Layer via Copy, Free Transform, Multiple Layers, Doesnt work?

Hello,
I am using Adobe Photoshop CS6, latest version as of 05/25/12
I have 19 layers, each has a 1200x1200px texture. These are of course overlapped, so setting them all to visible will only show the top layer.
All layers are rasterized, and contain 1200x1200px:
1) I select all 19 layers using shift+click, all are highlighted (in the layer pane).
2) I select a region using the selection tool, in this case a rectangular region that is 172px high and 35px wide.
3) I right click the selection, and then select: layer via copy. (Note, Layer via cut is disabled for some reason)
4) *problem* It creates 19 new layers with the full image from the selected layers and not the selection which is what I wanted to place in the new layers.
5) *problem* when I right click the selection and select "Free Transform", the transform box surrounds the entire canvas and not the selection.
6) *problem* when I skew, it skews the entire image and not just the selection.
7) *problem* Previously, I have been able to select a layer from the layer pane, go to image menu, select adjustments, brightness/contrast, and adjust the brightness/contrast for just that layer. Now it wont let me.
8) *related problem* If I have 3 layers (background, 1, and 2) on a 1200x1200 canvas, with the image in layer 1 being 150px, and the image in layer 2 being 150x, each rasterized, and then stack the images on 1 and 2 over eachother, then select both layers, then select a region inside the stacked images, then select free transform, the free transform selection embodies all pixels inside the canvas (not the entire canvas this time) and performs the transform on these pixels and not the original selection.
If I do it making all the layers visible as well as selected, it behaves the same.
What appears to be happening is Photoshop is ignoring the selection and for some reason is using a pixel region (or if pixels cover the entire canvas, the whole image) when performing actions intended for the selection.
What's strange is when I made these textures, I started out with 19 150x150 pictures, I set the canvas size to 1200x1200, selected all the layers in the layer pane, selected the 150x150 image in the middle, and was able to move all 19 textures to the top right corner, able to switch to transform on all 19 pictures, able to rotate 180 degrees all 19 pictures, was able to flip horizontal all 19 pictures, then able to copy all 19 pictures to new layers, move the 19 pictures all at the same time to the right 150 pixels, rinse and repeat, to eventually come out with 19 1200x1200 textures tiled from the 150px pictures. In other words, I did exactly what I am attempting to do with the 1200x1200 pictures with the 150x150 pixtures and it worked like a champ.
Something has changed, maybe an option somewhere got clicked, something. I don't know.
The end goal of course is to take a selection of all 19 of the 1200x1200 pictures, transform, then skew that image to make a collage of images applied to an added background. Performing this on all 19 textures and getting the same exact skew, etc would take days considering I need to do about 15 of different portions of the tile.
Need some help here... is there an option somewhere that makes photoshop ignore the selection and perform the actions on all the images?
Best regards,
Dustin

Just ran into this problem today Dustin. You can only create new layers via copy from one layer. What I ended up having to do is copy all of my images that were on different layers. Then I merged them. Select all the images you copied>Layer>Merge. So now I have two copies of artwork on the same canvas. One that is all different layers and one that is now one layer.  Then I was able to select the portions of the new merged layer I wanted and create new layers via copy. Then I erased the extra, merged layer.
You don't have to copy your initial images. I just did in case I wanted to edit them separately later.
I hope I understood your first problem correctly.

Similar Messages

  • Free Transform multiple layers at the same time (only selected part)

    Hi,
    i have two layers - one contains color and second one contains outline. I want to select a part of the image and free transform both the layers at the same time. (so when i for example move or rotate the selected part of my example, both the color and outline moves at the same time). Layers must stay separated, process must be sort of quick, i would love to use this all the time when drawing etc.
    - Only way i managed to make this somewhat happen was to select the desired part of the image -> save the selection -> new layer via copy (on first layer) -> reselect the saved selection -> new layer via copy (on the second layer) -> select both of the new layers -> free transform. Warp doesnt work but other transforms do. But still this process is too slow and distracting even when having all the required commands hotkeyed. Is there a faster way?
    Any tips are welcome!

    @Trevor.Dennis
    i did understand, but as i said ctrl clicking the new layer only selects visible pixels in it, and my layers dont cover the whole canvas, especially not the outline layer, so ctrl click will only select that noodle of pixels and thats not usable in the other layer. (doing selection in the other layer first isnt a solution)
    Better description of what exactly im after:
    im manually drawing characters and i keep the their black "ink" lines/outlines on separate layer from the color layer. From time to time i want to transform small part of the character, lets say warp or rotate just its leg to fix or iterate, but i want to transform both the outline and color layer at the same time with that rotation so i see realtime how it looks. I would use this all the time if it was doable quickly. Transforms and puppetwarp are so powerful when drawing that as last resort i will have to switch to drawing everything on single layer.

