LCm function change in 11.1.2.2

Hi Experts,
I came across the changes done in 11.1.2.2 with respect to LCM functioning.
In 11.1.2.1 when we try to export security from foundation, we have option to filter the groups with certain criteria. which is not their in 11.1.2.2.
So in 11.1.2.2 it will export total secuirity from fountaion, which has bring an extra efforts for me as we have different sub -business sharing same Hyperion platform.
Is their way that i can get that filter criteria concept in 11.1.2.2 or i am missing something ?
Also,
While import we use to get 3 options -delete, update,update/create option in 11.1.2.1 which is not their during import for 11.1.2.2 so how it takes the decision to select those options while import.? again i am i doing any thing worng or i missed any setup which has to be done to get these above said functions in 11.1.2.2
Please help me.

Thanks John and Celvin for update on export query... and Nick too for import one :).
I have seen this document before but i think haven't read it properly. My bad :( .
Let me check the global syntax in LCM properites. Clevin i am sure we will have something for filter as its very useful thing for us.
Will keep you posted and sure i will give points to all.At least i got the pin point to digg further :)
Cheers!
Sh!va

Similar Messages

  • Exadata - Any Functionality Change Between V2/X3 and the ESS/RDBMS?

    All,
    We are currently running a V2 quarter-rack on 11.2.0.2 BP7 and 11.2.2.3.2 ESS. We're moving to a X3 quarter-rack shortly which will run whatever the latest and greatest versions of RDBMS/GI/ESS are.
    On our current Production environment, we make use of HCC and discovered that with bitmap indexes (of which we have plenty) it was necessary to disable the index, perform the HCC compression on the table and then rebuild the index afterwards.
    Obviously, a very intensive operation when we have HUGE indexes.
    Does anyone know if this behavior the same in 11.2.0.3 RDBMS/latest ESS? Are we still required to disable the indexes before we perform HCC on the table or have the relationship between HCC and bitmap indexes chilled a little bit?
    Mark

    Hi, Tycho,
    Yep - got the May 21 build (BP 18) and it arrived four days later (that's what you get for ordering at Oracle's financial year end!)
    I've checked and I can't find any difference in functionality in the documentation that you referenced. I'm not surprised given that Oracle seem to save functionality changes for Release levels and have the Patchset levels fix bugs.
    Thanks for the link
    Mark

  • Userexit  for partner function changed

    What is the userexit for partner function changes in VA01 or VA02.

    Hi,
    Please check this:
    EXIT_SAPLEINM_002
    Thanks and best Regards,
    Suresh

  • Lvanlys.dll Real IFT function change from version 6.1 to version 7

    I am aware that the dll file "lvanalys.dll" changed from LabVIEW version 6.1 to 7. Specifically I have found that the inverse real FFT function not only changed name but _seems_ to have changed in operation.
    The version 6.1 function is called "ReInvFFTCx", the version 7 function is called "InvReNIFFTH". Due to the difficulty in building VIs that use the two different functions from the dll's, I have attached pictures of the output that is obtained from each function. I put the same magnitude and phase vectors into each IFT function and as shown the time domain signals as well as the power spectra are very different. I am hoping that someone that knows about these changes can verify that th
    ere were some functionality changes made and furthermore can shed some light on what was done to test the new function that is included in version 7. The output from the version 6.1 function seems to be much more reasonable to me, especially considering the power spectra vs. the input magnitude spectra.
    Any help on this issue would be greatly appreciated, but for now I am resorting to building my own VIs that use the old function, but this is certainly not convenient considering you have to keep track of he dll, etc.
    Attachments:
    IFT_results_V6.1_vs_V7.pdf ‏21 KB

    I appreciate your response. The symmetry of the input data is clearly an issue that I was not aware of and overlooked. I have done some reading and modified the input signals so that the real portion has even symmetry and the imaginary part has odd symmetry. However, the time domain output is still different between the versions of the dll file and furthermore the power spectrum is still much worse with the version 7 dll than the version 6.1 dll as compared to the input frequency domain signal (see new PDF file attached below).
    I can not be sure that there not something else wrong with my input, but I have to say that it seems like something is very wrong with the version 7 implementation of the Real IFT. I don't understand how NI could have mis
    sed this, but if they did, I would think they would care a great deal about finding it as the FT is so instrumental in so many VIs within LabVIEW.
    Attachments:
    IFT_results_with_Re_and_Im_V6.1_vs_V7.pdf ‏33 KB

  • [svn:bz-trunk] 18830: Checking in a few minor tweaks that I had locally, no real functionality change.

