Layout with different resolutions

Hallo and good morning!
Once again I need some advice:
I have a program that is running on different machines with different resolutions.
Is it possible to avoid, that the layout is paning all around?
Best regards
Hilby
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Hilby,
No... that is currently a limitation of the layouts, where we try to adapt to each screen, but the objects and the layout may not fit into a different aspect ratio with a different number of pixels.
The aspect ratio is the most important, followed by the total resolution of the screen.
Some more information on aspect ratios is below.
In summary, DASYLab is unable to completely adapt the "Screen" layout for evey monitor size and resolution. If you want to have a fixed layout that does not completely occupy some monitors, then consider using a fixed size, like A4 or A3.
If you make something on a big monitor, 1600x1200 for example, and move it to a wide screen monitor,, 1600x900.
From my friends at Wikipedia
With computer displays, aspect ratios wider than 4:3 are also called widescreen. Widescreen computer displays were previously typically of 16:10 aspect ratio, now they are shifting to 16:9.
Until about 2003, most computer monitors had a 4:3 aspect ratio and some had 5:4. Between 2003 and 2006, monitors with 16:9 and mostly 16:10 (8:5) aspect ratios became commonly available
- cj
Measurement Computing (MCC) has free technical support. Visit www.mccdaq.com and click on the "Support" tab for all support options, including DASYLab.

Similar Messages

Connect 2 externa monitors with different resolutions?

Is it possible to oonnect 2 external monitors, with different resolutions to a mbp pro?
I've read some about the "matrox solution", but that one requires that the monitors uses the same resolution.
And, just to be clear, I don't want to just duplicate the screens, one should be primary.

You may want to phone OWC and ask whether what you want to do is possible if one monitor is connected to the mini-Displayport and the other is connected to a USB port using this adapter:
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/VIDU2DVIA/
Note that the OWC adapter, like most USB video adapters I've seen advertised, is limited to a maximum resolution of 1600 x 1200, so you won't want to use it with a monitor whose native resolution is higher than that.
Message was edited by: eww

HP 6730b can I swap screens with different resolutions?

Hi,
Is it possible to swap screens with different resolutions on a HP 6730b?
Mine is 1680x1050 pixels and I want to find a 1280x800 screen to replace it.
(letters are far too small for an old fart like me. ;-)
The resolution list does support 1280x800 but it looks like viewing the screen through dirty glasses.
Just wondering if the interface is the same.
Cheers,
Bas

Usually people want to go in the other direction. Here is the Service Manual:
Manual link
The parts list shows a panel that is SXGA+ (1400 x 1050) and a WXGA (1280 x 768 or 800) panel.
There are multiple motherboards, but the only difference appaears to be whether there is a slot for a cellular card or not. In other words if you install the WXGA panel the motherboard should work with it and you will get 1280 x 800 resolution looking good. Laptop displays and other digital panels only work at their maximum aka native resolution and you get that muddy look if you try to run them at a lower res. You want to buy the whole panel with the cable designed for the WXGA....sometimes the cables will not work with a different resolution screen. Post back if you need further help finding a screen. You may find it cheaper and easier to sell or trade your laptop for one with the lower resolution screen.

Responsive Layout with multi resolution !

