not get invoked through RFC.
    There is an  SAP NOTE 998453 that we checked but it is still a pilot version.
    Has anyone implemented the catalog views without the notes? Can we do the catalog views without the note? If so, how can we meke custom FM work? Please advice.
    Thanks,
    VK

    Check the following.
    1. The XCM file modification-config.xml replaces both the function modules
    2. The checkbox to use the catalog views is checked for your webshop
    3. Catalog is published to TREX and you are using TREX catalog instead of Memory catalog.
    I don't think these notes work without TREX. I'd be interested in learning if anyone successfully implemented Catalog views with ECC ECO without using TREX.
    - Kishore

  • Tables not created during ERP ECC 5.0 installation

    hi guys,
    while installing SAP ERP ECC 5.0 on Oracle 9 i m getting following error message in SAPSSEXC.log file
    myCluster (3.2.Imp): 613: error when retrieving table description for physical table DOKCLU.
    myCluster (3.2.Imp): 614: return code received from nametab is 32
    myCluster (3.2.Imp): 296: error when retrieving physical nametab for table DOKCLU.
    (CNV) ERROR: code page conversion failed
                 rc = 2
    (DB) INFO: disconnected from DB
    D:\usr\sap\TX1\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: job finished with 1 error(s)
    D:\usr\sap\TX1\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: END OF LOG: 20070305232652
    regards,
    nasir

    IDES? what does this mean?
    could you plzz help me figure out the probelm from the log that i posted in the thread. its urgent.
    thanks and regards,
    nasir

  • Integration SCM (EWM) 7.01  to ERP ECC 6.0

    Hello,
    we are "trying" to integrate an SCM 7.0.1 to an ERP ECC 6.0.
    Material master data and goods received deliveries will be transfered from ERP to SCM sucessfull,
    but the quotation and the goods movement based on the purchase order  at ERP does not word.
    The system stops with an internal error :
    Interner Fehler SELECT_ASN_DATA AT_TMSTMP
    I tried to change the view V_TVLK_DL , but no change when i restart via SMQ2 the qrfc ...
    Internal error SELECT_ASN_DATA AT_TMSTMP
    Internal error SELECT_ASN_DATA AT_TMSTMP
    Inconsistency between parameters of the collected messages
    Because of previous error, dispatching is not possible for ID 0180001007
    Error during goods receipt posting
    Does anyone have the same problem in the beginning of the projekt, too ?
    Thanks you for any response.
    Kindly regards
    Ingo Meinschäfer

    Table / View : V_TVLK_DL
    Lieferart:       Bezeichnung :                      Template:
    BV     Barverkauf                             MIG DLV
    DIG     Anlief. Warenbeweg.
    DOG     Auslief. Warenbeweg.
    DTR     Umbuchung zentral
    EG     Grob-WE
    EL     Lieferavis                              MIG DLV
    HID     Anlief. HU Bewegung
    HOD     Auslief. WA-Bewegung
    HTP     Lief. für Umbuchung
    Possible entries for the template :
    template                                text
    ID HEADER TIMES       ID Anlieferung Standard Template
    MIG DLV                             WS Standard Template Lieferung
    MIG TRA                             WS Standard Template Transport
    SM STANDARD     QMEL       SM Standard Template Meldung
    WS STANDARD DEL       WS Standard Template Lieferung
    WS STANDARD TRA        WS Standard Template Transport
    Sorry, but i do not find a way to upload a hardcopy...
    Kindly regads
    Ingo

  • Difference Between 4.7 and ECC 5 /6 from SD Functional configur perspective

    Can any one tell me what are the difference between 4.7 EE and ECC 5 / 6 FROM SD Functional configuartion persective.

    Hi,
    For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.7  Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2004" or ECC 5.0
    or "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
    Select the Solution Area like Sales....
    Select module like SD.......
    Click on Search
    Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
    and also check the release notes of ECC 5.0 & ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
    Hope this helps you.
    Do award points if you found them useful.
    Regards
    Tushar
    P.S. Reward points if you find answer useful.

