LAyer 3 to Layer 3 LWAPP Transport mode

Has anyone moved from layer 2 to Layer 3 transport mode?
I want to see if it is easy as changing the transport mode on the 4124 controller and assigning an IP address to the AP.
Thanks!

Pretty much it's that easy. You will also have a new interface on the controller after it reboots. The interface will be an AP-Manager. You need to assign this interface an address in the same subnet as the Management interface. After that, you will also need to either set an IP address on the AP's and specify the system name of the primary controller, or setup a DHCP scope for them, and specify the Option 43/60 so the AP can find the controller.
Here is the link to the Upgrade guide that references the option 43 information.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_technical_reference09186a00804fc3dc.html#wp125304
Also, the document is a bit lacking, it does not tell you what the VCI strings should be for all of the AP's, so here they are.
Airespace/Cisco 1200/1000
Airespace.AP1200
Cisco 1200/1230
Cisco AP c1200
Cisco 1240
Cisco AP c1240
Cisco 1130
Cisco AP c1130
Let us know if you need any more assitance.
Here is another document, that is a little more tuned towards an IOS DHCP server, and it does have the VCI for all the AP's.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6548/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a00807158ec.html

Similar Messages

  • Layer 3 LWAPP problems

    large pings fail over Layer 3 LWAPP when RAP's are connected over WAN (Internet)
    also cannot browse sites etc.
    The RAP's join and clients can get IP adress from DHCP server, but cannot ping over 1399b to default gateway.
    Layer2 seems OK - 10-20ms latency
    tested on 4.0.179.11, 4.0.209, 4.1.171
    using 1242, and/or 1510's
    40-70ms Latency to Wism from AP.
    Any Ideas

    Try pinging 3 or 4 times. If it works fine then try upgrading to 802.11 g technology and also take care of number of users sharing the network.

  • WLC Guidelines L3 Transport Mode and functionality

    Hi,
    I'm implementing a LWAPP Solution and I would like to have some confirmation about LWAPP solution
    If I understand right all the traffic from the WLAN client have to pass through the dynamic interface of the controller and there are no
    opportunity to configure it in another way...
    Best Practises suggest that LWAPP AP should be placed in a different VLAN (IP Subnet) from the LWAPP WLAN client and to use LWAPP L3 Transport Mode...
    Which are the drawback if I put the LWAPP APs on the same VLAN(IP Subnet) as the LWAPP APs? If I implement the solution in this way I can still configure
    LWAPP L3 transport Mode or it isn't working???
    Thanks for sharing your opinion

    Actually, Layer 2 LWAPP mode is considered depreciated by Cisco. Also, only 4400 controllers support Layer-2 LWAPP discovery. 2000 series WLCs doesn't.
    The reason why Layer-3 LWAPP is preferable than Layer-2 LWAPP is "Layer-3 LWAPP discovery involves a series of steps in its algorithm and finds the candidate list of controller in different ways like DHCP option43, OTAP, DNA etc..,
    Layer-2 LWAPP discovery just uses one method of controller discovery that is by using layer-2 broadcast in a LWAPP frame. Since, layer-3 lwapp uses a series of controller discovery methods, it is more secured and reliabel than layer-2 LWAPP mode.

  • IPSEC transport mode and GET VPN

    All,
    I am about to implement GET VPN while read the following from Cisco's website:
    IPsec transport mode suffers from fragmentation and reassembly limitations and must not be used in
    deployments where encrypted or clear packets might require fragmentation.
    I just do not understand why transport mode will suffer fragmentation and reassembly while it had less overhead than tunnel mode.

    One thing to understand about Tran sport mode vs Tunnel mode (ipsec) is thst Transport is used between acyual source and destination of the ip protocol
    Tunnel mode actually not only authenticates but also encrypts at the higher layers of the pckt
    Pix
    VPN
    IP layers
    Tunnel actual source and destination is encrypted at the upper layers and therefor when the packet gets to the IP Layer, it really doesnt know about or care about the iCV signature already withinh the upper PIX layer.
    Also from a security standpoint because of the fact that tunnel mode encrpyts and authenticated the ip infoemation whereas transport only authenticates packets

  • Can't get Transport Mode to Work

    Just messing around in a lab with a few routers. Trying to bring up transport mode first on an IPSEC tunnel. All seems correct, but it constantly comes up in Tunnel Mode. I can't see why?
    Can anyone see anything obvious?
    Enclosed are configs and a WireShark capture of the output - as you can see it's Tunnel Mode - and not Transport.
    The output of "show crypto ipsec sa" demonstrates the fact that its Tunnel mode.