I have this xaml code :
<Grid Margin="0,0,0,0">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<StackPanel Background="Navy" Grid.Row="0">
<Viewbox Margin="15,0,15,0">
<TextBlock Foreground="White" Text="Chỉnh sửa bài hát"
Style="{StaticResource HeaderTextBlockStyle}"
FontFamily="Segoe WP" />
</Viewbox>
</StackPanel>
<Grid Margin="10,5,10,0" Grid.Row="1">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<StackPanel Grid.Row="0">
<TextBlock
Style="{StaticResource BaseTextBlockStyle}"
TextAlignment="Center"
Foreground="DarkGreen"
Text="Mã số" />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding ID}"
Foreground="Navy"
FontWeight="Light"
TextAlignment="Center"
FontSize="30" />
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Grid.Row="1">
<TextBlock
Style="{StaticResource BaseTextBlockStyle}"
TextAlignment="Center"
Foreground="DarkGreen"
Text="Tên bài hát" />
<TextBox
BorderBrush="Silver"
TextAlignment="Center"
FontWeight="Light"
Name="TxtFullName"
Text="{Binding FullName}"
BorderThickness="1.5" />
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel MaxHeight="300" Grid.Row="2">
<TextBlock
Style="{StaticResource BaseTextBlockStyle}"
TextAlignment="Center"
Foreground="DarkGreen"
Text="Lời bài hát" />
<TextBox
TextAlignment="Center"
BorderBrush="Silver"
BorderThickness="1.5"
AcceptsReturn="True"
MaxHeight="250"
MinHeight="250"
FontWeight="Light"
Name="txtLyric"
Text="{Binding Lyric,Converter={StaticResource DecodeLyrics}}"
TextWrapping="Wrap"
ScrollViewer.VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto" />
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Grid.Row="3">
<TextBlock
Style="{StaticResource BaseTextBlockStyle}"
TextAlignment="Center"
Foreground="DarkGreen"
Text="Ca sĩ - Nhạc Sĩ" />
<TextBox
BorderBrush="Silver"
TextAlignment="Center"
FontWeight="Light"
Name="txtAuthor"
Text="{Binding Author}"
BorderThickness="1.5" />
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</Grid
It display nice in my lumia 620 ( I debug my app on real device).. But I don't sure it will nice with other resolution.I think the page will have more blank space at the bottom when display on other larger resolution because I set
3rd StackPanel's Maxheight = 300px.
How could I make it more flexible?
OmegaVN - Window Phone Application Researching and Development

Hi OmegaVN,
In my mind if we want to let our user interface appears correctly on various screen resolutions, then we can try to create a Dynamic layout, for more information, please try to refer to the following article:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/jj207042(v=vs.105).aspx#BKMK_DynamicLayout .
Then based on your xaml code, it seems that you have already created a Dynamic layout, in my mind your UI will appear correctly based the different screen resolutions.
Best Regards,
Amy Peng
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.
You should look at my 3rd StackPane .. I set it's heigh equal 300px ... I think my layout above will have more blank space at the bottom when display on other resolution
I don't have another real device to test it (even can't run emulator ) :(
OmegaVN - Window Phone Application Researching and Development

Multiple displays with different resolutions

The system is setup with two non-mirrored displays with the following resolutions: A) 1024x768 and B) 1280x1024 arranged as BA with A the menu'd display using an ATI 9000 Pro for Mac. During startup, approximately once inch worth of the menu's right items momentarily appear on the right side of display B 768 pixels down from the top. This problem only occurs in this BA configuration of differing resolutions and is independent of graphics cards (substituted the 9000 Pro with a mirror only AGP Navidia card and a mirror only PCI ATI Rage card combination which gave the same result). This problem first appeared using MacOS 10.3 which displayed several inches of menu instead of only an inch under MacOS 10.4. Anyone else seen this problem?
Dual 800 MHz QuickSilver Mac OS X (10.4.4)

Over the weekend, I explained this problem to one of the Apple Geniuses at an Apple store and then was able to duplicate the issue using a lap top and attached monitor in the store (not the same resolutions as my system; but, screens of similarly different resolutions). I raise this issue again because, as of late, additional things have been happening and I wonder if these are related to the core issue of an expanded desktop with two different screen resolutions. All of the widgets on the larger resolution screen desktop are drawing in the menu located in the smaller resolution screen when hitting the "i" to gain access to its control panel; however, not effecting the menu at all when moved to the smaller resolution screen. The other has to do with screen savers periodically blanking both monitors (as though the graphics card went to sleep) or having both monitors lose syncing (first occurrence today) where a cold start is required to bring the monitors on line again (I am going to have to figure out a way to test if the system is actually sleeping or the monitors have only gone blank before cold starting the system).