  • PO:Error in Process while transferring to backend (ECC 6.0) from SRM 5.0

    Hi folks,
    We are on an Extended Classic Scenario. We have a major problem occurring in Production system only for the the limit orders. Limit Orders are not getting transferred to ECC 6.0 from SRM (Error in Process clearly shows the non existence for PO created first time)
    I also know that Error in Process/ Transfer Failed status comes up for several causes.
    This was working fine for months together, suddenly this problem is coming up. 1 Week back we had a Patch Upgrade too. I have checked the Vendor data, Account Assignment and other Basic data too and everything looks fine. We have tried debugging the FM's on SRM side which transfers the PO(ex:BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC_V2)
    After debugging too we are not able to rectify from where the error is coming up..
    I need your valuable inputs on this.
    Thanks a lot in advance.

    Thanks a lot on your Key inputs Peter.
    I just forgot to mention one more thing, i.e., in RZ20 (SRM) we could see the following errors for limit orders:
    (01) PurchOrder 003....012: Transfer failed
    (02) PurchOrder 003....012: Please maintain services or limits
    (03) PurchOrder 003....012: Purchase order still contains faulty items
    (04) PO 003....012: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference
    To trace the issue backwards we tried creating a limit order PO directly from ECC backend (ME21N Transaction)
    One thing we could observe is in Limit tab if we not specify Expected Value and Overall Limit we are encountering the same error as shown up in RZ20.
    This gave us a vague idea that the price is not getting transferred for Limit Orders from SRM 5.0 to ECC 6.0 backend. Any key inputs on specific FM etc.,to debug and see what value is getting transferred from SRM to ECC would come handy.
    I hope Peter and others will help me on this.

  • Using ERP ECC 6.0 as BI

    Hi,
    Can we use our ERP ECC .6.0 as my BI server for Reporting needs of the ERP?
    If Yes
    1.What are the settings need to be done in ECC 6.0 .?
    2.What are the constraints of Using OLTP as OLAP?
    3.What is the Lanscape recommmed for best practices of BI Functionality?
    4. Will the ECC.60 ERP supply all the requirements for BI like IP, Open hub etc RDA.?
    Please help to solve the queries??
    Regards,
    dk

    1.What are the settings need to be done in ECC 6.0 .?
    Nothing much - you just have to have access to the tcodes like RSA1 etc... this is usually set by BASIS.
    2.What are the constraints of Using OLTP as OLAP?
    You are using the same DB for OLTP as well as OLAP - the database config remains the same across the systems. There might be issues with regard to DB configuration and performance / locking etc.
    3.What is the Lanscape recommmed for best practices of BI Functionality?
    Use the same as ECC
    4. Will the ECC.60 ERP supply all the requirements for BI like IP, Open hub etc RDA.?
    IP - yes ...
    Open Hub - sould be possible
    RDS - since the DB is the same - use real time data reporting using virtual infoproviders instead of RDA....
    One more thing is that you can look at doing more real time reporting off the ECC data since the DB is shared.
    Also you will have to configure the JAVA stack.

  • How to download ides ecc 6.0 from  internet

    hi guru,
    it's urgent how to download ides ecc 6.0 from net.
    regards
    subhasis.

    If you have a valid license you can download it from the SAP marketplace ( http://service.sap.com/ ), otherwise it's not available.
    Peter

  • Install ERP ECC 6.0 EHP4 with MSCS High Availability??