    Thanks for the reply Rick.
    The access list is a catch-all :-
    access-list 100 permit ip any any
    It's a strange one to grasp really.
    "traffic to be protected has the same IP addresses as the IPSec peers "
    My routers are peers - 192.168.1.1 & 192.168.1.2
    If i ping from .1 to .2, or .2 to .1, in my mind this represented "the same IP addresses as the IPSEC peers". Other than the ping, i don't know how i can simulate peer traffic that would come up in transport mode. Do you?
    Once the IPSEC link is built, and it's a tunnel link, i don't think it will ever divert away from this and create a separate transport mode link, so all traffic will ride across it.
    It's not a big deal i suppose. Router to router connections don't seem to support transport mode.
    I know how the packets would look like, which is the most important thing really. The headers are just in different positions.
    Thanks again for taking the time to answer Rick.

  • Importing content: transport modes 'all', 'data'

    I try to import *.epa file and get error for evere entity in package:
    PcdGlTransportManager.importObject(): cannot import an object in transport mode all that has been exported with transport mode data.
    It seems the thing is in transport mode. How to change it?

    Hi Denis,
    I am facing same problem whiile importing BP for ESS & MSS (ERP 2005NW04s) into EP NW04(6.0 sp14).
    Either i can modify all .properties files as suggested by you or we can upgrade EP to 04s (7.0).
    Did you face any problem after modifying all 'data' to 'all'; is it working fine?
    Subhash

  • IPSec (transport mode) load balancing via CSM

    Suppouse that there is two servers providing service for remote aplications. Those aplications using IPSEC in transport mode. I would like to put at front CSM to load-balance beetwen both of them (persist via SRC IP is ok for me).
    Have you any expirience with transort mode? IMHO it is not possible becouse of ip header changes? (I have no exact informatin that resign from AH transforms are possible)
    What when changing to tunnel mode. Have you ever seen that configuraion working?

    I think you can for the transport mode. I have not had any luck with the Tunnel mode.

  • Transportation mode from Sea to Air(AFS route determination)?

    Dear Gurus,
    1. PO is created and the ex-factory date in PO is 19th Dec 2010 and
    2. Delivery date in PO is 27th Jan 2011 and now, the transportation mode is by default coming as ZS(Sea) through AFS route determination process.Now, user is trying to change the transportation mode(ME22N txn) from ZS(Sea) to ZA(Air), it does not change always and if it does some time,
    3. then the transportation mode will again restores back to ZS but the
    4. planed delivery time changes to ZA value thereby causing Inconsistency between transportation mode and its value.
    Please help to solve this issue ASAP.

    thanks...

  • PTP Transport mode

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to configure the PTP on the ASR9001 and I'd like to use the transport mode ETHERNET instead of IPv4.
    From the RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9001-2#show ptp interfaces  it look likes that the Ethernet capability is not supported:
    TenGigE0/0/1/1 is in Master state
      PTP port number: 1
      IPv4 transport: IPv4 address 10.85.52.5
      Linestate: Up
      Mechanism: Two-step delay-request-response
      Sync rate: every second
      Announce rate: every 2 seconds, timeout 3 intervals
      Min Delay-Request rate: every second
      CoS: General 6, Event 6, DSCP: General 46, Event 46
      Platform capabilities:
        Supported:     One-step, Two-step, IPv4, Unicast, Master, Slave
        Not-supported: Ethernet, Multicast, IPv6, Source IP
        Max-Sync-rate: 128 per second
      Master state only
      0 Unicast peers
    Can you please support me?
    thanks in advance.
    BR// Saverio

    Here is a good doc on that:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_white_paper09186a0080901caa.shtml

  • IPSEC ESP SECURITY PROTOCOL IN TUNNEL & TRANSPORT MODE

    My query is that who much IP Pachet is
    added/expanded in following two case.
    1. ESP IN TRANSPORT MODE.
    2. ESP IN TUNNEL MODE

    Transport mode: 37 bytes 3DES or 63 bytes AES
    Tunnel mode 57 bytes 3 DES or 83 bytes AES
    M.
    Hope that helps, rate if it does

  • IPsec transport mode with IPv6?

    I am trying to set up IPsec in a IPv6 environment. However, when I configure "crypto map" I wasn't able to "set peer" to a IPv6 peer address. Why is that?
    I used Virtual Tunnel Interface instead of Crypto Map and it worked. But I need to IPsec in transport mode instead of tunnel mode.