Why are my HD videos all importing with different resolutions?

Hi, I tried looking through like 10 pages of discussions on here and didn't see anybody else having this problem.
I have a Canon Vixia HF200, I keep the settings on MXP (highest quality 1920 x 1080). Every time I log and transfer my videos they import at different resolutions (everything from the same day will be the same), some of them come in as 1440 x 1080, 720 x 480, etc, when they should all be 1920 x 1080.
So, since some of them ended up being a completely different aspect ratio, I went into Motion>Distort and changed them all to 1920 x 1080, and I thought it was fine, but now I'm noticing that some of the videos look really out of focus (it seems like they get more out of focus every time I open it), so I'm thinking I probably shouldn't have stretched them....
I checked the original videos in the browser and they all say 1920 x 1080 now, when I watch them in the viewer, they actually look like good HD videos, but in the canvas they're out of focus...
I'm also working with multiple sequences, and when I copy videos from one sequence to another, it changes the resolution/aspect ratio/scale again, and becomes more blurry when I try to fix it.
So basically, I have a huge mess. I'm working on editing a documentary that I'm making and now most of the video looks bad and I'm not sure how to change it back. I even tried starting a new project and importing the original videos, but they don't seem to have the original quality.
Anybody know how I can either fix this or somehow replace the clips in the sequence with the originals in the browser to at least get some quality back?
Also, a lot of the time when I render, I come back to the computer and it says something like "Error: Illegal (something) render failed" and completely loses the rendering that it spent a long time doing.
I appreciate any help.
Lisa

Hi Lisa,
Your 1920x1080 clips most likely import at their normal frame size, and then you placed them in the wrong sequence. Make sure your +File > Easy Setup+ is set to *Apple Intermediate Codec 1920x1080i60* before you create a new sequence.

[SOLVED] Configure dual head with different resolutions xf86-video-ati

I have 1680x1050 and 1280x1024 monitors which I would like to setup so that I have two displays (:0.0 and :0.1), i.e. can't drag a window to the other display, but can move the mouse from one screen to the next. The graphics card is Radeon HD 4850.
At the moment I have one screen only, so I can't move the mouse from the first to the second screen, it is captive in the first screen.
xrandr -q
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 1680 x 1680
HDMI-0 connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 338mm x 270mm
1280x1024 60.0*+ 75.0
1280x960 60.0
1152x864 75.0 70.0
1024x768 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 66.7 59.9
720x400 70.1
VGA-0 connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 338mm x 270mm
1280x1024 60.0*+ 75.0
1280x960 60.0
1152x864 75.0 70.0
1024x768 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 66.7 59.9
720x400 70.1
DVI-0 connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 474mm x 296mm
1680x1050 60.0*+
1600x1200 60.0
1280x1024 75.0 60.0
1440x900 75.0 59.9
1280x960 60.0
1152x864 75.0
1280x720 60.0
1024x768 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 66.7 59.9
720x400 70.1
xorg.conf:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "dual head configuration"
Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
Screen "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0"
InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection
Section "Files"
EndSection
Section "Module"
Load "glx"
Load "dri"
Load "drm"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
# keyboard added by rhpxl
Identifier "Keyboard0"
Driver "kbd"
Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
DisplaySize 444 277
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor1"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
DisplaySize 339 271
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Videocard0"
Driver "radeon"
BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Videocard1"
Driver "radeon"
BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Videocard0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Modes "1680x1050"
EndSubSection
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen1"
Device "Videocard1"
Monitor "Monitor1"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Modes "1280x1024"
EndSubSection
EndSection
Xorg.0.log:
(==) ServerLayout "dual head configuration"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0)
(**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0"
(**) | |-->Device "Videocard0"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen1" (1)
(**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor1"
(**) | |-->Device "Videocard1"
(**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0"
It doesn't look as if xrandr can help as it reports a maximum virtual desktop of 1680x1680.
Because the two monitors are different resolutions I don't know if a single screen is the answer.
I used to have two displays/screens configured to two different resolutions matching the monitors using the catalyst driver but can't get it working using the xf86-video-ati driver.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Willem
Last edited by Willem (2010-01-02 20:42:41)

