Law 12741/ 2012 - "Lei de Transparência Fiscal"

Dears,
In Brazil, we have got a law 12741/ 2012 -> "Lei de Transparência Fiscal" and need to upload an excell from IBPT site to table z.
For that, has SAP note?
Thanks,

Similar Messages

Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2012.

Hello Experts,
While am tring to release a work order, i am getting the below error.
Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2012.
Message no. GP626
Diagnosis
The version 0 is not defined in controlling area DE06 for the fiscal year 2012.
You have to maintain the fiscal year-dependent version parameters for all actual versions for which multiple valuation is updated.
System Response
The version 0 cannot be used for fiscal year 2012.
Procedure
Maintain the fiscal year-dependent version parameters for the version 0.
Execute function
By this what i understood is we need to change the Settings for each fiscal year for the version 0 in controlling area DE06.
i.e. we need to add the fiscal year 2012 in that.
Is this correct????
If yes what will be the impact of adding 2012 in that screen?
i think its a soft config only.
Please let me know the correct process
Thanks in Advance,
Satya

Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2015.
What to do next ? Please help with it.

[MM] Transferência Planejada entre centros dentro da mesma filial.

Pessoal,
Boa noite!
Gostaria de uma ajuda num cenário de transferência planejada entre centros que estão sob a mesma filial.
Para manter a rastreabilidade do pedido que foi gerado por MRP, etc, foi mantido o cenário de transferência por SD. A transferência por SD está amarrada no tipo de pedido UB, que está amarrada em um documento de transferência, que está amarrado no tipo de movimento 863.
Como o movimento 863 é localizado, ele tem relevância fiscal, então programamos uma exit para modificar o código de imposto para A0 no momento de gerar a remessa.
Efetuamos a saída de mercadoria e quando vamos receber a mercadoria na transação MB0A, ele critica o movimento 861 pois não a remessa não possui nota fiscal. (Como estão dentro da mesma filial, ele não gera DOCNUM!!!)
Devido a essa crítica, tentei receber a remessa com outro tipo de movimento (Ex: 101) e não obtive sucesso.
Por acaso alguém pode me ajudar? Alguém sugere algum movimento que eu possa utilizar nesse cenário? Pq apesar do movimento estar amarrado eu posso tentar forçá-lo através da mesma exit que altera o código de imposto.
Fico no aguardo e desde já agradeço!
Obrigado.
Raphael Otsuka
(21)9866-6941

Pessoal, tenho um processo de transferencia MM/SD e o que ocorre e que na nota fiscal o valor esta saindo com preco embutido mais impostos.
Ex:
Alíquota de ICMS =7%
Quantidade: 36
Preço Material: 143,52
Calculo Qtd x Preço material = 36 x 143,52 = 5.166,72
Calculo Preço com ICMS embutido: 5.166,72 / 0,93 = 5.555,61
Nota Fiscal: 5.5561,61 X 7% = 388,89
A questao se o cliente nao quiser esse preço embutido, e quer ver na verdade o calculo dos 7% em cima do valor 5.166,72 que daria: 361,67
Como faco para que isso ocorra ? Alguem ja passou por isso ?
o fluxo do processo de transferencia ocorre da seguinte forma:
Pedido
Remessa ( onde temos a price)
Doc.material ( atraves dele chegamos a nota fiscal e seus valores com impostos embutido)
desde ja agradeço qq ajuda postada.
abracos

DVR Problem w/QIP7232P2 DVR Operation; HOW Long will I have to wait for 1.9.1?