    Dear Expert:
    I need to Install ERP ECC 6.0 EHP4 with MSCS High Availability cluster.
    excpet the installation guide.
    is there any step by step document or guide could be reference??
    please give me the link or any infor.
    and....not quite sure what to do in the guide below:
    Nodes7.2.2Distribution of SAP System Components to Disks for MSCS
    When planning the MSCS installation, keep in mind that the cluster hardware has two different sets of disks:% ·4
    Local disks that are connected directly to the MSCS nodes% ·4
    Shared disks that can be accessed by all MSCS nodes via a shared interconnect
    NOTE
    Shared disk is a synonym for the MSCS resource of Resource type Physical disk.
    You need to install the SAP system components in both the following ways:% ·4
    Separately on all MSCS nodes to use the local storage on each node% ·4
    On the shared storage used in common by all MSCS nodes
    thank you very much for your help
    regards
    jack lee

    You can find installation documents at [http://service.sap.com/instguidesnw70]

  • SAP ERP ECC 6.0 PM configuration guide

    hi friends, i am working in a construction company and our compnay has implmented SAP ERP ECC 6.0. I am in PM module. I want to learn the configuration part. Please suggest me any gud link(ebook) in which i can find the detail configuration guidence about SAP PM module explaining the steps to configure the different parts for PM module including there need and other explantion

    Hi,
    I could find some data in this link (http://www.toodoc.com/sap-Pm-configuration-pdf.html)
    I would suggest you to through the configuration notes under each configuration in SPRO .. for better understanding..
    regards
    pushpa

  • Multi system scenario - ERP ECC 5.0 (or lower) - FSCM 6.0 Ehp4

    Dear colleagues,
    If you are dealing with a multisystem scenario, where ERP ECC is in versión (5.0 or lower) and your FSCM system is in 6.0 with Ehp4, can you take advantajes of the new functionalities released in Ehp2, Ehp3 and Ehp4? or is it mandatory to upgrade your ERP ECC system to 6.0?
    Kind regards.

    Hi Deep,
    I have confirmed this in Note 859995 - Upgrade to SAP Dispute Management 6.0 for FI AR
    "If your Accounts Receivable Accounting system is Release R/3 4.6C, note that SAP Dispute Management 6.0 does not offer any more up-to-date functions than SAP Dispute Management 3.0."
    This should apply for any landscape, one system scenario and two system scenario, right?

  • Call / trigger an ECC workflow step from PI ?

    Hi,
    For a flow "ext (file) -> PI -> ECC (workflow)", from PI, I need to run / execute / trigger () a workflow step in ECC, which already exist. I think that I can acheive this by creating an abap proxy in ECC in which I will call a Bapi or Method to run / execute / trigger () this workflow step. I don't know exactly how for the moment (in parallel I'm doing search about it), but that's not the matter.
    before to waste time by searching in this way, what's the best solution to call an ECC workflow step from PI ?
    Many thanks.
    Mickael
    (*) maybe I don't use the good terminology. Sorry.

    hi Shabarish,
    I'm confortable with web service, IDoc, RFC/bapi and abap proxy (and ...), but here, I prefer to use abap proxy (asynch + sxmb_moni in ecc) except if there is another better approach
    else as in PI we have ccBPM, so a workflow , as in ECC we have also workflow , does my approach (abap proxy & call method) is the good one ? or is there a better way between these two workflow tools: PI + ECC ? like a standard "workflow module" or a workflow "connexion" ? (I fear I know the answer but I would prefer to be sure),
    Note: I'm in PI 7.11 SP06 and ECC 6.0.
    Regards.
    Mickael

  • Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

    Issue Summary
    In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA.  We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20.  We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar.  The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
    RuleSet.xml Test
    Ruleset.xml
    1 
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    <ruleset version="1.0+">  
    <rule>
       <id location="*.javatester.org" />
       <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
    </rule>
    <ruleset version="1.0+">
    <rule>
       <id location="*.internaldomain.name" />
       <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
    </rule>
    </ruleset>
    Test 1 (Control)
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
    Test 2
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
    With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
    Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
    The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
    1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
    4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
    If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
    As a result:
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
    #2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
    #3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
    I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

    I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
    So here goes;
    I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
    When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
    The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
    When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
    UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
    In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
    Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
    This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
    "Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
    I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

Maybe you are looking for