    Revision: 18830
    Revision: 18830
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-11-29 07:07:50 -0800 (Mon, 29 Nov 2010)
    Log Message:
    Checking in a few minor tweaks that I had locally, no real functionality change.
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/FlexContext.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/security/LoginManager.java

    I've never used any of the E Series and have often wondered how they stack up compared to their N Series counterpart !
    I can say from the freeware Symbian 60 side of things - precious few (useful !) applications exist. It's one of the reasons why I've downloaded Nokia's own freeware development environment (as I'd also like to get back into programming), but unfortunately I never get round to kicking a project off !
    Regards,
    Edward

  • Partner function change in sales order

    Hi,
    I have partner function ZR (sales employee) defined for customer master. I enter a particular employee no 100 in the customer master. and subsequnetly the partner function ZR gets copied into a contract with value 100.
    now another user is trying to change the value to 200 from 100, but the system is giving a message that partner function ZR not defned for partner procedure.
    If i go to partner determination for  sales order , then i see that there is no partner function ZR assigned for a patner procedure.
    my question is that the above is happening due to lack of master data for emploee id 200 from HR module or is it that we have to maitain partner function ZR for sales order (I have seen that ZR is not maintained for sales order. ).Iam assuming that for contracts aslo, the config needs to be done in parnter determination for sales order.
    regards
    sachin

    Hi Sachin,
    I assume that you have configured the partner functions for Customer master including ZR, also enabled ZR for the partner procedure applicable for the sales document type.
    If this is done, then the partner function ZR should be available for entry in the sales order.
    Now the problem is that
    You shoudl have assigned the partner function ZR to some account group, while creating this partner function, and customer 100 shoudl have belonged to this account group.
    However the customer 200 whom you want to update as the new ZR doesnt belong to this account group.
    You can use only those customers belonging to the account group which is linked to the partner function ZR as sales employees.
    So find out the customers belonging to the account group, which is linked to the partner function ZR. Make sure their masterdata is correct for the sales area which you wnat to use. If all the things satisfy, then you should be able to use them as ZR partner in your sales document.
    This should solve your problem.
    Pls reward if this helps you to solve the problem

  • Regarding function changes in sap backend system

    Hi Team,
    I would like to check if we can alter functions and its actions/permissions in SAP back end and transport it across landscape.
    This is needed as we customize the rule set and its difficult to validate the risk analysis changes directly in production when its made via nwbc.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Anil

    Hi Anil
    If you maintain a Function definition then you are updating those tables (Function to Action (transactions) and Function to Permission (Authorisations) tables). So the answer is YES
    If you are asking if you should maintain directly in Production Vs Transport then the answer would be DEPENDS - what is your company process
    If you are asking if you can maintain the SAP delivered rule set (activate via BC SETS) then the answer is DEPENDS. Again, it comes back to your company business process. You would then need to consider how you manage any future recommendations from SAP if they update their rule sets
    But again, those tables is where you store function definitions so of course you can maintain them.
    Regards
    Colleen

  • Stop using the deposit function - change default G/L account

    We originally configured our system to use a separate clearing account and the deposit function for cash, credit card, and check incoming payment types.  Now, we would like to change that and post payments directly into our cash account without having to go through the deposit function.   I have two questions regarding this.  1.) Would this cause problems in the future, and 2.) when I go to set the cash account as the default account in the G/L Account Determination window for Checks Received, it will not let me choose or directly type the cash account.  It will allow me to choose any account starting with our clearing account numbering. What would be the reason or resolution to this?

    Hi!
    If you select a different acc (cash acc) in Check tab, i belive it will affect the Cash flow report.

  • [disappeared]After update, scroll function changed. Want the old paradigm back.

    Laptop: Dell Inspiron 1545
    OS: Kubuntu 13.04
    Firefox: 24
    Mozilla Firefox for Ubuntu canonical 1.0
    What I have now: I press the arrow keys on the laptop (these are dedicated arrow keys, not multifunction keys), and the whole screen slams to the bottom (press down arrow key), or to the top (press the up arrow key).
    What I expected: I expected no changes from what I had before - a smooth scroll of a few dozen pixels per second (not actually measured), i did not want a top slam or bottom slam. I already have dedicated keys for 'home' and 'end' which are elsewhere on the laptop keyboard (also dedicated keys, are not multifunction), so my expectation for the arrow keys is that the earlier smooth scroll functions would remain unchanged.
    Somewhere since early August (give or take, I've been busy), I updated to Kubuntu 13.04 from 12.10, and I have updated the packages a few times. I remember that before these updates, the arrow key as a scroll function was what I had been using since I owned the laptop, it worked fine before, I know I hate what scroll is doing now. I have not modified about:config, but would do so if it comes to solve the scroll.
    I've visited the KDE Control panel for the trackpad/mouse settings, nothing seems obvious. I know Kubuntu/Ubuntu slammed a LOT of system changes on me in this update, so I really haven't any way to be certain of the location of the needed changes... maybe the issue is not Firefox, but FWIW, I have scrolling issues on another Firefox installation and want that issue solved as well (this one request might fix both scroll issues).
    Where could I turn to solve this?