THE SHORT PROBLEM:
1) DVR records only a few moments of pre-scheduled events then the recording stops with only 10 to 30 seconds stored content and this is reported in the on screen detail.
2) DVR records a full 1 hour show however, after 20 or so minuets of playback, use of the fast forward, skip (to get around a commercial) or pause DVR functions will cause the playback to jump to the end and you can't see the rest of the story. One must start the show over again, view stuff you have seen before to get to where the error happen. If you fast forward too close to the point of the error, you will get dumped out of the show all over again. Once you get close you just have to watch commercials and what you have seen before and then not use any DVR functions in order to watch the rest of the show.
3) DVR records a full 1 hour show, you fast forward to a time that is say 50% into the show, the progress bar will move forward like normal to show you get close to the point of you stopped watching the show before (to help solve problem #2 above) BUT, if you go too far, the progress bar will jump back to the start of the show and you may be dumped out of the program or it may continue to move forward. However the operation of the progress bar is not right.
This would render the DVR less then useful. Verizon has replaced my STB and talked me through the reset of AC power operation that is the normal fix for most STB issues. I'm told this will require a software upgrade from 1.9 to 1.9.1. OK, GET IT DONE and CREDIT USERS OF DVRs THE FEE PAID FOR SOMETHING THAT IS NOT WORKING.
THE LONG STORY WITH DETAILS:
All seemed to be well with the unit for a few months and the upgrade to the new 1.9 software looked like it went off without a hitch.
But.....Starting on around 12/17/11 I noticed that my DVR was recording only about 10 to 30 seconds of programming during scheduled events. Sometimes it would attempt to record the same event one or two times, each only lasting a few moments. I called Verizon customer service I think on 12/20/11 and they asked me to pull the 120 volt power and then re-apply power. This helped the problem but, remote testing seemed to show an issue and the customer rep decided a replacement unit was needed and Order No. MDDQ08V49U was created and another set-top box was shipped to me.
It is too bad that the technology has been developed to allow the external storage of digital content however, one can't back the 200 plus hours of video one may have stored on a set-top box and restore it on a new unit. It is also not possible to reproduce the vast extent of scheduling of events. No, it seems when you change out a set top box, all the programming is gone and you have to spend an afternoon coping down the schedule from the Series Manager and then re-enter all new events by making new recording events; a very time consuming operation.
So it is frustrating once after this afternoon is wasted reprogramming a new set-top is all done with the new set-top box installed, I find that on 1/5/12 when viewing recorded programming that should be one hour long, I only seem to get 22 minutes of playback. I try to look at this in detail and see that the first 22 minutes indeed play back in a normal manor. One is able to use the jump forward mode to skip over a commercial and all is good. If after 22 minutes you don't do anything, playback will continue to the end of the 1 hour. BUT, if after the first 22 minutes you try the skip or pause function, the program will jump to the end screen where you are given the option to: Program Options Page were you can select Play, Save until I delete, or Delete.
On 1/4/12 I called Tech Support and asked what to do about this 2nd box having yet another DVR problem. Once again I was asked to cycle the 120 volt AC power and disconnect and reconnect the coax "because electricity can build up in the set-top box". (I thought that was a cute reason). I asked the Customer Service rep if this was a Tier 2 or Tier 3 Troubleshooting method and she told me she was not authorized to tell me.
1/5/12 a Manager calls me back to follow up on a survey from the December service call and after seeing that I had a trouble ticket on 1/4 to see what is going on. He attempts to talk me into getting the on screen diagnostic screen to come up (press a mix of power and OK) but that just does not work like the old set-top box. We review the problem and he is not sure what else to do then send a Tech to the house to review the problems. He did tell me the STB I had in December WAS a known bad number; something about an issue with ribbon cable fault going to the hard drive. Well OK, but it seems ODD that the two like problems seem to happen to a known bad box and now to a new box that is not in the "bad" lot of numbers. This new STB also had been running 1.9 like the old STB for some number of weeks/months without issue then BANG, a problem pops up! It seems like this is a deeper problem but I trust with all the fact Verizon can find the right answer.
1/6/12 Aaron Phelps, Cable Splicing Technician comes to look at the problem. Nice guy! I show him the two recorded shows that have the problem. He can't get the on-screen diagnostic up but we use the test via the Main Menu and all readings seem OK. He also tests signals via an external meter with good results.
At last, he calls Tier 2 Tech support and I'm told by him that it seems some bug is in ver 1.9 and we will have to wait a month for a 1.9.1 to come out that should address a memory issue in the DVR. I don't know is this is the real story but Aaron tells me the ONLY fix they have is to swap out STB and he has no other 7232 units so... I'd have to go back to a smaller hard-drive or wait a month to see what happens.
To say again, it is a problem when the only answer in practice is to reboot the STB or replace it and this does not solve the problem. The field Techs don't know about a software bug less they call tier 2 support. Also, as it is so common to just replace the STB, the process may take only a moment in physical action to swap wires HOWEVER, it is an afternoon to get programming done so a new DVR is recording all the shows a Customer has established; on top of the time talking to phone Tech support and waiting for someone to show up to the home, that is a considerable investment in Consumer time. If you can't back up the content with the local drive due to copyright issues how about a cloud approach? I'd encourage a known bug to be resolved quickly and perhaps solve the manor that a STB is backed-up and replaced.
I learn on 1/6/12 my friend had like problems:
xxxxxx address blocked
Claire had the added problem that a pre set event she set to record change by an hour. I've not seen this but, I see in the Forum URL below, another person had the same problem as reported by "DC-Videophile" on 01-01-12 at 08:33 PM. On this same forum "rich3fan" reports problems that I have on 01-04-12 11:54 AM. The very bad news would seem from "markjrenna" 01-04-12 09:29 PM where it is suggested that 1.9.1 will not be out before 1Q12!!!! That is a long time to have this problem.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=21441579#post21441579
A Review of My Events W/ Problems:
I did not record when the problems happen in December
NCIS, channel 50, "Dog Tags" USA Recorded 1/5/2012 2:00 PM
NCIS, Los Angeles; 50, USA Recorded 1/4/2012 7:00 PM
NCIS, channel 50, "In the Zone" USA Recorded 1/6/2012 6:00 PM (after Tech visit to home)
I notice with this event, when you hit fast forward, the progress bar moves forward with time then at a point it goes back to the start point, even when good video is playing in fast forward. This program worked beyond 22 min then failed at maybe 38 min. When I tried again, it failed at another point earlier (maybe 15 min) so it does not have a pattern.
Leverage, channel 51, TNT, "The Gold Club" Recorded 1/7/2012 2:00 AM (after Tech visit to home)
The Best Thing I Ever Ate, channel 164 Food Network, "Bang for the Buck" Recorded 1/6/2012 7:30 PM
My Name Is Earl, channel 52 TBS, "Stole P's HD Cart", Recorded 1/7/2012 8:00 AM (after Tech visited to home)
NCIS, channel 50 USA,"Internal Affairs" Recorded 1/6/2012 5:00 PM (after Tech visit to home)
NCIS, channel 50 USA, "UnSEALed" Recorded 1/8/2012 11:00 AM (after Tech visit to home)
and a lot more.........