Thanks, with your help I was able to get it working.
The xorg.conf relevant sections:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "dual head configuration"
Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
DisplaySize 444 277
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor1"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
DisplaySize 339 271
Option "RightOf" "Monitor0"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Videocard0"
Driver "radeon"
BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
Option "Monitor-HDMI-0" "Monitor0"
Option "Monitor-DVI-0" "Monitor1"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Videocard0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Virtual 2960 1050
EndSubSection
EndSection
Would still be interested to get a seperate display for each monitor working though.

I see the same photos with different resolutions in my iPhoto library

I am trying to organize my photos in the iPhoto library by deleting those are stored twice or more. However in many doubles I found out that some of them exist in my library in different resolutions. My photos are imported either from my camera, or from my iphone, or from my iPad or from the shared photo streams which include photos imported from various apple devices.
What I see for example is some photos taken from an iPhone exist in both 2048x1536 and in 3264x2448 resolution and some others in 1224x1632 and in 1536x2048 (I guess these 2 resolytions are for the vertically taken thotos while the other 2 for orizontical). For iPad photos I see 2056x1536 and 2592x1936 for the same photos. All doubles have different names (eg. IMG_007 and IMG_1056 for the same photo). Furthermore some doubles include info about the camera (eg. iPad back camer 4.28mm f/2.4) and some others don´t (only info about the device eg. iPad).
Why is this mess happening in my library? Apparently I want to keep in my library the photos only in the maximum available resolution for better quality.
In relation to that I have the following questions:
1. When a photo or a video is shared in a photo stream, is its resolution decreased to a lower one?
2. Is there any way to see what the resolution is of the original photo stored in the iPhone or iPad, so that I can compare with the the same ones I have on my computer´s iPhoto library?
3. Is there any way to see the resolution and other info for the Photos in a shared Photo stream which are not yet imported localy on my computer?
Thanks in advance.

Happy New Year to all!
I made a test and I confirm what I was suspected at first place.
I uploaded a photo taken from my iPhone to the shared photo stream. Then I imported this photo from the photo stream to my iPhoto library on my Mac. The resolution in which this photo is stored locally is 2048x1536 and its size 961 KB.
Then I sent the same photo from my iPhone via e-mail. I opened the email on my computer and downloaded the photo. Then I imported it to my Mac´s iPhoto library. I checked the info out and the resolution is now 3264x2448 and size 2.2 MB.
Therefore the quality and resolution of the photos that are uploaded to the icloud photo stream is NOT the same as the original one.
I don´t know whether there is somewhre an option to change that, but this is what happens to me right now.

Help! Resizing different documents with different resolutions?

Hello!
Please help me with my situation:
I was trying to make an action that will decrease 1 inch to all sides of my document (the document size was 12x36 inches) and hopefully to other documents. I don't want to crop the image, I just want to resize the whole image to 10x24 inches, leaving a 1 inch transparent border (the gray and white checkerboard) to my document. I started resizing manually, but it was time-consuming so I tried to make the action I stated above. I was expecting that it would decrease a proportionate 1 inch to the top, bottom, left and right sides of other documents, but it didn't. Any procedure to make this happen in different documents with different sizes and resolutions?
PS: All the the documents that I will resize would eventually be printed ( I don't know if this would help).
Thank you for your help!