    The ONLY thing I have done is toggle caret browsing between 2 states, it was off when I first tested caret browsing for this thread (which means it was not part of the initial situation which I posted about), I turned caret browsing on to test it and I still had the slamming problem; I returned caret browsing to off, I still had the scroll slamming.
    Since I last posted, I put the laptop into sleep mode (closed the screen over the keyboard), I worked an hour outdoors, I then awoke the laptop to check this thread, and now scrolling is normal. Seems that the problem has 'suddenly gone away' since the laptop slept.
    To the reader: caret browsing made no difference: it was off when the problem occurred, caret browsing turned on still slammed, caret browsing turned off after the testing still slammed.
    FWIW, prefs.js changed around (I kept no records of timing) the time that I toggled caret browsing, but as I stated above, caret browsing made no difference when I tested both of its modes.
    Does caret browsing need time to take effect?
    Does caret browsing need to have FF backgrounded then foregrounded?
    Did toggling caret browsing change something in my preferences or in the FF config file? I see ~/.mozilla/firefox/vr8blhii.default/localstore.rdf changed since I slept the laptop... isn't that file related to plugins?
    My networking gets disconnected a few moments after I sleep the laptop (BUT: I have slept the laptop dozens of times this week alone, the scroll slamming was never diffrerent until just before this post)... does that force any events inside FF? The OS settings were not changed since a few days ago, so the OS is not at fault.

  • Vendor Master partner functions change at plant level

    Hello All,
      I need to change the vendor partner functions at the plant level.By default it takes the partner no equal to vendor no.But in my requirement the partner no can be differnt than the vendor no.Can anyone let me know how to do this?I cant do a BDC recording
    also since the system cant automatically select the plant no in the table control.
    Thanks,
    Rakesh.

    Hello Jürgen!
    Thanks!
    Do you know of any user exit which will help on this.
    Best Regards

  • Functional change between GDK and EDK?

    Hi,
    I've already made tens of portlets using the ASP.Net GDK but I use the newer EDK for the ones I create now. I saw a few functional differences and I'd like to know if I'm mistaken or not.
    With GDK, my pages inherit from "Plumtree.Remote.Csp.UI.Page" and under the hood, the context is created (SettingsManager) automatically. Apparently, this is not the case anymore with the EDK. Am I correct?
    According to the EDK doc, I need to call "PortletContextFactory.CreatePortletContext(Request,Response)" for such purpose. Still correct?
    The other more important change is that with the GDK, the language of the current thread is automatically set to the language passed by the portal in the "Accept-Language" HTTP header. This is not the case anymore, to my knowledge, and I found out that I need to insert this:
    String sLanguage = HttpContext.Current.Request.UserLanguages[0];System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture=new System.Globalization.CultureInfo(sLanguage);
    Is this correct or did I miss something?
    Thanks beforehand - Fred

    With GDK, my pages inherit from "Plumtree.Remote.Csp.UI.Page" and under the hood, the context is created (SettingsManager) automatically. Apparently, this is not the case anymore with the EDK. Am I correct?
    According to the EDK doc, I need to call "PortletContextFactory.CreatePortletContext(Request,Response)" for such purpose. Still correct?
    -- Yes, correct. In the EDK, no SettingsManager is used, and the functionality is wrapped into IPortletRequest and IPortletResponse.
    The other more important change is that with the GDK, the language of the current thread is automatically set to the language passed by the portal in the "Accept-Language" HTTP header. This is not the case anymore, to my knowledge, and I found out that I need to insert this:
    String sLanguage = HttpContext.Current.Request.UserLanguages[0];System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture=new System.Globalization.CultureInfo(sLanguage);
    Is this correct or did I miss something?
    -- You do not need to use the HttpContext object of .NET. The Plumtree EDK allows you to retrieve the language as follows: The portal language is stored in a User Pref named "strLocale". A remote portlet can read this User Pref.The only point to note is that, as with all User Prefs, you must ensure that the specific prefs are sent to the portlet in the Portlet Web Service registration.
    PortletRequest.GetSettingValue(Plumtree.Remote.Portlet.SettingType.User, "strTimeZone")

