LCDS startup is slow on Windows 7 PC

Hi,
We have been using LCDS Express in our product with Tomcat web server. We have been noticing that if we do not start LCDS Message broker
servlet from Tomcat, it starts in ~7 seconds
If we start Message Broker Servelet (and LCDS), startup of Tomcat server is taking ~1 min.
We enabled Flex Server side Logging and seeing that LCDS is taking time to bring up "rtmp channel" possibly. From the logs it seems like this rtemp channel initialization and listening to port 2038 takes about ~8-10 sec each. Another possible area where it is taking time is probably in initializing remote java classes which provide remove methods (about 75 our own java classes defined in remote-config.xml).
This we are experiencing on Windows 7 PC. Rebooting is also not solving the issue on some of this PC.
Also on some other desktops (Win XP or Win 7), sometimes it gets into this kind of slow startup issue and persistent unless we reboot the PC/laptop.
Is this known issue ? Or Is there something we are doing wrong ? services-config.xml and other config files are pretty much like the default one. Not really modified any core settings of channel or endpoints.
How do we make startup of LCDS faster ? Currently this delays our application startup due to this underlying problem and it is very fustrating for users to wait such a long time before they can use it.
thanks for your help.

We only support Windows 7 in LCDS 3.1. Please try with LCDS 3.1 and let us know if you have any problems.
Thanks,
Anil

Similar Messages

Mac OS internet 5x slower than Windows 7 on BootCamp

Alright, here is my problem...
My one and only computer is a mid 2010 iMac... I recently moved to a new place. Prior to me moving I was stuck with an awful 3Mbps download speed. (You can tell how much I hated it by looking at my username) Now that I moved, I am able to get much faster internet. So, I got a plan that offers up to 50Mbps download speeds (Xfinity Blast cable internet). I didn't want to rent my ISP's modem/router, so I purchased my own. I got a Motorola sbg6580. As soon as I got everything hooked up, it seemed perfect. I used speedtest.net to see what I was getting. I first tested on Windows 7. To my surprise, I was getting around 70Mbps. I then restarted my iMac into the Mac OS to do some speed tests. On the Mac OS, I was getting around 50-60Mbps. A bit slower than Windows 7, but still very good. The next day I decided to do a "real world" test. I downloaded a 1 Gigabyte file just to see how fast it was. Now, if I was getting 50Mbps the file should have taken just under 3 minutes to download. Instead, it took around 7 minutes. I figured it was maybe just the website I was downloading from. (the file I was downloading was the Cry Enginge SDK - http://www.crydev.net/ ) I did some research and discovered the website testmy.net - I am not sure if this is completely reliable or not, but every test I do on testmy.net I get around 10Mbps. At first I thought it was my ISP ripping me off, then I decided to do a testmy.net test on Windows 7 via BootCamp. (please note that on both Mac OSX and Windows 7 I did multiple tests over the coarse of multiple days) On Windows, I could instantly tell that the test was going much faster. The results for testmy.net on Windows 7 were 50-60Mbps. I did not completely trust the website, so I downloaded the same Cryengine SDK on Windows. It took around 3 minutes, just as it should have. I researched a bunch online trying to find info on this problem. I tried many "solutions" but none of them changed anything. (these include but are not limited to: Tried different DNS servers, Disabled ipv6, disabled sbg6580 firewall, disabled mac osx firewall, tried changing the wireless channel, and reset sbg6580. I came to the conclusion that it was the sbg6580. I thought that maybe an airport express would give me better results. So, today I bought an Airport express. With the sbg6580, I was able to disable the router features so it was just a modem. I was then able to set up the Airport express as my router. It fixed nothing. I am still getting the same results, Windows is still getting anywhere from 50-60Mbps while Mac OSX is getting around 10Mbps. I am out of ideas, if anyone could please help me that would be great. Also, if you need to know anything else please let me know. I may have missed something...
A quick note:
At my old house I had my iMac hooked up to a surge protector. For maximum internet performance, my iMac was connected to my router with an ethernet cable. During a bad storm one day, a lightning bolt either hit my house or very close to it. Ever since, my ethernet port has not worked. I have tried multiple eithernet cables as well as multiple routers and networks. I do not have the money for apple to completely replace my logic board. - So anyway, I am unable to test the performace with an eithernet cable.
Extra information:
My sbg6580 as well as my Airport extreme are both sitting on the same desk as my iMac, so it is obviously not a signal problem.
I also own both a iPod touch 5th gen and a iPad 2nd gen. I am getting around 20-30Mbps on both of them. I am not sure what would be a "good speed" on either of these, but I figured that was pretty good for a tablet and ipod.
The upload speeds on both windows 7 and Mac OSX are around the same 5-10Mbps.
I am using Google Chrome on both Windows 7 and Mac OSX but, I have also tried Firefox and Safari.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, or by a peripheral device.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Post for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including wireless networking on certain Macs. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

Is ORACLE slower on Windows then on Linux ?