  • Feature Request, option to relink all unlinked layer masks when transforming multiple layers at once.

    As a professional PS artist who works on files with sometimes hundreds of layers, I often need to transform many layers or groups at once. It is a nightmare to find that after the transformation, a mask did not get included in the transformation, (especially when the file is many gigs large, and the transformation took 15 minutes). Sometimes, a mask is accidentally unlinked, but more commonly I unlink it temporarily, but forget to relink it. There is currently no way that I'm aware of to find these pesky unlinked layers, other than going through every single one. What would work great is to have a popup asking if you would like to relink all unlinked layers, whenever you're transforming multiple layers that include one or more unlinked masks. Or else have an option in the layers palette to either select or relink all unlinked layered masks. Hope this makes sense. Cheers!

    Michael,
    It looks like you are right! Thank you for your help.
    I still have a small concern. I looked at the documentation and it reads,
    "The configuration settings for a cache instance are stored in the USER_SDO_CACHED_MAPS metadata view. You should normally not manipulate this view directly, but should instead use the MapViewer administration tool, which uses this view to configure map cache instances."
    But, I tried inserting records into USER_SDO_CACHED_MAPS and it works, and I can't really see any reason not to directly insert records into this table, so...
    Perhaps that warning is there simply because potentially you could screw things up tinkering with the table directly.
    Cheers!
    John

  • Resolving Layer via Copy or Layer via Cut - Grayed Out

    There are many times you will "place" a picture file inside your photoshop document, and want to resize it, put it in a different layer, or crop the image inside photoshop - but you may find a simple error message or grayed out layer via copy/cut prevents you from doing so.
    To do this, you will most often do this one of three ways:
    1) Select the Marquee tool and outline the area of the image you want to copy or cut
    2) Go to Layer > New > Layer via Cut/Copy
    3) Click Ctrl+J
    Many times, you will find none of these selections work. All options will be greyed out. You may be tempted to create a new layer, and then use one of these options in the new layer. In this case, you will get the error message "Could not make a new layer from the selection because the selected area is empty."  All these errors are a result of photoshop not identifying pixels that you are trying to cut/copy.
    There is a simple solution to this problem.  Go over to the "Layers" box, and click on the layer listing for the layer where your newly placed image resides. Make sure your image is the only item in this layer, if not relocate the image into a new layer by itself.  Right-click on the layer where your photo is located in the "layers" box and click on "Rasterize Layer".
    Once you do this you will now be able to follow one of the steps above to Layer Via Copy or Layer Via Cut.
    Good luck.

    you will get the error message "Could not make a new layer from the selection because the selected area is empty." All these errors are a result of photoshop not identifying pixels that you are trying to cut/copy.
    I would say they are the result of the active Layer not being a pixel layer or being empty in the selected region, judging from the remedy you describe.
    And what you seem to call »box« goes by the name of »Panel«.

  • Layer Via Copy ??

    Help and my apologies for the absurd detail in this question!  Recently in a class I saw a Layer (or more usually a Selection) created by an 'unusual' Layer Via Copy method.  I've been unable to duplicate what happened.
    Here's what I saw - From a background layer (with selection), create a new (blank) layer.  Create a SECOND new Layer containing (!!) the 'outline' of the background layer/selection, somehow make the selection/layer appear in this layer and make the blank new layer disappear. 
    Yes, really. 
    Here are the steps I've created to get PART of the way.  Explanations and Corrections welcome, please, really, pretty please and thank you very much!
    Open an image.
    Make a (partial) selection.  (Helps you see what will happen.)
    Using Layer Menu, Create a new layer (Single Left Click [SLC] on the rectangle in rectangle next to the garbage can).
    This is Layer 1.
    From Layer 1 (!) CMND + SLC Create A New Layer.  (Layer 2)
    This new Layer (Layer 2) contains the 'marching ants' outline of the Background Layer.
    PROBLEM:  How do I make the selection - not just the marching ants - appear in Layer 2?
    You can create a solid (black) fill of the selection in Layer 2 with Option + SLC Layers Mask (white circle in gray square in Layers Menu) but though I saw this step, I think it may/might/could have occurred after merging the blank layer 1 with the (at least partially) 'filled' layer 2.
    ALSO; fyi, you can - from the background layer (with selection active)
    create new layer
    return to background layer/selection
    cmnd + create new layer
    and then if (still on L2), option + new layer mask, you get the same black fill as above but the selection disappears from the background layer.
    Thank you very much.