I am having the same problems. My guess is that a lot of people are having the same problems and just living with it. Those of us who know where to go on the Internet come here to find a fix.
It seems Verizon has some explaining to do. Maybe they should try Beta testing new software a little better. I would rather have to wait longer for something that works. I am sure that some manager or director said this is close enough, deploy it and we will see what happens. Well, you are seeing the problems. Time to fix your mistake.
All of us are telling our friends about the problems. The longer this goes on, the more people we will tell about it.
Wouldn't you rather us be telling our friends that their is an error in the new interface and that you are working hard to fix it?
If you want to be up front about this, then just tell us. We are adults and can handle it. If you made a mistake, own up to it and give us some credit for doing your Beta testing in the field.
Customer Service is all about telling the truth and if you made a mistake, admit it and lets move on with a fix. I do not want to be told again that I should be able to unplug it, power cycle it, try the on-board diagnostics, etc., etc.......
I am going to be repsonding on a daily basis to keep this topic at the top of the list.
Time to come clean. You will feel better Verizon.
Let's talk tomorrow.

NoFilter vs Previous Year

Hi All,
I am new to BO/WEBI and I am facing an issue with a simple cost center report. My plan is to build a report with following structure
Cost element │ Act. Month │ Plan Month │ Budget Full Year Current │ Budget Full Year Previous Year │
and I am using following input controls
Cost center (Single value)
Fiscal Year/period (Single value)
The columns contains following:
Cost element: The Dimension “Cost element”
Act. Month: The measure “Amount actual”
Plan Month: The measure “Amount plan”
Budget Full Year Current: The formula “Plan Total - Current year”
Budget Full Year Previous: The formula “Plan Total - Previous year”
The two formulas is made as below
Plan Total - Current year:
=NoFilter(Sum([Amount Plan])) Where ([Cost Center]=ReportFilter([Cost Center]) And [Fiscal year]=[Current year] And [Version]="Plan/actual version")
([Current year] = Right([Fiscal year/period].[Fiscal year/period - Key];4) (I would have used Reportfilter, but for some reason it gives me all the values)
Plan Total - Previous year
=NoFilter(Sum([Amount Plan])) Where ([Cost Center]=ReportFilter([Cost Center]) And [Fiscal year]=[Previous Year] And [Version]="Plan/actual version")
[Previous Year] = Left(Right([Fiscal year/period].[Fiscal year/period - Key];4);2)+ If(Right(ReportFilter([Fiscal year/period]);4)="2012";"11";If(Right(ReportFilter([Fiscal year/period]);4)="2013";"12";"13"))
Now I am facing following issues
The column “Budget Full Year Previous Year” is blank (properly due to a #Multivalue-issue). How do I fix this?
Is there a smarter way to find “Budget Full Year Current” and “Budget Full Year Previous”
The column “Plan Total - Current year” is working, but this is properly because the variable choose all the year and the Input control filters the right year
Thanks in advance
Peter