Hi,
I'm suppose to choose the platform for Oracle .... Linux or Windows 2008 Server ...
Ones we've installed Oracle on Windows 2003 Server and it was really slower like 200-300% ..... we did simple default install
Does anyone know if this is a fact that Oracle will run slower on Windows platform then on any other ? Any experiance with that ? If we are talking about 5-10% then this is ok and I'll stick with windows ...
Cause I know how to deal with windows much more then how to deal with Linux admin, install and other stuff ...
Thank you...
Kris

burleson wrote:
Hi Charles,
Installing a virus scanner on the server, especially if it is permitted to scan program and data files used by Oracle.Ha, that a good one! That the FIRST thing I check!
Also, I've seen high demand screensavers (fractals) clobber Oracle performance . . .
Oracle on Windows uses a thread modelThat's actually one of the few "positives" about running Oracle on Windows . . .
rather than providing a performance comparison between Linux and Windows.Fine, try here:
www.dba-oracle.com/oracle_tips_linux_oracle.htm
"Roby Sherman performed an exhaustive study of the speed of Oracle on Linux and Microsoft Windows using identical hardware. Sherman currently works for Qwest Communications in the data technologies group of IT architecture and transversal services. He is a recognized expert in designing, delivering, tuning, and troubleshooting n-tier systems and technology architecture components of various size and complexity based on Oracle RDBMS technology.
Sherman concludes that Linux was over 30% faster:
"From perspective of performance, RedHat Linux 7.2 demonstrated an average performance advantage of 38.4 percent higher RDBMS throughput than a similarly configured Windows 2000 Server in a variety of operational scenarios." Sherman also notes: "Another point of contention was Window's lack of consistency between many database administrative functions (e.g., automated startup, shutdown, service creation, scripting) compared to what DBAs are already used to in many mainstream UNIX environments (e.g., Solaris and HP-UX)."
Mr. Burleson's comments seem to be out of line. No, I'm right on the money.
*I've seen enough companies get burned by Windows (unplanned outages, data corruption) to speak with confidence.*
Bottom line, it's malfeasence to recommend any OS platform for a production database application that has an unsavory history.
It does not take a genius to figure out that an OS with this kind of history should not be used with any data that you care about:
- "blue screen of death"
- legandary security vulnerabilities
- memory leaks you could drive a truck through
- Patching weekly
- The world's most incompetant tech support
I'm not alone in this opinion:
thetendjee.wordpress.com/2007/01/22/oracle-10202-sucks-on-windows/
www.google.com/search?&q=%22windows+sucksMr. Burleson,
Good point on the screen saver.
Comparing Windows 2000, released in March 2000, with Red Hat 7.2 which was released in ... sorry, forgot the date, but I put in a couple servers running that release of Linux into service in 2001. I was kind of hoping that you would have an article which pits Windows 3.1 against the original Linux release. :-)
You might be happy to know that things have changed significantly since Windows 3.1, and also significantly since Windows 2000. There were many improvements in Windows 2003 over Windows 2000 (I happened to read a couple large books on the subject of Windows 2003 Server a couple years ago). This page contains a couple links that you may want to browse:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/performance/default.mspx
Windows sucks... I have heard that the Microsoft Windows operating system is on barcode scanners, phones, and even car navigation systems. I had no idea that vacuums also utilized Windows, thanks for the heads-up:
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6289552/description.html
http://advertising.microsoft.com/BestVacuum
Interesting Google search of the day: define:malfeasence
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Amalfeasence&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
"Did you mean: define:malfeasance
No definitions were found for malfeasence"
define:malfeasance
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Amalfeasance&spell=1
"Definitions of malfeasance on the Web:
•wrongful conduct by a public official
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
•The expressions misfeasance and nonfeasance, and occasionally malfeasance, are used in English law with reference to the discharge of public obligations existing by common law, custom or statute.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malfeasance
•wrongdoing; Misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official that causes damage
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/malfeasance"
define:unsavory
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Aunsavory
"Definitions of unsavory on the Web:
•morally offensive; ‘an unsavory reputation’; ‘an unsavory scandal’
•distasteful: not pleasing in odor or taste
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
•Disreputable, not respectable, of questionable moral character
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unsavory"
Regarding blue screen of death, those are rather rare with versions of Windows since the release of Windows 2000. The last blue screen that I saw on a server happened when an ECC memory module started experiencing multiple hardware bit errors which could not be corrected by the ECC memory logic. The server hardware forced the blue screen to prevent data corruption. The previous blue screen? A Windows NT 4.0 Server (circa 1996) when a new RAID controller was added to the server.
Regarding legandary security vulnerabilities, well I don't think that it quite qualifies as legendary. However, given the wide usage of Windows (particularly by people just starting to learn to use computers), there will very definitely be more security issues to contend with - Windows often offers a larger attack surface than other operating systems. Yes, there have been many security problems over the years.
Regarding memory leaks you could drive a truck through, I have to say that in a server environment I have not experienced that problem. On a desktop environment, I would say that it is typically the fault of poorly written applications which cause the memory leaks. Windows will often clean up after the poorly written applications when they are closed.
Regarding patching weekly, yes there are typically frequent security and bug fixes released for the Windows platform, but I suggest that if someone is patching weekly on a server, there is probably a larger problem to be addressed.
Regarding the world's most incompetant tech support, I am not sure that I follow your logic:
define:incompetant
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Aincompetant
"Did you mean: define:incompetent
No definitions were found for incompetant.
Suggestions:
- Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
- Search the Web for documents that contain 'incompetant'"
As previously stated, consideration should be given to the operating system which is most familiar to the OP.
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