    Yes!  I am confused too!  But, no, I am positive of the approach as I saw it in use.  Can you read a .psd image from an e-mail?  (I'm really stupid about most things.)  If yes, then I can send each step - otherwise...
    Do these steps and watch the result.
    Open an image.
    Make a selection.
    New layer via copy from the Layers Menu Icon (L1 - blank)
    ON LAYER 1 !!!
    CMND + New Layer Via Copy (creates ...)
       L2 and it will have the marching ants outline of/from Background. 
    (Option+Layer Mask and the selection appears in solid black in the layer mask box)
    NOTE:  You don't have to create that blank L1 - you can 'just' from Background/selection CMND+New Layer and get the outline copied to L1(in this case).  What I saw involved first creating a blank layer as above - really.  The next steps, make the selection in L2 appear and the L1 disappear (deleting is cheating...)
    Wish I had a clue
    Is what I've done - so far - right?
    How to make the layer/selection appear in L2.
    Thanks.
    chris pantaleoni
    Pantaleoni Photographer
    2690 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 201
    San Diego, California 92106
    619-857-7280  e-mail:  [email protected]

  • Photoshop CS6 Layer via Copy Question

    Hi,
    I've noticed that when a selection is Layer via Copyed in Photoshop CS6, it appears brighter and slightly more saturated in color than the original selection it came from. Currently I manually make lighting and color adjustments to match it back to the original, but is there a way to prevent this altogether? There are no masks or adjustment layers or any other tools being used when this happens -- just a simple Layer via Copy.
    I'm not sure if there is a setting that will help cut out that time consuming manual step of retouching to match the original selection, but any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks!

    There shouldn't be any difference if it's just layer via copy in the same document.
    What operating system are you using?
    Is photoshop cs6 up to date?
    (Help>Updates from within photoshop cs6)
    Could you post a screenshot(s) showing the difference and your layers panel?

  • Problems/limitations of Layer Via Copy (Cmd+J)

    Some results of Layer Via Copy (Cmd+J) when pixel layers are targeted seem unusual to me. Depending on initial conditions, the result can be entire layers being duplicated instead of just the selection, masks not being duplicated, and the selection being lost plus Select > Reselect being unavailable. It's not difficult to devise workarounds but I think something may be amiss.
    The following table shows my expected and actual results for CS6 on OS X 10.6.8. Results which I find strange are in red triple caps.

    PECourtejoie wrote:
    JJ, line 4 works in CS3. are you sure the layer is targeted?
    It may be available in CS3.  The second machine I had CS3 crashed a while back, so I can no longer install CS3 without calling Adobe for I did nod deactivate it.
    I may have to do that for CS3 is the version of Photoshop that does not have bugs that affect what I use in Photoshop.
    The only versions of Photoshop I can test these days are CS2 CS5 and CS6.
    CS6 is so buggy I don't use it.
    With CS2 row 4 is available, however the new layer created is not correct for the targeted layer layer mask does not affect the creation of the new layer. I retested CS5 and though it looked like I had targeted the layer, the actual target was the layer's layer mask. When I targeted the layers contents the command was available like in CS2; the created layer did not reflect the transparency caused by the layer's layer mask.
    CS6 is still an other story: while cs6 works the same when the layer layer contents is the target, the command is available when the layer mask is the actual target, and the result is that the layer is duplicated and the selection is not honored.
    Here are some screen captures
    CS5 with layer contents targeted
    Results
    CS6 with Layer Mask being the target
    results
    In any case row 4 does not work the way I expected it too.
    I never ran into this problem for normally I use stamp visible layers to create the new layers I want.
    Shift+Alt+Ctrl+N   Shift+Alt+Ctrl+E  or simply Shift+Alt+Ctrl+N+E
    Stamp visible layers does not honor an active selection but leaves it active, so you can add it as a layer mask by just clicking the add layer mask icon in the layers palette after stamping visible layers.....

  • The command "Layer Via Copy" not currently available

    When I use some purchased actions in CS4, I sometimes get "the command 'layer via copy' not currently available."  Does anyone know why?

    No-one will be able to tell you without seeing the Actions. There have been changes to Photoshops layering structure over the years, meaning that some older Actions recorded on older versions will encounter problems.
    "Layer via copy' not currently available" suggests that either a group or nothing is selected in the layers panel. 