Kursover wrote:
I was trying to make an action that will decrease 1 inch to all sides of my document (the document size was 12x36 inches) and hopefully to other documents. I don't want to crop the image, I just want to resize the whole image to 10x24 inches, leaving a 1 inch transparent border (the gray and white checkerboard) to my document. I was expecting that it would decrease a proportionate 1 inch to the top, bottom, left and right sides of another document, but it didn't. Any procedure to make this happen in different documents with different sizes and resolutions?
Easy to do in a script not so easy in an action unless you know that there is no background layer or that all have backgounds. You can not add transparent canvas to a document with a background layer for brckground layers do not support transparence. Documents may or mant not have a background layer and background layers can be converted to a normal layer. Actions can not use logic without using a script to see if there is a background. My Crafting Actions package contains a utility script for actions that will convert background layers to a normal layer should a document have a background layer. Once you know there is no "Background" the rest is easy to do in an action with menu limage canvas size check relative and set width and height to 1" the will add 1"
Decreasing -1" will CROP any layer the has not transparent pixels in the outter 1"
Crafting Actions Package
Contains
Action Actions Palette Tips.txt
Action Creation Guidelines.txt
Action Dealing with Image Size.txt
Action Enhanced via Scripted Photoshop Functions.txt
CraftedActions.atn Sample Action set includes an example Watermarking action
Sample Actions.txt Photoshop CraftedActions set saved as a text file.
A script can retrieve the width and height of a document to changs size you need to resize the document this will not crop but will resample and you most matain aspect ratio elss resize will distort. Decreasing canvas size may crop...
12 Scripts for actions
Example
Download

Bridge_How Fit-to-Screen with different resolution pictures in Fullscreen/Slideshow

Hallo,
I´m looking for a solution for my following problem:
I have several photographs in totally different resolutions. Some are pretty small, some are huge.
I want to show them with Bridge in FullScreen-Preview or maybe as a slideshow.
How can i bring them all to fit the whole screen, even if the resolution is to small to fit regularly.
In other words, is there an option for dynamic zooming to bring every frame to FIT the Screen, regardless which resolution it got?
I discovered "scale to fit" in the slideshow options, but it doesnt work for me.
An zooming every file in the right position and size is not an option.
Im sure Bridge is able to do it, beacause even IrfanView and ApplePreview are able. But where to find this option?
Can anybody help?
Thank you a lot
best regards
madlo

As far as I know, Bridge will not enlarge small images. If you hit '+' on fullscreen preview, it zooms in, but keeps the same zoom for every image.

Auto-Detect Screen Resolution Does Not Work Across Multiple Monitors With Different Resolutions

Hi,
The Acrobat Pro DC (15.007.20033.2203) auto-detect screen resolution feature does not work with multiple monitors at different resolutions. Acrobat looks fine on my hidpi primary laptop display (Razr 14" 2014) but is completely unusable if I drag or extend the application to a standard HD resolution secondary monitor. Dragging Acrobat from my primary desktop display to the secondary display causes the UI elements to become 2x as large as they should be and makes Acrobat unusable.
Is there a way to make Acrobat auto-detect the display that it is currently on?
Thanks!
-Donald

To prevent it from happing again, you can
1. go to the Mouse preference and turn off the scroll zoom feature.
2. go to the Universal Access preference and disable the zoom features.

Mouse pointer is unchangeable at 100% scaling in multi monitor setup with different resolutions

Hi there, I have been asked by one of the moderators of the Windows 8.1 forums to post this topic here. You can see the thread relating to this post here
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-tms/cant-change-the-cursor-pointer/ae8ad8a0-3ded-4810-a3be-794f6c4830a4?msgId=2bd7082f-f5d1-4b01-8c70-e0d2a754d66f&page=1<o:p></o:p>
The problem: The mouse pointer becomes unchangeable in size, type, trails etc when 100% scaling is used. As in it reverts to the standard small white non-inverted, no trails,
no shadow 'pointer', no matter what options you select in the 'Mouse' control panel settings.<o:p></o:p>
This appears to be a scaling problem with the Windows 8/8.1 display, not an actual mouse problem. Judging by my own and other peoples experience it seems to happen mainly with multi
monitor setups where different screen resolutions are used. The issue occurs typically when 100% scaling for all monitors is used or this option is un-ticked and the 'change the size of all items' is on smallest (equivalent to 100%). <o:p></o:p>
If the scaling is set to 150% or greater the issue disappears and the mouse pointer becomes fully functional. Also bizarrely when the scaling is set to 100% if the screen is recorded
using a screen capture program, the recording of the screen shows the mouse pointer selected in the mouse options and not the default small white cursor that is present when recording it. Here is a link to a video where I explain and show the problem
happening on my system. http://youtu.be/xs2cxoeaq-A<o:p></o:p>
I have every update installed without exception, latest drivers etc. I use a 55" 4k screen with 2x1080p monitors in portrait on either side. All are connected through 1 Nvidia
GTX 780 6GB graphics card<o:p></o:p>
Hope you can help us<o:p></o:p>
thanks<o:p></o:p>
Jon M<o:p></o:p>