  • Trinidad Nested Tables Collapse and Expand Functionality Change

    I am using JSF Trinidad 1.2 for JSF Implementation.
    I am using <tr:table> and f:facet's detailStamp component's of Trinidad to get Nested Table functionality. I have three tables i.e. table1, table2, table3. Each row of Table1 has nested Table2 and each row of Table2 has nested Table3. It seems that the collapse and Expand functionality of these component makes AJAX call to the server and fetches the relevant data.
    My requirement is to have data populated to all the three tables during initial Load and use clientSide Javascript function to collapse the Table2 and Table3 rows on initial Display. Once all the table1 rows are displayed, I should have collapse and expand at row level of Table1 that should make Table2 data visible and invisible on click using Javascript i.e. no server side call.
    I am not sure If I can disable the inbuilt AJAX calls on click to expand and collapse. If yes, how I can do that?
    Second Thing will be how I can populate my custom Javascript on those collapse and expand onclick event?
    Thanks In Advance

    Hi Suvidha,
    Thanks for the response, but in my scenario I have a viewset in component A and overview page in component B. I am using viewset as assignment block in component B where i need to change the title on Lazy and Direct mode. Method of IF_BSP_WD_HISTORY_STATE_DESCR for viewset does not work in this scenario.
    I am trying to get a method which get called on change of Lazy and Direct mode for an assignment block .

  • Delta load after upgrade to 2004s - Functional changes

    Hi All,
    I have some doubts about Delta using DTP.
    Our BI landscape has been upgraded to 2004s from 3.1 (technical upgrade). There are many existing delta loads and we cannot afford to mess anything at all. So my question to you all
    When we do a functional upgrade...
    1. The existing delta from 0FIL_GL_4, AP_4, AR_4, WBS_6, NWA_2 etc all having delta loads right now and go to DSO. The records are in many millions. It is highly unlikely they will allow me to delete the PSA and reload all, because it will take couple of months. So that is out of the question.
    We have 3 situations.
    1. Delta from Data Source into DSO.
    2. Delta from DSO to Cubes
    3. Delete from few Cube to Cube.
    Questions
    1. After converting from Info Package to DTP I will still load the delta from Data Source to PSA, but the data source need to migrated to 2004s. WIll it cause any issues in loading delta data?.
    2. The DSO to further targets are using delta info package, I believe I change the info package to DTP with load mode selected as DELTA. Is this correct?
    Thanks in advance.
    Alex.

    DTP is used to load data only from PSA to Datatargets and DELTA DTP Loads the last PSA request which was transferred to PSA from source.
    So 2 plausible ways could be -
    1)Delete all PSA data and so your DELTA DTP will get the DELTA load only or new changed posted to PSA only and not all the previous requests ..but you may not want to delete the PSA now.
    2)Fake the DTP using some infoobject FILTER selection criteria as blank which acts like INIT w/t data transfer and then do DELTA DTP as mentioned below -
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=10026965&messageID=4743634
    1. After converting from Info Package to DTP I will still load the delta from Data Source to PSA, but the data source need to migrated to 2004s. WIll it cause any issues in loading delta data?.
    NO
    2. The DSO to further targets are using delta info package, I believe I change the info package to DTP with load mode selected as DELTA. Is this correct?
    YES
    Hope it Helps
    Chetan
    @CP..

  • Has Paragraph Rules function changed in 2014 upgrade?

    Paragraph rules seem to be misbehaving in latest version of InDesign 2014. Has there been a change in its function in this new version update?  Anyone: Please try making a paragraph rule a different color from your type. In my version, it can't be done. Type and paragraph rule color is one and the same in Paragraph Rule dialog box, Rule Above and Below. Check it out. Is it just me?

    There are no changes in paragraph rules. Try restoring your InDesign preferences:
    Trash, Replace, Reset, or Restore the application Preferences

  • R12 Upgrade Product Functionality Changes

    Hi All,
    We are now on 11.5.10.2 and have plans to upgrade to R12.
    Is there any document which will give the changes in the Functionality of the Product?
    The document that will describe the changes that R12 has compared to 11.5.10.2?
    I am looking for document for CRM modules, but if i will find all then it will be Better.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Regards,
    Vikram
    [email protected]

    Vikram,
    Check Note: 404152.1 - E-Business Suite Release 12: Release Content Documents
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=404152.1

Maybe you are looking for