  • Layer Via Copy vs Duplicate Layer

    In CS4, what is the practical difference between:
    Layer via Copy (Layer > New > Layer via Copy - or Ctrl/J)
    and
    Duplicate layer (Layer > Duplicate Layer).
    Asked another way: when are they NOT interchangeable.

    If you want to duplicate a layer to another document, they are not interchangeable. Otherwise, I'm pretty sure they are.
    With smart objects, new layer via copy tears off the smart object from other duplicates, so edits made to smart object A do not get copied to smart object B. If you just make a duplicate smart object, then when you edit A you edit B as well.

  • New Layer Via Copy from Extension

    Hello everybody,
    I'm trying to create a new layer using the Layer > New > Layer Via Copy functionality... and I did scan the code using the Scripting Plug-in with this result:
    var idCpTL = charIDToTypeID( "CpTL" );
    executeAction( idCpTL, undefined, DialogModes.NO );
    Then I did convert it to:
    var application:com.adobe.photoshop.Application = Photoshop.app;
    var idCpTL:Number = application.charIDToTypeID( "CpTL" );
    application.executeAction( idCpTL, undefined, DialogModes.NO );
    But this code raises this exception:
    Error: NULL pointer was encountered
              at flash.external::HostObject/__call()
              at com.adobe.csawlib::CSHostObject/hostCall()
              at com.adobe.photoshop::Application/executeAction()
    I've tried to change "undefined" for "null" or any other idea... but with no luck. What am I doing wrong here?
    Thanks a lot!

    Reselect is way too flaky to rely on, and is not going to survive long at the best of times.  I find the whole saving selections thing too time consuming and an annoying interruption of workflow — even if you right click and save an alpha channel.  So I nearly always copy the selected pixels to a new layer, because it works on so many levels.  You can ctrl click the layer to reload the selection; use layer styles, create shadows under the layer…
    Best practice is to add the Alt (Opt) key to Ctrl j so you remember to name it.

  • Free Transform multiple objects...

    It would be very nice to have the ability to select multiple layers/objects and free transform them about their respective orientation points rather than one, shared point.
    For example, I am creating a large grid of items that are all in 1" X 1" squares and get them all spaced correctly on the gird, only to find out that each one needs to be increased slightly in size, BUT keep them centered in their respective squares. But the way I currently do it, I have to go item by item adjusting the sizes individually. A better option would be to be able to select all the objects, check a box that says "Transform by individual Orienation Point" and then go about resizing the one free transform box and having each object transform about their own orientation point, thereby saving me a tremendous amount of time and work.
    The odd thing is, this feature has already been implemented (in a roundabout way) in InDesign already (here), you would think it would have found its way into Photoshop by now.
    Feel free to let me know if I am missing something that is already implemented? Thanks!

    So all your squares need to be upscaled by precisely the same amount? You can can record an Action that will perform the scale on the first. Then just re-run the Action with a shortcut on all the other layers, you can even automate the "move to next layer" step, so just hitting a single key will transform as many layers as you want one by one very quickly. Transform again (command shift T) will misregister them unfortunately.
    Another option is for you to have set the squares up as instanced Smart Objects (if they are all the same). Then scaling one object in Image Size will scale them all instantly.
    What you asked for is an interesting request, but its hard to see how it would be useful generally. 

  • Copy and Paste Multiple Layers (or Group)

    I'm trying to copy a selection of multiple layers and then New - Paste to create a new document with the multiple layers.  What's the best way to do this?  Any suggestions?

    dshock wrote:
    Would work perfectly except the Crop doesn't work with Feathered marquee edges...
    Testing it in CS5 shows that it does.
    Crop works with any kind of selection here

  • CS6 Free Transform ctrl drag not working properly

    Anybody on this ...
    When I use the free transform tool crtr-T and use the ctrl drag button,  the corners do not extend properly.  It extends universally as aposed to a distorted corner-pull.   I uninstalled CS6 and reinstalled still getting the same result.  Any help would be greatly appreciated...
    Thanks

    What conroy wrote convert a smart object layer to a smart object layer may seem a bit strange but he is correct. All smart object layers are not created equal they may contain many types of smart objects.  An  illustrator vector file placed in can most likely be reopened  in illustrator by double clicking on the layers smart icon in the layers palette and transform the vector object in illustrator and when saved in illustrator the embedded smart object will be updated to reflect the changes made in illustrator.  If you encapsulate a VSO into a Smart Object when you transform the resulting smart object layer it will be transformed like a raster layer using interpolation like all Smart Object layers  are transformed. If you want to transform a layer that contain vector graphics using vector graphics you need to correct tools. Transform I would think would only transform Vector Shape Layer using vectors and change Text layer by changing font size all other layer types would be interpolated.  An embedded smart object the contains many Photoshop layers some which are text and vector layers like a places PSD file may be transform better using Photoshop Image Size and then transforming the resulting updated smart object layer if your increasing the layers size.