Access 2007 very slow on Windows 7

Access 2007 is running very slowly in on two new Windows 7 clients. By slow, I mean the response time within Access - moving from screen to screen is dreadfully slow, taking 30+ seconds on Windows 7 to do what a computer with Windows XP will do in
1 second.
I cannot find any information that addresses the issue.
We have been running Windows XP SP3 clients successfully for almost a year. The speed is virtually instantaneous. The Access file is hosted on a file server, Windows Server 2003, with SQL Server Express 2008. Nothing has changed on the
server. The Windows XP clients previously and currently experience no problems.
The first of 2 new computers were deployed with Windows 7, with OS pre-loaded from Dell. Microsoft update was run to update OS and Access. Once discovered that Access was running brutally slow, I used the other new PC to test. Windows 7
freshly installed. Office 2007 freshly installed. Tested - still slow. Ran Windows Update, then re-tested. Still slow.
The issue reminds me of the slowness experienced when we were developing the Access database on my laptop which was running Vista. So, it runs fine on XP, but not on Vista or 7.
I'm convinced the problem is a conflict with Windows 7 on the client, but cannot pinpoint it. I've searched these forums and Google for answers, but have not found any information that has specifically addressed this issue. Can anyone offer assistance?

After reading numerous forums , I was able to resolve
the following issues (Screens Freezing, Screens Lag/Flickers, combo/list boxes freezing whilst searching for data) by carrying out the following:
Creating a brand new copy of the MS Access database in MS Access 2007/2010 using the Windows 7 image
Importing the database objects (tables queries, forms, reports, macros and modules) into MS Access 2007 /2010 d/b within the Windows 7 image.
Setting the
MaxBufferSize of 16384 (Decimal), HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE (regedit) onto various PCs as recommended by various forums.
Making sure that the relevant reference libraries have been selected for MS Access 2007. This should automatically set throughout the default
installation as demonstrated below:
Visual Basic For Applications
Microsoft Access 12.0 Object Library
OLE Automation
Microsoft DAO 3.6 Object Library
Microsoft ActiveX Data Objects 2.5 Library
Also by typing in the following words into Google, provided me with some solutions, however the instructions above allowed me to rectify the issues
experienced above.
MS Access 2007 slow in Windows 7
MS Access 2007 and Windows 7 issues
MS Access 2007 freezes
Performance slow with MS Access and Linked Tables
Slow performance windows 7 using MS Access

How can I get a better driver for my 1394b Hostcontroller in my Macbook pro 2010 to solve the problem, that it is too slow under Windows 7 installed with bootcamp ?

How can I get a better driver for my 1394b Hostcontroller in my Macbook pro 2010 to solve the problem, that it is too slow under Windows 7 installed with bootcamp ?
WIndows can't find a better one than the installed LSI Conformed 1394 Hostcontroller

Read and follow the Bootcamp Installation instructions that you were offered to view when you ran Bootcamp Assistant.
Run Bootcamp Assistant again and select the option to download the Bootcamp Support software. Follow the instructions. Then boot into Windows and install the Windows Support software you downloaded and saved.

PSE 12 running slow in Windows 7?

I have just installed PSE 12 on a Windows 7 platform and it runs very slow and freezes when I try to selct files in organizer. Is there anyhting I can do in settings, etc.?