Hi Gill
Yes I am using Bex as my data source. I have asked IT to make the selection within Bex, but it created some new issues
IT made a measure for Budget Full Year Previous, which was based on Current year - 1. Unfortunately this only worked if the users choose this year (2014) and the Budget Full Year Previous would then be 2013. If the user select fx August 2013 the Budget Full Year Previous will again be 2013
As an alternative IT suggested the selection should be in a prompt on the query. This could maybe work, but my report is quite slow so the user has to wait approx 2½ min each they change period.
Thanks for reply
Peter

Asset: Error of Year End Closing and depreciation

Experts,
We are testing a scenerio in Quality Server. System was throwing error " You Can not post to asset in Company Code ABCD, fiscal year 2012". So we performed Fiscal year change "T-Code: AJRW"
Now we have created asset in Year 2011, then posted Acquisition through "ABZON"
then in "AFAB" depreciation run for the period 01 is successfuly done (we can see in SCMO)
but for period 02 error is "Fiscal year 2011 is already closed in Financial Accounting."
we need to check depreciation on the test asset created and then try the partial transfer of asset to various subassets in percentage. and then again check the effect of depreciation.
How should we go ahead? what steps need to be performed?
please help...
- Nilesh

Hi Nilesh,
The error message you get implies that FI is closed for period 02, 2011. Check transaction OB52 for your company code and variant, whether the posting period in FI is indeed open.
Regards,
Brigitte

How to display only four last quarters

Happy New Year to all of you!
I have a data-set with two variable: Fiscal Year (FY 2011, FY 2012, ...) and Fiscal Quarter (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4).
This data-set will be updated every quarter, and I want to make a table only display the four last quarters to use in the dashboard.
Is there any way to do that?
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
HB

you could create a flag in your time-dimension like "WithinLast4Quarters"
then you use this Flag and filter on WithinLast4Quarters=True in your PivotTable or Report
hth,
gerhard
Gerhard Brueckl
blogging @ http://blog.gbrueckl.at
working @ http://www.pmOne.com

Tds Limit

Hi,
We have implemented ECC 5.0 . Our company is in India . In India there is one statutory requirement regarding TDS. Tds Calculate as per section code and in that there is limit for deducting surcharge .
Example : - In India For Contractor limit is 20,000 Inr , If contractor invoices do not cross these limit then sap has to deduct only "Basic + E.cess"
But If contractor invoices cross these limit then system has to deduct surcharge on all invoices ( means before cross invoices)If I have to deduct surcharge on that invoice and onwards invoice then I can do this . also this process is manual.
system don't give any TDS Limit for duducting surcharge.
I cant deduct surchage on back invoices...
Regards,
Kaushal Shah
+91 9924756365

Hi Kaushal
I think there is a misconception in this regard. The law actually states that if in a fiscal year, the total payments to a contractor does not exceed Rs.20,000/-, then NO TDS has to be deducted. and any payment together over and above Rs.20,000/- in one fiscal year attracts TDS.
Regarding surcharge, it is applicable only if the following is satisfied,
1. in case of individuals/HUF, applicable only if payment exceeds Rs.10,00,000/-
2. in case of Partnership firms / companies, surcharge applicable only if payment exceeds Rs.1,00,00,000.
Kindly make a not of this. Being a Chartered Accountant, this is my duty to clarify on the basic matters relating to statutes and their interpretation.
And in SAP, there is no such process by which u can automate this. it has to be manually done for each and every vendor. u cannot set the limits in the system at all.
Regards,
CA. Karthik Narayan N S
SAP-FICO Consultant