Hi Jon,
I'm looking into this issue but it will take me some time to provide a reply.
In the meantime I noticed that you have 3 monitors with 1x 55' and 2x27' - please have a try to only connect 1x27' monitor and see if issue persists.
Also please try to change the screen resolution to a lower size and see if issue persists.
Both suggestions are not solution, I just would like to know if it is related to multiple monitor or screen resolution.
If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected]

Scaling presentations for projectors with different resolutions.

Dear All:
While in the process of creating a few presentations it occurred to me that I will be displaying it using different projectors in different venues. My current presentations have slide with a native resolution of 1400x1050 created for a Canon HD projector. I will soon be presenting with a newer Canon 1920x1200 projector but would like to retain the ability to project using lower resolution projectors so I don't have to depend on a new technology that most venues still don't offer.
Question: What should I do to ensure that my presentations are "universal" and can be displayed anywhere ? In case I create a presentation for the highest resolution (1920x1200) will lower resolution displays be able to scale it down and display it ? In this case will the quality be good, acceptable of just plain bad ? Are there any alternatives to this dilemma ?
Thank you in advance,
Joseph

Absenting any post-keynote software or hardware resizing, there no way I know to make them universal as such. 1920x1200 will output that image size. 1400x1050 that size. There's a few ways to look at it and go about it. Perhaps read following thread then ask some more if still not clear.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9204982&#9204982
As for hardware resizing in the projector or video hardware with so much gear of different makes out there who can predict how it will end up. Other's here would have some more experience with trying that out though.

Video width / length - videos with different resolutions

I have been downloading videos of youtube. Each video seems to have different screen width / length (resolutions).
This is obviously effecting my project.
Does anybody know of any good, free tools to download youtube videos in good quality and specifying the resolution required?
- I am new to this, so im not sure if its even possible - would it effect the video?
- I know there are various types of youtube formats (regular / high quality)
My finished project is only going to be placed back on youtube - my main aim here is to get these various video clips of the same size!
Any help is appreciated. Regards

I assume that you are getting FLV files from YouTube. Is that correct?
PrPro CS5 should be able to Import the FLV's. Just use the fixed Effect>Motion>Scale to Scale any smaller Clips up to the Frame Size of your Project. That is basically what a conversion program will be doing, and with CS5, Scaling got even better. Still, and even with CS5, you are trying to edit material that has been heavily compressed many times, so quality will never be that good.
Good luck, and hope that helps.
Hunt

Working with different resolution clips in single sequence

hi all,
because a large amount of footage i'm using for my film, i'm trying to troubleshoot some issues. one big issue is this:
i've already captured lots of footage at standard dv ntsc. because of the space issue, i'm thinking of capturing the rest of the footage in offlineRT.
i did a test and found that i can work with both footage resolutions in a sequence whose settings are for offlineRT as long as i set the RT popup window to unlimited RT and half (playback frame rate). no rendering needs to be done to see the high res footage for playback with these settings.
my question is this: when i go to up res the footage, does the computer automatically take into account the fact that some footage is already up resed already? are there other issues/problems/challenges i need to be aware of not outlined in the manuals?
thanks for any help!
peace,
ses25

jerry offered some advice, but implied he had no real experience with this. i'm wondering if there's someone who has specific experience with working this way.

Layout with different resolutions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for