From: Barbara B.
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:56 PM
To: Mike DMD
Subject: PSE 12 running slow in Windows 7?
      I followed the instructions exactly as in the article.I don’t think there is much scope for error as i did not encounter similarly named files and the described path took me exactly to the file in Program Files. I am certain I have never encountered similar problems with my laptop before. Even if I made a mistake, it would have been so easy to make that I would not recommend anyone else to try that!
      Re: PSE 12 running slow in Windows 7?
      created by Barbara B. in Photoshop Elements - View the full discussion I

Focused slow on Windows 7

Hello,
some of the users of Focused are experiencing lags when typing.
The lag grows as the length of the text increases.
I verified the same behavior on Windows 7 32 bits (Adobe Air 1.5.3.9130)
It is a simple application, working correctly on win xp, vista.
Any idea?
The app:
http://spreadingfunkyness.com/focused/
The code:
http://code.google.com/p/focused/
Thanks in advance.

Hi Wleblanc,
“WebDAV is VERY slow on Windows 7 only. When using WebDAV on Windows 8 or using the web portal (browser), file uploads are very fast.”
Do you mean only the uploading operation in WebDAV of Windows 7 is slow or the whole WebDav performance is slow ?
Please check this service ”Webclient” from the service control .
I noticed that the process of creating a WebDAV connection is a little different in Windows 7 and Windows 8 .Someone indeed informed the information that this service will affect the WebDAV performance.
Here are links for reference:
Using Windows, how do I use WebDAV to upload files to my Oncourse Resources or Drop Box?(Pay attention to the creating process)
https://kb.iu.edu/d/araf
How to speed up webdav in windows 7 solved for me(Pay attention to
Ahmed Osman`s answer)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alfresco-technical-discussion/XF5HTouSnC0
NOTE: This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft does
not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
Best regards

WebDav Very Slow on Windows 7 Pro

Environment:
Hosted SharePoint 2010
Two laptops on a Windows Domain: 1) Windows 7 Pro 32-bit & IE11 and 2) Windows 7 Pro 64-bit & IE11.
Problem:
WebDAV is VERY slow on Windows 7 only. When using WebDAV on Windows 8 or using the web portal (browser), file uploads are very fast. We've performed extensive testing as follows with no success.
Installed or confirmed SP1 was installed
Disabled "Automatic Detect Settings" within Internet Options -> Connections -> LAN Settings.
Forced port 443 within URL upon mapping a drive (ex. <URL>:443)
Logged in using the local administrator's profile
Detached computer from domain and used the local administrator's profile

Hi Wleblanc,
“WebDAV is VERY slow on Windows 7 only. When using WebDAV on Windows 8 or using the web portal (browser), file uploads are very fast.”
Do you mean only the uploading operation in WebDAV of Windows 7 is slow or the whole WebDav performance is slow ?
Please check this service ”Webclient” from the service control .
I noticed that the process of creating a WebDAV connection is a little different in Windows 7 and Windows 8 .Someone indeed informed the information that this service will affect the WebDAV performance.
Here are links for reference:
Using Windows, how do I use WebDAV to upload files to my Oncourse Resources or Drop Box?(Pay attention to the creating process)
https://kb.iu.edu/d/araf
How to speed up webdav in windows 7 solved for me(Pay attention to
Ahmed Osman`s answer)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alfresco-technical-discussion/XF5HTouSnC0
NOTE: This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft does
not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
Best regards

Very slow scrolling window thumbnails clips

Very slow scrolling windows with thumbnail clips. The more files in the event, the worse it gets. It is very frustrating. Is in others it is the same? I have MacOookPro i7 early 2011, thunderbolt drives RAID0, 16GB memory, FCPX 10.0.7. After the hardware is decent.
Give some feedback, thank you.
P.S. I might add that this disadvantage are found from version 10.0.0.

You might want to look at either booting from your install dvd (insert, restart and hold 'C' down) and running disk repair from Utilities. Alternatively, and I always suggest any Mac user should have at least one, a 3rd party disk utility like DiskWarrior (there are others) is extremely useful.

Why is Java startup so slow?

Does anyone know why Java startup is so slow? Compared to other interpreted languages like Javascript and Perl, they run much faster. And can someone get technical with me? (But without pointing me to the JVM specification, which I don't understand.) It use to take longer for me to load Mozilla0.9 than a Java applet, but now Mozilla1.3 loads faster than a Java applet.