After CO month end -- Need to solve quickly

Dear all,
We have a scenario in sales order costing with sale order is cost object with valuated stock
Major issue is after running month end in CO, client is checking a Z-report which is developed for cost of sales
In this report client is checking profit and loss statement for the month of JAN 2012 which should show net profit of SAR 2 million instead of current net loss of SAR 4 million for the sales of SAR 9 million.
The major problam lies with inventry change in account whic is showing negative balance of SAR 7 million in the profit and loss account.
When I checked WIP in KKAO system is showing WIP(cumulative is zero) and WIP ( period ) is showing negative balance..
For the some of the orders I am still able see the amount with negative sign in the WIP ( period ) column of the report after order status as delivered..
In the Z-report system is showing change in inventry account amount as (7 millions)..
WIP calculation is at actual cost
Scenario:
Client create sales order only for make order no stock..
Production order are created with reference to sale order..
For each production there will multiple production orders in a single header production order
Some times client is issuing materials at header order directly instead of each order level..
some times issuing only material with no actual activies and taking GR from order then it flows to header order..
Please provide your valueble inputs as it is very urgent for the client..
Thanks,
Janki

Dear All,
Can any one please provide valuable inputs for the issue.
My major concers is after order has delivered status in NOV 20111, still I am able to see negative balance in the current period Jan 2012 (G/L account is change in inventry p&l account having negative balance)
User completed month end for the month of Jan 2012 (1st period for the fiscal 2012).
The G/L account is causing major damage for the profit and loss account.
Please help..
Thanks,
Janaki

Nota fiscal rejeitada por campos 'pMVAST, pRedBCST, vBCST' vazios no processo de transferência de crédito de ICMS

Pessoal, bom dia!
Vejam se alguém já passou por algo parecido em algum projeto...
Estou com uma demanda pra alterar alguns parametros do processo de transferência de crédito de ICMS, que são:
1- A quantidade deverá ser preenchida com “0”.
2- O valor unitário deve ser “0”.
3- O campo de unidade de medida “Vazio”
4- A NCM não deverá ser vazia, mas ser preenchida com “00”.
5- O CST deverá ser “090”.
A solução para os pontos 1, 2 e 3 foi criar um enhancement na função J_1B_NFE_PROCESS_OUTBOUND relacionada a J1B1N para alterar os valores digitados pelo usuário assim que a nota estiver sendo criada. Para o ponto 4, a solução foi criar um NCM "00" para utilização do usuário.
E, no ponto 5, a solução foi orientar o usuário a optar pela origem do material "0" e optar pelo direito fiscal IC9 (Outros) que atribuirá a tributação 90, formando assim o 090 esperado.
O problema é:
Ao dar saída na nota fiscal pela J1B3N, ela está sendo rejeitada pelo fato dos campos 'pMVAST (Percentual da margem de valor Adicionado do ICMS ST), pRedBCST (Percentual da Redução de BC do ICMS ST), vBCST' (Valor da BC do ICMS ST) não estarem sendo preenchidos.
Sendo assim, como posso resolver esse ponto?
Em anexo está a tela do preenchimento da Writer com os devidos parametros e impostos, e está também o IDOC que foi gerado com os campos em branco.
Desde já agradeço a atenção.