  • Creative WebCam Vista Plus on USB PCI Card (VIA VT 6212) on Windows ME - doesnt work !!

    PC turns off when the Vista Plus WebCam is connected to the USB port on my USB PCI Card
    I use a primitive Intel Celeron 300Mhz processor with 64MB RAM on an Intel 440BX-AT Chipset running on Window ME. I recently installed a USB PCI Card (based on the VIA VT 622 chipset) which is a 394/USB 2.0 Combo. The problem is my 'Creative WebCam Vista Plus' doesnt work with it.
    After I had installed the drivers on the 'Creative WebCam Vista Plus' CD - that is - without connecting the webcam to my USB PCI card the installation asks me to connect the webcam to the USB port and When I do that the PC just GOES OFF !
    It starts up only in SAFE MODE and each time I've got to restore my PC.
    How do I get the WebCam connected to my PC ?
    Thanks in advance
    Message Edited by Prabhats on 01-19-2007 08:34 AM

    9hours later and Ive given up. I cant get the Vista 64 Ultimate to work with the Audigy 2Nx usb sound card. Im very angry and very frustrated (not to mention very tired from the 2 late nights Ive spent trying to work it out). Im not a PC-noob, but am only 4days into my Vista ownership................... Im guessing now, after much research, that there will never be a driver that gets these units to work with Vista 64bit. thats pretty weak Creative. However, I dont want to use crappy onboard sound for my gaming.What is the suggestion?Should I be looking at returning this unit, and buying either the X-Fi Xtremegamer?Fatality Pro as?a highend device, or the X-Fi Xtremegamer for $00 less? Or should I be looking at another manufacturer. Would either of these x-fi gamers work with Vista 64bit Ultimate?suggestions please?

  • CS3 Free Transform Tool does not work at all for distortion

    I tried everything, worked with vector objects of different configurations and rasterized objects. Nothing works. When I press Free Transform Tool and go to bounding box corner it become rotate or resize tool. When I click a little bit inside the bounding box and hold Command Key (I tried many keys and without keys) it just moves the whole object, it did not select just one point that I need. Envelope Mesh does not work for the same reason, but I do not need mesh tool. I have Illustrator 13.02, Mac OS 10.4.11
    The Free Transform Tool functions exactly as the main selection tool. Please help.

    I STILL cannot get this to work. I have tried everything suggested in this thread. I have followed the directions in the help menus explicitly. I have tried grouping, ungrouping. I have tried it on type, on type changed to outlines, on simple rectangles. Without success.
    When I try to use the free transform tool and hover over a corner of the bounding box, I get either a double-headed corner arrow, a rotation arrow, or a move arrow. Using the first two, dragging the point and then holding down the control/command key results only in a scaling of the object.
    Should I restart? Should I re-install? What should I do?
    Best,
    Fielden

Maybe you are looking for

  • Need help- changing Apple IDs on phone but it won't let me...

    My daughter's iphone was logged into my Apple ID for use with iCloud.  She now has her own Apple ID.  I deleted mine from her phone but am unable to log into hers.  Error message states: 'Cannot Sign In.  The maximum number of free accounts have been

  • Ios 7 calendar bug meeting passing midnight

    I am running a Mac Mini Mountain Lion server with calendar for my wife and I. we both have iPhone with IOS 7 My wife writes her work hours, since there are night shifts, in her calendar to let me know when she is working. After IOS 7 the calendar app

  • Error when  building a report from 2 different subject areas

    Hello Experts, I am using obiee 11.1.1.5. I have 5 dimension D1,D2,D3,D4,D5 connected to fact1 and 4 dimension connected to fact2 such as D1,D2,D6,D7. where D1,D2 is common to both the facts. Fact1 Is in subject area 1 and Fact2 is in subject area2.

  • Share button problem

    In my iMac late 2009 the share button shows only "iCloud Photo Sharing" instead of all my share preferences. What can I do to solve it? I can't share photos in Twitter either Facebook

  • Help with a really simple SQL statement

    Hi All I'm relatively new to SQL and can't get my head round what I believe to be a really simple problem. I have a table I want to query called locations. We use locations to mean groups and regions as well as people s ofr example: TABLE: LOCATION I