"Connector" is a rather ill-defined way of describing
it, which is why I chose the word -- to easily deflect
further inquiries to quantify. ;>
In a slightly more specific way, on start-up JVM needs
to (not necessarily in order, 'cause I don't know the
exact order) at the very minimum:
1. Allocate memory.
2. Query OS for a minimal set of needed facilities.
3. Allocate memory. Allocate allocated memory
(internally, for use by itself and the application).
4. Map the OS facilities to Java facilities. (This is
what I meant by "connectors").
5. Allocate memory. Allocate allocated memory.
6. Set up the internal control -- security managers,
thread scheduler, gc, classloaders, calling stacks,
virtual lookup tables, etcetc.
Some of the above don't apply to applets.
Thanks for the tip on 1.4.2beta. I'll give it a try. I
assume you meant startup speed?All this is almost instant you realize. The real time it takes to start your program is that it takes much longer for Java classes to be loaded.
The startup time is proportional to the number of classes you need to load to get your program running. If you only are writing a simple, console based java program the startup time will be much less then if you load a Swing application. Swing by itself is a huge number of classes, and then you have to load your classes. So it can take awhile.
All the things you mention, every program has to do and the code that the JVM uses must be written in C or some other systems language.
One reason at least on my machine that java startup is slow is that I have a slow hard drive. On my home machine, java is much faster around twice as fast to startup, but the processor and ram are not twice as good. I think that it's because the hard drive is faster. Because most of the time it's waiting for data from the disk and the Java enviroment has the disadvantage that it's very large on disk.

During startup I get a window saying: No disk

In the window this message can be seen: There is no disk in the unit. Put in a disk in unit \Device\Harddisk1\DR1
Thankful for help.
Best Regards,
Hans-Åke Karlsson

Hello,
There must be a misunderstanding, I have not written that I use version 12, I use version 13
and the solution was to disable the file OldFilm.AEX
Best Regards,
Hans-Åke Karlsson
Ursprungligt meddelande---- Från: [email protected] Datum: 2015-03-17 16:19 Till: "Hans-Åke Karlsson"<[email protected]> Ärende: During startup I get a window saying: No disk
During startup I get a window saying: No disk
created by A.T. Romano in Premiere Elements - View the full discussion
hans-Ake Karlsson
After I posted post 2, I saw your other thread where you wrote about using Premiere Elements 12/12.1
Is Adobe force you to buy a update by stopping your old one? It doesn't work anymore.
The deleting or disabling of the OldFilm.AEX file has seemed to be the solution for the No Disc error specific
to Premiere Elements 13. So, I would ask, "What was the solution that you found for your Premiere Elements 12 No Disc?
Thank you.
ATR
If the reply above answers your question, please take a moment to mark this answer as correct by visiting: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7308228#7308228 and clicking ‘Correct’ below the answer
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:
Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed an image in your message please visit the thread in the forum and click the camera icon: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7308228#7308228
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at , click "Following" at the top right, & "Stop Following"
Start a new discussion in Premiere Elements by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1516624.

Any new discoveries on Photoshop CS3 files opening slow in Windows 7?

Any new discoveries on Photoshop CS3 files opening slow in Windows 7?

Extend Dave's advice to also include looking for any network shares that may be mapped (e.g., to a drive letter) but not presently online.
-Noel

I am trying to startup InDesign but a window opens and reads, cannot load BNCORE.RPLN plugin. It requires 10.2 version of Indesign. Need compatible version of BNCORE.RPLN. What do I do at this point

I am trying to startup InDesign but a window opens and reads, cannot load BNCORE.RPLN plugin. It requires 10.2 version of Indesign. Need compatible version of BNCORE.RPLN. What do I do at this point

reinstall ID. The update was not successful.

Compaq CQ56 running slow in Windows 7

After obtaining my Compaq CQ56 laptop, I reinstalled Windows 7 to start fresh. However, the laptop is running extremely slow. I could use some advice on what TO DO

From: Barbara B.
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:56 PM
To: Mike DMD
Subject: PSE 12 running slow in Windows 7?
      I followed the instructions exactly as in the article.I don’t think there is much scope for error as i did not encounter similarly named files and the described path took me exactly to the file in Program Files. I am certain I have never encountered similar problems with my laptop before. Even if I made a mistake, it would have been so easy to make that I would not recommend anyone else to try that!
      Re: PSE 12 running slow in Windows 7?
      created by Barbara B. in Photoshop Elements - View the full discussion I

IOP startup and shutdown as windows services

Hi,
Is there a way can we have IOP startup and shutdown as windows services instead of running the bat files?
Thanks,
Hari Devarapalli

Yes. You can install IOP as NT service and start/stop it.
Please refer to "Installing Integrated Operational Planning as an NT Service" in the IOP install guide.

LCDS startup is slow on Windows 7 PC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for