Allan, boa tarde!
Obrigado pela sua resposta, mas, conforme venho conversando com o fiscal resposável do projeto, o cenário é esse mesmo.
Seguem abaixo e em anexo as regras Fiscais para emissão da nota de transferência de crédito de ICMS:
Orientação de Preenchimento NF-e:
Transferência de crédito
A nota fiscal eletrônica (NF-e) também será emitida nas hipóteses de transferências de crédito acumulado de ICMS em razão de exportação, diferimento ou redução da base de cálculo.
De acordo com a legislação, há regras a serem observadas para a emissão da NF-e referente a essa transferência de crédito. Resumidamente, alguns procedimentos comuns que poderão ser seguidos.
Para emitir a NF-e, é necessário informar nos campos próprios:
1. Como destinatário, o nome, o endereço e os números de inscrição estadual e no Cadastro Nacional de Pessoa Jurídica (CNPJ) do contribuinte ao qual se está efetuando a transferência;
2. Nas Informações Complementares do quadro “Dados Adicionais”, a expressão “Transferência de crédito acumulado de ICMS, nos termos (indicar o base legal da transferência)” e o valor, por extenso, do crédito transferido. No aplicativo gratuito emissor da NF-e, essa informação constará no campo “Informações Complementares de interesse do contribuinte” da aba “Informações Adicionais”;
3. No local destinado ao valor da operação do quadro “Cálculo do Imposto”, o valor do crédito acumulado transferido (no aplicativo gratuito de NF-e, esse valor será informado no Valor Total bruto). Nos demais campos, preencher com “0” (zero) para todos locais numéricos e obrigatórios nos quais não consta orientação específica - apenas um dígito “0” em cada, pois a NF-e trabalha com campo preenchido;
4. Como natureza da operação: “Transferência de Crédito Acumulado de ICMS”;
5. No campo “Finalidade de emissão” informar “NF-e de Ajuste”;
6. Os CFOP e CST serão os códigos 5.601/5.602 e 090, respectivamente;
7. A Nomenclatura Comum do MERCOSUL (NCM) será informada a expressão numérica “00”;
8. A “Descrição do Produto” será informada a expressão “Transferência de Crédito Acumulado de ICMS”;
9. A situação tributária do PIS e da COFINS será “Operação sem incidência da Contribuição; e
10. A “Modalidade do frete” indicar “Sem frete”.
8. Código de Situação Tributária – informar “90”. Página 168 do Manual de Integração.
Na Nota Técnica 2013/005, ainda é informado que os campos 'pMVAST, pRedBCST e vBCST' devem ser carregados no XML, e por se tratar de tranferência de crédito, os valores devem ser “zerados”.
Aplicando o imposto ICS3, consigo inserir zeros nos campos indicados acima. O problema é que a NF é rejeitada novamente só que com erro no campo vBCSTRet (Valor da BC do ICMS ST retido), pois ao zerar os campos acima acabo obrigatoriamente atribuindo zero ao campo vBCSTRet, fato que não deve ocorrer.

Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012

I am getting this error while scheduling infopackage for 2lis_02_HDR.
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012
PLease let me know how to solve thhe issue.
Thanks,
harika.

Hi,
Where are you geting error, before execution or duing execution of DTP in the log.
Check if you have transferred fiscal year variants from source system to BW. Then trigger DTP.
Regards,
Pravin Karkhanis.
Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM
Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM

Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 when loadin

Dear Experts,
We are working on BI7.0 extracting data from ECC 6.0.
I am trying to load data from 0HR_PY_PP_1 which is a Self DataSource in our BW System (extracts data from 0EMPLOYEE and 0PERSON) to load into ZPA_C50 which is a copy of BCT InfoCube 0PAPA_C02 (Headcount).
The data has come through into the PSA very well.
However, DTP is throwing an error while loading 32242 records of data from PSA into ZPA_C50 InfoCube. The error details as below:
Error while updating to target ZPA_C50 (type INFOCUBE)
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 FGV 2
Messages for 1 data records saved; request is red acc. to configuration
Processing Terminated
We are actually doing a Re-implementation of BW 3.0b in BI 7.0 Ehp1. We have imported Maintenance of Fiscal Year Variant from the BW 3.0b Production System. So this shouldn't be a problem I guess since I have also checked the setting in SPRO in BI 7.0 Development (New) System and they are looking good.
Also, when I do a Filter on 0CALDAY in DTP from 01.01.1900 to 31.12.2010, the loads are working fine. I want the load to run without any Filters on 0CALDAY.
Has anyone been in similar situation. How did you resolve this issue? Your time is very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Chandu

Dear Experts
Thanks for your time.
We have resolved this issue ourselves. We have maintained 'Shortened Fiscal Years' for 'Z1' and it is working fine now. Steps are as below:
In BI Dev System -> SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG -> SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -> SAP NetWeaver -> Business Intelligence -> General BI Settings -> Maintain fiscal year variant -> Select 'Z1' Fiscal Year Variant and then DoubleClick on 'Shortened Fiscal Years' to set the Fisc Year Variant -> Save.
The dataload should work fine now.
Cheers,
Chandu

Issue with Fiscal Year Varient Period modifications for 2012

Hi All,
Can you please advice how the Fiscal Year Varient modified periods be transported to different clients.
The issue is, we have 2012 Periods already setup in DEV and transported to QAS and PRD, now the clinet came up with different periods for 2012. I have modified the periods as requested and captured them in transport.
When the new transport was sent to QAS, the new periods are appended to the old periods, instead of replacing the old periods.
any help is much appreaciated.
Thanks
Shasha