    I think here is no support for mixed mode which is ipv6 traffic through ipv4 tunnel and vice versa in VTI . Better solution is Gre tunnel.

  • IPSec Transport Mode

    Hi,
    I am trying to setup an IPSec transport mode policy from my test server in the office to a VM in Azure in order to replicate data to a RODC.
    Both servers sit behind a NAT firewall and have private IP addresses.
    I have created a security policy at each end which specifies both the private address of the server and the public address of the cloud service (Azure) and firewall (On Prem)
    I have opened firewall ports on both sides to allow both 500/udp and 4500/udp
    Using the Network Monitor tool, I can see some IKE transmissions but I can't ping/rdp either way.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks
    Dave

    Hi Dave,
    We've not heard from you yet. I assume the information provided by me has helped. I am marking my reply as answered now.
    In case the information did not help, please feel free to unmark the answer and come back to us with your comments.
    Best regards.
    Steven Lee
    TechNet Community Support

  • Additional Transportation mode on Traval Request form

    Hi all,
    Can we add more transportation modes (in request transportation/accommodation) on travel request form on SAP R/3!
    i.e.  Employee can request for company pool car but currently flight, train, rental car options are available on travel request form.
    Awaiting for responses!

    Hi Raynard Coscolluela,
    Thanks for your response.
    but where i have to activate additional services on travel request form..
    if it is in schema (t-code FITVFELD) there which node i have to activate ?
    Thanks in advance for your time!

  • [TP Transport Mode] Set to 'data_and_acl' by default

    Hi,
    Is this possible to change the standard customizing that makes 'data' as the default entry for the Transport Mode of newly created Transport Packages ?
    Why is this 'data' by default? I don't see much interest for this or am I missing something ??
    Thanks in advance for your answer.
    Best regards,
    Guillaume

    Hi Guillaume,
    In previous version there was only one option ( so i guess backwards compatible).
    If you really would like to adjust this, find out which portal application takes control for transport. Download it, adjust the default setting (probably in the portalapp.xml) and upload it.
    But I would strongly suggest: just click the data_and_acl option. Changing these minor this is not recommended!
    Another option is to create a 'template transport package'. If you need a new transport, copy the template, change name / description and add the appropriate objects to it.
    Cheers,
    Noël Hendrikx

  • Changing the layer colour in Isolation Mode

    How do I change the layer colour once I'm in Isolation Mode? I'm using CS4 and tring to edit a yellow object but Illustrator has made the layer/paths/edges yellow making it VERY difficult to see what I'm doing?
    ...actually, I just changed the objects layer to a differrent colour which seems to have made Illustator select the next colour down when in Isolation made.
    Is this my only option?

    I decided to test this more thoroughly.
    Elements edited in Isolation Mode do actually inherit the color of the parent layer.
    But there seems to be an exception: symbols. No matter what color the layer is, symbols edited in Isolation Mode get their own color. And that color is persistent across all symbols, regardless of the layer that they appear on.
    However, that color is not consistent throughout the lifespan of the document. The color changes according to a pattern.
    And the pattern is this: there is a sequential list of layer colors in AI, and a correlation  between the number of layers in your document and the sequential number of the colors in the Layer Options color list. Symbols always use the color that is next in the list of layer colors, following the pre-assigned color of the most recently-created layer.
    Test this out if you want:
    Create a new document. Note that the default layer always uses the "light blue" layer color.
    Now create a second layer in that document. It will be red.
    The third layer will be green, and the fourth will be blue.
    Now make a symbol and edit it in Isolation Mode. It's yellow.
    Now look at the sequence of colors in the layer color dropdown menu: "yellow" is fifth in the list, after "blue," the fourth color in the list. It seems like AI is creating a new temporary layer for editing symbols, and like other layers, it is automatically assigned a color.
    So basically, symbols edited in Isolation Mode will only be yellow if you have four layers. The way that AI assigns colors to symbols being edited in  Isolation Mode seems to depend on the number of layers in the document.
    If you followed the steps above, you can test this out by creating a fifth layer. Notice that it automatically gets assigned a layer color of yellow. Edited symbols will be magenta... the sixth color in the list.
    It doesn't matter if you change the colors of each layer after creating  them; as far as I can tell, if you have four layers, symbols edited in Isolation Mode will always be yellow.
    The workaround would be to add a fifth layer to your document. Symbols in Isolation Mode will then show up in magenta, which is much easier to see on a white background.

Maybe you are looking for