Hi All,
My issue has been resolved, we figured out that we need to delete the existing calender and capture that in transport and then recreate the calender for 2012 with new periods and capture this in the same transport and this works.
Instead of deleting the existing calender we changed the values before, which is the reason it was appedning the previous periods and the new periods.
Thanks
Smitha

Windows Server 2012: SMB share with transparent failover

Have a nice day to all!
I have 2 HP Proliant DL380P Gen8 servers containing 8 x 1TB disks (with P420i HP Smart Array RAID Controller) in each server.
So, there are 2 arrays on every server:
1. 2 x 1TB in RAID1 (+1 disk for hot swap) - system volume
2. 5 x 1TB in RAID5 (+1 disk for hot swap) - data volume
And I installed Windows Server 2012 Standard on each server.
Than I created a failover two-nodes cluster.
And now I want to create a SMB share with transparent failover for all the second (data) volume (it's about 3.3TB in RAID5 array). How just can I reach this goal? I'm going to use it in future for Hyper-V VMs, so, the main reqirement is powered-on and working
VMs even if one node of SMB share cluster is failed.
I wasn't able to see my volumes in failover cluster manager. I tried to create iSCSI targets, storage pools, virtual disks, etc. but no luck. My failover cluster manager can't see it to create SMB share!
Can anyone advice me something?
Thanks in advance!

Have a nice day to all!
I have 2 HP Proliant DL380P Gen8 servers containing 8 x 1TB disks (with P420i HP Smart Array RAID Controller) in each server.
So, there are 2 arrays on every server:
1. 2 x 1TB in RAID1 (+1 disk for hot swap) - system volume
2. 5 x 1TB in RAID5 (+1 disk for hot swap) - data volume
And I installed Windows Server 2012 Standard on each server.
Than I created a failover two-nodes cluster.
And now I want to create a SMB share with transparent failover for all the second (data) volume (it's about 3.3TB in RAID5 array). How just can I reach this goal? I'm going to use it in future for Hyper-V VMs, so, the main reqirement is powered-on and working
VMs even if one node of SMB share cluster is failed.
I wasn't able to see my volumes in failover cluster manager. I tried to create iSCSI targets, storage pools, virtual disks, etc. but no luck. My failover cluster manager can't see it to create SMB share!
Can anyone advice me something?
Thanks in advance!
You need to have your storage you want to export as being a shared storage visible to your cluster (part of CSV). Then you'll configure failover file shares using content accessible from both cluster nodes. Refer to this manual for diagrams (ignore StarWind
and replace it logically with your existing shared storage you've used to create your cluster):
http://www.starwindsoftware.com/configuring-ha-file-server-on-windows-server-2012-for-smb-nas
Also see these manuals from MS on how to create failover file server:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753969.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731844(v=ws.10).aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2010/08/19/working-with-file-shares-in-windows-server-2008-r2-failover-clusters.aspx
However if you want to use existing storage located on the both nodes you're out of luck. Microsoft does not provide anything representing local DAS to the cluster nodes. If you want to use existing DAS then you'll have to stick with a third-party product
like StarWind, SteelEye or DataCore. To create something like in this picture:
So you'll have a configuration with only two nodes, no physical shared hardware (SAS JBOD, FC or iSCSI) and vSAN. Refer to this manual:
http://www.starwindsoftware.com/ns-configuring-ha-file-server-for-smb-nas
Hope this helped :)
StarWind iSCSI SAN & NAS

There is a new Swiss consumer law, giving guarantee for a product for 2 years. Is this law retroactive from Jan 2012 or it is valid from Jan 2013 onwards?

Hello,
My iphone's wi-fi is broken. One year guarantee period is over.
The new Swiss consumer protection law forces the seller (not apple) to gurantee for two years. Is this new law retroactive since Jan 2012 or it is valid from Jan 2013?

I'm sorry, you seem to have mistaken this user to user technical support forum for a room full of lawyers...
Call an attorney or contact the Swiss consumer protection agency and ask.
For what it's worth, almost no law can be made retroactive in any civilized country.

Law 12741/ 2012 - "Lei de Transparência Fiscal"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for